[Bug 39853] Re: While installing ClamAV dpkg returns an error
I just tried installing clamav on a fresh install of Feisty, the following error message was returned by synaptic: Preconfiguring packages ... Selecting previously deselected package libgmp3c2. (Reading database ... 94303 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libgmp3c2 (from .../libgmp3c2_2%3a4.2.1+dfsg-4build1_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libclamav2. Unpacking libclamav2 (from .../libclamav2_0.90.2-0ubuntu1_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package clamav-base. Unpacking clamav-base (from .../clamav-base_0.90.2-0ubuntu1_all.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package clamav-freshclam. Unpacking clamav-freshclam (from .../clamav-freshclam_0.90.2-0ubuntu1_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package clamav. Unpacking clamav (from .../clamav_0.90.2-0ubuntu1_i386.deb) ... Setting up libgmp3c2 (4.2.1+dfsg-4build1) ... Setting up libclamav2 (0.90.2-0ubuntu1) ... Setting up clamav-base (0.90.2-0ubuntu1) ... Adding system user `clamav' (UID 110) ... Adding new group `clamav' (GID 119) ... Adding new user `clamav' (UID 110) with group `clamav' ... Not creating home directory `/var/lib/clamav'. dpkg: error processing clamav-base (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of clamav-freshclam: clamav-freshclam depends on clamav-base (>= 0.90.2-0ubuntu1); however: Package clamav-base is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing clamav-freshclam (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of clamav: clamav depends on clamav-freshclam | clamav-data; however: Package clamav-freshclam is not configured yet. Package clamav-data is not installed. Package clamav-freshclam which provides clamav-data is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing clamav (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: clamav-base clamav-freshclam clamav E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: Setting up clamav-base (0.90.2-0ubuntu1) ... Setting up clamav-freshclam (0.90.2-0ubuntu1) ... * Starting ClamAV virus database updater freshclam ...done. Setting up clamav (0.90.2-0ubuntu1) ... -- While installing ClamAV dpkg returns an error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/39853 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 39853] Re: While installing ClamAV dpkg returns an error
sudo ls -l /var/run/clamav total 4 -rw-rw 1 clamav clamav 4 2007-05-10 21:33 freshclam.pid -- While installing ClamAV dpkg returns an error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/39853 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 94189] Re: Digital Output jack selected by default on a Soundblaster live
Same thing here, I agree with Chris though, most common option should be default in my opinion. -- Digital Output jack selected by default on a Soundblaster live https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 94189] Re: Digital Output jack selected by default on a Soundblaster live
Thank you for the information Daniel! I never thought that this was hardware related the way you describe it. Anyway, thanks for your effort and please ask if you need any more information/testing in the future! -- Digital Output jack selected by default on a Soundblaster live https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 95011] Re: erratical titlebar behaviour
I can confirm the problem when disabling the wobbly windows. The workaround of Evandro works for me too. -- erratical titlebar behaviour https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97085] File roller crashes while extracting data from .tar.gz file
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: file-roller Crash report: Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy) Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu) BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0 Memory status: size: 85110784 vsize: 0 resident: 85110784 share: 0 rss: 17285120 rss_rlim: 0 CPU usage: start_time: 1175019608 rtime: 0 utime: 242 stime: 0 cutime:227 cstime: 0 timeout: 15 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 210 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/file-roller' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1225685328 (LWP 6790)] [New Thread -1254368352 (LWP 6823)] (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) 0xe410 in __kernel_vsyscall () #0 0xe410 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb78a701e in __lll_mutex_lock_wait () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 #2 0xb78a3673 in _L_mutex_lock_49 () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 #3 0xbff00be8 in ?? () #4 0xb72e78a8 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 #5 0xb6f186b0 in ?? () #6 0xb53bdba0 in ?? () #7 0x0030 in ?? () #8 0xb79401e4 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #9 0xb7e44380 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0 #10 0xb78a33e0 in pthread_mutex_destroy () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 #11 0xb78f8af0 in g_static_rec_mutex_lock () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #12 0xb7e028b0 in async_job_callback_map_destroy () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0 #13 0xb7e0295f in async_job_callback_map_destroy () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0 #14 0xb7e0fd57 in gnome_vfs_job_get_count () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0 #15 0x084d0d10 in ?? () #16 0x084b2f18 in ?? () #17 0xbff00c78 in ?? () #18 0xb7e43348 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0 #19 0x084b2f18 in ?? () #20 0x in ?? () Thread 2 (Thread -1254368352 (LWP 6823)): #0 0xe410 in __kernel_vsyscall () No symbol table info available. #1 0xb78a834b in __waitpid_nocancel () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #2 0xb7eae1b6 in gnome_gtk_module_info_get () from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0 No symbol table info available. #3 No symbol table info available. #4 0x083e9c10 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #5 0xe18be5b5 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #6 0x386600b7 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #7 0x897ff408 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #8 0x899120b7 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #9 0x4b1d80b7 in ?? () N
[Bug 69029] Administration menu etries without gksu
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome After upgrading to Edgy from Dapper, I noticed the following problem in the System->Administration menu: For the entries: * Networking * Services * Shared Folders * Time and Date * Users and Groups I got an error message stating that "The configuration could not be loaded" After examining the menu entries with alacarte, I found that the commands, e.g. 'network-admin' are called without the gksu command. ** Affects: meta-gnome2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Summary changed: - Administration menu etries without gksu + Administration menu entries without gksu -- Administration menu entries without gksu https://launchpad.net/bugs/69029 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 69029] Re: Administration menu entries without gksu
** Changed in: meta-gnome2 (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: meta-gnome2 => gnome-menus -- Administration menu entries without gksu https://launchpad.net/bugs/69029 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78288] Re: kernel 2.6.20-9 doesn't boot with sata-hd
Booted 2.6.20-9 WITH the "irqpoll" option and got the following message: 'irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)' I'll try compiling the 2.6.19-7 kernel to see what it does tomorrow (or can I get a package somewhere?) ** Attachment added: "dmesg with "irqpoll" option" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6710258/dmesg.log -- kernel 2.6.20-9 doesn't boot with sata-hd https://launchpad.net/bugs/78288 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78288] Re: kernel 2.6.20-9 doesn't boot with sata-hd
I've just compiled the 2.6.19-7 kernel using the standard Herd5 kernel .config file. Booted without problems, I'll attach the dmesg and lspci output. ** Attachment added: "dmesg-2.6.19-7.log" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6720947/dmesg-2.6.19-7.log -- kernel 2.6.20-9 doesn't boot with sata-hd https://launchpad.net/bugs/78288 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78288] Re: kernel 2.6.20-9 doesn't boot with sata-hd
** Attachment added: "lspci -vvnn with kernel 2.6.19-7" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6720950/lspci-vvnn_2.6.19-7 -- kernel 2.6.20-9 doesn't boot with sata-hd https://launchpad.net/bugs/78288 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78288] Re: kernel 2.6.20-9 doesn't boot with sata-hd
Compiled 2.6.21-rc3 from kernel.org, booted and gparted recognized my SATA disk, dmesg: ** Attachment added: "dmesg-2.6.21-rc3" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6722650/dmesg-2.6.21-rc3.log -- kernel 2.6.20-9 doesn't boot with sata-hd https://launchpad.net/bugs/78288 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78288] Re: kernel 2.6.20-10 doesn't boot with sata-hd
Same thing for 2.6.20-10 here as well... -- kernel 2.6.20-10 doesn't boot with sata-hd https://launchpad.net/bugs/78288 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 71040] Re: rebooting instead of shutting down
The problem still exists on 2.6.20-10 -- rebooting instead of shutting down https://launchpad.net/bugs/71040 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 71040] Re: rebooting instead of shutting down
I can confirm this bug on a fresh install of Feisty Herd 5. The following methods all perform a restart instead of a shutdown: 1. Shutdown via the "shutdown, reboot, etc, menu" from gnome-panel 2. "Options -> Shut Down" from the login screen 3. "sudo shutdown -h now" from a terminal 4. "sudo shutdown -h now" from a console (Ctrl+Alt+F1) Only option is to press the power-button... ** Attachment added: "kern.log" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6600865/kern.log -- rebooting instead of shutting down https://launchpad.net/bugs/71040 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 71040] Re: rebooting instead of shutting down
I ran my test on a desktop computer containing an Asus P4P800 Motherboard/Intel P4 HT, so I don't think the problem is Acer specific. -- rebooting instead of shutting down https://launchpad.net/bugs/71040 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78288] Re: kernel 2.6.20-5 doesn't boot with sata-hd
