[Bug 247207] Re: zabbix-agent init script error
Same here too -- oddly enough, that did not always prevent zabbix-agent from running. On one machine I manually did a cd /var/run sudo mv zabbix-server zabbix-agent and started zabbix-agent. On another machine that seems to have happened by itself. Dirk -- zabbix-agent init script error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247207 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234837] [NEW] Binutils corrupts Open MPI
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: binutils
I think I found a bad bug in hardy. I do not know what it is, but I can pin
it down. It involves Open MPI when used with R via the Rmpi add-on package
for R. And I think it points to the toolchain, hence filed against binutils.
This may
of course need re-assignment.
What you need installed comes via
$ sudo apt-get install r-cran-rmpi
At a minimal level, you can try this (here running on my Debian testing box)
where we load the Rmpi add-on into R (thus dyn.loading libopenmpi1) and then
just showing a simple hello world:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo 'library(Rmpi); cat("Still alive\n")' | R --slave
Still alive
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
On hardy with default packages:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo 'library(Rmpi); cat("Still alive\n")' | R --slave
[joe:29084] *** Process received signal ***
[joe:29084] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
[joe:29084] Signal code: Address not mapped (1)
[joe:29084] Failing at address: 0x8c92004
[joe:29084] [ 0] [0xe440]
[joe:29084] [ 1] /usr/lib/libopen-pal.so.0(free+0xc4) [0xb744cae4]
[joe:29084] [ 2] /usr/lib/libopen-pal.so.0 [0xb7432d3e]
[joe:29084] [ 3] /usr/lib/libopen-pal.so.0 [0xb74328ea]
[joe:29084] [ 4] /usr/lib/libopen-pal.so.0(lt_dlforeachfile+0x3d) [0xb74329dd]
[joe:29084] [ 5] /usr/lib/libopen-pal.so.0(mca_base_component_find+0x327)
[0xb743b1d7]
[joe:29084] [ 6] /usr/lib/libopen-pal.so.0(mca_base_components_open+0x18a)
[0xb743bbca]
[joe:29084] [ 7] /usr/lib/libopen-pal.so.0(opal_timer_base_open+0x7b)
[0xb7451d6b]
[joe:29084] [ 8] /usr/lib/libopen-pal.so.0(opal_init+0xcb) [0xb743066b]
[joe:29084] [ 9] /usr/lib/libmpi.so.0(ompi_mpi_init+0x19) [0xb751b2b9]
[joe:29084] [10] /usr/lib/libmpi.so.0(MPI_Init+0x18f) [0xb753e62f]
[joe:29084] [11]
/usr/lib/R/site-library/Rmpi/libs/Rmpi.so(mpi_initialize+0x54) [0xb7574154]
[joe:29084] [12] /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so [0xb7ce1c1d]
[joe:29084] [13] /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so(Rf_eval+0x714) [0xb7d08d64]
[joe:29084] [14] /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so [0xb7d098af]
[joe:29084] [15] /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so(Rf_eval+0x542) [0xb7d08b92]
[joe:29084] [16] /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so [0xb7d0aacf]
[joe:29084] [17] /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so(Rf_eval+0x451) [0xb7d08aa1]
[joe:29084] [18] /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so [0xb7d0a0b0]
[joe:29084] [19] /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so(Rf_eval+0x451) [0xb7d08aa1]
[joe:29084] [20] /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so(Rf_applyClosure+0x2ac) [0xb7d0c0fc]
[joe:29084] [21] /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so(Rf_eval+0x349) [0xb7d08999]
[joe:29084] [22] /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so [0xb7d0ab52]
[joe:29084] [23] /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so(Rf_eval+0x451) [0xb7d08aa1]
[joe:29084] [24] /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so [0xb7d0a0b0]
[joe:29084] [25] /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so(Rf_eval+0x451) [0xb7d08aa1]
[joe:29084] [26] /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so [0xb7d0ab52]
[joe:29084] [27] /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so(Rf_eval+0x451) [0xb7d08aa1]
[joe:29084] [28] /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so [0xb7d0a0b0]
[joe:29084] [29] /usr/lib/R/lib/libR.so(Rf_eval+0x451) [0xb7d08aa1]
[joe:29084] *** End of error message ***
Segmentation fault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l r-base-core libopenmpi1 r-cran-rmpi
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-f/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/t-aWait/T-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version
Description
+++-==-==-
ii libopenmpi11.2.5-1ubuntu1
high performance message passing library -- shared library
ii r-base-core2.6.2-2
GNU R core of statistical computing language and environment
ii r-cran-rmpi0.5-5-1
GNU R package interfacing MPI libraries for distributed computing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Now, at work (using Ubuntu) I tend to just fetch from Debian sources via
apt-get source and rebuild locally. This failed when I recently rebuilt
libopenmpi1 -- but it worked with a package I rebuilt in early April. I had
chased the bug for a day or two, emailed Rmpi upstream -- no luck.
Now I just took the _exact same sources for openmpi_ and rebuilt on a Gutsy
7.10 machine that a colleague hadn't upgraded yet -- and it works.
The only difference was that I removed the Build-Depends on libibverbs-dev as
we don't have Infiniband yet. And just to be sure, I also rebuilt with
libibverbs-dev and it also works. All three packages are pristine -- I am
Debian maintainer for all three. The __only change vector is Ubuntu 7.10
versus 8.04__.
I suspect that the default Ubuntu builds now strip something they didn't used
to. Do you have any insight? For that matter libopenmpi1 has three
[Bug 248150] Re: package r-cran-fcalendar 220.10063-1 failed to install/upgrade:
On 6 August 2008 at 12:53, Luca Falavigna wrote: | Will this SRU involve 32 source packages? Impossible to say. Actually may be best. Worst-case is 32, yes. | Does fix from Debian 410951 solve this issue? Maybe. You'll need to test -- we don't usually have upgrades skipping several releases. Also note that I wasn't the maintainer for #410952. Dirk | -- | package r-cran-fcalendar 220.10063-1 failed to install/upgrade: | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248150 | You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber | of the bug. -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- package r-cran-fcalendar 220.10063-1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248150 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 248150] Re: package r-cran-fcalendar 220.10063-1 failed to install/upgrade:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 01:14:17PM -, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 6 August 2008 at 12:53, Luca Falavigna wrote: > | Will this SRU involve 32 source packages? > > Impossible to say. Actually may be best. Worst-case is 32, yes. Sorry: "Actually may be best to test." is what I meant to write. D. > > | Does fix from Debian 410951 solve this issue? > > Maybe. You'll need to test -- we don't usually have upgrades skipping several > releases. Also note that I wasn't the maintainer for #410952. > > Dirk > > | -- > | package r-cran-fcalendar 220.10063-1 failed to install/upgrade: > | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248150 > | You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > | of the bug. > > -- > Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. > > -- > package r-cran-fcalendar 220.10063-1 failed to install/upgrade: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248150 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- package r-cran-fcalendar 220.10063-1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248150 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182112] Re: ess new version available
ESS is now again actively maintained in Debian; I am part of the maintainer group. We'd be happy for someone from Ubuntu to join. Just email us. Regards, Dirk -- ess new version available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 234837] Re: Binutils corrupts Open MPI
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 07:30:25PM -, Cesare Tirabassi wrote: > ** Also affects: openmpi (Ubuntu) >Importance: Undecided >Status: New > > ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) >Status: New => Invalid > > ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Hardy) >Status: New => Invalid Care to explain? As my bug report stated, the _only_ change was the Gutsy/Hardy upgrade as I compiled the _same sources_. This is no Open MPI bug. This is a toolchain bug that happens to break Open MPI. Dirk > > -- > Binutils corrupts Open MPI > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234837 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- Binutils corrupts Open MPI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234837 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234837] Re: Binutils corrupts Open MPI
On 15 June 2008 at 19:53, Steffen Neumann wrote: | I can add that the problem has been introduced somewhere | within the hardy development time. We have a machine | that has been installed around february/march with a then-current hardy. | This includes a working OpenMPI package. The update to the released hardy | broke openMPI. Yes, exactly what I observerd too. | Yours, | Steffen | | (Whose bugs 210273 and 224706 have been marked a duplicate of this). | So if this bug is "invalid" I'd like to know if someone is working on any of | the other two. I am as stunned by this as Steffen and am eagerly awaiting an explanation. Dirk who happens to co-maintain Open MPI in Debian and suspects that Open MPI is not at fault here but rather how the package was built for Hardy / whatever changed for the compilers / linkers / ... in hardy as _the same source package built on Gutsy_ works for me. | Yours, | Steffen | | -- | Binutils corrupts Open MPI | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234837 | You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber | of the bug. -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- Binutils corrupts Open MPI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234837 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234837] Re: Binutils corrupts Open MPI
Cesare, Thanks for your mail! On 15 June 2008 at 20:53, Cesare Tirabassi wrote: | I still have not received any answer to my emails (Friday 13 June @12:22:46 CEST and Sunday 15 June @21:25:20 CEST). I replied to your email from Friday on Friday right when I got, ie before leaving for work: From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cesare Tirabassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: SUSPECT: Re: [Rd] Rmpi segfault after install on Ubuntu Hardy Heron Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:27:37 -0500 and exim4 had no issues as far as I can see 2008-06-13 07:27:37 1K78NV-00078e-Jd <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] U=edd P=local S=1869 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-13 07:27:39 1K78NV-00078e-Jd => [EMAIL PROTECTED] R=smarthost T=remote_smtp_smarthost H=smtp.g.comcast.net [76.96.30.117] X=TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32 DN="C=US,ST=Pennsylvania,L=Philadelphia,O=Comcast Cable Communications Management LLC,OU=Business Center,CN=smtp.comcast.net" 2008-06-13 07:27:39 1K78NV-00078e-Jd Completed Did you get that or not? Today I only received (automated) Launchpad messages from you but no direct mail. I did send you one given that I had not heard from you. Looks like there may be email troubles at your end? Just to be sure, I added both you email addresses as CC. | In summary, this is apparently caused by compiling openmpi with -Wl ,-Bsymbolic-functions (default from latest dpkg-buildpackage). If it is dpkg-buildpackages, it would 'hit' us too as we're building in unstable. So I think it may be something else. Could it be that Ubuntu has a different GCC default in stripping symbols or something? The first person I talked to about this was doko but is always so overwhelmed that he told me to please file a bug report which I did. Which promptly got ignored by everybody. | This could possibly be due to any of the three libopenmpi1 different interrelated libraries sharing symbols? That was my immediate gut reaction as well. But that is a design choice Open MPI made upstream, and "we" (as in Debian's Open MPI maintainer) do not fight it. *If* you guys changed build options, I'd start by reverting to what we do. But if you guys changed nothing, well then I am at a loss. | Can you and/or Manuel comment on this before we release a fix? [ CCing Manuel who you forgot to CC. ] Sure. Let's hash this out for a moment to get it right. Manuel may want to comment as I may well have overlooked or forgotten something. Dirk | ** Changed in: openmpi (Ubuntu Intrepid) |Status: New => Incomplete | | -- | Binutils corrupts Open MPI | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234837 | You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber | of the bug. -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- Binutils corrupts Open MPI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234837 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234837] Re: Binutils corrupts Open MPI
Just back in from a long run...
On 15 June 2008 at 22:49, Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
| Well, by looking at your buildd build log your default LDFLAGS is ""
| while we do use -Wl,-Bsymbolic.
That'll do to break the package, I suppose!
| I guess you never received my emails as
| I was explaining that in details.
That email lossage is a side issue we should take up on the side. Any idea
why I am not getting yours / your not getting mine?
| Anyhow, compiling unexporting LDFLAGS
| in debian/rules works as expected:
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/root/debian# echo 'library(Rmpi); cat("Still alive\n")' |
| R --slave
| [norsetto:13561] mca: base: components_open: component timer / linux open
| function failed
| [norsetto:13561] mca: base: component_find: unable to open osc pt2pt: file
not
| found (ignored)
| libibverbs: Fatal: couldn't read uverbs ABI version.
| --
| [0,0,0]: OpenIB on host norsetto was unable to find any HCAs.
| Another transport will be used instead, although this may result in
| lower performance.
| --
| Still alive
Perfect. And if you uncomment the line saying "btl = ^openib" in
/etc/openmpi/openmpi-mca-params.conf as in
# Disable the use of InfiniBand
# btl = ^openib
btl = ^openib
you will suppress the noise telling you that you have no IB hardware... This
has now been improved upstream, by the way.
| The above is with the patched and rebuilt 1.2.5-1.
Yes, look good! Thanks for that!
| You seem to confirm that upstream decided to share symbols between
| libraries, it is therefore a design choice and not a bug; I'm therefore
| happy to release this fix for intrepid right now. For hardy we need an
| sru, for which we need cooperation from you and possibly others since we
| need at least 3 persons to test and confirm this works (and doesn't
| break anything else) before we can make it official.
Let me know how I can help. As I said, same code / same everything but built
on Gutsy (ie without -Wl,-Bsymbolic) works.
| I'll work on this first thing tomorrow morning.
Much appreciated. This seems to have bitten a few people, and is too obscure
for most to figure out by themselves.
Dirk
| --
| Binutils corrupts Open MPI
| https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234837
| You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
| of the bug.
--
Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions.
--
Binutils corrupts Open MPI
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234837
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 234837] Re: Binutils corrupts Open MPI
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 01:31:53PM -, ilmarw wrote: > I know, but I find it annoying to having to edit /etc/openmpi/openmpi- > mca-params.conf, and since it is disabled in openmpi i newer versions it > could as well be removed. "Our" (as in Debian Open MPI maintainers in discussion with upstream) consensus was that it is still preferable to have the 'meep' rather than to disable IB for those who actually have the hardware. Luckily that is all somewhat moot now as the code will behave better going forward and deal with this autoMAGICally. Dirk -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- Binutils corrupts Open MPI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234837 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 68452] Re: jpilot-syncmal trashes Avantgo settings after Edgy update
I can confirm this -- same buggy behavior on my Edgy/6.06 system that has been upgraded continuously via the previous two release. Advice on how to fix this, or how to workaround it, would be welcome. Dirk -- jpilot-syncmal trashes Avantgo settings after Edgy update https://launchpad.net/bugs/68452 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219245] Re: libRblas missing in r-base 64 bit HARDY
First off, where do you get R from: Ubuntu or CRAN or self-built? Which
version? What does 'ldd /usr/lib/R/bin/exec/R' say?
I suspect you are simply mixing a 'newer' R build with an older r-cran-*
package expecting the older Blas / Lapack / Atlas setup.
If I were you, I'd uninstall r-cran-kernsmooth, restart R (under sudo) and say
install.packages("kernSmooth")
Hope this helps,
Dirk
Debian R maintainer
--
libRblas missing in r-base 64 bit HARDY
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219245
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 93924] Re: rpy package missing files
Updating to Debian package 1.0-rc1-4 (dated Dec 27, 2006) will fix this as RPy then recognises R 2.4.1. While at it, update to 1.0-rc1-5 which fixes an annoying bug with x11 updates occassionally crashing rpy. Dirk (R/Rpy maintainer for Debian) -- rpy package missing files https://launchpad.net/bugs/93924 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 68452] Re: jpilot-syncmal trashes Avantgo settings after Edgy update
On 4 December 2006 at 08:26, John McCreesh wrote: | I've had an email from Jason Day: | | "I believe I've got this fixed now. I can't send you a binary, but if | you are comfortable building packages from source here is where you can | download a preview: | | http://jasonday.home.att.net/code/syncmal/jpilot-syncmal-0.73pre.tar.gz | | "You will need to have the development packages installed for gtk and | pilot-link (and maybe libpisock) to build it. If you get it working, | please let me know. | | "I'll get this cleaned up and released on my site soon, but I don't know | how long it will take to make it into ubuntu's package repository." | | Since reporting this bug I've bought a Palm TX which uses a WiFi link to | synch with Avantgo, so I can't test whether this fix works. If someone | could test it and report back here, I can pass the message on to Jason. | | Thanks - John Thanks for the heads-up, and to Jason for the updated. I just applied the debian/ directory from the current package to these new sources, rebuilt it and installed the resulting .deb on my Ubuntu machine. Works like a charm. Thanks to all, Dirk -- Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. -- Thomas A. Edison -- jpilot-syncmal trashes Avantgo settings after Edgy update https://launchpad.net/bugs/68452 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 426360] Re: [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever
Thanks for the bug report and fix -- I concur. This was an oversight, and we will apply the promptly. Thanks also to whoever subscribed me to this today Dirk -- [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 426360] Re: [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever
Thanks for the bug report and fix -- I concur. This was an oversight, and we will apply the fix promptly. Thanks also to whoever subscribed me to this today Dirk -- [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 444639] [NEW] Unsuccessful grub2 install in amd64 alternate iso for karmic as of Oct 5
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub2 Using a current amd64 'alternate installer' downloaded yesterday (Oct 5) I had an unsuccessful installation using (hardware) raid and lvm2. The grub2 stage never complete, control went to the foreground menu. Lilo was also unsuccessful. As result, the system was left 'unbootable' as no boot loader was installed. Unfortunately, I have no logs to show as I then used the 9.04 'alternate installer' for amd64 and installed. It still uses grub and did not show this bug. The only (weak) lead I have is that the default volume is quirky: /dev/mapper/isw_cfbjie_Volume05 225806 14822198937 7% /boot Let me know if I can help with something else. Dirk ** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Unsuccessful grub2 install in amd64 alternate iso for karmic as of Oct 5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444639 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 444639] [NEW] Unsuccessful grub2 install in amd64 alternate iso for karmic as of Oct 5
On 6 October 2009 at 15:39, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | Public bug reported: | | Binary package hint: grub2 | | Using a current amd64 'alternate installer' downloaded yesterday (Oct 5) | I had an unsuccessful installation using (hardware) raid and lvm2. | | The grub2 stage never complete, control went to the foreground menu. | Lilo was also unsuccessful. | | As result, the system was left 'unbootable' as no boot loader was | installed. | | Unfortunately, I have no logs to show as I then used the 9.04 'alternate | installer' for amd64 and installed. It still uses grub and did not show | this bug. | | The only (weak) lead I have is that the default volume is quirky: | | /dev/mapper/isw_cfbjie_Volume05 | 225806 14822198937 7% /boot | | Let me know if I can help with something else. FakeRAID is the culprit. After Dustin patiently explained to me that friends don't let friends to FakeRAID, I jsut redid the install using the same iso and all is well now. Took me a while til I had the manual partioning right. But all is well with the Karmic Koala beta as of yesterday ... unless you use FakeRAID / Sata RAID / Bios RAID. From the kernel it is fine. Dirk PS But now SMART Data is telling me the new disk may be failing. Bought three days ago. Sigh. | Dirk | | ** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu) | Importance: Undecided | Status: New | | -- | Unsuccessful grub2 install in amd64 alternate iso for karmic as of Oct 5 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444639 | You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber | of the bug. -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- Unsuccessful grub2 install in amd64 alternate iso for karmic as of Oct 5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444639 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 426360] Re: [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever
On 25 September 2009 at 21:34, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | On 25 September 2009 at 22:35, Colin Watson wrote: | | On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 05:14:19PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > On 25 September 2009 at 21:55, Colin Watson wrote: | | Although I didn't change it for this upload since I wanted to discuss it | | with you, I think that for Karmic it would be a good idea to put the | | dependencies back the way they were before 2.9.2-2ubuntu1~ppa2, even if | | they need to stay otherwise in your PPA; do you disagree? In particular, | | if the dpkg dependencies are left the way they are at the moment then it | | will be possible for partial upgrades to go wrong, AFAICS. I'd rather | | give correct dependencies in Karmic precedence over installability on | | Jaunty, at least for packages in the main archive. | | Concretely, we are talking about | - support for libreadline-dev (to get libreadline6) | - support for dpkg triggers (hence the dpkg >= requirement) | | I agree. My short-term convenience should not matter. I can always rebuild on | Jaunty. | | So that would mean another ~ppa$X upload, right? | | Dirk, out of town at the kid's soccer tournament but with ssh access A new build (r-base_2.9.2-2ubuntu1~ppa4_source.changes) just went to the PPA, sole change was to re-enable the current Debian Policy / Karmic changes for the libreadline-dev switch and the versioned dpkg Depends to rely on triggers. Source upload, so no .deb packages here and no debdiff to attach. Sorry. Scott R and Scott K: If you could do you two-step once more 2.9.2-2ubuntu1~ppa4 then we we should be in great shape. Dirk -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 450720] [NEW] R_PDFVIEWER not set in most recent R built in Karmic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: r-base This bug was originally reported on the r-sig-debian list (for Debian / Ubuntu user of R). R_PDFVIEWER ends up as being undefined in /etc/R/Revnviron meaning that commands to launch pdf documents fail (unless the user set a pdf viewer option herself). The problem was that the test for xdg-open as a pdf viewer had dropped upstream (and is back in R 2.10.0 beta). I fixed this in Debian release 2.9.2-4, and have just place a new 'sync' from Debian in the revor PPA on launchpad as 2.9.2-3ubuntu1~ppa1. Other than the bug fix, this release also has a new 'greeting text' in /etc/R/Rprofile.site -- with a much shorter two-line text about REvolution R packages (in case none are installed). So if this bui;d could get moved into Karmic it would be good. Dorl ** Affects: r-base (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- R_PDFVIEWER not set in most recent R built in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450720 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 426360] Re: [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever
Hi Colin, Thanks for following-up! On 25 September 2009 at 21:55, Colin Watson wrote: | Dirk, do you have a package somewhere that fixes this? Your comments | above inclined me to think that you did, but I don't know where to look. Sorry -- didn't publicize that all that well. It is in the 'revor' PPA: https://launchpad.net/~revor/+archive/ppa | I'd be happy to guide that into Karmic, or to simply apply the fix given | by spaetz if you say the word. It should already be in Karmic. I tend to do the package work, Scott R does the uploads and Scott K approves them. This was egg-on-face bug originating with our REvolution R extensions that I should have caught but didn't. But it should be fixed already, plus we have another upload slated. Cheers, Dirk | | -- | [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426360 | You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber | of the bug. -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 426360] Re: [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever
On 25 September 2009 at 22:35, Colin Watson wrote: | On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 05:14:19PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > On 25 September 2009 at 21:55, Colin Watson wrote: | > | Dirk, do you have a package somewhere that fixes this? Your comments | > | above inclined me to think that you did, but I don't know where to look. | > | > Sorry -- didn't publicize that all that well. It is in the 'revor' PPA: | > | > https://launchpad.net/~revor/+archive/ppa | > | > | I'd be happy to guide that into Karmic, or to simply apply the fix given | > | by spaetz if you say the word. | > | > It should already be in Karmic. I tend to do the package work, Scott R does | > the uploads and Scott K approves them. | | It's not yet in Karmic; that's why I asked. :-) (It's not in any | approval queue either, as far as I can see.) Ahh. Isaac had checked the Alpha builds and noticed that too. | You left debian/changelog~ and debian/Rprofile.site~ lying around in the | diff - presumably unintentional? I removed it, and uploaded your package Yes, my source-only build invocation must have missed the pre-clean switch. | otherwise unmodified except for changelog updates. I'd like to get this | fixed for the 9.10 beta, hence the rush - Scott R, I hope I'm not | stepping on your toes. Great, we appreciate the effort of getting it into the 9.10 beta! It should be there. | Although I didn't change it for this upload since I wanted to discuss it | with you, I think that for Karmic it would be a good idea to put the | dependencies back the way they were before 2.9.2-2ubuntu1~ppa2, even if | they need to stay otherwise in your PPA; do you disagree? In particular, | if the dpkg dependencies are left the way they are at the moment then it | will be possible for partial upgrades to go wrong, AFAICS. I'd rather | give correct dependencies in Karmic precedence over installability on | Jaunty, at least for packages in the main archive. Concretely, we are talking about - support for libreadline-dev (to get libreadline6) - support for dpkg triggers (hence the dpkg >= requirement) I agree. My short-term convenience should not matter. I can always rebuild on Jaunty. So that would mean another ~ppa$X upload, right? Dirk, out of town at the kid's soccer tournament but with ssh access | Thanks, | | -- | Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] | | -- | [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426360 | You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber | of the bug. -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 426360] Re: [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever
On 18 September 2009 at 09:19, spaetz wrote:
| no patch as file, but it's a one liner. see:
| https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/r-base/+bug/426360/comments/1
|
|
| inlined "patch" (/etc/R/Rprofile.site):
|
| -ow <- options("warn")
| +ow <- options("warn","show.error.messages")
Correct. I directly modified the file debian/Rprofile.site which debian/rules
copies out.
Thanks again for the bug report and help! Took a little longer to get it out
as it got wrapped into two other issues related to the REvo R packages. It
should all work fine now -- as it does on my amd64 box using these packages.
Dirk
| --
| [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever
| https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426360
| You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
| of the bug.
--
Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions.
--
[PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426360
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 444639] Re: Unsuccessful grub2 install in amd64 alternate iso for karmic as of Oct 5
On 23 October 2009 at 22:34, Colin Watson wrote: | Lacking appropriate hardware myself, I'm afraid I'm going to need log | files before I can do anything about this. The necessary logs are | /var/log/installer/syslog and /var/log/installer/partman if you manage | to complete an installation somehow, or /var/log/syslog and | /var/log/partman in the installer environment. You can typically extract | log files from the installer environment by going back to the main menu | and selecting "Save debug logs", or by running 'anna-install openssh- | client-udeb' on tty2 and then copying them out using scp. The hardware I used is now happily running 9.10 with raid1 and I can't really muck with it. Sorry! May be best to flag as not fixed. Dirk, at Google for SoC for the weekend | ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) |Status: New => Incomplete | | -- | Unsuccessful grub2 install in amd64 alternate iso for karmic as of Oct 5 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444639 | You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber | of the bug. -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- Unsuccessful grub2 install in amd64 alternate iso for karmic as of Oct 5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444639 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1870138] Re: svd never finishes
Hi Mike et al, Conrad Sanderson of Octave made me aware of the bug report (via this one for the related MLPACK project: https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack/issues/2437). We also saw this issue with R starting in April, the single best thread and collection is https://bugs.debian.org/961725 It appears to be related to the linker option used by Ubuntu but not by Debian. Dirk ** Bug watch added: github.com/mlpack/mlpack/issues #2437 https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack/issues/2437 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #961725 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961725 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870138 Title: svd never finishes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octave/+bug/1870138/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1868517] Re: Stray /usr/.crates2.json file
Seconded. I just edited the two *.list file and hand-removed /usr/.crates.json to have bat and ripgrep coexist. I really shouldn't have to. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868517 Title: Stray /usr/.crates2.json file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cargo/+bug/1868517/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1860601] Re: [SRU] openblas: -Wl, -Bsymbolic-functions should be stripped from LDFLAGS
Installed in two stages (first OpenMP, then Pthread) verifying that Rscript -e 'example(solve)'# known example to 'hang' under openblas-pthread now works again. Thanks for the fix! edd@rob:~$ dpkg -l | grep openblas | cut -c -70 ii libopenblas-dev:amd64 0.3.8+ds-1ubuntu0.20.04 ii libopenblas-openmp-dev:amd64 0.3.8+ds-1ubuntu0.20.04 ii libopenblas-pthread-dev:amd64 0.3.8+ds-1ubuntu0.20.04 ii libopenblas0:amd64 0.3.8+ds-1ubuntu0.20.04 ii libopenblas0-openmp:amd64 0.3.8+ds-1ubuntu0.20.04 ii libopenblas0-pthread:amd64 0.3.8+ds-1ubuntu0.20.04 edd@rob:~$ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860601 Title: [SRU] openblas: -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions should be stripped from LDFLAGS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hypre/+bug/1860601/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1773687] [NEW] [bionic] no unattended installation
Public bug reported: Package: tzdata Version: 2018d-1 Ubuntu release: 18.04 There appears to be a regression with the preseeding data for tzdata in the 18.04 release. When running apt-get install tzdata I now _always_ drop into an interactive selection of the timezone 'area' and 'zone'. This was not the case before; it is also not the case in Debian 'unstable' right now. I looked into the postinst script, but I can't figure out where the preseeded info would be. I tried debconf-set-selections with a preseed file, but no luck. This blocks usage of tzdata in Docker containers and is there for a bit annoying. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: tzdata 2017c-0ubuntu0.17.10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-41.46-generic 4.13.16 Uname: Linux 4.13.0-41-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3.8 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sun May 27 13:17:42 2018 InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-12-31 (147 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Release amd64 (20171017.1) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: TERM=screen-256color PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: tzdata UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: tzdata (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug artful -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773687 Title: [bionic] no unattended installation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1773687/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1773687] Re: [bionic] no unattended installation
Note that I filed this on my 17.10 machine so the final paragraph is mildly inaccurate. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773687 Title: [bionic] no unattended installation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1773687/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1773687] Re: [bionic] no unattended installation
Also, it is not the package per se but possibly the debconf settings -- installing tzdata_2018e-1 from Debian reveals the same issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773687 Title: [bionic] no unattended installation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1773687/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1773687] Re: [bionic] no unattended installation
Update: A friend just pointed out that setting `export DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive` helps, and I verified that in Docker. So _maybe_ we just dropped that setting? edd@rob:~$ docker run --rm -ti ubuntu:bionic root@cf1720b38f97:/# apt-get update Get:1 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security InRelease [83.2 kB] Get:2 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic InRelease [242 kB] Get:3 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security/universe Sources [3783 B] Get:4 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security/universe amd64 Packages [18.8 kB] Get:5 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security/multiverse amd64 Packages [1066 B] Get:6 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security/main amd64 Packages [88.7 kB] Get:7 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates InRelease [83.2 kB] Get:8 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-backports InRelease [65.5 kB] Get:9 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/universe Sources [11.5 MB] Get:10 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/multiverse amd64 Packages [186 kB] Get:11 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/universe amd64 Packages [11.3 MB] Get:12 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages [1344 kB] Get:13 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/restricted amd64 Packages [13.5 kB] Get:14 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/universe Sources [28.7 kB] Get:15 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/multiverse amd64 Packages [1660 B] Get:16 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/universe amd64 Packages [79.3 kB] Get:17 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main amd64 Packages [127 kB] Fetched 25.2 MB in 4s (5655 kB/s) Reading package lists... Done root@cf1720b38f97:/# export DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive root@cf1720b38f97:/# apt-get install -y tzdata Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: tzdata 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 11 not upgraded. Need to get 188 kB of archives. After this operation, 3088 kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 tzdata all 2018d-1 [188 kB] Fetched 188 kB in 1s (271 kB/s) debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed Selecting previously unselected package tzdata. (Reading database ... 4035 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../tzdata_2018d-1_all.deb ... Unpacking tzdata (2018d-1) ... Setting up tzdata (2018d-1) ... Current default time zone: 'Etc/UTC' Local time is now: Mon May 28 17:10:20 UTC 2018. Universal Time is now: Mon May 28 17:10:20 UTC 2018. Run 'dpkg-reconfigure tzdata' if you wish to change it. root@cf1720b38f97:/# -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773687 Title: [bionic] no unattended installation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1773687/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1773687] Re: [bionic] no unattended installation
Hi Steve, On 28 May 2018 at 22:47, Steve Langasek wrote: | This was going to be my recommended approach, as it's the authoritative | way to have a noninteractive install. I haven't had a chance to look | into the package yet given the holiday weekend. Do you think there is a | bug here that still warrants investigating, or do you think this was a | configuration regression on your side? I have the feeling that one important variable setting may have gotten dropped at your end because if I look at my GH repo here: https://github.com/rocker-org/rocker/tree/master/r-apt you will see essentially identical Dockerfile setups that worked for precise trusty wily xenial yakkety zesty artful and then all of a sudden failed for bionic I will add the setting, but methinks you guys set it before. Or maybe one of the Debian packages involved did. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773687 Title: [bionic] no unattended installation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1773687/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1773687] Re: [bionic] no unattended installation
Hi Steve,
On 30 May 2018 at 00:10, Steve Langasek wrote:
| Ok, I see what's happening here. The reason artful doesn't prompt is
| because /etc/localtime is prepopulated within the image:
|
| $ tar tvf ubuntu-artful-core-cloudimg-amd64-root.tar.gz |grep zoneinfo
| lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2018-05-24 13:44 etc/localtime ->
/usr/share/zoneinfo/UTC
| $
|
| This is despite the fact that the tzdata package itself is not
| installed.
|
| In bionic, this symlink is not present:
|
| $ tar tvf ubuntu-bionic-core-cloudimg-amd64-root.tar.gz |grep zoneinfo
| $
|
| This is in fact a deliberate change in bionic as part of the minimal
| image work; in livecd-rootfs live-build/auto/build:
|
| if [ "${SUBPROJECT:-}" = minimized ] \
|&& ! Chroot chroot dpkg -l tzdata 2>&1 |grep -q ^ii; then
| # workaround for tzdata purge not removing these files
| rm -f chroot/etc/localtime chroot/etc/timezone
| fi
|
| The behavior you're seeing in bionic is the *expected* behavior on a
| completely fresh install of the tzdata package. The reason you don't
| see this behavior in prior releases is that it's not truly a fresh
| install, and there is cruft left on the filesystem in the form of
Nice. I was always a big fan of the minimal ubuntu-server installations "way
back when" a decade or so ago, and am glad to see them back.
| /etc/localtime. If /etc/localtime already exists, tzdata has no need to
| prompt instead of using the existing configuration on the system. If it
| doesn't exist, tzdata will ask debconf, which means a prompt by default.
|
| So your setting DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive, if you don't care about
| /etc/localtime and just tzdata to use the default, is the correct fix
| here.
Agreed. I have set that in the corresponding bionic Dockerfile and will use
it going forward.
Cheers, Dirk
| ** Changed in: tzdata (Ubuntu)
|Status: New => Invalid
|
| --
| You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
| report.
| https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773687
|
| Title:
| [bionic] no unattended installation
|
| To manage notifications about this bug go to:
| https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1773687/+subscriptions
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773687
Title:
[bionic] no unattended installation
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1773687/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1243725] Re: Clang++ fails to compile due to wrong path to bits/c++config.h
Confirmed -- it also bit me (and I filed it at http://askubuntu.com/questions/383029/clang-version-3-3-lacks-headers before checking here). Sylvestre, the Debian maintainer, states this is fixed in -9. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1243725 Title: Clang++ fails to compile due to wrong path to bits/c++config.h To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-3.3/+bug/1243725/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1295267] Re: Windows change Monitor/Desktop after screen lock
Same here with 15.04 (as well as previous releases for at least a few years; I tend to update every six months). Running two screens with an older NVidia nvs280 (or 285), and now three screens at work with a radeon. So not a chipset issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295267 Title: Windows change Monitor/Desktop after screen lock To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1295267/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1295267] Re: Windows change Monitor/Desktop after screen lock
Update to the last update: on the Radeon-based three-screen setup it seems to happen less than at home. Still moves some windows some times when locking... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295267 Title: Windows change Monitor/Desktop after screen lock To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1295267/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1244263] Re: ggobi needs porting from libgraph to libcgraph (remove binaries for now)
It still builds fine for me under Debian, incl with the Graphviz-using part. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1244263 Title: ggobi needs porting from libgraph to libcgraph (remove binaries for now) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ggobi/+bug/1244263/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1072720] Re: bti is broken (fix appears to be known)
Confirmed. This hit me as well. A simple local rebuild of the package fixed it --- please schedule a binary non-maintainer rebuild. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1072720 Title: bti is broken (fix appears to be known) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bti/+bug/1072720/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 804171] Re: After latest upgrade of oneiric, Lightdm or Xserver not working
Just wanted to confirm that I was bitten by this too running 'do- release-upgrade' from a pretty recent natty install --- and that it was fixed by installing 'unity-greeter'. Should the Recommends: be a Depends? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804171 Title: After latest upgrade of oneiric, Lightdm or Xserver not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/804171/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548992] Re: Wireless connection frequently drops [deauthenticating by local choice (reason=3)]
Quick confirmation of post #13 -- I was seeing the infamous 'deauthenticating from by local choice' and running 'apt-get remove network-manager' fixed it. FWIW this was on my IBM/Lenovo X60 running Debian testing; the netbook running Kubuntu 10.4 is just fine. So a thanks! and tip of the hat to Chris Bainbridge for the hint! -- Wireless connection frequently drops [deauthenticating by local choice (reason=3)] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548992 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 379511] Re: beancounter currency weakness: can't handle lowercase
A patch would be welcome. Should be just a matter of wrapping the 'uc' operator in to upper-case the currency. We do that for the symbol anyway. -- beancounter currency weakness: can't handle lowercase https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379511 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 379493] Re: beancounter manpage mistook dbname config option for dbsystem
Good catch -- fixing that now and a fresh Debian release will be forthcoming. -- beancounter manpage mistook dbname config option for dbsystem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379493 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 379513] Re: beancounter lacked function to re-activate deactivate-d symbol
Doesn't pass my reasonableness check. Stocks get delisted, they rarely ever come back. If it bugs you badly, send me a patch to my normal maintainer / upstream address. -- beancounter lacked function to re-activate deactivate-d symbol https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948701] Re: Hard system lock under 5.* kernel on standard laptop
Update. And I don't want to jinx it but ... it seems like 22.04 (to be) has this fixed. Updated to it two days ago, and it seems fine with its kernel 5.15.0-23-generic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948701 Title: Hard system lock under 5.* kernel on standard laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1948701/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948701] Re: Hard system lock under 5.* kernel on standard laptop
It was a mirage. The system is still locking up, something that did not happen with an older kernel, and also not with other systems booting off USB. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948701 Title: Hard system lock under 5.* kernel on standard laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1948701/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948701] [NEW] Hard system lock under 5.* kernel on standard laptop
Public bug reported: This issue appeared first under 21.04, and I (wrongly) suspected a bug in the window manager or graphics stack. I posted on askubuntu at https://askubuntu.com/questions/1346317/ubuntu-21-04-and-21-10-lock- hard-with-basic-gui-redrawing-using-standard-intel-g and even offered a bounty but no luck. I then hopen 21.10 may solve it, but alas, no. At issue is a fairly immediate system lock as soon as I use Chrome or Slack and switch desktops. It typically locks the machine with minutes of a reboot -- making it unuseable under GUI. On the other hand, I kept it running 'headless' (just ssh'ed in from byobu running on my desktop) for a month so I had some reason to believe the hard ware was not at fault. Now, more recently, I realized that I had not tried an older kernel, and indeed under 4.13.0-46-generic, still installed from an older relese, everything runs fine! I would be happy to help debug if you pointers or test builds. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10 Package: linux-image-5.13.0-20-generic 5.13.0-20.20 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-46.51-generic 4.13.16 Uname: Linux 4.13.0-46-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu70 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: edd2005 F pulseaudio CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown Date: Mon Oct 25 13:04:38 2021 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=97ca6744-22ea-45bd-bf19-38197b40062c InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-08-08 (1904 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160719) MachineType: LENOVO 20FCCTO1WW ProcEnviron: TERM=screen-256color PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.13.0-46-generic root=UUID=5f3d6606-96bb-422c-9918-62d7cf6850fb ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-4.13.0-46-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-4.13.0-46-generic N/A linux-firmware 1.201 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to impish on 2021-10-14 (11 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 06/23/2016 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO dmi.bios.version: N1FET41W (1.15 ) dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available dmi.board.name: 20FCCTO1WW dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO dmi.board.version: SDK0J40705 WIN dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO dmi.chassis.version: None dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrN1FET41W(1.15):bd06/23/2016:svnLENOVO:pn20FCCTO1WW:pvrThinkPadX1Carbon4th:rvnLENOVO:rn20FCCTO1WW:rvrSDK0J40705WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNone: dmi.product.family: ThinkPad X1 Carbon 4th dmi.product.name: 20FCCTO1WW dmi.product.version: ThinkPad X1 Carbon 4th dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug impish -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948701 Title: Hard system lock under 5.* kernel on standard laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1948701/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948701] Re: Hard system lock under 5.* kernel on standard laptop
If anybody has a hypothesis of what could be causing the lock, I would be game to trying different kernel builds (or parameterizations). So far I mostly glad I can run the machine again, even if it needs a 4.* kernel. Otherwise, is there a particular crash I could enable to diagnose? The machine really locks *hard* i.e. all I can do once it happens is powercycle so I am not too hopeful about logging. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948701 Title: Hard system lock under 5.* kernel on standard laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1948701/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948701] Re: Hard system lock under 5.* kernel on standard laptop
Bump. This bug is still open AFAICT. And I just realized that the real cost to me on this machine (which otherwise runs great with the old 4.* kernel) is that I cannot launch Docker containers any more. Which stinks. Machine otherwise happy and stable under 21.10 *provided I run the ancient kernel*. If there is something I could or should test, please let me know and I will. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948701 Title: Hard system lock under 5.* kernel on standard laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1948701/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
