Re: [Bug 64594] Re: hurestore will always crash on startup (unfinished tool)
I agree. Between sbackup which "appears" to be working correctly, and hubackup/restore which doesn't work at all, I'm just about ready to start scripting my own backup scheme which I don't want to do, but I agree, hu* shouldn't even be mentioned and should be removed from the repos until it does work, and on the off chance that it actually has been fixed, it should be put on the queue to upgrade. On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 14:03, Milan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This bug is still not fixed. Hurestore is not a finished program, and > would better be removed from the repositories. Don't hope you'll get it > for Intrepid... > > -- > hurestore will always crash on startup (unfinished tool) > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64594 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. -- hurestore will always crash on startup (unfinished tool) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64594 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 218322] Re: video playback artifacts when composite manager is enabled
Not a solution but on 8.04 32bit mplayer works On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 15:57, JosephK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > video playback fails in totem when metacity compositing is on. > i'm running intrepid 32bit fully updated. > thanks > > ** Attachment added: "lspci" > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19602404/lspci > > -- > video playback artifacts when composite manager is enabled > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218322 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- I've discovered the key to success is to never give up. You either learn the right way, or you run out of ways to do it wrong. A win/win situation! -- video playback artifacts when composite manager is enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 135471] Re: Addressbook crash when searching contacts by "any field contains"
I confirm on 2.22.3.1 in 32 bit Hardy, this is working. On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:35, runout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > in ubuntu 8.10 interepit it seems we have this problem again. > i did not have it on 8.04 hardy. only since the upgrade > evolution 2.24.1 > $ uname -v > #1 SMP Thu Nov 6 17:38:14 UTC 2008 > > -- > Addressbook crash when searching contacts by "any field contains" > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135471 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- I've discovered the key to success is to never give up. You either learn the right way, or you run out of ways to do it wrong. A win/win situation! -- Addressbook crash when searching contacts by "any field contains" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135471 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 228806] Re: [MASTER] various unrelated crashes for firefox-3.0 and xulrunner-1.9
Yeah that did it alright :-) On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 17:18, kuba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > try this page. > its an image 50 pixels wide, 272K: > http://www.dobroc.com/kuba/test.png > > my firefox (on ubuntu) crashes instantly. > > -- > [MASTER] various unrelated crashes for firefox-3.0 and xulrunner-1.9 > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228806 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- I've discovered the key to success is to never give up. You either learn the right way, or you run out of ways to do it wrong. A win/win situation! -- [MASTER] various unrelated crashes for firefox-3.0 and xulrunner-1.9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228806 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 163544] Re: tracker search tool shows no results
Re-indexing does fix the problem. The issue is that first of all, this shouldn't happen, and secondly, it happens frequently enough that re-indexing every time the results fail to display is not convenient and makes tracker not ready for everyday use. On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 19:56, ichhaankur wrote: > I noticed that if you reindex, then the problem disappears! > > -- > tracker search tool shows no results > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/163544 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in “tracker” source package in Ubuntu: New > > Bug description: > See the attached screenshots. Same with any query string. > -- I've discovered the key to success is to never give up. You either learn the right way, or you run out of ways to do it wrong. A win/win situation! -- tracker search tool shows no results https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/163544 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 163544] Re: tracker search tool shows no results
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 19:56, ichhaankur wrote: > I noticed that if you reindex, then the problem disappears! > > -- > tracker search tool shows no results > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/163544 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in “tracker” source package in Ubuntu: New > > Bug description: > See the attached screenshots. Same with any query string. > -- I've discovered the key to success is to never give up. You either learn the right way, or you run out of ways to do it wrong. A win/win situation! -- tracker search tool shows no results https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/163544 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
I was in the office on a separate network and the problem still exists. False alarm. Sorry. On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 14:52, gerstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In my case, the problem still remains. All Samba-Shares even from other > Linux-Computers can be viewed, but all the Shares of Windows-PCs are not > seen. In Konqueror, both can be viewed. > > What I don't understand, that it requests the password after entering > into the share, not before browsing to PC. In Konqueror you must type it > when you enter into the Computer to view all the shares, instead of > entering into the share and typing then. > > Am Samstag, den 11.10.2008, 18:37 + schrieb John Toliver: > > I know this has been stated repeatedly, however when I use the ubuntu (or > > nautilus) network icon to browse (instead of the one created by fusesmb), > I > > no longer have the problem viewing the shares on other machines. Nothing > > else on my setup has changed. I will continue to test my network > browsing > > as I move between different networks. In any case, thank you much for > the > > update. > > > > On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 13:19, Steve Langasek > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:10:01PM -, John Toliver wrote: > > > > I just got an update to samba and it seems to have fixed this for me. > > > > > > If a samba update fixed anything for you, it was not this bug. This is > not > > > a bug in samba. > > > > > > -- > > > Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free > OS > > > Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the > world. > > > Ubuntu Developer > http://www.debian.org/ > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > > > nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS > network. > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 > > > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > > > of the bug. > > > > > > > > > -- > > I've discovered the key to success is to never give up. You either learn > > the right way, or you run out of ways to do it wrong. A win/win > situation! > > > > -- > > nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS > network. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 > > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > > of a duplicate bug. > > > > Status in gvfs: Confirmed > > Status in "gvfs" source package in Ubuntu: Triaged > > Status in "nautilus" source package in Ubuntu: Invalid > > Status in gvfs in Ubuntu Hardy: In Progress > > Status in nautilus in Ubuntu Hardy: Invalid > > > > Bug description: > > Binary package hint: nautilus > > > > Using hardy beta, when I browse with nautilus other machines in an Active > Directory (ADS) network, some of them do not show their shared folders. > > The ADS integration of the hardy box was done using winbind, kerberos and > PAM libraries, essentially as described here: > > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ActiveDirectoryWinbindHowto > > The network contains mostly windows clients, but also several linux > boxes, which were joined to the ADS domain with the command: 'net ads join'. > > Machines running windows XP, windows 2003 and samba show '0 objects' in > nautilus, but after inserting the complete path (eg.: smb://server/share) > the folders can be accessed after the password prompt. > > Machines running windows 2000 show their folders regularly. > > > > Here is a detailed description of what happens: > > > > Case 1 > - > > Browsing from hardy-beta a machine running ubuntu-gutsy server. > > > > In a terminal window: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ smbclient -L gutsy-server > > Password: (password inserted here) > > Domain=[LAB] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.26a] > > Sharename Type Comment > > - --- > > IPC$ IPC IPC Service (gutsy-server (Samba 3.0.26a, Ubuntu)) > > share Disk gutsy-server_share > > Domain=[LAB] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.26a] > > > > In Nautilus: > > > > Open Network --> Double-click on the 'LAB' icon (Domain) --> All machines > are displayed; > > Double-click on the 'gutsy-server' icon --> after a while, Nautilus > returns '0 objects', without asking for a password; &
Re: [Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
I know this has been stated repeatedly, however when I use the ubuntu (or nautilus) network icon to browse (instead of the one created by fusesmb), I no longer have the problem viewing the shares on other machines. Nothing else on my setup has changed. I will continue to test my network browsing as I move between different networks. In any case, thank you much for the update. On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 13:19, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:10:01PM -0000, John Toliver wrote: > > I just got an update to samba and it seems to have fixed this for me. > > If a samba update fixed anything for you, it was not this bug. This is not > a bug in samba. > > -- > Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS > Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. > Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- I've discovered the key to success is to never give up. You either learn the right way, or you run out of ways to do it wrong. A win/win situation! -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
Have we heard anything from Canonical about why gvfs was included in the first place? I mean I've heard Debian Lenny which is about to be released still uses the older gnome-vfs. On another note, I would like to know how I might apply the patch made by Darkrain42(I think) which fixes this. On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 05:13, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the users frustration there is understandable but those comment are not > really constructive, the ubuntu team doesn't have the ressources to do > the upstream work and you are having rude comments for contributors > which are doing a lot of work for free to try to make ubuntu a system > which is nice to use > > -- > nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- I've discovered the key to success is to never give up. You either learn the right way, or you run out of ways to do it wrong. A win/win situation! -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 15019] Re: Difficulty downgrading packages with dependencies
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 18:16 +, Mr. Mike wrote: > The big scenario for me on this is when I finally learned/figured-out that > the "Proposed" repository is more or less for alpha/beta versions of stuff. > Right?? > So, when I stopped using those repos, my Ubuntu became way more stable, > Suspend starting working properly (proposed kernel is probably the worst > choice if you just want to be a user, no?) Oh yes I learned that too. It makes sense. I think I attached this question in reference to an issue with upgrading to a version of Openoffice with a bug. It didn't come from the 'proposed' though. I just wanted to know if a clean way to go backwards existed. Anyway I ended up installing the Non-Ubuntu'ized' version until I found a suitable workaround. -- Difficulty downgrading packages with dependencies https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222826] Re: Openoffice.org 2.4 will not run reports created in version 2.3.1
I will provide better data as I'm in a hurry now but I ended up resolving it by doing some manual editing of my 2.3 formatted data to make it 2.4 compliant. I'm no longer able to accurately tell you if this would occur as my reports worked afterwards. -- Openoffice.org 2.4 will not run reports created in version 2.3.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222826 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations
Slightly off topic but I was trying to install nautilus 2.24 (or whichever version comes with intrepid). I enabled the repos from intrepid and still nothing. Any ideas? On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:26, Geert Jan Alsem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > C10uD, you should specifiy which version of Ubuntu/GNOME you are using. > But unless it's Ubuntu 8.10/GNOME 2.24 you don't have to bother. > > So, has anyone tried GNOME 2.24 yet? This bug was planned to be fixed in > that release. I'll try GNOME 2.24 myself in a couple of days when the > Ubuntu 8.10 beta comes out. > > -- > GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start > in some situations > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- I've discovered the key to success is to never give up. You either learn the right way, or you run out of ways to do it wrong. A win/win situation! -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations
Find the right repository if anyone is interested: deb http://*fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu* intrepid main On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:57, John Toliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Slightly off topic but I was trying to install nautilus 2.24 (or whichever > version comes with intrepid). I enabled the repos from intrepid and still > nothing. Any ideas? > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:26, Geert Jan Alsem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> C10uD, you should specifiy which version of Ubuntu/GNOME you are using. >> But unless it's Ubuntu 8.10/GNOME 2.24 you don't have to bother. >> >> So, has anyone tried GNOME 2.24 yet? This bug was planned to be fixed in >> that release. I'll try GNOME 2.24 myself in a couple of days when the >> Ubuntu 8.10 beta comes out. >> >> -- >> GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session >> start in some situations >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 >> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber >> of the bug. >> > > > > -- > I've discovered the key to success is to never give up. You either learn > the right way, or you run out of ways to do it wrong. A win/win situation! > -- I've discovered the key to success is to never give up. You either learn the right way, or you run out of ways to do it wrong. A win/win situation! -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
fusesmb is a fairly decent work around from the home user perspective. In light of the fact that upstream isn't addressing the fix or at least it isn't available yet, does anyone know of a way to ask Canonical to downgrade to the version of samba that worked properly in Gutsy? Would it be THAT much of a dependency problem? On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 15:03, wolfwitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Agreed/Ditto. I've pretty much given up on it. The best "solution" I've > found is to set up shortcuts to every share I use, since browsing is > pretty much impossible. This isn't really Ubuntu's fault since it is a > problem with an upstream vendor, but it's a bit ridiculous that this bug > has been know about for almost seven months now and hasn't been fixed. > It's been reworded and duped all over the place, and it seems it's being > spun more than fixed. > > -- > nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- I've discovered the key to success is to never give up. You either learn the right way, or you run out of ways to do it wrong. A win/win situation! -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
I might just give that a try... thank you. On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 18:13, Tim Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 19:58 +, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > changing GNOME to use gnomevfs rather than gvfs would basically means > > downgrading some hundred applications and the GNOME desktop to its gutsy > > version, you can as well use gutsy if that's to do that change > > > Or use the about to be released Debian Lenny, which has kept gnomevfs > probably because of some still open bugs in gvfs. I used Hardy, so I > miss some features of gvfs after moving to Lenny, but I think the Debian > developers made on balance the right choice for their release. Certainly > for me: I use my laptop in an office with a Windows server. > > -- > nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- I've discovered the key to success is to never give up. You either learn the right way, or you run out of ways to do it wrong. A win/win situation! -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 207072] Konqueror is an option
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 06:36 +, gerstrong wrote: > Another option would be using konqueror with KDE instead of gnome and > friends for browsing windows shares. I sometimes use konqueror, that > works too. Yes I briefly looked at KDE as well. Problem with it is when you try to stream a video etc. across your network, KDE tries to download the whole thing in cache before beginning to play it. Really annoying. -- I've discovered the key to success is to never give up. You either learn the right way, or you run out of ways to do it wrong. A win/win situation! -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
I just got an update to samba and it seems to have fixed this for me. I don't want to get everyone's hopes up but give it a try. The update also came with a bunch of things, like a kernel update, etc. On Sat, 2008-10-11 at 08:59 +, gerstrong wrote: > Bug is also in Ubuntu daily-live of october 11th. > > Hope that gvfs will be fixed! On Samba workstations, the shares can be > viewed and you can still write manually the direction to enter... > -- I've discovered the key to success is to never give up. You either learn the right way, or you run out of ways to do it wrong. A win/win situation! -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 312535] [NEW] When trying to produce a .PDF file from openoffice
Public bug reported: OS is Hardy 8.04 fully patched Openoffice.org 3.0 Here are the four programs I have used to test this: 1. Evince 2. Xournal (which has some limited pdf editing capability through use of layers) 3. Acrobat reader 8 for linux 4. Foxit reader 2.2 for Windows Scenario 1: When I create a document in Openoffice and wish for this document to be readable on all platforms I select "export to PDF" I then usually leave the default options except I select the PDF/A1 as the help says it preserves internally all the fonts used in the document. When I wish to print a hard copy of the document, if I print from acrobat reader all of the text is garbage though the display is correct. When I open the same document in xournal it prints properly. When I open in evince (which I try to avoid because of another printing problem I have with it) it prints properly. When I open the file on a windows installation using foxit reader 2.2 it displays garbage. On each platform if it displayed garbage it will print garbage except for acrobat which will display the text normally but still print garbage. 1. Xournal - result=normal 2. Evince - result=normal 3. Acrobat 8 - result= normal display but garbage printout 4. Windows foxit reader 2.2 - result garbage display and printout Scenario 2: I create the document in openoffice and I create another in gedit( the purpose is to narrow whether it is openoffice export mechanism or a different part of the PDF printing process) This time I use "print to PDF" (the built in PDF printer that shipped with Hardy) and then open in Acrobat and in foxit reader. In Acrobat, the text is normal and the printout is garbage data. When I open the same document on foxit reader in windows the display and print out is clean for both documents. 1. Xournal - not tested 2. Evince - not tested 3. Acrobat8 Hardy - result= display normal and garbage print 4. foxit reader on windows result = display and print is good Scenario 3 Created document in openoffice and exported from openoffice. then I printed on foxit and display was clear and print was clear. I am not certain where the problem is but I think it is in Acrobat. This is the reason I did not attach this to a certain application or create the bug through the "report a problem" provision from within the application. I will attach the documents I used. On "test.pdf" , it was created and exported as mentioned above in Oo.o3. OTH, "Unsaved_Document_1.pdf" and "Part_D_journal.pdf" were both created using the Hardy PDF converter. for "Part D Journal" it was created in openoffice and exported in openoffice. I realized after I started typing that launchpad only allows for 1 attachment in this post so I put all four in one file gzip'd. Any help would be appreciated. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- When trying to produce a .PDF file from openoffice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312535 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 312535] Re: When trying to produce a .PDF file from openoffice
** Attachment added: "TestedDocuments.pdf.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20819112/TestedDocuments.pdf.gz -- When trying to produce a .PDF file from openoffice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312535 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 16:44, FAJALOU wrote: > I agree with John; I have no idea how to apply the patch, but would love > to know how, anyone help? 8.04.1 here. Thanks > JT - Yeah. I figured out why everyone ignored me. Apparently Linux has this nice little command called "patch" which 'patches' an original file with the 'new.patch' file. I didn't do the patch as it's for an older version of gvfs than what I have and I didn't know how that would affect my system, nor did I know how to update it for my version, but basically you say "patch [options] at the CLI. So basically the originally installed file that isn't authenticating when browsing gets all the additions from the text file darkrain42 made. You select all text and save it as "whatever.patch". I still don't know which original gvfs file to patch but you can get an idea, I think from looking in synaptic at the gvfs files, and then look at the tab that lists where all the installed files are. For more reading do "man patch" at the CLI and it tells you how .patch files are made but I'm waiting on an official backport (or until I figure out how to safely patch my system ;-p) as it's not a show stopper for me at the moment. HTH JT -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
Renzo, Thanks for the reply. I completely missed 54-57 and they helped much. Just as a note in case someone else runs into this: I downloaded the source which placed a folder called "gvfs-0.2.5". Then moved to ~/gvfs-0.2.5/daemon/ folder and downloaded and saved the patched titled "patch to prefer kerberos, then fall back to password" with the filename "authent.patch" in the daemon folder. I ran this command "$ patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
I have been researching this and trying to figure out how to apply the patch that has been mentioned above that includes authentication in browsing of shares. So the way to apply this patch is this: "sudo patch [options] " I need to know the file that is supposed to be patched. This would make the first time I'm trying this so do I need to know anything else? Can I back up the original file before the patch in case things go south? Any help is appreciated. -- nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 15019] Re: Difficulty downgrading packages with dependencies
So then if I were to install a package and find that the package has a bug for which no patch exists at the time, and I decide I want to go back to what I had earlier that worked, how am I supposed to do this? -- Difficulty downgrading packages with dependencies https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222826] [NEW] Openoffice.org 2.4 will not run reports created in version 2.3.1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org When I upgraded Ubuntu Linux from version 7.10 to 8.04, the package Openoffice 2.3.1 was upgraded to 2.4. When I open up a database I created in version 2.3.1, and attempt to run a report, the report fails with this error: "The query with the statement '' could not be run. Check your data source." I have various reports all created in 2.3.1 and all reports break with the same error message. Further investigation reveals the query the reports display data from function properly. The data from the tables is intact and I can find no other issues in the database except the report itself. See below for links to Openoffice.org forums which indicate the issue may relate to dynamic reports, and also reports created using the standard Openoffice wizard. Others report similar symptoms on both windows and Linux machines see here: http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtopic.phtml?t=69966 and here: http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtopic.phtml?t=70475&highlight=query+statement+run+check+cheque+data+source The version is Hardy Heron Kernel 2.6.24-16-generic, Gnome 2.22.1 and when the problem occurred I was using 2.4 the release that was installed automatically with the distribution upgrade. ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Openoffice.org 2.4 will not run reports created in version 2.3.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222826 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations
Actually it's stopped doing this. I don't believe I've done anything differently. It's gone from a problem happening every reboot to happening every month etc. The next time it does happen I will move the icons a few pixels away and test this On Feb 6, 2008 10:26 AM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you mean posision as the posision specified in gconf? Because that > would be interesting. There is a configuration option for panel applets, > called panel_right_stick. It seems that all of thiese problems are > related to applets on the far right of the screen. Has anyone tried to > move the panels a couple of pixels away from the edge and other applets > and made sure panel_right_stick isn't enabled? It's just a wild guess, > but could be worth a try. > > Is it always the clock that's being pushed to the left? It's the applet > that takes the longest time to load here.. Might that have anything to > do with it? > > > -- > GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start > in some situations > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- Patience yields far greater results than brute force or rage ever could so relax..it's just life !!! -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 164798] Yelp crashes when clicking on link in page for "dive into python" causes yelp to close immediately with no warning
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp 1. Use any method to get to the page with the link for "dive into python" 2. Click on link 3. Yelp dies. yelp v.2.20.0 System is: T23 1.13Ghz 1GB Ram 30GB HDD Gutsy 7.10 Kernel 2.6.22-14-Generic gnome 2.20.1 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Nov 24 00:14:24 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp NonfreeKernelModules: ath_hal Package: yelp 2.20.0-0ubuntu3 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: yelp ProcCwd: /home/john ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux Ubuntu 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Sun Oct 14 23:05:12 GMT 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: yelp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- Yelp crashes when clicking on link in page for "dive into python" causes yelp to close immediately with no warning https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 164798] Re: Yelp crashes when clicking on link in page for "dive into python" causes yelp to close immediately with no warning
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10540675/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10540676/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10540677/ProcStatus.txt -- Yelp crashes when clicking on link in page for "dive into python" causes yelp to close immediately with no warning https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 164798] Re: Yelp crashes when clicking on link in page for "dive into python" causes yelp to close immediately with no warning
** Attachment added: "This is the page I was referring to" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10540687/Screenshot-1.png -- Yelp crashes when clicking on link in page for "dive into python" causes yelp to close immediately with no warning https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations
I notice it happens when I reboot, and no resolution changes, nor have I added anything new to the panel. Two Icons on the far left simply appeared in interchanged positions. For example, the icons were in position 1-2-3-4-5-6-7 before reboot, and after reboot they are in position 1-2-3-4-5-7-6. Again all icons are locked. This happens on kernel 2.6.22-14 generic, gnome 2.20.1. Please advise if more information required. -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 04:13, Coz wrote: > hey guys, > I would like to confirm this... as though there aren't enough already!! :) > Ubuntu Karmic as well as several versions before karmic. > this is probably one of the most irritating bugs on gnome > I dont know if this is going to be fixed before gnome3 comes out. > I havent tested this on Lucid yet but suspect it will be the same > > coz I've done the thing where you place dividers in between each element you have and lock them all down. For the time being it's working fairly consistently for me, but my screen also doesn't change resolutions that often either so ymmv. HTH -- I've discovered the key to success is to never give up. You either learn the right way, or you run out of ways to do it wrong. A win/win situation! -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations
Be a part of the solution not the problem. Download the patch, apply the diff, and quit the crying. On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 12:27, Someone wrote: > AMAZING an opearating system with the best feature ever: > PANEL SHUFFLE! > > It is guaranteed to shuffle your panel icons so you can have a messed up > panel every time you change your screen! > This feature was inspired by the shuffle feature in most media players, so > why should you only be able to shuffle you music when you can shuffle your > panel! > > Download any version of Linux with Gnome and you can to enjoy the > amazing feature that is GNOME PANEL SHUFFLE!!! > > -- > GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start > in some situations > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in Desktop panel for GNOME: Confirmed > Status in One Hundred Paper Cuts: In Progress > Status in “gnome-panel” package in Ubuntu: Triaged > Status in “gnome-panel” source package in Hardy: Triaged > > Bug description: > I have noticed for a while now that the above-mentioned phenomenon occurs > when I, say, return from a shut-down. However, the strange thing is that it > only happens on some occations. I don't really know what the problem is, so > I can't, unfortunately, post more information. > > > > To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-panel/+bug/44082/+subscribe > -- I've discovered the key to success is to never give up. You either learn the right way, or you run out of ways to do it wrong. A win/win situation! -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 15019] Re: Difficulty downgrading packages with dependencies
It's been a while so I don't remember the conversation but I think you turn off the proposed repos in synaptic and then do the updates. Synaptic will recognize it is dealing with different versions that what is in the stable branch and downgrade things back to those version numbers. I would ask for someone else to verify that but I believe that is what I did. 2009/9/24 ಸಿಂಧು ಸುಂದರ > So how exactly does one _mass_ downgrade packages from "newer than those > found in archive" to the versions _found_ in archive? > > Can someone provide me with the CLI command please? *pleading eyes* > > -- > Difficulty downgrading packages with dependencies > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15019 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in “synaptic” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed > > Bug description: > There are some difficulties that I have found with downgrading packages > that > have dependencies on the version that I am changing. It would be nice if > downgrades were as easy as upgrades (though I completely understand the > difficulty in this). There are two particular situations that I have been > frustrated with: > > 1) If the package to be downgraded is depended on at that version by other > packages. This will usually notify you that those packages will be removed > because of breaking dependencies. However it is commonly the case (I'm > thinking > *-dev packages) where the dependent package could be downgraded and, as a > result, no package removals would be necessary. > > 2) If a package being downgraded depends on a package of the current > version. > This is even more frustrating. Synaptic will actually just ignore the > request > and not provide an explanation. If the depended package were downgraded > along > with this package all conflicts would be resolved. > > The current method I have been using to get around this is to let synaptic > remove the prackages, and before I commit I'll force the versions to what > they > need to be. This is difficult and annoying. I see two ways of fixing this, > an > easy to implement but less automated way, and a difficult to implement but > highly optimized way. The easy way is to actually support force version for > packages under a multiple select and try and force all of them not just the > last > clicked. The other way would be to check to see when a downgrade is > requested > that causes conflicts if there is a set of version changes that will fix > the > problem. In either case I think allowing force version on a selection of > packages is a must. This (ideally) would let you even deal with different > packages that have different versions to choose from all collected > together. > > Hope this is constructive, I enjoy this software and hope you guys keep up > the > good work. > -- I've discovered the key to success is to never give up. You either learn the right way, or you run out of ways to do it wrong. A win/win situation! -- Difficulty downgrading packages with dependencies https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1862423] Re: Save directory for gnome-screenshots cannot be changed
Possible workaround until this bug gets fixed: I made my own shortcut in settings "/usr/bin/gnome-screenshots -i" Then I assigned shortcut to be print screen. Interactive mode does remember last saved directory so that's a safe work around for the archive. Hope this helps somebody. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862423 Title: Save directory for gnome-screenshots cannot be changed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1862423/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1862423] Re: Save directory for gnome-screenshots cannot be changed
I found this extension while researching another problem. I invite any thoughts on its usage with regard to security. https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/1112/screenshot-tool/ gthub info here https://github.com/OttoAllmendinger/gnome-shell-screenshot/ Hope this helps. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862423 Title: Save directory for gnome-screenshots cannot be changed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screenshot/+bug/1862423/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparentlyrandomly on session start in some situations
So does the status being a confirmed fix release mean that eventually the fix will get pushed out in an update at some point in the future? Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Bug Watch Updater <44...@bugs.launchpad.net> Sender: boun...@canonical.com Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 15:27:22 To: Reply-To: Bug 44082 <44...@bugs.launchpad.net> Subject: [Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations ** Changed in: gnome-panel Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in Desktop panel for GNOME: Confirmed Status in One Hundred Paper Cuts: Invalid Status in “gnome-panel” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in “gnome-panel” source package in Hardy: Triaged Bug description: The items on the gnome panel is disordered in some cases, one of these being changing the screen reolution, possibly other, more random, cases as well. - Temporary solution: Backup the state of your panel: gconftool-2 --dump /apps/panel panel_backup.xml and then restore it whenever it gets messed up: gconftool-2 --load panel_backup.xml killall gnome-panel (kills and auto-respawns, possibly need to run gnome-panel & as well) - I have noticed for a while now that the above-mentioned phenomenon occurs when I, say, return from a shut-down. However, the strange thing is that it only happens on some occations. I don't really know what the problem is, so I can't, unfortunately, post more information. To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-panel/+bug/44082/+subscribe -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 529714] Re: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in_nss_wins_gethostbyname_r()
@Brendan Peterfly, When you get some time can you list the steps you took so I can duplicate it on my test machine. Its not urgent however... At least for me it isn't. -Original Message- From: Brendan Peterffy <529...@bugs.launchpad.net> Sender: boun...@canonical.com Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 09:48:23 To: Reply-To: Bug 529714 <529...@bugs.launchpad.net> Subject: [Bug 529714] Re: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in _nss_wins_gethostbyname_r() Okay, this is odd. I've gotten the source for samba using "apt-get source winbind", built it without optimizations, then used LD_PRELOAD to override the system's copy of libnss_wins.so with my fresh copy, then launched rhythmbox (which segfaulted whenever it tried to resolve a hostname.) and it isn't crashing! I'll do some investigating to see if it was gcc's optimizations that mucked it up or some other cause, but at least this is progress! It's 5 AM here, so I ought to get to bed, but I'll dig deeper tomorrow! -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of a duplicate bug (550048). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529714 Title: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in_nss_wins_gethostbyname_r() Status in “samba” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Binary package hint: rhythmbox rhythmbox crashes when trying to access the Ubuntu One music store. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Feb 28 16:05:20 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 EcryptfsInUse: Yes ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/rhythmbox Package: rhythmbox 0.12.6git20100223-0ubuntu1 ProcCmdline: rhythmbox ProcEnviron: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-14.20-generic SegvAnalysis: Segfault happened at: 0x223f682 <_nss_wins_gethostbyname_r+914>: movl $0x0,(%eax) PC (0x0223f682) ok source "$0x0" ok destination "(%eax)" (0x) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)! SegvReason: writing NULL VMA Signal: 11 SourcePackage: rhythmbox StacktraceTop: _nss_wins_gethostbyname_r () from /lib/libnss_wins.so.2 _nss_wins_gethostbyname2_r () from /lib/libnss_wins.so.2 ?? () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 getaddrinfo () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 ?? () from /usr/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0 Title: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in_nss_wins_gethostbyname_r() Uname: Linux 2.6.32-14-generic i686 UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/529714/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529714 Title: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in _nss_wins_gethostbyname_r() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparentlyrandomly on session start in some situations
This bug will not be fixed. In theory, the problem is going to be corrected whenever gnome 3.0 is released, and will have a completely different architecture for panels etc. -Original Message- From: Kevin Hunter Sender: boun...@canonical.com Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:35:01 To: Reply-To: Bug 44082 <44...@bugs.launchpad.net> Subject: [Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations sk8erbender: Thank you for the bug confirmation. However, Dylan McCall put it succinctly in comment #202: "The source of this problem is really close to the heart of the panel's design. It allows user-defined positions for applets, and these are stored with absolute values (in pixels). No amount of fiddling will change that that is a very poor, inflexible design." Unless a dev corrects me, this bug will not be fixed. It will only go away when a replacement is enacted, or there is a complete redesign of the fundamental panel code architecture and assumptions. In the meantime, there are a number of workarounds in the discussion above, but for now, this paper cut will continue to bleed. Some workaround suggestions in the comments above: Comment #110 Comment #197 Comment #201 -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in Desktop panel for GNOME: Fix Released Status in One Hundred Paper Cuts: Triaged Status in “gnome-panel” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in “gnome-panel” source package in Hardy: Triaged Bug description: The items on the gnome panel is disordered in some cases, one of these being changing the screen reolution, possibly other, more random, cases as well. - Temporary solution: Backup the state of your panel: gconftool-2 --dump /apps/panel panel_backup.xml and then restore it whenever it gets messed up: gconftool-2 --load panel_backup.xml killall gnome-panel (kills and auto-respawns, possibly need to run gnome-panel & as well) - I have noticed for a while now that the above-mentioned phenomenon occurs when I, say, return from a shut-down. However, the strange thing is that it only happens on some occations. I don't really know what the problem is, so I can't, unfortunately, post more information. To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-panel/+bug/44082/+subscribe -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparentlyrandomly on session start in some situations
Yeah but awn I noted doesn't always work with some applications. Like I have a windows app installed under wine and the shortcut I place on my desktop won't work in awn. It does that thing where the icon will move telling you the pc is doing something and then everything stops (the pc wants you to forget you clicked on the icon) Only way it works is either on the desktop, from the menu, or from the panel. -Original Message- From: Sandro Mani <44...@bugs.launchpad.net> Sender: boun...@canonical.com Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:14:29 To: Reply-To: Bug 44082 <44...@bugs.launchpad.net> Subject: Re: [Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations or just play around with awn ;) On 10/25/2010 09:02 PM, sk8erbender wrote: > heh then im gonna change to lxde maybe peppermint ice or something ;) > -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in Desktop panel for GNOME: Fix Released Status in One Hundred Paper Cuts: Triaged Status in “gnome-panel” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in “gnome-panel” source package in Hardy: Triaged Bug description: The items on the gnome panel is disordered in some cases, one of these being changing the screen reolution, possibly other, more random, cases as well. - Temporary solution: Backup the state of your panel: gconftool-2 --dump /apps/panel panel_backup.xml and then restore it whenever it gets messed up: gconftool-2 --load panel_backup.xml killall gnome-panel (kills and auto-respawns, possibly need to run gnome-panel & as well) - I have noticed for a while now that the above-mentioned phenomenon occurs when I, say, return from a shut-down. However, the strange thing is that it only happens on some occations. I don't really know what the problem is, so I can't, unfortunately, post more information. To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-panel/+bug/44082/+subscribe -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparentlyrandomly on session start in some situations
I thought the general understanding was that this bug wasn't going to be fixed as the underlying architecture was going to be redone as gnome 3.0 will be released within the next year or so and will replace 2.26. I could be wrong though. -Original Message- From: Rafael García Sender: boun...@canonical.com Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 21:44:57 To: Reply-To: Bug 44082 <44...@bugs.launchpad.net> Subject: [Bug 44082] Re: GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations Will be fixed in maverick in some update? Because, as said Keith Allcock, gnome-panel version included is after to the fixed one. Perhaps is it fixed in debian packages and not in ubuntu packages already? -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in Desktop panel for GNOME: Fix Released Status in One Hundred Paper Cuts: Triaged Status in “gnome-panel” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in “gnome-panel” source package in Hardy: Triaged Bug description: The items on the gnome panel is disordered in some cases, one of these being changing the screen reolution, possibly other, more random, cases as well. - Temporary solution: Backup the state of your panel: gconftool-2 --dump /apps/panel panel_backup.xml and then restore it whenever it gets messed up: gconftool-2 --load panel_backup.xml killall gnome-panel (kills and auto-respawns, possibly need to run gnome-panel & as well) - I have noticed for a while now that the above-mentioned phenomenon occurs when I, say, return from a shut-down. However, the strange thing is that it only happens on some occations. I don't really know what the problem is, so I can't, unfortunately, post more information. To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-panel/+bug/44082/+subscribe -- GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
