[Bug 223954] Re: Brightness control still has major bugs
Regarding Toby's comment - The problems I have been experiencing (see bug description above) are also happening on a Dell E1505. -- Brightness control still has major bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223954 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 235635] Re: Graphical package managers slow system to halt
I have resolved this issue on my own machine and I think I have determined the cause. It seems to be related to the "sudo: unable to resolve host" issue. During the span of time that package managers were running slowly, I was receiving that message from sudo. After resolving that sudo issue, I noticed that not only package managers, but all other gksu applications which had been running slowly (like my backup application) had stopped locking up my machine and started working at a good speed once again. If you are interested, I discuss my findings in more detail in a different bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/235637/comments/2 ** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None => sudo -- Graphical package managers slow system to halt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235635 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223954] Re: Brightness control still has major bugs
There is another bug which doesn't seem to have been mentioned. Using the [Fn + Up] and [Fn + Dn] keystrokes changes the brightness in huge increments. The keystrokes basically allow me three separate brightness levels: very dim, medium, and very bright. By comparison, my Dell's sound buttons allow me to adjust the sound in very small increments, allowing me to access about 10 different volume levels. I wouldn't mark this bug as low priority, as I would be hesitant to argue that these problems are of low annoyance to any user. Can we get some of these issues fixed for Intrepid? -- Brightness control still has major bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223954 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223954] Re: Brightness control still has major bugs
To quote https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance - Low: Bugs which affect functionality, but to a lesser extent than most bugs, examples are: * Ones that can be easily worked around * Ones that affect unusual configurations or uncommon hardware * A bug that has a moderate impact on a non-core application * A cosmetic/usability issue that does not limit the functionality of an application - I guess you could make the argument that this is a cosmetic issue, but that seems like a bit of a stretch. I mean, it's not like this is a bug in Compiz or anything like that. And the bugs certainly do not meet any of the other criteria to be considered Low priority. There is no known workaround to these bugs, let alone an easy workaround, this bug is not related to "unusual configurations" or "uncommon hardware", and this bug is related to core functionality. I would recommend that the priority of these bugs be changed to Medium as they have "a moderate impact on a core application". -- Brightness control still has major bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223954 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 235637] Re: Applications that require gksu privileges (Synaptic, Update Manager, etc) do not launch
Try applying the "fix" described in the following post. It worked for me and at least one other user: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=5068406&postcount=11 -- Applications that require gksu privileges (Synaptic, Update Manager, etc) do not launch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235637 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223954] Re: Brightness control still has major bugs
As bgcommon notes, the bug is easily triggered. Set your brightness to a certain level with the Brightness Applet. Alter the brightness with the [Fn + Up] or [Fn + Down] key. Close/reopen the laptop lid and the level will revert to that which had originally been set in the Brightness Applet. As you requested, here are the results of the commands. The commands were executed after setting the brightness with the Brightness Applet but before using the [Fn + *] key: gconftool -a /apps/gnome-power-manager/backlight idle_dim_battery = true idle_brightness = 30 dpms_method_battery = default dpms_method_ac = default idle_dim_time = 30 brightness_battery = 70 enable = true idle_dim_ac = false brightness_ac = 81 battery_reduce = true gnome-power-bugreport.sh Distro version: DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 8.04" Kernel version: 2.6.24-19-generic g-p-m version:2.22.1 HAL version: 0.5.11rc2 System manufacturer: missing System version: missing System product: missing AC adapter present: yes Battery present: yes Laptop panel present: yes CPU scaling present: yes Battery Information: battery.charge_level.current = 50116 (0xc3c4) (int) battery.charge_level.design = 53280 (0xd020) (int) battery.charge_level.last_full = 50116 (0xc3c4) (int) battery.charge_level.percentage = 100 (0x64) (int) battery.charge_level.rate = 11 (0xb) (int) battery.is_rechargeable = true (bool) battery.model = ' DELLUD2657' (string) battery.present = true (bool) battery.rechargeable.is_charging = false (bool) battery.rechargeable.is_discharging = false (bool) battery.reporting.current = 4800 (0x12c0) (int) battery.reporting.design = 4800 (0x12c0) (int) battery.reporting.last_full = 4515 (0x11a3) (int) battery.reporting.rate = 1 (0x1) (int) battery.reporting.technology = 'Li-ion' (string) battery.reporting.unit = 'mAh' (string) battery.technology = 'lithium-ion' (string) battery.type = 'primary' (string) battery.vendor = 'SMP' (string) battery.voltage.current = 12424 (0x3088) (int) battery.voltage.design = 11100 (0x2b5c) (int) battery.voltage.unit = 'mV' (string) GNOME Power Manager Process Information: john 7017 0.0 1.1 247184 11636 ?Ss 14:16 0:00 gnome-power-manager john 7109 0.0 1.0 225616 10816 ?S14:17 0:00 /usr/lib/gnome-power-manager/gnome-brightness-applet --oaf-activate-iid=OAFIID:GNOME_BrightnessApplet_Factory --oaf-ior-fd=36 HAL Process Information: 107 5669 0.0 0.4 40208 4828 ?Ss 14:13 0:03 /usr/sbin/hald root 5735 0.0 0.1 22048 1316 ?S14:13 0:00 \_ hald-runner root 5748 0.0 0.2 34628 2404 ?S14:13 0:00 \_ /usr/lib/hal/hald-addon-dell-backlight root 5749 0.0 0.1 24156 1296 ?S14:13 0:00 \_ hald-addon-input: Listening on /dev/input/event8 /dev/input/event10 /dev/input/event9 /dev/input/event1 /dev/input/event4 /dev/input/event5 /dev/input/event6 root 5759 0.0 0.1 24168 1324 ?S14:13 0:00 \_ /usr/lib/hal/hald-addon-cpufreq 107 5760 0.0 0.1 16672 1044 ?S14:13 0:00 \_ hald-addon-acpi: listening on acpid socket /var/run/acpid.socket root 5783 0.0 0.1 24156 1280 ?S14:13 0:00 \_ hald-addon-storage: polling /dev/scd0 (every 2 sec) -- Brightness control still has major bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223954 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 235985] Re: Strange ghosting/smearing rendering on a specific page
I can confirm on a Dell E1505n with "Intel 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller". This is a terribly, terrible annoying bug. Please fix it in a future update. -- Strange ghosting/smearing rendering on a specific page https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235985 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 235637] [NEW] Applications that require sudo privelages (Synaptic, Update Manager, etc) do not launch
Public bug reported: After attempting to launch any gksu application (Synaptic, Update Manager, GParted, etc), no password prompt appears. Instead, an item titled "Starting Administrative..." appears on the taskbar and ultimately disappears. Sometimes, launching the applications a second time works as expected. On other occasions, further attempts to launch the application only result in the same problem - no password prompt but a quiet failure of the application. Launching any of these applications in terminal - ex: sudo synaptic - seems to work perfectly well. Further discussion on ubuntuforums: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=5051546#post5051546 ** Affects: gksu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: After attempting to launch any gksu application (Synaptic, Update Manager, GParted, etc), no password prompt appears. Instead, an item titled "Starting Administrative..." appears on the taskbar and - ultimately disappears. Sometimes, attempting to launch the applications - a second time works. Other times, it does not. + ultimately disappears. Sometimes, launching the applications a second + time works as expected. On other occasions, further attempts to launch + the application only result in the same problem - no password prompt but + a quiet failure of the application. Launching any of these applications in terminal - ex: sudo synaptic - seems to work perfectly well. Further discussion on ubuntuforums: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=5051546#post5051546 -- Applications that require sudo privelages (Synaptic, Update Manager, etc) do not launch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235637 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 235635] [NEW] Graphical package managers slow system to halt
Public bug reported: Whenever I attempt to install or remove software from Synaptic, Update Manager, or gdebi-gtk my system slows to a halt. Everything becomes so slow that the system practically locks up and makes it impossible for me to do anything else, even move the mouse normally. For some reason, though using apt-get or gdebi from terminal works perfectly well, and does not slow down the rest of the system in any way. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Graphical package managers slow system to halt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235635 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 235642] [NEW] "Reported Attack Site" page: "Get me out of here!" button still directs to http://start.ubuntu.com/8.04/
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Steps to repeat: 1. Go to an attack site (ex. whitehouse.org) 2. Click "Get me out of here!" Result: You are directed to http://start.ubuntu.com/8.04/ (the page Hardy Heron had set as the homepage originally) Expected Result: You are directed to your current homepage ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - "Reported Attack Site" page: "Get me out of here!" button links to always directs to http://start.ubuntu.com/8.04/ + "Reported Attack Site" page: "Get me out of here!" button still directs to http://start.ubuntu.com/8.04/ ** Description changed: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 - - This bug only applies to the version of Firefox which can be installed - from Ubuntu's repositories, or which has been installed automatically in - Hardy Heron. Steps to repeat: 1. Go to an attack site (ex. whitehouse.org) 2. Click "Get me out of here!" Result: You are directed to http://start.ubuntu.com/8.04/ (the page Hardy Heron had set as the homepage originally) Expected Result: You are directed to your current homepage -- "Reported Attack Site" page: "Get me out of here!" button still directs to http://start.ubuntu.com/8.04/ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 235637] Re: Applications that require gksu privelages (Synaptic, Update Manager, etc) do not launch
** Summary changed: - Applications that require sudo privelages (Synaptic, Update Manager, etc) do not launch + Applications that require gksu privelages (Synaptic, Update Manager, etc) do not launch -- Applications that require gksu privelages (Synaptic, Update Manager, etc) do not launch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235637 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 235637] Re: Applications that require gksu privileges (Synaptic, Update Manager, etc) do not launch
I was able to find the cause of the bug, and would appreciate if someone can confirm this by following the steps below: Steps to reproduce: 1. Launch System > Administration > Network 2. Unlock the application if necessary 3. Click the "General" tab and add a domain (I tried to add the name of my home network, but any name would cause the same problem) 4. Hit close Expected result: sudo and gksu do not behave any differently Actual results: -gksu applications (such as Synaptic or GParted) either do not launch or must be started twice before they actually launch -Using sudo from terminal works, but produces the error message "sudo: unable to resolve host [computer name]" It's worth noting that after you add a domain name in the "General" tab of "Network Settings", that same domain name is appended to the alias of host 127.0.1.1 in the "Hosts" tab of "Network Settings". Also interesting is that I recently submitted a different bug to report that graphical package managers had been running incredibly slowly on my machine (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/235635). After fixing this network bug I have noticed that package managers no longer bring my machine to a halt. In fact, all other gksu applications (such as my backup application) which had been locking up my computer no longer do so. It appears that the dramatic slowdown I noticed in Synaptic and GDebi was not due to the fact that they were package managers, but due to the fact that they required gksu privileges. I would appreciate if anyone could confirm any of what I have discussed in this post. I would also appreciate if anyone could elaborate on the cause of my issues. I have provided and elaborated on the symptoms, but am not knowledgeable enough to determine the exact cause of this bug. -- Applications that require gksu privileges (Synaptic, Update Manager, etc) do not launch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235637 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 238730] [NEW] Cannot easily apply a tag to multiple webpages
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 It is not possible to tag multiple webpages at the same time. Steps to repeat: 1. Bookmarks > Organize Bookmarks... 2. In the left panel, double-click your "Bookmarks Menu" folder or any other folder 3. In the right panel, select multiple bookmarks (click first, shift-click last) Expected Result: The "Name" and "Location" fields of the bottom-right panel become disabled, but the "Tags" field is still usable Actual Result: The entire bottom-right panel (Name, Location, and Tags) disappears, making it impossible to apply a tag to all of the selected bookmarks. A little nitpicky, I know. But I, like most users of pre-3.0 versions, have organized my bookmarks in a folder structure. Now that Firefox has such a great tagging system, I would love to tag all of my bookmarks and (at least partially) do away with my folder structure. Because only one webpage can be tagged at a time, it would be far too time-consuming to do so. ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: New -- Cannot easily apply a tag to multiple webpages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238730 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222844] Re: "New Folder..." creates a new sibling folder, not a new subfolder
Seems that this bug is not in 3.0.5. I don't know specifically which update resolved this issue, but now folders are created as expected. ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- "New Folder..." creates a new sibling folder, not a new subfolder https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222844 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 235642] Re: "Reported Attack Site" page: "Get me out of here!" button still directs to http://start.ubuntu.com/8.04/
I am using Ubuntu 8.10 and Firefox 3.0.5 Could you give me the address of a "Reported Attack Site" (maybe a dummy page) so that I can test this? -- "Reported Attack Site" page: "Get me out of here!" button still directs to http://start.ubuntu.com/8.04/ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 310907] Re: [Intrepid] Dragging in Freecell Crashes XWindows
I can confirm this bug. I was playing Elevator in Aisleriot, and experienced the same issues that others are experiencing: screen froze momentarily while I was dragging a card, X crashed, X tried to restart and failed, computer needed hard shutdown. I would love to see this resolved as I think Aisleriot is excellent software. I'm not sure which logfiles would be useful, so please let me know and I will provide them. ** Changed in: xorg-server Status: New => Confirmed -- [Intrepid] Dragging in Freecell Crashes XWindows https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310907 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239620] [NEW] Property dialog of top folders displays the title "null"
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Steps to repeat: 1. Open the bookmarks sidebar (Ctrl + B) 2. Right click on "Bookmarks Toolbar" 3. Click "Properties" Expected result: A dialog appears with the following title: Properties for "Bookmarks Toolbar" Actual result: A dialog appears with the following title: Properties for "(null)" The same thing happens when the steps are repeated using the two other top folders, "Bookmarks Menu" and "Unsorted Bookmarks". For simplicity I stuck with one in the preceding summary. On a side note, I think a more grammatically logical title for the property dialog would be "Properties OF [item name]", but let's not be nitpicky :P ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Steps to repeat: 1. Open the bookmarks sidebar (Ctrl + B) 2. Right click on "Bookmarks Toolbar" 3. Click "Properties" Expected result: A dialog appears with the following title: Properties for "Bookmarks Toolbar" Actual result: A dialog appears with the following title: Properties for "(null)" The same thing happens when the steps are repeated using the two other top folders, "Bookmarks Menu" and "Unsorted Bookmarks". For simplicity I stuck with one in the preceding summary. - On a side note, I think the property dialog should use the title - "Properties OF [item name]", but let's not be nitpicky :P + On a side note, I think a more grammatically logical title for the + property dialog would be "Properties OF [item name]", but let's not be + nitpicky :P -- Property dialog of top folders displays the title "null" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239620 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239620] Re: Property dialog of top folders displays the title "null"
I created a second profile and made sure that no extensions (not even Ubufox) were enabled for that profile. The bug still exists even under those circumstances. -- Property dialog of top folders displays the title "null" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239620 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119836] Re: Latest version hungs after downloading new mail
Has there been any progress on this bug? I tried taking a look at the theme folder but I don't know anything about Mozilla theme development. Is there anyone with development experience who can try to track down the cause of this bug? It would be great to get my notifications working again. -- Latest version hungs after downloading new mail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222842] [NEW] Linux dropdown widgets are ugly
Public bug reported: The dropdown widget looks ugly (not GTK-ish) on the Linux version of Firefox 3 beta 5. See the following page, which contains several dropdown widgets near the top: http://art.gnome.org/themes/metacity/ A better look would be one that looks similar to the widget marked "New" in the image below (the image is a screenshot of a "Widget fix" package for Firefox 2 on Linux): http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/7093/scrollercomparisoniy8.png ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Tags: gtk widgets -- Linux dropdown widgets are ugly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222842 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222842] Re: Linux dropdown widgets are ugly
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13951994/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "pluginreg.dat.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13951995/pluginreg.dat.txt ** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13951996/profiles.ini.txt ** Attachment removed: "profiles.ini.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13951996/profiles.ini.txt ** Attachment removed: "pluginreg.dat.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13951995/pluginreg.dat.txt ** Attachment removed: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13951994/Dependencies.txt ** Description changed: - Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 - The dropdown widget looks ugly (not GTK-ish) on the Linux version of Firefox 3 beta 5. See the following page, which contains several dropdown widgets near the top: http://art.gnome.org/themes/metacity/ A better look would be one that looks similar to the widget marked "New" in the image below (the image is a screenshot of a "Widget fix" package for Firefox 2 on Linux): http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/7093/scrollercomparisoniy8.png - - ProblemType: Bug - Architecture: amd64 - Date: Sat Apr 26 20:47:35 2008 - DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 - Package: firefox-3.0 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 - PackageArchitecture: amd64 - ProcEnviron: - PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games - LANG=en_US.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/bash - SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 - Uname: Linux 2.6.24-16-generic x86_64 ** Tags added: gtk widgets ** Tags removed: apport-bug -- Linux dropdown widgets are ugly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222842 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222842] Re: Linux dropdown widgets are ugly
Marked as invalid. It appears that the ugliness is a result of that particular site's style. Other dropdown widgets (see http://www.google.com/advanced_search?hl=en) look fine. ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- Linux dropdown widgets are ugly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222842 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222844] [NEW] "New Folder..." creates a new sibling folder, not a new subfolder
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 This same behavior has existed in previous versions of Firefox, and has always seemed unnatural to me. Steps to repeat: 1. Do [Ctrl + B] to open up the bookmarks side pane 2. Expand "Bookmarks Menu" 3. Find an existing subfolder (let's call it FolderA) of "Bookmarks Menu" 4. Right click FolderA and then click "New Folder..." 5. Hit "Ok" on the dialog Expected result (most natural behavior): FolderA has a subfolder named "New Folder" Actual result: FolderA has a sibling folder (that is, a subfolder of "Bookmarks Menu") called "New Folder" This behavior seems unnatural, as most applications automatically create subfolders in such a situation. In fact, even Thunderbird will automatically create a subfolder if you repeat a similar process on a mail folder. ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: bookmarks folder ** Summary changed: - Doing [Right click > "New Folder..."] on a bookmark folder creates a new sibling folder, not a child folder as expected + "New Folder..." creates a new sibling folder, not a new child folder ** Summary changed: - "New Folder..." creates a new sibling folder, not a new child folder + "New Folder..." creates a new sibling folder, not a new subfolder ** Description changed: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 This same behavior has existed in previous versions of Firefox, and has always seemed unnatural to me. Steps to repeat: 1. Do [Ctrl + B] to open up the bookmarks side pane 2. Expand "Bookmarks Menu" 3. Find an existing subfolder (let's call it FolderA) of "Bookmarks Menu" 4. Right click FolderA and then click "New Folder..." 5. Hit "Ok" on the dialog Expected result (most natural behavior): - FolderA has a child folder named "New Folder" + FolderA has a subfolder named "New Folder" Actual result: FolderA has a sibling folder (that is, a subfolder of "Bookmarks Menu") called "New Folder" + + This behavior seems unnatural, as most applications automatically create + subfolders in such a situation. In fact, even Thunderbird will + automatically create a subfolder if you repeat a similar process on a + mail folder. ** Tags added: bookmarks folder -- "New Folder..." creates a new sibling folder, not a new subfolder https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222844 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222844] Re: "New Folder..." creates a new sibling folder, not a new subfolder
** Description changed: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 This same behavior has existed in previous versions of Firefox, and has always seemed unnatural to me. Steps to repeat: 1. Do [Ctrl + B] to open up the bookmarks side pane 2. Expand "Bookmarks Menu" 3. Find an existing subfolder (let's call it FolderA) of "Bookmarks Menu" 4. Right click FolderA and then click "New Folder..." 5. Hit "Ok" on the dialog Expected result (most natural behavior): - FolderA has a subfolder named "New Folder" + A new folder is created as a subfolder of FolderA Actual result: - FolderA has a sibling folder (that is, a subfolder of "Bookmarks Menu") called "New Folder" + A new folder is created as a sibling folder of FolderA (that is, a subfolder of "Bookmarks Menu") This behavior seems unnatural, as most applications automatically create subfolders in such a situation. In fact, even Thunderbird will automatically create a subfolder if you repeat a similar process on a mail folder. -- "New Folder..." creates a new sibling folder, not a new subfolder https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222844 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223954] [NEW] Brightness control still has major bugs
Public bug reported: gnome-power-manager and the brightness applet had some very annoying bugs in Gutsy (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome- power-manager/+bug/137598). For a while after upgrading to Hardy, it seemed as through the aforementioned bug had been resolved. I was able to adjust the screen brightness with [Fn + Up] and [Fn + Down] without issue. But now that I have been using Hardy for a few days, it seems that some of the bugs remain. Whenever I close/reopen my laptop lid, the brightness level changes. I have specified (through brightness applet) that the brightness should be at about 80%. But if after closing/reopening the laptop lid, the brightness level changes to about 20% and I must use either the Fn keys or Brightness Applet to revert the brightness to 80%. I have not done any extensive testing, and thus cannot provide with certainty a "Steps to reproduce" section. But it is clear that something is wrong, as the brightness level should not modify itself when I close my laptop lid. If anyone can confirm similar buggy activity or would like to provide any other relevant information, please do so in the comments section. ** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Brightness control still has major bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223954 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223954] Re: Brightness control still has major bugs
I'm not sure if it is technically the same bug. That is, I don't know that it is caused by the same code or even the same package. -- Brightness control still has major bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223954 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223954] Re: Brightness control still has major bugs
** Description changed: gnome-power-manager and the brightness applet had some very annoying bugs in Gutsy (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome- power-manager/+bug/137598). For a while after upgrading to Hardy, it seemed as through the aforementioned bug had been resolved. I was able to adjust the screen brightness with [Fn + Up] and [Fn + Down] without issue. But now that I have been using Hardy for a few days, it seems that some of the bugs - remain. Whenever I close/reopen my laptop lid, the brightness level - changes. I have specified (through brightness applet) that the - brightness should be at about 80%. But if after closing/reopening the - laptop lid, the brightness level changes to about 20% and I must use - either the Fn keys or Brightness Applet to revert the brightness to 80%. + remain. If I set my brightness via the Brightness Applet, the chosen + brightness will change after I close/reopen my laptop lid. However, if I + use the [Fn + Up] and [FN + Down] keystrokes, the brightness will be + "saved" until the computer restarts. Once the computer restarts, the + brightness level returns to a level different from the level set with + [Fn + Up] or [Fn + Down]. I have not done any extensive testing, and thus cannot provide with certainty a "Steps to reproduce" section. But it is clear that something is wrong, as the brightness level should not modify itself when I close my laptop lid. If anyone can confirm similar buggy activity or would like to provide any other relevant information, please do so in the comments section. -- Brightness control still has major bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223954 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137598] Re: Screen brightness resets to default (maximum) on idle with AC plugged in
Hardy fixed some of these issues, but introduced more at the same time. I haven't done extensive testing, but I can provide you with my observations. In Gutsy, I had the following problem. If I set the brightness with the [Fn + Up] or [Fn + Down] keystroke, the brightness would at some point revert to the value set in the Brightness Applet. In Hardy, it seems that the opposite happens. If I set the brightness with the Brightness Applet, it will at some point revert to the value set by the [Fn + Up] or [Fn + Down] keystroke. Worse, the brightness level always reverts to some (seemingly random) value after a reboot. I opened up a new bug to discuss the new problems (feel free to mark it a duplicate if you think that would be appropriate): https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/223954 ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Incomplete -- Screen brightness resets to default (maximum) on idle with AC plugged in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159353] Re: "Send to..." does not work
You're right, it now works. Thank you for pointing that out. I'm going to change the status to "Fix Released", assuming that an update resolved this problem. If you think it should have a different status, such as "Invalid", feel free to change it. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- "Send to..." does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159353 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 155485] Re: Brightness is automatically readjusted to match Brightness Applet
** Description changed: OS: Ubuntu Gutsy amd64 Hardware: Dell Inspiron E1505n (can provide specific details if necessary) I use the Brightness Applet to set the brightness to a specific value (let's just say 75%). I later use [Fn + Down Arrow] to lower the - brightness to be below 75%. Within a few minutes, the brightness - automatically reverts to 75%, the level originally set by the Brightness - Applet. - - I can't determine the frequency. It seems that the Brightness will only - revert to the level set in Brightness Applet once per boot, and that any - [Fn + Down] modifications made after that will not revert. + brightness to be below 75%. After a seemingly random amount of time, the + brightness automatically reverts back to 75%, the level originally set + by the Brightness Applet. Sometimes it takes 20+ minutes for the + brightness to revert, sometimes less than 5 - as I said it seems like it + happens after a completely random amount of time. ** Description changed: OS: Ubuntu Gutsy amd64 Hardware: Dell Inspiron E1505n (can provide specific details if necessary) I use the Brightness Applet to set the brightness to a specific value (let's just say 75%). I later use [Fn + Down Arrow] to lower the brightness to be below 75%. After a seemingly random amount of time, the brightness automatically reverts back to 75%, the level originally set by the Brightness Applet. Sometimes it takes 20+ minutes for the - brightness to revert, sometimes less than 5 - as I said it seems like it - happens after a completely random amount of time. + brightness to revert, sometimes less than 5 - as I said it seems to be + completely random and not caused by any other action or event. -- Brightness is automatically readjusted to match Brightness Applet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 146612] Re: K3b in Gnome DE in 7.04 and upgrading to Gutsy beta puts 3 kcmshell settings in menu "other" and confuses user to their meaning.
** Changed in: k3b (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- K3b in Gnome DE in 7.04 and upgrading to Gutsy beta puts 3 kcmshell settings in menu "other" and confuses user to their meaning. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 155485] Re: Brightness is automatically readjusted to match Brightness Applet
** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None => gnome-panel -- Brightness is automatically readjusted to match Brightness Applet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59695] Re: High frequency of load/unload cycles on some hard disks may shorten lifetime
@maor and Mathieu HAVEL If you are interested in getting Dell to replace affected hard drives, you may wish to promote this idea on Ideastorm: http://www.ideastorm.com/article/show/75651/Replace_worn_hard_drives_of_Ubuntu_PCs It requests that Dell replace not only hard drives that die from this bug, but also hard drives that are greatly affected before a fix is implemented. In my case, my hard drive accumulated more than 450,000 load cycles before I applied the fix, so I think it and other drives like it deserves to be replaced. -- High frequency of load/unload cycles on some hard disks may shorten lifetime https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 155485] Re: Brightness is automatically readjusted to match Brightness Applet
confirmed by user cornbread ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Brightness is automatically readjusted to match Brightness Applet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 87768] Re: soundconverter stops when output folder's name has spaces
** Changed in: soundconverter (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- soundconverter stops when output folder's name has spaces https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/87768 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137598] Re: Screen brightness resets to default (maximum) on idle with AC plugged in
I don't know anything about gconf, but I am certain that this problem only happens to me when I use hotkeys. I discussed this matter in the following post, under the section "Steps to repeat issue 1": https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/155485/comments/1 -- Screen brightness resets to default (maximum) on idle with AC plugged in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137598] Re: Screen brightness resets to default (maximum) on idle with AC plugged in
@Jochem - As far as I know, the applet has never been a problem. At least I have never experienced any problems with the brightness applet. The problem for me has always been, and continues to be, the hotkeys (I am not running any of the patches, I'm still on Gutsy). -- Screen brightness resets to default (maximum) on idle with AC plugged in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion.
** Summary changed: - Launchers under "System => Preferences" and "System => Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion. + Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion. -- Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion.
Thanks for really getting involved with resolving this issue. How would I go about applying your patch, and how could I revert the changes should I need to? Thanks alot. -- Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion.
I think that it would be best to remove "Software Sources" because that application can be easily reached from Synaptic. Most of the people who use "Software Sources" probably already use Synaptic, so it is a bit redundant. But if "Software Sources" has to stay, I would agree that a submenu would be the way to go. After all, there is an "Accessibility" submenu even though there are only two launchers of that type. It seems that having 3 or more similar items would certainly warrant a submenu. -- Launchers under "System > Preferences" and "System > Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137598] Re: Screen brightness resets to default (maximum) on idle with AC plugged in
It would really be a shame if this bug made it into Hardy, considering Hardy will be and LTS. LTS releases are supposed to solve problems just like this one. -- Screen brightness resets to default (maximum) on idle with AC plugged in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under "System => Preferences" and "System => Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion.
I'd be more than willing to help you out with this one if would like some help. I don't know the technical aspects of GNOME or anything like that, but I am ridiculously organized. If you need help cleaning up the names, descriptions, and overall organization of everything I would definitely be able to contribute to that. -- Launchers under "System => Preferences" and "System => Administration" have similar names, leads to confusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158343] Re: Screen dims and brightens randomly
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 137598 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137598 @ali_deren - Yes, use the brightness applet (right click on a panel > click add to panel > select the brightness applet) to control brightness. Only the brightness applet "fastens" the brightness level. -- Screen dims and brightens randomly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158343 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 155485] Re: Brightness is automatically readjusted to match Brightness Applet
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 137598 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137598 Is there any chance that this bug can be fixed before Hardy? It seems that Karsten has provided some useful information. -- Brightness is automatically readjusted to match Brightness Applet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1761995] Re: Error Formatting luks device
I can confirm that this fix works on Ubuntu 20.04. To reiterate: sudo apt install libblockdev-crypto2 sudo service udisks2 restart -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1761995 Title: Error Formatting luks device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/udisks/+bug/1761995/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1833017] [NEW] [needs-packaging] nativefier
Public bug reported: I would like to request that nativefier be packaged for Ubuntu. It can already be installed via npm (npm install -g nativefier), but I prefer to manage all of my global system packages in one place. I see that many node packages are already packaged for Ubuntu. Nativefier allows users to install websites as native applications. It's covered widely in Ubuntu fan blogs. NPM homepage: https://www.npmjs.com/package/nativefier GitHub project: https://github.com/jiahaog/nativefier Some sample blog coverage: https://www.fossmint.com/nativefier-make-website-into-desktop-app/ https://www.addictivetips.com/ubuntu-linux-tips/nativefier-turn-websites-into-linux-apps/ https://medium.com/@kevinhowbrook/build-an-ubuntu-web-app-in-about-5-seconds-with-nativefier-f02ca5942e28 https://brockhatfield.com/make-website-app-nativefier/ https://www.leowkahman.com/2018/03/22/running-whatsapp-allo-todoist-onenote-on-ubuntu/ ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833017 Title: [needs-packaging] nativefier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1833017/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 776836] Re: Pressing on the "Subscribe" button to download my purchased music didn't work.
Still seeing this in 12.10. Unable to use the workaround in comment #13 as I get an IPCError whenever I try to use the Ubuntu One client. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776836 Title: Pressing on the "Subscribe" button to download my purchased music didn't work. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libubuntuone/+bug/776836/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 331369] Re: regression vs. notification-daemon: positioning when multiple screens are available
Does not work as described (If any windows are open, a bubble should appear...) for me. I am on 12.04 and have not applied the modification mentioned in comment #104. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331369 Title: regression vs. notification-daemon: positioning when multiple screens are available To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/331369/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 776836] Re: Pressing on the "Subscribe" button to download my purchased music didn't work.
Surprised that this bug has still not been resolved. It seems to be impossible to download music from Ubuntu One as a result. The workaround described in comment #9 doesn't work for me. Is there any other workaround we could try? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776836 Title: Pressing on the "Subscribe" button to download my purchased music didn't work. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libubuntuone/+bug/776836/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 776836] Re: Pressing on the "Subscribe" button to download my purchased music didn't work.
Console output with Rhythmbox on 12.04: $ rhythmbox (rhythmbox:3189): libdmapsharing-WARNING **: DACP browsing not started (rhythmbox:3189): libdmapsharing-WARNING **: DACP browsing not started ** (rhythmbox:3189): WARNING **: Error calling get_info: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken. ** (rhythmbox:3189): CRITICAL **: syncdaemon_folder_info_get_subscribed: assertion `SYNCDAEMON_IS_FOLDER_INFO (finfo)' failed ** (rhythmbox:3189): WARNING **: Error calling get_info: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken. ** (rhythmbox:3189): CRITICAL **: syncdaemon_folder_info_get_volume_id: assertion `SYNCDAEMON_IS_FOLDER_INFO (finfo)' failed ** (rhythmbox:3189): CRITICAL **: syncdaemon_folders_interface_subscribe: assertion `folder_id != NULL' failed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776836 Title: Pressing on the "Subscribe" button to download my purchased music didn't work. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libubuntuone/+bug/776836/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 923876] Re: FR: Limit and clean-up kernel images and headers automatically in LTS
On Quantal, this does not appear to solve the problem described in bug #1131512. My boot partition still becomes full after some kernel upgrades. If not handled before the next reboot, this can make the system un-bootable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923876 Title: FR: Limit and clean-up kernel images and headers automatically in LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/923876/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 923876] Re: FR: Limit and clean-up kernel images and headers automatically in LTS
Still have this issue on a fresh install of Raring. And as others say, this is especially problematic for those of us with an encrypted setup, as the /boot partition fills up very quickly, causing software upgrades to fail. This problem can only be solved by manually removing old kernels, and I suspect the average user will not think to do this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923876 Title: FR: Limit and clean-up kernel images and headers automatically in LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/923876/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
