[Bug 1221138] [NEW] package linux-image-3.5.0-39-generic 3.5.0-39.60~precise1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17
Public bug reported: unable to install properly linux kernel 3.5.0-39 heee I get errors when updding Graphviz installArchives() failed: (Reading database ... (Reading database ... 5%% (Reading database ... 10%% (Reading database ... 15%% (Reading database ... 20%% (Reading database ... 25%% (Reading database ... 30%% (Reading database ... 35%% (Reading database ... 40%% (Reading database ... 45%% (Reading database ... 50%% (Reading database ... 55%% (Reading database ... 60%% (Reading database ... 65%% (Reading database ... 70%% (Reading database ... 75%% (Reading database ... 80%% (Reading database ... 85%% (Reading database ... 90%% (Reading database ... 95%% (Reading database ... 100%% (Reading database ... 1327697 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace boot-sav 3.199~ppa24~precise (using .../boot-sav_3.199~ppa25~precise_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement boot-sav ... Preparing to replace boot-repair 3.199~ppa24~precise (using .../boot-repair_3.199~ppa25~precise_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement boot-repair ... Preparing to replace boot-sav-extra 3.199~ppa24~precise (using .../boot-sav-extra_3.199~ppa25~precise_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement boot-sav-extra ... Preparing to replace libgraphviz-dev 2.33.20130903.0446-1~precise (using .../libgraphviz-dev_2.33.20130905.0447-1~precise_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libgraphviz-dev ... Preparing to replace libgraphviz4 2.33.20130903.0446-1~precise (using .../libgraphviz4_2.33.20130905.0447-1~precise_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libgraphviz4 ... Preparing to replace graphviz 2.33.20130903.0446-1~precise (using .../graphviz_2.33.20130905.0447-1~precise_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement graphviz ... Preparing to replace graphviz-dev 2.33.20130903.0446-1~precise (using .../graphviz-dev_2.33.20130905.0447-1~precise_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement graphviz-dev ... Preparing to replace libgv-guile 2.33.20130903.0446-1~precise (using .../libgv-guile_2.33.20130905.0447-1~precise_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libgv-guile ... Preparing to replace libgv-lua 2.33.20130903.0446-1~precise (using .../libgv-lua_2.33.20130905.0447-1~precise_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libgv-lua ... Preparing to replace libgv-ocaml 2.33.20130903.0446-1~precise (using .../libgv-ocaml_2.33.20130905.0447-1~precise_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libgv-ocaml ... Preparing to replace libgv-perl 2.33.20130903.0446-1~precise (using .../libgv-perl_2.33.20130905.0447-1~precise_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libgv-perl ... Preparing to replace libgv-php5 2.33.20130903.0446-1~precise (using .../libgv-php5_2.33.20130905.0447-1~precise_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libgv-php5 ... Preparing to replace libgv-python 2.33.20130903.0446-1~precise (using .../libgv-python_2.33.20130905.0447-1~precise_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libgv-python ... Preparing to replace libgv-ruby 2.33.20130903.0446-1~precise (using .../libgv-ruby_2.33.20130905.0447-1~precise_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libgv-ruby ... Preparing to replace libgv-tcl 2.33.20130903.0446-1~precise (using .../libgv-tcl_2.33.20130905.0447-1~precise_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libgv-tcl ... Preparing to replace os-uninstaller 3.199~ppa24~precise (using .../os-uninstaller_3.199~ppa25~precise_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement os-uninstaller ... Processing triggers for bamfdaemon ... Rebuilding /usr/share/applications/bamf.index... Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils ... Processing triggers for gnome-menus ... Processing triggers for man-db ... Processing triggers for menu ... Setting up linux-image-3.5.0-39-generic (3.5.0-39.60~precise1) ... Running depmod. update-initramfs: deferring update (hook will be called later) Failed to symbolic-link /boot/initrd.img-3.5.0-39-generic to initrd.img:File exists at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-3.5.0-39-generic.postinst line 614. dpkg: error processing linux-image-3.5.0-39-generic (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-image-generic-lts-quantal: linux-image-generic-lts-quantal depends on linux-image-3.5.0-39-generic; however: Package linux-image-3.5.0-39-generic is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing linux-image-generic-lts-quantal (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Setting up boot-sav (3.199~ppa25~precise) ... No apport report written because the error message indicates its a followup error from a previous failure. Setting up boot-repair (3.199~ppa25~precise) ... Setting up boot-sav-extra (3.199~ppa25~precise) ... Setting up libgraphviz4 (2.33.20130905.0447-1~precise) ... Setting up libgraphviz-dev (2.33.20130905.0447-1~precise) ... Setting up graphviz (2.33.20130905.0447-1~precise) ... Setting up graphviz-dev (2.33.20130905.0447-1~precise) ... Setting up libgv-guile (2.33.20130905.0447-1~precise) ... Setting up libgv-lua (2.33.2
[Bug 1221138] Re: package linux-image-3.5.0-39-generic 3.5.0-39.60~precise1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17
Well, there is indeed a bug in the file /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux- image-3.5.0-39-generic.postinst I substituted all (four) occurrences of pwd in /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux- image-3.2.0-34-generic.postinst with getcwd() and now everything seems to work ... The solution is explained at large @ http://askubuntu.com/questions/233798/linux-image-generic-seems-to-be- broken pwd doesn't work from within perl apparently, it just returns an empty string. In any case, I'm fairly certain that it's a bug that the postinst script calls pwd instead of using Perl's own Cwd like it ought to. pwd is a bash shell command line / bourne shell. Would you please update the linux-image-3.5.0-39-generic.postinst script accordingly ? and the bug status if I couldn't update it. Thanks. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1221138 Title: package linux-image-3.5.0-39-generic 3.5.0-39.60~precise1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1221138/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1221138] Re: package linux-image-3.5.0-39-generic 3.5.0-39.60~precise1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17
In my case it was a substitution in /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux- image-3.5.0-39-generic.postinst Not the /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-3.2.0-34-generic.postinst mentionned on the askubuntu.com website. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1221138 Title: package linux-image-3.5.0-39-generic 3.5.0-39.60~precise1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1221138/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1221138] Re: package linux-image-3.5.0-39-generic 3.5.0-39.60~precise1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17
The relevant error message was (from the reported error above) Failed to symbolic-link /boot/initrd.img-3.5.0-39-generic to initrd.img:File exists at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux- image-3.5.0-39-generic.postinst line 614. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1221138 Title: package linux-image-3.5.0-39-generic 3.5.0-39.60~precise1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1221138/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1221138] Re: package linux-image-3.5.0-39-generic 3.5.0-39.60~precise1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17
A couple of days before I installed the kernel 3.5.0-40 through the regular Ubuntu Update process and all went fine. I did check the /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-3.5.0-40-generic.postrm file and it still sported the 4 occurences of pwd in this instruction : chomp($cwd = `pwd`); When first installing the Quantal kernel backport there was no problem and subsequent updates went fine. However the automatic update process did install a 3.5.0 kernel recent version (far above the 40 currently supported). I did not pay attention to the GRUB boot screen which was still showing that the 3.5.0-39 was used by my Ubuntu 12.04 system and I removed as usual the older(s) kernels from my /boot partition. Following this I had to boot through th regular 3.2 kernel and I did re-install the kernel 3.5.0-39 through the following precedure coming from an official Ubuntu website : 1) Add the X-team ppa (https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/q-lts-backport) sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntu-x-swat/q-lts-backport 2) Update apt and install the new kernel sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install linux-image-generic-lts-quantal linux-headers-generic-lts-quantal 3) Restart your computer to boot into the new kernel However I was faced with the reported bug : package linux-image-3.5.0-39-generic 3.5.0-39.60~precise1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17 Only after replacing all occurences of pwd by getcwd() within /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-3.2.0-34-generic.postinst , did I succeed to re-install the Quantal backport of 3.5.0-39 in Precise 12.04 For information before re-installing I did the following to remove the Quantal kernel : 1) Install ppa-purge sudo apt-get install ppa-purge 2) Remove the ppa sudo ppa-purge ppa:ubuntu-x-swat/q-lts-backport 3) PPA Purge will find the packages installed and offered to downgrade them. Say yes and ppa-purge will remove the upgraded versions and reinstall the versions from the archive. 4) Remove the meta packages sudo apt-get remove --purge linux-image-generic-lts-quantal linux-headers-generic-lts-quantal 5) Remove the kernel itself. While running the new kernel, enter the following command uname -r This returns a number, like '3.5.0-8-generic'. Use the number (3.5.0-8) to replace the word KERNEL sudo apt-get remove --purge linux-image-KERNEL-generic linux-headers-KERNEL linux-headers-KERNEL-generic sudo apt-get autoremove Eg, for '3.5.0-8' sudo apt-get remove --purge linux-image-3.5.0-8-generic linux-headers-3.5.0-8 linux-headers-3.5.0-8 In short the used : chomp($cwd = `pwd`); is working as it did before, however I am not sure weather the problem would re-appear following a full un-install / re-install. the solution was to use : chomp($cwd=`getcwd()`); -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1221138 Title: package linux-image-3.5.0-39-generic 3.5.0-39.60~precise1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1221138/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1300506] [NEW] emacs24 while byte compiling will keep asking for a shared lib not existing in my system
Public bug reported: I was running emacs24 on Precise 12.04 after an install from this ppa @ https://launchpad.net/~cassou/+archive/emacs Install worked fine. Until recently when installing new programs (SuperCollider) which were byte compiling for emacs24. For some mysterious reason at that time emacs24 was trying to open a shared library libgvc.so.6 which was never present in my system for a good reason : It will be on the soon to be released Trusty 14.04. The library is libgvc.so.6 which is part of a Graphviz package libgvc6. At that time I had subscribed to the GraphvizDev ppa @ https://launchpad.net/~gviz-adm/+archive/graphviz-dev which later on forbid me to intall the package python-pygraphviz . Then I decided to remove this ppa and install Graphviz from the regular Precise 12.04 repository for packages graphviz libcdt4 libgraphviz-dev libcgraph5 libgvc5. This later package libgvc5 contains the shared lib libgvc.so.5 . Here is the error message : [...] Install cmake-data for emacs24 install/cmake-data: Byte-compiling for emacs24 emacs24: error while loading shared libraries: libgvc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Install dictionaries-common for emacs24 install/dictionaries-common: Byte-compiling for emacsen flavour emacs24 emacs24: error while loading shared libraries: libgvc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory ERROR: install script from dictionaries-common package failed dpkg: error processing emacs24 (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Setting up emacs24-common-non-dfsg (24.3+1-1~ppa1~precise1) ... E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) $ I tried to remove alltogether Graphviz and cmake ... to no avail. Does anyone know why emacs24 keeps asking for this particular shared lib ? I tried to install the packages from Trusty 14.04 as well but didn't go far as it's a chain of broken dependencies. Whem removing emacs24 , the system re-install emacs23 and there is no problem in byte compiling all the installed apps. Why was it working for some days then suddenly asking for a non existent shared lib ? Can anyone sheds light on this ? Is there any workaround ? At the moment I returned to emacs23. ** Affects: emacs24 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: I was running emacs24 on Precise 12.04 after an install from this ppa @ https://launchpad.net/~cassou/+archive/emacs Install worked fine. Until recently when installing new programs (SuperCollider) which were byte compiling for emacs24. For some mysterious reason at that time emacs24 was trying to open a shared library libgvc.so.6 which was never present in my system for a - good reason : It will be on the soon to be releases Trustty 14.04. The + good reason : It will be on the soon to be released Trustty 14.04. The library is libgvc.so.6 which is part of a Graphviz package libgvc6. At that time I had subscribed to the GraphvizDev ppa @ https://launchpad.net/~gviz-adm/+archive/graphviz-dev which later on forbid me to intall the package python-pygraphviz . Then I decided to remove this ppa and install Graphviz from th regular Precise 12.04 repository for packages graphviz libcdt4 libgraphviz-dev libcgraph5 libgvc5. This later package libgvc5 contains the shared lib libgvc.so.5 . Here is the error message : [...] Install cmake-data for emacs24 install/cmake-data: Byte-compiling for emacs24 emacs24: error while loading shared libraries: libgvc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Install dictionaries-common for emacs24 install/dictionaries-common: Byte-compiling for emacsen flavour emacs24 emacs24: error while loading shared libraries: libgvc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory ERROR: install script from dictionaries-common package failed dpkg: error processing emacs24 (--configure): - subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 + subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Setting up emacs24-common-non-dfsg (24.3+1-1~ppa1~precise1) ... E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) - $ + $ I tried to remove alltogether Graphviz and cmake ... to no avail. Does anyone know why emacs24 keeps asking for this particular shared lib ? I tried to install the packages from Trusty 14.04 as well but didn't go far as it's a chain of broken dependencies. Whem removing emacs24 , the system re-install emacs23 and there is no problem in byte compiling all the installed apps. Why was it working for some days then suddenly asking for a non existent shared lib ? Can anyone sheds light on this ? Is there any workaround ? At the moment I returned to emacs23. ** Description changed: I was running emacs24 on Precise 12.04 after an install from this ppa @ https://launchp
[Bug 1300506] Re: emacs24 while byte compiling will keep asking for a shared lib not existing in my system
I have looked to the shared libraries cache and there is no trace (as expected) of the library reported as missing libgvc.so.6 (this is a symlink to libgvc.so.6.0.0 the actual lib). $ ldconfig -p | grep libgvc libgvc.so.5 (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib/libgvc.so.5 libgvc.so (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib/libgvc.so $ $ cd / $ $ locate libgvc.so.5 /usr/lib/libgvc.so.5 /usr/lib/libgvc.so.5.0.0 $ locate libgvc.so.6 $ To cir-convent this bug I resorted to make a symlink libgvc6.0 $ sudo ln -sv libgvc.so.5.0.0 /usr/lib/libgvc.so.6 $ ls -l /usr/lib/libgvc* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Jan 14 14:42 /usr/lib/libgvc.so -> libgvc.so.5.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Jan 14 14:42 /usr/lib/libgvc.so.5 -> libgvc.so.5.0.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 506184 Jan 14 14:42 /usr/lib/libgvc.so.5.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Apr 1 16:02 /usr/lib/libgvc.so.6 -> libgvc.so.5 $ However this is not a regular procedure. I would like to know where the request from emacs24 install comes from ? for a non-existent shared library. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1300506 Title: emacs24 while byte compiling will keep asking for a shared lib not existing in my system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacs24/+bug/1300506/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1291092] Re: New upstream version 0.3.2 available
Well thank you for all the good work, however one the package listed as Dependency is unknow to Ubuntu repository htt://packages.ubuntu.com ... The package is : libgit2-glib-1.0-dev (>= 0.0.10) Where can I get this one ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291092 Title: New upstream version 0.3.2 available To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gitg/+bug/1291092/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555238] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in jpc_qmfb_join_colgrp()
Just an update on my previous post. I discovered that even when building new jpeg2000 images (format .j2k) from any version installed (1.3, 1.5 or 2.0.0), Nautilus or Nemo will crash when opening the containing folder of some of these images (not all ...). The solution is simple : You have first to open these images with GIMP. Ounce GIMP has open these images their thumbnail is displayed by Nautilus / Nemo and does not crash ... May be there is some investigation to perform on this ... on the part of the plug-in used in Nautilus / Nemo. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555238 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in jpc_qmfb_join_colgrp() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jasper/+bug/555238/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1407372] [NEW] Blurry Font Bug from GTK+ 3.10.8 in Trusty 14.04
Public bug reported: Following a fresh install of Ubuntu Trusty 14.04 I had the surprise to see blurry fonts showing up in gEdit (stock install), when the document viewed is longer than a displayed vertical or horizontal page. I later found it was reported as a bug in Launchpad as "blurry font as document is longer than one page and scroll bars appear", see: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/1309785 This GTK+ 3.10.8 bug was reported as corrected in September 2014 in in GTK+ 3.13.7 . However someone reported a work-around which consisted of adding an "env" parameter to the Exec command line in the gedit.desktop file. # Exec=gedit %U Exec=env GTK_DEBUG=no-pixel-cache gedit %U It looks like the displayed information on a selected package in Synaptic shows the same behavior i.e. Selecting package "0ad" will show a perfect font rendering in the package info field. However selecting package "0ad-data" which description is slightly longer and will not fit in the panel window, will display then a blurred font. I tried the same "env GTK_DEBUG=no-pixel-cache" to synaptic cmd. line however this is not working. Considering that Trusty 14.04 is a LTS release, does anyone knows which env parameter would fix this bug ? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: synaptic 0.81.1ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/applications/synaptic.desktop] ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-43.72-generic 3.13.11.11 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-43-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.6 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Sat Jan 3 21:14:20 2015 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-12-19 (15 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140722.2) SourcePackage: synaptic UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: synaptic (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug third-party-packages trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1407372 Title: Blurry Font Bug from GTK+ 3.10.8 in Trusty 14.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/1407372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1135394] Re: qtconfig isn't getting built
It looks like on Aug 9, 2013 1:17 PM the status of this bug has been updated to "Abandoned". Another link is provided as a problem bug to be solved first but the link is a dead one now : HTTP Error 404 Not found. Author Dmitry Shachnev : The !qpa check must probably be replaced with something else (!mobile?), but I'm not sure about that. Reviewer Oswald Buddenhagen : I would prefer that you didn't submit this you didn't add reviewers, so you didn't get a review so far ... please split the patch into atomic commits (basically, one per bullet point). Author Dmitry Shachnev : Sorry, I just didn't have time to finish this — qtconfig didn't actually save most of settings. I'm not going to enable qtconfig until that issue is solved, so the only part that makes sense to be done now is the second one — pushed as https://codereview.qt-project.org/62702. Author Dmitry Shachnev : Abandoned. We are nowhere close to see anything coming then. This means that we can't set the default font and font size for all Qt5 apps in Ubuntu / Debian like we used to with Qt4. The App was Qt 4 Settings and the package was qt4-qtconfig ... This is quite annoying as from the end user I don't know where Qt5 is picking up its default font and font size. In my case it's way too big a size. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135394 Title: qtconfig isn't getting built To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qttools-opensource-src/+bug/1135394/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1126210] Re: GTK theme information not used (was: Fonts look non-optimal in Qt Creator)
Anyone knows if this fix has been applied to Precise 12.04 LTS for the current Qt 5.0.2 ? The font size displayed in my Qt5 apps is way too big on my system. I used to get it right in Qt4 with the app Qt 4 Settings (package qt40qtconfig) which is not available for Qt5. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1126210 Title: GTK theme information not used (was: Fonts look non-optimal in Qt Creator) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-src/+bug/1126210/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555238] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in jpc_qmfb_join_colgrp()
My 2 cents on this "bug" after experementing 3 versions of OpenJPEG release. [http://www.openjpeg.org/] The official version released in any Debian or Ubuntu distribution is libopenjpeg2_1.3+dfsg [...]. This package is build from version 1.3 of the source code from the Google Code project http://code.google.com/p/openjpeg/ Since then they have released version 1.4, 1.5, 1.5.1 and 2.0.0. My own experience for having installed version 1.3, 1.5 and 2.0.0 is that the compressed images j2k are not compatible between versions. You end up with a crash in the jasper package. See their Canadian website @ http://www.ece.uvic.ca/~frodo/jasper/ However for some reason when another version is installed jasper crashed and following this crash Nautilus or Nemo crash as well. Aside from the jasper / nautilus - nemo trouble between different OpenPEG versions, GIMP or GPicView had no problem opening j2k images from other versions of OpenJPEG. When recompressing the source images to j2k with the new version I idn't get any crash. However the thumbnail will not show up on some images ... all thumbnails only appear with the official v1.3 version still part of the latest distibutions from Ubuntu or Debian. See their website for experimenting on samples http://www.openjpeg.org/index.php?menu=samples -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555238 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in jpc_qmfb_join_colgrp() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jasper/+bug/555238/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1205898] Re: Network printing fails in 12.04 on KONICA MINOLTA mc1650 PPD
After some research I managed to get the connection (it looks like) : $ sudo cp -r mc1650en_linux_ppd_v004/english usr/share/cups/model $ sudo chmod -R 775 /usr/share/cups/model/english/ $ sudo service cups restart 1. Start up the Web browser. 2. Enter the URL “http://localhost:631”, and then click Manage Printers. The CUPS Administration Web page appears. Turn On the printer. 3. Click Adding Printers and Classes Under Printers click Add printer Select KONICA MINOLTAmagicolor 1650(CF:A5:6E) (KONICA MINOLTA KONICA MINOLTA magicolor 1650) Then click Administration Tab and clcik Manage Printers. Select mc1650 Description : KONICA MINOLTA magicolor 1650 Name : mc1650 IP Address of the printer is 192.168.1.51 and Connection should be : AppSocket/HP Jet-Direct Device URL : http://192.168.1.51:9100 Otherwise you can modify the printer from System Settings --> Printer Double click the printer's name : mc1650 Device URl = socket://192.168.1.51:9100 However there is a problem with CUPS backend socket as Printer State = Idle - /usr/lib/cups/backend/socket failed Don't know why CUPS socket fails. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205898 Title: Network printing fails in 12.04 on KONICA MINOLTA mc1650 PPD To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1205898/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1205898] Re: Network printing fails in 12.04 on KONICA MINOLTA mc1650 PPD
[Follow On] After a [Print Test Page] click I looked at the CUPS error log and the only line related to the failed job launch was $ tail -f /var/log/cups/error_log E [11/Feb/2014:14:43:05 -0500] PID 7976 (/usr/lib/cups/backend/socket) crashed on signal 6. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205898 Title: Network printing fails in 12.04 on KONICA MINOLTA mc1650 PPD To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1205898/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 673350] Re: Can't install emacs23
I am now encountering the same bug in Precise 12.04 after removing a "not empty" /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/ directory while un-installing emacs24 ... The previous post is usefull however the 3 files debian-ispell.el, flyspell.el and ipsell.el were installed. The only file missing was debian-startup.el . The best solution was to install a dedicated package conteining this file : emacsen-common I am still left with other packages problem since I did a $ sudo apt-get install --reinstall dictionaries-common -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673350 Title: Can't install emacs23 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacs-snapshot/+bug/673350/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 673350] Re: Can't install emacs23
[Follow-up]] I had to sometimes recreate the /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/[package-name] Then re-install the package [package-name] containing the .el file Then success for re-installing emacs24 . However now all the icons for the menu buttons on top of the window are gone ... (red cross) except for File ... Another thing to look-up. And I am short on solution for it. No icon is displayed even in the system window to open or save a file the standard buttons are red crosses. Somehow emacs has no access to the system standard icons ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673350 Title: Can't install emacs23 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacs-snapshot/+bug/673350/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 673350] Re: Can't install emacs23
Clarification : The 3 files debian-ispell.el, flyspell.el and ipsell.el from /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/dictionaries-common will be re-installed with this command $ sudo apt-get install --reinstall dictionaries-common The file /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/debian-startup.el will be restored by installing package emacsen-common $ sudo apt-get install emacsen-common If any other package related .el file was deleted / removed then you will have to re-create the directory name as the error gives its name. This was the case for cmake on my machine. $ sudo mkdir /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/[package-name] Then re-install the [pacage-name] containing the .el file when an error is poppping up for that particular package. In my case re-installing from the following ppa https://launchpad.net/~cassou/+archive/emacs gave me back a fully working emacs24 installation. I still have a problem with my own compilation and build of the packages for missing link to system icons ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673350 Title: Can't install emacs23 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacs-snapshot/+bug/673350/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 959836] Re: Needs to distribute sources instead of precompiled libraries
Nice. Canonical / Ubuntu has enough sway to impose the removal of libraries which would break their MIR. In theory the source files are copied in /usr/src/xorg-gtest and part of the dev package. In reality this code as such is un-usable. So may be it is better to remove entirely all xorg packages ? to let go MIR ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959836 Title: Needs to distribute sources instead of precompiled libraries To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-gtest/+bug/959836/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1107347] [NEW] package texlive-metapost 2009-15 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Description:Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS Release:12.04 Architeture: amd64 $ apt-cache policy texlive-metapost texlive-metapost: Installed: 2009-15 Candidate: 2009-15 Version table: *** 2009-15 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status The day before I installed TeX Live 2012 by running their installation script. Everything was OK and working fine. Then today I tried to install the package asymptote (which interfaces with LaTeX) and package context at the same time from a CLI. A lot of other pacakages were needed, one of them was texlive-metapost. $ sudo apt-get install asymptote context During the install process in the Terminal I had this first error message: --- [...] Setting up tex-gyre (2.004.1-2.1ubuntu1) ... Setting up python-imaging-tk (1.1.7-4) ... Setting up asymptote (2.15-1) ... Setting up asymptote-doc (2.15-1) ... Setting up texlive-metapost (2009-15) ... Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done. Building format(s) --all --cnffile /etc/texmf/fmt.d/10texlive-metapost.cnf. This may take some time... fmtutil-sys failed. Output has been stored in /tmp/fmtutil.vNuqvnl8 Please include this file if you report a bug. --- Then the error messages pertaining to dpkg [consequence of the above] --- dpkg: error processing texlive-metapost (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of context: context depends on texlive-metapost (>= 2009); however: Package texlive-metapost is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing context (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of context-modules: context-modules depends on context; however: Package context is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing context-modules (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Setting up feynmf (1.08-7) ... No apport report written because the error message indicates its a followup error from a previous failure. No apport report written because the error message indicates its a followup error from a previous failure. --- Then the others post-installation processes terminating without problems --- Setting up fonts-gfs-artemisia (1.1-4) ... Setting up fonts-gfs-baskerville (1.1-4) ... Setting up fonts-gfs-bodoni-classic (1.1-4) ... Setting up fonts-gfs-didot (1.1-5) ... Setting up fonts-gfs-didot-classic (1.1-4) ... Setting up fonts-gfs-gazis (1.1-4) ... Setting up fonts-gfs-neohellenic (1.1-4) ... Setting up fonts-gfs-olga (1.1-3) ... Setting up fonts-gfs-porson (1.1-5) ... Setting up fonts-gfs-solomos (1.1-4) ... Setting up fonts-gfs-theokritos (1.1-4) ... Setting up fonts-sil-gentium (20081126:1.02-12) ... Setting up texlive-metapost-doc (2009-15) ... Setting up ttf-gfs-artemisia (1.1-4) ... Setting up ttf-gfs-baskerville (1.1-4) ... Setting up ttf-gfs-bodoni-classic (1.1-4) ... Setting up ttf-gfs-didot (1.1-5) ... Setting up ttf-gfs-didot-classic (1.1-4) ... Setting up ttf-gfs-gazis (1.1-4) ... Setting up ttf-gfs-neohellenic (1.1-4) ... Setting up ttf-gfs-olga (1.1-3) ... Setting up ttf-gfs-porson (1.1-5) ... Setting up ttf-gfs-solomos (1.1-4) ... Setting up ttf-gfs-theokritos (1.1-4) ... Setting up ttf-sil-gentium (20081126:1.02-12) ... Processing triggers for tex-common ... Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done. Running updmap-sys. This may take some time... done. Running mktexlsr /var/lib/texmf ... done. Errors were encountered while processing: texlive-metapost context context-modules E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) --- The error message in /tmp/fmtutil.vNuqvnl8 reads as: --
[Bug 887446] Re: mlabel: renaming USB stick appends "nA" to name
Still present in Precise 12.04.1 LTS. It looks like the Ubuntu folks did however correct the issue in the mtools package for Quental & Raring ... Your best option is to download the mtools package (verson 4.0.17) from either Quentalor Raring as it's the same version. http://packages.ubuntu.com/quantal/mtools And install it with Ubuntu Software Center or Synaptic, then the problem is confirmed as solved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887446 Title: mlabel: renaming USB stick appends "nA" to name To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mtools/+bug/887446/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1159288] [NEW] GParted hang while Scanning all devices for 10 to 15 mn
Public bug reported: sudo blkid command hangs as well and does not return anything in an acceptable time. when trying to launch gparted from the command line I get an error message. If I close the hanging window of gparted "Scanning all devices..." then when attempting a relaunch it crash at startup. I had this kind of behaviour before for blkid and later on it reverted to a normal behaviour. Now again blkid is not working and gparted is for the first time not working as well. e.g. I have to wait for 10 to 15 mn to get it up and running. This erratic behaviour of blkid and gparted is unerving. I am running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS ** Affects: gparted (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159288 Title: GParted hang while Scanning all devices for 10 to 15 mn To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/1159288/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1037849] Re: gnome-color-manager has nowhere to start from
I can attest that gnome-color-manager successfuly installed in Precise 12.04.2 LTS. However there is no way to launch the application : $ gnome-color-manager gnome-color-manager: command not found Even after installing the suggested package (+ dependencies) from the Qunatal release ... ** Also affects: gnome-color-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1037849 Title: gnome-color-manager has nowhere to start from To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-color-manager/+bug/1037849/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 937200] Re: Fat fonts in Swing applications
@blackslad & Nick B: Thanks. That worked :) However you do not need to have java-6-sun installed. I just downloaded the latest Oracle update for Java 6 : jdk-6u43-linux-x64.bin from their website http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jdk6downloads-1902814.html Then just make it executable and extract it in a local folder like Downloads $ chmod +x jdk-6u43-linux-x64.bin $ ./jdk-6u43-linux-x64.bin Then copy the 2 files to the working Java 7 installation $ sudo cp ~/Downloads/jdk1.6.0_41/jre/lib/fontconfig.Ubuntu.* /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle/jre/lib/ That fixed the flaw instantly. Obviously you should keep these 2 files as you will need them each time you update your Oracle Java. fontconfig.Ubuntu.bfc fontconfig.Ubuntu.properties.src It looks like Oracle only keeped the fontconfig for the Red Hat based (rpm) distributions and bumped the only Debian [Ubuntu]. Their own Linux version being Red Hat based (rpm). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937200 Title: Fat fonts in Swing applications To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-unfonts-core/+bug/937200/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169597] [NEW] Wrong dependencies for Raring13.04
Public bug reported: from http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/libnetcdf6 one of the dependence of libnetcdf6 [Raring] : "libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 Hierarchical Data Format 5 (HDF5) - runtime files - serial version or libhdf5-1.8.4 virtual package provided by libhdf5-lam-1.8.4, libhdf5-mpich-1.8.4, libhdf5-openmpi-1.8.4, libhdf5-serial-1.8.4" However the dependencies / conflicts of package libhdf5-7 [Raring] from the package itself is : "Conflicts: libhdf5-1.8, libhdf5-1.8.4, libhdf5-1.8.6, libhdf5-1.8.7, libhdf5-7, libhdf5-serial-1.8.4, libhdf5-serial-1.8.6, libhdf5-serial-1.8.7 Replaces: libhdf5-1.8.4, libhdf5-1.8.6, libhdf5-1.8.7, libhdf5-serial-1.8.4, libhdf5-serial-1.8.6, libhdf5-serial-1.8.7 Provides: libhdf5-1.8, libhdf5-7" I encountered this when trying to upgrade to package libnetcdf6 from Raring. Previously I had to install pckage libhdf5-7 [Raring], however since it conflicts and replaces libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 I had to remove it. However it appears that package libnetcdf6 [Raring] IS NOT AWARE that libhdf5-7 replaces libhdf5-1.8.4 and libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 Hence I am holding "broken packages". I was upgrading to the latest matplotlib in Precise to those of raring issuing the command : $ sudo dpkg -i python-matplotlib_1.2.0-1_amd64.deb python-matplotlib- data_1.2.0-1_all.deb fonts-lyx_2.0.3-3_all.deb python- numpy_1.7.0-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb python-glade2_2.24.0-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb python-gtk2_2.24.0-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb python-pygame_1.9.1release+dfsg- 8_amd64.deb libblas3_1.2.20110419-5_amd64.deb liblapack3_3.4.2-1~exp3_amd64.deb octave_3.6.4-1_amd64.deb libatlas3gf- base_3.8.4-9ubuntu1_all.deb libfftw3-double3_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb libfftw3-single3_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb libblas3gf_1.2.20110419-5_all.deb liblapack3gf_3.4.2-1~exp3_all.deb libfftw3-3_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb liboctave1_3.6.4-1_amd64.deb octave- common_3.6.4-1_all.deb libgl2ps0_1.3.6-1_amd64.deb libhdf5-7_1.8.9-1~exp3_amd64.deb libnetcdf6_4.1.1-6_amd64.deb libatlas3-base_3.8.4-9ubuntu1_amd64.deb dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libnetcdf6: libnetcdf6 depends on libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 | libhdf5-1.8.4; however: Package libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 is not installed. Package libhdf5-1.8.4 is not installed. Package libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 which provides libhdf5-1.8.4 is not installed. dpkg: error processing libnetcdf6 (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: libatlas3-base_3.8.4-9ubuntu1_amd64.deb libatlas3gf-base libnetcdf6 Can you please fix the dependencies in package "libnetcdf6 [Raring]" ? ** Affects: netcdf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: dependencies wrong -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169597 Title: Wrong dependencies for Raring13.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netcdf/+bug/1169597/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169597] Re: Wrong dependencies for Raring13.04
** Description changed: from http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/libnetcdf6 one of the dependence of libnetcdf6 [Raring] : "libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 - Hierarchical Data Format 5 (HDF5) - runtime files - serial version + Hierarchical Data Format 5 (HDF5) - runtime files - serial version or libhdf5-1.8.4 - virtual package provided by libhdf5-lam-1.8.4, libhdf5-mpich-1.8.4, libhdf5-openmpi-1.8.4, libhdf5-serial-1.8.4" + virtual package provided by libhdf5-lam-1.8.4, libhdf5-mpich-1.8.4, libhdf5-openmpi-1.8.4, libhdf5-serial-1.8.4" However the dependencies / conflicts of package libhdf5-7 [Raring] from the package itself is : "Conflicts: libhdf5-1.8, libhdf5-1.8.4, libhdf5-1.8.6, libhdf5-1.8.7, libhdf5-7, libhdf5-serial-1.8.4, libhdf5-serial-1.8.6, libhdf5-serial-1.8.7 Replaces: libhdf5-1.8.4, libhdf5-1.8.6, libhdf5-1.8.7, libhdf5-serial-1.8.4, libhdf5-serial-1.8.6, libhdf5-serial-1.8.7 Provides: libhdf5-1.8, libhdf5-7" I encountered this when trying to upgrade to package libnetcdf6 from Raring. Previously I had to install pckage libhdf5-7 [Raring], however since it conflicts and replaces libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 I had to remove it. However it appears that package libnetcdf6 [Raring] IS NOT AWARE that - libhdf5-7 replaces libhdf5-1.8.7 + libhdf5-7 replaces libhdf5-1.8.4 and libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 Hence I am holding "broken packages". I was upgrading to the latest matplotlib in Precise to those of raring issuing the command : $ sudo dpkg -i python-matplotlib_1.2.0-1_amd64.deb python-matplotlib- data_1.2.0-1_all.deb fonts-lyx_2.0.3-3_all.deb python- numpy_1.7.0-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb python-glade2_2.24.0-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb python-gtk2_2.24.0-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb python-pygame_1.9.1release+dfsg- 8_amd64.deb libblas3_1.2.20110419-5_amd64.deb liblapack3_3.4.2-1~exp3_amd64.deb octave_3.6.4-1_amd64.deb libatlas3gf- base_3.8.4-9ubuntu1_all.deb libfftw3-double3_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb libfftw3-single3_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb libblas3gf_1.2.20110419-5_all.deb liblapack3gf_3.4.2-1~exp3_all.deb libfftw3-3_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb liboctave1_3.6.4-1_amd64.deb octave- common_3.6.4-1_all.deb libgl2ps0_1.3.6-1_amd64.deb libhdf5-7_1.8.9-1~exp3_amd64.deb libnetcdf6_4.1.1-6_amd64.deb libatlas3-base_3.8.4-9ubuntu1_amd64.deb dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libnetcdf6: - libnetcdf6 depends on libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 | libhdf5-1.8.4; however: - Package libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 is not installed. - Package libhdf5-1.8.4 is not installed. - Package libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 which provides libhdf5-1.8.4 is not installed. + libnetcdf6 depends on libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 | libhdf5-1.8.4; however: + Package libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 is not installed. + Package libhdf5-1.8.4 is not installed. + Package libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 which provides libhdf5-1.8.4 is not installed. dpkg: error processing libnetcdf6 (--install): - dependency problems - leaving unconfigured + dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: - libatlas3-base_3.8.4-9ubuntu1_amd64.deb - libatlas3gf-base - libnetcdf6 + libatlas3-base_3.8.4-9ubuntu1_amd64.deb + libatlas3gf-base + libnetcdf6 Can you please fix the dependencies in package "libnetcdf6 [Raring]" ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169597 Title: Wrong dependencies for Raring13.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netcdf/+bug/1169597/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169597] Re: Wrong dependencies for Raring13.04
** Description changed: from http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/libnetcdf6 one of the dependence of libnetcdf6 [Raring] : "libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 Hierarchical Data Format 5 (HDF5) - runtime files - serial version or libhdf5-1.8.4 virtual package provided by libhdf5-lam-1.8.4, libhdf5-mpich-1.8.4, libhdf5-openmpi-1.8.4, libhdf5-serial-1.8.4" However the dependencies / conflicts of package libhdf5-7 [Raring] from the package itself is : "Conflicts: libhdf5-1.8, libhdf5-1.8.4, libhdf5-1.8.6, libhdf5-1.8.7, libhdf5-7, libhdf5-serial-1.8.4, libhdf5-serial-1.8.6, libhdf5-serial-1.8.7 Replaces: libhdf5-1.8.4, libhdf5-1.8.6, libhdf5-1.8.7, libhdf5-serial-1.8.4, libhdf5-serial-1.8.6, libhdf5-serial-1.8.7 Provides: libhdf5-1.8, libhdf5-7" I encountered this when trying to upgrade to package libnetcdf6 from Raring. Previously I had to install pckage libhdf5-7 [Raring], however since it conflicts and replaces libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 I had to remove it. However it appears that package libnetcdf6 [Raring] IS NOT AWARE that libhdf5-7 replaces libhdf5-1.8.4 and libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 Hence I am holding "broken packages". I was upgrading to the latest matplotlib in Precise to those of raring issuing the command : $ sudo dpkg -i python-matplotlib_1.2.0-1_amd64.deb python-matplotlib- data_1.2.0-1_all.deb fonts-lyx_2.0.3-3_all.deb python- numpy_1.7.0-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb python-glade2_2.24.0-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb python-gtk2_2.24.0-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb python-pygame_1.9.1release+dfsg- 8_amd64.deb libblas3_1.2.20110419-5_amd64.deb liblapack3_3.4.2-1~exp3_amd64.deb octave_3.6.4-1_amd64.deb libatlas3gf- base_3.8.4-9ubuntu1_all.deb libfftw3-double3_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb libfftw3-single3_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb libblas3gf_1.2.20110419-5_all.deb liblapack3gf_3.4.2-1~exp3_all.deb libfftw3-3_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb liboctave1_3.6.4-1_amd64.deb octave- common_3.6.4-1_all.deb libgl2ps0_1.3.6-1_amd64.deb libhdf5-7_1.8.9-1~exp3_amd64.deb libnetcdf6_4.1.1-6_amd64.deb libatlas3-base_3.8.4-9ubuntu1_amd64.deb + libfftw3-dev_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb + libfftw3-bin_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb + libfftw3-long3_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb + libfftw3-quad3_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libnetcdf6: libnetcdf6 depends on libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 | libhdf5-1.8.4; however: Package libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 is not installed. Package libhdf5-1.8.4 is not installed. Package libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 which provides libhdf5-1.8.4 is not installed. dpkg: error processing libnetcdf6 (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: - libatlas3-base_3.8.4-9ubuntu1_amd64.deb - libatlas3gf-base libnetcdf6 Can you please fix the dependencies in package "libnetcdf6 [Raring]" ? ** Description changed: from http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/libnetcdf6 one of the dependence of libnetcdf6 [Raring] : "libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 Hierarchical Data Format 5 (HDF5) - runtime files - serial version or libhdf5-1.8.4 virtual package provided by libhdf5-lam-1.8.4, libhdf5-mpich-1.8.4, libhdf5-openmpi-1.8.4, libhdf5-serial-1.8.4" However the dependencies / conflicts of package libhdf5-7 [Raring] from the package itself is : "Conflicts: libhdf5-1.8, libhdf5-1.8.4, libhdf5-1.8.6, libhdf5-1.8.7, libhdf5-7, libhdf5-serial-1.8.4, libhdf5-serial-1.8.6, libhdf5-serial-1.8.7 Replaces: libhdf5-1.8.4, libhdf5-1.8.6, libhdf5-1.8.7, libhdf5-serial-1.8.4, libhdf5-serial-1.8.6, libhdf5-serial-1.8.7 Provides: libhdf5-1.8, libhdf5-7" I encountered this when trying to upgrade to package libnetcdf6 from Raring. Previously I had to install pckage libhdf5-7 [Raring], however since it conflicts and replaces libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 I had to remove it. However it appears that package libnetcdf6 [Raring] IS NOT AWARE that libhdf5-7 replaces libhdf5-1.8.4 and libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 Hence I am holding "broken packages". I was upgrading to the latest matplotlib in Precise to those of raring issuing the command : $ sudo dpkg -i python-matplotlib_1.2.0-1_amd64.deb python-matplotlib- data_1.2.0-1_all.deb fonts-lyx_2.0.3-3_all.deb python- numpy_1.7.0-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb python-glade2_2.24.0-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb python-gtk2_2.24.0-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb python-pygame_1.9.1release+dfsg- 8_amd64.deb libblas3_1.2.20110419-5_amd64.deb liblapack3_3.4.2-1~exp3_amd64.deb octave_3.6.4-1_amd64.deb libatlas3gf- base_3.8.4-9ubuntu1_all.deb libfftw3-double3_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb libfftw3-single3_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb libblas3gf_1.2.20110419-5_all.deb liblapack3gf_3.4.2-1~exp3_all.deb libfftw3-3_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb liboctave1_3.6.4-1_amd64.deb octave- common_3.6.4-1_all.deb libgl2ps0_1.3.6-1_amd64.deb libhdf5-7_1.8.9-1~exp3_amd64.deb libnetcdf6_4.1.1-6_amd64.deb libatlas3-base_3.8.4-9ubuntu1_amd64.deb libfftw3-dev
[Bug 1169597] Re: Wrong dependencies for Raring13.04
** Description changed: from http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/libnetcdf6 one of the dependence of libnetcdf6 [Raring] : "libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 Hierarchical Data Format 5 (HDF5) - runtime files - serial version or libhdf5-1.8.4 virtual package provided by libhdf5-lam-1.8.4, libhdf5-mpich-1.8.4, libhdf5-openmpi-1.8.4, libhdf5-serial-1.8.4" However the dependencies / conflicts of package libhdf5-7 [Raring] from the package itself is : "Conflicts: libhdf5-1.8, libhdf5-1.8.4, libhdf5-1.8.6, libhdf5-1.8.7, libhdf5-7, libhdf5-serial-1.8.4, libhdf5-serial-1.8.6, libhdf5-serial-1.8.7 Replaces: libhdf5-1.8.4, libhdf5-1.8.6, libhdf5-1.8.7, libhdf5-serial-1.8.4, libhdf5-serial-1.8.6, libhdf5-serial-1.8.7 Provides: libhdf5-1.8, libhdf5-7" I encountered this when trying to upgrade to package libnetcdf6 from Raring. Previously I had to install pckage libhdf5-7 [Raring], however since it conflicts and replaces libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 I had to remove it. However it appears that package libnetcdf6 [Raring] IS NOT AWARE that libhdf5-7 replaces libhdf5-1.8.4 and libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 Hence I am holding "broken packages". I was upgrading to the latest matplotlib in Precise to those of raring issuing the command : $ sudo dpkg -i python-matplotlib_1.2.0-1_amd64.deb python-matplotlib- data_1.2.0-1_all.deb fonts-lyx_2.0.3-3_all.deb python- numpy_1.7.0-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb python-glade2_2.24.0-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb python-gtk2_2.24.0-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb python-pygame_1.9.1release+dfsg- 8_amd64.deb libblas3_1.2.20110419-5_amd64.deb liblapack3_3.4.2-1~exp3_amd64.deb octave_3.6.4-1_amd64.deb libatlas3gf- base_3.8.4-9ubuntu1_all.deb libfftw3-double3_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb libfftw3-single3_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb libblas3gf_1.2.20110419-5_all.deb liblapack3gf_3.4.2-1~exp3_all.deb libfftw3-3_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb liboctave1_3.6.4-1_amd64.deb octave- common_3.6.4-1_all.deb libgl2ps0_1.3.6-1_amd64.deb libhdf5-7_1.8.9-1~exp3_amd64.deb libnetcdf6_4.1.1-6_amd64.deb libatlas3-base_3.8.4-9ubuntu1_amd64.deb libfftw3-dev_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb libfftw3-bin_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb libfftw3-long3_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb libfftw3-quad3_3.3.3-2ubuntu1_amd64.deb dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libnetcdf6: libnetcdf6 depends on libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 | libhdf5-1.8.4; however: Package libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 is not installed. Package libhdf5-1.8.4 is not installed. Package libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 which provides libhdf5-1.8.4 is not installed. dpkg: error processing libnetcdf6 (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: libnetcdf6 - Earlier I had to force depends to install libhdf5-7 : + Earlier I had to --force-depends to install libhdf5-7 : $ sudo dpkg -i --force-depends libhdf5-7_1.8.9-1~exp3_amd64.deb dpkg: considering removing libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 in favour of libhdf5-7 ... dpkg: warning: ignoring dependency problem with removal of libhdf5-serial-1.8.4: - libnetcdf6 depends on libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 | libhdf5-1.8.4 - libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 is to be removed. - libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 provides libhdf5-1.8.4 but is to be removed. + libnetcdf6 depends on libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 | libhdf5-1.8.4 + libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 is to be removed. + libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 provides libhdf5-1.8.4 but is to be removed. dpkg: warning: ignoring dependency problem with removal of libhdf5-serial-1.8.4: - libgdal1-1.7.0 depends on libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 | libhdf5-1.8.4 - libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 is to be removed. - libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 provides libhdf5-1.8.4 but is to be removed. + libgdal1-1.7.0 depends on libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 | libhdf5-1.8.4 + libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 is to be removed. + libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 provides libhdf5-1.8.4 but is to be removed. dpkg: may have trouble removing libhdf5-serial-1.8.4, as it provides libhdf5-1.8.4 ... dpkg: warning: ignoring dependency problem with removal of libhdf5-serial-1.8.4: - libnetcdf6 depends on libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 | libhdf5-1.8.4 - libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 is to be removed. - libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 provides libhdf5-1.8.4 but is to be removed. + libnetcdf6 depends on libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 | libhdf5-1.8.4 + libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 is to be removed. + libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 provides libhdf5-1.8.4 but is to be removed. dpkg: may have trouble removing libhdf5-serial-1.8.4, as it provides libhdf5-1.8.4 ... dpkg: warning: ignoring dependency problem with removal of libhdf5-serial-1.8.4: - libgdal1-1.7.0 depends on libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 | libhdf5-1.8.4 - libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 is to be removed. - libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 provides libhdf5-1.8.4 but is to be removed. + libgdal1-1.7.0 depends on libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 | libhdf5-1.8.4 + libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 is to be removed. + libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 provides libhdf5-1.8.4 but is to be removed. dpkg: yes, will remove libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 in fav
[Bug 1159288] Re: GParted hang while Scanning all devices for 10 to 15 mn
Thank you for your feedback. I was able to reproduce the bug today. It is not linked to any floppy device at all since I have used the same hardware for one year and that was working properly. In fact this bug is appearing right during and after the installation of VMware Workstation 9.0.2 for Linux x64. I can see that : sudo blkid takes now in the 10 to 15 mn to complete vs. less than a second. This has the same effect on gparted. If I happen to close gparted while "Scanning for all devices" then a subsequent launch will have it to crash right after getting the system password. I need to restart Ubuntu to attempt a relaunch of gparted. Unfortunately removing VMware Workstation does not solve the issue. They obviously tinker something in the Ubuntu file system to make this happen to 'blkid' and 'gparted'. This may be as well because of a weakness in the code of linux Ubuntu which is affected by something from the VMware installation process. I am trying to find a way to report this bug to VMware ... Since I happen to have a working image of Ubuntu 12.04 made a month ago with CloneZilla I was able to pinpoint the problem. However it is quite unerving that a "commercial" program could derails basic functions of the OS and impact through it other applications. If you have any other thought, please let me know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159288 Title: GParted hang while Scanning all devices for 10 to 15 mn To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/1159288/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1159288] Re: GParted hang while Scanning all devices for 10 to 15 mn
I can confirm today that it's not directly linked to VMware Workstation ... However I had an image restored from before this bug appeared and I was just free of this bug until a few days ago when I installed QEMU and today KVM. I suspect that QEMU did bring back the issue ... I know that Oracle VirtualBox uses parts of QEMU, I don't know yet for VMware. I am in contact with VMware about this issue and as of last week they were ot able to reproduce this bug. I have an old graphic card ATI Radeon 3870 and an ASUS Motherboard P5Q3 Deluxe WiFi. I have a new nVidia card GTI 660 Ti which I will install my be next week. Can other people affected by this bug post their hardware configuration ? Can you please elaborate on the "blacklist fd0" ? Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159288 Title: GParted hang while Scanning all devices for 10 to 15 mn To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/1159288/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1159288] Re: GParted hang while Scanning all devices for 10 to 15 mn
OK. No need to strace. I did the same trick as john Buczek. My system is working now. I did have a floppy appearing in fact on the left column of Nautilus. The following Command Lines made it disappear instantly. I went to unix.stackexchange.com to get a solution : "Linux, disable /dev/fd0 (floppy)" http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/53513/linux-disable-dev-fd0-floppy Namely : $ echo "blacklist floppy" | sudo tee /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-floppy.conf $ sudo rmmod floppy $ sudo update-initramfs -u The result is immediate, no need to reboot and lasting. May be I will have to do it again at the next kernel update ? The trouble came from the fact that although I have no floppy disk on my hardware system, the ASUS BIOS is declaring it. Hence the trouble with Linux. At least on Ubuntu the thing to do is to blacklist the module associated with /dev/fd0 I have re-install VMware in addition to QEMU-KVM and everything is working fine, gparted and the CL sudo blkid as well. This is closing this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159288 Title: GParted hang while Scanning all devices for 10 to 15 mn To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/1159288/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 45026] Re: K3b dont find emovix-2 and normalize
Bug still there in Ubuntu 12.04 Precise. Almost 5 years and counting ... Thanks to Vanessa and Torsten for the fix. It worked like a charm. A shame that nobody could take care of this one ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45026 Title: K3b dont find emovix-2 and normalize To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/k3b/+bug/45026/+subscriptions -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1191195] Re: Cannot launch banshee: Unhandled Exception: System.DllNotFoundException: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
The previously reported bug marked later as Invalid was : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/717850 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191195 Title: Cannot launch banshee: Unhandled Exception: System.DllNotFoundException: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/1191195/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1191195] [NEW] Cannot launch banshee: Unhandled Exception: System.DllNotFoundException: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
Public bug reported: I have the exact same problem as another bug already reported bug which has been marked as invalid. I strongly disagree with the term Invalid. When attempting to launch any version [even superseded ones] of banshee [for Precise 12.04 amd64] from the Command Line I get: $ banshee [...] [ERROR] FATAL UNHANDLED EXCEPTION: System.DllNotFoundException: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 [...] [ERROR] FATAL UNHANDLED EXCEPTION: System.DllNotFoundException: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 The reported missing library libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 is part of package libgtk2.0-0 (I have as well libgtk2.0-0:i386 installed) and is located at the right place. i.e. $ locate libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.10 /usr/lib/vmware/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 /usr/lib/vmware/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 /usr/lib/vmware-installer/2.1.0/lib/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 /usr/lib/vmware-installer/2.1.0/lib/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.10 $ The logs from strace and MONO_LOG_LEVEL are similar the earlier reported bug $ strace -e trace=open banshee 2>&1 | grep libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0\" $ MONO_LOG_LEVEL=debug banshee What is amazing in the MONO_LOG_LEVEL is the reporting of fictuous libraries not found i.e. /usr/lib/mono/4.0/mscorlib.dll.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Well have the .dll file (which is a Windows library extension type). I have never seen before a .dll.so (mixture of Windows and Linux library ?). Anyway I did have OpenGL installed and as well mesa (libgl1-mesa* packages). My Ubuntu 12.04 is properly functioning and obviously I have a lot of application installed. Of all the sound player installed only Banshee is unable to launch ... There is obviouly something wrong with this application. I am ready to provide further information upon request. In the mean time I will remove this application to avoid being annoyed by non functional updates from Ubuntu Updates required now a partial upgrade ... ** Affects: banshee (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "Banshee 2.4.1-3ubuntu1~precise2 Fatal Error.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191195/+attachment/3703829/+files/Banshee%202.4.1-3ubuntu1%7Eprecise2%20Fatal%20Error.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191195 Title: Cannot launch banshee: Unhandled Exception: System.DllNotFoundException: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/1191195/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1191195] Re: Cannot launch banshee: Unhandled Exception: System.DllNotFoundException: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
Thank you for your quick answer. Yes I did not attach the MONO_LOG_LEVEL log, here it is. Well the Ubuntu Updates for Partial upgrade was not related to Banshee but to a wine 1.6 rc1 and today rc2 which sports 2 same binaries (executable files in /usr/bin/) in 2 different packages ... coming someone at ubuntu.com in L.A. ... ** Attachment added: "MONO_LOG_LEVEL.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/1191195/+attachment/3704203/+files/MONO_LOG_LEVEL.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191195 Title: Cannot launch banshee: Unhandled Exception: System.DllNotFoundException: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/1191195/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1191195] Re: Cannot launch banshee: Unhandled Exception: System.DllNotFoundException: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
This is the result libked libraries in libcairo2 $ ldd /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fffa47ff000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x7f2fb0515000) libpixman-1.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpixman-1.so.0 (0x7f2fb027e000) libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfontconfig.so.1 (0x7f2fb0043000) libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfreetype.so.6 (0x7f2fafd8a000) libpng12.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpng12.so.0 (0x7f2fafb62000) libxcb-shm.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-shm.so.0 (0x7f2faf95e000) libxcb-render.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-render.so.0 (0x7f2faf754000) libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb.so.1 (0x7f2faf536000) libXrender.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXrender.so.1 (0x7f2faf32b000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6 (0x7f2faeff6000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXext.so.6 (0x7f2faede5000) libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x7f2faebcd000) librt.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 (0x7f2fae9c5000) libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x7f2fae6c) libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x7f2fae2f7000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7f2fb0a7a000) libexpat.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexpat.so.1 (0x7f2fae0cd000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXau.so.6 (0x7f2fadec9000) libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x7f2fadcc3000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x7f2fadabf000) $ Well I have in principle the Ubuntu package for libpng12 installed at the right place. I didn't modify it. However, I installed he latest version libpng 1.62 whih I compiled. I have ImageMagick, wxWidgets and WxPython working with libpng1.62 Till now I didn't had any application not working with this set-up. I have a lot of Photo Video applications and the latest versions can compile with libpng1.62. However it looks like Ubuntu officials apps are locked in at libpng1.2 ... However I did try to compile libcairo ad i is still not working at all with libpng1.62 (I mean libpng >= 1.15). libpng.org on their website still have the remainder for making the code compatible. Portability Note -- The libpng 1.5.x and 1.6.x series continue the evolution of the libpng API, finally hiding the contents of the venerable and hoary png_struct and png_info data structures inside private (i.e., non-installed) header files. Instead of direct struct-access, applications should be using the various png_get_xxx() and png_set_xxx() accessor functions, which have existed for almost as long as libpng itself. If your application is fully dependent on libcairo that may explain the behaviour. Anyway I have left he libpng1.2 libraries at their original place. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191195 Title: Cannot launch banshee: Unhandled Exception: System.DllNotFoundException: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/1191195/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1191195] Re: Cannot launch banshee: Unhandled Exception: System.DllNotFoundException: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
