[Bug 409261] [NEW] system-config-kickstart: WARNING: setting an adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: system-config-kickstart lsb_release -rd: Description:Ubuntu karmic (development branch) Release:9.10 system-config-kickstart: Installed: 2.5.20-0ubuntu19 Candidate: 2.5.20-0ubuntu19 Version table: *** 2.5.20-0ubuntu19 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Description: Run system-config-kickstart from the command line. Open the preferences dialog. The following message will be displayed four times on the console. Gtk-WARNING **: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated Related to https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/spinbutton- adjustment-warnings ** Affects: system-config-kickstart (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: gtkspinbutton -- system-config-kickstart: WARNING: setting an adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409261 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409261] Re: system-config-kickstart: WARNING: setting an adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated
** Attachment added: "Patch to glade file" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29925499/GladeSpinButtonWarning.patch -- system-config-kickstart: WARNING: setting an adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409261 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409270] [NEW] system-config-kickstart: Traceback: on_list_view_row_activated
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: system-config-kickstart Description:Ubuntu karmic (development branch) Release:9.10 system-config-kickstart: Installed: 2.5.20-0ubuntu19 Candidate: 2.5.20-0ubuntu19 Version table: *** 2.5.20-0ubuntu19 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Description: When running system-config-kickstart from the command line, you get the following traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/bfox/packages/system-config-kickstart/karmic-orig/system-config-kickstart-2.5.20/src/kickstartGui.py", line 188, in on_list_view_row_activated category = self.category_store.get_value(iter, 0) TypeError: iter must be a GtkTreeIter This is due to the event handler for the category_store being hooked up before the self.toplevel.show() call. So, when the program launches, it triggers a call to the on_list_view_row_activated() function, which in turn calls a get_selection() on the GtkTreeView that has no selection made. I'm attaching a patch that hooks up the event handlers after the call to self.toplevel.show() ** Affects: system-config-kickstart (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- system-config-kickstart: Traceback: on_list_view_row_activated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409270 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409270] Re: system-config-kickstart: Traceback: on_list_view_row_activated
** Attachment added: "Patch to fix event handler traceback" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29926598/EventHandlerTraceback.patch -- system-config-kickstart: Traceback: on_list_view_row_activated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409270 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409352] Re: system-config-kickstart: Traceback when using --generate without a file name
** Attachment added: "Patch to improve option handling at the command line" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29930122/generateOptionTraceback.patch -- system-config-kickstart: Traceback when using --generate without a file name https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409352 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409352] [NEW] system-config-kickstart: Traceback when using --generate without a file name
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: system-config-kickstart
Description:Ubuntu karmic (development branch)
Release:9.10
system-config-kickstart:
Installed: 2.5.20-0ubuntu19
Candidate: 2.5.20-0ubuntu19
Version table:
*** 2.5.20-0ubuntu19 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
If you run system-config-kickstart from the command line using the
--generate option without specifying a filename, you get the following
traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./system-config-kickstart.py", line 54, in
opts, file = getopt.getopt(sys.argv[1:], "g:h", ["generate=", "help"])
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/getopt.py", line 89, in getopt
opts, args = do_longs(opts, args[0][2:], longopts, args[1:])
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/getopt.py", line 157, in do_longs
raise GetoptError('option --%s requires argument' % opt, opt)
getopt.GetoptError: option --generate requires argument
I'm attaching a patch which should handle this more gracefully.
** Affects: system-config-kickstart (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
system-config-kickstart: Traceback when using --generate without a file name
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409352
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409368] [NEW] system-config-kickstart: RFE: Add support for ext4 filesystem (default in Karmic)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: system-config-kickstart Description:Ubuntu karmic (development branch) Release:9.10 system-config-kickstart: Installed: 2.5.20-0ubuntu19 Candidate: 2.5.20-0ubuntu19 Version table: *** 2.5.20-0ubuntu19 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Since ext4 is now the default filesystem in Karmic, we need to add ext4 to s-c-kickstart's supported filesystem types. ** Affects: system-config-kickstart (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- system-config-kickstart: RFE: Add support for ext4 filesystem (default in Karmic) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409368 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409368] Re: system-config-kickstart: RFE: Add support for ext4 filesystem (default in Karmic)
** Attachment added: "Patch to add ext4 option to the partWindow.py dialog" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29931412/ext4Addition.patch -- system-config-kickstart: RFE: Add support for ext4 filesystem (default in Karmic) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409368 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409554] [NEW] system-config-kickstart: Traceback on opening a nonexistent file
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: system-config-kickstart Description:Ubuntu karmic (development branch) Release:9.10 system-config-kickstart: Installed: 2.5.20-0ubuntu19 Candidate: 2.5.20-0ubuntu19 Version table: *** 2.5.20-0ubuntu19 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Description: When trying to run system-config-kickstart from the command line with a bogus filename for a kickstart file, you get the following traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File "./system-config-kickstart.py", line 82, in kickstartGui.kickstartGui(file) File "/home/bfox/packages/system-config-kickstart/karmic-orig/system-config-kickstart-2.5.20/src/kickstartGui.py", line 168, in __init__ self.kickstartParser = kickstartParser.KickstartParser(self.kickstartData, file) File "/home/bfox/packages/system-config-kickstart/karmic-orig/system-config-kickstart-2.5.20/src/kickstartParser.py", line 71, in __init__ self.readKickstartFile(file) File "/home/bfox/packages/system-config-kickstart/karmic-orig/system-config-kickstart-2.5.20/src/kickstartParser.py", line 74, in readKickstartFile self.lines = open(file, "r").readlines() IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'foo.cfg' I am attaching a patch which should handle this situation more gracefully. ** Affects: system-config-kickstart (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- system-config-kickstart: Traceback on opening a nonexistent file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409554 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409554] Re: system-config-kickstart: Traceback on opening a nonexistent file
** Attachment added: "This is a patch to fix a traceback when opening a bogus filename from the command line" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29942554/fileOpenTraceback.patch -- system-config-kickstart: Traceback on opening a nonexistent file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409554 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 129404] Re: Partition drives by percentage in Kickstart
I don't think that the underlying functionality in Kickstart exists to provide percentage-based partitioning. IMHO, that should be a prerequisite to enabling this in the system-config-kickstart interface. -- Partition drives by percentage in Kickstart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129404 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160792] Re: Add --ignoremissing support to %packages
Colin, Does the Debian equivalent of --ignoremissing exist? -- Add --ignoremissing support to %packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160792 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 129404] Re: Partition drives by percentage in Kickstart
To be more specific, kickstart will let you specify a percentage for creating an LVM volume, but not for non-LVM partitions. For reference: http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-5-manual /Installation_Guide-en-US/s1-kickstart2-options.html -- Partition drives by percentage in Kickstart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129404 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 464552] Re: suspend_test_finish warning triggers too easily, increase timeout to match mainline times
** Also affects: oem-priority Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: oem-priority Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: oem-priority Assignee: (unassigned) => Kevin Krafthefer (krafthefer) -- suspend_test_finish warning triggers too easily, increase timeout to match mainline times https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 449781] Re: [Karmic] Internal microphone does not record sound on a Dell Studio XPS
This may be a duplicate of LP #418617... -- [Karmic] Internal microphone does not record sound on a Dell Studio XPS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 418617] Re: Sound Prefrences applet does not offer a way for laptop users to use mic jack attached mic
This may be a duplicate of LP #449781... -- Sound Prefrences applet does not offer a way for laptop users to use mic jack attached mic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418617 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317474] Re: [Intrepid] Dell V505 AIO-Printer does not print
** Changed in: dell Status: New => Confirmed -- [Intrepid] Dell V505 AIO-Printer does not print https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317474 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413135] Re: Installer needs way to install PAE kernel on i386 9.10 DVD
** Changed in: dell Assignee: (unassigned) => Jerone Young (jerone) ** Changed in: dell Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: dell Status: New => In Progress -- Installer needs way to install PAE kernel on i386 9.10 DVD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413135 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 371461] Re: [Feature Request] Enable PAE in i386 generic kernel in 9.10
** Changed in: dell Status: New => Fix Released -- [Feature Request] Enable PAE in i386 generic kernel in 9.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 341526] Re: [Feature Request] Add support for Dell Driver Injection Disk
** Changed in: dell Status: New => In Progress -- [Feature Request] Add support for Dell Driver Injection Disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 371444] Re: [Feature Request] Add Wireless configuration screen to oem-config if wireless is available
Jerone, I'm curious to see if this is something that OEM Engineering could code up. ** Changed in: dell Status: New => Triaged -- [Feature Request] Add Wireless configuration screen to oem-config if wireless is available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371444 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 371444] Re: [Feature Request] Add Wireless configuration screen to oem-config if wireless is available
Assigning to Mike Terry based on Pat McGowan's input. ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Terry (mterry) -- [Feature Request] Add Wireless configuration screen to oem-config if wireless is available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371444 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 371444] Re: [Feature Request] Add Wireless configuration screen to oem-config if wireless is available
Jerone, this is a great test case to try out our new feature request justification document we created in the sprint. Can you put that together? Then we'll push this for Lucid. -- [Feature Request] Add Wireless configuration screen to oem-config if wireless is available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371444 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 458333] Re: Preseeding " d-i pkgsel/language-packs string ALL" is not keeping all language packages installed
** Changed in: oem-priority Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: oem-priority Status: New => Triaged -- Preseeding " d-i pkgsel/language-packs string ALL" is not keeping all language packages installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458333 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1245636] [NEW] Audio resumes from suspend on system lock screen
Public bug reported: Steps to reproduce: 1) Start playback of an audio file in Rhythmbox. 2) Suspend the system whilst the audio file is playing. 3) Wake the system from suspend, and the "password screen lock" dialog appears. Notice that the audio resumes playing before the user enters their password. My particular use-case problem was that I frequently suspend my laptop with my earbuds in (usually at high volume), and frequently resume the system with the earbuds removed. The volume hotkeys do not work during the password lock screen, so there's no way to mute the volume except by entering the password. During which time, the system is blaring music through the speakers. Upon discussing with other people, I am beginning to question whether the problem is not the volume hotkey buttons being inactive during password lock screen, but rather with the sound card itself being active during system lock screen. For example, Person A is listening to an audio recording containing sensitive information (a voice mail recording, for example), when they suspend their system and step away. Person B can resume Person A's system and listen to the rest of the audio file without entering any credentials. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1245636 Title: Audio resumes from suspend on system lock screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1245636/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 922968] Re: computer suspends again after resume
I'm seeing this behavior as well on a ThinkPad T400. I am running 12.04 LTS. bfox@bfox-laptop:/lib/modules/3.2.0-35-generic$ uname -a Linux bfox-laptop 3.2.0-35-generic-pae #55-Ubuntu SMP Wed Dec 5 18:04:39 UTC 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux I can reproduce the problem pretty much at will. The double-suspend problem is quite annoying. Please let me know what I can do to help diagnose the problem further. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922968 Title: computer suspends again after resume To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/922968/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 922968] Re: computer suspends again after resume
@jsalisbury: You are correct in that the system is simply doing what it is told, but it's still a bug in the user experience. The question is what the user is intending to do. Is the user intentionally telling the system to suspend twice? There's no use case in which that's useful. Then we have to consider the user experience. When the user opens the lid, they are telling the system to wake up because they intend to use it. They aren't expecting the system to put itself back to sleep, so this violates the principle of least surprise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922968 Title: shouldn't queue a second suspend if the machine is already suspending To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-power/+bug/922968/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 901630] Re: multitouch + qt doesn't work (eg fingerpaint demo) with wacom serial touchscreen
I have a 2740p, which I believe is just a smaller screen version of the model referenced in this bug report. I'm using 11.10. When I try to do a two-finger pinch or rotate, the system no longer recognizes any right-mouse clicks on the trackpad device. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Multitouch/HardwareSupport suggests using 'setserial' for this device, but I'm not sure how to do that. Any pointers? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/901630 Title: multitouch + qt doesn't work (eg fingerpaint demo) with wacom serial touchscreen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xf86-input-wacom/+bug/901630/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 878529] Re: 'smart' process load cpu on 100%
I'm seeing this behavior as well. I can use the workaround, but I would prefer a more permanent fix. Should I expect this to be addressed in a bugfix update? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878529 Title: 'smart' process load cpu on 100% To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/smart/+bug/878529/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 832643] Re: Unity/Compiz uses ~25% CPU with only a Terminal open (power regression)
Is this a duplicate of #887260? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/887260 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832643 Title: Unity/Compiz uses ~25% CPU with only a Terminal open (power regression) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/832643/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 632581] Re: Unity should facilitate end-user mapping of the Super key
The GConf key is GCONF_SUPER_KEY_ENABLE_KEY: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity/trunk/revision/540 I think this bug can be de-escalated from oem-priority now. OEM Svcs can create a workaround for our customers. -- Unity should facilitate end-user mapping of the Super key https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632581 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 604635] Re: [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant
So, if I could restate the request a bit: Goal: To have Ubuntu be Energy Star Compliant. Why?: Some customer tenders are beginning to list Energy Star Compliance as a requirement, therefore the OEMs must have an Energy Star compliant OS in order to respond to these tenders. Implementation Options: 1) Make Ubuntu's default settings comply with Energy Star requirements: * Put display to Sleep within 15 minutes of user inactivity when on A/C - Currently this is set to 30 min. * Activate computer's Sleep mode within 30 minutes of user inactivity when on A/C. - Currently this is set to "never" Cons: These settings may not be a desirable default for the majority of users 2) Add a new option to Gnome Power Management to toggle both settings at once with a checkbox: "Enable Energy Star Power Mode" or somesuch. I'm guessing the best place for that toggle would be under the "General" tab instead of "On AC Power" or "On DC Power". Cons: Requires UI changes that would likely need to be pushed upsteam. Also introduces new strings which would need to be translated. -- [Maverick] Have default settings be energy star 5.0 compliant https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604635 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 604765] Re: [Maverick] 32bit Ubuntu installer not calculating swap correctly for PAE systems
Let me make sure I understand the problem. Let's say a machine has 8GB of RAM. At install time, the boot kernel only sees 3GB of RAM, so it creates a 3GB swap partition. Then later, the installer detects that the PAE kernel is needed, so it installs it. After reboot, the user is able to address all 8GB of RAM, but now they have a swap partition that is not big enough to hold the contents of memory, therefore hibernate (suspending to disk) is likely to fail. Do I have that right? -- [Maverick] 32bit Ubuntu installer not calculating swap correctly for PAE systems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604765 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 614088] Re: unity should give an error to the user when not supported by the driver/graphic card
Jerone: Hang on a sec. Let's not frame this as a do-it-my-way-or-die issue. It's not helpful. Mario: We know which OEM configs will have good 3D support and which won't, right? Are there ways that we could automagically prevent the user from trying to start UNE on a config that we know doesn't have working 3D? Obviously that's less attractive than having the system intelligently fall back to a 2D UI, but I think we need to have a Plan B in case the DX team can't get that in place before release. -- unity should give an error to the user when not supported by the driver/graphic card https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614088 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
