[Bug 222288] [NEW] flash plugin won't work with NY Times Video

2008-04-25 Thread Dan McGrath
Public bug reported:

Upgraded to Ubuntu 8.04. Flash no longer works on NY Times Video...just
hangs up. Does the same thing on a couple of other sites.

** Affects: install-flash-player (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
flash plugin won't work with NY Times Video
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 988173] [NEW] maas-import-isos fails

2012-04-24 Thread Dan McGrath
Public bug reported:

After several attempts to try "sudo maas-import-isos" (from the
instructions at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/MAAS), I keep getting
errors about proxying:

"httpd does not appear to be running and proxying clobber"

It seems to download everything just fine, but for whatever reason it
fails to actually save or install (or cache) the files, forcing me
through multiple hour long+ attempts at 50k/s :(

A quick glance at the process list does show apache and squid running,
however. This is an install from the 12.04 server beta 2 iso
(ubuntu-12.04-beta2-server-i386.iso). Should I have done anything beyond
telling it to install maas and apt-get updating the server? Also, I
didn't select any tasks during the installer.

$ lsb_release -rd:
Description:Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Release:12.04

$ apt-cache policy maas
maas:
  Installed: 0.1+bzr482+dfsg-0ubuntu1
  Candidate: 0.1+bzr482+dfsg-0ubuntu1
  Version table:
 *** 0.1+bzr482+dfsg-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: maas 0.1+bzr482+dfsg-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-20.33-generic-pae 3.2.12
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-20-generic-pae i686
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu5
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Apr 25 01:05:47 2012
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Beta i386 
(20120327)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
 TERM=linux
 LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
RelatedPackageVersions:
 python-django-maas 0.1+bzr482+dfsg-0ubuntu1
 apparmor   2.7.102-0ubuntu3
SourcePackage: maas
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
modified.conffile..etc.maas.maas.local.settings.py: [modified]
modified.conffile..etc.maas.pserv.yaml: [modified]
modified.conffile..etc.maas.txlongpoll.yaml: [modified]
mtime.conffile..etc.maas.maas.local.settings.py: 2012-04-24T21:30:30.995008
mtime.conffile..etc.maas.pserv.yaml: 2012-04-24T21:30:10.111008
mtime.conffile..etc.maas.txlongpoll.yaml: 2012-04-24T21:30:10.307008

** Affects: maas (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988173

Title:
  maas-import-isos fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/988173/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 988173] Re: maas-import-isos fails

2012-04-24 Thread Dan McGrath
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988173

Title:
  maas-import-isos fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/988173/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 988173] Re: maas-import-isos fails

2012-04-25 Thread Dan McGrath
Since I was running in a VM before instead of ssh, copy/pasting the
original process was a little awkward, so I figured I would run once
more with the actual output for the sake of being complete. Hope this
helps :)


$ sudo maas-import-isos
httpd does not appear to be running and proxying cobbler
httpd does not appear to be running and proxying cobbler
mount: warning: /tmp/cobbler-ubuntu-import.uqesLs/mnt seems to be mounted 
read-only.
httpd does not appear to be running and proxying cobbler
failed to import precise-x86_64
httpd does not appear to be running and proxying cobbler
httpd does not appear to be running and proxying cobbler
httpd does not appear to be running and proxying cobbler
httpd does not appear to be running and proxying cobbler
mount: warning: /tmp/cobbler-ubuntu-import.6AGFjq/mnt seems to be mounted 
read-only.
httpd does not appear to be running and proxying cobbler
failed to import precise-i386
httpd does not appear to be running and proxying cobbler
httpd does not appear to be running and proxying cobbler
--2012-04-25 01:52:22--  
https://maas.ubuntu.com/images/ephemeral/releases/precise/beta-3/precise-ephemeral-maas-amd64.tar.gz
Resolving maas.ubuntu.com (maas.ubuntu.com)... 91.189.88.146
Connecting to maas.ubuntu.com (maas.ubuntu.com)|91.189.88.146|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 294875035 (281M) [application/x-gzip]
Saving to: 
`/var/lib/maas/ephemeral/.working/maas-import-ephemerals.NiTPvT/precise/amd64/dist.tar.gz'

 0K        1% 66.1K 71m52s
  3072K        2% 59.9K 74m45s
  6144K        3% 73.5K 70m22s
[snip]
276480K       97% 62.7K 2m6s
279552K       98% 64.2K 80s
282624K       99% 70.9K 34s
285696K     ...  100% 65.6K=71m38s

2012-04-25 03:04:01 (67.0 KB/s) - `/var/lib/maas/ephemeral/.working
/maas-import-ephemerals.NiTPvT/precise/amd64/dist.tar.gz' saved
[294875035/294875035]

httpd does not appear to be running and proxying cobbler
failed to add precise-x86_64-maas-ephemeral
failed to update cobbler for 
maas-precise-x86_64-commissioning/precise-x86_64-maas-ephemeral
httpd does not appear to be running and proxying cobbler
httpd does not appear to be running and proxying cobbler
httpd does not appear to be running and proxying cobbler
httpd does not appear to be running and proxying cobbler
httpd does not appear to be running and proxying cobbler

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988173

Title:
  maas-import-isos fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/988173/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 988173] Re: maas-import-isos fails

2012-04-25 Thread Dan McGrath
Ah, great tip, worked like a charm! It would seem that I forgot that I
changed the vm networking from NAT to bridged, thus affecting the
original IP I gave it during install that I had forgotten about. PEBKAC
:)

Anyways, thanks for the help, please close o/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988173

Title:
  maas-import-isos fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/988173/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1452314] [NEW] TZ=EDT date reporting misleading times

2015-05-06 Thread Dan McGrath
Public bug reported:

While working in a UTC system I stumbled upon some oddities with the
date command, that at least appear to differ from how BSD systems report
(correctly) when EDT or gibberish is passed to date via the TZ env
variable.

Currently I am in EST timezone, which during daylight savings time, is
EDT. If I run date with "TZ=", I get changes in timezones used by date
as expected, but noticed that EDT was actually returning UTC time, but
displays "EDT" (so 10am becomes 2pm) despite actually displaying UTC.

As a test, I also tried supply a bunch of gibberish only to find that
BSD actually replaces the gibberish with the text "UTC", while linux
systems just spit back the same gibberish (ie: TZ=jhsdjflhljak date),
but report it in UTC time. So in the case where a user supplies a valid
timezone such as EDT, one can make time related mistakes as linux will
actually report UTC but use the label the user supplied. What is worse,
is that Ubuntu actually shows my current time zone as "EDT" yet it isn't
recognized as a valid zone!

Here are some same outputs to clarify the problem on linux and bsd:

Freebsd:
[dan@barley ~]$ TZ=UTC date 
Wed May  6 15:09:26 UTC 2015
[dan@barley ~]$ TZ=EST date
Wed May  6 10:09:32 EST 2015
[dan@barley ~]$ TZ=EDT date
Wed May  6 15:09:39 UTC 2015
[dan@barley ~]$ TZ=lkjhsd date
Wed May  6 15:11:16 UTC 2015   < good, correctly informs me what its 
reporting


Ubuntu 14.04:
dan@wks:~$ TZ=UTC date
Wed May  6 15:10:48 UTC 2015
dan@wks:~$ TZ=EST date
Wed May  6 10:10:48 EST 2015
dan@wks:~$ TZ=EDT date
Wed May  6 15:10:48 EDT 2015   < EDT = UTC?!
dan@wks:~$ date
Wed May  6 11:10:56 EDT 2015   < the real EDT time
dan@wks:~$ TZ=lkjhsd date
Wed May  6 15:11:30 lkjhsd 2015  <= wth?

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: coreutils 8.21-1ubuntu5.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-46.79-generic 3.13.11-ckt15
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-46-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.10
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: XFCE
Date: Wed May  6 11:01:37 2015
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-06-11 (329 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140416.2)
SourcePackage: coreutils
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: coreutils (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1452314

Title:
  TZ=EDT date reporting misleading times

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/1452314/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1452314] Re: TZ=EDT date reporting misleading times

2015-05-06 Thread Dan McGrath
Just to clarify, the problem with TZ=EDT isn't that it reports EDT
wrong, per se, but that any unrecognized time zones show as UTC. Now,
why TZ=EDT isn't valid when `date` on its own here reports EDT just
fine, is beyond me :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1452314

Title:
  TZ=EDT date reporting misleading times

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/1452314/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1354375] [NEW] lxc-snapshot destroys container

2014-08-08 Thread Dan McGrath
Public bug reported:

Was following instructions for lxc-snapshots at:

  https://help.ubuntu.com/lts/serverguide/lxc.html

The problem I am reporting is that when I create a snapshot with:

  lxc-snapshot -n c1

which creates snap0 (snap1...snapN, etc.), after I try restore the
snapshot with:

  lxc-snapshot -r snap0 -n c1

lxc seems to happily remove snap0 and c1, thus destroying the entire
container. I would paste the output, but it was via a vbox vm and wasn't
easy to copy/paste the text, so I have attached a screenshot instead.

The release was 14.0.4.1 LTS with lxc 1.0.5-0ubuntu0.1. What I expected
was for the snapshot to first remove c1 and then rename snap0 to c1.
Seeing as how the c1 container was a LVM snapshot I can see that
removing c1 (the origin of snap0) might be the reason for it killing
snap0 and c1, but it seems a little unpexted, especially if this had
been more than a test.

Is this a real bug?

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: lxc 1.0.5-0ubuntu0.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-32.57-generic 3.13.11.4
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-32-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.3
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri Aug  8 05:58:41 2014
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-08-07 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 
(20140416.2)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
 TERM=linux
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: lxc
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
defaults.conf:
 lxc.network.type = veth
 lxc.network.link = lxcbr0
 lxc.network.flags = up
 lxc.network.hwaddr = 00:16:3e:xx:xx:xx

** Affects: lxc (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty

** Attachment added: "Screenshot of the problem"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1354375/+attachment/4172685/+files/Screenshot%20-%2014-08-08%20-%2006%3A11%3A58%20AM.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1354375

Title:
  lxc-snapshot destroys container

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1354375/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 290485] Re: Please sync ca-certificates 20080809 (main) from Debian unstable (main).

2013-03-16 Thread Dan McGrath
I think this bug is affecting me at least in 12.04:

# openssl x509 -text -in /usr/share/ca-certificates/cacert.org/cacert.org.crt | 
grep Signature
Signature Algorithm: md5WithRSAEncryption
Signature Algorithm: md5WithRSAEncryption

The problem is that cacert.org breaks svn over https for some projects
that use cacert since an update to neon for gnutls disables certs with
md5 for security, at least if I understand the problem correctly.

Our work around was to tell everyone to add an option to not trust the
~/.subversion/servers file ("ssl-trust-default-ca = no"), but it would
be nice if this just worked "out of the box" for people with the latest
security updates in ubuntu.

Is there any reason why this hasn't been fixed yet? Or is fix for cacert
in this bug something else? (if so, apologies, I will report a separate
bug).

Thanks o/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290485

Title:
  Please sync ca-certificates 20080809 (main) from Debian unstable
  (main).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates/+bug/290485/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 290485] Re: Please sync ca-certificates 20080809 (main) from Debian unstable (main).

2013-03-16 Thread Dan McGrath
hehe, I was thinking the same thing about the Chinese Post office
(!mozilla/Hongkong_Post_Root_CA_1.crt) :) I looked at the wiki URL you
pasted though, but it seems a little old and dated. We appear to be long
past the point where they were deciding to include it or not, it would
appear.

Anyways, a quick check in my /etc/ca-certificates.conf show it is enabled:
cacert.org/cacert.org.crt

The cert seems to be activated and installed just fine. The problem is
that this cert is useless ever since the gnutls patch mentioned above
that refuses all certs that used md5 instead of sha1, which this is
affected by.

A quick check of their wiki shows their Class 1 cert signed MD5 still though:
  https://wiki.cacert.org/Roots/StateOverview

hmm, perhaps I should email them as inquire what might be causing them
to only use md5+sha1 root cert instead of just sha1. There might be some
technical or political problem preventing them from solving this
properly.

Anyways, thanks for quick reply. o/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290485

Title:
  Please sync ca-certificates 20080809 (main) from Debian unstable
  (main).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates/+bug/290485/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 290485] Re: Please sync ca-certificates 20080809 (main) from Debian unstable (main).

2013-03-16 Thread Dan McGrath
Ah, it would appear that they have already published a FAQ on this
matter (/me slaps myself for not checking the urls on that page BEFORE
replying!):

  https://wiki.cacert.org/FAQ/Class3Resign

Apologies for email noise.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290485

Title:
  Please sync ca-certificates 20080809 (main) from Debian unstable
  (main).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates/+bug/290485/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs