[Bug 510981] Re: Fix for Vmware Workstation 7 compile on Lucid Lynx 2.6.32
For me the solution perfectly works, thank you! (64-bit lucid, upgrade from karmic(with vmware workstation 7.0.0 build-203739), 2.6.32-22-generic, gcc 4.4.3) -- Fix for Vmware Workstation 7 compile on Lucid Lynx 2.6.32 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510981 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194271]
closing abandoned -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194271 Title: 'acdsee pro 2' doesn't start with wine To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/wine/+bug/194271/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1693920]
closing abandoned -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693920 Title: Cumulus software not install in ubuntu-gnome To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/wine/+bug/1693920/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1777708] Re: Desktop briefly becomes unresponsive when typing on 2 keyboards at the same time
Same issue here with R-Go split Interestingly I found one configuration that works, but horribly breaks other things: first, have a look with xinput $ xinput ⎡ Virtual core pointer id=2[master pointer (3)] ⎜ ↳ Virtual core XTEST pointerid=4[slave pointer (2)] ... ⎜ ↳ Hantick USB Keyboard Consumer Control id=20 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ HID 0911:2188 Consumer Controlid=22 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ HID 0911:2188 Mouse id=24 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ Hantick USB Keyboard Mouseid=25 [slave pointer (2)] ⎣ Virtual core keyboard id=3[master keyboard (2)] ↳ Virtual core XTEST keyboard id=5[slave keyboard (3)] ... ↳ Hantick USB Keyboard id=16 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ HID 0911:2188 System Control id=17 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ HID 0911:2188 id=18 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Hantick USB Keyboard System Control id=19 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Hantick USB Keyboard Consumer Control id=21 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ HID 0911:2188 Consumer Controlid=23 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Hantick USB Keyboard Wireless Radio Control id=26 [slave keyboard (3)] The Hantick devices as well as the 0911:2188 devices are the R-Go Split (why so many?) interestingly there is a wireless radio control??? Anyway, let's create a new group $ xinput create-master rgosplit 0 $ xinput ⎡ Virtual core pointer id=2[master pointer (3)] ... ⎡ rgosplit pointer id=27 [master pointer (28)] ⎜ ↳ rgosplit XTEST pointerid=29 [slave pointer (27)] ⎣ rgosplit keyboard id=28 [master keyboard (27)] ↳ rgosplit XTEST keyboard id=30 [slave keyboard (28)] and now add those 0911:2188 keyboard devices to it (note that you need to replace the numbers in the commands) $ xinput reattach 17 28 $ xinput reattach 18 28 $ xinput reattach 23 28 $ xinput ⎡ Virtual core pointer id=2[master pointer (3)] ⎜ ↳ Virtual core XTEST pointerid=4[slave pointer (2)] ... ⎜ ↳ Hantick USB Keyboard Consumer Control id=20 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ HID 0911:2188 Consumer Controlid=22 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ HID 0911:2188 Mouse id=24 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ Hantick USB Keyboard Mouseid=25 [slave pointer (2)] ⎣ Virtual core keyboard id=3[master keyboard (2)] ↳ Virtual core XTEST keyboard id=5[slave keyboard (3)] ... ↳ Hantick USB Keyboard id=16 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Hantick USB Keyboard System Control id=19 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Hantick USB Keyboard Consumer Control id=21 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Hantick USB Keyboard Wireless Radio Control id=26 [slave keyboard (3)] ⎡ rgosplit pointer id=27 [master pointer (28)] ⎜ ↳ rgosplit XTEST pointerid=29 [slave pointer (27)] ⎣ rgosplit keyboard id=28 [master keyboard (27)] ↳ HID 0911:2188 System Control id=17 [slave keyboard (28)] ↳ HID 0911:2188 id=18 [slave keyboard (28)] ↳ HID 0911:2188 Consumer Controlid=23 [slave keyboard (28)] ↳ rgosplit XTEST keyboard id=30 [slave keyboard (28)] Now I can type with both keyboard halfs simultaneously in a gnome-terminal! But when I switch to other applications, e.g. firefox, only one half can type... Maybe someone can build up on this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108 Title: Desktop briefly becomes unresponsive when typing on 2 keyboards at the same time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/108/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1750155]
closing dup -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1750155 Title: App cannot be run "with full administrator rights" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/playonlinux/+bug/1750155/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 357456]
*** Bug 25571 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357456 Title: Wine 1.1.20 crashes while installing Photoshop CS4 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697004] Re: mmap fails for higher addresses
Why should it behave different on Panda? I can't see the reason why mmap shouldn't give me that virtual address if don't use it already. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697004 Title: mmap fails for higher addresses -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697004] Re: mmap for fixed address fails for higher addresses
The virtual memory should depend on physical memory in size, not in position. That's why it's called mapping. And i already had success with mapping 64k at address greater than 0x7000 on machines with only 256MB Ram and 512MB swap... So something else must be wrong. A wild guess from me: I'm not sure if i gathered the information right, but it seems at least to me that the failing addresses are higher than the stack, so maybe there is a wrong assumption about stack growing direction in the mmap code that checks if the virtual address requested hits the stack area? (On ARM the stack is descending) ** Changed in: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697004 Title: mmap for fixed address fails for higher addresses -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697004] Re: mmap for fixed address fails for higher addresses
Hi Bryan, Thanks for doing more tests. My opinion stays the same: ARM behaviour is wrong :) I didn't had that issue for example with an older kernel in qemu-system-arm, but i guess being a VM it has no value for regression testing. And yes, there are Apps depending on the x86 mmap behaviour... I of course release the testcase into Public Domain or whatever license you want, but i have no idea to which mail to send and i have also no time to track the response, so if someone could do that would be very nice. PS: thx Bryan for digging into that code! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697004 Title: mmap for fixed address fails for higher addresses -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697004] Re: mmap for fixed address fails for higher addresses
I guess the testcase is fine. the older kernel was 2.6.28-versatile though we can't really say if it's a regression, but we will see -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697004 Title: mmap for fixed address fails for higher addresses -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 476079]
I mostly run wine with an offline network printer (connected to another ubuntu machine via usb, shared via network, both computer and printer are turned off) and it works fine. What i notice is that (on a different machine) wine starts very slowly when network shares mounted with CIFS are not reachable, but that's also true for other applications... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476079 Title: Can not launch Wine, after created a HP printer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/wine/+bug/476079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1054590]
(In reply to comment #34) > I see the patch has been processed. I assume that the future release of Wine > 1.5.16 should have the fix in it...yes? What does tell you the patch has been processed? dlls/wininet/netconnection.c wasn't changed since June -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054590 Title: Evernote client can not connect evernote.com server To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/wine/+bug/1054590/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 111061]
Scott: As of your launchpad bug url there won't ever be hints for us in the system themes, right? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111061 Title: Wine uses Windows colors instead of Ubuntu colors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/wine/+bug/111061/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1054590]
committed: http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/commitdiff/923ac2e546e5f86afd319d944a0a249bc1fa1e4a -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054590 Title: Evernote client can not connect evernote.com server To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/wine/+bug/1054590/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 655766] Re: "Programs" menu item appear twice in French
Also affects German, might be a packaging problem -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655766 Title: "Programs" menu item appear twice in French To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine/+bug/655766/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697004] Re: mmap for fixed address fails for higher addresses
I now installed angstrom on my pandaboard and the bug does not occur. angstrom kernel: 2.6.35.3 from http://narcissus.angstrom-distribution.org/ So the bug is at least not hardware related, but ubuntu specific. it's up to you to think about if it's more valid now -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697004 Title: mmap for fixed address fails for higher addresses -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697004] Re: mmap fails for higher addresses
** Attachment added: "testcase" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697004/+attachment/1782899/+files/main.c -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697004 Title: mmap fails for higher addresses -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697004] [NEW] mmap fails for higher addresses
Public bug reported: Seen on Ubuntu 10.10: 2.6.35-903.19 HW: Pandaboard Rev. EA1 In short: My attached testcase produces no output on my Desktop, but prints out very much on my Pandaboard (at runtime). It hits the (ret!=j) case from 0x7f00 and up i would expect to get virtual memory for my process if i want exactly a fix address, so it is on x86 and x86-64, but on Pandaboard mmap returns a different address. ** Affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: armel -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697004 Title: mmap fails for higher addresses -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 543343] Re: network-manager misspells the ESSID for wireless networks
** Summary changed: - network-manager misspells the ESSID for ad-hoc networks + network-manager misspells the ESSID for wireless networks -- network-manager misspells the ESSID for wireless networks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543343 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 543343] Re: ath5k driver misspells the ESSID for ad-hoc networks
This Bug affects me too. I first used the Fritz!Usb stick with NDISwrapper and thought it broke with my update to lucid. The i bought a Netgear WG111v3 and it still didnt work. I was frustrated and used a very long ethernet cable across my living room for some weeks now. i thank Stefan for his workaround. This Bug is really annoying and should not be present in a LTS Version! ** Summary changed: - ath5k driver misspells the ESSID for ad-hoc networks + network-manager misspells the ESSID for ad-hoc networks -- network-manager misspells the ESSID for ad-hoc networks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543343 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