I have a normal Asus P4P800 motherboard, with an SATA HD containing Edgy and a second IDE HD on which I installed Feisty Herd 5. When only running the IDE drive, there is no problem. When turning on the SATA drive as well, I get the "lost interrupt" and "dma_timer_expiry" errors on bootup. After adding the options noapic, nolapic and irqpoll the system boots without problems. I have attached the output of sudo lspci -vv. Is it normal that there are several different refference to my motherboard? E.g. P5P800-MX, P4P800-SE? I have the standard P4P800... ** Attachment added: "lspci-vv" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6636520/lspci-vv -- kernel 2.6.20-5 doesn't boot with sata-hd https://launchpad.net/bugs/78288 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78288] Re: kernel 2.6.20-5 doesn't boot with sata-hd
Martin, :( indeed... I downloaded the fedora LiveCD and it booted. During boot I got some I/O Buffer errors, see attachment, (on device sr0, don't know what that is on fedora), but that could have been the scratches on my CD ;) Once in Gnome, I could mount my SATA and IDE drive without a problem. Let me know if you need anything that could help you along. ** Attachment added: "dmesg" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6647706/dmesg -- kernel 2.6.20-5 doesn't boot with sata-hd https://launchpad.net/bugs/78288 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 71040] Re: rebooting instead of shutting down
I tried the LiveCD of fedora core Test2 for testing another bug. It booted kernel: Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.20-1.2949.fc7 #1 SMP Mon Feb 26 18:37:35 EST 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux I could shut down the PC with no trouble... -- rebooting instead of shutting down https://launchpad.net/bugs/71040 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 71040] Re: Kernel 2.6.20 reboots instead of shutting down
I think I might have found the source of this problem! While testing several things at once I was taking the following steps: * I was trying to install my wireless with ndiswrapper and wpasupplicant (after installation I got no connection) * I tried to shutdown the computer with the hibernate option, this halted my computer (as Carlos Fenollosa mentioned as well). * I than removed network-manager !! * When I tried the hibernate again, the computer was locked. * I unlocked the computer and tried the shutdown option, guess what, the computer halted! Could anyone please remove network-manager (network-manager-gnome and ubuntu-dekstop (meta-package, safe to remove) will also be removed) and see if this works for you too? Ps. my wireless works fine as well now (without network-manager) -- Kernel 2.6.20 reboots instead of shutting down https://launchpad.net/bugs/71040 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 71040] Re: Kernel 2.6.20 reboots instead of shutting down
Problem solved for me (Asus P4P800) -- Kernel 2.6.20 reboots instead of shutting down https://launchpad.net/bugs/71040 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92907] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! Disabling IRQ #18
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.20 Due to bug https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux- source-2.6.20/+bug/78288 I am booting 2.6.20-11 with the irqpoll option. My motherboard is an Asus P4P800. The system boots and everything seems to be working fine, even my wireless USB stick through ndiswrapper/wpasupplicant. I can access both my IDE (with feisty) and SATA(edgy) HDs. But, during boot I get the following kernel lockup message: ... [6.671840] usb 5-4: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 2 [6.804520] usb 5-4: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [6.804903] usb 2-2: USB disconnect, address 2 [ 16.215785] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! [ 16.215878] [] softlockup_tick+0x9c/0xf0 [ 16.216016] [] update_process_times+0x33/0x80 [ 16.216151] [] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x70/0x80 [ 16.216287] [] apic_timer_interrupt+0x28/0x30 [ 16.216422] [] handle_IRQ_event+0x10/0x60 [ 16.216555] [] handle_edge_irq+0xae/0x130 [ 16.216688] [] do_IRQ+0x40/0x80 [ 16.216818] [] common_interrupt+0x23/0x30 [ 16.216952] [] do_page_fault+0x349/0x5f0 [ 16.217087] [] do_page_fault+0x0/0x5f0 [ 16.217218] [] error_code+0x7c/0x90 [ 16.217349] [] unix_stream_recvmsg+0x4d3/0x560 [ 16.217483] === [ 20.367147] irq 18: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) [ 20.367236] [] __report_bad_irq+0x24/0x80 [ 20.367369] [] note_interrupt+0x25e/0x290 [ 20.367503] [] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xbd/0xd0 [ 20.367636] [] do_IRQ+0x40/0x80 [ 20.367765] [] ehci_irq+0x26/0x170 [ehci_hcd] [ 20.367902] [] common_interrupt+0x23/0x30 [ 20.368036] [] handle_IRQ_event+0x10/0x60 [ 20.368168] [] handle_edge_irq+0xae/0x130 [ 20.368301] [] do_IRQ+0x40/0x80 [ 20.368430] [] common_interrupt+0x23/0x30 [ 20.368563] [] do_page_fault+0x349/0x5f0 [ 20.368697] [] do_page_fault+0x0/0x5f0 [ 20.368828] [] error_code+0x7c/0x90 [ 20.368959] [] unix_stream_recvmsg+0x4d3/0x560 [ 20.369092] === [ 20.369170] handlers: [ 20.369244] [] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x60 [usbcore]) [ 20.369437] [] (ide_intr+0x0/0x1f0) [ 20.369616] Disabling IRQ #18 [ 20.419825] kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds [ 20.419839] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. ... ** Affects: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! Disabling IRQ #18 https://launchpad.net/bugs/92907 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92907] Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! Disabling IRQ #18
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6845488/dmesg.log -- BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! Disabling IRQ #18 https://launchpad.net/bugs/92907 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92907] Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! Disabling IRQ #18
** Attachment added: "dmidecode" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6845492/dmidecode.log -- BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! Disabling IRQ #18 https://launchpad.net/bugs/92907 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92907] Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! Disabling IRQ #18
** Attachment added: "lspci-nnvv" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6845489/lspci-nnvv -- BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! Disabling IRQ #18 https://launchpad.net/bugs/92907 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92907] Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! Disabling IRQ #18
** Attachment added: "cat/proc/interrupts" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6845490/cat_proc_interrupts -- BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! Disabling IRQ #18 https://launchpad.net/bugs/92907 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 71040] Re: Kernel 2.6.20 reboots instead of shutting down
Suspend is broken for me, the system powers-off and resumes immediately, showing the following error message: [ ] pnp: Failed to active device 00:03. [ ] pnp: Failed to active device 00:04. -- Kernel 2.6.20 reboots instead of shutting down https://launchpad.net/bugs/71040 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 71040] Re: Kernel 2.6.20 reboots instead of shutting down
Sorry, that was the Edgy kernel, I'll try 2.6.20-11 later on... -- Kernel 2.6.20 reboots instead of shutting down https://launchpad.net/bugs/71040 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 71040] Re: Kernel 2.6.20 reboots instead of shutting down
Feisty suspend: System power down, immediately resumes and comes up in a locked state. A crash report was waiting for me (vbetool), unfortunately, when I pressed "Send Report" nothing else happened. Therefore I have attached the report from /var/crash: ** Attachment added: "_usr_sbin_vbetool.0.crash" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6850857/_usr_sbin_vbetool.0.crash -- Kernel 2.6.20 reboots instead of shutting down https://launchpad.net/bugs/71040 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97092] Conflicting declarations in libc6-dev and libpthread-dev
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libpthread-dev While trying to compile kino-1.0.0 on feisty, I got the errors shown below. Removing libpthread-dev solved the conflicts and I could compile kino without a problem. Packages: libpthread-dev_2.0.7-4build1_i386 libc6-dev_2.5-0ubuntu12_i386 /usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h:43: error: 'pthread_attr_t' has a previous declaration as 'typedef union pthread_attr_t pthread_attr_t' /usr/include/pthread.h:287: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef int pthread_key_t' /usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h:109: error: 'pthread_key_t' has a previous declaration as 'typedef unsigned int pthread_key_t' /usr/include/pthread.h:289: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef int pthread_mutexattr_t' /usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h:79: error: 'pthread_mutexattr_t' has a previous declaration as 'typedef union pthread_mutexattr_t pthread_mutexattr_t' /usr/include/pthread.h:290: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef struct pthread_mutex_st* pthread_mutex_t' /usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h:73: error: 'pthread_mutex_t' has a previous declaration as 'typedef union pthread_mutex_t pthread_mutex_t' /usr/include/pthread.h:291: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef int pthread_condattr_t' /usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h:105: error: 'pthread_condattr_t' has a previous declaration as 'typedef union pthread_condattr_t pthread_condattr_t' /usr/include/pthread.h:292: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef struct pthread_cond_st* pthread_cond_t' /usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h:99: error: 'pthread_cond_t' has a previous declaration as 'typedef union pthread_cond_t pthread_cond_t' /usr/include/pthread.h:293: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef int pthread_rwlockattr_t' /usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h:142: error: 'pthread_rwlockattr_t' has a previous declaration as 'typedef union pthread_rwlockattr_t pthread_rwlockattr_t' /usr/include/pthread.h:294: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef struct pthread_rwlock_st* pthread_rwlock_t' /usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h:136: error: 'pthread_rwlock_t' has a previous declaration as 'typedef union pthread_rwlock_t pthread_rwlock_t' ** Affects: pth (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Conflicting declarations in libc6-dev and libpthread-dev https://launchpad.net/bugs/97092 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 94189] Re: Digital Output jack selected by default on a Soundblaster live
Here's my amixer output and two full lspci outputs as well. ** Attachment added: "amixer.log" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7038041/amixer.log -- Digital Output jack selected by default on a Soundblaster live https://launchpad.net/bugs/94189 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 94189] Re: Digital Output jack selected by default on a Soundblaster live
** Attachment added: "lspci-vv.log" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7038042/lspci-vv.log -- Digital Output jack selected by default on a Soundblaster live https://launchpad.net/bugs/94189 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 94189] Re: Digital Output jack selected by default on a Soundblaster live
** Attachment added: "lspci-vvn.log" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7038044/lspci-vvn.log -- Digital Output jack selected by default on a Soundblaster live https://launchpad.net/bugs/94189 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97085] Re: File roller crashes while extracting data from .tar.gz file
As to this point, I have not been able to reproduce the problem. I will continue to start file-roller using gdb to have a backtrace when it might happen again. -- File roller crashes while extracting data from .tar.gz file https://launchpad.net/bugs/97085 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 94189] Re: Digital Output jack selected by default on a Soundblaster live
I have a Creative Audigy Value and for me there was no sound after installation of Feisty. Disabling the "Digital Output Jack" on the "Switches" tab in volume control solved the problem. My guess is that the majority of the people use the analog output, so setting this by default would avoid a lot of questions... uname -a: Linux wlinux 2.6.20-12-generic #2 SMP Wed Mar 21 20:55:46 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux lspci -vv: 02:0c.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Audigy (rev 03) Subsystem: Creative Labs SB0090 Audigy Player/OEM Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- SERR- -- Digital Output jack selected by default on a Soundblaster live https://launchpad.net/bugs/94189 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78288] Re: kernel 2.6.20-11 doesn't boot with sata-hd
Upgrade to linux-image 2.6.20.12.8 fixed the problem for me as well! Great work! -- kernel 2.6.20-11 doesn't boot with sata-hd https://launchpad.net/bugs/78288 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92907] Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! Disabling IRQ #18
Upgrade to linux-image 2.6.20.12.8 fixed the source of the problem (the need to start with irqpoll) so this bug can be closed... -- BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! Disabling IRQ #18 https://launchpad.net/bugs/92907 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92907] Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! Disabling IRQ #18
Fixed by https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux- source-2.6.20/+bug/78288 ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Fix Released -- BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! Disabling IRQ #18 https://launchpad.net/bugs/92907 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 75497] Re: My PC doesn't suspend
** Attachment added: "lshw" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6861046/lshw.log -- My PC doesn't suspend https://launchpad.net/bugs/75497 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 75497] Re: My PC doesn't suspend
** Attachment added: "lshal" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6861041/lshal.log -- My PC doesn't suspend https://launchpad.net/bugs/75497 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 75497] Re: My PC doesn't suspend
** Attachment added: "lsmod" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6861044/lsmod.log -- My PC doesn't suspend https://launchpad.net/bugs/75497 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 75497] Re: My PC doesn't suspend
I am running on an Asus P4P800 motherboard and for me, after I press suspend, the system powers off, immediately resumes and comes up in a locked state. After I unlock the system, a crash report is waiting... apport suggests the following bug summary: "[apport] vbetool crashed with SIGFPE" ** Attachment added: "dmesg" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6861027/dmesg -- My PC doesn't suspend https://launchpad.net/bugs/75497 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 75497] Re: My PC doesn't suspend
** Attachment added: "part of kern.log that seems relevant" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6861032/kern.log -- My PC doesn't suspend https://launchpad.net/bugs/75497 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
