[Bug 1958191] Re: [i915] Screen flickering in Ubuntu 22.04 (until i915.enable_dc=0 intel_idle.max_cstate=2 are added)
Same issue here. Heavy black flickering on the screen with Ubuntu 22.04 after upgrade from 20.04 and after a clean install. No extra repos, only default packages. Aspire 3 A315-31 series N17Q2 Mesa Intel® HD Graphics 500 (APL 2) Linux laptop 5.15.0-33-generic #34-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 18 13:34:26 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958191 Title: [i915] Screen flickering in Ubuntu 22.04 (until i915.enable_dc=0 intel_idle.max_cstate=2 are added) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1958191/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1988422] Re: device discoverable by default
Open setting on top right of the screen. Turn bluetooth on. As soon as BT is turned on for ubuntu 22.04, my laptop or desktop are visible to all nearby BT devices. Click pair with any device, the prompt will show up in ubuntu 22.04. From that on, I can send any files over BT and will be sent directly to downloads folder, malicious or not. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1988422 Title: device discoverable by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-bluetooth/+bug/1988422/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1988422] Re: device discoverable by default
There could be at least a prompt to turn off visibility to other devices. As for the sent files, a simple grep or zgrep to exclude some files from being sent to host via BT would be a security improvement. Specially because if the user has wine installed and a malicious .exe is sent... it can put the whole host in danger. Same for malicious scripts that can be used to escalate privileges on /home/user/downloads. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1988422 Title: device discoverable by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-bluetooth/+bug/1988422/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1988422] Re: Bluetooth discoverability is not communicated to the user adequately in Settings
Correct, and a prompt should be shown when possible malicious files are sent, to let the user decide if he wants to receive it or not. It's surreal that you can send any file type with any content and it will automatically be sent to the download folder without user input, as long as the device is paired. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1988422 Title: Bluetooth discoverability is not communicated to the user adequately in Settings To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1988422/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1999155] Re: UFW Disabled by default
We've decided that it's better for the tools to be available but not try to provide a default configuration -> then why isn't gufw (gtk gui for ufw) isn't installed by default for ubuntu desktop? Plasma 5 has a gui for the firewall inside the system settings. Since Ubuntu has altered the gnome-settings to add the ubuntu-settings portion (mainly to tweak the dock) why doesn't ubuntu with gnome have a similar tool for the desktop? Either making use of ufw or putting a way on the settings to add incoming and outgoing rules through a gui. Heck, even linux mint comes with gufw installed by default. As for the security and usability aspect, doing sudo ufw enable hasn't done anything to prevent me from working or doing my tasks on my machines. And rejecting incoming requests hasn't done it either so makes little to no sense for me that the firewall is disabled by default or not enabled with rejecting rule for incoming On the server side, I've got little to none outgoing rules and full reject for incoming for security reasons, and it has been a smooth experience. Perhaps that decision is a bit outdated? The FAQ page sent by you was last edited on 28-10-2022, but doesn't allow to see when the ufw part was last modified, but I suppose it was a long time ago. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1999155 Title: UFW Disabled by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+bug/1999155/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
