[Bug 406064] [NEW] tendracc -time does not work
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tendra The -time option errs out on tendracc. e.g. "tendracc -time hello.c" returns: builtin/mkdir /var/tmp/tccZWV9r7 /bin/time /usr/lib/TenDRA/machines/linux/2.6.24-19-server/80x86/bin/tdfc2 -n /usr/lib/TenDRA/lib/startup/Bounds.ansi/default.pf -f/usr/lib/TenDRA/lib/startup/Modes/Xc -Nansi:/usr/lib/TenDRA/lib/include/ansi.api -I/usr/lib/TenDRA/lib/startup/Bounds.ansi -I/usr/lib/TenDRA/lib/startup/Modes hello.c /var/tmp/tccZWV9r7/hello.j tcc: Error: Can't execute '/bin/time'. builtin/remove /var/tmp/tccZWV9r7 The time program is actually in /usr/bin/time, not /bin/time. version 4.1.2-18 ** Affects: tendra (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- tendracc -time does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413732] [NEW] tendracc allows negative length arrays
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tendra tendracc in tendra version 4.1.2-18 allows an invalid negative-length array definition in some cases. The construct in which this is allowed is often used in autoconf tests that assume the compiler will cause an error when it is encountered. The attached C program shows the problem. ** Affects: tendra (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- tendracc allows negative length arrays https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413732 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413732] Re: tendracc allows negative length arrays
** Attachment added: "Short C program showing tendracc array bug" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30328715/bug.c -- tendracc allows negative length arrays https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413732 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 806581] [NEW] Install script hard codes mkfontdir from incorrect path
Public bug reported: On installation of xfonts-nexus 0.0.2-14, the following error message is shown: Setting up xfonts-nexus (0.0.2-14) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/xfonts-nexus.postinst: 13: /usr/X11R6/bin/mkfontdir: not found Sure enough, mkfontdir from xfonts-utils 1:7.5+2 is found at /usr/bin/mkfontdir instead. ** Affects: xfonts-nexus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/806581 Title: Install script hard codes mkfontdir from incorrect path To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfonts-nexus/+bug/806581/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 388345] Re: Gimp will not save Olympus .orf files opened through UFRaw as .jpg.
Can you give a sample .orf file that demonstrates this problem? I was not able to reproduce this with libexif12-0.6.19-1, gimp-2.6.8-2ubuntu1.3, and ufraw-0.16-1build1 with a sample .orf image from http://img.photographyblog.com/reviews/olympus_ep1/sample_images/olympus_ep1_07.orf. If it is a libexif problem, it's probably been fixed in the newer release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388345 Title: Gimp will not save Olympus .orf files opened through UFRaw as .jpg. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libexif/+bug/388345/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 712115] Re: Text of libexif Template “libexif-12” is incorrect
"knot" is both a unit of speed and a unit of distance. Nautical miles may be slightly clearer here, but the context makes it obvious which meaning of knot is being used. Since the original text is what's used in the EXIF spec itself, I'm hesitant to change it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712115 Title: Text of libexif Template “libexif-12” is incorrect -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 712115] Re: Text of libexif Template “libexif-12” is incorrect
This is now fixed in upstream CVS. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712115 Title: Text of libexif Template “libexif-12” is incorrect -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 712115] Re: Text of libexif Template “libexif-12” is incorrect
Normative documents like the Random House Dictionary (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/knot), Princeton's WordNet (http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=knot), Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (http://dictionary.die.net/knot) and the Century Dictionary (http://www.leoyan.com/century- dictionary.com/cent2jpgframes.php?volno=04&page=3306)?. This form of usage seems accepted; it's not "clearly" a mistake, although it might have been accidental. In any case, there doesn't seem to be a compelling reason to leave it this way; I'll fix it in the source. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712115 Title: Text of libexif Template “libexif-12” is incorrect -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 527613] Re: ppmrainbow(1) insists on optional -t tmpdir being given
Still present in 10.04 (using netpbm 2:10.0-12.1ubuntu1) -- ppmrainbow(1) insists on optional -t tmpdir being given https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 527613] Re: ppmrainbow(1) insists on optional -t tmpdir being given
** Changed in: netpbm-free (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- ppmrainbow(1) insists on optional -t tmpdir being given https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 527613] Re: ppmrainbow(1) insists on optional -t tmpdir being given
Confirmed! FWIW, it looks like an upstream problem. The Ubuntu diff doesn't touch ppmrainbow. netpbm-10.35.76 from upstream doesn't suffer from this problem. -- ppmrainbow(1) insists on optional -t tmpdir being given https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186159] Re: pbmtextps/pnmcrop crash
This is still valid on 9.04 and 10.04 with netpbm 2:10.0-12.1ubuntu1 ** Changed in: netpbm-free (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- pbmtextps/pnmcrop crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197306] Re: Duplicated sentence in libexif-12
This is fixed in upstream CVS. -- Duplicated sentence in libexif-12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197306 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 221755] Re: /usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/jpeg: fatal error: Segmentation fault
The example image link is no longer valid, but I can't reproduce this problem on another Olympus E-10 image on Ubuntu 8.10 using gimp 2.6.1 and libexif 0.6.16-2.1ubuntu1 (or libexif 0.6.19 compiled from source). -- /usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/jpeg: fatal error: Segmentation fault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221755 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 147784] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in exif_loader_write()
I am unable to reproduce this on Ubuntu 8.10 with libexif 0.6.16-2.1ubuntu1 (or libexif 0.6.19 compiled from source). -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in exif_loader_write() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147784 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
