[Bug 525662] [NEW] Dependency on c shell necessary?
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: emboss The emboss package (all Ubuntu versions available I believe) has csh listed as a dependency. In the changelog notes, it mentions this was added so tests can be run. This is a very minor issue, but it does seem a little extreme to require someone to install c-shell just for some tests. Can I put in a request that removing this dependency from the emboss packages be considered? thank you, Bela ** Affects: emboss (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Dependency on c shell necessary? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525662 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526347] [NEW] frestdist documentation should not be in emboss-doc
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: emboss-doc In the karmic release of emboss-doc, the documentation for a phylip program (i.e. an embassy, rather than emboss program) is included in the documentation: /usr/share/EMBOSS/doc/programs/text/frestdist.txt There may be others, I'm not sure. This causes a conflict if you try to install the embassy-phylip package, which contains the same file. emboss-doc should not contain this, or any other documentation for embassy software, as embassy software is not included in the main emboss release. This issue was fixed in the lucid emboss release. (embassy-phylip is only officially available for lucid.) ** Affects: emboss (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- frestdist documentation should not be in emboss-doc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526347 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526350] [NEW] libfontconfig1 - high version in embassy-phylip
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: embassy-phylip Hello, embassy-phylip is only officially available for lucid. It may be possible to install it on karmic, but the minimum version for libfontconfig, which is a dependency, is above what would be found on karmic systems normally. Is there any reason for the libfontconfig1 version number required to be so high? If not, would it be possible to have the version required set to a lower value? thanks, Bela ** Affects: embassy-phylip (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- libfontconfig1 - high version in embassy-phylip https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526350 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526356] [NEW] restrict and remap segmentation faults - lucid version on karmic system
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: emboss Hello, This may or may not be a "real" bug: I installed the lucid release of emboss (6.1.0-5: amd64) on an karmic (64 bit) system. On testing, some programs (e.g. seqret and emma) worked fine, but restrict and remap crashed out with segmentation faults. restrict and remap in the karmic emboss release (6.0.1-11) work fine. (I wanted to run the lucid version of emboss to get around another issue with conflicts between emboss-doc and embassy-phylip, described in a separate bug report). I'm not sure if the problem is that I'm on karmic, but if someone has chance, it might be worth checking that the lucid emboss package versions of restrict and remap work alright on a lucid system. cheers, Bela ** Affects: emboss (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- restrict and remap segmentation faults - lucid version on karmic system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526356] Re: restrict and remap segmentation faults - lucid version on karmic system
Hi Charles, Thanks for your swift response to this and to the other issues I reported. I think I had the latest libajax6 and libnucleus6 libraries, but I can't be sure. I'll try to look at this again and let you know. I think the machine I was using is being used for something else at the moment, but when it's free again... cheers, Bela -- restrict and remap segmentation faults - lucid version on karmic system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526356] Re: restrict and remap segmentation faults - lucid version on karmic system
Hi Charles, Related to the above: the version numbers for the lucid build of emboss is lower than for the karmic build. I'm not sure how this should be interpreted really. It certainly leads me to have doubts about the versions of libajax6 and libnucleus6 I may have had installed at any given point in testing. cheers, Bela -- restrict and remap segmentation faults - lucid version on karmic system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 527019] [NEW] em_pscan and em_cons not found for jemboss
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: jemboss Hello, I suspect this is a known issue but: with the Ubuntu emboss packages opting for the new binary names em_pscan and em_cons, the karmic version of Jemboss does not offer these programs. (I haven't looked at any other version of the Jemboss package). cheers, Bela ** Affects: emboss (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- em_pscan and em_cons not found for jemboss https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