Trouble is that these libraries have different names and are all present. It should be to the applications to decide whatever library they want to use and the system shoud not interfere in any way. Albeit it looks like there is some weird interferences for some applications. The new libpng libraries don't lack any functional things as I would say the 1.2 are old freezed version receiving only security updates. The matter is that png_struct and png_info data are no more in header files (for devel) and that the source code of applications has to be adapted to this reality using png_get_xxx() and png_set_xxx() accessor functions. Some applications developpers refused to do and locked down the libnpg shared library to the 1.12 version. Here is the result of $ sudo ldconfig -v > ldconfig-v.log attached. Both libpng libraries are visible in the log. Here is a summary of what I have done about libpng in my system. -- I have set the libpng16 in /usr/lib/ (this is the default from compiling the tarball) and made sym links to /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu Compiled package libpng16-0_1.6.2-0ubuntu0_amd64.deb -- Installed Files --- /usr/bin/libpng-config ---> symbolic link to libpng16-config /usr/bin/libpng16-config +/usr/include/libpng---> symbolic link to libpng16 /usr/include/libpng16 /usr/include/libpng16/png.h /usr/include/libpng16/pngconf.h /usr/include/libpng16/pnglibconf.h /usr/include/png.h ---> symbolic link to libpng16/png.h /usr/include/pngconf.h ---> symbolic link to libpng16/pngconf.h /usr/include/pnglibconf.h ---> symbolic link to libpng16/pnglibconf.h /usr/lib/libpng.a ---> symbolic link to libpng16.a /usr/lib/libpng.la /usr/lib/libpng.so ---> symbolic link to libpng16.so /usr/lib/libpng16.a /usr/lib/libpng16.la /usr/lib/libpng16.so---> symbolic link to libpng16.so.16.2.0 /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16 ---> symbolic link to libpng16.so.16.2.0 /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16.2.0 /usr/lib/pkgconfig /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libpng.pc---> symbolic link to libpng16.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libpng16.pc /usr/share/man/man3 /usr/share/man/man3/libpng.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/libpngpf.3.gz /usr/share/man/man5 /usr/share/man/man5/png.5.gz I did add a symbolic link named libpng12.so.0 ---> libpng.so $ cd /usr/lib/ $ sudo ln -s libpng.so libpng12.so.0 Package libpng12-0 (Official Ubuntu) libpng12-0 1.2.46-3ubuntu4 PNG library - runtime Installed Files --- /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpng12.so.0 ---> symbolic link to libpng12.so.0.46.0 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpng12.so.0.46.0 /usr/share/doc-base/libpng12 /usr/share/doc/libpng12-0 /usr/share/doc/libpng12-0/ANNOUNCE /usr/share/doc/libpng12-0/KNOWNBUG /usr/share/doc/libpng12-0/README.Debian /usr/share/doc/libpng12-0/README.gz /usr/share/doc/libpng12-0/TODO /usr/share/doc/libpng12-0/changelog.Debian.gz /usr/share/doc/libpng12-0/copyright /usr/share/doc/libpng12-0/libpng-1.2.46.txt.gz Pacakge libpng12-dev (Official Ubuntu) -- libpng12-dev1.2.46-3ubuntu4 PNG library - development Installed Files --- /usr/bin/libpng-config ---> symbolic link to libpng12-config /usr/bin/libpng12-config /usr/include/libpng ---> symbolic link to libpng12 /usr/include/libpng12 /usr/include/libpng12/png.h /usr/include/libpng12/pngconf.h /usr/include/png.h ---> symbolic link to libpng12/png.h /usr/include/pngconf.h ---> symbolic link to libpng12/pngconf.h /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpng.a ---> symbolic link to libpng12.a /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpng.so ---> symbolic link to libpng12.so /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpng12.a /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpng12.so ---> symbolic link to /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpng12.so.0 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/libpng.pc ---> symbolic link to libpng12.pc /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/libpng12.pc /usr/share/doc/libpng12-dev /usr/share/doc/libpng12-dev/changelog.Debian.gz ---> symbolic link to ../libpng12-0/changelog.Debian.gz /usr/share/doc/libpng12-dev/copyright /usr/share/doc/libpng12-dev/examples /usr/share/doc/libpng12-dev/examples/example.c.gz /usr/share/doc/libpng12-dev/examples/pngtest.c.gz /usr/share/doc/libpng12-dev/examples/pngtest.png /usr/share/man/man1 /usr/share/man/man1/libpng-config.1.gz ---> symbolic link to libpng12-config.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/libpng12-config.1.gz /usr/share/man/man3 /usr/share/man/man3/libpng.3.gz /usr/share/ma
[Bug 1191195] Re: Cannot launch banshee: Unhandled Exception: System.DllNotFoundException: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
Well after posting the explanation of what I have done about libpng12 and libpng16 and reading from Chow Loong Jin (hyperair) that his analysys of MONO points him to : Mono: DllImport error loading library: '/usr/lib/libpng12.so.0: version `PNG12_0' not found I tried to remove the symbolic link I did add manually : $ sudo rm /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 The program looks at the first instance of the library found (may be). So now it has to go at the right place to find it in /lib/x86_64-linux- gnu And it looks like now Banshee 2.4.1 is working fine :-). Then I just performed an Ubuntu Update (Gnome) since I am a subscriber of the ppa maintained by Chow Loong Jin (hyperair) and the last version 2.6.1 of Banshee is now working in my system. Thank you so much Mr. Chow Loong Jin (hyperair) for your time and insight. I will later try to compile and build a package on my system using the libpng16 libraries. Can you you please update the status of this bug to Fixed instead of Invalid ? Thanks. One day I hope Ubuntu will try to move on from libpng12 which is on old version receiving only security updates. One day thre will be no support at all for it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191195 Title: Cannot launch banshee: Unhandled Exception: System.DllNotFoundException: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/1191195/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1191195] Re: Cannot launch banshee: Unhandled Exception: System.DllNotFoundException: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
Eveything is working fine in my system and I don't consider it "broken". My point of view is that Ubuntu is sticking with its "system build" to antique version of libraries. I obviously don't know the full reason why? This should in part comes from some developper / packager whom chose to ignore the natural evolution of software which is part of the so called "Ubuntu system build". Eventually there will be no more security fixes for libpng12 from its deleloppers @ http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/libpng.html. Linux is a free OS is not owned by Utuntu or other distribution. When I have time I will look-up your information in order to build my own packages when needed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191195 Title: Cannot launch banshee: Unhandled Exception: System.DllNotFoundException: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/1191195/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 971710] Re: update-rc.d: warning: apcupsd runlevel arguments do not match LSB Default values
>From : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610429 and the reference : http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts/ "the problem its that rules [are] set to non default values due [to the] type of daemon... and LSB header says different ... must update LSB headers and change to: # Default-Start: 1 2 3 4 5 # Default-Stop: 0 6 this change[s] are a clear mistake of the packager." Sorting through this information, you have to modify the file /etc/init.d/apcupsd accordingly. e.g. Use gedit in super user mode: $ gksu gedit /etc/init.d/apcupsd You will see the current (problematic) LSBInit #!/bin/sh ### BEGIN INIT INFO # Provides: apcupsd # Required-Start: $remote_fs $syslog # Required-Stop:$remote_fs $syslog # Should-Start: $local_fs # Should-Stop: $local_fs # Default-Start:2 3 4 5 # Default-Stop: 0 1 6 # Short-Description:Starts apcupsd daemon # Description: apcupsd provides UPS power management for APC products. ### END INIT INFO To make this script LSB (Linux Standards Base)-compliant, change it to look like this #!/bin/sh ### BEGIN INIT INFO # Provides: apcupsd # Required-Start: $remote_fs $syslog # Required-Stop:$remote_fs $syslog # Should-Start: $local_fs # Should-Stop: $local_fs # Default-Start:1 2 3 4 5 # Default-Stop: 0 6 # Short-Description:Starts apcupsd daemon # Description: apcupsd provides UPS power management for APC products. ### END INIT INFO I managed to rebuild this package with dpkg-deb -b dir-name And there is no more warning while installing it : $ sudo dpkg -i apcupsd_3.14.10-2_amd64.deb (Reading database ... 1195394 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace apcupsd 3.14.10-2 (using apcupsd_3.14.10-2_amd64.deb) ... Please check your configuration ISCONFIGURED in /etc/default/apcupsd Unpacking replacement apcupsd ... Please check your configuration ISCONFIGURED in /etc/default/apcupsd Setting up apcupsd (3.14.10-2) ... Please check your configuration ISCONFIGURED in /etc/default/apcupsd Processing triggers for man-db ... Processing triggers for ureadahead ... $ Cheers :-) ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #610429 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610429 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971710 Title: update-rc.d: warning: apcupsd runlevel arguments do not match LSB Default values To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apcupsd/+bug/971710/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569249] Re: [needs-packaging] zint
So what ? I already made 4 packages with sources from my Precise 12.04
http://sourceforge.net/projects/zint/
The sources will need libpng12 however for those have installed libpn
1.5 and up
'libpng15/png.h' no longer includes 'zlib.h'. You must do it yourself.
In 'convert.c':
#include
#include
Then it's straight forward
Compile the sources
___
$ tar -zxf zint-2.4.3.tar.gz
$ cd zint-2.4.3
$ mkdir build
$ cd build/
$ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=/usr -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo ..
FIX:PATH=/usr -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo ..
-- The C compiler identification is GNU 4.6.3
-- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 4.6.3
-- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/cc
-- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/cc -- works
-- Detecting C compiler ABI info
-- Detecting C compiler ABI info - done
-- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/c++
-- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/c++ -- works
-- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info
-- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info - done
-- Performing Test CXX_COMPILER_FLAG_WALL
-- Performing Test CXX_COMPILER_FLAG_WALL - Success
-- Found ZLIB: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so (found version "1.2.3.4")
-- Found PNG: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpng.so (found version "1.6.2")
-- Looking for Q_WS_X11
-- Looking for Q_WS_X11 - found
-- Looking for Q_WS_WIN
-- Looking for Q_WS_WIN - not found
-- Looking for Q_WS_QWS
-- Looking for Q_WS_QWS - not found
-- Looking for Q_WS_MAC
-- Looking for Q_WS_MAC - not found
-- Found Qt4: /usr/bin/qmake (found version "4.8.1")
-- Configuring done
-- Generating done
-- Build files have been written to:
/home/ubuntu-precise/user/Downloads/Barcode Software/Zint Barcode
Generator/zint-2.4.3/build
$ make -j4
To make a simple debian packaging you can use first checkinstall as
$ sudo checkinstall --install=no
Then when asked about the information
This package will be built according to these values:
0 - Maintainer: [ root@User-PC ]
1 - Summary: [ a barcode encoding library supporting over 50 symbologies ]
2 - Name:[ zint ]
3 - Version: [ 2.4.3 ]
4 - Release: [ 0ubuntu0~precise ]
5 - License: [ GPL ]
6 - Group: [ checkinstall ]
7 - Architecture: [ amd64 ]
8 - Source location: [ build ]
9 - Alternate source location: [ ]
10 - Requires: [ ]
11 - Provides: [ build ]
12 - Conflicts: [ ]
13 - Replaces: [ ]
In the end
$ sudo chown user:user zint_2.4.3-0ubuntu0~precise_amd64.deb
$ sudo chmod 664 zint_2.4.3-0ubuntu0~precise_amd64.deb
You can then install it as one package
$ sudo dpkg -i zint_2.4.3-0ubuntu0~precise_amd64.deb
Or as I did split it up in 4 separates packages
zint
zint-dev
zintqt
zintqt-dev
using dpkg -b package-name-folder
For this rename the package to orig.deb
$ mv zint_2.4.3-0ubuntu0~precise_amd64.deb
zint_2.4.3-0ubuntu0~precise_amd64.orig.deb
Extract its data content (it will be extracted in a new usr folder)
[seen in http://en.chys.info/2010/02/extract-deb-files/]
$ mkdir zint_2.4.3-0ubuntu0~precise_amd64.orig
$ mkdir zint_2.4.3-0ubuntu0~precise_amd64.orig/DEBIAN
$ cd zint_2.4.3-0ubuntu0~precise_amd64.orig
$ ar -p ../zint_2.4.3-0ubuntu0~precise_amd64.orig.deb ../data.tar.gz | tar -zxf
-
$ cd DEBIAN
$ ar -p ../../zint_2.4.3-0ubuntu0~precise_amd64.orig.deb ../../control.tar.gz |
tar -zxf -
$ cd ../..
Edit the control file from the extracted sources
zint-2.4.3/debian/control to make 4 packages
For example
$ cd zint-2.4.2/build
$ mkdir zint_2.4.2-0ubuntu0~precise_amd64
$ mkdir zint_2.4.2-0ubuntu0~precise_amd64/DEBIAN
$ mkdir zint_2.4.2-0ubuntu0~precise_amd64/usr
$ mkdir zint_2.4.2-0ubuntu0~precise_amd64/usr/bin
$ mkdir zint_2.4.2-0ubuntu0~precise_amd64/usr/lib
$ mkdir zint_2.4.2-0ubuntu0~precise_amd64/usr/share
Copy the control file in the DEBIAN folder.
Then compute the md5sums file
$ cd zint_2.4.2-0ubuntu0~precise_amd64
$ find ./usr -type f -exec md5sum {} \;>>md5sums.md5
$ mv md5sums.md5 DEBIAN/md5sums
$ cd ..
$ dpkg-deb -b zint_2.4.2-0ubuntu0~precise_amd64
$ sudo chmod 664 zint_2.4.2-0ubuntu0~precise_amd64.deb
the same for the 3 other packages ... Anyone as has a quicker fix to
build these packages ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569249
Title:
[needs-packaging] zint
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/569249/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569249] Re: [needs-packaging] zint
I forgot in the split-up a libzint package as well ... I didn't made a dbg package. This would require to compile the source with the debug option and package the /usr/bin and /usr/lib in it (in /usr/lib/debug). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569249 Title: [needs-packaging] zint To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/569249/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569249] Re: [needs-packaging] zint
well in addition there will be the package libqzint. That would make up to 6 packages without the debug. zint zint-dev zintqt zintqt-dev libzint libqzint -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569249 Title: [needs-packaging] zint To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/569249/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569249] Re: [needs-packaging] zint
For 64 bit Ubuntu the directories are : /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569249 Title: [needs-packaging] zint To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/569249/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1205898] [NEW] Network printing fails in 12.04 on KONICA MINOLTA mc1650 PPD
Public bug reported: I did add a KONICA MINOLTA mc1650 laser printer through System Settings... I then used the PPD file from the install DVD. I did configure the printer IP address to be 192.168.1.51 then I checked through a ping that the printer was accessible. However when trying to print the test page I get a Printer State : "Processing - Connecting to printer". Later on the message change to "Processing - The printer is not responding." And in the Document Print Status I get a Status : "Processing - Not connected?" And there is no way to get any document printed ... cups version 1.5.3-0ubuntu8 The Printer Properties Settings are as follow Printer Properties - 'KONICA MINOLTA mc1650 PPD' on localhost Description : KONICA MINOLTA mc1650 PPD Location : KMBTCFA56E Device URI : lpd://KMBTCFA56E/print KONICA MINOLTA mc1650 PPD Processing - The printer is not responding. Test and Maintenance [Print Test Page] [Print Self-Test Page] [Clean Print Heads] Thank you for any advice ... ** Affects: cups (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205898 Title: Network printing fails in 12.04 on KONICA MINOLTA mc1650 PPD To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1205898/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
