Re: [Bug 34699] Re: Huge mem leak
I since upgraded to Dapper but as long as I used Breezy I had the problem. Apparently fixes from Dapper were not backported so the bug is probably still there. -- Je me console d'être femme en songeant que, de la sorte, je n'en épouserai jamais une. Lady Montagu -- Huge mem leak https://launchpad.net/bugs/34699 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1574101] Re: Edge non transparent window
Could you give some details on your system (ubuntu release and flavor, window manager etc) ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574101 Title: Edge non transparent window To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/agenda.app/+bug/1574101/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1574101] Re: Edge non transparent window
Le 23/04/2016 23:27, Xavier Laffargue a écrit : > Sure : > Ubuntu 16.04, Unity, 64bits > Intel i3 > Chipset : Intel Ironlake Mobile > Thanks. Do you have the same problem with others GNUstep applications ? I don't see how this could be related to agenda.app but I could be missing something. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574101 Title: Edge non transparent window To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/agenda.app/+bug/1574101/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1574101] Re: Edge non transparent window
Your last screenshot seems to be from a gnome/gtk application, right ? So the problem probably comes for Unity, gtk, the theme you're using or something near the graphic stack. You should probably redirect this bug to another package but I don't know which one. What graphic theme do you use ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574101 Title: Edge non transparent window To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/agenda.app/+bug/1574101/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1574101] Re: Edge non transparent window
The reporter chose the wrong package, see the second screenshot. ** Package changed: agenda.app (Ubuntu) => gnome-calendar (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574101 Title: Edge non transparent window To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-calendar/+bug/1574101/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 765936] Re: agenda.app version 0.41-2build1 failed to build on i386
Well, I would like to help but I don't know how... Can I see the config.h file generated by configure ? Also, why are there 2 libobjc referenced in the build logs ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765936 Title: agenda.app version 0.41-2build1 failed to build on i386 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 765936] Re: agenda.app version 0.41-2build1 failed to build on i386
I think I gave the solution to this problem, even if the patch I provided is not fully correct. Is there something I can do to help close the bug fot good ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765936 Title: agenda.app version 0.41-2build1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/agenda.app/+bug/765936/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 765936] Re: agenda.app version 0.41-2build1 failed to build on i386
This second patch fixes the build problem in a nicer way. But the main problem of mixing libobjc2 with libobjc3 and libgnustep- base.1.20 with libgnustep-base.1.22 remains. ** Patch added: "ld-flags-2.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/agenda.app/+bug/765936/+attachment/2170957/+files/ld-flags-2.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765936 Title: agenda.app version 0.41-2build1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/agenda.app/+bug/765936/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 707720] [NEW] SimpleAgenda won't start after a clean install because of missing fonts
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: agenda.app When installing SimpleAgenda/agenda.app in Maverick, gnustep- back0.16-art is installed as the GNUstep backend. The art backend uses nfont packages but gnustep-back0.16-art .deb doesn't contain any font. This results in the following messages when starting SimpleAgenda or affiche.app : ... NSFont, Helvetica, can't be found. 2011-01-25 14:58:23.891 SimpleAgenda[2036] Font not found Helvetica 2011-01-25 14:58:23.891 SimpleAgenda[2036] Font not found Helvetica 2011-01-25 14:58:23.891 SimpleAgenda[2036] Font not found Helvetica 2011-01-25 14:58:23.891 SimpleAgenda[2036] Font not found Courier 2011-01-25 14:58:23.891 SimpleAgenda[2036] Font not found Fixed 2011-01-25 14:58:23.891 SimpleAgenda[2036] NSFont.m:1434 Assertion failed in GSCInlineString(instance), method initWithCoder:. Couldn't find a valid font when decoding. 2011-01-25 14:58:23.892 SimpleAgenda[2036] Exception occured while loading model: NSFont.m:1434 Assertion failed in GSCInlineString(instance), method initWithCoder:. Couldn't find a valid font when decoding. 2011-01-25 14:58:23.892 SimpleAgenda[2036] Failed to load Gorm 2011-01-25 14:58:23.892 SimpleAgenda[2036] Could not load Gorm file: /usr/lib/GNUstep/Applications/SimpleAgenda.app/Resources/Agenda.gorm 2011-01-25 14:58:23.893 SimpleAgenda[2036] Cannot load the main model file 'Agenda.gorm' Installing the Helvetica.nfont folder found in an old gnustep-back rpm in ~/GNUstep/Library/Fonts/ and setting the GNUstep default font with 'defaults write NSGlobalDomain NSFont Helvetica' fixes the problem. ** Affects: agenda.app (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707720 Title: SimpleAgenda won't start after a clean install because of missing fonts -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 707720] Re: SimpleAgenda won't start after a clean install because of missing fonts
I shoud probably have linked this bug with gnustep-back, is it still possible ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707720 Title: SimpleAgenda won't start after a clean install because of missing fonts -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 707720] Re: SimpleAgenda won't start after a clean install because of missing fonts
Here's an (edited) explanation : Old gnustep-back in Debian/Ubuntu uses a defoma script to generate .nfont bundles during installation; they are not shipped in the package as there is no way to predict which fonts will be available on the user's machine (no font package ships .nfont bundles, and that's how it should be). The script turned out to work less and less reliably, because in the past few years Debian has been trying to get rid of defoma, and as a consequence font packages have been dropping their "defoma hints" progressively. So what the script generated was a bunch of incorrect/incomplete .nfont bundles. [...] > Do you know if this problem exists in Debian ? No, it surely existed during the squeeze development cycle but we got that fixed by generating the bundles with fc-cache + mknfonts. ** Package changed: agenda.app (Ubuntu) => gnustep-back (Ubuntu) ** Summary changed: - SimpleAgenda won't start after a clean install because of missing fonts + GNUstep apps won't start after a clean install because of missing fonts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707720 Title: GNUstep apps won't start after a clean install because of missing fonts -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 765936] Re: agenda.app version 0.41-2build1 failed to build on i386
Ok but apparently gnustep-gui uses libobjc.so.2 : /usr/bin/ld: warning: libobjc.so.2, needed by /usr/lib/libgnustep- gui.so, may conflict with libobjc.so.3 Anyway, Natty seems to ship gcc 4.5 so can you please tell me for which environment this package is build and how can I reproduce it ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765936 Title: agenda.app version 0.41-2build1 failed to build on i386 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 765936] Re: agenda.app version 0.41-2build1 failed to build on i386
Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 à 09:33 +, Matthias Klose a écrit : > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2011-April/033040.html Ok, you're not really helping here. I asked how I could reproduce this problem (and also to see the config.h file) and your only answer is a link to a message with no information ?? I took the time to download and install the latest natty cd in a vm to try to reproduce this and guess what, apt-cache search gcc | grep 4.6 gives me nada. Am I supposed to guess what is the environment in which the build fails ? If you want me to look into this problem you could probably take the time to answer my questions. FYI 3 months ago I filed a bug report about a font problem making every GNUstep applications I tested crash on a fresh maverick install (I discovered that because a user contacted me directly) with the art backend and nobody responded. At the time I also tested the cairo backend but this one crashed for another reason with a backtrace in pixman. And now I have to fight to get informations about a problem in a non existing ubuntu release ? Philippe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765936 Title: agenda.app version 0.41-2build1 failed to build on i386 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 765936] Re: agenda.app version 0.41-2build1 failed to build on i386
Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 à 21:33 +, Matthias Klose a écrit : > rant as you want. Thanks, I certainly will. > please see the followup on the cited email for the instructions you are > asking for. Great. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765936 Title: agenda.app version 0.41-2build1 failed to build on i386 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 765936] Re: agenda.app version 0.41-2build1 failed to build on i386
Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 à 21:33 +, Matthias Klose a écrit : > rant as you want. > > please see the followup on the cited email for the instructions you are > asking for. Try the appended patch. This just moves the '-lical -luuid' part of the link command near the end of the line. I don't know if the problem comes from gcc or ld and I guess (or hope) that the last release of gnustep-make workaround this problem. Of course the resulting application crashes on startup, probably because it's linked with libobjc.3.so when gnustep-base and gui use libobjc.2.so, but hey, I guess it's not important. Philippe ** Patch added: "ld-flags-position.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765936/+attachment/2078451/+files/ld-flags-position.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765936 Title: agenda.app version 0.41-2build1 failed to build on i386 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 765936] Re: agenda.app version 0.41-2build1 failed to build on i386
Update : with the latest gnustep-make release, the '-lical -luuid' linker flags are located at the end of the command without modifications to GNUmakefile.preamble. This is not a bug in SimpleAgenda (or agenda.app if you prefer). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765936 Title: agenda.app version 0.41-2build1 failed to build on i386 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 765936] Re: agenda.app version 0.41-2build1 failed to build on i386
** Description changed: -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765936 Title: agenda.app version 0.41-2build1 failed to build on i386 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
