[Bug 304636] Re: -hda FAT:. limited to 504MBytes

2008-12-10 Thread Riku Voipio
please send your patch to upstream at [EMAIL PROTECTED], the vvfat
code in qemu is fragile and should be carefully reviewed.

-- 
-hda FAT:. limited to 504MBytes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304636
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 349458] Re: Please provide a VFP-optimised build for ffmpeg-debian

2009-03-27 Thread Riku Voipio
This is probably one of the few libs where many versions is granted
(since the upstream provides excellent hand-optimised routines):

-armv5
-armv6+vfp
-armv7+neon

This leaves suboptimal cases for armv5+vfp users (kirkwood) and armv6
without vfp (nothing significant). Neither of these cases are on
multimedia-oriented devices (at least for now), so it should be
acceptable tradeoff.

-- 
Please provide a VFP-optimised build for ffmpeg-debian
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349458
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 37528] Re: ext3 reported as minix

2006-07-12 Thread Riku Voipio
Apparently is fixed by:

http://www.kernel.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=2f7cdff4361e65c6405a0a0e17363e9684567fa0

Which through some unfortunate circumstance does not appear to be in
dapper version of klibc..

-- 
ext3 reported as minix
https://launchpad.net/bugs/37528

--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 446552] Re: url_downloadable ignores proxy settings

2010-04-29 Thread Riku Voipio
karmic -> lucid path is still broken, since only jaunty and lucid
versions were "fixed".

Also, the *proper* fix is to use urllib2 instead of that manual code in
current lucid version. The "urllib2 doesn' support proxy auth" is poor
excuse. urrlib2 should be fixed in python instead of working it around
in applications using python... Not doing it properly gives a poor user
experience as some python apps work with proxy, some not, others work
with auth proxy and some not...

-- 
url_downloadable ignores proxy settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 568844] Re: mmap_min_addr /proc entry not visible to regular users

2010-04-30 Thread Riku Voipio
This breaks qemu linux-user as reads this file to know where to mmap:

open("/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr", O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
read(3, 0x7f82b8f7b000, 1024)   = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted)
close(3)= 0
...
mmap(0x8000, 454656, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 
3, 0) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted)
write(4, "mmap: Operation not permitted\n", 30mmap: Operation not permitted
...

-- 
mmap_min_addr /proc entry not visible to regular users
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568844
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 452175] Re: Random segfaults when using ld.so explicitly to start a program

2009-11-20 Thread Riku Voipio
@kees If the problem does not appear on 64-bit, then it likely will not
appear on the 32-bit generic-pae kernel (assuming this is on a system
with PAE and the NX bit).

Correct, this is reproducible on 32bit kernel but not on a 64bit kernel.

-- 
Random segfaults when using ld.so explicitly to start a program
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452175
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 475077] Re: hald seg faults after upgrade to karmic koala

2009-12-02 Thread Riku Voipio
Same crash here, apt-get upgrade after earlier karmic upgrade.

** Attachment added: "hald output"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36331802/hald.out

-- 
hald seg faults after upgrade to karmic koala
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475077
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 475077] Re: hald seg faults after upgrade to karmic koala

2009-12-02 Thread Riku Voipio
Apparently removing the following file make the crash go away.

/usr/share/kubuntu-default-settings/hal-policy-ntfs-config-write-
policy.fdi

do not close as duplicate, hald shoudn't SEGFAULT no matter how bad
files given.

-- 
hald seg faults after upgrade to karmic koala
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475077
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491353] [NEW] karmic upgrade: hal-policy-ntfs-config-write-policy.fdi link breaks hal

2009-12-02 Thread Riku Voipio
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: kubuntu-default-settings

Hald appers to be really unhappy about the the fdi file linked:

/usr/share/kubuntu-default-settings/hal-policy-ntfs-config-write-
policy.fdi

Removing the symlink makes hald start again without segfaulting. See:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hal/+bug/475077

for details

** Affects: kubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
karmic upgrade: hal-policy-ntfs-config-write-policy.fdi link breaks hal
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491353
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kubuntu-default-settings in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 445432] Re: dch -l fails due to ubuntu patching

2009-10-07 Thread Riku Voipio

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33227738/Dependencies.txt

-- 
dch -l fails due to ubuntu patching
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445432
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 445432] [NEW] dch -l fails due to ubuntu patching

2009-10-07 Thread Riku Voipio
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: devscripts

dch -l foo

expected:

hello (2.2-3foo1) karmic; urgency=low

actual:

hello (2.2-3ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: devscripts 2.10.48ubuntu1~jaunty1
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 LANGUAGE=
SourcePackage: devscripts
Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic x86_64

** Affects: devscripts (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
dch -l fails due to ubuntu patching
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445432
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 470273] [NEW] update-notifier-kde fails to use proxy

2009-11-02 Thread Riku Voipio
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: update-notifier-kde

Update from jaunty to karmic fails.

Update-manager-kde asks if I want to update to latest "9.10" release.
Selected ok, and upgrade hangs.

strace shows:

connect(11, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(80),
sin_addr=inet_addr("193.166.3.5")}, 16^C 

proxy has been configured in the "http_proxy" env variable, gconf key
and kde control center, /etc/apt/apt.conf,  yet update-manager chose to
connect directly to internet.

normal security updates via update-manager-kde / apt-get install
commends work fine.

packages installed on jaunty:

rc  update-manager 1:0.93.34
  GNOME application that manages apt updates
ii  update-manager-core1:0.111.9
  manage release upgrades
ii  update-manager-kde 1:0.111.9
  Support modules for Update Notifier KDE
ii  update-manager-text1:0.111.9
  Text application that manages apt updates

** Affects: update-notifier-kde (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
update-notifier-kde fails to use proxy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470273
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 396187] Re: url_downloadable does not respect proxy

2009-11-02 Thread Riku Voipio
After adding the patch in comment #2 and the fix comment #2, it works
for me.

Quite sad that this bug was not fixed in one month after the patch was
submitted :'(

-- 
url_downloadable does not respect proxy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396187
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 452175] Re: Random segfaults when using ld.so explicitly to start a program

2009-11-02 Thread Riku Voipio
If it is not a kernel bug, howcome it only appears with a Ubuntu patched
kernel? At the minimum, it should be bisected which kernel patch broke
bash.

-- 
Random segfaults when using ld.so explicitly to start a program
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452175
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1707409] Re: testsuite fails under qemu (SIGILL) works fine on real hw [missing getrandom 384 syscall]

2017-08-09 Thread Riku Voipio
There is two issues being mixed up here

1) launchpad buildd changes.

notmuch build system appears to be confused by the new enviroment. It
appears ubuntu has chosen "armhf chroot on arm64 machine" approach,
which would mean qemu system call emulation is not involved. if it is -
it a buildd configuration error.

My suspicion is that notmuch testsuite gets confused in armhf-on-arm64
setup. This setup is a bit shoddy and launchpad should really run the
armhf builders with armhf kernel, which kvm on arm64 host can easily do.

2) The "unsupported syscall" errror.

the pbuilder-based cross-build uses qemu linux-user, so the build env is
not equivalent to what is launchpad.

syscall 384 is getrandom, which qemu does support. You may have too old
qemu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707409

Title:
  testsuite fails under qemu (SIGILL) works fine on real hw [missing
  getrandom 384 syscall]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-buildd/+bug/1707409/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1236746] Re: systemtap needs porting for Aarch64

2014-05-29 Thread Riku Voipio
** Changed in: linaro-aarch64
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1236746

Title:
  systemtap needs porting for Aarch64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1236746/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1160434] Re: firefox needs porting for aarch64

2014-05-29 Thread Riku Voipio
** Changed in: linaro-aarch64
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1160434

Title:
  firefox needs porting for aarch64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1160434/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1036645] Re: /usr/bin/xargs: rm: Argument list too long during make distclean in cross chroot

2016-08-23 Thread Riku Voipio
This was fixed in qemu 2.5 with commit of subject: linux-user: remove
MAX_ARG_PAGES limit


** Changed in: qemu-linaro (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

** Changed in: qemu-linaro
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036645

Title:
  /usr/bin/xargs: rm: Argument list too long during make distclean in
  cross chroot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu-linaro/+bug/1036645/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 955379] Re: cmake hangs with qemu-arm-static

2016-06-08 Thread Riku Voipio
Please try the latest qemu git HEAD, Timothys and Peters fixes have been
merged in.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955379

Title:
  cmake hangs with qemu-arm-static

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/955379/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 955379] Re: cmake hangs with qemu-arm-static

2016-06-08 Thread Riku Voipio
A prebuilt package of qemu-user built statically at:

http://repo.linaro.org/ubuntu/linaro-tools/pool/main/q/qemu/qemu-user-
static_2.6.0+git931+g9bbbf64-1linarojessie1_amd64.deb

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955379

Title:
  cmake hangs with qemu-arm-static

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/955379/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 987280] [NEW] Add cross-compile and parallel build support to nux

2012-04-23 Thread Riku Voipio
Public bug reported:

Since nux is quite slow to build on arm, having it cross-compilable
would be nice. The attached changes to debian/rules make it possible by:

1) exporting the correct pkg-config
2) disabling tests explicitly (this was already implicit as the gtest and other 
components needed for complile are missing)
3) as extra bonus, support "DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=3 " syntax for multicore 
building.

** Affects: nux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987280

Title:
  Add cross-compile and parallel build support to nux

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/+bug/987280/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 987280] Re: Add cross-compile and parallel build support to nux

2012-04-23 Thread Riku Voipio
** Patch added: "nux.crosscompile.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987280/+attachment/3099948/+files/nux.crosscompile.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987280

Title:
  Add cross-compile and parallel build support to nux

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/+bug/987280/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 987284] [NEW] Change unity-2d test to file test

2012-04-23 Thread Riku Voipio
Public bug reported:

The following patch is mostly a non-op, it makes the check depend on the
file being output, rather than the exit code. This is relevant in cases
the /usr/lib/nux/unity_support_test crashes on exit (as happens with ARM
MALI drivers atm). While the mali code is being fixed, this change
allows working around the issue. Since we think the check change could
be considered a cleanup (always check the files rather than exit code),
we are submitting it here for consideration.

** Affects: nux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987284

Title:
  Change unity-2d test to file test

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/+bug/987284/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 987284] Re: Change unity-2d test to file test

2012-04-23 Thread Riku Voipio
** Patch added: "nux-snowball.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987284/+attachment/3099952/+files/nux-snowball.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987284

Title:
  Change unity-2d test to file test

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/+bug/987284/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 987280] Re: Add cross-compile and parallel build support to nux

2012-04-24 Thread Riku Voipio
Hi,

> Riku, you should probably set this bug to assigned to yourself and
maybe set it to "In Progress"

I'm not a maintainer/developer in nux so I don't think I can assign it
to myself?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987280

Title:
  Add cross-compile and parallel build support to nux

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/+bug/987280/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 957028] [NEW] Fix cross-compiling kernel

2012-03-16 Thread Riku Voipio
Public bug reported:

Without this patch trying to cross-build ubuntu kernel source with:

sudo apt-get install gcc-arm-linux-gnueabi
dpkg-buildpackage -aarmel

would fail when building perf due to incorrect "make $(CROSS_COMPILE)"
line. Unfortunately that is not enough, as binutils-dev is not multiarch
ready atm.

In order to cross-compile kernel in precise, building tools need to be
disabled (until binutils-dev is converted to multiarch).  The attached
patch does that, and while at it replaces the incorrect "make
$(CROSS_COMPILE)" stanzas with $(kmake).

Please consider for you next precise upload so that precise kernels
packages can be cross-compiled without hacking.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/957028

Title:
  Fix cross-compiling kernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/957028/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 957028] Re: Fix cross-compiling kernel

2012-03-16 Thread Riku Voipio
** Patch added: "cross-compile support patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/957028/+attachment/2881266/+files/linux-cross.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/957028

Title:
  Fix cross-compiling kernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/957028/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1077796] Re: /bin/kill no longer works with negative PID

2013-09-13 Thread Riku Voipio
This should be reassigned to procps, /bin/kill is not in coreutils.

In debian this has been fixed procps-ng 3.3.4.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1077796

Title:
  /bin/kill no longer works with negative PID

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/1077796/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1137510]

2013-12-06 Thread Riku Voipio
Sorry, it seems the original patch was incomplete. While some distros
use xfree86.cf, others take xorg.cf

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1137510

Title:
  xorg-cf needs porting

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1137510/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1137510]

2013-12-06 Thread Riku Voipio
Created attachment 90233
add DefaultGcc2AArch64Opt to xorg.cf

This is on top of the already accepted patch. Alternative would be just
remove all references to DefaultGcc2AArch64Opt, since there is nothing
unique about aarch64 optimization options.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1137510

Title:
  xorg-cf needs porting

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1137510/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1137510] Re: xorg-cf needs porting

2013-08-13 Thread Riku Voipio
** Changed in: linaro-aarch64
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1137510

Title:
  xorg-cf needs porting

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1137510/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1440536] Re: Oops __d_lookup+0x88/0x194

2015-10-23 Thread Riku Voipio
This has also been reproduced on wilu 4.2.0-16-generic #19-Ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1440536

Title:
  Oops __d_lookup+0x88/0x194

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1440536/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 839303] Re: tsconf should be Multi-Arch: foreign

2012-02-14 Thread Riku Voipio
Fixed package is in debian/experimental

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839303

Title:
  tsconf should be Multi-Arch: foreign

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tslib/+bug/839303/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1415481] [NEW] default mmap_min_addr for arm64 prevents running arm32 applications

2015-01-28 Thread Riku Voipio
Public bug reported:

Executing 32-bit arm binaries as user fails on arm64:

# file hello
hello: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, EABI5 version 1 (SYSV),
statically linked, for GNU/Linux 2.6.32,
BuildID[sha1]=c37a3b366d645eee600963a535370fa0bad9b2c0, not stripped
# ./hello
hello world
# su - linaro
$ /root/hello
Segmentation fault

Root cause was identified to /etc/sysctl.d/10-zeropage.conf, which is
set on arm64 to 65536. To run legacy binaries, this should be set to
32768 like on armhf anr armel.

Reference discussion:

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-
kernel/2015-January/320454.html

Affects trusty, utopic and vivid

** Affects: procps (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1415481

Title:
  default mmap_min_addr for arm64 prevents running arm32 applications

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1415481/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1415481] Re: default mmap_min_addr for arm64 prevents running arm32 applications

2015-01-30 Thread Riku Voipio
Hi Brian,

I've installed the procps package on trusty arm64 machine, rebooted and
verified the correct value is set in /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr. I
haven't tested on utopic but see no reason why it wouldn't work there as
well.

Riku

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1415481

Title:
  default mmap_min_addr for arm64 prevents running arm32 applications

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1415481/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1396470] [NEW] please enable CONFIG_VIRTIO_MMIO on armmp

2014-11-25 Thread Riku Voipio
Public bug reported:

Hi,

The current armmp (linux-image-3.16.0-26-generic_3.16.0-26.34_armhf.deb)
could have virtio-mmio enabled for faster vm guests. Currenlty it seems
to have:

CONFIG_NET_9P_VIRTIO=m
CONFIG_VIRTIO_BLK=y
CONFIG_SCSI_VIRTIO=m
CONFIG_VIRTIO_NET=y
CONFIG_CAIF_VIRTIO=m
CONFIG_VIRTIO_CONSOLE=y
CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_VIRTIO=m
CONFIG_VIRTIO=y
CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI=y
# CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON is not set
# CONFIG_VIRTIO_MMIO is not set

Now using virtio net and block is not possible, and you have to revert
to emulated devices.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1396470

Title:
  please enable CONFIG_VIRTIO_MMIO on armmp

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1396470/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1396470] Re: please enable CONFIG_VIRTIO_MMIO on armmp

2014-12-02 Thread Riku Voipio
Hi Paolo,

Thanks for quick update.

previous boot time (with SD emulation): Up 113.00 seconds.
with your kernel and virtio disk:Up 78.19 seconds.

So yes, works perfectly!

On 2 December 2014 at 13:08, Paolo Pisati <1396...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> can you try one of these kernels and report if it solves the problem for
> you?
>
> http://people.canonical.com/~ppisati/lp1396470/
>
> thanks!
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1396470
>
> Title:
>   please enable CONFIG_VIRTIO_MMIO on armmp
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1396470/+subscriptions

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1396470

Title:
  please enable CONFIG_VIRTIO_MMIO on armmp

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1396470/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1317090] Re: qemu fails on ELF files with no section headers

2014-05-09 Thread Riku Voipio
Hi Craig,

On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:53:38PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 7 May 2014 15:48, Peter Maydell  wrote:
> > On 7 May 2014 15:34, Paul Jimenez <1317...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> >> Bug description:
> >>   Using the latest version of qemu-user-static from trusty, 2.0.0+dfsg-
> >>   2ubuntu1.
> >>
> >>   Reported to qemu and patch submitted long ago by the guy who wrote 
> >> http://www.devttys0.com/2011/12/qemu-vs-sstrip/
> >>   but apparently dropped on the floor - at least, I can't find it in any 
> >> qemu bug tracker anywhere.  It's now keeping me from running openwrt 
> >> binaries under qemu-arm-static (because the openwrt guys strip section 
> >> headers to save space on their teeny embedded boxes).  It's a one-line 
> >> patch, reproduced here:
> >>
> >>   --- qemu/linux-user/elfload.c   2011-12-02 15:16:07.637541215 -0500
> >>   +++ qemu-patched/linux-user/elfload.c   2011-12-02 15:27:24.061522798 
> >> -0500
> >>   @@ -1068,7 +1068,6 @@ static bool elf_check_ehdr(struct elfhdr
> >>return (elf_check_arch(ehdr->e_machine)
> >>&& ehdr->e_ehsize == sizeof(struct elfhdr)
> >>&& ehdr->e_phentsize == sizeof(struct elf_phdr)
> >>   -&& ehdr->e_shentsize == sizeof(struct elf_shdr)
> >>&& (ehdr->e_type == ET_EXEC || ehdr->e_type == ET_DYN));
> >>}
> >
> > Yeah; the equivalent kernel code:
> > http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.14.3/fs/binfmt_elf.c#L595
> > doesn't check the section header size, and nor should QEMU.
> 
> Original 2011 patch:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-trivial/2011-12/msg00025.html
 
> (hitting the 'reply' button gets us back the original email
> address to fix up the signed-off-by line with, so we can
> credit the fix to Craig properly.)

Can you resend the patch with your Signed-Off-By: ?

Riku

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1317090

Title:
  qemu fails on ELF files with no section headers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1317090/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1317090] Re: qemu fails on ELF files with no section headers

2014-05-09 Thread Riku Voipio
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 09:20:54AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 9 May 2014 09:14, Riku Voipio  wrote:
> > Hi Craig,
> >
> > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:53:38PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> Original 2011 patch:
> >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-trivial/2011-12/msg00025.html
> >
> >> (hitting the 'reply' button gets us back the original email
> >> address to fix up the signed-off-by line with, so we can
> >> credit the fix to Craig properly.)
> >
> > Can you resend the patch with your Signed-Off-By: ?
 
> Seems a bit unnecessary to force a resend -- the original
> has the signoff, it's just the mailing list archive has mangled
> it, so we can just restore it...

Right, missed that bit. Reconstructing the patch..

Riku

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1317090

Title:
  qemu fails on ELF files with no section headers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1317090/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1154025] Re: Install PIC version of libbfd.a

2014-04-04 Thread Riku Voipio
It seems oprofile was "fixed" - this by dynamically linking against
libbfd, which explicitly isn't allowed.

libbfd_pic.a is needed for mutrace as well.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1154025

Title:
  Install PIC version of libbfd.a

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1154025/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1236748] Re: valgrind needs Aarch64 port

2014-02-06 Thread Riku Voipio
** Changed in: linaro-aarch64
   Status: Triaged => In Progress

** Changed in: linaro-aarch64
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1236748

Title:
  valgrind needs Aarch64 port

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1236748/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1279307] Re: fdk-aac needs porting for aarch64

2014-02-12 Thread Riku Voipio
With this patch, fdk-aac builds. It however warns that it might be
extremely slow.

** Also affects: fdk-aac (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Patch added: "aarch64 basic support"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fdk-aac/+bug/1279307/+attachment/3978390/+files/aarch64.patch

** Changed in: linaro-aarch64
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: linaro-aarch64
   Importance: Undecided => Low

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1279307

Title:
  fdk-aac needs porting for aarch64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1279307/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1236746] Re: systemtap needs porting for Aarch64

2014-02-13 Thread Riku Voipio
systemtap support appears to be upstream;

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=systemtap.git;a=commitdiff;h=508059f04842ed85d10bfbec8a9c688d57368860

** Changed in: linaro-aarch64
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: linaro-aarch64
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1236746

Title:
  systemtap needs porting for Aarch64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1236746/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1072696] Re: Issue with Audacious play mp3 on ac100

2014-02-17 Thread Riku Voipio
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #738981
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=738981

** Also affects: mpg123 (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=738981
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1072696

Title:
  Issue with Audacious play mp3 on ac100

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mpg123/+bug/1072696/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1137510] Re: xorg-cf needs porting

2013-11-19 Thread Riku Voipio
Hi Marcin,

Try the attached patch (on top of latest upstream). This defines 
DefaultGcc2AArch64Opt in xorg.cf . linux.cf includes xorg.cf rather than 
xfree86.cf where this was defined in the original patch.
'


** Patch added: "Define DefaultGcc2AArch64Opt in xorg.cf"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1137510/+attachment/3912458/+files/fix-aarch.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1137510

Title:
  xorg-cf needs porting

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1137510/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1137510] Re: xorg-cf needs porting

2013-11-19 Thread Riku Voipio
Alternatively we could just skip defining and using
DefaultGcc2AArch64Opt at all, it seems only used if the arch needs
special optimization parameters (which we don't)

** Changed in: linaro-aarch64
   Status: Fix Released => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1137510

Title:
  xorg-cf needs porting

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1137510/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1370752] Re: openafs needs porting for Aarch64

2014-09-17 Thread Riku Voipio
Verified that this indeed needs porting. src/lwp/process.s needs a
version for aarch64. This probably needs to be done by someone who
actively uses openafs to get it properly tested.

** Changed in: linaro-aarch64
   Importance: Undecided => Low

** Changed in: linaro-aarch64
   Status: New => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1370752

Title:
  openafs needs porting for Aarch64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1370752/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1160434] Re: firefox needs porting for aarch64

2014-06-19 Thread Riku Voipio
Supposedly Released in Firefox 30 - thanks to tireless work from Marcin!

** Changed in: linaro-aarch64
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1160434

Title:
  firefox needs porting for aarch64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1160434/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1102107] Re: Add basic arm64 support

2013-01-25 Thread Riku Voipio
The patch is probably broken.

it should have SIXTY_FOUR_BIT instead of  BN_LLONG

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1102107

Title:
  Add basic arm64 support

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1102107/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1102107] Re: Add basic arm64 support

2013-01-25 Thread Riku Voipio
** Also affects: linaro-aarch64
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1102107

Title:
  Add basic arm64 support

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1102107/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1102107] Re: Add basic arm64 support

2013-01-28 Thread Riku Voipio
Updated patch - now with 64bit pointers.

** Patch added: "openssl_1.0.1c-4ubuntu2-arm64support2.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1102107/+attachment/3504359/+files/openssl_1.0.1c-4ubuntu2-arm64support2.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1102107

Title:
  Add basic arm64 support

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1102107/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1074313] Re: ldconfig complains about unknown machine 183

2013-02-28 Thread Riku Voipio
** Changed in: linaro-aarch64
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Changed in: linaro-aarch64
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074313

Title:
  ldconfig complains about unknown machine 183

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1074313/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1102107] Re: Add basic arm64 support into OpenSSL

2013-02-28 Thread Riku Voipio
** Changed in: linaro-aarch64
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1102107

Title:
  Add basic arm64 support into OpenSSL

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1102107/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 859512] [NEW] Please convert libdbusmenu to multiarch

2011-09-26 Thread Riku Voipio
Public bug reported:

Libdbusmenu is still installing libraries to /usr/lib instead of the
multarch compatible /usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) directory. The
attached patch does the conversion.

** Affects: libdbusmenu (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859512

Title:
  Please convert libdbusmenu to multiarch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdbusmenu/+bug/859512/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 859512] Re: Please convert libdbusmenu to multiarch

2011-09-26 Thread Riku Voipio
** Patch added: "Multiarch conversion patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859512/+attachment/2462441/+files/libdbusmenu-ma.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859512

Title:
  Please convert libdbusmenu to multiarch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdbusmenu/+bug/859512/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 859600] [NEW] Please convert gnome-keyring to multiarch

2011-09-26 Thread Riku Voipio
Public bug reported:

lgnome-keyring is still installing libraries to /usr/lib instead of the
multarch compatible /usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) directory. The
attached patch does the conversion.

** Affects: gnome-keyring (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859600

Title:
  Please convert gnome-keyring to multiarch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-keyring/+bug/859600/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 859600] Re: Please convert gnome-keyring to multiarch

2011-09-26 Thread Riku Voipio
** Attachment added: "Multiarch conversion patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859600/+attachment/2462817/+files/gnome-keyring-ma.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859600

Title:
  Please convert gnome-keyring to multiarch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-keyring/+bug/859600/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 859599] [NEW] Please convert libgnome-keyring to multiarch

2011-09-26 Thread Riku Voipio
Public bug reported:

libgnome-keyring is still installing libraries to /usr/lib instead of
the multarch compatible /usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) directory. The
attached patch does the conversion.

** Affects: libgnome-keyring (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859599

Title:
  Please convert libgnome-keyring to multiarch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgnome-keyring/+bug/859599/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 859599] Re: Please convert libgnome-keyring to multiarch

2011-09-26 Thread Riku Voipio
** Patch added: "Multiarch conversion patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859599/+attachment/2462816/+files/libgnome-keyring-ma.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859599

Title:
  Please convert libgnome-keyring to multiarch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgnome-keyring/+bug/859599/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 829307] [NEW] Please convert libbluetooth3 to multiarch

2011-08-19 Thread Riku Voipio
Public bug reported:

bluez was partially converted to multiarch, but the actual library still
isn't multiarch. Attached patch fixes that. bluez-cups and bluez-
gstreamer are still left unconverted.

** Affects: bluez (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829307

Title:
  Please convert libbluetooth3 to multiarch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/829307/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 829307] Re: Please convert libbluetooth3 to multiarch

2011-08-19 Thread Riku Voipio
Set libdir, update depends, add pre-depends and change .install paths.


** Patch added: "bluez-ma.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/829307/+attachment/2291409/+files/bluez-ma.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829307

Title:
  Please convert libbluetooth3 to multiarch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/829307/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 875928] Re: mutrace: uninstallable as it strictly depends on a specific binutils version

2011-10-17 Thread Riku Voipio
mutrace 0.2.0-2 as just uploaded to debian fixes this by linking
statically against libbfd. Someone needs to do the magic sync to fix it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875928

Title:
  mutrace: uninstallable as it strictly depends on a specific binutils
  version

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutrace/+bug/875928/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1042162] [NEW] Please enable arm assembler optimisations in openssl

2012-08-27 Thread Riku Voipio
Public bug reported:

Openssl has some rather nice arm assembler optimizations. For example
on pandaboard (omap4430), the following speed improvements were made:

benchmarkdebian   with patch
sha1 55836.67k -> 73599.08k
aes-128 cbc  18451.11k -> 36305.34k
aes-256 cbc  13552.30k -> 27108.31k
sha256   20092.25k -> 43469.45k
sha512   8052.74k  -> 37194.28k
rsa 1024 1904.2v/S -> 3650.5v/s

The attached patch enables using arm assembler, as well as removes the
armeb configuration as the armeb port is long dead.

The patch applies to the Quantal version of openssl.

** Affects: openssl (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: openssl (Debian)
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042162

Title:
  Please enable arm assembler optimisations in openssl

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1042162/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1042162] Re: Please enable arm assembler optimisations in openssl

2012-08-27 Thread Riku Voipio
** Patch added: "Patch to enable arm assembler."
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042162/+attachment/3278775/+files/openssl.patch

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #676533
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676533

** Also affects: openssl (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676533
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042162

Title:
  Please enable arm assembler optimisations in openssl

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1042162/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1035701] Re: grilo plugins should be enabled in Totem

2012-08-29 Thread Riku Voipio
It is rather amusing, that ubuntu prides itself as "it just works"
distro - yet grilo and upnp in totem work out of box in debian, and
someone decided to explicitly disable in ubuntu...

Add grilo back. UPNP and friends should just work out of box, currently
people write horrible instructions like the one below to make it happen:

http://bernaerts.dyndns.org/linux/240-ubuntu-precise-upnp-dlna-client

Instead, just apply this patch to totem packaging.

** Patch added: "Re-add grilo support."
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/1035701/+attachment/3281688/+files/fix-grilo.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035701

Title:
  grilo plugins should be enabled in Totem

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/1035701/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 922946] Re: Ubuntu 11.10 omap/armv7 OpenSSL built without ARMv4 optimization

2012-06-12 Thread Riku Voipio
I have attached a fix to the debian bug. Note that the "armv4l" in the
upstream means "everything from armv4 -> armv7, including runtime
detection of neon".

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #676533
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676533

** Also affects: openssl (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676533
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922946

Title:
  Ubuntu 11.10 omap/armv7 OpenSSL built without ARMv4 optimization

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/922946/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 923779] [NEW] cross-linker behaviour differs from native linked

2012-01-30 Thread Riku Voipio
Public bug reported:

This requires a bit of background to understand. From the man page of
ld(1).

-snip-
   -rpath-link=dir
   When using ELF or SunOS, one shared library may require another.
   This happens when an "ld -shared" link includes a shared library as
   one of the input files.

   When the linker encounters such a dependency when doing a non-
   shared, non-relocatable link, it will automatically try to locate
   the required shared library and include it in the link, if it is
   not included explicitly.  In such a case, the -rpath-link option
   specifies the first set of directories to search.  The -rpath-link
   option may specify a sequence of directory names either by
   specifying a list of names separated by colons, or by appearing
   multiple times.

   This option should be used with caution as it overrides the search
   path that may have been hard compiled into a shared library. In
   such a case it is possible to use unintentionally a different
   search path than the runtime linker would do.

   The linker uses the following search paths to locate required
   shared libraries:

   1.  Any directories specified by -rpath-link options.

   2.  Any directories specified by -rpath options.  The difference
   between -rpath and -rpath-link is that directories specified by
   -rpath options are included in the executable and used at
   runtime, whereas the -rpath-link option is only effective at
   link time. Searching -rpath in this way is only supported by
   native linkers and cross linkers which have been configured
   with the --with-sysroot option.

   3.  On an ELF system, for native linkers, if the -rpath and
   -rpath-link options were not used, search the contents of the
   environment variable "LD_RUN_PATH".

   4.  On SunOS, if the -rpath option was not used, search any
   directories specified using -L options.

   5.  For a native linker, the search the contents of the environment
   variable "LD_LIBRARY_PATH".

   6.  For a native ELF linker, the directories in "DT_RUNPATH" or
   "DT_RPATH" of a shared library are searched for shared
   libraries needed by it. The "DT_RPATH" entries are ignored if
   "DT_RUNPATH" entries exist.

   7.  The default directories, normally /lib and /usr/lib.

   8.  For a native linker on an ELF system, if the file
   /etc/ld.so.conf exists, the list of directories found in that
   file.

   If the required shared library is not found, the linker will issue
   a warning and continue with the link.
-snip-

Our concern are the sections 3, 5, 6, 8 and indirectly 7 (/usr/lib/arm-
linux-gnueabi isn't apparently considered default directory).

The problem is, that while we search for libraries in /usr/lib/arm-
linux-gnueabi, the search is not _recursive_. Take  case that we link
against -lhi, which in turn uses symbols from -lhi. With a native
toolchain, we can just build by giving "gcc -lhi". With current cross-
toolchain, that is not enough.

The attached testcase, which succeeds on native ld, will fail with the
cross-toolchain with:

-snip-
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.6/../../../../arm-linux-gnueabi/bin/ld: 
warning: liblo.so, needed by /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libhi.so, not found 
(try using -rpath or -rpath-link)   

   
/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libhi.so: undefined reference to `alowcall'  

  
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
-snip-

Changing the last line to either:

arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc hiuser.c -llo -lhi -o foouser
arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc hiuser.c -Wl,-rpath-link=/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi  -lhi 
-o foouser

Will make the build succeed.

We have a bunch of options here:

1) patch ld to make cross-ld behave identically to ld. This can be done by 
setting "NATIVE=yes" in genscripts.sh of binutils
2) add /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi to default directories (after quick search 
didn't find out how).  This could still risk breaking if there are packages 
that use LD_LIBRARY_PATH during buildtime
3) tell people to change their buildscripts to add all libraries to the linking 
command line. This is tricky, as most people don't select the -lflags them 
self, they come from pkg-config et all. Further more, people have been actively 
endorsing doing the complete opposite, eg. removing all unnecessary -lflags to 
cut down package dependencies. 
4) copy the ld wrapper from scratchbox that adds the default directories and 
LD_LIBRA

[Bug 923779] Re: cross-linker behaviour differs from native linked

2012-01-30 Thread Riku Voipio
** Attachment added: "test-toolchain.sh"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923779/+attachment/2701364/+files/test-toolchain.sh

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923779

Title:
  cross-linker behaviour differs from native linked

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/armel-cross-toolchain-base/+bug/923779/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 919264] Re: gconf2 multiarch cross-compile helper

2012-01-20 Thread Riku Voipio
** Attachment added: "gconf.diff"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919264/+attachment/2684159/+files/gconf.diff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919264

Title:
  gconf2 multiarch cross-compile helper

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gconf/+bug/919264/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 919264] [NEW] gconf2 multiarch cross-compile helper

2012-01-20 Thread Riku Voipio
Public bug reported:

As full multiarch conversion of gconf2 is taking time to happen, please
apply this patch to make installation of foreign arch libgconf2-dev
possible. The two changes are:

make gconf2-common Multi-Arch: foreign.

remove gconf2 dependency from libgconf2-dev

I'm still running an full compile to ensure that the latter does not
cause any FTBFS, but as far as I see, when building software against
libgconf2-dev, one does not use binaries from gonf2.

** Affects: gconf (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: multiarch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919264

Title:
  gconf2 multiarch cross-compile helper

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gconf/+bug/919264/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 910856] [NEW] Please convert startup-notification to multiarch

2012-01-02 Thread Riku Voipio
Public bug reported:

please apple the attached patch to startup-notification to cinvert
startup-notification to multiarch.

** Affects: startup-notification (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/910856

Title:
  Please convert startup-notification to multiarch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/startup-notification/+bug/910856/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 910856] Re: Please convert startup-notification to multiarch

2012-01-02 Thread Riku Voipio
** Patch added: "Multiarch conversion patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/910856/+attachment/2654096/+files/startup-notification.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/910856

Title:
  Please convert startup-notification to multiarch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/startup-notification/+bug/910856/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1102107] Re: Add basic arm64 support into OpenSSL

2013-04-30 Thread Riku Voipio
Hi Ard,

Thanks, good catch - apparently we have the correct item OpenEmbedded
but the Ubuntu patch has wrong one. Not sure how it ended up there.
Updated patched attached.

We would still need someone to write the assembler code to take
advantage of the ARMv8 AES and SHA instructions.

** Patch added: "openssl.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1102107/+attachment/3659897/+files/openssl.patch

** Changed in: linaro-aarch64
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: linaro-oe
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1102107

Title:
  Add basic arm64 support into OpenSSL

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1102107/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1074313] Re: ldconfig complains about unknown machine 183

2013-04-30 Thread Riku Voipio
** Changed in: linaro-aarch64
   Importance: Undecided => Low

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074313

Title:
  ldconfig complains about unknown machine 183

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1074313/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1091823] Re: libgcc2.c includes limits.h without need

2013-04-30 Thread Riku Voipio
** Changed in: linaro-aarch64
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: linaro-aarch64
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091823

Title:
  libgcc2.c includes limits.h without need

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1091823/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1034734] Re: flash-kernel shouldn't prompt the user when updating initramfs in case there's no valid /etc/fstab

2012-11-30 Thread Riku Voipio
I'm now getting this with l-m-c and quantal. flash-kernel si version:
3.0~rc.4ubuntu27

Setting up linux-image-3.7-0-linaro-lt-vexpressdt-rtsm (3.7-0.0~RC6linaro1) ...
Running depmod.
update-initramfs: deferring update (hook will be called later)
Examining /etc/kernel/postinst.d.
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools 
3.7-0-linaro-lt-vexpressdt-rtsm /boot/vmlinuz-3.7-0-linaro-lt-vexpressdt-rtsm
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.7-0-linaro-lt-vexpressdt-rtsm
/bin/df: Warning: cannot read table of mounted file systems: No such file or 
directory
Warning: root device  does not exist

Press Ctrl-C to abort build, or Enter to continue

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1034734

Title:
  flash-kernel shouldn't prompt the user when updating initramfs in case
  there's no valid /etc/fstab

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flash-kernel/+bug/1034734/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 934433] Re: [FFe] Multi-Arch version of elfutils wanted for Precise

2012-03-06 Thread Riku Voipio
** Summary changed:

- elfutils needs Multi-Arch support
+ [FFe] Multi-Arch version of elfutils wanted for Precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934433

Title:
  [FFe] Multi-Arch version of elfutils wanted for Precise

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/934433/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 934433] Re: [FFe] Multi-Arch version of elfutils wanted for Precise

2012-03-06 Thread Riku Voipio
** Description changed:

+ ===
+ This is a feature freeze exception for elfutils in precise:
+ ===
+ 
  The current elfutils (0.152-1ubuntu2) in precise does not have Multi-
  Arch support, so if the 32-bit lib is needed on a 64-bit system, it
  cannot be installed via libelf1:i386.
  
- There's a current bug report open with debian (debian bug #657139) with
- a patch that seems close but needs some tweaking.
- 
  This is necessary for some older 32-bit apps we'll need to run once
  precise is out that depend on the 32-bit version of libelf.so.1.
  
- Thanks and please let me know if I can provide any other info.
+ This is also a blocker for cross-compiling kernel. As kernel is the most
+ often cross-compiled piece of software, it would be rather important to
+ get it working out-of-box in precise.
+ 
+ Minimal patch to add multi-arch support attached in the first message. While 
this creates a divergence from Debian, there is nothing "special" in the patch 
that needs
+ preserving once synchronizing with Debian next time. It can be simply 
replaced with the Debian package for precise + 1.
+ 
+ Build logs and packages available at Linaro overlay ppa:
+ 
+ https://launchpad.net/~linaro-
+ maintainers/+archive/overlay/+sourcepub/2290267/+listing-archive-extra

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934433

Title:
  [FFe] Multi-Arch version of elfutils wanted for Precise

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/934433/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 948790] [NEW] multiarch library directories no longer searched

2012-03-07 Thread Riku Voipio
Public bug reported:

With gcc-4.6-armel-cross 1.58:

$ arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc hello.c -o hello -lbz2
$

With With gcc-4.6-armel-cross 1.59:

$ arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc hello.c -o hello -lbz2
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.6/../../../../arm-linux-gnueabi/bin/ld: cannot 
find -lbz2
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
$

$ arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc hello.c -o hello -lbz2 -L/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi
$

** Affects: gcc-4.6-armel-cross (Ubuntu)
 Importance: High
 Assignee: Marcin Juszkiewicz (hrw)
 Status: Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948790

Title:
  multiarch library directories no longer searched

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.6-armel-cross/+bug/948790/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 934433] Re: elfutils needs Multi-Arch support

2012-02-27 Thread Riku Voipio
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #657139
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657139

** Also affects: elfutils (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657139
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934433

Title:
  elfutils needs Multi-Arch support

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/934433/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 934433] Re: elfutils needs Multi-Arch support

2012-02-27 Thread Riku Voipio
Adding debdiff of patch from Debian BTS applied to ubuntu package. Only
changing the "elfutils" binary package from M-A: same to M-A: foreign.
This minimal package can be chosen to be applied instead of
synchronizing the new upstream version from Debian.

** Patch added: "Multiarch conversion patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/elfutils/+bug/934433/+attachment/2788129/+files/elfutils_ma.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934433

Title:
  elfutils needs Multi-Arch support

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/934433/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 799965] Re: cross-compiler doesn't have /usr/include on the search path

2013-05-31 Thread Riku Voipio
With the focus on binary toolchains instead of ubuntu toolchains, this
no longer affects linaro-ubuntu project.

** Changed in: linaro-ubuntu
   Status: New => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799965

Title:
  cross-compiler doesn't have /usr/include on the search path

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-ubuntu/+bug/799965/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 875928] Re: mutrace: uninstallable as it strictly depends on a specific binutils version

2011-11-01 Thread Riku Voipio
Debdiff between the broken and fixed version. pretty much minimal patch.

** Description changed:

+ [Impact] allways. prevents installation of mutrace in oneiric.
+ 
+ [Development Fix] mutrace was changed to statically link against bfd.
+ 
+ [Stable Fix] patch attached to the bugreport.
+ 
+ [Test Case] sudo apt-get install mutrace
+ 
  $ apt-get install mutrace
  Reading package lists... Done
- Building dependency tree   
+ Building dependency tree
  Reading state information... Done
  Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
  requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
  distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
  or been moved out of Incoming.
  The following information may help to resolve the situation:
  
  The following packages have unmet dependencies:
   mutrace : Depends: binutils (< 2.21.51.20110422) but 
2.21.53.20110810-0ubuntu3 is to be installed
  E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
  
- This is probably because mutrace has binutils-dev at it's build-depends
- package list.
+ 
+ [Regression Potential] Since mutrace cannot be installed, there is hardly 
anything that could regress further :)

** Patch added: "mutrace-static.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutrace/+bug/875928/+attachment/2581736/+files/mutrace-static.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875928

Title:
  mutrace: uninstallable as it strictly depends on a specific binutils
  version

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutrace/+bug/875928/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 875928] Re: mutrace: uninstallable as it strictly depends on a specific binutils version

2011-11-28 Thread Riku Voipio
Hi Fabrice,

Notice that a "simple rebuild" will keep mutrace working only until the
next time a new version of binutils will be uploaded. I would thus
recommend taking the patch so one does not need to come back to mutrace
in this cycle.

Cheers,
Riku

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875928

Title:
  mutrace: uninstallable as it strictly depends on a specific binutils
  version

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutrace/+bug/875928/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 897449] Re: Needs to be merged with Debian's freedesktop-sound-theme package

2011-11-30 Thread Riku Voipio
When merging, make sure you don't lose the Multi-Arch: foreign field

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/897449

Title:
  Needs to be merged with Debian's freedesktop-sound-theme package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sound-theme-freedesktop/+bug/897449/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 890233] [NEW] Firefox FTBFS on 3.x kernels

2011-11-14 Thread Riku Voipio
Public bug reported:

Firefox and friends with embedded copies fail to build on machines with
3.x kernels:

../coreconf/config.mk:71: ../coreconf/Linux3.0.mk: No such file or directory
make[6]: warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode.
make -j1: *** No rule to make target ../coreconf/Linux3.0.mk.  Stop.
make[6]: *** [../coreconf/Linux3.0.mk] Error 1

As ubuntu build machines get eventually new kernels, you might want to
fix this before hitting it while building a security update...

Also reported upstream, fixed in FF 8.0:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=661609

** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: ftbfs

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890233

Title:
  Firefox FTBFS on 3.x kernels

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/890233/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 791246] Re: gnuift version 0.1.14-10 failed to build on armel

2011-06-29 Thread Riku Voipio
This build succeeded on rebuild

** Changed in: gnuift (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791246

Title:
  gnuift version 0.1.14-10 failed to build on armel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnuift/+bug/791246/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 707047] Re: Only half of RAM useable when using Device Tree on Panda board

2011-06-29 Thread Riku Voipio
Still an issue with 11.06 release candidate, testing with pandaboard A1
and developer image.

Linux version 2.6.38-1003-linaro-omap (buildd@adoxaceae) (gcc version
4.5.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4) ) #4~ppa5-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed
May 25 14:44:32 UTC 2011 (Ubuntu 2.6.38-1003.4~ppa5-linaro-omap
2.6.38.7)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707047

Title:
  Only half of RAM useable when using Device Tree on Panda board

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-image-tools/+bug/707047/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 736084] Re: perl-gdb testcase fails, results in FTBFS

2011-06-29 Thread Riku Voipio
According to the debian bug this is actually a bug in gdb.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736084

Title:
  perl-gdb testcase fails, results in FTBFS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdevel-bt-perl/+bug/736084/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 791244] Re: raincat version 1.1-2 failed to build on armel

2011-06-08 Thread Riku Voipio
With haskell-ghc-mtl freshly built, this should now build fine.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791244

Title:
  raincat version 1.1-2 failed to build on armel

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 599695] Re: pbuilder always passes Ubuntu keyring, even when creating e.g. Debian environments

2010-09-27 Thread Riku Voipio
Someone should update the https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto to
explain how to fit the keyring parameter there.

IMNHSO this should be fixed in debootstrap, since it already has per-
distro scripts.

-- 
pbuilder always passes Ubuntu keyring, even when creating e.g. Debian 
environments
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599695
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 802901] Re: "E: Internal Error, Could not early remove linux-libc-dev" in multiarch chroot

2011-08-02 Thread Riku Voipio
I can get this now with a fresh oneiric chroot with multiarch enabled
and no armel packages installed by just:

-snip-
apt-get install linux-libc-dev:armel
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  linux-libc-dev:armel
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/802 kB of archives.
After this operation, 4530 kB of additional disk space will be used.
E: Internal Error, Could not early remove linux-libc-dev
-snip-

manual dpkg -i linux-libc-dev:armel*deb will work fine

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802901

Title:
  "E: Internal Error, Could not early remove linux-libc-dev" in
  multiarch chroot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/802901/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 705438] Re: mkfs.ubifs gives corrupt images

2011-08-02 Thread Riku Voipio
Ubuntu has automatically synced to the updated debian version, which
fixes the bug,

** Changed in: mtd-utils (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: mtd-utils (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Riku Voipio (riku-voipio)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705438

Title:
  mkfs.ubifs gives corrupt images

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mtd-utils/+bug/705438/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 372121] Re: xargs on qemu has bad ARG_MAX

2011-05-04 Thread Riku Voipio
This was fixed in qemu in commit:

fd4d81dd04b4e606ce40a41d66368ba77c77c753

long since included in qemu.

** Changed in: findutils (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

** Changed in: findutils (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Riku Voipio (riku-voipio)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372121

Title:
  xargs on qemu has bad ARG_MAX

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 788615] [NEW] Sync mutrace 0.2.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-05-26 Thread Riku Voipio
Public bug reported:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

 affects ubuntu
 status new
 importance wishlist
 subscribe ubuntu-sponsors
 done

Please sync mutrace 0.2.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

All changelog entries:

mutrace (0.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Initial upload to debian
  * include changes from upstream git since 0.2

 -- Riku Voipio   Mon, 23 May 2011 11:50:52 +0300
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFN3llnibPvMsrqrwMRAlZ3AJ9ppK22va9BfysdMh4vdFCXk5VhlACg3DfP
ZCYCYmTBq4zIm28QEWu6ROU=
=kQPY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Wishlist
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788615

Title:
  Sync mutrace 0.2.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 788614] [NEW] Sync latrace 0.5.10.20110523-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-05-26 Thread Riku Voipio
Public bug reported:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

 affects ubuntu
 status new
 importance wishlist
 subscribe ubuntu-sponsors
 done

Please sync latrace 0.5.10.20110523-1 (universe) from Debian unstable
(main)

All changelog entries:

latrace (0.5.10.20110523-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Repackage and modernize
  * Initial upload to debian Closes: #605378
  * take git snapshot to get latest ARM fix in.

 -- Riku Voipio   Mon, 23 May 2011 11:50:52
+0300

latrace (0.5.7-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Packaged again.

 -- Akos PASZTORY   Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:57:07 +0200
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFN3llRibPvMsrqrwMRAlyLAKCcRmXqFgyLvRNoZqO8rJwGJHFtRACgpYsj
07pdM/SP8g6aZbY8k2trtoM=
=dnk6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Wishlist
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788614

Title:
  Sync latrace 0.5.10.20110523-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 791288] Re: stlport5.2 version 5.2.1-5.1 failed to build on armel

2011-06-01 Thread Riku Voipio
This is probably best solved by removing stlport5.2 and nel, the only
reverse dependency of stlport5.2.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791288

Title:
  stlport5.2 version 5.2.1-5.1 failed to build on armel

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 791237] Re: syslog-ng version 3.2.4-1 failed to build on armel

2011-06-01 Thread Riku Voipio
This is a bug in the package. The build-dependency of libevtlog-dev
should be versioned.

-Build-Depends: quilt, debhelper (>= 5), libnet1-dev, libevtlog-dev, libssl-dev,
+Build-Depends: quilt, debhelper (>= 5), libnet1-dev, libevtlog-dev (>=0.2.12), 
libssl-dev,

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791237

Title:
  syslog-ng version 3.2.4-1 failed to build on armel

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 791265] Re: eventlog version 0.2.12-1 failed to build on armel

2011-06-01 Thread Riku Voipio
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #622007
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622007

** Also affects: eventlog (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622007
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791265

Title:
  eventlog version 0.2.12-1 failed to build on armel

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 771805] Re: [armel] ltrace hangs

2011-04-29 Thread Riku Voipio
We shall look at the tracing session at UDS if we should prefer ltrace
or latrace. I think we should rather have one well working tool rather
than two tools with different set of issues...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/771805

Title:
  [armel] ltrace hangs

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


  1   2   >