[Bug 1393752] Re: missing symbols in libssl1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.7

2014-12-09 Thread Thomas Berger
I have done more tests. The issue could be in the debian package
building helpers. The library located in the target-directory after the
build step does export all symbols. After the packaging process, all
symbols starting with an underscore are missing.  Maybe this effects
other packages too.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393752

Title:
  missing symbols in libssl1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.7

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1393752/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1393752] [NEW] missing symbols in libssl1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.7

2014-11-18 Thread Thomas Berger
Public bug reported:

_CONF_new_data is not exported.

The function definition is still in the headers:

# grep -r _CONF_new_data /usr/include/
/usr/include/openssl/conf_api.h:int _CONF_new_data(CONF *conf);

The library itself does not export the symbol:
$ readelf -Ws /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 | grep CONF_new
  1540: 0012f63084 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT   12 
NCONF_new@@OPENSSL_1.0.0

LSB Relase:
Description:Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS
Release:14.04

** Affects: openssl (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Description changed:

  _CONF_new_data is not exported.
  
  The function definition is still in the headers:
  
  # grep -r _CONF_new_data /usr/include/
  /usr/include/openssl/conf_api.h:int _CONF_new_data(CONF *conf);
  
  The library itself does not export the symbol:
  $ readelf -Ws /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 | grep CONF_new
-   1540: 0012f63084 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT   12 
NCONF_new@@OPENSSL_1.0.0
+   1540: 0012f63084 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT   12 
NCONF_new@@OPENSSL_1.0.0
+ 
+ LSB Relase:
+ Description:Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS
+ Release:14.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393752

Title:
  missing symbols in libssl1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.7

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1393752/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1393752] Re: missing symbols in libssl1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.7

2014-11-18 Thread Thomas Berger
The symbol was in libssl since 200x. In libssl0.9.8 it is still present,
but the libssl-dev headers does not match the old libssl version,

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393752

Title:
  missing symbols in libssl1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.7

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1393752/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1393752] Re: missing symbols in libssl1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.7

2014-11-18 Thread Thomas Berger
I did some more research. It looks like every symbol with a leading underscore 
disappears if build with debuild or other.
I have tried to remove all compiler and linker flags not needed or differ from 
vanilla build, but this had no effect.

As i could not see any other relevant changes within the patches, i
think the library breaks while adding symvers.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393752

Title:
  missing symbols in libssl1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.7

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1393752/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 752542] Re: ACPI DSDT info

2012-01-02 Thread Thomas Berger
Hi all. I had some discussions about Hybrid Graphics and Linux with some
nVidia Devs.

We think , the best way to implement Hybrid Graphic Systems like Optimus
is an X11 Extension, at it is not part of a unix kernel module to decide
on which Device an Xorg Call should end.

I will have a deeper look at the Xorg Source, but i think, this would be
much work to implement, and i'm new to Xorg development. If anyone has
some idea where to start, that would be fine.

I will provide some more infos about our idea soon.

Greetings, Thomas

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752542

Title:
  ACPI DSDT info

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lpbugreporter/+bug/752542/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs