[Bug 1679329] Re: Missing dep8 tests
** Changed in: logwatch (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679329 Title: Missing dep8 tests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/+bug/1679329/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1937293] Re: package postgresql-12 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado paquete postgresql-12 script post-removal devolvió el código de salida de error 10
Hi, thank you for taking the time to file a bug report. After researching your issue, postgresql-12 is asking for the correct libpq5 version but your system seems that have more sources in which it finds an upper and not right version (13.3-1.pgdg20.04+1) that is not an ubuntu package indeed. We suggest you check your repos sources configuration to solve this. In case you'd like things to work cleanly, we suggest you to remove (or/and purge) all the third party sources and the packages installed from there (postgresql-13, at least) and then do a fresh install of postgresql-12 via apt. Since it seems likely to me that this is a local configuration problem, rather than a bug in Ubuntu, I am marking this bug as 'Incomplete'. However, if you believe that this is really a bug in Ubuntu, then we would be grateful if you would provide a more complete description of the problem with steps to reproduce, explain why you believe this is a bug in Ubuntu rather than a problem specific to your system, and then change the bug status back to "New". For local configuration issues, you can find assistance here: http://www.ubuntu.com/support/community ** Changed in: postgresql-12 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937293 Title: package postgresql-12 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado paquete postgresql-12 script post-removal devolvió el código de salida de error 10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgresql-12/+bug/1937293/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1937286] Re: containerd depends on unreleased docker19 package in focal
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report. It seems that your point is to use the latest containerd version with and old docker.io version. We kindly suggest, if it's possible for you, update to the latest docker.io version from updates repositories. We can't figure out more about your necessity of installing 19.03.8-0ubuntu1.20.04.1 version without more context from your side... it seems you're receiving only security updates, not updates, but we can't confirm that without more information. However, if you believe that this is really a bug in Ubuntu, then we would be grateful if you would provide a more complete description of the problem with steps to reproduce, explain why you believe this is a bug in Ubuntu rather than a problem specific to your system, and then change the bug status back to "New". For local configuration issues, you can find assistance here: http://www.ubuntu.com/support/community ** Changed in: containerd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937286 Title: containerd depends on unreleased docker19 package in focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/+bug/1937286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1938222] Re: package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.26-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado paquete mysql-server-8.0 script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de
** Changed in: mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938222 Title: package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.26-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado paquete mysql-server-8.0 script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/1938222/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange
Hello Niklas! You're welcome again. Thanks for adding more information... Good to know we can put Ansible apart from this. Anyway, we would need more information about the Kerberos configuration you mentioned before as you noticed it is involved because we don't have the complete picture to reproduce the issue. Also sshd configuration is needed for both client and server. In the time we receive that, I will mark the report as "Incomplete", but thanks a lot for progressing on it. When you submit new information, please mark the bug as "New" so we can continue with it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938144 Title: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1938144/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1938456] Re: allow to build without udeb packages
** Changed in: bind9-libs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938456 Title: allow to build without udeb packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9-libs/+bug/1938456/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067480] Re: MRE updates of dpdk 23.11.2(Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy)
Jammy OK Status log and log of testing dpdk standalone and in-conjunction with Open vSwitch (internal tests) for Jammy: ubuntu@node-horsea:~/dpdk-testing$ cat dpdk-test.status PHYS_TESTPMD VIRT_SPAWNGUESTS VIRT_TESTPMD VIRT_L2FWD BENCH_OVS VUC_BENCH_OVSDPDK VUC_ENDURANCE_STARTSTOP VUC_ENDURANCE_ADDREMOVEPORT 1.0.0 (07:36:24): phys (BM) tests 1.1.0 (07:36:24): initialize environment 1.1.1 (07:37:23): testpmd => Pass 1.1.2 (07:38:24): check testpmd output => Pass 2.0.0 (07:38:24): prep virtual test environment 1.0.0 (07:40:59): virt tests 1.1.0 (07:40:59): initialize environment 3.0.0 (07:41:56): performance tests 3.1.0 (07:41:56): prep benchmarks 3.2.0 (07:42:45): performance tests 3.2.1 (07:42:52): test guest-openvswitch for OVS-5CPU => Pass 3.2.2 (08:02:19): test guest-dpdk-vhost-user-client-multiq for OVSDPDK-VUC => Pass 4.0.0 (08:21:52): VUC endurance checks 4.1.0 (08:21:52): prep VUC endurance tests 4.1.1 (08:35:38): start stop guests (client) => Pass 4.1.2 (09:40:27): add/remove ports (client) => Pass ** Attachment added: "jammy-0.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2067480/+attachment/5817961/+files/jammy-0.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067480 Title: MRE updates of dpdk 23.11.2(Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2067480/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067480] Re: MRE updates of dpdk 23.11.2(Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy)
Jammy OK Status log and log of testing dpdk standalone and in-conjunction with Open vSwitch (internal tests) for Jammy: ubuntu@node-horsea:~/dpdk-testing$ cat dpdk-test.status PHYS_TESTPMD VIRT_SPAWNGUESTS VIRT_TESTPMD VIRT_L2FWD BENCH_OVS VUC_BENCH_OVSDPDK VUC_ENDURANCE_STARTSTOP VUC_ENDURANCE_ADDREMOVEPORT 1.0.0 (07:36:24): phys (BM) tests 1.1.0 (07:36:24): initialize environment 1.1.1 (07:37:23): testpmd => Pass 1.1.2 (07:38:24): check testpmd output => Pass 2.0.0 (07:38:24): prep virtual test environment 1.0.0 (07:40:59): virt tests 1.1.0 (07:40:59): initialize environment 3.0.0 (07:41:56): performance tests 3.1.0 (07:41:56): prep benchmarks 3.2.0 (07:42:45): performance tests 3.2.1 (07:42:52): test guest-openvswitch for OVS-5CPU => Pass 3.2.2 (08:02:19): test guest-dpdk-vhost-user-client-multiq for OVSDPDK-VUC => Pass 4.0.0 (08:21:52): VUC endurance checks 4.1.0 (08:21:52): prep VUC endurance tests 4.1.1 (08:35:38): start stop guests (client) => Pass 4.1.2 (09:40:27): add/remove ports (client) => Pass ** Attachment added: "jammy-0.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2067480/+attachment/5817960/+files/jammy-0.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067480 Title: MRE updates of dpdk 23.11.2(Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2067480/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2024067] Re: geoalchemy2: autopkgtest regression on s390x: AssertionError
They skipped the test in version 0.13.3-2 [1] geoalchemy2 (0.13.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Skip tests that fail on big-endian architectures, specifically s390x. Upstream is aware of the failing tests. (Closes: #1034304). -- Edward Betts Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:11:34 +0100 but added them again in version 0.15.1-1 [2] * Reduced the number of skipped tests: - Optimized the test suite to minimize the number of skipped tests, ensuring more comprehensive test coverage. [1] https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/geoalchemy2/tree/debian/changelog?h=ubuntu/oracular#n3 [2] https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/geoalchemy2/tree/debian/changelog?h=ubuntu%2Foracular-devel#n17 Maybe we could skip them again ... I retriggered the s390x for the new package but I'm having issues launching them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024067 Title: geoalchemy2: autopkgtest regression on s390x: AssertionError To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/geoalchemy2/+bug/2024067/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071941] [NEW] New tests added last version are failing
Public bug reported:
Autopkgtests are failing [1]. Important part of the log is:
══ Failed tests
213s ── Error ('test-rope_range.R:34:3'): rope_range
213s Error in `.fun(model_code = .x1)`: Boost not found; call
install.packages('BH')
213s Backtrace:
213s ▆
213s 1. ├─base::suppressWarnings(...) at test-rope_range.R:34:3
213s 2. │ └─base::withCallingHandlers(...)
213s 3. └─brms::brm(mpg ~ wt + gear, data = mtcars, iter = 300)
213s 4. └─brms::do_call(compile_model, compile_args)
213s 5. └─brms:::eval2(call, envir = args, enclos = envir)
213s 6. └─base::eval(expr, envir, ...)
213s 7. └─base::eval(expr, envir, ...)
213s 8. └─brms (local) .fun(...)
213s 9. └─brms (local) .compile_model(model, ...)
213s 10. ├─brms:::eval_silent(...)
213s 11. │ └─base::eval(expr, envir)
213s 12. │ └─base::eval(expr, envir)
213s 13. └─brms::do_call(rstan::stan_model, args)
213s 14. └─brms:::eval2(call, envir = args, enclos = envir)
213s 15. └─base::eval(expr, envir, ...)
213s 16. └─base::eval(expr, envir, ...)
213s 17. └─rstan (local) .fun(model_code = .x1)
213s ── Error ('test-rope_range.R:45:3'): rope_range (multivariate)
─
213s Error in `.fun(model_code = .x1)`: Boost not found; call
install.packages('BH')
213s Backtrace:
213s ▆
213s 1. ├─base::suppressWarnings(...) at test-rope_range.R:45:3
213s 2. │ └─base::withCallingHandlers(...)
213s 3. └─brms::brm(...)
213s 4. └─brms::do_call(compile_model, compile_args)
213s 5. └─brms:::eval2(call, envir = args, enclos = envir)
213s 6. └─base::eval(expr, envir, ...)
213s 7. └─base::eval(expr, envir, ...)
213s 8. └─brms (local) .fun(...)
213s 9. └─brms (local) .compile_model(model, ...)
213s 10. ├─brms:::eval_silent(...)
213s 11. │ └─base::eval(expr, envir)
213s 12. │ └─base::eval(expr, envir)
213s 13. └─brms::do_call(rstan::stan_model, args)
213s 14. └─brms:::eval2(call, envir = args, enclos = envir)
213s 15. └─base::eval(expr, envir, ...)
213s 16. └─base::eval(expr, envir, ...)
213s 17. └─rstan (local) .fun(model_code = .x1)
213s ── Error ('test-rope.R:75:1'): (code run outside of `test_that()`)
─
213s Error in `.fun(model_code = .x1)`: Boost not found; call
install.packages('BH')
213s Backtrace:
213s ▆
213s 1. ├─base::suppressWarnings(...) at test-rope.R:75:1
213s 2. │ └─base::withCallingHandlers(...)
213s 3. └─brms::brm(mpg ~ wt + gear, data = mtcars, iter = 500)
213s 4. └─brms::do_call(compile_model, compile_args)
213s 5. └─brms:::eval2(call, envir = args, enclos = envir)
213s 6. └─base::eval(expr, envir, ...)
213s 7. └─base::eval(expr, envir, ...)
213s 8. └─brms (local) .fun(...)
213s 9. └─brms (local) .compile_model(model, ...)
213s 10. ├─brms:::eval_silent(...)
213s 11. │ └─base::eval(expr, envir)
213s 12. │ └─base::eval(expr, envir)
213s 13. └─brms::do_call(rstan::stan_model, args)
213s 14. └─brms:::eval2(call, envir = args, enclos = envir)
213s 15. └─base::eval(expr, envir, ...)
213s 16. └─base::eval(expr, envir, ...)
213s 17. └─rstan (local) .fun(model_code = .x1)
213s
Those failing tests were commented in previous package (e.g. [2]).
The "Boost not found; call install.packages('BH')" suggest that r-cran-
bh package is not installed, which is false. Some online researching
suggests a restart, so I'm adding that to the test control.
If not successful on that, I suggest to comment the test again to unblock
r-cran-effectsize [3]
[1]
https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest-oracular/oracular/arm64/r/r-cran-bayestestr/20240701_001624_0d606@/log.gz
[2]
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-bayestestr/-/blob/ad3c30a8154f677cab9f124290c4fb575cc14f05/tests/testthat/test-rope_range.R#L32
[3]
https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#r-cran-effectsize
** Affects: r-cran-bayestestr (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071941
Title:
New tests added last version are failing
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/r-cran-bayestestr/+bug/2071941/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
[Bug 2071941] Re: New tests added last version are failing
(ofyi) The following didn't work: +++ b/debian/tests/control [...] -Restrictions: allow-stderr +Restrictions: allow-stderr, needs-reboot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071941 Title: New tests added last version are failing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/r-cran-bayestestr/+bug/2071941/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071941] Re: New tests added last version are failing
** Changed in: r-cran-bayestestr (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) ** Changed in: r-cran-bayestestr (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071941 Title: New tests added last version are failing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/r-cran-bayestestr/+bug/2071941/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067480] Re: MRE updates of dpdk 23.11.1(Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy)
DPDK 23.11.2 is out (https://doc.dpdk.org/guides-23.11/rel_notes/release_23_11.html#id1), so this will be the version we prepare for Noble... Updating description. ** Description changed: 23.11.1 for Oracular is in -proposed and nearly to be completed. Therefore the MREs for Noble, Mantic and Jammy can be handled now (Mantic EOL will occur at the end of July, so we're trying to update it before it happens, but it might be optional at the end). This bug tracks an update for the DPDK packages in: - - Noble 23.11 -> 23.11.1 + - Noble 23.11 -> 23.11.2 - Mantic 22.11.4 -> 22.11.5 - Jammy 21.11.6 -> 21.11.7 This update includes bugfixes only following the SRU policy exception defined at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/DPDK. No new features added; a classic stable release with a bunch of fixes aggregated and enhanced testing by the companies being part of the DPDK community. [Impact] Stable release update so not directly applicable; see the exception policy document linked above. For Reference - former cases are here: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1784816 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1817675 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1836365 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1912464 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1940913 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2002404 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2026351 [Major Changes] Listed by upstream in detail - Noble - 23.11.1: - https://doc.dpdk.org/guides-23.11/rel_notes/release_23_11.html#release-notes + Noble - 23.11.2: + https://doc.dpdk.org/guides-23.11/rel_notes/release_23_11.html#id1 Mantic - 22.11.5: https://doc.dpdk.org/guides-22.11/rel_notes/release_22_11.html#id11 Jammy - 21.11.7: https://doc.dpdk.org/guides-21.11/rel_notes/release_21_11.html#id22 [Test Plan] See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/DPDK#SRU_TestVerify [Regression Potential] Upstream performs extensive testing before release, giving us a high degree of confidence in the general case. There problems are most likely to manifest in Ubuntu-specific integrations, such as in relation to the versions of dependencies available and other packaging-specific matters. Therefore that is what our verification focuses on. ** Summary changed: - MRE updates of dpdk 23.11.1(Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy) + MRE updates of dpdk 23.11.2(Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067480 Title: MRE updates of dpdk 23.11.2(Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2067480/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067480] Re: MRE updates of dpdk 23.11.2(Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy)
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+git/dpdk/+merge/472484 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067480 Title: MRE updates of dpdk 23.11.2(Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2067480/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067480] Re: MRE updates of dpdk 23.11.2(Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy)
Status log and log of testing dpdk standalone and in-conjunction with Open vSwitch (internal tests): ubuntu@node-horsea:~/dpdk/testing/noble-oracular-cycle/dpdk-testing$ cat dpdk-test.status PHYS_TESTPMD VIRT_SPAWNGUESTS VIRT_TESTPMD VIRT_L2FWD BENCH_OVS VUC_BENCH_OVSDPDK VUC_ENDURANCE_STARTSTOP VUC_ENDURANCE_ADDREMOVEPORT 1.0.0 (13:51:11): phys (BM) tests 1.1.0 (13:51:11): initialize environment 1.1.1 (13:52:44): testpmd => Pass 1.1.2 (13:53:37): check testpmd output => Pass 2.0.0 (13:53:37): prep virtual test environment 1.0.0 (13:56:11): virt tests 1.1.0 (13:56:11): initialize environment 3.0.0 (13:57:02): performance tests 3.1.0 (13:57:02): prep benchmarks 3.2.0 (13:57:24): performance tests 3.2.1 (13:57:33): test guest-openvswitch for OVS-5CPU => Pass 3.2.2 (14:18:20): test guest-dpdk-vhost-user-client-multiq for OVSDPDK-VUC => Pass 4.0.0 (14:40:41): VUC endurance checks 4.1.0 (14:40:41): prep VUC endurance tests 4.1.1 (14:58:10): start stop guests (client) => Pass 4.1.2 (16:03:20): add/remove ports (client) => Pass 4.2.0 (16:12:48): Final cleanup ** Attachment added: "dpdk_23.11.2-seahorsetests-noble.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2067480/+attachment/5813879/+files/dpdk_23.11.2-seahorsetests-noble.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067480 Title: MRE updates of dpdk 23.11.2(Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2067480/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080354] [NEW] [FFe] Upgrade dpdk from 23.11.1-2 to 23.11.2
Public bug reported: We currently have dpdk 23.11.1-2 in Oracular, but version 23.11.2 with only fixes has been released upstream recently [1]. We also want also to do this upgrade in Noble as they are the same dpdk series (bug 2067480). Even more, the package for noble has been created and tested and is under revision [2], so we need the higher version also in Oracular. [1] https://doc.dpdk.org/guides-23.11/rel_notes/release_23_11.html#id1 [2] https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+git/dpdk/+merge/472484 ** Affects: dpdk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: ubuntu-release -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080354 Title: [FFe] Upgrade dpdk from 23.11.1-2 to 23.11.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2080354/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064391] Re: Merge bridge-utils from Debian unstable for oracular
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/bridge-utils/+git/bridge-utils/+merge/466451 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064391 Title: Merge bridge-utils from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bridge-utils/+bug/2064391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064391] Re: Merge bridge-utils from Debian unstable for oracular
** Changed in: bridge-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064391 Title: Merge bridge-utils from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bridge-utils/+bug/2064391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067480] [NEW] MRE updates 23.11.1 (Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy)/
Public bug reported: 23.11.1 for Oracular is in -proposed and nearly to be completed. Therefore the MREs for Noble, Mantic and Jammy can be handled now (Mantic EOL will occur at the end of July, so we're trying to update it before it happens, but it might be optional at the end). This bug tracks an update for the DPDK packages in: - Noble 23.11 -> 23.11.1 - Mantic 22.11.4 -> 22.11.5 - Jammy 21.11.6 -> 21.11.7 This update includes bugfixes only following the SRU policy exception defined at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/DPDK. No new features added; a classic stable release with a bunch of fixes aggregated and enhanced testing by the companies being part of the DPDK community. [Impact] Stable release update so not directly applicable; see the exception policy document linked above. For Reference - former cases are here: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1784816 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1817675 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1836365 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1912464 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1940913 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2002404 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2026351 [Major Changes] Listed by upstream in detail Noble - 23.11.1: https://doc.dpdk.org/guides-23.11/rel_notes/release_23_11.html#release-notes Mantic - 22.11.5: https://doc.dpdk.org/guides-22.11/rel_notes/release_22_11.html#id11 Jammy - 21.11.6: https://doc.dpdk.org/guides-21.11/rel_notes/release_21_11.html#id17 [Test Plan] See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/DPDK#SRU_TestVerify [Regression Potential] Upstream performs extensive testing before release, giving us a high degree of confidence in the general case. There problems are most likely to manifest in Ubuntu-specific integrations, such as in relation to the versions of dependencies available and other packaging-specific matters. Therefore that is what our verification focuses on. ** Affects: dpdk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) Status: New ** Affects: dpdk (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: dpdk (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: dpdk (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dpdk (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dpdk (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dpdk (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067480 Title: MRE updates 23.11.1 (Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy)/ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2067480/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067480] Re: MRE updates 23.11.1 (Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy)/
** Description changed: 23.11.1 for Oracular is in -proposed and nearly to be completed. Therefore the MREs for Noble, Mantic and Jammy can be handled now (Mantic EOL will occur at the end of July, so we're trying to update it before it happens, but it might be optional at the end). This bug tracks an update for the DPDK packages in: - Noble 23.11 -> 23.11.1 - Mantic 22.11.4 -> 22.11.5 - Jammy 21.11.6 -> 21.11.7 This update includes bugfixes only following the SRU policy exception defined at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/DPDK. No new features added; a classic stable release with a bunch of fixes aggregated and enhanced testing by the companies being part of the DPDK community. [Impact] Stable release update so not directly applicable; see the exception policy document linked above. For Reference - former cases are here: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1784816 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1817675 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1836365 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1912464 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1940913 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2002404 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2026351 [Major Changes] Listed by upstream in detail Noble - 23.11.1: https://doc.dpdk.org/guides-23.11/rel_notes/release_23_11.html#release-notes Mantic - 22.11.5: https://doc.dpdk.org/guides-22.11/rel_notes/release_22_11.html#id11 - Jammy - 21.11.6: - https://doc.dpdk.org/guides-21.11/rel_notes/release_21_11.html#id17 + Jammy - 21.11.7: + https://doc.dpdk.org/guides-21.11/rel_notes/release_21_11.html#id22 + [Test Plan] See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/DPDK#SRU_TestVerify [Regression Potential] Upstream performs extensive testing before release, giving us a high degree of confidence in the general case. There problems are most likely to manifest in Ubuntu-specific integrations, such as in relation to the versions of dependencies available and other packaging-specific matters. Therefore that is what our verification focuses on. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067480 Title: MRE updates 23.11.1 (Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy)/ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2067480/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067480] Re: MRE updates 23.11.1 (Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy)/
** Tags added: needs-mre-backport -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067480 Title: MRE updates 23.11.1(Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2067480/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067480] Re: MRE updates 23.11.1(Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy)
** Summary changed: - MRE updates 23.11.1 (Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy)/ + MRE updates 23.11.1(Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067480 Title: MRE updates 23.11.1(Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2067480/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063046] Re: build-depends on obsolete python3-nose-timer
** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063046 Title: build-depends on obsolete python3-nose-timer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/2063046/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068019] [NEW] Upgrade to v2.11.1.4 on Oracular (24.10)
Public bug reported: The latest version was released upstream on April 26, and it is GA since 5 days ago, as per [1] We are currently at version 2.9.1.1. This bug will serve to track the upgrade before starting with the corresponding MREs. [1] https://github.com/Azure/WALinuxAgent/releases/tag/v2.11.1.4 ** Affects: walinuxagent (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) Status: New ** Tags: upgrade-software-version -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068019 Title: Upgrade to v2.11.1.4 on Oracular (24.10) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/2068019/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068021] [NEW] MRE updates 2.11.1.4 into N/J/F
Public bug reported: [Impact] This release contains both bug-fixes and new features and we would like to make sure all of our supported customers have access to these improvements. The notable ones are: * 2.11.1.4 [ https://github.com/Azure/WALinuxAgent/releases/tag/v2.11.1.4 ]: * 2.10.0.8 [ https://github.com/Azure/WALinuxAgent/releases/tag/v2.10.0.8 ]: See the changelog entry below for a full list of changes and bugs. (TBD) [Test Case] The following development and SRU process was followed: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/walinuxagentUpdates The Microsoft Azure Linux Agent team will execute their testsuite, which includes extension testing , against the walinuxagent that is in -proposed. A successful run will be required before the proposed walinuxagent can be let into -updates. The CPC team will be in charge of attaching a summary of testing to the bug. CPC team members will not mark ‘verification-done’ until this has happened. ** Affects: walinuxagent (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) Status: New ** Affects: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: needs-mre-backport ** Also affects: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068021 Title: MRE updates 2.11.1.4 into N/J/F To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/2068021/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063046] Re: build-depends on obsolete python3-nose-timer
I created a patch with the PR #3081 commented above, but the test part on the building fails because the source tree is incomplete/not matching: a refactor was done in [1] and included on a more recent version of WALinuxagent [2]. Therefore, the plan is to first upgrade WALinuxagent to the latest released version (bug 2068019) and then apply the patch from #3081. [1] https://github.com/Azure/WALinuxAgent/pull/2902 [2] https://github.com/Azure/WALinuxAgent/releases/tag/v2.10.0.8 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063046 Title: build-depends on obsolete python3-nose-timer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/2063046/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061134] Re: geophar.pyw crashed with ModuleNotFoundError in /usr/share/geophar/wxgeometrie/dependances.py: No module named 'imp'
Hi, The bug seems to be fixed in the higher version 18.10+dfsg1-1, according to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058261#10. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1058261 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058261 ** Also affects: geophar (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058261 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061134 Title: geophar.pyw crashed with ModuleNotFoundError in /usr/share/geophar/wxgeometrie/dependances.py: No module named 'imp' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/geophar/+bug/2061134/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2040463] Re: MRE updates of dpdk in the 24.04 cycle
* For Mantic arm64 [1], going deeper into this tests failures 6655s 157: conntrack - floating IP FAILED (ovs- macros.at:247) for kmod test. For s390x [2], kmod test suite is also failing, slightly different: 1317s 69: conntrack - zones from other field, more tests FAILED (system-traffic.at:3374) [1] https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest- mantic/mantic/arm64/o/openvswitch/20240322_201709_e53bb@/log.gz [2] https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest- mantic/mantic/s390x/o/openvswitch/20240322_134250_a9b5b@/log.gz * For Jammy, it's blocked (BLOCKED: Needs an approval (either due to a freeze, the source suite or a manual hint)). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040463 Title: MRE updates of dpdk in the 24.04 cycle To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2040463/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2023971] Re: [MIR] libmail-dmarc-perl
After Miha did the security review, he found that dmarc_receive was
failing. It wasn't covered here as dmarc's binary scripts are not used
by spamassassin, but I thought it was worth checking.
The steps to reproduce (thanks Miha!) were:
1) Create dmarc xml based on google's example
2) Convert to gzipped base64
$ cat dmarc_example.xml | gzip | base64 > dmarc_example.xml.gz.base64
3) Copy base64 into example email (test_email.eml) from
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7489#appendix-B.5
4) Run dmarc_receive
$ dmarc_receive --file test_mail.eml &> out.txt
The bad output contains "Can't locate object method "getline" via
package "From: dmarc-reporting@mail.receiver.example ..."
I caught the bug and amended it:
diff -Nru
libmail-dmarc-perl-1.20230215/debian/patches/use-MIME-Entity-and-MIME-Parser-from-libmime-tools-p.patch
libmail-dmarc-perl-1.20230215/debian/patches/use-MIME-Entity-and-MIME-Parser-from-libmime-tools-p.patch
---
libmail-dmarc-perl-1.20230215/debian/patches/use-MIME-Entity-and-MIME-Parser-from-libmime-tools-p.patch
2023-12-11 14:43:31.0 +
+++
libmail-dmarc-perl-1.20230215/debian/patches/use-MIME-Entity-and-MIME-Parser-from-libmime-tools-p.patch
2023-12-11 14:43:31.0 +
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@
-foreach my $part ( Email::MIME->new( $email->as_string )->parts ) {
-my ($c_type) = split /;/, $part->content_type || '';
+my $parser = MIME::Parser->new;
-+foreach my $part ( $parser->parse( $email->as_string )->parts_DFS ) {
++foreach my $part ( $parser->parse_data( $email->as_string )->parts_DFS ) {
+next if defined(!$part->bodyhandle); # something to process
+my ($c_type) = split /;/, $part->effective_type || '';
next if $c_type eq 'text/plain';
dmarc building tests are passing [1] and also autopkgtests that cover
the splitting:
autopkgtest [14:02:18]: test splitting-check: [---
autopkgtest [14:03:08]: test splitting-check: ---]
autopkgtest [14:03:09]: test splitting-check: - - - - - - - - - - results - -
- - - - - - - -
splitting-check PASS
autopkgtest [14:03:10]: summary
splitting-check PASS
Spamassassin test for dmarc also passes:
root@NDmarc-spamassassin-tests:~/spamassassin# make test TEST_FILES="t/dmarc.t"
"/usr/bin/perl" build/mkrules --exit_on_no_src --src rulesrc --out rules
--manifest MANIFEST --manifestskip MANIFEST.SKIP
mkrules: no rules updated
"/usr/bin/perl" build/preprocessor -Mvars -DVERSION="4.00"
-DPREFIX="/usr/local" -DDEF_RULES_DIR="/usr/local/share/spamassassin"
-DLOCAL_RULES_DIR="/etc/mail/spamassassin"
-DLOCAL_STATE_DIR="/var/lib/spamassassin"
-DINSTALLSITELIB="/usr/local/share/perl/5.38.2" -DCONTACT_ADDRESS="the
administrator of that system" -DRE2C_BIN="re2c" -Msharpbang -Mconditional
-DPERL_BIN=""/usr/bin/perl"" -DPERL_WARN="" -DPERL_TAINT="" -m755
-isa-update.raw -osa-update
cp sa-update blib/script/sa-update
"/usr/bin/perl" -MExtUtils::MY -e 'MY->fixin(shift)' -- blib/script/sa-update
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 "/usr/bin/perl" "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-MTest::Harness"
"-e" "undef *Test::Harness::Switches; test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')"
t/dmarc.t
t/dmarc.t .. Apr 9 12:29:54.780 [9230] warn: deprecated method; size() is an
alias of "UDPsize()" at ../blib/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm line 602.
t/dmarc.t .. 1/18 Apr 9 12:29:59.035 [9232] warn: deprecated method; size() is
an alias of "UDPsize()" at ../blib/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm line
602.
t/dmarc.t .. 3/18 Apr 9 12:30:03.208 [9234] warn: deprecated method; size() is
an alias of "UDPsize()" at ../blib/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm line
602.
t/dmarc.t .. 5/18 Apr 9 12:30:06.210 [9236] warn: deprecated method; size() is
an alias of "UDPsize()" at ../blib/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm line
602.
t/dmarc.t .. 7/18 Apr 9 12:30:09.197 [9238] warn: deprecated method; size() is
an alias of "UDPsize()" at ../blib/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm line
602.
t/dmarc.t .. 9/18 Apr 9 12:30:12.643 [9240] warn: deprecated method; size() is
an alias of "UDPsize()" at ../blib/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm line
602.
t/dmarc.t .. 11/18 Apr 9 12:30:17.225 [9242] warn: deprecated method; size()
is an alias of "UDPsize()" at ../blib/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm line
602.
t/dmarc.t .. 13/18 Apr 9 12:30:21.491 [9244] warn: deprecated method; size()
is an alias of "UDPsize()" at ../blib/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm line
602.
t/dmarc.t .. 15/18 Apr 9 12:30:25.294 [9246] warn: deprecated method; size()
is an alias of "UDPsize()" at ../blib/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm line
602.
t/dmarc.t .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=18, 34 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 12.72 cusr 1.55
csys = 14.29 CPU)
Result: PASS
I upload the fixed package at
https://launchpad.net/~mirespace/+archive/ubuntu/libmail-dmarc-perl-
suggested/ as I've been doing (fixed pa
[Bug 2023971] Re: [MIR] libmail-dmarc-perl
Regarding the debate about libmime-tools-perl vs libemail-mime-perl, I checked that libemail-mime-perl is not being used in the last version of spamassassin directly: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/spamassassin/-/blob/master/debian/control?ref_type=heads -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023971 Title: [MIR] libmail-dmarc-perl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmail-dmarc-perl/+bug/2023971/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060784] [NEW] FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
Public bug reported: bristolmemorymoog.c:280:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘doPitchWheel’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 280 | doPitchWheel(baudio); | ^~~~ https://launchpadlibrarian.net/723978750/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-armhf.bristol_0.60.11-4build2_BUILDING.txt.gz ** Affects: bristol (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060784 Title: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bristol/+bug/2060784/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060784] Re: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
I found an upstream's patch that deals with this and other implicit warnings like : audioEngine.c:85:1: warning: type of ‘fragSize’ defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int] 85 | initAudioDevice2(audioDev, devID, fragSize) https://sourceforge.net/p/bristol/patches/3/ ** Changed in: bristol (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060784 Title: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bristol/+bug/2060784/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060784] Re: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
** Changed in: bristol (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060784 Title: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bristol/+bug/2060784/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060784] Re: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/bristol/+git/bristol/+merge/464004 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060784 Title: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bristol/+bug/2060784/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060784] Re: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
Patch forwarded to Debian. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1066243 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066243 ** Also affects: bristol (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066243 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060784 Title: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bristol/+bug/2060784/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2040463] Re: MRE updates of dpdk in the 24.04 cycle
Internal test for Mantic proposed passed OK. Result of doing sudo ./test.sh -P -r mantic -R mantic 2>&1 | tee output.log on Mantic: Status log and log of testing dpdk standalone and in- conjunction with Open vSwitch (internal tests) Finished, overall status: + cat dpdk-test.status PHYS_TESTPMD VIRT_SPAWNGUESTS VIRT_TESTPMD VIRT_L2FWD BENCH_OVS VUC_BENCH_OVSDPDK VUC_ENDURANCE_STARTSTOP VUC_ENDURANCE_ADDREMOVEPORT 1.0.0 (09:54:01): phys (BM) tests 1.1.0 (09:54:01): initialize environment 1.1.1 (09:56:56): testpmd => Pass 1.1.2 (09:58:20): check testpmd output => Pass 2.0.0 (09:58:20): prep virtual test environment 1.0.0 (10:26:15): virt tests 1.1.0 (10:26:15): initialize environment 3.0.0 (10:26:59): performance tests 3.1.0 (10:26:59): prep benchmarks 3.2.0 (10:27:58): performance tests 3.2.1 (10:28:08): test guest-openvswitch for OVS-5CPU => Pass 3.2.2 (10:47:52): test guest-dpdk-vhost-user-client-multiq for OVSDPDK-VUC => Pass 4.0.0 (11:08:21): VUC endurance checks 4.1.0 (11:08:21): prep VUC endurance tests 4.1.1 (11:22:32): start stop guests (client) => Pass 4.1.2 (12:24:19): add/remove ports (client) => Pass 4.2.0 (12:34:03): Final cleanup+ echo '' + exit 100 ** Attachment added: "output-Mantic-proposed.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2040463/+attachment/5763652/+files/output-Mantic-proposed.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040463 Title: MRE updates of dpdk in the 24.04 cycle To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2040463/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060959] [NEW] FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration - qsort
Public bug reported: /<>/stellarsolver/astrometry/os-features.h:123:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘qsort_r’; did you mean ‘qsort’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 123 | #define QSORT_R qsort_r | ^~~ /<>/stellarsolver/astrometry/util/bl-sort.c:68:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘QSORT_R’ 68 | QSORT_R(NODE_DATA(node), node->N, list->datasize, &ft, qcompare); | ^~~ https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724118070/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-armhf.stellarsolver_2.5-1build2_BUILDING.txt.gz It seems to be fixed on upstream: https://github.com/rlancaste/stellarsolver/pull/139 ** Affects: stellarsolver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) Status: In Progress ** Affects: stellarsolver (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1066275 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066275 ** Also affects: stellarsolver (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066275 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: stellarsolver (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) ** Changed in: stellarsolver (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060959 Title: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration - qsort To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stellarsolver/+bug/2060959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060959] Re: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration - qsort
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/stellarsolver/+git/stellarsolver/+merge/464130 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060959 Title: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration - qsort To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stellarsolver/+bug/2060959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2040463] Re: MRE updates of dpdk in the 24.04 cycle
On Mantic, testing upgrading path, removing and installation : All OK. ## Upgrading #Installing previous version: root@Mdpdk:~# apt install dpdk Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done The following additional packages will be installed: ibverbs-providers libfdt1 libibverbs1 libnl-route-3-200 librte-bus-auxiliary23 librte-bus-pci23 librte-bus-vdev23 librte-bus-vmbus23 librte-common-mlx5-23 librte-cryptodev23 librte-dmadev23 librte-eal23 librte-ethdev23 librte-gso23 librte-hash23 librte-ip-frag23 librte-kvargs23 librte-mbuf23 librte-mempool-ring23 librte-mempool23 librte-meter23 librte-net-af-packet23 librte-net-bond23 librte-net-e1000-23 librte-net-fm10k23 librte-net-i40e23 librte-net-ixgbe23 librte-net-mlx4-23 librte-net-mlx5-23 librte-net-netvsc23 librte-net-pcap23 librte-net-tap23 librte-net-thunderx23 librte-net-vdev-netvsc23 librte-net-vhost23 librte-net-virtio23 librte-net-vmxnet3-23 librte-net23 librte-pci23 librte-rcu23 librte-ring23 librte-sched23 librte-security23 librte-telemetry23 librte-vhost23 python3-pyelftools rdma-core Suggested packages: dpdk-doc dpdk-kmods-dkms librte-meta-baseband librte-meta-bus librte-meta-common librte-meta-compress librte-meta-crypto librte-meta-dma librte-meta-event librte-meta-mempool librte-meta-net librte-meta-raw librte-meta-allpmds The following NEW packages will be installed: dpdk ibverbs-providers libfdt1 libibverbs1 libnl-route-3-200 librte-bus-auxiliary23 librte-bus-pci23 librte-bus-vdev23 librte-bus-vmbus23 librte-common-mlx5-23 librte-cryptodev23 librte-dmadev23 librte-eal23 librte-ethdev23 librte-gso23 librte-hash23 librte-ip-frag23 librte-kvargs23 librte-mbuf23 librte-mempool-ring23 librte-mempool23 librte-meter23 librte-net-af-packet23 librte-net-bond23 librte-net-e1000-23 librte-net-fm10k23 librte-net-i40e23 librte-net-ixgbe23 librte-net-mlx4-23 librte-net-mlx5-23 librte-net-netvsc23 librte-net-pcap23 librte-net-tap23 librte-net-thunderx23 librte-net-vdev-netvsc23 librte-net-vhost23 librte-net-virtio23 librte-net-vmxnet3-23 librte-net23 librte-pci23 librte-rcu23 librte-ring23 librte-sched23 librte-security23 librte-telemetry23 librte-vhost23 python3-pyelftools rdma-core 0 upgraded, 48 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 3299 kB of archives. After this operation, 11.6 MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] [...] Setting up dpdk (22.11.3-1) ... [...] #Upgrading root@Mdpdk:~# apt upgrade -t mantic-proposed dpdk Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: linux-headers-6.5.0-33 linux-headers-6.5.0-33-generic linux-image-6.5.0-33-generic linux-modules-6.5.0-33-generic The following packages will be upgraded: dpdk grub-common grub-efi-amd64-bin grub-efi-amd64-signed grub-pc grub-pc-bin grub2-common landscape-common librte-bus-auxiliary23 librte-bus-pci23 librte-bus-vdev23 librte-bus-vmbus23 librte-common-mlx5-23 librte-cryptodev23 librte-dmadev23 librte-eal23 librte-ethdev23 librte-gso23 librte-hash23 librte-ip-frag23 librte-kvargs23 librte-mbuf23 librte-mempool-ring23 librte-mempool23 librte-meter23 librte-net-af-packet23 librte-net-bond23 librte-net-e1000-23 librte-net-fm10k23 librte-net-i40e23 librte-net-ixgbe23 librte-net-mlx4-23 librte-net-mlx5-23 librte-net-netvsc23 librte-net-pcap23 librte-net-tap23 librte-net-thunderx23 librte-net-vdev-netvsc23 librte-net-vhost23 librte-net-virtio23 librte-net-vmxnet3-23 librte-net23 librte-pci23 librte-rcu23 librte-ring23 librte-sched23 librte-security23 librte-telemetry23 librte-vhost23 linux-headers-generic linux-headers-virtual linux-image-virtual linux-virtual openssh-client openssh-server openssh-sftp-server ubuntu-advantage-tools ubuntu-pro-client ubuntu-pro-client-l10n 59 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 80.7 MB of archives. After this operation, 166 MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] [...] root@Mdpdk:~# dpkg -l dpdk | grep dpdk ii dpdk 22.11.4-0ubuntu0.23.10.1 amd64Data Plane Development Kit (runtime) #Removing after upgrade root@Mdpdk:~# apt remove --purge dpdk Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: ibverbs-providers libfdt1 libibverbs1 libnl-route-3-200 librte-bus-auxiliary23 librte-bus-pci23 librte-bus-vdev23 librte-bus-vmbus23 librte-common-mlx5-23 librte-cryptodev23 librte-dmadev23 librte-eal23 librte-ethdev23 librte-gso23 librte-hash23 librte-ip-frag23 librte-kvargs23 librte-mbuf23 librte-mempool-ring23 librte-mempool23 librte-meter23 librte-net-af-packet23 librte-net-bond23 librte-net-e1000-23 librte-net-fm10k23
[Bug 2061024] [NEW] FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
Public bug reported:
src/main.c:164:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘LOG’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
164 | LOG( RAMOND_CRITICAL "! socket recvmsg error: '%s'\n",
| ^~~
src/main.c: In function ‘executeActions’:
src/main.c:570:17: warning: argument 2 null where non-null expected [-Wnonnull]
570 | setenv("PREFIX", NULL, 1);
| ^~
In file included from src/main.h:1,
from src/main.c:1:
/usr/include/stdlib.h:792:12: note: in a call to function ‘setenv’ declared
‘nonnull’
792 | extern int setenv (const char *__name, const char *__value, int
__replace)
|^~
src/main.c:571:17: warning: argument 2 null where non-null expected [-Wnonnull]
571 | setenv("PREFIX_LEN", NULL, 1);
| ^~
/usr/include/stdlib.h:792:12: note: in a call to function ‘setenv’ declared
‘nonnull’
792 | extern int setenv (const char *__name, const char *__value, int
__replace)
|^~
src/main.c: In function ‘daemonize’:
src/main.c:844:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘umask’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
844 | umask(027);
| ^
src/main.c:874:12: error: implicit declaration of function ‘flock’; did you
mean ‘clock’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
874 | if(flock(pidfile, F_TLOCK, 0) < 0)
|^
|clock
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
from https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724118903/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-
armhf.ramond_0.5-4.2build2_BUILDING.txt.gz
** Affects: ramond (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: ramond (Debian)
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1066551
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066551
** Also affects: ramond (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066551
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061024
Title:
FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ramond/+bug/2061024/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061027] [NEW] FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
Public bug reported:
confy.c: In function ‘yyparse’:
confy.c:494:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘yylex’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
494 | # define YYLEX yylex ()
|^
confy.c:950:16: note: in expansion of macro ‘YYLEX’
950 | yychar = YYLEX;
|^
confy.c:1188:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘yyerror’; did you mean
‘yyerrok’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
1188 | yyerror ("syntax error");
| ^~~
| yyerrok
confy.y: At top level:
confy.y:58:1: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
58 | yyerror(char *s)
| ^~~
tcpxtract.c: In function ‘main’:
tcpxtract.c:312:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘yyparse’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
312 | yyparse();
| ^~~
[...]
confl.l: In function ‘yylex’:
confl.l:28:47: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strdup’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
28 | [0-9]+ {yylval.string =
strdup(yytext); return NUMBER;}
| ^~
from https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724118034/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-
armhf.tcpxtract_1.0.1-17build2_BUILDING.txt.gz
** Affects: tcpxtract (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: tcpxtract (Debian)
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1066484
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066484
** Also affects: tcpxtract (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066484
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061027
Title:
FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tcpxtract/+bug/2061027/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061027] Re: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
For yyparse function, upstream patch is: https://sourceforge.net/p/tcpxtract/patches/6/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061027 Title: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tcpxtract/+bug/2061027/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061028] [NEW] FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
Public bug reported:
vncconnect.c:17:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘exit’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
17 | exit(1);
| ^~~~
vncconnect.c:8:1: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of ‘exit’
7 | #include
+++ |+#include
8 |
vncconnect.c:17:5: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in
function ‘exit’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
17 | exit(1);
| ^~~~
vncconnect.c:17:5: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of ‘exit’
vncconnect.c: In function ‘main’:
vncconnect.c:51:9: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in
function ‘exit’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
51 | exit(1);
| ^~~~
vncconnect.c:51:9: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of ‘exit’
vncconnect.c:58:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strlen’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
58 | strlen(argv[i]));
| ^~
vncconnect.c:8:1: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of
‘strlen’
7 | #include
+++ |+#include
8 |
vncconnect.c:58:21: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in
function ‘strlen’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
58 | strlen(argv[i]));
| ^~
vncconnect.c:58:21: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of
‘strlen’
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
[...]
vncauth.c:60:13: error: implicit declaration of function
‘vncEncryptAndStorePasswd2’; did you mean ‘vncEncryptAndStorePasswd’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
60 | return (vncEncryptAndStorePasswd2(passwd, NULL, fname) == 0);
| ^
| vncEncryptAndStorePasswd
vncauth.c: In function ‘vncDecryptPasswdFromFile’:
vncauth.c:131:13: error: implicit declaration of function
‘vncDecryptPasswdFromFile2’; did you mean ‘vncDecryptPasswdFromFile’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
131 | if (vncDecryptPasswdFromFile2(fname, passwd, NULL) == 0) {
| ^
| vncDecryptPasswdFromFile
vncauth.c: In function ‘vncRandomBytes’:
vncauth.c:211:28: error: implicit declaration of function ‘time’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
211 | seed = (unsigned int)time(0) ^ (unsigned int)getpid();
|^~~~
from https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724118029/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-
armhf.tightvnc_1%3A1.3.10-7build2_BUILDING.txt.gz
** Affects: tightvnc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: tightvnc (Debian)
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1066337
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066337
** Also affects: tightvnc (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066337
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061028
Title:
FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tightvnc/+bug/2061028/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061030] [NEW] FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
Public bug reported: /<>/src/misc.c: In function ‘slrn_verror’: /<>/src/misc.c:376:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘VA_COPY’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 376 |VA_COPY(ap1, ap); |^~~ from https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724118840/buildlog_ubuntu-noble- armhf.slrn_1.0.3+dfsg-6build2_BUILDING.txt.gz ** Affects: slrn (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: slrn (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1066213 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066213 ** Also affects: slrn (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066213 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061030 Title: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/slrn/+bug/2061030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061030] Re: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
Upstream's fix for this: https://github.com/jedsoft/slrn/pull/1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061030 Title: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/slrn/+bug/2061030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061030] Re: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
** Changed in: slrn (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) ** Changed in: slrn (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061030 Title: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/slrn/+bug/2061030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061033] [NEW] FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
Public bug reported:
sn_generation.c:66:1: error: implicit declaration of function ‘input_field’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
66 | input_field(msg,NULL,0);
| ^~~
sn_generation.c:67:1: error: implicit declaration of function ‘forced_refresh’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
67 | forced_refresh();
| ^~
sn_generation.c: In function ‘sp_fix_IP_packet’:
sn_generation.c:205:22: error: implicit declaration of function ‘in_cksum’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
205 | sp_help_ip->checksum=in_cksum((unsigned short *) (sp->buffer),
| ^~~~
sn_interface.c: In function ‘mask_status’:
sn_interface.c:195:3: warning: assignment to ‘unsigned char *’ from
incompatible pointer type ‘_32_bit *’ {aka ‘unsigned int *’}
[-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
195 | ad=&(mask->source_ip);
| ^
sn_interface.c:201:3: warning: assignment to ‘unsigned char *’ from
incompatible pointer type ‘_32_bit *’ {aka ‘unsigned int *’}
[-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
201 | ad=&(mask->destination_ip);
| ^
sn_cfgfile.c: In function ‘clean_string’:
sn_cfgfile.c:131:14: error: implicit declaration of function ‘isalnum’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
131 | if( (isalnum(string[i]))||(string[i]=='.') )
| ^~~
sn_cfgfile.c:17:1: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of
‘isalnum’
16 | #include "sniffit.h"
+++ |+#include
17 | /* #include "sn_generation.h" */
sn_cfgfile.c: In function ‘clean_filename’:
sn_cfgfile.c:155:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘iscntrl’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
155 | if( !(iscntrl(string[i])) && !(isspace(string[i])) )
| ^~~
sn_cfgfile.c:155:15: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of
‘iscntrl’
sn_cfgfile.c:155:40: error: implicit declaration of function ‘isspace’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
155 | if( !(iscntrl(string[i])) && !(isspace(string[i])) )
|^~~
sn_cfgfile.c:155:40: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of
‘isspace’
sn_interface.c: In function ‘interaction’:
sn_interface.c:470:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘isprint’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
470 | isprint(*(connection_data+i))?
| ^~~
from https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724117947/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-
armhf.sniffit_0.5-3build2_BUILDING.txt.gz
** Affects: sniffit (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: sniffit (Debian)
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1066536
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066536
** Also affects: sniffit (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066536
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061033
Title:
FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sniffit/+bug/2061033/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061038] [NEW] FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
Public bug reported: y.tab.c:2666:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'yyerror'; did you mean 'yyerrok'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] rcparse.y: In function 'newBitmap': rcparse.y:737:9: warning: ignoring return value of 'fread' declared with attribute 'warn_unused_result' [-Wunused-result] 737 | fread(bitmap->data + (bitmap->height - 1 - y) * width_in_bytes, | ^~~ 738 | 1, width_in_bytes, f); | ~ [...] linux/SDL_sysjoystick.c:525:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘SDL_PrivateJoystickHat’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 525 | SDL_PrivateJoystickHat(stick, hat, | ^~ linux/SDL_sysjoystick.c: In function ‘JS_HandleEvents’: linux/SDL_sysjoystick.c:567:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘SDL_PrivateJoystickAxis’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 567 | SDL_PrivateJoystickAxis(joystick, | ^~~ linux/SDL_sysjoystick.c:598:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘SDL_PrivateJoystickButton’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 598 | SDL_PrivateJoystickButton(joystick, | ^ linux/SDL_sysjoystick.c: In function ‘SDL_SYS_JoystickUpdate’: linux/SDL_sysjoystick.c:717:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘SDL_PrivateJoystickBall’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 717 | SDL_PrivateJoystickBall(joystick, (Uint8)i, xrel, yrel); | ^~~ from https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724118904/buildlog_ubuntu-noble- armhf.whitedune_0.30.10-2.2build4_BUILDING.txt.gz ** Affects: whitedune (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: whitedune (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1067618 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067618 ** Also affects: whitedune (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067618 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061038 Title: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whitedune/+bug/2061038/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061038] Re: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
Upstream's repo might be the one with this issue https://github.com/mufti11/white_dune/issues/3# . Repo in the control file doesn't exist. There is also https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whitedune/+bug/1828832 for upgrading to a major and supposed continued version, but Debian is not there yet. ** Bug watch added: github.com/mufti11/white_dune/issues #3 https://github.com/mufti11/white_dune/issues/3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061038 Title: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whitedune/+bug/2061038/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061039] [NEW] FTBFS on armhf (implicit-function-declaration) and riscv64 (error: expected ‘)’ before ‘CPUINFO’ )
Public bug reported:
For armhf [1]:
/<>/src/tools/adcclient.c:178:33: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘ADC_client_connect_internal’; did you mean ‘ADC_client_connect’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
178 | ADC_client_connect_internal(client);
| ^~~
| ADC_client_connect
For riscv64 [2]:
/<>/src/core/commands.c:395:86: error: expected ‘)’ before
‘CPUINFO’
395 | buf = cbuf_create_const("Powered by " PRODUCT_STRING "
on " OPSYS "/" CPUINFO);
|~
^~~~
|
[...]
/<>/src/core/commands.c:395:86: error: expected ‘)’ before
‘CPUINFO’
395 | buf = cbuf_create_const("Powered by " PRODUCT_STRING "
on " OPSYS "/" CPUINFO);
|~
^~~~
|
[1]
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724118191/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-armhf.uhub_0.4.1-3.2build2_BUILDING.txt.gz
[2]
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724118080/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-riscv64.uhub_0.4.1-3.2build2_BUILDING.txt.gz
** Affects: uhub (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061039
Title:
FTBFS on armhf (implicit-function-declaration) and riscv64 (error:
expected ‘)’ before ‘CPUINFO’ )
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uhub/+bug/2061039/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2040463] Re: MRE updates of dpdk in the 24.04 cycle
Jammy proposed internal tests passed OK: ubuntu@node-horsea:~/dpdk-testing$ cat dpdk-test.status PHYS_TESTPMD VIRT_SPAWNGUESTS VIRT_TESTPMD VIRT_L2FWD BENCH_OVS VUC_BENCH_OVSDPDK VUC_ENDURANCE_STARTSTOP VUC_ENDURANCE_ADDREMOVEPORT 1.0.0 (20:30:52): phys (BM) tests 1.1.0 (20:30:52): initialize environment 1.1.1 (20:34:18): testpmd => Pass 1.1.2 (20:35:35): check testpmd output => Pass 2.0.0 (20:35:35): prep virtual test environment 1.0.0 (20:38:46): virt tests 1.1.0 (20:38:46): initialize environment 3.0.0 (20:39:34): performance tests 3.1.0 (20:39:34): prep benchmarks 3.2.0 (20:40:58): performance tests 3.2.1 (20:41:06): test guest-openvswitch for OVS-5CPU => Pass 3.2.2 (21:00:31): test guest-dpdk-vhost-user-client-multiq for OVSDPDK-VUC => Pass 4.0.0 (21:20:13): VUC endurance checks 4.1.0 (21:20:13): prep VUC endurance tests 4.1.1 (21:34:44): start stop guests (client) => Pass 4.1.2 (22:39:04): add/remove ports (client) => Pass 4.2.0 (22:48:37): Final cleanup ubuntu@node-horsea:~/dpdk-testing$ dpkg -l dpdk Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Architecture Description +++-==--- ii dpdk 21.11.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 amd64Data Plane Development Kit (runtime) ** Attachment added: "output.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2040463/+attachment/5763983/+files/output.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040463 Title: MRE updates of dpdk in the 24.04 cycle To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2040463/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2040463] Re: MRE updates of dpdk in the 24.04 cycle
On Jammy, testing upgrading path, removing : All OK. (Installation was tested with the internal tests). ## Upgrading #Installing previous version: root@Mdpdk:~# apt install dpdk [...] root@Jdpdk:~# dpkg -l dpdk | grep ii ii dpdk 21.11.4-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 amd64Data Plane Development Kit (runtime) #Upgrading root@Jdpdk:~# apt list --upgradable | grep dpdk dpdk/jammy-proposed 21.11.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 amd64 [upgradable from: 21.11.4-0ubuntu0.22.04.1] root@Jdpdk:~# apt upgrade dpdk root@Jdpdk:~# apt upgrade dpdk Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following packages will be upgraded: apparmor dpdk initramfs-tools initramfs-tools-bin initramfs-tools-core landscape-common libapparmor1 libgcrypt20 libicu70 librte-bus-auxiliary22 librte-bus-pci22 librte-bus-vdev22 librte-bus-vmbus22 librte-common-mlx5-22 librte-cryptodev22 librte-eal22 librte-ethdev22 librte-gso22 librte-hash22 librte-ip-frag22 librte-kni22 librte-kvargs22 librte-mbuf22 librte-mempool-ring22 librte-mempool22 librte-meter22 librte-net-af-packet22 librte-net-bond22 librte-net-e1000-22 librte-net-fm10k22 librte-net-i40e22 librte-net-ixgbe22 librte-net-kni22 librte-net-mlx4-22 librte-net-mlx5-22 librte-net-netvsc22 librte-net-pcap22 librte-net-tap22 librte-net-thunderx22 librte-net-vdev-netvsc22 librte-net-vhost22 librte-net-virtio22 librte-net-vmxnet3-22 librte-net22 librte-pci22 librte-rcu22 librte-ring22 librte-sched22 librte-security22 librte-telemetry22 librte-vhost22 libxmlb2 openssh-client openssh-server openssh-sftp-server ubuntu-advantage-tools ubuntu-minimal ubuntu-pro-client ubuntu-pro-client-l10n ubuntu-server ubuntu-standard 61 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 15.8 MB of archives. After this operation, 59.4 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] root@Jdpdk:~# apt-cache policy dpdk dpdk: Installed: 21.11.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 Candidate: 21.11.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 Version table: *** 21.11.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 21.11.4-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/main amd64 Packages 21.11.2-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 500 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-security/main amd64 Packages 21.11-1build1 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages #Removing after upgrade root@Jdpdk:~# apt remove --purge dpdk Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: ibverbs-providers libfdt1 libibverbs1 libnl-route-3-200 librte-bus-auxiliary22 librte-bus-pci22 librte-bus-vdev22 librte-bus-vmbus22 librte-common-mlx5-22 librte-cryptodev22 librte-eal22 librte-ethdev22 librte-gso22 librte-hash22 librte-ip-frag22 librte-kni22 librte-kvargs22 librte-mbuf22 librte-mempool-ring22 librte-mempool22 librte-meter22 librte-net-af-packet22 librte-net-bond22 librte-net-e1000-22 librte-net-fm10k22 librte-net-i40e22 librte-net-ixgbe22 librte-net-kni22 librte-net-mlx4-22 librte-net-mlx5-22 librte-net-netvsc22 librte-net-pcap22 librte-net-tap22 librte-net-thunderx22 librte-net-vdev-netvsc22 librte-net-vhost22 librte-net-virtio22 librte-net-vmxnet3-22 librte-net22 librte-pci22 librte-rcu22 librte-ring22 librte-sched22 librte-security22 librte-telemetry22 librte-vhost22 python3-pyelftools rdma-core Use 'apt autoremove' to remove them. The following packages will be REMOVED: dpdk* 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded. After this operation, 133 kB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] (Reading database ... 79253 files and directories currently installed.) Removing dpdk (21.11.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1) ... (Reading database ... 79242 files and directories currently installed.) Purging configuration files for dpdk (21.11.6-0ubuntu0.22.04.1) ... ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040463 Title: MRE updates of dpdk in the 24.04 cycle To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/2040463/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061370] [NEW] FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
Public bug reported: gram.c: In function ‘yyparse’: gram.c:1531:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘yylex’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 1531 | yychar = yylex (); |^ gram.y: In function ‘readin_config’: gram.y:957:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘yyset_in’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 957 | yyset_in(in); | ^~~~ gram.y:965:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘yylex_destroy’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 965 | yylex_destroy(); | ^ from Buildlog armhf [1]. Upstream's fix is at [2]. [1] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724114432/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-armhf.radvd_1%3A2.19-1build1_BUILDING.txt.gz [2] https://github.com/radvd-project/radvd/pull/196/commits ** Affects: radvd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: radvd (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags: ftbfs ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1066224 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066224 ** Also affects: radvd (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066224 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061370 Title: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/radvd/+bug/2061370/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2023971] Re: [MIR] libmail-dmarc-perl
Version of spamassassin using dmarc has been uploaded to [1] . I'm
opening a FFe for spamassassin for this.
Using the libmail-dmarc-perl package that has been ack to be MIRed that
is at [2], we can confirm the installation of both and the packages to
finally be promoted (that coincides with the summary at the beginning of
the description):
#1 Checking smapassassin and libmail-dmarc-perl version to be installed
if we do am 'apt install spamassassin' in Noble with the spamassassin
package in PPA for FFe.
root@Ndmarc-final:~# apt-cache policy libmail-dmarc-perl
libmail-dmarc-perl:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1.20230215-1ubuntu1~mirespace10
Version table:
1.20230215-1ubuntu1~mirespace10 500
500
https://ppa.launchpadcontent.net/mirespace/libmail-dmarc-perl-suggested/ubuntu
noble/main amd64 Packages
1.20230215-1 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/universe amd64 Packages
root@Ndmarc-final:~# apt-cache policy spamassassin
spamassassin:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 4.0.0-8ubuntu5
Version table:
4.0.0-8ubuntu5 500
500
https://ppa.launchpadcontent.net/mirespace/spamassassin-dmarc-mir/ubuntu
noble/main amd64 Packages
4.0.0-8ubuntu4 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/main amd64 Packages
#2 Checking packages in universe for this, to get the list to be
promoted finally:
root@Ndmarc-final:~# for p in $(apt install -s spamassassin | grep Inst
| cut -d' ' -f2); do echo -n ${p} && echo -n " " && apt-cache policy
${p} | grep archive.ubuntu | cut -d'/' -f5 | cut -d' ' -f1 ; done |
grep universe
WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in
scripts.
libclass-inspector-perl universe
libemail-simple-perl universe
libfile-sharedir-perl universe
libnet-ip-perl universe
libregexp-common-perl universe
libmail-dmarc-perl universe
[1] https://launchpad.net/~mirespace/+archive/ubuntu/spamassassin-dmarc-mir
[2]
https://launchpad.net/~mirespace/+archive/ubuntu/libmail-dmarc-perl-suggested
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023971
Title:
[MIR] libmail-dmarc-perl
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmail-dmarc-perl/+bug/2023971/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061379] [NEW] [FFe] [24.04 FEAT] Allow dmarc features on spamassassin
Public bug reported: Feature Freeze Exception (FFe): --- To avoid a component mismatched issue, libmail-dmarc-perl was demoted to Suggested from Recommends in spamassassin version 4.0.0-7ubuntu1 on mantic. A MIR process has been carried out to promote libmail-dmarc-perl to main (LP:2023971), which has been ack recently. I reproduce the rationale we gave there: tldr; DMARC support in SpamAssassin is important for stronger spam filtering. Spam email is an ever-present and ever-evolving presence in our online lives, and SpamAssassin is a key tool for end users and service providers to identify likely spam for filtering. SpamAssassin 4.0, introduced in Ubuntu "lunar" 22.10, introduced a number of major new features including three new plugins, the most significant of which is the DMARC policy checker. DMARC (or "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance" https://dmarc.org/) is a new convention for email service providers to communicate to email recipient programs about how to handle authentication failures. It builds on prior protocols (namely, SPF and DKIM) to address their limitations. Essentially, DMARC protects against direct domain spoofing, such that when an email purports to be from a given domain (say, @gmail.com or @irs.gov) but fails proper authentication using the authentication methods published by that domain, it tells the email receiver whether to reject the email as spam, quarantine it for evaluation, or something else. DMARC also establishes a way for the email receiver to give feedback back to the sender about emails that failed to pass this check. libmail-dmarc-perl contains the official Perl implementation of DMARC support. SpamAssassin is the primary user of this package The new package should not break any other packages that depend on it. In the MIR bug for dmarc, the use of this feature with spamassassin has been tested [1] and dep-8 tests has been added to libmail-dmarc-perl too. Installation of the spamassassin package with dmarc to be promoted has been tested at [2]. The 'ubuntu-release' team could finally be subscribed to allow the promotion. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmail-dmarc-perl/+bug/2023971/comments/26 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmail-dmarc-perl/+bug/2023971/comments/29 - Move back libmail-dmarc-perl as a Recommends dependency from Suggested. ** Affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061379 Title: [FFe] [24.04 FEAT] Allow dmarc features on spamassassin To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+bug/2061379/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061379] Re: [FFe] [24.04 FEAT] Allow dmarc features on spamassassin
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+git/spamassassin/+merge/464206 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061379 Title: [FFe] [24.04 FEAT] Allow dmarc features on spamassassin To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+bug/2061379/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061370] Re: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
** Changed in: radvd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) ** Changed in: radvd (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061370 Title: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/radvd/+bug/2061370/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061370] Re: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/radvd/+git/radvd/+merge/464328 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061370 Title: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/radvd/+bug/2061370/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061379] Re: [FFe] [24.04 FEAT] Allow dmarc features on spamassassin
** Tags added: ubuntu-release -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061379 Title: [FFe] [24.04 FEAT] Allow dmarc features on spamassassin To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+bug/2061379/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2023971] Re: [MIR] libmail-dmarc-perl
FFe granted at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+bug/2061379/comments/1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023971 Title: [MIR] libmail-dmarc-perl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmail-dmarc-perl/+bug/2023971/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061833] Re: FTBFS on armfh - error: #error ANSI C compiler without void or unsigned char or prototypes
Fixed on Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066434#10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061833 Title: FTBFS on armfh - error: #error ANSI C compiler without void or unsigned char or prototypes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uucp/+bug/2061833/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061833] [NEW] FTBFS on armfh - error: #error ANSI C compiler without void or unsigned char or prototypes
Public bug reported: The relevant portion of the build log for armhf [1] is : make[4]: Entering directory '/<>/lib' gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -I.. -I./.. -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fno-stack-clash-protection -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=/usr/src/uucp-1.07-28build1 -Wall -g -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -O2 -MT buffer.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/buffer.Tpo -c -o buffer.o buffer.c In file included from buffer.c:25: ../uucp.h:103:3: error: #error ANSI C compiler withou-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCEt void or unsigned char or prototypes 103 | #error ANSI C compiler without void or unsigned char or prototypes | ^ make[4]: *** [Makefile:355: buffer.o] Error 1 Previous successful build [2] for the same architecture has the following compiler command line: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I.. -I./.. -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g -O2 -ffile- prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fdebug-prefix- map=/<>=/usr/src/uucp-1.07-28 -Wall -g -Wl,-Bsymbolic- functions -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2 -MT buffer.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/buffer.Tpo -c -o buffer.o buffer.c So new flags added in current attempt to build are: -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -fno-stack-clash-protection [1] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724114099/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-armhf.uucp_1.07-28build1_BUILDING.txt.gz [2] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/694347390/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-armhf.uucp_1.07-28_BUILDING.txt.gz ** Affects: uucp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: uucp (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags: ftbfs ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1066434 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066434 ** Also affects: uucp (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066434 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061833 Title: FTBFS on armfh - error: #error ANSI C compiler without void or unsigned char or prototypes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uucp/+bug/2061833/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061833] Re: FTBFS on armfh - error: #error ANSI C compiler without void or unsigned char or prototypes
** Changed in: uucp (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061833 Title: [FFe] FTBFS on armfh - error: #error ANSI C compiler without void or unsigned char or prototypes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uucp/+bug/2061833/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061833] Re: [FFe] FTBFS on armfh - error: #error ANSI C compiler without void or unsigned char or prototypes
** Summary changed: - FTBFS on armfh - error: #error ANSI C compiler without void or unsigned char or prototypes + [FFe] FTBFS on armfh - error: #error ANSI C compiler without void or unsigned char or prototypes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061833 Title: [FFe] FTBFS on armfh - error: #error ANSI C compiler without void or unsigned char or prototypes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uucp/+bug/2061833/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061833] Re: [FFe] FTBFS on armfh - error: #error ANSI C compiler without void or unsigned char or prototypes
** Description changed: + Feature Freeze Exception (FFe): + --- + + This ftbfs for this package on main has been fixed on Debian and new + version is in the publishing history of the package at + https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/uucp/1.07-29 + + I downloaded the source from Debian and I made a rebuild on a ppa: + + https://launchpad.net/~mirespace/+archive/ubuntu/fixing-general-noble- + packages/+sourcepub/15971907/+listing-archive-extra + + The new package should not break any other packages that depend on it. + Please, allow the sync. + + --- The relevant portion of the build log for armhf [1] is : make[4]: Entering directory '/<>/lib' gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -I.. -I./.. -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fno-stack-clash-protection -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=/usr/src/uucp-1.07-28build1 -Wall -g -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -O2 -MT buffer.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/buffer.Tpo -c -o buffer.o buffer.c In file included from buffer.c:25: ../uucp.h:103:3: error: #error ANSI C compiler withou-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCEt void or unsigned char or prototypes - 103 | #error ANSI C compiler without void or unsigned char or prototypes - | ^ + 103 | #error ANSI C compiler without void or unsigned char or prototypes + | ^ make[4]: *** [Makefile:355: buffer.o] Error 1 Previous successful build [2] for the same architecture has the following compiler command line: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I.. -I./.. -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g -O2 -ffile- prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fdebug-prefix- map=/<>=/usr/src/uucp-1.07-28 -Wall -g -Wl,-Bsymbolic- functions -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2 -MT buffer.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/buffer.Tpo -c -o buffer.o buffer.c So new flags added in current attempt to build are: -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -fno-stack-clash-protection [1] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724114099/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-armhf.uucp_1.07-28build1_BUILDING.txt.gz [2] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/694347390/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-armhf.uucp_1.07-28_BUILDING.txt.gz ** Tags added: ubuntu-release ** Description changed: Feature Freeze Exception (FFe): --- This ftbfs for this package on main has been fixed on Debian and new version is in the publishing history of the package at https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/uucp/1.07-29 - I downloaded the source from Debian and I made a rebuild on a ppa: + I downloaded the source from Debian and I made a rebuild on a ppa to + check the build itself on our infra: https://launchpad.net/~mirespace/+archive/ubuntu/fixing-general-noble- packages/+sourcepub/15971907/+listing-archive-extra The new package should not break any other packages that depend on it. Please, allow the sync. --- The relevant portion of the build log for armhf [1] is : make[4]: Entering directory '/<>/lib' gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -I.. -I./.. -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fno-stack-clash-protection -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=/usr/src/uucp-1.07-28build1 -Wall -g -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -O2 -MT buffer.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/buffer.Tpo -c -o buffer.o buffer.c In file included from buffer.c:25: ../uucp.h:103:3: error: #error ANSI C compiler withou-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCEt void or unsigned char or prototypes 103 | #error ANSI C compiler without void or unsigned char or prototypes | ^ make[4]: *** [Makefile:355: buffer.o] Error 1 Previous successful build [2] for the same architecture has the following compiler command line: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I.. -I./.. -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g -O2 -ffile- prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fdebug-prefix- map=/<>=/usr/src/uucp-1.07-28 -Wall -g -Wl,-Bsymbolic- functions -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now
[Bug 2068021] Re: MRE updates of walinuxagent 2.11.1.4 into N/J/F
Ubuntu 23.10 (mantic) reached end-of-life on July 11, 2024, therefore
marking Mantic's task as "Won't fix".
** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Also affects: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Miriam España Acebal (mirespace)
** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068021
Title:
MRE updates of walinuxagent 2.11.1.4 into N/J/F
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/2068021/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1800499] Re: walinuxagent unit tests failing on build
** Also affects: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) ** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1800499 Title: walinuxagent unit tests failing on build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1800499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063046] Re: build-depends on obsolete python3-nose-timer
I'm also targeting Jammy because we have there python 3.10.12 and, due to bug 1800499, to make the test work, we can move to pytest following upstream's direction for this (comment #3). ** Also affects: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063046 Title: build-depends on obsolete python3-nose-timer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/2063046/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1800499] Re: walinuxagent unit tests failing on build
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+git/walinuxagent/+merge/469956 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1800499 Title: walinuxagent unit tests failing on build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1800499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068021] Re: MRE updates of walinuxagent 2.11.1.4 into N/J/F
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+git/walinuxagent/+merge/469956 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068021 Title: MRE updates of walinuxagent 2.11.1.4 into N/J/F To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/2068021/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1800499] Re: walinuxagent unit tests failing on build
** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) ** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1800499 Title: walinuxagent unit tests failing on build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1800499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068021] Re: MRE updates of walinuxagent 2.11.1.4 into N/J/F
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+git/walinuxagent/+merge/470169 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068021 Title: MRE updates of walinuxagent 2.11.1.4 into N/J/F To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/2068021/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2074525] Re: dh_sphinxdoc fails to parse search.html generated file
I'm submitting a fix for the regex expression in Salsa. ** Changed in: sphinx (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074525 Title: dh_sphinxdoc fails to parse search.html generated file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/sphinx/+bug/2074525/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2074525] [NEW] dh_sphinxdoc fails to parse search.html generated file
Public bug reported:
Since sphinx (7.3.7-1), when introduced the following change
+ * dh_sphinxdoc: Support loading searchindex.js with defer="defer"
implemented in this way:
diff -Nru sphinx-7.2.6/debian/dh-sphinxdoc/dh_sphinxdoc
sphinx-7.3.7/debian/dh-sphinxdoc/dh_sphinxdoc
--- sphinx-7.2.6/debian/dh-sphinxdoc/dh_sphinxdoc 2024-06-16
14:34:33.0 +
+++ sphinx-7.3.7/debian/dh-sphinxdoc/dh_sphinxdoc 2024-07-03
07:18:22.0 +
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@
}
}
defined $documentation_options or error("DOCUMENTATION_OPTIONS not found");
-my $loads_searchindex = $search =~ m{};
+my $loads_searchindex = $search =~ m{};
unless ($loads_searchindex)
{
# old style, used before Sphinx 2.0
if a generated search.html file has only defer when loading
searchindex.js, e. g.:
dh_sphinxdoc fails with:
dh_sphinxdoc: error: /search.html does not load
searchindex.js.
It has been seen in the mako package, preventing its build [1]
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/741379311/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular-
amd64.mako_1.3.5-1.1_BUILDING.txt.gz
** Affects: sphinx
Importance: Unknown
Status: New
** Affects: sphinx (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Miriam España Acebal (mirespace)
Status: New
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1059621
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059621
** Also affects: sphinx via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059621
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074525
Title:
dh_sphinxdoc fails to parse search.html generated file
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sphinx/+bug/2074525/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2074525] Re: dh_sphinxdoc fails to parse search.html generated file
Salsa MR at https://salsa.debian.org/python- team/packages/sphinx/-/merge_requests/5 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074525 Title: dh_sphinxdoc fails to parse search.html generated file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/sphinx/+bug/2074525/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2074552] [NEW] FTBFS mako 1.3.5-1.1: dh_sphinxdoc: error: search.html does not load searchindex.js
Public bug reported: This FTBFS is related to sphinx bug 2074525: dh_sphinxdoc: error: debian/python-mako-doc/usr/share/doc/python-mako- doc/html/search.html does not load searchindex.js as seen in build log [1]. [1] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/741379311/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular- amd64.mako_1.3.5-1.1_BUILDING.txt.gz ** Affects: mako Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: mako (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: update-excuse ** Tags added: update-excuse ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1076969 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076969 ** Also affects: mako via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076969 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074552 Title: FTBFS mako 1.3.5-1.1: dh_sphinxdoc: error: search.html does not load searchindex.js To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mako/+bug/2074552/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2075152] [NEW] Tests failing with python3-jsonschema < 4.19.2-3ubuntu1
Public bug reported: In last log [1] from autopkgtests, we can see things like the following: 126s validator = cls(schema, registry=self.registry) 126s ^^^ 126s TypeError: create..Validator.__init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'registry' Tests were also run in build time, so I was guessing why they were passing there [2]. Doing a rebuild in ppa [3], the build failed in the same way it did for the tests. The reason is different versions of python3-jsonschema: 4.19.2-3ubuntu1 (good case) versus (4.10.3-2ubuntu1). The needed version of python3-jsonschema which is in -proposed presents a component-mistmached issue, that is known [4], plus regression tests on dt-schema. [1] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular/oracular/arm64/p/pystac/20240730_103114_1b7f1@/log.gz [2] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/738850508/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular-amd64.pystac_1.10.1-1_BUILDING.txt.gz [3] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/741549692/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular-amd64.pystac_1.10.1-1build1_BUILDING.txt.gz [4] https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/07/16/%23ubuntu-meeting.html ** Affects: pystac (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075152 Title: Tests failing with python3-jsonschema < 4.19.2-3ubuntu1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pystac/+bug/2075152/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2075550] Re: FTBFS on armhf with GCC-14 (rebuild against mpi-defaults 1.17)
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/form/+git/form/+merge/470565 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075550 Title: FTBFS on armhf with GCC-14 (rebuild against mpi-defaults 1.17) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abinit/+bug/2075550/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2075722] [NEW] Missing tests (build-time tests and DEP-8)
Public bug reported: This package includes a ruby-based test suite as can be seen in /check/README.md, but it is disabled by now. I gave it a try with no luck (maybe that's why they are skipped in Debian): Finished in 122.186977495 seconds. --- 244 tests, 247 assertions, 215 failures, 0 errors, 19 pendings, 0 omissions, 0 notifications 11.8852% passed --- 2.00 tests/s, 2.02 assertions/s FAIL: check-help.sh FORM 5.0 (Aug 1 2024) 0.05 form units in 4.537 seconds (cpu time) corresponding to 42.31 form units per hour PASS: benchmark-fu.sh == 1 of 2 tests failed ** Affects: form (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: needs-dep8 ** Tags added: needs-dep8 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075722 Title: Missing tests (build-time tests and DEP-8) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/form/+bug/2075722/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071468] Re: ELF package metadata failure: environment variable ‘DEB_HOST_ARCH’ not defined
** Also affects: gcl27 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071468 Title: ELF package metadata failure: environment variable ‘DEB_HOST_ARCH’ not defined To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asymptote/+bug/2071468/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2075550] Re: FTBFS on armhf with GCC-14 (rebuild against mpi-defaults 1.17)
Uploading debdiff for review... thanks! ** Attachment added: "form_4.3.1+git20240409+ds-2_4.3.1+git20240409+ds-2ubuntu1.diff.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/form/+bug/2075550/+attachment/5802181/+files/form_4.3.1+git20240409+ds-2_4.3.1+git20240409+ds-2ubuntu1.diff.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075550 Title: FTBFS on armhf with GCC-14 (rebuild against mpi-defaults 1.17) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abinit/+bug/2075550/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071468] Re: ELF package metadata failure: environment variable ‘DEB_HOST_ARCH’ not defined
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/gcl27/+git/gcl27/+merge/470568 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071468 Title: ELF package metadata failure: environment variable ‘DEB_HOST_ARCH’ not defined To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asymptote/+bug/2071468/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071941] Re: New tests added last version are failing
** Changed in: r-cran-bayestestr (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => New ** Changed in: r-cran-bayestestr (Ubuntu) Assignee: Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071941 Title: New tests added last version are failing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/r-cran-bayestestr/+bug/2071941/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2076092] [NEW] FTBFS with undefined reference to `__wrap_malloc'
Public bug reported: This is failing on -proposed on all archs except armhf and s390x for the perfevent tests. The relevant part of the log [1] gcc -g -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=/usr/src/pcp-6.3.0-1 -I./src/include -I./src/include/pcp -DPCP_VERSION=\"6.3.0\" -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wshadow -Wno-array-bounds -Wall -O2 -g -I../src/include -I../src/include/pcp -DPCP_VERSION=\"6.3.0\" -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wshadow -Wno-array-bounds -Wall -O2 -g -I../../src/include -I../../src/include/pcp -DPCP_VERSION=\"6.3.0\" -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wshadow -Wno-array-bounds -I../../src/pmdas/perfevent -DFILESYSTEM_ROOT='"./fakefs/"' -Wall -O2 -g -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -Wl,-z,relro -specs=/usr/share/dpkg/elf-package-metadata.specs -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -Wl,-z,relro -specs=/usr/share/dpkg/elf-package-metadata.specs -Wall -L./src/libpcp/src -L./src/libpcp_web/src -L./src/libpcp_pmda/src -L./src/libpcp_mmv/src -L./src/libpcp_archive/src -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -Wl,-z,relro -specs=/usr/share/dpkg/elf-package-metadata.specs -Wall -L../src/libpcp/src -L../src/libpcp_web/src -L../src/libpcp_pmda/src -L../src/libpcp_mmv/src -L../src/libpcp_archive/src -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -Wl,-z,relro -specs=/usr/share/dpkg/elf-package-metadata.specs -Wall -L../../src/libpcp/src -L../../src/libpcp_web/src -L../../src/libpcp_pmda/src -L../../src/libpcp_mmv/src -L../../src/libpcp_archive/src -Wl,--wrap,syscall -Wl,--wrap,ioctl -Wl,--wrap,read -Wl,--wrap,close -Wl,--wrap,malloc -Wl,--wrap,calloc -Wl,--wrap,sysconf -L../../src/libpcp/src -L../../src/libpcp_web/src -L../../src/libpcp_pmda/src -L../../src/libpcp_mmv/src -L../../src/libpcp_archive/src -o perfevent_test target/perf_event_test.o target/architecture.o target/mock_pfm.o target/rapl-interface.o target/configparser.yytest.o target/perfinterface.o target/parse_events.o -lpcp -lm /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccjaNNSs.ltrans0.ltrans.o: in function `retrieve_numainfo': /usr/src/pcp-6.3.0-1/qa/perfevent/../../src/pmdas/perfevent/architecture.c:171:(.text+0x8e5): undefined reference to `__wrap_malloc' /usr/bin/ld: /usr/src/pcp-6.3.0-1/qa/perfevent/../../src/pmdas/perfevent/architecture.c:33:(.text+0x9db): undefined reference to `__wrap_malloc' /usr/bin/ld: /usr/src/pcp-6.3.0-1/qa/perfevent/../../src/pmdas/perfevent/architecture.c:165:(.text+0xa5e): undefined reference to `__wrap_malloc' /usr/bin/ld: /usr/src/pcp-6.3.0-1/qa/perfevent/../../src/pmdas/perfevent/architecture.c:33:(.text+0xa77): undefined reference to `__wrap_malloc' /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccjaNNSs.ltrans0.ltrans.o: in function `retrieve_cpuinfo': /usr/src/pcp-6.3.0-1/qa/perfevent/../../src/pmdas/perfevent/architecture.c:33:(.text+0xb7c): undefined reference to `__wrap_malloc' /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccjaNNSs.ltrans0.ltrans.o:/usr/src/pcp-6.3.0-1/qa/perfevent/../../src/pmdas/perfevent/architecture.c:33: more undefined references to `__wrap_malloc' follow /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccjaNNSs.ltrans0.ltrans.o: in function `parse_sysfs_perf_event_scale': /usr/src/pcp-6.3.0-1/qa/perfevent/../../src/pmdas/perfevent/perfinterface.c:315:(.text+0x199d): undefined reference to `__wrap_calloc' /usr/bin/ld: /usr/src/pcp-6.3.0-1/qa/perfevent/../../src/pmdas/perfevent/perfinterface.c:328:(.text+0x1a51): undefined reference to `__wrap_calloc' /usr/bin/ld: /usr/src/pcp-6.3.0-1/qa/perfevent/../../src/pmdas/perfevent/perfinterface.c:254:(.text+0x1aba): undefined reference to `__wrap_calloc' /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccjaNNSs.ltrans0.ltrans.o:/usr/src/pcp-6.3.0-1/qa/perfevent/../../src/pmdas/perfevent/perfinterface.c:261:(.text+0x1afa): undefined reference to `__wrap_calloc' /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccjaNNSs.ltrans0.ltrans.o: in function `parse_sysfs_perf_event_scale': /usr/src/pcp-6.3.0-1/qa/perfevent/../../src/pmdas/perfevent/perfinterface.c:209:(.text+0x1bd2): undefined reference to `__wrap_calloc' /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccjaNNSs.ltrans0.ltrans.o:/usr/src/pcp-6.3.0-1/qa/perfevent/../../src/pmdas/perfevent/perfinterface.c:277: more undefined references to `__wrap_calloc' follow /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccjaNNSs.ltrans0.ltrans.o: in function `perf_get': /usr/src/pcp-6.3.0-1/qa/perfevent/../../src/pmdas/perfevent/perfinterface.c:1145:(.text+0x3f2f): undefined reference to `__wrap_malloc' /usr/bin/ld: /usr/src/pcp-6.3.0-1/qa/perfevent/../../src/pmdas/perfevent/perfinterface.c:1052:(.text+0x446f): undefined reference to `__wrap_calloc' /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccjaNNSs.ltrans0.ltrans.o:/usr/src/pcp-6.3.0-1/qa/perfevent/../../src/pmdas/perfevent/perfinterface.c:1070:(.text+0x4534): undefined reference to `__wrap_calloc' /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccjaNNSs.ltrans0.ltrans.o:/usr
[Bug 2076095] [NEW] Tests failing with python 3.12
Public bug reported:
When pysignal trigger magicgui, we found regressions for all archs. The
relevant part of the failures are (from [1]):
pybuild-autopkgtest
269s I: pybuild base:311: cd /tmp/autopkgtest.RWhG6j/autopkgtest_tmp/build;
python3.12 -m pytest tests
270s = test session starts
==
270s platform linux -- Python 3.12.4, pytest-7.4.4, pluggy-1.5.0
270s PyQt5 5.15.11 -- Qt runtime 5.15.13 -- Qt compiled 5.15.13
270s rootdir: /tmp/autopkgtest.RWhG6j/autopkgtest_tmp/build
270s configfile: pyproject.toml
270s plugins: qt-4.3.1, xvfb-3.0.0
270s collected 313 items / 3 skipped
270s
270s tests/test_application.py . [
0%]
270s tests/test_backends.py s.[
3%]
270s tests/test_container.py .. [
7%]
270s tests/test_docs.py ss. [
8%]
270s tests/test_factory.py .. [
12%]
270s tests/test_gui_class.py F.FFF[
13%]
271s tests/test_magicgui.py ...x. [
29%]
271s [
29%]
272s tests/test_persistence.py ...[
30%]
272s tests/test_signature.py [
31%]
272s tests/test_table.py sss. [
44%]
272s tests/test_types.py ... [
49%]
272s tests/test_ui_field.py ..ssss. [
52%]
273s tests/test_widgets.py ..s.s..ss..s.ss..ss.sss.s..s.s..s. [
68%]
275s s...s..s [
91%]
275s ..
[100%]
275s
275s === FAILURES
===
275s test_guiclass
_
275s
275s def test_guiclass():
275s """Test that the guiclass decorator works as expected."""
275s mock = Mock()
275s
275s @guiclass
275s class Foo:
275s a: int = 1
275s b: str = "bar"
275s
275s @button
275s def func(self):
275s mock(asdict(self))
275s
275s # example recommended for type checking
275s if TYPE_CHECKING:
275s gui: ClassVar[Container]
275s events: ClassVar[psygnal.SignalGroup]
275s
275s foo = Foo()
275s
275s assert foo.a == 1
275s assert foo.b == "bar"
275s
275s > assert isinstance(foo.gui, Container)
275s
275s tests/test_gui_class.py:43:
275s _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _
275s /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/magicgui/schema/_guiclass.py:233: in __get__
275s bind_gui_to_instance(wdg, instance)
275s /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/magicgui/schema/_guiclass.py:274: in
bind_gui_to_instance
275s widget.changed.connect_setattr(
275s _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _
275s
275s self = , name='a')>
275s obj = test_guiclass..Foo(a=1, b='bar'), attr = 'a'
275s maxargs =
275s
275s def connect_setattr(
275s self,
275s obj: object,
275s attr: str,
275s maxargs: int | None | object = _NULL,
275s *,
275s on_ref_error: RefErrorChoice = "warn",
275s priority: int = 0,
275s ) -> WeakCallback[None]:
275s """Bind an object attribute to the emitted value of this signal.
275s
275s Equivalent to calling `self.connect(functools.partial(setattr,
obj, attr))`,
275s but with additional weakref safety (i.e. a strong reference to
`obj` will not
275s be retained). The return object can be used to
275s [`disconnect()`][psygnal.SignalInstance.disconnect], (or you can
use
275s
[`disconnect_setattr()`][psygnal.SignalInstance.disconnect_setattr]).
275s
275s Parameters
275s --
275s obj : object
275s An object.
275s attr : str
275s The name of an attribute on `obj` that should be set to the
value of this
275s signal when emitted.
275s maxargs : Optional[int]
275s max number of positional args to accept
275s on_ref_error: {'raise', 'warn', 'ignore'}, optional
275s What to do if a weak reference cannot be created. If 'raise',
a
275s ReferenceError will be raised. If 'warn' (default), a warning
will be
275s issued and a strong-reference will be used. If 'ignore' a
strong-refer
[Bug 2061865] [NEW] [FFe] [24.04 FEAT] Upload libmail-dmarc-perl
Public bug reported: Feature Freeze Exception (FFe): --- I completely forgot to fill this counterpart of LP:2061379. A MIR process has been carried out to promote libmail-dmarc-perl to main (LP:2023971), which has been ack recently by MIR Team [3] and by Security Team [4]. I reproduce the rationale we gave there: tldr; DMARC support in SpamAssassin is important for stronger spam filtering. Spam email is an ever-present and ever-evolving presence in our online lives, and SpamAssassin is a key tool for end users and service providers to identify likely spam for filtering. SpamAssassin 4.0, introduced in Ubuntu "lunar" 22.10, introduced a number of major new features including three new plugins, the most significant of which is the DMARC policy checker. DMARC (or "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance" https://dmarc.org/) is a new convention for email service providers to communicate to email recipient programs about how to handle authentication failures. It builds on prior protocols (namely, SPF and DKIM) to address their limitations. Essentially, DMARC protects against direct domain spoofing, such that when an email purports to be from a given domain (say, @gmail.com or @irs.gov) but fails proper authentication using the authentication methods published by that domain, it tells the email receiver whether to reject the email as spam, quarantine it for evaluation, or something else. DMARC also establishes a way for the email receiver to give feedback back to the sender about emails that failed to pass this check. libmail-dmarc-perl contains the official Perl implementation of DMARC support. SpamAssassin is the primary user of this package The new package should not break any other packages that depend on it. In the MIR bug for dmarc, the use of this feature with spamassassin has been tested [1] and dep-8 tests has been added to libmail-dmarc-perl too. Installation of the spamassassin package with dmarc to be promoted has been tested at [2]. Final review before the upload is taking place for polishment purposes (usual things like changelog, maintainer and commit ordering or squashing...I will ink the MP). The 'ubuntu-release' team could finally be subscribed to allow the promotion. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmail-dmarc-perl/+bug/2023971/comments/26 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmail-dmarc-perl/+bug/2023971/comments/29 [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmail-dmarc-perl/+bug/2023971/comments/18 [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmail-dmarc-perl/+bug/2023971/comments/24 - Please, allow the upload of the libmail-dmarc-perl package proposed here to be promoted to main following the MIR process ( it needs to be seen in the component mismatches graph before promotion). ** Affects: libmail-dmarc-perl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: ubuntu-release ** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/libmail-dmarc-perl/+git/libmail-dmarc-perl/+merge/464196 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061865 Title: [FFe] [24.04 FEAT] Upload libmail-dmarc-perl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmail-dmarc-perl/+bug/2061865/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061865] Re: [FFe] [24.04 FEAT] Upload libmail-dmarc-perl
Yes to all your questions Paride, thanks for your help on this! The MP corresponds to the package uploaded at https://launchpad.net/~mirespace/+archive/ubuntu/libmail-dmarc-perl- suggested I double checked in [1] that this package installs the packages in universe that were finally considered to be part of the MIR with the spamassassin package from LP:2061379 : libclass-inspector-perl universe libemail-simple-perl universe libfile-sharedir-perl universe libnet-ip-perl universe libregexp-common-perl universe libmail-dmarc-perl universe [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmail-dmarc-perl/+bug/2023971/comments/29 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061865 Title: [FFe] [24.04 FEAT] Upload libmail-dmarc-perl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmail-dmarc-perl/+bug/2061865/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061966] [NEW] FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’
Public bug reported: lib/compat.c:154:16: error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’ 154 | return gettimeofday(tv); |^~~~ In file included from /usr/include/features.h:502, from /usr/include/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bits/libc-header-start.h:33, from /usr/include/stdio.h:28, from ./rsync.h:318, from lib/compat.c:22: /usr/include/arm-linux-gnueabihf/sys/time.h:71:12: note: declared here 71 | extern int __REDIRECT_NTH (gettimeofday, (struct timeval *__restrict __tv, |^~ lib/compat.c:156:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] 156 | } | ^ from armhf buildlog [1] [1] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724113685/buildlog_ubuntu-noble- armhf.backuppc-rsync_3.1.3.0-3build2_BUILDING.txt.gz ** Affects: backuppc-rsync (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) Status: In Progress ** Affects: backuppc-rsync (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags: ftbfs ** Changed in: backuppc-rsync (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061966 Title: FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc-rsync/+bug/2061966/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061966] Re: FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1066438 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066438 ** Also affects: backuppc-rsync (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066438 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061966 Title: FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc-rsync/+bug/2061966/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061966] Re: FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’
** Changed in: backuppc-rsync (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => New ** Changed in: backuppc-rsync (Ubuntu) Assignee: Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061966 Title: FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc-rsync/+bug/2061966/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061991] [NEW] FTBFS - FAIL: TestTimezoneAmericasCompileFileAndParse
Public bug reported:
In a recent rebuild on the server team, amd64 arm64 ppc64el s390x arch
builds were failing due to:
2024/04/16 20:54:12 E! [] Error parsing foobar to timestamp: strconv.ParseInt:
parsing "foobar": invalid syntax
2024/04/16 20:54:12 E! [] Error parsing foobar to int: strconv.ParseInt:
parsing "foobar": invalid syntax
2024/04/16 20:54:12 E! [] Error parsing timestamp [foobar], could not find any
suitable time layouts.
2024/04/16 20:54:12 D! [] Grok no match found for: "1.25 200 192.168.1.1
5.432µs"
2024/04/16 20:54:12 D! [] Grok no match found for: "[04/Jun/2016:12:41:45
+0100] notnumber 200 192.168.1.1 5.432µs 101"
2024/04/16 20:54:12 E! [] Error parsing notnumber to int: strconv.ParseInt:
parsing "notnumber": invalid syntax
2024/04/16 20:54:12 E! [] Error parsing notnumber to float: strconv.ParseFloat:
parsing "notnumber": invalid syntax
2024/04/16 20:54:12 E! [] Error parsing notnumber to duration: time: invalid
duration "notnumber"
2024/04/16 20:54:12 E! [] Error parsing notnumber to duration: time: invalid
duration "notnumber"
2024/04/16 20:54:12 W! [] Improper timezone supplied (Something/Weird), setting
loc to UTC
--- FAIL: TestTimezoneAmericasCompileFileAndParse (0.01s)
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[recovered]
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x50 pc=0x6b2066]
goroutine 82 [running]:
testing.tRunner.func1.2({0x6f49a0, 0x9ba620})
/usr/lib/go-1.22/src/testing/testing.go:1631 +0x24a
testing.tRunner.func1()
/usr/lib/go-1.22/src/testing/testing.go:1634 +0x377
panic({0x6f49a0?, 0x9ba620?})
/usr/lib/go-1.22/src/runtime/panic.go:770 +0x132
github.com/influxdata/telegraf/plugins/parsers/grok.(*Parser).Compile(0xc00013fe70)
/<>/plugins/parsers/grok/parser.go:184 +0x8a6
github.com/influxdata/telegraf/plugins/parsers/grok.TestTimezoneAmericasCompileFileAndParse(0xc000456820)
/<>/plugins/parsers/grok/parser_test.go:911 +0x10a
testing.tRunner(0xc000456820, 0x7722a0)
/usr/lib/go-1.22/src/testing/testing.go:1689 +0xfb
created by testing.(*T).Run in goroutine 1
A debugging session shows that the improper timezone supplied is
error(*errors.errorString) *{s: "unknown time zone Canada/Eastern"}
From
grok.(*Parser).Compile
(/media/miriam/extension/Code/packages/telegraf/telegraf-
gu/plugins/parsers/grok/parser.go:182)
it tries to load /usr/share/zoneinfo//Canada/Eastern which doesn't exist
, via time.LoadLocation -> loadTzinfo -> loadTzinfoFromDirOrZip
That file exists in tzdata-legacy package:
root@Ntzdata:~# apt-file search Canada/Eastern
Finding relevant cache files to search
tzdata-legacy: /usr/share/zoneinfo/Canada/Eastern
tzdata-legacy: /usr/share/zoneinfo/right/Canada/Eastern
It might be possible that we need to add tzdata-legacy as a dependency
** Affects: telegraf (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Miriam España Acebal (mirespace)
Status: In Progress
** Tags: ftbfs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061991
Title:
FTBFS - FAIL: TestTimezoneAmericasCompileFileAndParse
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/telegraf/+bug/2061991/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061991] Re: FTBFS - FAIL: TestTimezoneAmericasCompileFileAndParse
** Changed in: telegraf (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) ** Changed in: telegraf (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061991 Title: FTBFS - FAIL: TestTimezoneAmericasCompileFileAndParse To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/telegraf/+bug/2061991/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061966] Re: FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’
** Changed in: backuppc-rsync (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) ** Changed in: backuppc-rsync (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061966 Title: FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc-rsync/+bug/2061966/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061966] Re: FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’
I found a promising fix upstream for "update autoconfig files": https://github.com/backuppc/rsync- bpc/commit/ce3ce3061c2acc4c78693953d6a1a2cf50145fe2#diff-49473dca262eeab3b4a43002adb08b4db31020d190caaad1594b47f1d5daa810L855 with a lot of changes of "main" by "int main(void)" as can be seen i.e. at: https://github.com/backuppc/rsync- bpc/commit/ce3ce3061c2acc4c78693953d6a1a2cf50145fe2#diff-49473dca262eeab3b4a43002adb08b4db31020d190caaad1594b47f1d5daa810L878 and with a later commit for one more missing: https://github.com/backuppc/rsync-bpc/pull/34/files The first commit is big: checking if all the changes are needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061966 Title: FTBFS on armfh - error: too few arguments to function ‘gettimeofday’ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc-rsync/+bug/2061966/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2042356] Re: [SRU] wminput crashes with ImportError: ... undefined symbol: PyVarObject_CallFunction
Hi Sudip! I reviewed the patch, and I have a few questions: - The patch seems to be one of the commits of the MR accepted on Debian on 976439 (the last one in fact). Would the commit a7ac2dbdc122115b5603f595c56cc55a6f09dca3 "Also add libwiicd patches. " be needed? - The patch is for commit https://salsa.debian.org/georgesk/cwiid/-/blob/e7cebe40c94b05e97f07302c36e93f60482b0ae5/debian/patches/python3-build-azzra, but is not completely imported: - Makefile.in is not imported in the patch (maybe is this related to the commit a7ac2db (the one I pointed to in the previous question?) Why are some parts of the original commit (change comments, e.g.) not imported into the patch? Could you give us more information about this elections? I build the package with the patch (it builds OK) and I didn't test yet -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042356 Title: [SRU] wminput crashes with ImportError: ... undefined symbol: PyVarObject_CallFunction To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cwiid/+bug/2042356/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847377] Re: snmptrapd.service uses MIBSDIR instead of MIBDIRS
** Tags added: bitesize -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847377 Title: snmptrapd.service uses MIBSDIR instead of MIBDIRS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/1847377/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946910] Re: Merge vlan from Debian unstable for 22.04
** Changed in: vlan (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946910 Title: Merge vlan from Debian unstable for 22.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlan/+bug/1946910/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946875] Re: Merge mysql-defaults from Debian unstable for 22.04
** Changed in: mysql-defaults (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946875 Title: Merge mysql-defaults from Debian unstable for 22.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-defaults/+bug/1946875/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946841] Re: Merge amavisd-new from Debian unstable for 22.04
** Changed in: amavisd-new (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946841 Title: Merge amavisd-new from Debian unstable for 22.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amavisd-new/+bug/1946841/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1505670] Re: python exceptions bleeding into stdout
** Changed in: squid-deb-proxy (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: squid-deb-proxy (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: squid-deb-proxy (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1505670 Title: python exceptions bleeding into stdout To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid-deb-proxy/+bug/1505670/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
