Re: [Bug 270303] Re: MASTER - firefox (intrepid/jaunty): "your browser has been updated and needs to be restarted"

2009-06-16 Thread Karthick
Hi ,

Thanks for your reply.

Thanks & Regards,

Karthick Selvakumaran.P


On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:11 PM, ricardisimo
wrote:

> I just want to confirm that the latest upgrade (to FF 3.0.11) went very
> smoothly, with no repeated restart requests... only once. Thank you to
> everyone once again. you do good work.
>
> --
> MASTER - firefox (intrepid/jaunty): "your browser has been updated and
> needs to be restarted"
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270303
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of a duplicate bug.
>
> Status in Ubuntu Firefox Extension: Fix Released
> Status in “ubufox” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
> Status in ubufox in Ubuntu Intrepid: Triaged
>
> Bug description:
> Up to date intrepid.
>
> ii  firefox
> 3.0.2+build3+nobinonly-0ubuntu2   meta package for the
> popular mozilla web browser
>
> A drop down keeps advising "your browser has been updated and needs to be
> restarted".
>
> Restarting does not make it go away.
>
> Dismissing it makes it go away for about 1 minute.
>

-- 
MASTER - firefox (intrepid/jaunty): "your browser has been updated and needs to 
be restarted"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270303
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share

2009-01-15 Thread Karthick
Hi Folks,

  Kill all the other linux distros and merge the rest of the unix
distributions we will get a powerful beast of unnatured that can
competete and get rid of microsoft entirely from the markrt

-- 
Microsoft has a majority market share
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share

2009-01-15 Thread Karthick
Hi Folks,

  Kill all the other linux distros and merge the rest of the unix
distributions we will get a powerful beast of unnatured that can
competete and get rid of microsoft entirely from the markrt

-- 
Microsoft has a majority market share
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 74566] Re: Crash XPC_WN_Helper_NewResolve

2009-01-15 Thread Karthick
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 73857 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73857

Hi Folks,

 please rtemove the duplicate bugs

-- 
Crash XPC_WN_Helper_NewResolve
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 318243] [NEW] booting ubuntu, partition manager, and ubuntu copier critical issue

2009-01-17 Thread Karthick
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***

Public security bug reported:

Hi,
  I have decided to switch from federo10 to ubuntu .
I have started to install ubuntu.The ubuntu partition manager has asked to 
define the partition.
I have selected manually and i have removed the logical partition that i have 
installed federo 10.
The Partition manager asks that removing  a partition will delete all the data 
in it.
I ask th partition manager to format and remove the data also.
then the ubuntu installtion procedure continues.
the ubuntu founds that there are certain linux file in that system and it 
calculates how many percentage of file it can skip for copying.
I am raising a question that if partition manager removes all the files and 
deletes the partition and recreates it once again .How could ubuntu finds the 
existing linux file system?.Even though I knew that the inodes will deleted in 
a file system and files will be present in that particular location itself as 
there are too many partition recovery tools are there I hope that ubuntu seems 
to be proactively finding the removed partition files.
that is not the issue.
the ubuntu then claims that it is removing the conflict files of the other 
operating system.The ubuntu installation procedure continues.
and the installtion has been over and after rebooting i have received a KERNEL 
PANIC message.
On analysing this issue in detail I could find that the grub boot loader has 
been pointed to the old and removed (as partition manager statement)federo core 
kernel. and I couldn't locate the kernel image.The ubuntu kernel image is found 
in the second option.
Please correct this issue,by asking ubuntu installer to remove all the existing 
files in the logical disk and install a fresh copy as we like.Even though 
ubuntu seems to be increase its installation speed by using the existing files 
it couldn't do the process properly.
sorry guys for this big passage.
I am trying to improve the open source ubuntu more efficiently.
Think in a part of a nongeek or non technical fellow if he plans to change 
distro's what will he feel regarding ubuntu when he receives a kernel panic 
message at installing first time our favourite ubuntu? 

Thanks&Regards,
Karthick Selvakumaran.P

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
booting ubuntu,partition manager,and ubuntu copier critical issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318243
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 318361] [NEW] ubuntu plugin finder service database iSSUE

2009-01-17 Thread Karthick
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: mozilla-firefox

HI ,
The Plugin database is not updated properly.It seems I couldn't find any 
description for the abode plugin
I have not installed adobe plugin .when I try to connect www.asinonline.com I 
am asked to install the adobe plugins.

plugin finder service

choose a plugin for media type application/x-shockwave-flash:
In abode plugin I could not find any description about it.
Please add the description for adobe plugin too.
Thanks & Regards,
Karthick Selvakumaran.P

** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
ubuntu plugin finder service database iSSUE
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318361
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 318361] Re: ubuntu plugin finder service database iSSUE

2009-01-17 Thread Karthick

** Attachment added: "1"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21304020/1

-- 
ubuntu plugin finder service database iSSUE
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318361
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 318361] Re: ubuntu plugin finder service database iSSUE

2009-01-17 Thread Karthick

** Attachment added: "1"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21304035/1

-- 
ubuntu plugin finder service database iSSUE
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318361
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 318427] [NEW] Ubuntu File manager and desktop sync Issue

2009-01-18 Thread Karthick
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***

Public security bug reported:

Hi folks,

I know that we can't hide a folder or file in ubuntu directly by 
changing any properties.But we can do it in an indirect way.
that means renaming the file or folder that starts with an .
for example:
selva is the initial file name and renaming it as .selva will prevent the file 
from others unless they are using ls -a
.But I have used an approach .I have renamed a folder in my desktop selva to 
.selva and I refreshed my desktop .I couldn't see the file.cool I have opened 
the file manager nautilus and moved on the edit -->preferences-->show hidden 
files
 (ctrl + H)and backup files .I could see the hidden folder.But when I am 
refreshing my desktop I couldn't see the particular folder.How come this could 
be possible.As per the logic I have to see the hidden folder in the desktop to 
as I am selecting to view all the hidden files and folder .But I couldn't view 
it.Please fix this bug.

Thanks & Regards,
Karthick Selvakumaran.P

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
Ubuntu File manager and desktop sync Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318427
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 318427] Re: Ubuntu File manager and desktop sync Issue

2009-01-18 Thread Karthick
Hi,
   I have also refreshed the desktop too.
Thanks & Regards,
Karthick Selvakumaran.P

-- 
Ubuntu File manager and desktop sync Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318427
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 318427] Re: Ubuntu File manager and desktop sync Issue

2009-01-18 Thread Karthick
Hi Chris,

Thanks for our valuable reply

On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Chris Coulson <
chrisccoul...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
> better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which is
> important for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper developers. You
> can learn more about finding the right package at
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage . I have classified this bug
> as a bug in nautilus.
> For future reference you might be interested to know that a lot of
> applications have bug reporting functionality built in to them. This can be
> accessed via the Report a Problem option in the Help menu for the
> application with which you are having an issue. You can learn more about
> this feature at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs.
>
> You also marked this bug as a security vulnerability. I'm changing that,
> as you haven't identified a security vulnerability.
>
> ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
> Sourcepackagename: None => nautilus
>
> ** This bug is no longer flagged as a security issue
>
> --
> Ubuntu File manager and desktop sync Issue
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318427
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in "nautilus" source package in Ubuntu: New
>
> Bug description:
> Hi folks,
>
>I know that we can't hide a folder or file in ubuntu directly by
> changing any properties.But we can do it in an indirect way.
> that means renaming the file or folder that starts with an .
> for example:
> selva is the initial file name and renaming it as .selva will prevent the
> file from others unless they are using ls -a
> .But I have used an approach .I have renamed a folder in my desktop selva
> to .selva and I refreshed my desktop .I couldn't see the file.cool I have
> opened the file manager nautilus and moved on the edit -->preferences-->show
> hidden files
>  (ctrl + H)and backup files .I could see the hidden folder.But when I am
> refreshing my desktop I couldn't see the particular folder.How come this
> could be possible.As per the logic I have to see the hidden folder in the
> desktop to as I am selecting to view all the hidden files and folder .But I
> couldn't view it.Please fix this bug.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Karthick Selvakumaran.P
>

-- 
Ubuntu File manager and desktop sync Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318427
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 315994] Re: THE XCHM Application crashes when we are clicking hyperlink in the xchm document

2009-01-10 Thread Karthick

** Attachment added: "error.png"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21097357/error.png

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
THE XCHM Application crashes when we are clicking  hyperlink in the xchm 
document
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315994
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 317046] [NEW] ubuntu 2.6.27-9-generic kernel vulnerability

2009-01-14 Thread Karthick
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***

Public security bug reported:

Hi folks,
 The Kernel freezes and the Xserver too freezes as a impact of this 
vulnerability
I have planned to change the hostname dynamically hence i have decided to 
change it in 
/proc/sys/kernel/hostname
r...@asin-desktop:~# uname -r

2.6.27-9-generic

r...@asin-desktop:~# echo "asin " > /proc/sys/kernel/hostname

r...@asin-desktop:~# cat  /proc/sys/kernel/hostname

asin

I have changed by host name dynamically and after changing it none of my 
applications are starting
for example when i am planning to start firefox,Movie player etc it is not 
starting.
When i switched from one user to other for example from asin to selva and when 
i log out from selva and move back to asin the xserver cashes

please fix this serious vulnerability ASAP.
Please Let me know If you need more Information.
Thanks & Regards,
karthick Selvkumaran.P

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: ddos freezes kernel

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
ubuntu 2.6.27-9-generic  kernel vulnerability
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317046
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 317046] Re: ubuntu 2.6.27-9-generic kernel vulnerability

2009-01-14 Thread Karthick
HI Adam,
 Thanks for your valuable reply.

Thanks & Regards,
karthick Selvkumaran.P


On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Adam Niedling  wrote:

> This is a known thing. You can only do it with root privileges so this
> is not a vulnerability. It's like saying "sudo rm / -rf"  was a
> vulnerability. There are a million ways if you want to intentionally
> damage your system as root. There is no protection for that.
>
> You must change both /etc/hosts and /etc/hostname* if you want to change
> your hostname.
>
> However I agree that there should be a simpler way to change hostname.
>
> ** Changed in: ubuntu
>   Status: New => Invalid
>
> --
> ubuntu 2.6.27-9-generic  kernel vulnerability
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317046
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in Ubuntu: Invalid
>
> Bug description:
> Hi folks,
> The Kernel freezes and the Xserver too freezes as a impact of this
> vulnerability
> I have planned to change the hostname dynamically hence i have decided to
> change it in
> /proc/sys/kernel/hostname
> r...@asin-desktop:~# uname -r
>
> 2.6.27-9-generic
>
> r...@asin-desktop:~# echo "asin " > /proc/sys/kernel/hostname
>
> r...@asin-desktop:~# cat  /proc/sys/kernel/hostname
>
> asin
>
> I have changed by host name dynamically and after changing it none of my
> applications are starting
> for example when i am planning to start firefox,Movie player etc it is not
> starting.
> When i switched from one user to other for example from asin to selva and
> when i log out from selva and move back to asin the xserver cashes
>
> please fix this serious vulnerability ASAP.
> Please Let me know If you need more Information.
> Thanks & Regards,
> karthick Selvkumaran.P
>

-- 
ubuntu 2.6.27-9-generic  kernel vulnerability
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317046
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 318243] Re: booting ubuntu, partition manager, and ubuntu copier critical issue

2009-01-19 Thread Karthick
Hi Watson,
I am installing ubuntu 8.10 version.
I have received the message that uduntu installation completed .
I couldn't find anything indicating that the installation has failed.
I have formated my machine once again in windows vista and removed all the
files in ext3
and hence I can't provide you the log files.I am so sorry

Please let me know If you need more Information.
Thanks & Regards,
Karthick Selvakumaran.P

On 1/19/09, Colin Watson  wrote:
>
> There is no need to tell me how bad the problem is; I can work that out
> for myself! :-) It sounds like the installation was perhaps only
> partially completed, but it is not clear.
>
> I do need some very basic information from you which you haven't
> provided:
>
> * Which version of Ubuntu were you installing?
> * Did you see the installer's final message indicating that it completed
> successfully? (It will have looked something like "Installation is complete.
> You need to restart your computer in order to use the new installation.
> [etc.]") Alternatively, did you see anything indicating that the installer
> had crashed?
> * Assuming that you managed to get the system up and running in the end,
> please attach the files /var/log/installer/syslog and
> /var/log/installer/partman to this bug report. Those files are critical to
> let me discover what happened here, and I will be unable to do anything with
> this bug without those files.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
> Sourcepackagename: debian-installer => ubiquity
>   Status: New => Incomplete
>
> --
> booting ubuntu,partition manager,and ubuntu copier critical issue
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318243
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in "ubiquity" source package in Ubuntu: Incomplete
>
> Bug description:
> Hi,
> I have decided to switch from federo10 to ubuntu .
> I have started to install ubuntu.The ubuntu partition manager has asked to
> define the partition.
> I have selected manually and i have removed the logical partition that i
> have installed federo 10.
> The Partition manager asks that removing  a partition will delete all the
> data in it.
> I ask th partition manager to format and remove the data also.
> then the ubuntu installtion procedure continues.
> the ubuntu founds that there are certain linux file in that system and it
> calculates how many percentage of file it can skip for copying.
> I am raising a question that if partition manager removes all the files and
> deletes the partition and recreates it once again .How could ubuntu finds
> the existing linux file system?.Even though I knew that the inodes will
> deleted in a file system and files will be present in that particular
> location itself as there are too many partition recovery tools are there I
> hope that ubuntu seems to be proactively finding the removed partition
> files.
> that is not the issue.
> the ubuntu then claims that it is removing the conflict files of the other
> operating system.The ubuntu installation procedure continues.
> and the installtion has been over and after rebooting i have received a
> KERNEL PANIC message.
> On analysing this issue in detail I could find that the grub boot loader
> has been pointed to the old and removed (as partition manager
> statement)federo core kernel. and I couldn't locate the kernel image.The
> ubuntu kernel image is found in the second option.
> Please correct this issue,by asking ubuntu installer to remove all the
> existing files in the logical disk and install a fresh copy as we like.Even
> though ubuntu seems to be increase its installation speed by using the
> existing files it couldn't do the process properly.
> sorry guys for this big passage.
> I am trying to improve the open source ubuntu more efficiently.
> Think in a part of a nongeek or non technical fellow if he plans to change
> distro's what will he feel regarding ubuntu when he receives a kernel panic
> message at installing first time our favourite ubuntu?
>
> Thanks&Regards,
> Karthick Selvakumaran.P
>

-- 
booting ubuntu,partition manager,and ubuntu copier critical issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318243
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 567111] [NEW] package libcolamd2.7.1 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: cannot access archive: No such file or directory

2010-04-20 Thread karthick
Public bug reported:

package libcolamd2.7.1 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: cannot
access archive: No such file or directory

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: libcolamd2.7.1 (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Apr 20 13:29:11 2010
ErrorMessage: cannot access archive: No such file or directory
SourcePackage: suitesparse
Title: package libcolamd2.7.1 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: cannot 
access archive: No such file or directory

** Affects: suitesparse (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid

-- 
package libcolamd2.7.1 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: cannot access 
archive: No such file or directory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567111
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 567111] Re: package libcolamd2.7.1 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: cannot access archive: No such file or directory

2010-04-20 Thread karthick

** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44880589/AptOrdering.txt

** Attachment added: "Df.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44880590/Df.txt

** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44880591/Dmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44880592/DpkgTerminalLog.txt

-- 
package libcolamd2.7.1 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: cannot access 
archive: No such file or directory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567111
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 567111] Re: package libcolamd2.7.1 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: cannot access archive: No such file or directory

2010-04-20 Thread karthick
thank u jean the problem was exactly what u said. i was trying to
install from local media , i removed the installation source from local
media to online repository and i am done.

-- 
package libcolamd2.7.1 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: cannot access 
archive: No such file or directory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567111
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 725361] Re: transmission torrent disconnects network

2011-07-02 Thread karthick
hi,

sorry for replying to your mail in a belated way.

I am facing the problem in 11.04 too. the transmission gets disconnected
whether wired or wireless.

The network gets disconnected only if transmission is open/running.

Otherwise, the network never gets disconnected.

I tried upgrading the transmission version too, but it's of no use.
the problem still persists.


On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:29 PM, jordan <725...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:

> Karthick, thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make Ubuntu and
> Transmission better.
>
> I'm not seeing this behavior myself. Does being wired vs. wireless make
> any difference? Does the problem persist on any network, or just on one?
> Also, does upgrading to the version of Transmission in Natty change
> anything?
>
> ** Changed in: transmission (Ubuntu)
>   Status: New => Incomplete
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725361
>
> Title:
>  transmission torrent disconnects network
>
> Status in “transmission” package in Ubuntu:
>  Incomplete
>
> Bug description:
>  Binary package hint: transmission
>
>  When transmission torrent is left idle for more than 1 hour, the
>  network gets disconnected. This problem is encountered only when using
>  Transmission and not while using other programs.
>
>  ProblemType: Bug
>  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
>  Package: transmission-gtk 2.04-0ubuntu2
>  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-25.44-generic 2.6.35.10
>  Uname: Linux 2.6.35-25-generic i686
>  Architecture: i386
>  Date: Sat Feb 26 05:55:28 2011
>  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/transmission
>  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386
> (20101007)
>  ProcEnviron:
>   PATH=(custom, no user)
>   LANG=en_IN
>   SHELL=/bin/bash
>  SourcePackage: transmission
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/transmission/+bug/725361/+subscribe
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725361

Title:
  transmission torrent disconnects network

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/transmission/+bug/725361/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 725361] [NEW] transmission torrent disconnects network

2011-02-25 Thread karthick
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: transmission

When transmission torrent is left idle for more than 1 hour, the network
gets disconnected. This problem is encountered only when using
Transmission and not while using other programs.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: transmission-gtk 2.04-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-25.44-generic 2.6.35.10
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-25-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Feb 26 05:55:28 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/transmission
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 (20101007)
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_IN
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: transmission

** Affects: transmission (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725361

Title:
  transmission torrent disconnects network

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 725361] Re: transmission torrent disconnects network

2011-02-25 Thread karthick
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725361

Title:
  transmission torrent disconnects network

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 452652] Re: Creating DSL connection section is too terse in internet

2010-11-04 Thread karthick
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => karthick (getyourkarthick)

** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: karthick (getyourkarthick) => (unassigned)

-- 
Creating DSL connection section is too terse in internet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452652
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 139246] Re: Suspend help files are outdate

2010-11-04 Thread karthick
** Summary changed:

- Suspend help files are outdated
+ Suspend help files are outdate

** Summary changed:

- Suspend help files are outdate
+ Suspend help files are outdated

-- 
Suspend help files are outdated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139246
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 540377] [NEW] package linux-image-2.6.31-20-generic 2.6.31-20.58 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127

2010-03-17 Thread karthick Ayyapillai
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: grub2

I updated my system using the sudo apt-get update command and then installed 
all available updates through the update manager. I got two updates for the 
linux kernel 2.6.31. After the update i tried to access the you tube video in 
full screen it came with an error that my flah plugin has crashed. Soon after 
that i got the message that linux kernel 2.6.31 is failed to install and asking 
me for the admin previlages after that i got a bug report option .
I am using the ubuntu karmic kola 9.10, Gnome 2, chrome browser, adobe flash 
plugin .

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Mar 17 16:49:13 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 127
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5)
Package: linux-image-2.6.31-20-generic 2.6.31-20.58
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-20.58-generic
SourcePackage: grub2
Title: package linux-image-2.6.31-20-generic 2.6.31-20.58 failed to 
install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error 
exit status 127
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-20-generic i686

** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386

-- 
package linux-image-2.6.31-20-generic 2.6.31-20.58 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540377
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 540377] Re: package linux-image-2.6.31-20-generic 2.6.31-20.58 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127

2010-03-17 Thread karthick Ayyapillai

** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41144830/AptOrdering.txt

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41144831/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41144832/Dmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41144833/DpkgTerminalLog.txt

-- 
package linux-image-2.6.31-20-generic 2.6.31-20.58 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540377
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 540377] Re: package linux-image-2.6.31-20-generic 2.6.31-20.58 failed to install/upgrade: exit status 127 - /etc/default/grub: 9: : Permission denied

2010-03-17 Thread karthick Ayyapillai
thanks for the reply and quick action 
yes i have tried to modify the default GRUB file to enable my graphics card in 
the line
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="radeon.modeset=1" like this 
then save it 
I have attached the grub file with this 

** Attachment added: "grub"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41153687/grub

-- 
package linux-image-2.6.31-20-generic 2.6.31-20.58 failed to install/upgrade: 
exit status 127 - /etc/default/grub: 9: : Permission denied
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540377
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 540377] Re: package linux-image-2.6.31-20-generic 2.6.31-20.58 failed to install/upgrade: exit status 127 - /etc/default/grub: 9: : Permission denied

2010-03-27 Thread karthick Ayyapillai
thanks for the help your solution solved my problem and everything is
fine with grub now .But i am facing one problem after editing the file
as per your instruction the GRUB is fine when i load it through it
display the options and then when i select my ubuntu image to boot it
goes in to text mode and load all the hardwares after loading all the
hardware it enters the GNOME.

-- 
package linux-image-2.6.31-20-generic 2.6.31-20.58 failed to install/upgrade: 
exit status 127 - /etc/default/grub: 9: : Permission denied
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540377
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs