[Bug 245103] [NEW] Won't select multiple selects

[JoseLVG]

Public bug reported:

A page containing a select with multiple selectable options won't work.

The options are selected by clicking on them but they are deselected as
soon as you click out of the select widget or do the submit. The result
is that NO options are ever selected when the form is submitted,
rendering the form useless.

This DOES NOT happen in Windows Firefox 3.0. I guess is not a Ubuntu bug
but a firefox-3-linux one, but could not find where to report to Mozilla
directly.

** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Won't select multiple selects
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245103
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 245103] Re: Won't select multiple selects

[JoseLVG]

I forgot.

I user Kubuntu 8.04.

-- 
Won't select multiple selects
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245103
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 245103] Re: Won't select multiple selects

[JoseLVG]

I meant I "use" Kubuntu 8.04.

-- 
Won't select multiple selects
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245103
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 245103] Re: Won't select multiple selects

[JoseLVG]

Confirmed. It does the same in an empty profile.

2008/7/3 Rui Boon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
> Ubuntu better. Could you please try to start firefox with a new profile
> by following the instructions on
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs (under 'Try with a new
> profile).
>
> Also, please answer these questions:
> Does this happens on all websites or only some of them? If so, could you
> gives us a link to it?
> Which Firefox extensions do you have installed?
>
> This will greatly aid us in tracking down your problem.
>
> ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
>   Status: New => Incomplete
>
> --
> Won't select multiple selects
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245103
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
Won't select multiple selects
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245103
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 245103] Re: Won't select multiple selects

[JoseLVG]

Hi,

Here are the steps:

1) Save this as *select.html*:

  



  
  

*
Español (es)
English (en)
Português (pt)

*



2) This is a multiple select input widget, you shuld be able to select all
languages, 2, 1 or none.

*EXPECTED RESULT:* Open *select.html* it with konqueror or Firefox 2 and you
will see the *correct/expected behavior; when you select one, two or three
options and click outside the select widget the options you selected remains
selected*. Note as well that 2 options (Español and English) are selected
when you load the page.

*RESULT:* Open it now with Firefox 3.0 to see the error; *you can select
multiple options as before but they get deselected as the form loses focus
(or you click outside)*. Note as well that the 2 options that should be
preselected when you load the form are NOT preselected.

This happens in a kubuntu 8.04:
$ uname -a
Linux TyS14LNX 2.6.24-19-generic #1 SMP Wed Jun 18 14:43:41 UTC 2008 i686
GNU/Linux

$ apt-cache policy firefox
firefox:
  Instalados: 3.0+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1
  Candidato: 3.0+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1
  Tabla de versión:
 *** 3.0+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy-updates/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages

Thanks for your quick responses,

Jose


2008/7/3 Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 11:20:32AM -, JoseLVG wrote:
> > Confirmed. It does the same in an empty profile.
> >
>
> I cannot reproduce this issue with the info provided.
>
> Can you please provide a simple step by step instruction to reproduce
> your issue, like:
>
> 1. I do this
> 2. I do that
> Expected Result: This is what i expect to happen
> Result: This is what happens
>
>
>  status incomplete
>
>  - Alexander
>
> --
> Won't select multiple selects
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245103
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
Won't select multiple selects
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245103
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 253246] [NEW] suspend not working in e512+nvidia 7600gt

[JoseLVG]

Public bug reported:

My ubuntu Hardy x86_64 can't suspend a Dell E521 with a NVidia 7600gt.

(I mention the NVidia card model because this card is not the ATI that
usually comes with a Dell E521 and I know that most suspend problems are
caused by ATI or NVidia drivers)

When I click on the suspend button the screen boes blank but the machine
never goes to sleep.

This is with the POST_VIDEO=false option at /etc/default/acpi-support
AND 
"NvAGP" "1"  in /etc/x11/xorg.conf

** Affects: linux-backports-modules-2.6.22 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
suspend not working in e512+nvidia 7600gt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253246
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 253246] Re: suspend not working in e512+nvidia 7600gt

[JoseLVG]

The NVidia 7600GT is a PCIe (not an AGP) card, maybe the "NvAGP" option
is not correct or needed?

-- 
suspend not working in e512+nvidia 7600gt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253246
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 245103] Re: Won't select multiple selects

[JoseLVG]

Good, I should have realised that.

Anyway I moved to Ubuntu (which does not have this problem once you force it
to use its themes instead of the kde inherited ones) myself.

Jose

2008/7/31 alastairb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> I have just discovered this bug - Kubuntu Hardy with a Firefox binary
> (3.01) direct from mozilla.org (the standard Kubuntu build of Firefox
> keeps freezing on me).  I went to the KDE Control Center -> Appearance
> &Themes -> GTK Styles and Fonts, and changed the settings from "Use my
> KDE style in GTK applications" to "Use another style" (which I set to
> QT). When I restarted Firefox the problem went away.
>
> --
> Won't select multiple selects
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245103
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
Won't select multiple selects
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245103
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 261391] [NEW] Network Manager unable to resume network after suspend

[JoseLVG]

Public bug reported:

My system is a Dell Optiplex GX270 connected to a wired 1Gbit network
thought the e1000 driver. I am using an up-to-date version of Ubuntu
Hardy.

I suspend to RAM but Network-Manager is unable to bring back the
network. At syslog it complains that "no dhcpoffers" were received but
if you open a terminal and do dhclient, the ip is obtained correctly.

Steps to reproduce on a Dell Optiplex GX270 with a e1000 driver with
Ubuntu Hardy:

1) Suspend the system.
2) Resume by pressing the power button.
3) Check the network (after typing the password to unblock your X session)

Expected result: 
The network should be working.

Result:
The network DOES NOT work.

BUT if you do a "sudo dhclient" in a terminal window the network becomes
ready SO Networkmanager IS NOT DOING IT IN THE PROPER WAY.

** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Network Manager unable to resume network after suspend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261391
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 261391] Re: Network Manager unable to resume network after suspend

[JoseLVG]

More on this...

Even "sudo /etc/init.d/network start" DOES NOT WORK!!!

After getting the IP you can drop it succesfully with "sudo
/etc/init.d/network stop" but IT WON'T you it back with "sudo
/etc/init.d/network start", you HAVE TO DO "sudo dhclient"

Why? Why does dhclient work and dhclient called from ifup DOES NOT? WHAT
IS THE DIFFERENCE?

dhclient is not good enough because I still have to set up some static
routes manually also, while network ifup will set these routes for me.

-- 
Network Manager unable to resume network after suspend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261391
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 261391] Re: Network Manager unable to resume network after suspend

[JoseLVG]

Found it!

Still do not know with dhclient works but network ifup does not but...

I found out that network manager was NOT really managing my eth0 device
due to my /etc/network/interfaces config. I changed it to:

auto lo
iface lo inet loopback

#iface eth0 inet dhcp
#auto eth0

So that NOW it NetworkManager will manage the interface.

The interface was UP by NetworkManager now BUT still have some problems because 
I need some custom config for my network:
1) Static routes
2) Domain searches (first rflabs.com and then rfranco.com)

For the time being I just added a couple of scripts at /etc/network/if-up.d/:
1) static-routes:
#!/bin/bash 
route add -net 192.168.199.0/24 gw 10.90.12.61 dev eth0

2) resolvfix:
#!/bin/bash
echo "" >> /etc/resolv.conf
echo "#resolvfix at /etc/network/if-up.d/resolv.fix" >> /etc/resolv.conf
echo "domain rfranco.com" >> /etc/resolv.conf
echo "search rflabs.com rfranco.com" >> /etc/resolv.conf

Is there a cleaner way to set this custom network settings?
Do the Gnome/Kde GUIs allow to do this? 
Are there plans for them to do it ever?

-- 
Network Manager unable to resume network after suspend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261391
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 261391] Re: Network Manager unable to resume network after suspend

[JoseLVG]

This was NOT a real bug on NetworkManager but a misconfiguration

** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
Network Manager unable to resume network after suspend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261391
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

[JoseLVG]

Did you test it over a jaunty or ibex?
If you did it on an jaunty, can it be tested on ibex? 
(I mean, you are recompliling the kernel anyway, can't the 2.6.28rc6 be 
compiled on Ibex?)

-- 
Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 
8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

[JoseLVG]

Great news!

One thing. I am not using an Ubuntu stock kernel but Array.org provided
one for and eee 901.

Does kcheck build a kernel from the configuration of the kernel you have (like 
array.org in my case)?
or does it do it from well-known distro kernel templates?
(Anyway I am giving it a try for sure!)

-- 
Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 
8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

[JoseLVG]

How do you install the 2.6.28 series kernel on ibex? 
Is there a repository or just download a vanilla kernel from kernel.org?

-- 
Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 
8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 136549] Re: Powertop make wrong suggest to add usbcore.autosuspend=1

[JoseLVG]

Then is broken again in Intrepid, at least in the eee kernel flavour.

(eee 901)

-- 
Powertop make wrong suggest to add usbcore.autosuspend=1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136549
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

[JoseLVG]

To Paolo Fidalgo:

Can you confirm your FPS and whether in Fedora 10 you have the rendering
problems (or not) shown in this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UT8x_PGRolU

-- 
Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 
8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

[JoseLVG]

Thanks for the Fedora 10 FPS info.

I'll start to research eeedora 10 (as I am a eee 901 user) and the ubuntu
guys don't seem to care a lot a bout this bug.

-- 
Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 
8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

[JoseLVG]

Correct me if I am wrong but...

Can you do GoogleEarth, Compiz, glxgears, or any 3D in general with the VESA 
mode?
I think you can't, so giving up 3D acceleration because of a crapy driver is 
not the solution (not for me at least)
I prefer to have compiz more or less working and low glxgears FPS while I 
investigate why Fedora 10 hasn't got this problems.

I downloaded Fedora 10 yesterday and plan to test the live CD soon on my
eee 901 (via a Unetbootin made USB), then I'll publish here my
impressions.

-- 
Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 
8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

[JoseLVG]

Great disappointment with Fedora 10 live:

- FPS of glxgears are just about the same or worse than in Ubuntu 8.10 (around 
350)
- Couldn't test googleearth because and permission error.
- Rendering errors when compiz is On.

-- 
Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 
8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

[JoseLVG]

Great disappointment with Fedora 10 live:

- FPS of glxgears are just about the same or worse than in Ubuntu 8.10 (around 
350)
- Couldn't test googleearth because and permission error.
- Rendering errors when compiz is On.

All this on a eee 901 (VGA Intel 945)

-- 
Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 
8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

[JoseLVG]

If the performance drop is due to the TTM/GEM migration then It seems
that there is NO solution to this for Intrepid as far as I could read on
the net.

(If someone has more information, please let us all know)

The GEM bits are going to the 2.6.28 kernel NOW, and they will be stable
when that kernel version become the stale one.

What I don't understand is...
WHY do they decided to drop TTM BEFORE GEM was working?

[Usually, you don't break things like this before having a decent
replacement. ]

-- 
Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 
8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

[JoseLVG]

The funny thing about this bug is that, at the end of the day, you are
better off using closed-source drivers from the 'evil' guys at NVidia
that with the open sourced intel ones.

-- 
Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 
8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

[JoseLVG]

Has anybody been able to test a GEM based intel driver? (I guess upgrading to a 
2.6.28 kernel)
If so, how good is its performance? 
Does it solve all the problems described here?

-- 
Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 
8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

[JoseLVG]

Kernel 2.6.28 is not stable yet in kernel.org:
http://www.kernel.org/

And I guess that Ubuntu 8.10 wiill only come with 2.6.27 kernels packages.
To test GEM I presume that one should compile some 2.6.28 on his/her own and
try it out. This is quite time consuming, specially guessing the correct
config settings for the kernel compilation. (Or is it there a tool to port
the ubuntu (or array.org for eees) kernel's config to version 2.6.28?)

Then you can download and install the latest unstable GEM drivers from intel
driver website:
http://intellinuxgraphics.org/download.html

Jose

2008/11/26 Biji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> has 2.6.28 released yet??
>
> --
> Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system,
> Ubuntu 8.10
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 
8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

[JoseLVG]

This is great!

Pre-Hardy (TTM?) 1500FPS

Ibex 500FPS (-1000FPS)

Jaunty 350FPS (-150FPS)

Great progression!!!

-- 
Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 
8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 253246] Re: suspend not working in e512+nvidia 7600gt

[JoseLVG]

Confirmed,
*Jaunty x86_64 with Nvidia driver 180 on a Dell E521+Nvidia 7600GT CANNOT
SUSPEND+RESUME*

In fact, I think it does not even finish the suspend command correctly,
because the power light does not start blinking and the CPU box makes still
a lot of noise. Pressing the power button does nothing, there is no a ttempt
to wake up. You end up pressing the off button to hard reset the machine.
This behaviour is exactly the same as with Intrepid and Hardy.

[It is so sad that still suspend is not supported in this not so new/not so
old machine. It is probably true that we, the linuxers are a bit
machochists.]

Jose

2009/5/6 Sergio Zanchetta 

> The 18 month support period for Gutsy Gibbon 7.10 has reached its end of
> life -
> http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-7.10-eol . As a result, we are closing
> the
> linux-backports-modules-2.6.22 task. It would be helpful if you could test
> the
> new Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 release and confirm if this issue remains -
> http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/904overview. If the issue
> still exists with the Jaunty
> release, please update this report by changing the Status of the "linux
> (Ubuntu)"
> task from "Incomplete" to "New". Thanks in advance.
>
> ** Changed in: linux-backports-modules-2.6.22 (Ubuntu)
>   Status: New => Won't Fix
>
> ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
>   Importance: Undecided
>   Status: New
>
> ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
>   Status: New => Incomplete
>
> --
> suspend not working in e512+nvidia 7600gt
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253246
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
suspend not working in e512+nvidia 7600gt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253246
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

[JoseLVG]

The problem with this is that you started testing glxgears because, for
instance, GoogleEarth started to crown when in the previous Linux version it
flyed (my case, good GE performance with Xandros on my eee and unsuable GE
on ubuntu 8.10).

You end up with some idea of the performance loss when they say that Ubuntu
7.04 could make glxgears achieve 1500FPS and now it done only 50FPS.

The question now is, how are we going to know if the performance of later
versions is enhanced or not if we don't measure it with the same tools? Does
anyone have numbers FPS on Tremulous or some other 3D intensive app as far
as Ubuntu 7.04 so we can compare with 9.04 (without the vblank sync thing
that makes numbers up)?

(The vblank sync that reduces Jaunty FPS might be a clever thing for normal
use and energy-wise, but is it not very useful when comparing different
driver versions for performance)

Jose

2009/1/28 Hans 

> I believe that in the past, Bryce has stated that 3D applications that
> report frame-rates will do.  Such as Tux Racer.  In order for this to be
> useful though, you have to be careful to capture your system
> configuration:  XXorg.0.log, glxinfo, xdpyinfo,, etc.
>
> Phoronix also has a test suite that does similar things.
>
> Hans
>
> --
> MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

[JoseLVG]

Last time I tested with last intel, X  and kernel 2.6.30 (rc7?) versions
available the results were poor and not stable.
Has anyone got it working fine? (no render errors and good fps on
googleearth and tux racer?)
Has anyone got it working fine on a eee 901?

Jose

2009/6/28 Bryce Harrington 

> I think we can close this one now.  The issue is largely resolved in
> Karmic, and the commentary on this bug seems to have degenerated past
> usefulness.  Other bug reports are tracking kernel patches and other
> fixes proposed for Jaunty.
>
>
> ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Karmic)
>   Status: In Progress => Fix Released
>
> --
> MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

[JoseLVG]

Jaunty results on a eee 901 with 'out-of-thebox' configuration.

*NO COMPIZ: glxgears 600fps+ NO rendering errors, GoogleEarth smooth (sun &
atmosphere off) ppracer 18fps

COMPIZ ON: glxgears 570fps + rendering erros when moving the window,
GoogleEarth less smooth (sun & atmosphere off) ppracer 18fps
*
In my particular case *(eee 901 Intel 965GME)* performance seems better for
Jaunty 9.04 than for Ibex 8.10 (for instance, I could not use GoogleEarth in
Ibex at all)

[How can I check whether my out of the box config is using EXA or UXA?]

Jose

-- 
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 294034] [NEW] GoogleEarth unusably-slow on eee 901

[JoseLVG]

Public bug reported:

I am a EEE 901 user with Ubuntu Intrepid Ibex (v8.10).

GoogleEarth was properly working on Xandros, but it goes horribly slow
in Ubuntu, and I don't know why.

I followed with NO LUCK these instructions (that I think are for a eee 701, a 
less powerfull machine):
http://wiki.eeeuser.com/howto:fixgoogleearthspeed
In my case...

1) I don't see the "drmWaitVBlank" errors neither before or after
applying the patch BUT the application is unusably slow both before and
after patching.

2) In my case there is NO atmosphere option in GoogleEarth configuration
to change from true to false, so I created it (to false) and I get the
feeling that it doesn't change anything (I think the atmosphere is there
still).

What can I do now? Any ideas?

** Affects: googleearth-package (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
GoogleEarth unusably-slow on eee 901
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294034
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 294034] Re: GoogleEarth unusably-slow on eee 901

[JoseLVG]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 294172 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294172

Can this be a X.org server 1.5 issue?

Does it happen to someone using a Ubuntu 8.04 instead of my 8.10?

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 294172
   GoogleEarth unusable, too slow on eee 901

-- 
GoogleEarth unusably-slow on eee 901
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294034
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 213776] Re: update-manager does not download all updates in "download but do not install" mode if interrupted

[JoseLVG]

How do you do "download but do not install" in the update-manager

Is there a command line switch?
I haven't found the GUI? 
Shouln't it be there?

-- 
update-manager does not download all updates in "download but do not install" 
mode if interrupted
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213776
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 294775] [NEW] Force gnome to open PDFs with acroread (or anyother BUT evince!)

[JoseLVG]

Public bug reported:

There seems there is no way to FORCE Gnome to open PDFs with other
application than evince.

I try to force using Acrobat Reader isntead of evince by changinf both:

/etc/gnome/defaults.list
AND
~/.local/share/applications/defaults.list

And the result is that some apps like thunderbird, chose Acrobat instead
of evince conrrectly but both the desktop (GNOME) and nautilus open the
PDF file ONLY with evince by default.

How can this be changed?

Tested on Ubuntu Intrepid Ibex 8.10

** Affects: meta-gnome2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Invalid

-- 
Force gnome to open PDFs with acroread (or anyother BUT evince!)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294775
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 245103] Re: Won't select multiple selects

[JoseLVG]

The bug is marked still as "incomplete".
Couldn't it be reproduced by my previous instructions?
What else more do you need to know about this bug?

-- 
Won't select multiple selects
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245103
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 245103] Re: Won't select multiple selects

[JoseLVG]

Easier reproduction steps:

1) To see the proper behaviour open this URL with konqueror or firefox
2:

http://www.htmlcodetutorial.com/forms/_SELECT_MULTIPLE.html

Select for instance "mushrooms" AND "peppers" AND "onions" and click
submit, you'll see you selected the 3 vegetables.

2) Now open the same URL with Firefox 3
(http://www.htmlcodetutorial.com/forms/_SELECT_MULTIPLE.html)

Select the same 3 vegetables or any other combination and click submit,
before the submit is executed the selections you made are deleted or
reseted and cleared.

It seems that the options are submitted in the end, but the selections
are visually deleted so the user might think they are unselected.

-- 
Won't select multiple selects
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245103
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 245103] Re: Won't select multiple selects

[JoseLVG]

This bug maybe only present at the ubuntu packaged version for KDE (with
KDE look & feel)

In the same machine a version downloaded from Firefox website DOES NOT
present this problem and selected items don't get unmarked.

It also seems that checkboxes don't get grey when they get the focus in
this Firefox provided version (3.0.1) (BUT the 3.0.1 at Kubuntu's does
have the problem though)

-- 
Won't select multiple selects
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245103
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 245103] Re: Won't select multiple selects

[JoseLVG]

Definitely it's a widget-set problem on Kubuntu.

At work I installed the 32bit version of Firefox 3.0.1 from the Firefox
site and the problem persists (the one I tested in my previous comment
was the 64bit version at home)

The only difference between the 64bit version that works and the 32bit
that fails (both from Mozilla corp. and from kubuntu) is that for some
reason the 64bit defaults to a ugly widget-set (with suqare button
edges) that RENDERS the selections and checkboxes correctly while the
32bit uses the same Kubuntu provided look & feel (round-nice button
edges) than the Kubuntu installed version, so it fails to render
selections and checkboxes correctly when focused.

And I mean the widget-set, not the theme. If I download and set a
different theme the shape of the buttons, scrollbars... (the widgets)
does not change, only the icons change but the problem persists if the
widget-set is the Kubuntu one.

So... (while this gets fixed, if it's ever done...)

How do I change Firefox widget set?

-- 
Won't select multiple selects
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245103
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 223055] Re: Focused checkboxes and radio buttons rendered as grey rectangle

[JoseLVG]

Does this happen only in Kubuntu and NOT in Ubuntu then?

2008/7/18 Gary W. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> I also get this problem. Annoying, isn't it? I don't think it's just in
> Firefox though, as I've noticed it in the CompizConfig settings manager
> as well. Running KDE 3.5.9
>
> --
> Focused checkboxes and radio buttons rendered as grey rectangle
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223055
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
Focused checkboxes and radio buttons rendered as grey rectangle
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223055
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Team, which is subscribed to kubuntu-meta in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 228621] Re: Firefox 3 (Beta 5) Won't let me print

[JoseLVG]

This bug has disappeared in the latest revisions of firefox 3.0


2008/8/5 Pedro Villavicencio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Closing this bug report as no further information has been provided.
> Please feel free to reopen this bug if you can provide the information
> asked for. Thanks!.
>
> ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
>Status: Incomplete => Invalid
>
> --
> Firefox 3 (Beta 5) Won't let me print
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228621
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
Firefox 3 (Beta 5) Won't let me print
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228621
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: [i965, etc.] Poor graphics performance on Intel

[JoseLVG]

Wow!

Luciano: That is backports for Jaunty 9.04or just plain Ibex 8.10?
(I guess you need a 2.6.28 kernel anyway)

What it your chipset?
I wonder if my eee 901 with Intel GME 945 will benefit from this improvement
also.

Still 700FPS is less than half the 1500FPS this driver achieved in the "good
old TTM days", so I wonder how it is GEM an improvement or if there are
still many performance gains to come.

-- 
[i965, etc.] Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: [i965, etc.] Poor graphics performance on Intel

[JoseLVG]

I also agree, but there is nothing we can do, this bug report is just a
place to complain.

Some time ago (probably a year ago), someone or a group of people at intel
driver development, decided that they will throw away legacy driver code
(that was performing without so much user complaints as the current
releases) while they rewrote it. They thought is was a good idea. They were
too much confident they would fix it quickly enough before everybody
noticed... but they were wrong.

They should have done as you allways do this things, that is:

   1. You maintain the old stuff while you write the new driver.
   2. When the new driver is stable (and currently IT ISN'T!) then you
   change the defaults to point to the new driver and leave the old one as a
   fallback.
   3. Later, when the old stuff is no longer mainstream or obsolete and the
   new stuff is rock-solid, then, and only then, you get rid of the old stuff
   and leave the new code alone.

I know it is painful (as a developer I really know it is) and it may sound
old-fashion, but it is more practical in the end.

But they decided to take the risk, and as Murphy law states, "what could go
wrong went wrong". We may have drivers performing decently again in 2011 or
so, (by the time Google Chrome Linux will be delivered) in the meantime we
can just complain or... if you know graphics development, retro-backport the
old TTM code (or whatever it was called) in new kernel and distro
releases... it will probably take less time to do than fixing current GEM
drivers.


2009/1/12 jspudz 

> I agree with Snover. This issue is more then just "some" people
> experiencing problems.its everyone with an intel card. Like he said
> throw a stone and you will hit it.
>
> What exactly do you need, if not glxgears then tell us what. There are
> plenty of people with intel cards that are willing to provide the input
> you need including me but at this point we need to know what.
>
> The thing we all need to get at this point is its broke for all intel
> cards. Dont get mad because everyone with an intel card is reporting
> here because its broke. It's not their fault a release broke intel
> support.  I see no point in starting multiple threads on this, as it
> will just turn out to be multiple threads saying the same thing this one
> is.
>
> --
> [i965, etc.] Poor graphics performance on Intel
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
[i965, etc.] Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 252094] Re: Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 8.10

[JoseLVG]

I followed MPCs instructions on a eee 901 with an intel 945.

It was a complete disaster, it did not fix a thing. FPS seemed slightly
higher (600-700 instead of 500-600),  but there were the same rendering
errors when moving the glxgears window around.

I lost array.org's wired and wireless network and lost the keyboard
settings so I couldn't even check if a was running the proper intel
driver and drm versions. GoogleEarth seemed a bit smother but all text
were totaly lost so it was still unusable.

I totally discorage other eee users to try this if unsure. I guess we
have to wait for Ubuntu's or array.orgs fixes.

-- 
Poor graphics performance and rendering errors on Intel GM965 system, Ubuntu 
8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

[JoseLVG]

Have you tried GoogleEarth?
Does it work again?

Jose

2009/3/15 bingo 

> Finally some good news. I tested ubuntu 9.04 alpha-6, and the results
> are back to where I would like to see them.
>
> Bryce, to reflect your comments, I tested with flightgear and got frame
> rates between 15 and 23 fps depending on the scenary with the on-board
> graphics subsystem, i.e. the X3000 graphics processor. This is a
> significant improvement over the 1-2 fps frame rate seen previously.
>
> For those testing with glxgears, my figures are back to around 1350
> frames per second. The Xorg.log file states that EXA acceleration method
> is being used.
>
> It seems that all the development work has finally been converging,
> thank you. I have attached the xorg.log file for your reference.
>
> Bingo
>
> ** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log"
>   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23874068/Xorg.0.log
>
> --
> MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

[JoseLVG]

Latest Jaunty tested on an Asus eee901 (945GME I think)

Results:
- glxgears arround 600fps (not very spectacular)
- SAME RENDERING ERRORS as usual when moving the glxgears window arround
(compiz effects on)

I think Jaunty will still have this problems.
(If it takes them so much time to stabilize this code... maybe this driver
rewrite was not good idea at all)

Jose

-- 
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

[JoseLVG]

Wonderful! ... now is so slow it takes 30seconds to display a key when I
type it!

Its great this UXA DECELERATION METHOD! Shuld be renamed UXD!

After 10minutes of a completely irresponsible GUI I could type glxgears to
see number below 300fps... but I could NOT see them moving they where just
fixed... and I could NOT test the rendering problems as it was imposible to
drag the window to move it arround. It's completely unusable... and the eee
901 is quite apopular machine!!

Isn't Ubuntu trying to get into the netbook market? With drivers such as
this one thats is IMPOSIBLE!

Jose

2009/3/19 Ivan Stetsenko 

>  JoseLVG, are you using UXA acceleration? It is not enabled by default,
> you need to enable it manually by editing your xorg.conf (add
>
> Option "AccelMethod" "UXA"
>
> to the Device section of the xorg.conf).. With UXA your rendering
> problems should go away, but there is some amount of instability (that's
> why UXA is not used by default) and some little colour corruption as
> well. But you'll definitely need to give it a try.
>
> --
> MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

[JoseLVG]

With Sync Vblank unchecked... (and AFTER installing a universe or multiverse
package NOT enabled by default...)

- glxgears 230fps (great!! amazing!)
- BUT  NO RENDERING ERRORS

I am still very unimpressed. If I want to use the full capabilities of this
eee 901 graphics hardware the only way is to install WinXP!! (what a crap!)
Seriuosly! I don't care if more or less Windosers switch to Linux... but why
should WE (the linuxers) suffer worse performance and CRAPY graphics drivers
like these!
Do they do (Intel) it on purpose? Why can't they do drivers that compare
with their own windows ones? Is it that much difficult in linux?

Jose

2009/3/19 Ivan Stetsenko 

> Can you check that " Sync to Vblank" checkbox is UNchecked in the compiz
> settings -> general -> Display settings?
>
> --
> MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

[JoseLVG]

I forgot!
The system freezes with UXA after a while.

Good luck to Ubuntu in the Netbook market, they are going to need it!

Jose

2009/3/19 Jose Luis Vazquez 

> With Sync Vblank unchecked... (and AFTER installing a universe or
> multiverse package NOT enabled by default...)
>
> - glxgears 230fps (great!! amazing!)
> - BUT  NO RENDERING ERRORS
>
> I am still very unimpressed. If I want to use the full capabilities of this
> eee 901 graphics hardware the only way is to install WinXP!! (what a crap!)
> Seriuosly! I don't care if more or less Windosers switch to Linux... but
> why should WE (the linuxers) suffer worse performance and CRAPY graphics
> drivers like these!
> Do they do (Intel) it on purpose? Why can't they do drivers that compare
> with their own windows ones? Is it that much difficult in linux?
>
> Jose
>
> 2009/3/19 Ivan Stetsenko 
>
>> Can you check that " Sync to Vblank" checkbox is UNchecked in the compiz
>>
>> settings -> general -> Display settings?
>>
>> --
>> MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
>> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
>> of the bug.
>>
>

-- 
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

[JoseLVG]

On Jaunty or Ibex?

I tried it (ForceEnablePipeA + UXA) on a eee 901 with 8.10 Intrepid Ibex and
it did not fix anything.

My eee 901 has an Intel 945GME, no one else has this chipset?

Jose

2009/4/12 andrehsiqueira 

> On my notebook Toshiba U205 S5034 - with Intel VGA compatible
> controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express
> Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03), I fix the performance issue by
> a change into xorg.conf:
>
> Section "Device"
>Identifier  "Configured Video Device"
>
> # It turns off disabling pipa A by a driver after while.
># Its 100 % working workaround.
>Option "ForceEnablePipeA" "true"
>
># restore COMPIZ performance
>Option "AccelMethod" "UXA"
>
># Option "FramebufferCompression" "off"
> EndSection
>
> --
> MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

[JoseLVG]

Tried ForceEnablePipeA + UXA on Juanty beta over an eee 901. Results:

- Rendering errors on Compiz went away.
- Glxgears FPSs dro from 600 to 150.
- GoogleEarth crash due to libssl 0.9.8 error (couldn't test performance)
- Planetpenguin racer: not very smooth 3-4 fps at 1024x600
- Tremulous didn't start either. (Maybe because testing jaunty on a
pendrive?)

Not very impressive performance after all.

Jose

-- 
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 228621] Re: Firefox 3 (Beta 5) Won't let me print

[JoseLVG]

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14389889/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "pluginreg.dat.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14389890/pluginreg.dat.txt

** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14389892/profiles.ini.txt

-- 
Firefox 3 (Beta 5) Won't let me print
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228621
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 228621] [NEW] Firefox 3 (Beta 5) Won't let me print

[JoseLVG]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: firefox-3.0

When trying to print (File->Print...)  the dialog disables the print
button for all printers but the "print to file option". No message or
reason is given neither in Firefox's GUI nor in the the console
(executing it manuallly from konsole). Therefore I can't even try to
print. (I have to open the same URL on Konqueror that prints ok with
kprinter)

It happens on a kubuntu 8.04 in all users (so it is not a corrupted user
config profile)

#lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 8.04
Release:8.04

#apt-cache policy firefox
firefox:
  Instalados: 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu3
  Candidato: 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu3
  Tabla de versión:
 *** 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri May  9 12:41:56 2008
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: firefox-3.0 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu3
PackageArchitecture: i386
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/games
 LANG=es_ES.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: firefox-3.0
Uname: Linux 2.6.24-17-generic i686

** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug

-- 
Firefox 3 (Beta 5) Won't let me print
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228621
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 182114] Re: k3b: cdrom not recognized after burning

[JoseLVG]

Thanks,

At least now I know it's a k3b error and not a weird config in my system.
And also the hdparm will be very useful to avoid reset the PC everytime I
burn a CD/DVD.

(I assume the command lets you use the CD again, even if k3b is still not
able to re-burn another one)

2008/1/19, Patrick McFarland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> The problem is K3B is no longer ejecting and reloading the disc,
> ignoring whats set in preferences: you absolutely must eject the disc
> after burning on many drives, issuing any commands afterwards (such as
> trying to verify contents) will cause the drive to lock up.
>
> You can fix this by running hdparm -w /dev/cdrom && hdparm -d1
> /dev/cdrom, but it still breaks k3b's verify disc function.
>
> I am also suffering from this bug, and manually running genisoimage,
> wodim, eject, then eject -t then using md5sum or some other method to
> verify works, k3b is simply not ejecting the disc and reloading. IMO
> this is a critical bug.
>
> --
> k3b: cdrom not recognized after burning
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182114
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
k3b: cdrom not recognized after burning
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182114
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Team, which is a bug contact for k3b in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs

[Bug 182114] k3b: cdrom not recognized after burning

[JoseLVG]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: k3b

When I need to write a DVD-R:
1) I plug it in and k3b recognizes it as a blank DVD and allows me to burn it 
with the desired contents.
2) After a succesful burn of teh DVD, the disc is not recognized by the system. 
Even if I eject it and put it in again it does not get recognized. 

No messages show up in dmesg or syslog. Other CDs get recognized but not the 
DVD I just wrote. 
The strange thing is that the DVD is burn succesfully and can be played in 
other computers.
My system is a Dell dimension e521 with Kubuntu Gutsy.

** Affects: k3b (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
k3b: cdrom not recognized after burning
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182114
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Team, which is a bug contact for k3b in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs

[Bug 253246] hey~

[JoseLVG]

Dear friend,
Last week,My relative gives me a website : www.elecls.com
。
It mainly sell electronic products。 the website is promoting their
products。it is very cheap and I get it in 5 days。Its quality is very
good。The promotion only has 45 days。 So , if you are interested in 。
you can spend several minutes to have a look. I think you will be very
surprise。
Greetings!

-- 
suspend not working in e512+nvidia 7600gt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253246
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs