[Bug 262251] Re: phpize: configure:8184: error: possibly undefined macro: _LT_SET_OPTIONS

2009-06-17 Thread Dainius 'GreatEmerald' Masiliūnas
I also had this problem, and Alessandro's fix seems to have done the
trick!

-- 
phpize: configure:8184: error: possibly undefined macro: _LT_SET_OPTIONS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262251
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384920] Re: iwconfig bitrate is not set properly

2009-06-16 Thread Dainius 'GreatEmerald' Masiliūnas
I've found out another fix: get compat-wireless from
http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable/ and install. This
will make the rate more or less correct (although varying; I still tend
to set it to rate 54M fixed though).

-- 
iwconfig bitrate is not set properly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384920
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384920] [NEW] iwconfig bitrate is not set properly

2009-06-08 Thread Dainius 'GreatEmerald' Masiliūnas
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: wireless-tools

I'm using Xubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope, and the bug is in wireless-
tools 29-1.1ubuntu2 (but not limited to it; this bug has also appeared
in other distributions such as Fedora). The hardware I'm using is a
Ralink RT2500 wireless card, and my internet connection security is
WPA/WPA2. I'm using the latest NetworkManager to connect to the
internet, and NetworkManager-gnome as GUI.

The issue is that the internet connection speed is not set to what it
should be. All the connections always get set to 1Mb/s, no matter what
the actual connection speed should be, and thus it greatly limits the
connection. Although I'm not sure, but I believe that the auto bitrate
in iwconfig is malfunctioning in that it always sets the lowest possible
speed.

I've also found a workaround: if you manually set the connection speed,
it works properly (and NetworkManager-gnome reflects that change). The
only things needed to do is open a terminal and enter this:

ifconfig wlan0 up
iwconfig wlan0 rate 54M

...assuming the connection is wlan0. This needs to be done each time the
connection is established, though, so I have added the lines to
/etc/rc.local. Though I have read that the same can be achieved by
entering "iwconfig wlan0 rate 54M fixed" instead.

** Affects: wireless-tools (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: wireless-tools (Fedora)
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #469120
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469120

** Also affects: wireless-tools (Fedora) via
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469120
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
iwconfig bitrate is not set properly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384920
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384920] Re: iwconfig bitrate is not set properly

2009-06-09 Thread Dainius 'GreatEmerald' Masiliūnas
This bug is also confirmed in wireless-tools question #30772 :
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wireless-tools/+question/30772

-- 
iwconfig bitrate is not set properly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384920
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 200500] Re: mac80211: WLAN losing connection: No ProbeResp

2009-06-09 Thread Dainius 'GreatEmerald' Masiliūnas
Confirmed with Xubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope, 2.6.28 kernel. The bug is
just as described - dmesg says that NetworkManager assumes that the
wireless is out of range, and changing mlme.c fixes the issue, but, of
course, chankging the kernel each time isn't optimal. Using Ralink
RT2500 card.

A workaround guide can be found here:
http://www.mikegerwitz.com/2008/10/15/ralink-wireless-random-disconnects-no-proberesp/

** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #469120
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469120

** Also affects: linux (Fedora) via
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469120
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
mac80211: WLAN losing connection: No ProbeResp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200500
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1766859] Re: Display corrupted in virtualbox

2018-12-19 Thread Dainius 'GreatEmerald' Masiliūnas
It affects me as well, with the host being openSUSE Leap 15.0 with Intel
graphics. (Guest is the aforementioned Lubuntu 18.04.) The workaround to
switch TTYs (via right Ctrl+F1/F7) works.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766859

Title:
  Display corrupted in virtualbox

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-meta/+bug/1766859/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1482069] Re: miredo.service fails on boot

2015-08-24 Thread Dainius 'GreatEmerald' Masiliūnas
** Also affects: miredo
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1482069

Title:
  miredo.service fails on boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/miredo/+bug/1482069/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1482069] Re: miredo.service fails on boot

2015-08-24 Thread Dainius 'GreatEmerald' Masiliūnas
Confirmed, both the problem and the workaround, and it's present upstream too. 
The issue is described here:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/NetworkTarget/
Requiring only network.target means requiring NetworkManager to start, but not 
requiring DNS to be up; since miredo is started before DNS is up, and it can't 
cope with it, the result is failure.

The possible solutions/workarounds are: 1) As per above, require
network-online.target (one can use /etc/systemd/system/miredo.service.d
/network-online.conf or similar override instead of editing the whole
file); 2) Enable NetworkManager-wait-online (not recommended as it slows
down boot); 3) Fix Miredo to wait for DNS to be up by itself.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1482069

Title:
  miredo.service fails on boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/miredo/+bug/1482069/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 371897]

2012-10-16 Thread Dainius 'GreatEmerald' Masiliūnas
As a user,  I also agree that the patch should be reviewed. I have yet
to see a valid reason for not reviewing the patch - it having been
submitted while in code freeze has no relevance to the code itself, and
while the size of the patch might mean that it will take a while to
review, it is still better to do that sooner rather than later. It does
not look like the patch is going to get smaller any time soon.

Of course, if there is something that Maarten can do to make the process
easier - like splitting the patch into modular pieces - I would imagine
it would be appreciated.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371897

Title:
  Occasional sound drops in Wine via PulseAudio

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/wine/+bug/371897/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 371897]

2012-10-13 Thread Dainius 'GreatEmerald' Masiliūnas
So, what is the progress on this from the official Wine side? Is it
still being worked on, as mentioned in Comment 369?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371897

Title:
  Occasional sound drops in Wine via PulseAudio

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/wine/+bug/371897/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 767975] Re: Screen stays black after suspend with AMD Fusion APUs and fglrx driver

2012-10-14 Thread Dainius 'GreatEmerald' Masiliūnas
Same issue on an ASUS 1015BX, on Mageia 2 (kernel 3.3.8). The acpi_sleep
method didn't change anything, setting C6 off didn't change anything,
and the PC is already running the latest available EFI.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767975

Title:
  Screen stays black after suspend with AMD Fusion APUs and fglrx driver

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/767975/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 610869] Re: mountall ignores nofail mount option

2012-08-11 Thread Dainius 'GreatEmerald' Masiliūnas
I agree with comment #21. This is an important feature, and it's strange that 
it hasn't been implemented yet. The expected behaviour should be:
- If device can be mounted, mount it.
- If device can't be mounted, skip it (also possibly log the event somewhere).
- Optionally allow for specifying time for the device to go online.

In my case, it would be very useful in cases when you have to use an
external partitioning tool to change some non-essential partition on
your disk - right now it just fails to boot, leaving you with very
primitive tools to make it boot again without that partition being
mounted.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610869

Title:
  mountall ignores nofail mount option

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/610869/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs