[Bug 236247] [NEW] HUAWEI ETS1000 CDMA modem doesn't work anymore in 8.04
Public bug reported:
I have HUAWEI ETS1000 CDMA modem [1] and it was working just fine on
i386 7.10 after I followed instructions how to create custom udev rule
[2]. After Ubuntu upgrade to 8.04 those instructions doesn't help
anymore and no /dev/ttyUSB* device is created for modem.
Unfortunately this modem is far, far away and as it's only way to
internet from there, thus I can't post various ls*/dmesg stuff, but I
double checked, that idVendor and idProduct numbers reported by lsusb
match those listed in [2] and - more important - they where working in
previous Ubuntu release :(
1. http://www.huawei.com/mobileweb/en/products/view.do?id=320&pageId=null
2. http://blog.mohanjith.net/2007/06/installing-huawei-ets1000-on-linux.html
For record (if [2] goes down).
Udev rule:
#TI USB 3410
SUBSYSTEM=="usb_device" ACTION=="add"
SYSFS{idVendor}=="0451",SYSFS{idProduct}=="3410" \
SYSFS{bNumConfigurations}=="2" \
SYSFS{bConfigurationValue}=="1" \
RUN+="/bin/sh -c 'echo 2 > /sys%p/device/bConfigurationValue'"
dmesg messages after plugging in USB device:
ti_usb_3410_5052 1-1:1.0: TI USB 3410 1 port adapter converter detected
ti_usb_3410_5052: probe of 1-1:1.0 failed with error -5
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
HUAWEI ETS1000 CDMA modem doesn't work anymore in 8.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236247
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 236247] Re: HUAWEI ETS1000 CDMA modem doesn't work anymore in 8.04
I made some tests with that usb to serial converter and modem.
First - I connected to my Gentoo laptop (udev-122, 2.6.25-gentoo-r1) and I got
same error message in dmesg as in Ubuntu 8.04. I added new udev rule, replugged
device and it started to work in Gentoo. Conclusion - issue is not only Ubuntu
specific and it's fixable.
For reference - the new udev rule, that worked on my Gentoo box (2.6.15
kernel): SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ATTR{idVendor}=="0451", ATTR{idProduct}=="3410",
RUN+="/bin/sh -c 'echo 2 > /sys%p/bConfigurationValue'"
As next step I used same udev rule on Ubuntu 8.04 but without any luck - for
some reason it doesn't work in Ubuntu.
More info from Ubuntu 8.04 box (lsmod, udevinfo and udevtest in attachment):
dmesg:
[ 473.753611] usb 2-1: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 3
[ 473.987653] usb 2-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
[ 473.993599] ti_usb_3410_5052: probe of 2-1:1.0 failed with error -5
uname -a:
Linux zakis 2.6.24-17-generic #1 SMP Thu May 1 14:31:33 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux
# This part is strange, as on Gentoo I can freely change that /sys%p value with
"echo 2 >"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# echo 2 > /sys/bus/usb/devices/usb2/2-1/bConfigurationValue
-su: echo: write error: Invalid argument
# As You can see, previous command was not successfull and also udev rule has
failed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /sys/bus/usb/devices/usb2/2-1/bConfigurationValue
1
** Attachment added: "udevinfo, udevtest and lsmod output"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14969527/huawei_debug_info
--
HUAWEI ETS1000 CDMA modem doesn't work anymore in 8.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236247
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 58456] Qt 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 contain bug in file open dialog code
Public bug reported: This bug affects any Qt 4 using app with file open dialog. It is fixed in Qt 4.1.3 More info: http://www.trolltech.com/developer/task- tracker/index_html?method=entry&id=106783 ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Qt 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 contain bug in file open dialog code https://launchpad.net/bugs/58456 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 58456] Qt 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 contain bug in file open dialog code
Public bug reported: This bug affects any Qt 4 using app with file open dialog. It is fixed in Qt 4.1.3 More info: http://www.trolltech.com/developer/task- tracker/index_html?method=entry&id=106783 ** Affects: qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Qt 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 contain bug in file open dialog code https://launchpad.net/bugs/58456 -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 42049] Re: no direct rendering on dapper with i810 chipset (855GM)
Try out intel driver (xserver-xorg-video-intel). I had same problem in Dapper, moved to Edgy and had to use VESA driver till I found intel driver. Now I have DRI. Unfortunately it give me only additional 100 FPS in glxgears (now up to 600), but it's better than nothing :) Warning - I also experienced hard-lockups. Also You can not switch to console. i855GM on Dell Latitude D505 -- no direct rendering on dapper with i810 chipset (855GM) https://launchpad.net/bugs/42049 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61234] Re: 640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper
I switched from i810 driver to intel (xserver-xorg-video-intel 1.6.0-0ubuntu1) driver and got my 1024x768 back with xv, DRI and AIGLX. Altrough intel driver has some issues: DRI is slooow (max 600fps in glxgears, max 500fps w/o DRI = +100fps only); I can not switch to console (consoles content is in upper grabbled 2 cm of screen); fn key to switch between LFP and VGA out doesn't work; TV-out also doesn't work (have not tested with i810); some hard-lockups on high load. But still is better than VESA :) -- 640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper https://launchpad.net/bugs/61234 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61234] 640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-i810 In Dapper my i855gm card where working out of box (no DRI, but correct resolution, xv, output to VGA out port). After upgrade to Edgy, I manage to get only 640x480 + garbage in upper 2cm of screen. Disabling AIGLX, DRI, GLX doesn't help (only changes distortion look). 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device (rev 02) 00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation 82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device (rev 02) ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-i810 (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- 640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper https://launchpad.net/bugs/61234 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61234] Re: 640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper
sudo 915resolution -l Intel 800/900 Series VBIOS Hack : version 0.5.2 Chipset: 855GM BIOS: TYPE 1 Mode Table Offset: $C + $29f Mode Table Entries: 39 Mode 30 : 640x480, 8 bits/pixel Mode 32 : 800x600, 8 bits/pixel Mode 34 : 1024x768, 8 bits/pixel Mode 38 : 1280x1024, 8 bits/pixel Mode 3a : 1600x1200, 8 bits/pixel Mode 3c : 1920x1440, 8 bits/pixel Mode 41 : 640x480, 16 bits/pixel Mode 43 : 800x600, 16 bits/pixel Mode 45 : 1024x768, 16 bits/pixel Mode 49 : 1280x1024, 16 bits/pixel Mode 4b : 1600x1200, 16 bits/pixel Mode 4d : 1920x1440, 16 bits/pixel Mode 50 : 640x480, 32 bits/pixel Mode 52 : 800x600, 32 bits/pixel Mode 54 : 1024x768, 32 bits/pixel Mode 58 : 1280x1024, 32 bits/pixel Mode 5a : 1600x1200, 32 bits/pixel Mode 5c : 1920x1440, 32 bits/pixel ** Attachment added: "Xorg.log with DRI enabled" http://librarian.launchpad.net/4311132/xorg.dri.log -- 640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper https://launchpad.net/bugs/61234 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61234] Re: 640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper
uname -a Linux GRASS 2.6.17-7-generic #2 SMP Wed Sep 6 17:56:40 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux ** Attachment added: "Xorg.conf" http://librarian.launchpad.net/4311135/xorg.conf -- 640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper https://launchpad.net/bugs/61234 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61234] Re: 640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper
Sorry, correct resolution is 1024x768 and I get it out of box in Dapper - without any 915resolution tricks. -- 640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper https://launchpad.net/bugs/61234 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61234] Re: 640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper
At attached image is seen screen when DRI is disabled (edgy's X.org with i810 driver). ** Attachment added: "Broken screen on i855gm w i180 driver" http://librarian.launchpad.net/4311679/i810_xorg_7.1_bug.JPG -- 640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper https://launchpad.net/bugs/61234 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61494] Wrong desktop file entry for subversion
Public bug reported: Error message translated from Latvian: "Desktop file /usr/share/apps/konqueror/servicemenus/kdesvn_subversion.desktop contains wrong entry Exportto." ** Affects: mplayer (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Wrong desktop file entry for subversion https://launchpad.net/bugs/61494 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63788] Wrong fonts for boot screen in Edgy
Public bug reported: Kubuntu edgy beta1 and knot3 both offer national language choice for boot loader in live version. Unfortunately used font does not contain all required glyphs for Latvian language. Result - texts have empty spaces instead of non-latin glyphs. Some glyphs are present and are shown correctly. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Wrong fonts for boot screen in Edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/63788 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63807] Serial mouse not detected in Edgy
Public bug reported: No serial mouse is detected on Kubuntu Edgy beta 1 leaving Xorg without mouse. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Serial mouse not detected in Edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/63807 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 70700] qt4-designer package does not create menu entry
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: qt4-designer In Kubuntu I have no menu entry for qt4-designer installed with package qt4-designer-4.2.0-1ubuntu6 ** Affects: qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- qt4-designer package does not create menu entry https://launchpad.net/bugs/70700 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182102] logout screen kde no text
Public bug reported: KDE logout screen has only four buttons and "cancel" button. No other text is present. It's hard to guess which of the buttons/icons what does without any hints, tooltips etc. Distro: Kubuntu feisty KDE version: 3.5.6 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- logout screen kde no text https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182102 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182102] Re: logout screen kde no text
** Attachment added: "A screenshot with problem" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11302328/logout_bug.png -- logout screen kde no text https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182102 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132837] Re: [apport] ubiquity crashed with PartmanOptionError in must_find_one_script() when creating first partition "Do Not Use"
Same here on AMD64 box. Will have to use some comandline tools to partition drive :| -- [apport] ubiquity crashed with PartmanOptionError in must_find_one_script() when creating first partition "Do Not Use" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132837 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 175666] Re: Firefox is unable to play flash movie
Same here on fresh 32bit 7.10. I installed flashplugin-nonfree via Synaptics, still Firefox complains about missing flash plugin and offers to install it. When I try to install via Firefox, it says, that I have it already installed, still it shows, that plugin is missing. -- Firefox is unable to play flash movie https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175666 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61494] Re: Wrong desktop file entry for subversion
It has nothing to do with mplayer. This bug was assigned to mplayer by this beautiful and user frendly bugzilla system. -- Wrong desktop file entry for subversion https://launchpad.net/bugs/61494 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61471] Re: Hardware acceleration broken for Intel 855GM graphics
This is same bug as Bug #61234. One of both bugs should be marked as duplicate. -- Hardware acceleration broken for Intel 855GM graphics https://launchpad.net/bugs/61471 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61234] Re: 640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper
This is equivalent with Bug #61471. Is possible to merge those bugs? -- 640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper https://launchpad.net/bugs/61234 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847902] [NEW] pam_nologin should optionally exclude users of the "wheel" group from its access restrictions
Public bug reported: During a remote system upgrade (18.04 to 19.04) something went south and after reboot the machine is stuck at some place in its boot sequence. SSH works, but trying to log-in with a sudo-capable user results in: "System is booting up. Unprivileged users are not permitted to log in yet. Please come back later. For technical details, see pam_nologin(8)." As Ubuntu has moved away from full root users with passwords + allowing root logins over SSH, I'm totally locked out from my remote system. There is a bug reported for pam_nologin requesting to provide separate exclusion mechanism but in the meantime it is possible to implement a workaround to exclude administrative users from nologin restriction. Here's the bug: https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues/42 And here is the workaround that should be implemented in Ubuntu: https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues/42#issuecomment-367450193 ** Affects: pam (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847902 Title: pam_nologin should optionally exclude users of the "wheel" group from its access restrictions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1847902/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1650634] Re: when installing systemd, it creates /run/nologin preventing all users from logging in.
Graham, you could be hit by a different bug. (In my case it was fubared NFS mount from fstab – turns out NFS mounts should be removed from fstab before upgrades) You are interested in solving "pam_nologin should allow sudoers to log in" – it is bug #1847902 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1650634 Title: when installing systemd, it creates /run/nologin preventing all users from logging in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1650634/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1850358] [NEW] Add missing return value in liblas.hpp
Public bug reported: Missing return statement in include/liblas/liblas.hpp causes calls to Open to always fail if liblas is compiled without Boost. As liblas src/c_api.cpp does not handle Open failures (returning NULL instead of throwing an exception), it causes a segfault in any application calling LASReader_Create or LASReader_CreateWithHeader. The issue has been resolved upstream[1], but any new releases incorporating this patch seem to be unlikely[2]. 1. https://github.com/libLAS/libLAS/pull/168 2. https://github.com/libLAS/libLAS/issues/146 Gentoo bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/698846 ** Affects: liblas (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850358 Title: Add missing return value in liblas.hpp To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/liblas/+bug/1850358/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1473088] Re: network manager peap mschapv2 authentication stopped working
According to a RH bug description, the problem lies on the server side of connection. Quote: " wpa_supplicant 2.4 may trigger this where 2.3 would not, becuase 2.4 enables some new ciphers for use with TLSv1.2, and the server may have enabled DH only for those ciphers that are now enabled. The options are to either get your network admins to fix the DH key issue by using something > 768 bits, or to disable TLSv1.2 for now until they fix it." https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241930 Too short DH key issue affects many programs (google it - sendmail, postfix, mysql etc.) Currently only option seems to be to downgrade wpa_supplicant to 2.3 as it seems to work and wait till a) a failback mechanism will be implemented to use older (and insecure!) TLS or SSL if TLS 1.2 fails or b) all eduroam RADIUS servers will be upgraded (more like never). ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1241930 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241930 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1473088 Title: network manager peap mschapv2 authentication stopped working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/1473088/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862220]
It's 2012 and it's still not possible to launch mail application on 4.8.3 without reading bugzilla entries. Uh, well -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862220 Title: kmail fails to start after migration from natty to oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kdepim/+bug/862220/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 313452] Re: Jaunty, Karmic: when booting from one partition and installing to another, installer fails to unmount '/cdrom' this halts installation.
Just got hit by this issue when trying to reinstall Ubuntu 9.x from Dell DVD. As I was trying to explain how to do reinstall via phone, it turned out to complete failure :( -- Jaunty, Karmic: when booting from one partition and installing to another, installer fails to unmount '/cdrom' this halts installation. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313452 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201032] Re: DPI not set or incorrectly set to 96
It's not a bug - it's a FEATURE! See more: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23705 Since xorg 1.7 it lies about Your screens DPI (unless You use NVIDIA closed drivers). Because Microsoft Windows up to Vista defaulted to 96dpi, now also X servers default to 96dpi no mater what screen size You have. Lucky for You, You can't override this "feature" in Your xorg.conf file. Only option - get correct screen size settings in mm and add "xrandr --fbmm WxH" to Your .xsessionrc or set DisplaySize at Section "Monitor" in Your xorg.conf. Be ware, that xdpyinfo also lies about Your screen size! If You use nouveau driver, it reports correct screen size and DPI in xorg.log and then this information gets ignored. Check Your screen dimensions with plain' ol' ruler to find out correct screen size. Don't forget to inform Xorg dev's how You *love* this new feature! Correct settings for Dell Latitude E6500 with 1440*900 screen are: dimensions:1440x900 pixels (333x212 millimeters) resolution:110x108 dots per inch ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #23705 http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23705 -- DPI not set or incorrectly set to 96 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201032 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572943] Re: Regression over Karmic on detection of physical screen size and resolution
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 589485 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589485 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 589485 Ignores physical display size and calculates based on 96DPI * You can subscribe to bug 589485 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/589485/+subscribe -- Regression over Karmic on detection of physical screen size and resolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201032] Re: DPI not set or incorrectly set to 96
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 589485 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589485 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 589485 Ignores physical display size and calculates based on 96DPI * You can subscribe to bug 589485 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/589485/+subscribe -- DPI not set or incorrectly set to 96 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201032 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 80940] Re: ati radeon driver does not autodetect displaysize on Latitude D600, therefore uses wrong resolution
It seems that original issue is replaced with a new problem - #589485 Xorg ignores screen size and sets DPI to 96. Everyone, who's hit by 96DPI, please, move to #589485 and also add Your "mee too" to http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23705 as there are no plans to fix this issue because now it's a FEATURE! ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #23705 http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23705 -- ati radeon driver does not autodetect displaysize on Latitude D600, therefore uses wrong resolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80940 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
