[Bug 343806] [NEW] gnome-settings-daemon crashes without clear error message

2009-03-16 Thread Riku Eskelinen
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-settings-daemon

Since today, gnome-settings-daemon hasn't been able to start and
therefore themes etc don't work either. After running "gnome-settings-
daemon --no-daemon --debug" on terminal, the correct theme loads and is
displayed until line "** (gnome-settings-daemon:17444): DEBUG: Starting
font manager" is shown. There is no progress for a second or two after
that, but then g-s-d proceeds.

Also, interesting part is the last line before g-s-d exits:
"** (gnome-settings-daemon:17329): DEBUG: Crea".

I'm using gnome-settings-daemon version 2.24.0-0ubuntu3.3. Also, if more
details are needed, i'll be more than willing to help to fix this bug.

** Affects: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
gnome-settings-daemon crashes without clear error message
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343806
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 343806] Re: gnome-settings-daemon crashes without clear error message

2009-03-16 Thread Riku Eskelinen

** Attachment added: "gnome-settings-manager.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23948161/gnome-settings-manager.log

-- 
gnome-settings-daemon crashes without clear error message
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343806
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 343806] Re: gnome-settings-daemon crashes without clear error message

2009-03-17 Thread Riku Eskelinen
I was able to work around this bug by removing all hidden files in ~/.
Don't know which of them caused the bug, but those files were:.dmrc,
.esd_auth, .gksu_lock, .gtk-bookmarks, .ICEauthority, .mcoprc,
.mousetweaks.pid, .mtoolsrc, .pulse-cookie, .recently-used, .recently-
used.xbel, .Xauthority, .xscreensaver, .xscreensaver-getimage.cache and
.xsession-errors. I have backup of those, if anyone needs any of them.

-- 
gnome-settings-daemon crashes without clear error message
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343806
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 228086] [NEW] Finnish translation of "df" output misaligned

2008-05-07 Thread Riku Eskelinen
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: coreutils

Being very similar to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/181731 , df
prints disk usage statistics misaligned (see attachment for example),
when locale is fi_FI.UTF-8.

This bug exists at least in coreutils 6.10-3ubuntu2.

** Affects: coreutils (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Finnish translation of "df" output misaligned
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228086
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 228086] Re: Finnish translation of "df" output misaligned

2008-05-07 Thread Riku Eskelinen

** Attachment added: "df output in fi_FI.UTF-8"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14357380/finnish_df_output.txt

-- 
Finnish translation of "df" output misaligned
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228086
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 112488] Beryl and KDE styles conflicting with the menu drop-shadow feature

2007-05-04 Thread Riku Eskelinen
Public bug reported:

If using Beryl with some of the KDE themes (the ones supporting menu drop-down 
shadow), it sometimes doesn't clear the ugly results of two shadows at the same 
time, and beryl has to be restarted. Changing KDE's shadows on/off doesn't take 
effect at all.
Using Beryl 0.2.0 rc3, KDE 3.5.6 and Kubuntu 7.04, with nVidia GeForce4 440 Go 
and with last non-legacy binary drivers for the card.

** Affects: beryl-core (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
Beryl and KDE styles conflicting with the menu drop-shadow feature
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112488
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 881172] Re: Graphical errors on charts in resources tab (faded bands)

2011-11-30 Thread Riku Eskelinen
I am also affected by this bug, using gnome-system-monitor
3.2.1-0ubuntu1, with ATi Radeon HD 3450, fglrx and my CRT monitor
connected via DVI-VGA adapter to DVI output.

I don't know if gnome-system-monitor is the one to blame (could this be
due to some kind of color profile or subpixel hinting feature?), but
someone with more knowledge about this should really look into this.

** Attachment added: "Screenshot of Resources tab"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-monitor/+bug/881172/+attachment/2613632/+files/gnome-system-monitor.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881172

Title:
  Graphical errors on charts in resources tab (faded bands)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-monitor/+bug/881172/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 626974] Re: ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 drivers in Maverick

2010-10-23 Thread Riku Eskelinen
@angandrob: As far as I know this bug cannot be fixed until NVidia
releases xorg 1.9 compatible binary driver. And NVidia has told via its
forum that they will release nvidia-96 driver for xorg 1.9, but it is
low priority issue for them. So all we can do now is sit back, relax and
enjoy our nv/vesa/nouveau drivers.

-- 
ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 drivers in Maverick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626974
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 743668] [NEW] gksu does not ask for specific password with libpam-otpw

2011-03-27 Thread Riku Eskelinen
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gksu

I'm using Natty and gksu does not prompt for specific password when
libpam-otpw is being used.

What happens:
1. I launch f. ex. synaptic with "gksu synaptic"
2. Gksu asks for "Password".
3. I have no information of which password (out of the list of 280 passwords 
generated by otpw-gen) gksu wants. Fallback to normal unix password does not 
seem to work either.
4. Can't open application.

What should happen:
1. I launch f. ex. synaptic with "gksu synaptic"
2. Gksu asks for "Password 123".
3. I type the password in.
4. If it is correct, application should be launched. If it is incorrect, gksu 
should fall back to unix password.

Sudo and GDM, for example, seem to handle this correctly.

libpam-otpw:
  Installed: 1.3-2
  Candidate: 1.3-2
  Version table:
 *** 1.3-2 0
500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/universe amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

sudo:
  Installed: 1.7.4p4-5ubuntu5
  Candidate: 1.7.4p4-5ubuntu5
  Version table:
 *** 1.7.4p4-5ubuntu5 0
500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

gksu:
  Installed: 2.0.2-5ubuntu2
  Candidate: 2.0.2-5ubuntu2
  Version table:
 *** 2.0.2-5ubuntu2 0
500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: gksu 2.0.2-5ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
CheckboxSubmission: cbd477ae80fb850ed262ecd426db3d11
CheckboxSystem: daed2f3d6643b4a84b4520a2427f8c2b
Date: Sun Mar 27 17:43:28 2011
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Alpha amd64 (20110302)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=fi:en
 LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gksu
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-26 (1 days ago)

** Affects: gksu (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743668

Title:
  gksu does not ask for specific password with libpam-otpw

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 743668] Re: gksu does not ask for specific password with libpam-otpw

2011-03-27 Thread Riku Eskelinen
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743668

Title:
  gksu does not ask for specific password with libpam-otpw

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 753587] [NEW] Bottom panel gets misplaced on every login

2011-04-07 Thread Riku Eskelinen
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-panel

I'm using natty and Gnome. I have three panels: two top panels and one
bottom panel. The bottom panel is not set to expand. When gnome-panel
starts up, the bottom panel appears in the middle of my desktop (see
attached screenshot gnome-panel_before_toggling.png).

I am able to get the panel back to its correct position by toggling
Expand on and off.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: gnome-panel 1:2.32.1-0ubuntu6.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
CheckboxSubmission: cbd477ae80fb850ed262ecd426db3d11
CheckboxSystem: daed2f3d6643b4a84b4520a2427f8c2b
Date: Thu Apr  7 17:01:08 2011
GConfNonDefault:
 
/apps/panel/general/applet_id_list=[mixer_screen0,clock_screen0,show_desktop_button_screen0,window_list_screen0,trashapplet_screen0,applet_0,applet_7,applet_6,applet_8,applet_1,applet_9,applet_10,applet_11,applet_12,applet_13]
 
/apps/panel/general/object_id_list=[menu_bar_screen0,object_0,object_2,object_3,object_5,object_6,object_8,object_1]
 
/apps/panel/general/toplevel_id_list=[bottom_panel_screen0,top_panel_screen0,panel_3]
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Alpha amd64 (20110302)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=fi:en
 LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gnome-panel
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-26 (12 days ago)

** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753587

Title:
  Bottom panel gets misplaced on every login

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 753587] Re: Bottom panel gets misplaced on every login

2011-04-07 Thread Riku Eskelinen
** Attachment added: "Gnome-panel before toggling Expand on and off."
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753587/+attachment/1994373/+files/gnome-panel_before_toggling.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753587

Title:
  Bottom panel gets misplaced on every login

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 753587] Re: Bottom panel gets misplaced on every login

2011-04-07 Thread Riku Eskelinen
** Attachment added: "Gnome-panel after toggling Expand on and off."
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-panel/+bug/753587/+attachment/1994376/+files/gnome-panel_after_toggling.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753587

Title:
  Bottom panel gets misplaced on every login

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 626974] Re: ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 drivers in Maverick

2010-11-08 Thread Riku Eskelinen
I think the new driver should be packaged and the package released asap,
and this bug report should be updated. Now it seems that we're all
waiting that somebody does something, but nobody does anything. That
makes, IMO, Ubuntu in whole look bad.

-- 
ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 drivers in Maverick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626974
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 626974] Re: ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 drivers in Maverick

2010-11-09 Thread Riku Eskelinen
Darik: Your packaging works for me, got nvidia running *thumbs up*. The
only issue I ran into was X's driver autodetection, which seems to
select VESA even if there are all nv, nouveau and nvidia to choose from.
Setting driver to "nvidia" in xorg.conf seems to solve that, and I think
it is bug somewhere in X and not in nvidia driver.

-- 
ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 drivers in Maverick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626974
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] Re: dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData

2010-10-14 Thread Riku Eskelinen
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 626974 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626974

I wonder why this bug got marked as duplicate of #626974. IMO this leads
to confusion as these two bugs, although related to same issue, have
different point of views. This bug being about the actual issue NVidia
legacy binary driver "nvidia-96" is having, and #626974 being about the
whole incompatibility issue between X.org 1.9 and NVidia legacy binary
drivers (including both nvidia-96 and nvidia-173). If I got it all
wrong, just let me know and I stop whining about this.

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 626974] Re: ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 drivers in Maverick

2010-10-14 Thread Riku Eskelinen
And why, oh why, my bug got marked as duplicate :( (see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-
drivers-96/+bug/616394/comments/33 )

-- 
ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 drivers in 
Maverick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626974
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 633181] Re: brasero crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_new_va() when trying to create ISO from files

2010-09-08 Thread Riku Eskelinen
** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
brasero crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_new_va() when trying to create ISO 
from files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/633181
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 633181] Re: brasero crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_new_va() when trying to create ISO from files

2010-09-08 Thread Riku Eskelinen
** Attachment removed: "CoreDump.gz"
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/633181/+attachment/1556940/+files/CoreDump.gz

-- 
brasero crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_new_va() when trying to create ISO 
from files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/633181
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 633181] Re: brasero crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_new_va() when trying to create ISO from files

2010-09-10 Thread Riku Eskelinen
It seems that 2.31.91-0ubuntu2 fixes this issue. For me, at least.

-- 
brasero crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_new_va() when trying to create ISO 
from files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/633181
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] Re: dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData

2010-08-29 Thread Riku Eskelinen
This might be related:
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=153963 .

So it seems that making their legacy drivers work with X server 1.9 is
low priority issue for NVidia. Too bad that some (including me) just
can't upgrade to nvidia-current.

I don't know the details to be sure, but for now it seems there is
nothing we (as Ubuntu community) can do but wait. It would be great if
nouveau worked with my gfx card, though :)

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] Re: dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData

2010-08-11 Thread Riku Eskelinen

** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53488223/xorg-log

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] [NEW] dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData

2010-08-11 Thread Riku Eskelinen
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: nvidia-96

After upgrading from lucid to maverick, NVidia binary driver nvidia-96 stopped 
working. After examining /var/log/Xorg.0.log, I found the following (complete 
Xorg.0.log attached):
>...
>[   562.979] (II) LoadModule: "nvidia"
>[   562.980] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so
>[   563.018] dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined 
>symbol: miEmptyData
>[   563.018] (EE) Failed to load /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so
>[   563.018] (II) UnloadModule: "nvidia"
>[   563.018] (EE) Failed to load module "nvidia" (loader failed, 7)
>[   563.018] (EE) No drivers available.
>...

lspci | grep VGA:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV11 [GeForce2 MX/MX 400] 
(rev a1)

apt-cache policy nvidia-96:
nvidia-96:
  Installed: 96.43.18-0ubuntu1
  Candidate: 96.43.18-0ubuntu1
  Version table:
 *** 96.43.18-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/restricted i386 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-96 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs