[Bug 436190] Re: firefox gives "Couldn't load XPCOM." and does not start

2010-05-31 Thread Alexx Roche
#I found a fix: 
$ sudo aptitude remove xulrunner-1.9.1

# Then I said "n" (no) to the first three proposed solutions from
aptitude, (no idea if they would have worked) and eventually was
presented with

Downgrade the following packages:
xulrunner-1.9.1 [1.9.1.9+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.10.1 (karmic-updates,
karmic-security, now) -> 1.9.1.3+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu6 (karmic)]

Score is -9772

Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] y
The following packages will be DOWNGRADED:
  xulrunner-1.9.1 
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  firefox-3.5-gnome-support{a} firefox-gnome-support{a} 
  xulrunner-1.9.1-gnome-support{a} 
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 downgraded, 3 to remove and 0 not 
upgraded.
Need to get 7,986kB of archives. After unpacking 524kB will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] y

and now firefox-3.5 (.9) works again. (Still, this isn't good news for
Ubuntu or normal users. I still have no idea which update put my install
in this position, or if it was something that I did.)

-- 
firefox gives "Couldn't load XPCOM." and does not start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436190
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 436190] Re: firefox gives "Couldn't load XPCOM." and does not start

2010-05-27 Thread Alexx Roche
me too:
# cat /etc/issue
Ubuntu 9.10 \n \l
$ firefox %u -safe-mode
Couldn't load XPCOM.
$ firefox-3.5 %u -safe-mode
Couldn't load XPCOM.
# apt-get update && apt-get upgrade -y


Setting up xserver-xorg-core (2:1.6.4-2ubuntu4.3) ...

Processing triggers for libc-bin ...
ldconfig deferred processing now taking place
Processing triggers for python-support ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
 xulrunner-1.9.1
 xulrunner-1.9.1-gnome-support
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

$ uname -a
uname -a
Linux laptop 2.6.31-20-generic #58-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 12 05:23:09 UTC 2010 i686 
GNU/Linux

Chrome still works.. for now.

-- 
firefox gives "Couldn't load XPCOM." and does not start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436190
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951673] Re: CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

2012-04-26 Thread Alexx Roche
I really am starting to wonder if something has broken in my hardware, (am I 
the only one with this problem?) I thought that my CPU fan might be having 
problems but graphing that using ipmi and munin shows that the CPU seems ok, 
(though obviously the reporting could be bogus - that said just feeling the 
laptop and listening to it, it just feels the same as it has all these years.
  I guess the next step is to install a nice stripped down version of Slackware 
and see if it is a debian 'thing'.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951673

Title:
  CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/951673/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951673] Re: CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

2012-04-26 Thread Alexx Roche
2.6.32-41 installed and still not fixed. I've tried all of the kernels
that I have, ( 2.6.31-14 2.6.31-20 2.6.31-21 2.6.31-22 2.6.31-23
2.6.32-38 2.6.32-39 2.6.32-40 2.6.32-41) and still get, (seemingly)
random jumps down from 1.2 to 800 even though it is still set to
performance. Sometimes they start at 800 and won't scale at all. I've
checked again that it is still enabled in the BIOS, (which it is).
2.6.31-14 still /seems/ to be the most reliable, but even with that
running both CPUs at 1.2 GHz youtube still seems to have problems with
video, (guess I'll have to do more working and less "research" ;-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951673

Title:
  CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/951673/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951673] Re: CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

2012-04-04 Thread Alexx Roche
with 2.6.32-40-generic #87-Ubuntu SMP I can change /etc/init.d/ondemand
to performance and then I get the full CPU, (though it does not scale.)
I have not tried compiling my own kernel to see if this is a
debian/ubuntu issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951673

Title:
  CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/951673/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951673] Re: CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

2012-03-15 Thread Alexx Roche
I would be delighted to try the upstream kernel as I have finished
testing 2.6.32-38 (with the following result):

uname -r
2.6.32-38-generic
grep -i fail  /var/log/boot/log
 * CPUFreq Utilities: Setting ondemand CPUFreq governor...   [fail] 
 * CPU1.

I have made no changes to the hardware, (or even the BIOS) and have checked 
that the temperature of the CPU is no higher than normal. Even when I find a 
kernel that does manage to boot with CPUFreq it is as if something is deciding 
to disable it after a few seconds or minutes, and I can see that cpufreq-info 
has changed to 
current policy: frequency should be within 800 MHz and 800 MHz.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951673

Title:
  CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/951673/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951673] Re: CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

2012-03-15 Thread Alexx Roche
hmm, not a great start to testing upstream. The well written document at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/MainlineBuilds?action=show&redirect=KernelMainlineBuilds#Installing_Mainline_Kernels
did not match the archive at 
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.3-rc7-precise/ 

When I guessed and downloaded 
linux-headers-3.3.0-030300rc7-generic_3.3.0-030300rc7.201203101735_i386.deb
rather than
linux-headers-3.3.0-030300rc7-generic-pae_3.3.0-030300rc7.201203101735_i386.deb 
I got (from the GUI installer)
Error: Dependency is not satisfiable: linux-headers-3.3.0-030300rc7
so I tried the command line and got:

dpkg -i *.deb
Selecting previously deselected package linux-headers-3.3.0-030300rc7-generic.
(Reading database ... 402277 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking linux-headers-3.3.0-030300rc7-generic (from 
linux-headers-3.3.0-030300rc7-generic_3.3.0-030300rc7.201203101735_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package linux-image-3.3.0-030300rc7-generic.
Unpacking linux-image-3.3.0-030300rc7-generic (from 
linux-image-3.3.0-030300rc7-generic_3.3.0-030300rc7.201203101735_i386.deb) ...
Done.

dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of 
linux-headers-3.3.0-030300rc7-generic:
 linux-headers-3.3.0-030300rc7-generic depends on 
linux-headers-3.3.0-030300rc7; however:
^ ? (Seems hard 
to resolve!)
  Package linux-headers-3.3.0-030300rc7 is not installed.
dpkg: error processing linux-headers-3.3.0-030300rc7-generic (--install):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Setting up linux-image-3.3.0-030300rc7-generic (3.3.0-030300rc7.201203101735) 
...
Running depmod.
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.3.0-030300rc7-generic

(but I now have Ubuntu, with Linux 3.3.0-030300rc7-generic in my grub so
I'm off to reboot)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951673

Title:
  CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/951673/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951673] Re: CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

2012-03-15 Thread Alexx Roche
No better:
3.3.0-030300rc7-generic
$ cpufreq-info 
cpufrequtils 006: cpufreq-info (C) Dominik Brodowski 2004-2009
Report errors and bugs to cpuf...@vger.kernel.org, please.
analyzing CPU 0:
  driver: acpi-cpufreq
  CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0 1
  CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 0
  maximum transition latency: 10.0 us.
  hardware limits: 800 MHz - 1.20 GHz
  available frequency steps: 1.20 GHz, 800 MHz
  available cpufreq governors: conservative, ondemand, userspace, powersave, 
performance
  current policy: frequency should be within 800 MHz and 800 MHz.
  The governor "performance" may decide which speed to use
  within this range.
  current CPU frequency is 800 MHz.
  cpufreq stats: 1.20 GHz:2.98%, 800 MHz:97.02%  (1)
analyzing CPU 1:
  driver: acpi-cpufreq
  CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0 1
  CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 1
  maximum transition latency: 10.0 us.
  hardware limits: 800 MHz - 1.20 GHz
  available frequency steps: 1.20 GHz, 800 MHz
  available cpufreq governors: conservative, ondemand, userspace, powersave, 
performance
  current policy: frequency should be within 800 MHz and 800 MHz.
  The governor "performance" may decide which speed to use
  within this range.
  current CPU frequency is 800 MHz.
  cpufreq stats: 1.20 GHz:2.98%, 800 MHz:97.02%  (1)
$ uptime
 11:30:36 up 2 min,  2 users,  load average: 5.77, 2.79, 1.08

# I'll try to fix the headers using synaptic or aptitude.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951673

Title:
  CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/951673/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951673] Re: CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

2012-03-15 Thread Alexx Roche
synaptic just wanted to remove the "broken" linux headers for the 3.3
kernel... so I let it and rebooted. Scaling still not working.

I've booted into another old kernel and for now it seems to be working, (though 
in this case working means "going at full power and never backing down" which 
is better for me than trying to run on half my CPU's cores.
(for ref:)

uptime; uname -r; cpufreq-info 
 11:54:03 up 6 min,  2 users,  load average: 5.50, 4.39, 2.10
2.6.31-23-generic
cpufrequtils 006: cpufreq-info (C) Dominik Brodowski 2004-2009
Report errors and bugs to cpuf...@vger.kernel.org, please.
analyzing CPU 0:
  driver: acpi-cpufreq
  CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0 1
  CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 0
  maximum transition latency: 10.0 us.
  hardware limits: 800 MHz - 1.20 GHz
  available frequency steps: 1.20 GHz, 800 MHz
  available cpufreq governors: conservative, ondemand, userspace, powersave, 
performance
  current policy: frequency should be within 800 MHz and 1.20 GHz.
  The governor "performance" may decide which speed to use
  within this range.
  current CPU frequency is 1.20 GHz (asserted by call to hardware).
  cpufreq stats: 1.20 GHz:100.00%, 800 MHz:0.00%  (1)
analyzing CPU 1:
  driver: acpi-cpufreq
  CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0 1
  CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 1
  maximum transition latency: 10.0 us.
  hardware limits: 800 MHz - 1.20 GHz
  available frequency steps: 1.20 GHz, 800 MHz
  available cpufreq governors: conservative, ondemand, userspace, powersave, 
performance
  current policy: frequency should be within 800 MHz and 1.20 GHz.
  The governor "performance" may decide which speed to use
  within this range.
  current CPU frequency is 1.20 GHz (asserted by call to hardware).
  cpufreq stats: 1.20 GHz:100.00%, 800 MHz:0.00%

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951673

Title:
  CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/951673/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951673] Re: CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

2012-03-15 Thread Alexx Roche
I would update the tag, but I don't seem to have rights to edit them,
(no pencil icon for me).

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951673

Title:
  CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/951673/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951673] Re: CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

2012-03-15 Thread Alexx Roche
not sure if this is relevant. I tried to set the governor by hand using

root@laptop:~# cpufreq-selector -g ondemand

the CPU dipped down to half and cpufreq-info reported "ondemand" for
about a second before the CPU was set back to performance.

uname -r
2.6.31-23-generic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951673

Title:
  CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/951673/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951673] Re: CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

2012-03-15 Thread Alexx Roche
Firefox has been crashing on me since this update. (I found
http://askubuntu.com/questions/100730/how-to-upgrade-to-glx-1-3-on-
ubuntu-10-04 and that feels like my problem.) So I'm going to try
upgrading xserver-xorg-core to the bleeding edge. If this fixes my
problem, (because Xorg is no longer eating into CPU leaving space for
actual programs) then I'll report back, otherwise my system is still
running slower than normal.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951673

Title:
  CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/951673/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951673] Re: CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

2012-03-16 Thread Alexx Roche
I followed the advice on http://askubuntu.com/questions/100730/how-to-
upgrade-to-glx-1-3-on-ubuntu-10-04 and ended up with a broken X11
environment, (which, to be honest, the Xorg ppl said would happen.) I
just applied last nights updates and am going for a reboot.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951673

Title:
  CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/951673/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951673] Re: CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

2012-03-16 Thread Alexx Roche
At the risk of this report turning into a blog, I have an update.
Firefox has not crashed in the last four hours, (so I think that problem
is fixed.) I have been unable to determine a dependable kernel or
pattern that would enable me to boot into a working system where the
cores of my CPU are scaling. I wondered if rebooting into a different
kernel and then back would somehow toggle the original kernel, but the
two tests, (two reboots each) did not get me back to a "800MHz, 1.2GHz"
policy.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951673

Title:
  CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/951673/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1010434] [NEW] package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.28+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-08 Thread Alexx Roche
Public bug reported:

Not a fatal error. Using Ubuntu Software Centre to install Eclipse IDE:

installArchives() failed: Selecting previously deselected package 
eclipse-platform-data.
(Reading database ... 

(Reading database ... 100%
(Reading database ... 447489 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking eclipse-platform-data (from 
.../eclipse-platform-data_3.5.2-2ubuntu4_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libequinox-osgi-java.
Unpacking libequinox-osgi-java (from 
.../libequinox-osgi-java_3.5.2-2ubuntu4_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package xulrunner-1.9.2.
Unpacking xulrunner-1.9.2 (from 
.../xulrunner-1.9.2_1.9.2.28+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package eclipse-rcp.
Unpacking eclipse-rcp (from .../eclipse-rcp_3.5.2-2ubuntu4_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libcommons-codec-java.
Unpacking libcommons-codec-java (from .../libcommons-codec-java_1.4-2_all.deb) 
...
Selecting previously deselected package libcommons-el-java.
Unpacking libcommons-el-java (from .../libcommons-el-java_1.0-5_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libcommons-httpclient-java.
Unpacking libcommons-httpclient-java (from 
.../libcommons-httpclient-java_3.1-9_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libecj-java.
Unpacking libecj-java (from .../libecj-java_3.5.1-1_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libjasper-java.
Unpacking libjasper-java (from .../libjasper-java_5.5.26-5_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package realpath.
Unpacking realpath (from .../realpath_1.15build1_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package fastjar.
Unpacking fastjar (from .../fastjar_2%3a0.98-1ubuntu0.10.04.1_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package jarwrapper.
Unpacking jarwrapper (from .../jarwrapper_0.28_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package sat4j.
Unpacking sat4j (from .../archives/sat4j_2.1.1-3_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package eclipse-platform.
Unpacking eclipse-platform (from .../eclipse-platform_3.5.2-2ubuntu4_i386.deb) 
...
Processing triggers for hicolor-icon-theme ...
Processing triggers for doc-base ...
Processing 1 added doc-base file(s)...
Registering documents with scrollkeeper...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Processing triggers for install-info ...
Processing triggers for python-gmenu ...
Rebuilding /usr/share/applications/desktop.en_GB.UTF8.cache...
Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils ...
Processing triggers for python-support ...
Setting up eclipse-platform-data (3.5.2-2ubuntu4) ...
Setting up libequinox-osgi-java (3.5.2-2ubuntu4) ...
Setting up xulrunner-1.9.2 (1.9.2.28+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1) ...
/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.28/xulrunner-bin: 
/usr/lib/i486-linux-gnu/cmov/libssl3.so: version `NSS_3.12.6' not found 
(required by /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.28/libxul.so)
dpkg: error processing xulrunner-1.9.2 (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of eclipse-rcp:
 eclipse-rcp depends on xulrunner-1.9.2; however:
  Package xulrunner-1.9.2 is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing eclipse-rcp (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Setting up libcommons-codec-java (1.4-2) ...
No apport report written because the error message indicates its a followup 
error from a previous failure.
Setting up libcommons-el-java (1.0-5) ...
Setting up libcommons-httpclient-java (3.1-9) ...
Setting up libecj-java (3.5.1-1) ...
Setting up libjasper-java (5.5.26-5) ...
Setting up realpath (1.15build1) ...
Setting up fastjar (2:0.98-1ubuntu0.10.04.1) ...

Setting up jarwrapper (0.28) ...

Setting up sat4j (2.1.1-3) ...
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of eclipse-platform:
 eclipse-platform depends on eclipse-rcp (= 3.5.2-2ubuntu4); however:
  Package eclipse-rcp is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing eclipse-platform (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
No apport report written because the error message indicates its a followup 
error from a previous failure.
Errors were encountered while processing:
 xulrunner-1.9.2
 eclipse-rcp
 eclipse-platform
Setting up xulrunner-1.9.2 (1.9.2.28+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1) ...
/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.28/xulrunner-bin: 
/usr/lib/i486-linux-gnu/cmov/libssl3.so: version `NSS_3.12.6' not found 
(required by /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.28/libxul.so)
dpkg: error processing xulrunner-1.9.2 (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of eclipse-rcp:
 eclipse-rcp depends on xulrunner-1.9.2; however:
  Package xulrunner-1.9.2 is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing eclipse-rcp (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of eclipse-platform:
 eclipse-platform depends 

[Bug 1010434] Re: package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.28+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-08 Thread Alexx Roche
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010434

Title:
  package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.28+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1
  failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation
  script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9.2/+bug/1010434/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1005647] [NEW] package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.28+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-05-28 Thread Alexx Roche
Public bug reported:

aptitude install meld # threw this error even though meld installed just
fine. xulrunner seems to produce more errors than PulseAudio.

Not a fatal error from the users point-of-view

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.28+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-41.89-generic 2.6.32.59+drm33.24
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-41-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon May 28 21:40:07 2012
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5)
SourcePackage: xulrunner-1.9.2
Title: package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.28+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 
failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script 
returned error exit status 1

** Affects: xulrunner-1.9.2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005647

Title:
  package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.28+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1
  failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation
  script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9.2/+bug/1005647/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1005647] Re: package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.28+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-05-28 Thread Alexx Roche
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005647

Title:
  package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.28+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1
  failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation
  script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9.2/+bug/1005647/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951673] Re: CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

2012-05-29 Thread Alexx Roche
I've installed 2.6.32-41-generic and replaced the fan on the motherboard, and 
performance has returned to normal.
I've moved the CPU back to on-demand and scaling seems to be working again.

So if someone else has an old laptop and all signs point to the CPU
playing up... it might be the fan, (though if, like me, you spend all of
your time with headphones on you might not notice the fan stop.)

alexx

-- 
"I'm not doing nothing; I'm actively waiting for the problem to go away."

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951673

Title:
  CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/951673/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 924984] [NEW] right after do-release-upgrade from 9.10 to 10.04.3 package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.24+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installat

2012-02-01 Thread Alexx Roche
Public bug reported:

#After an (almost) problem free release upgrade:

root@laptop:/usr/local/src/monkey-0.31.0# aptitude update
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com lucid Release.gpg
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Translation-en_GB
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/restricted Translation-en_GB
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/universe Translation-en_GB
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/multiverse Translation-en_GB
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-updates Release.gpg
Ign http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Translation-en_GB
Ign http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/restricted 
Translation-en_GB
Ign http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/universe 
Translation-en_GB
Ign http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/multiverse 
Translation-en_GB
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-backports Release.gpg
Ign http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-backports/main Translation-en_GB
Ign http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-backports/restricted 
Translation-en_GB
Ign http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-backports/universe 
Translation-en_GB
Ign http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-backports/multiverse 
Translation-en_GB
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com lucid Release
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-updates Release
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-backports Release
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com lucid/main Packages
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com lucid/restricted Packages
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com lucid/universe Packages
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com lucid/multiverse Packages
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-updates/main Packages
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-updates/restricted Packages
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-updates/universe Packages
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-updates/multiverse Packages
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-backports/main Packages
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-backports/restricted Packages
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-backports/universe Packages
Hit http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com lucid-backports/multiverse Packages
Reading package lists... Done

root@laptop:/usr/local/src/monkey-0.31.0# aptitude upgrade
W: The "upgrade" command is deprecated; use "safe-upgrade" instead.
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information   
Initialising package states... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
  libboost-dev 
The following partially installed packages will be configured:
  couchdb-bin desktopcouch evolution-couchdb gnome-user-guide gwibber-service 
python-desktopcouch python-desktopcouch-records python-gtkmozembed 
  ubuntu-desktop ubuntu-docs xulrunner-1.9.2 yelp 
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used.
Writing extended state information... Done
Setting up xulrunner-1.9.2 (1.9.2.24+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1) ...
/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.24/xulrunner-bin: 
/usr/lib/i486-linux-gnu/cmov/libssl3.so: version `NSS_3.12.6' not found 
(required by /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.24/libxul.so)
dpkg: error processing xulrunner-1.9.2 (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of yelp:
 yelp depends on xulrunner-1.9.2; however:
  Package xulrunner-1.9.2 is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing yelp (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of gnome-user-guide:
 gnome-user-guide depends on yelp; however:
  Package yelp is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing gnome-user-guide (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of ubuntu-docs:
 ubuntu-docs depends on gnome-user-guide; however:
  Package gnome-user-guide is not configured yet.
 ubuntu-docs depends on yelp; however:
  Package yelp is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing ubuntu-docs (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of couchdb-bin:
 couchdb-bin depends on xulrunner-1.9.2; however:
  Package xulrunner-1.9.2 is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processNo apport report written because the error message indicates 
it's a follow-up error from a previous failure.

   No apport report written because 
the error message indicates it's a follow-up error from a previous failure.
No 
apport report written because MaxReports has already been reached

  

[Bug 924984] Re: right after do-release-upgrade from 9.10 to 10.04.3 package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.24+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installatio

2012-02-01 Thread Alexx Roche
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924984

Title:
  right after do-release-upgrade from 9.10 to 10.04.3 package
  xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.24+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9.2/+bug/924984/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 924984] Re: right after do-release-upgrade from 9.10 to 10.04.3 package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.24+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installatio

2012-02-01 Thread Alexx Roche
ldd /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.24/xulrunner-bin
linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0x007d2000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 (0x0052c000)
libmozjs.so => /usr/lib/i486-linux-gnu/cmov/libmozjs.so (0x00943000)
libxpcom.so => /usr/lib/i486-linux-gnu/cmov/libxpcom.so (0x0048e000)
libxul.so => not found
libplds4.so => /usr/lib/i486-linux-gnu/cmov/libplds4.so (0x00638000)
libplc4.so => /usr/lib/i486-linux-gnu/cmov/libplc4.so (0x00cbe000)
libnspr4.so => /usr/lib/i486-linux-gnu/cmov/libnspr4.so (0x00659000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0x00855000)
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x00cc2000)
libatk-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 (0x0031f000)
libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 (0x001a2000)
libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0x0011)
libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0x001c9000)
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x008aa000)
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 (0x00186000)
libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 (0x0021d000)
libpango-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 (0x00229000)
libcairo.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 (0x0026c000)
libgio-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0 (0x0033b000)
libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (0x003d9000)
libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (0x008a1000)
libgthread-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 (0x00bea000)
librt.so.1 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/librt.so.1 (0x001f9000)
libglib-2.0.so.0 => /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x0068a000)
libstartup-notification-1.so.0 => 
/usr/lib/libstartup-notification-1.so.0 (0x00202000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x1d72b000)
libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x00838000)
libasound.so.2 => /usr/lib/libasound.so.2 (0x009e5000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libm.so.6 (0x002e6000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x0d287000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00bf3000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0x027fc000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x005a9000)  
libxpcom_core.so => /usr/lib/i486-linux-gnu/cmov/libxpcom_core.so 
(0x00b0a000)
libXrender.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x0020b000)
libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0x00ae4000)
libXi.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x004cd000)
libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0x00314000)
libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0x00418000)
libXcomposite.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXcomposite.so.1 (0x00215000)
libXdamage.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXdamage.so.1 (0x00219000)
libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0x00bc2000)
libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x00422000)
libexpat.so.1 => /lib/libexpat.so.1 (0x00437000)
libpixman-1.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpixman-1.so.0 (0x00545000)
libdirectfb-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libdirectfb-1.2.so.0 (0x00754000)
libfusion-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libfusion-1.2.so.0 (0x0045e000)
libdirect-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libdirect-1.2.so.0 (0x00468000)
libpng12.so.0 => /lib/libpng12.so.0 (0x00491000)
libxcb-render-util.so.0 => /usr/lib/libxcb-render-util.so.0 (0x0030c000)
libxcb-render.so.0 => /usr/lib/libxcb-render.so.0 (0x0047e000)
libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1 (0x004db000)
libpcre.so.3 => /lib/libpcre.so.3 (0x004f5000)
libresolv.so.2 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libresolv.so.2 (0x004b6000)
libselinux.so.1 => /lib/libselinux.so.1 (0x005c6000)
libxcb-aux.so.0 => /usr/lib/libxcb-aux.so.0 (0x00486000)
libxcb-event.so.1 => /usr/lib/libxcb-event.so.1 (0x0048a000)
libxcb-atom.so.1 => /usr/lib/libxcb-atom.so.1 (0x00526000)
libSM.so.6 => /usr/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x0059f000)
libICE.so.6 => /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x005e1000)
libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x005fa000)
libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x005fe000)
libuuid.so.1 => /lib/libuuid.so.1 (0x00604000)


p.s.Importance is ultra-low (or "cool-story bro' " status)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924984

Title:
  right after do-release-upgrade from 9.10 to 10.04.3 package
  xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.24+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9.2/+bug/924984/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 924984] Re: right after do-release-upgrade from 9.10 to 10.04.3 package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.24+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installatio

2012-02-01 Thread Alexx Roche
# Not a problem
ldd /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.24/libxul.so
/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.24/libxul.so: /usr/lib/i486-linux-gnu/cmov/libssl3.so: 
version `NSS_3.12.6' not found (required by /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.24/libxul.
so)
linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0x0022a000) 
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 (0x0062e000)
libsqlite3.so.0 => /usr/lib/libsqlite3.so.0 (0x0011)
libmozjs.so => /usr/lib/i486-linux-gnu/cmov/libmozjs.so (0x008c6000)
libssl3.so => /usr/lib/i486-linux-gnu/cmov/libssl3.so (0x00193000)
libsmime3.so => /usr/lib/i486-linux-gnu/cmov/libsmime3.so (0x001c)
libnss3.so => /usr/lib/i486-linux-gnu/cmov/libnss3.so (0x0022b000)
libnssutil3.so => /usr/lib/i486-linux-gnu/cmov/libnssutil3.so 
(0x00486000)
libcairo.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 (0x00333000)
libpixman-1.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpixman-1.so.0 (0x003ad000)
libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0x00407000)
libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0x00502000)
libXrender.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x005bd000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x009c4000)
libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x001e3000)
libhunspell-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libhunspell-1.2.so.0 (0x00cd2000)
libplds4.so => /usr/lib/i486-linux-gnu/cmov/libplds4.so (0x001f8000)
libplc4.so => /usr/lib/i486-linux-gnu/cmov/libplc4.so (0x001fb000)
libnspr4.so => /usr/lib/i486-linux-gnu/cmov/libnspr4.so (0x0049c000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0x008ac000)
libdbus-1.so.3 => /lib/libdbus-1.so.3 (0x00532000)
librt.so.1 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/librt.so.1 (0x007d2000)
libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x001ff000)
libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 (0x004cd000)
libpango-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 (0x0056b000)
libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (0x005e2000)
libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (0x0067c000)
libgthread-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 (0x0078b000)
libglib-2.0.so.0 => /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x00681000)
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x1061a000)
libatk-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 (0x00647000)
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x007db000)
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 (0x0020f000)
libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 (0x004f4000)
libgio-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0 (0x00ae1000)
libXt.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x00968000)
libstartup-notification-1.so.0 => 
/usr/lib/libstartup-notification-1.so.0 (0x0047d000)
libasound.so.2 => /usr/lib/libasound.so.2 (0x00b7f000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libm.so.6 (0x00c92000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x19318000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x0074b000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0x08557000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00d87000)
 libdirectfb-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libdirectfb-1.2.so.0 (0x05401000)
libfusion-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libfusion-1.2.so.0 (0x005ae000)
libdirect-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libdirect-1.2.so.0 (0x005c7000)
libpng12.so.0 => /lib/libpng12.so.0 (0x00791000)
libxcb-render-util.so.0 => /usr/lib/libxcb-render-util.so.0 (0x005b8000)
libxcb-render.so.0 => /usr/lib/libxcb-render.so.0 (0x00621000)
libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1 (0x0076a000)
libexpat.so.1 => /lib/libexpat.so.1 (0x00871000)
libpcre.so.3 => /lib/libpcre.so.3 (0x00c47000)
libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0x00d5)
libXi.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x00663000)
libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0x00671000)
libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0x007b6000)
libXcomposite.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXcomposite.so.1 (0x005dd000)
libXdamage.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXdamage.so.1 (0x00629000)
libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0x00784000)
libresolv.so.2 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libresolv.so.2 (0x00d6b000)
libselinux.so.1 => /lib/libselinux.so.1 (0x00d18000)
libSM.so.6 => /usr/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x007c)
libICE.so.6 => /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x00c78000)
libxcb-aux.so.0 => /usr/lib/libxcb-aux.so.0 (0x007c9000)
libxcb-event.so.1 => /usr/lib/libxcb-event.so.1 (0x007cd000)
libxcb-atom.so.1 => /usr/lib/libxcb-atom.so.1 (0x00898000)
libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x00d5b000)
libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x0089d000)
libuuid.so.1 => /lib/libuuid.so.1 (0x008a3000)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924984

Title:
  right after do-release-upgrade from 9

[Bug 924984] Re: right after do-release-upgrade from 9.10 to 10.04.3 package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.24+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installatio

2012-02-02 Thread Alexx Roche
** Changed in: xulrunner-1.9.2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Opinion

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924984

Title:
  right after do-release-upgrade from 9.10 to 10.04.3 package
  xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.24+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9.2/+bug/924984/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 924984] Re: right after do-release-upgrade from 9.10 to 10.04.3 package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.24+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installatio

2012-02-07 Thread Alexx Roche
resolved using: (simple, but then why didn't do-release-upgrade do
this?)

aptitude remove xulrunner-1.9.2 python-gtkmozembed couchdb-bin yelp
gnome-user-guide python-desktopcouch python-desktopcouch-records -y

** Changed in: xulrunner-1.9.2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Opinion => Fix Released

** Changed in: xulrunner-1.9.2 (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Alexx Roche (ubuntu-one-alexx)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924984

Title:
  right after do-release-upgrade from 9.10 to 10.04.3 package
  xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.24+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9.2/+bug/924984/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951673] Re: CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

2012-03-10 Thread Alexx Roche
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951673

Title:
  CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/951673/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951673] [NEW] CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

2012-03-10 Thread Alexx Roche
Public bug reported:

After last nights update (update-manager) old laptop was no longer able
to play video or flash-video fast enough, (looked like a slid-show at
best) though the audio worked fine.

Booting into 2.6.32-38-generic fixed the issue, but

echo $(uname -r) $(cpufreq-info |grep 'current policy'|sed 's/.*within//')
2.6.32-38-generic 800 MHz and 800 MHz. 800 MHz and 800 MHz.

(though this may be /etc/init.d/ondemand kicking in.)

(Lucid Linx on Intel Centrino Duo Dell Latitude D420 with 2Gig of RAM)

I have checked the BIOS and SpeedStep is enabled.

If I boot into 2.6.31-14-generic then the 'current policy' is "800 MHz
and 1.20 GHz"

cat /proc/version_signature 
Ubuntu 2.6.32-38.83-generic 2.6.32.52+drm33.21

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: linux-generic 2.6.32.39.46
Regression: Yes
Reproducible: Yes
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-38.83-generic 2.6.32.52+drm33.21
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-38-generic i686
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.21.
Architecture: i386
ArecordDevices:
  List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices 
 card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  alexx  2248 F pulseaudio
Card0.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xefebc000 irq 21'
   Mixer name   : 'SigmaTel STAC9200'
   Components   : 'HDA:83847690,102801d6,00102201'
   Controls  : 13
   Simple ctrls  : 8
Date: Sat Mar 10 18:10:15 2012
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=18512727-1247-4647-a30d-b358cc4f852f
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5)
MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude D420
PccardctlIdent:
 Socket 0:
   no product info available
PccardctlStatus:
 Socket 0:
   no card
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-38-generic 
root=UUID=12451b00-83c2-4c8f-978e-12f5b9602f1e ro quiet splash
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.34.7
SourcePackage: linux
dmi.bios.date: 12/18/2006
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: A03
dmi.board.asset.tag: 9004588
dmi.board.name: 0TJ984
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 9004588
dmi.chassis.type: 8
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA03:bd12/18/2006:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeD420:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0TJ984:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr:
dmi.product.name: Latitude D420
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 kconfig lucid needs-upstream-testing regression-update

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951673

Title:
  CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/951673/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951712] [NEW] CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

2012-03-10 Thread Alexx Roche
Public bug reported:

After last nights update (update-manager) old laptop was no longer able
to play video or flash-video fast enough, (looked like a slid-show at
best) though the audio worked fine.

Booting into 2.6.32-38-generic fixed the issue, but

echo $(uname -r) $(cpufreq-info |grep 'current policy'|sed 's/.*within//')
2.6.32-38-generic 800 MHz and 800 MHz. 800 MHz and 800 MHz.

(though this may be /etc/init.d/ondemand kicking in.)

(Lucid Linx on Intel Centrino Duo Dell Latitude D420 with 2Gig of RAM)

I have checked the BIOS and SpeedStep is enabled.

If I boot into 2.6.31-14-generic then the 'current policy' is "800 MHz
and 1.20 GHz"

cat /proc/version_signature 
Ubuntu 2.6.32-38.83-generic 2.6.32.52+drm33.21

grep fail /var/log/boot.log 
 * CPUFreq Utilities: Setting ondemand CPUFreq governor...   [fail] 
 * CPU1...

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: linux-generic 2.6.32.39.46
Regression: Yes
Reproducible: Yes
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-38.83-generic 2.6.32.52+drm33.21
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-38-generic i686
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.21.
Architecture: i386
ArecordDevices:
  List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices 
 card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  alexx  2248 F pulseaudio
Card0.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xefebc000 irq 21'
   Mixer name   : 'SigmaTel STAC9200'
   Components   : 'HDA:83847690,102801d6,00102201'
   Controls  : 13
   Simple ctrls  : 8
Date: Sat Mar 10 18:10:15 2012
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=18512727-1247-4647-a30d-b358cc4f852f
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5)
MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude D420
PccardctlIdent:
 Socket 0:
   no product info available
PccardctlStatus:
 Socket 0:
   no card
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-38-generic 
root=UUID=12451b00-83c2-4c8f-978e-12f5b9602f1e ro quiet splash
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.34.7
SourcePackage: linux
dmi.bios.date: 12/18/2006
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: A03
dmi.board.asset.tag: 9004588
dmi.board.name: 0TJ984
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 9004588
dmi.chassis.type: 8
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA03:bd12/18/2006:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeD420:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0TJ984:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr:
dmi.product.name: Latitude D420
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed


** Tags: apport-bug i386 kconfig lucid needs-upstream-testing regression-update

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951712

Title:
  CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/951712/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951712] Re: CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

2012-03-10 Thread Alexx Roche
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951712

Title:
  CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/951712/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951712] Re: CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

2012-03-10 Thread Alexx Roche
I found a workaround: ( if you still have the 2.6.31-14 kernel installed
then) open a terminal and paste in the following)

sudo su -
kern_img=$(grep 2.6.31-14 /boot/grub/grub.cfg |grep menuentry|grep -v 
recovery|sed -e "s/' .*/'/" -e 's/menuentry //')
sed -i "s/GRUB_DEFAULT.*/GRUB_DEFAULT=$kern_img/" /etc/default/grub
grep 2.6.31-14 /etc/default/grub || sed -i "s/GRUB_DEFAULT.*/GRUB_DEFAULT=0/" 
/etc/default/grub
update-grub
reboot

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951712

Title:
  CPU Frequency Scaling broken ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/951712/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 665187] [NEW] ldns-keygen not working

2010-10-22 Thread Alexx Roche
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: ldnsutils

I installed ldnsutils, (and libldns-dev libldns1) so that I could use 
ldns-keygen.
On my other linux system it creates two files and outputs the base filename 
from the command

$ ldns-keygen -a hmac-sha1 -b 160 alexx.net

but on Ubuntu 9.10 \n \l (all patched last night with apt-get update &&
apt-get upgrade) I get:

*** glibc detected *** ldns-keygen: free(): invalid next size (fast): 
0x08abd100 ***
=== Backtrace: =
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0x17b0d1]
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0x17c7d2]
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(cfree+0x6d)[0x17f8ad]
/usr/lib/libldns.so.1(ldns_key2rr+0x32e)[0x49d28e]
ldns-keygen[0x8049340]
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe6)[0x126b56]
ldns-keygen[0x8048d71]
=== Memory map: 
0011-0024e000 r-xp  08:05 193739 
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.10.1.so
0024e000-0024f000 ---p 0013e000 08:05 193739 
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.10.1.so
0024f000-00251000 r--p 0013e000 08:05 193739 
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.10.1.so
00251000-00252000 rw-p 0014 08:05 193739 
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.10.1.so
00252000-00255000 rw-p  00:00 0
002ec000-0030 r-xp  08:05 677/lib/libz.so.1.2.3.3
0030-00301000 r--p 00013000 08:05 677/lib/libz.so.1.2.3.3
00301000-00302000 rw-p 00014000 08:05 677/lib/libz.so.1.2.3.3
0038f000-0039 r-xp  00:00 0  [vdso]
00473000-004b1000 r-xp  08:05 4928   /usr/lib/libldns.so.1.5.1
004b1000-004b2000 r--p 0003d000 08:05 4928   /usr/lib/libldns.so.1.5.1
004b2000-004b5000 rw-p 0003e000 08:05 4928   /usr/lib/libldns.so.1.5.1
0065f000-0067b000 r-xp  08:05 3389   /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
0067b000-0067c000 r--p 0001b000 08:05 3389   /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
0067c000-0067d000 rw-p 0001c000 08:05 3389   /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
009a-00acd000 r-xp  08:05 24578  
/lib/i686/cmov/libcrypto.so.0.9.8
00acd000-00ad5000 r--p 0012c000 08:05 24578  
/lib/i686/cmov/libcrypto.so.0.9.8
00ad5000-00ae2000 rw-p 00134000 08:05 24578  
/lib/i686/cmov/libcrypto.so.0.9.8
00ae2000-00ae6000 rw-p  00:00 0
00c68000-00c99000 r-xp  08:05 4045   /usr/lib/libpcap.so.1.0.0
00c99000-00c9a000 r--p 00031000 08:05 4045   /usr/lib/libpcap.so.1.0.0
00c9a000-00c9b000 rw-p 00032000 08:05 4045   /usr/lib/libpcap.so.1.0.0
00ca8000-00cc3000 r-xp  08:05 38872  /lib/ld-2.10.1.so
00cc3000-00cc4000 r--p 0001a000 08:05 38872  /lib/ld-2.10.1.so
00cc4000-00cc5000 rw-p 0001b000 08:05 38872  /lib/ld-2.10.1.so
00d92000-00d94000 r-xp  08:05 193877 
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl-2.10.1.so
00d94000-00d95000 r--p 1000 08:05 193877 
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl-2.10.1.so
00d95000-00d96000 rw-p 2000 08:05 193877 
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl-2.10.1.so
00f01000-00f14000 r-xp  08:05 195218 
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnsl-2.10.1.so
00f14000-00f15000 r--p 00012000 08:05 195218 
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnsl-2.10.1.so
00f15000-00f16000 rw-p 00013000 08:05 195218 
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnsl-2.10.1.so
00f16000-00f18000 rw-p  00:00 0
08048000-0804a000 r-xp  08:05 4936   /usr/bin/ldns-keygen
0804a000-0804b000 r--p 2000 08:05 4936   /usr/bin/ldns-keygen
0804b000-0804c000 rw-p 3000 08:05 4936   /usr/bin/ldns-keygen
08abd000-08ade000 rw-p  00:00 0  [heap]
b770-b7721000 rw-p  00:00 0
b7721000-b780 ---p  00:00 0
b7893000-b7896000 rw-p  00:00 0
b78ad000-b78af000 rw-p  00:00 0
bfb6d000-bfb82000 rw-p  00:00 0  [stack]
Aborted

I apt-get remove(d) *ldns* and downloaded the src from 
http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/projects/ldns/
compiled it long hand (including the /examples), and then got

ldns-keygen: error while loading shared libraries: libldns.so.1: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory

so I apt-get -y installed  libldns-dev libldns1

and ldns-keygen started working. I don't know what is wrong or where.

** Affects: ldns (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
ldns-keygen not working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665187
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs