Re: [Bug 364098] Re: Stack dump in tcp_input.c tcp_mark_head_lost
Andres, I can not reproduce at will but it has happened a few times and was not an isolated incident. The particular machine it happens on is a busy seedbox with several hundred to a few thousand connections over a 25Mbps pipeline. I've been having ISP problems for the past month, and I haven't seen the issue since May 25th. I would guess it's utilization-related based on that observation alone, but there's no hard evidence to support that claim. Please let me know what I can do to help track this down. Any particular steps you would like me to follow to gather information for you guys to work on? Thanks, Peter On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Andres Mujica wrote: > Peter, upstream has been trying to reproduce this issue. Are you able to > do it or it was a one time thing? > > look here for a brief explanation: > http://markmail.org/message/jjr6oinf5z7afbaz > > If you can reproduce it, then it would be necessary to test with > upstream and latest Jaunty kernels and provide the apport-collect > output. Let us now in order to proceed. > > Also we would need to open an upstream report for this, so let us now if > it's reproducible and that you can test the kernels. > > Regards > > ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) > Status: Triaged => Incomplete > > -- > Stack dump in tcp_input.c tcp_mark_head_lost > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364098 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- Stack dump in tcp_input.c tcp_mark_head_lost https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364098 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364098] [NEW] Stack dump in tcp_input.c tcp_mark_head_lost
Public bug reported: Hardware: Asus M3A78, Athlon 4050e, 2GB, Silicon Image PCIe SATA2 controller, 8 SATA2 disks, 1 IDE disk Software: Ubuntu Server 8.10 64-bit used as seedbox Active software on box: rtorrent (recent from svn), actively seeding with several hundred connections Operations did not seem to be affected, I found this one accidentally while routinely looking through logs. Stack trace from /var/log/messages: Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.989898] [ cut here ] Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.989907] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2232 tcp_mark_head_lost+0x214/0x230() Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.989912] Modules linked in: kvm_amd kvm nfsd auth_rpcgss exportfs nfs lockd nfs_acl sunrpc lp snd_hda_intel s3fb svgalib vgastate ppdev snd_pcm snd_timer i2c_piix4 k8temp snd soundcore pcspkr snd_page_a lloc parport_pc parport xfs floppy r8169 mii raid10 raid456 async_xor async_memcpy async_tx xor raid1 raid0 multipath linear fbcon tileblit font bitblit softcursor Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.989969] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.28-11-server #40-Ubuntu Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.989974] Call Trace: Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.989978][] warn_on_slowpath+0x5f/0x90 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.989995] [] ? _spin_lock_irqsave+0x32/0x50 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990002] [] ? tcp_transmit_skb+0x4f3/0x760 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990010] [] tcp_mark_head_lost+0x214/0x230 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990016] [] tcp_update_scoreboard+0x142/0x1f0 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990022] [] tcp_fastretrans_alert+0x858/0xcc0 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990027] [] tcp_ack+0x465/0x640 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990032] [] tcp_rcv_established+0x367/0x760 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990039] [] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xfb/0x150 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990045] [] tcp_v4_rcv+0x5ae/0x7d0 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990051] [] ? ip_output+0x65/0xb0 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990058] [] ip_local_deliver_finish+0xdb/0x1e0 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990063] [] ip_local_deliver+0x8d/0xa0 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990069] [] ip_rcv_finish+0x1a3/0x3d0 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990077] [] ? __kfree_skb+0x3a/0xa0 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990082] [] ip_rcv+0x264/0x2f0 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990090] [] netif_receive_skb+0x2dc/0x590 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990106] [] rtl8169_rx_interrupt+0x1b4/0x520 [r8169] Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990117] [] rtl8169_poll+0x32/0xe8 [r8169] Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990127] [] ? getnstimeofday+0x59/0xe0 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990132] [] net_rx_action+0x104/0x240 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990139] [] __do_softirq+0x9c/0x170 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990146] [] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990152] [] do_softirq+0x5d/0xa0 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990158] [] irq_exit+0x8d/0xa0 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990163] [] do_IRQ+0xc5/0x110 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990168] [] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x29 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990171][] ? native_safe_halt+0x6/0x10 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990186] [] ? clockevents_notify+0x3d/0x90 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990195] [] ? default_idle+0x4d/0x50 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990200] [] ? c1e_idle+0x8a/0x130 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990207] [] ? atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x15/0x20 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990216] [] ? cpu_idle+0x65/0xc0 Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990223] [] ? start_secondary+0x9e/0xcb Apr 11 03:48:02 nas kernel: [184920.990228] ---[ end trace 3a373a93fea80ce5 ]--- ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Stack dump in tcp_input.c tcp_mark_head_lost https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364098 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364098] Re: Stack dump in tcp_input.c tcp_mark_head_lost
Another dump in the network stack: Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011291] [ cut here ] Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011300] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/net/sched/sch_generic.c:226 dev_watchdog+0x270/0x280() Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011305] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit timed out Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011309] Modules linked in: kvm_amd kvm nfsd auth_rpcgss exportfs nfs lockd nfs_acl sunrpc it87 hwmon_vid lp snd_hda_intel s3fb snd_pcm snd_timer svgalib snd soundcore vgastate ppdev psmouse k8temp snd_page_alloc i2c_piix4 pcspkr parport_pc parport serio_raw xfs 8139too 8139cp r8169 mii floppy raid10 raid456 async_xorasync_memcpy async_tx xor raid1 raid0 multipath linear fbcon tileblit font bitblit softcursor Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011372] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: G W 2.6.28-11-server #42-Ubuntu Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011377] Call Trace: Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011381][] warn_slowpath+0xb7/0xf0 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011399] [] ? ktime_get_ts+0x59/0x60 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011406] [] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xcc/0x160 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011413] [] ? getnstimeofday+0x59/0xe0 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011422] [] ? lapic_next_event+0x15/0x20 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011429] [] ? clockevents_program_event+0x4f/0x90 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011435] [] ? tick_program_event+0x25/0x30 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011441] [] ? hrtimer_interrupt+0x166/0x1c0 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011449] [] ? strlcpy+0x4a/0x60 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011454] [] dev_watchdog+0x270/0x280 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011461] [] ? apic_timer_interrupt+0x88/0x90 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011466] [] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x280 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011474] [] run_timer_softirq+0x179/0x260 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011483] [] ? ata_sff_interrupt+0x145/0x2d0 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011489] [] __do_softirq+0x9c/0x170 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011496] [] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011502] [] do_softirq+0x5d/0xa0 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011507] [] irq_exit+0x8d/0xa0 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011512] [] do_IRQ+0xc5/0x110 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011518] [] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x29 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011521][] ? native_safe_halt+0x6/0x10 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011534] [] ? clockevents_notify+0x3d/0x90 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011542] [] ? default_idle+0x4d/0x50 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011548] [] ? c1e_idle+0x8a/0x130 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011555] [] ? atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x15/0x20 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011564] [] ? cpu_idle+0x65/0xc0 Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011570] [] ? start_secondary+0x9e/0xcb Apr 24 08:39:33 nas kernel: [22478.011575] ---[ end trace 421a2257cb001c49 ]--- -- Stack dump in tcp_input.c tcp_mark_head_lost https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364098 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 364098] Re: Stack dump in tcp_input.c tcp_mark_head_lost
Tell you what. Go ahead and mark it as invalid. I'm planning on upgrading it but even if it does reproduce, it may take forever. If I ever see it again, I'll report it against a newer kernel version or reopen this bug report, as applicable. Cheers, Peter On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Andres Mujica wrote: > Well, as this is an upstream bug, in order to open the report we would > need to be able to reproduce it with the latest vanilla kernel from > Mainline. > > As i understand, this is a production box, so i'm afraid those tests > wouldn't be easy to do... > > I would mark this as invalid, but if you can test and reproduce with > latest Mainline (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds ) please > reopen it, so we can send it upstream. > > Thanks again for your help! > > ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) > Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix > > -- > Stack dump in tcp_input.c tcp_mark_head_lost > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364098 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- Stack dump in tcp_input.c tcp_mark_head_lost https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364098 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 51861] Unable to delete/modify events organized by others
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: korganizer I can not delete or modify an event that someone has sent me from Outlook and I have accepted. This happens with iCalendar/vCalendar in both a single file and a directory. The only way I can modify/delete these events is by stopping Kontact and manually editing/deleting the file itself. ** Affects: kdepim (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Unable to delete/modify events organized by others https://launchpad.net/bugs/51861 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 51862] KMail composer: address drop-down omits middle names
Public bug reported: When composing a new email, in the address drop-down that appears in any of the recipient headers, KMail omits middle names in the display name/alias even though they are present in the addressbook. This happens with an LDAP addressbook but could be unrelated to the actual type. One could potentially send email to the wrong person, and this could be a very serious issue with even legal implications. ** Affects: kdepim (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- KMail composer: address drop-down omits middle names https://launchpad.net/bugs/51862 -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 51862] Re: [Bug 51862] Re: KMail composer: address drop-down omits middle names
I would agree with you if it were not for remote addressbooks (LDAP, eGroupwise etc.) where I have no control of how they are created. Attached are screenshots of my current configuration and the issue. As you can see, I have it configured correctly, and it shows up correctly in KAddressBook, but not in KMail. Regards, Peter On Friday 25 August 2006 08:01, Rocco Stanzione wrote: > This is a configuration issue, not a bug. When you create the contact, > you can select "Full Name" as the formatted name. You can also > configure the address book to make "Full Name" the default formatted > name. Once configured, the full name shows in the drop down as you > describe. > > ** Changed in: kdepim (Ubuntu) >Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected > "Tumbleweed E-mail Firewall " made the following annotations on 08/25/06, 06:52:42 -- === Tumbleweed Communications Disclaimer === This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. == -- KMail composer: address drop-down omits middle names https://launchpad.net/bugs/51862 -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 30268] Re: Having a single contact in multiple groups always shows it as offline
Wouter, I worked with a Kopete developer and she fixed it upstream. I'm using Gutsy and am not having the problem anymore. Cheers, Peter On Wednesday 27 February 2008 19:17:48 Wouter Stomp wrote: >Is this still an issue on gutsy and/or hardy? > >** Changed in: kdenetwork (Ubuntu) > Status: Confirmed => Incomplete > "Tumbleweed Communications " made the following annotations on 02/27/08, 09:50:11 -- === Tumbleweed Communications Disclaimer === This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. Tumbleweed Communications Corp., an industry leader in managed file transfer and content security, provides enterprise-class solutions to organizations of all sizes. Tumbleweed's innovative products enable organizations to effectively manage and protect business-critical Internet communications, with capabilities that span secure file transfer, encryption, data loss prevention, and email security. == -- Having a single contact in multiple groups always shows it as offline https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30268 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 51862] Re: KMail composer: address drop-down omits middle names
Jérôme, I am running Feisty and this one looks fixed. Thanks, Peter On Thursday 07 June 2007 20:31:33 Jérôme Guelfucci wrote: >Thank you for your bug report. Do you still have this issue with the >latest release of Ubuntu ? > >** Changed in: kdepim (Ubuntu) > Importance: Undecided => Medium > Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info > "Tumbleweed E-mail Firewall " made the following annotations on 06/07/07, 10:53:47 -- === Tumbleweed Communications Disclaimer === This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. Tumbleweed is the industry leading pure play messaging security vendor. We provide the most comprehensive solution for both inbound/outbound email and file transfer needs. The most security conscious corporations rely on our solutions to solve their messaging security needs. == -- KMail composer: address drop-down omits middle names https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/51862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a bug contact for kdepim in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 51861] Re: Unable to delete/modify events organized by others
Jérôme, I don't know. I have since switched to dimap for my email and calendar (read only), and I manage my calendar from within Outlook running on VMWare (or using OWA, as appropriate). Thus if I need to delete anything, I do it from Outlook. If you need me to test this, I can probably set up an Exchange server in the lab and test it with a Feisty box I have lying around. Cheers, Peter On Thursday 07 June 2007 20:32:11 Jérôme Guelfucci wrote: >Thank you for your bug report. Do you still have this issue with the >latest release of Ubuntu ? > >** Changed in: kdepim (Ubuntu) > Importance: Undecided => Low > Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info > "Tumbleweed E-mail Firewall " made the following annotations on 06/07/07, 10:58:34 -- === Tumbleweed Communications Disclaimer === This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. Tumbleweed is the industry leading pure play messaging security vendor. We provide the most comprehensive solution for both inbound/outbound email and file transfer needs. The most security conscious corporations rely on our solutions to solve their messaging security needs. == -- Unable to delete/modify events organized by others https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/51861 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a bug contact for kdepim in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 481788] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:398 inotify_remove_from_idr+0x7e/0x90()
I reported one of the duplicates that you've merged. I still see this warning running 2.6.31-19-server (x86_64). I have a feeling this is related, in my case, to bittorrent traffic. This box is a NAS and SAN serving several diskless boxes over iSCSI, NFS and CIFS, and its gigabit NIC sees a LOT of traffic all the time. However I hadn't seen this warning for over a month. Last week I downloaded and seeded at decent speeds (10-20Mbps) several distro DVDs, and I got three of these warnings in three days, all implicating the 100Mbps NIC. It's all circumstantial, but could be a clue as to the root cause. Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040017] [ cut here ] Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040027] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/net/sched/sch_generic.c:246 dev_watchdog+0x262/0x270() Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040030] Hardware name: GA-MA770-US3 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040032] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth1 (8139too): transmit queue 0 timed out Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040034] Modules linked in: binfmt_misc ppdev iscsi_trgt crc32c ib_iser rdma_cm ib_cm iw_cm ib_sa ib_mad ib_core ib_addr iscsi_tcp nfsd libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi nfs lockd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables i2c_piix4 serio_raw lp amd64_edac_mod edac_core k8temp parport xfs exportfs raid10 raid456 raid6_pq async_xor async_memcpy async_tx xor raid1 raid0 multipath 8139too 8139cp linear r8169 mii Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040066] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.31-19-server #56-Ubuntu Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040068] Call Trace: Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040070][] warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0xb0 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040079] [] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x40 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040082] [] dev_watchdog+0x262/0x270 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040086] [] ? ktime_get_ts+0x51/0x70 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040090] [] ? hpet_msi_next_event+0xf/0x20 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040094] [] ? clockevents_program_event+0x4f/0x90 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040097] [] ? tick_dev_program_event+0x40/0xd0 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040100] [] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x270 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040103] [] run_timer_softirq+0x16c/0x270 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040107] [] __do_softirq+0xbd/0x200 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040111] [] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040113] [] do_softirq+0x55/0x90 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040116] [] irq_exit+0x85/0x90 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040119] [] do_IRQ+0x70/0xe0 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040123] [] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x11 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040124][] ? native_safe_halt+0x6/0x10 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040130] [] ? default_idle+0x4c/0xe0 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040133] [] ? c1e_idle+0x5e/0x120 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040137] [] ? cpu_idle+0xb2/0x100 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040140] [] ? rest_init+0x66/0x70 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040144] [] ? start_kernel+0x352/0x35b Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040148] [] ? x86_64_start_reservations+0x125/0x129 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040151] [] ? x86_64_start_kernel+0xfa/0x109 Feb 22 19:15:44 nas kernel: [ 9062.040153] ---[ end trace 58f80f6497633a24 ]--- -- WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:398 inotify_remove_from_idr+0x7e/0x90() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481788 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
