[Bug 1023860] [NEW] Wish uif had ipv6 support
Public bug reported: I have found uif to be a nice and simple way to manage my packet filters over the years and just wish it could manage my ip6tables firewalls as well! I have started to add this support and am tracking that in debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/679744 Assistance and comments would be appreciated. In an ideal world the nicest approach would be to have one set of uif input files which create both iptables and ip6tables rules. However an easier approach is to add a "-6" switch to uif which when ommitted uif runs a an ipv4 firewall as normal, but when -6 is used a different config file is used by default and ip6tables is used instead. The patches in http://bugs.debian.org/679744 are to implement the easy approach! Regards Alex Owen ** Affects: uif (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1023860 Title: Wish uif had ipv6 support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uif/+bug/1023860/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1023860] Re: Wish uif had ipv6 support
Yesterday a debdiff was posted to the debian bug tracking this issue. The patch provides an ipv6 capable uif with an ipv6 capable init script and documentation. The ipv6 features are disabled by default so as to give consistent behaviour on upgrades, but easy to enable by putting an ipv6 ruleset at /etc/uif/uif6.conf, setting IPV6MODE=1 in /etc/default/uif and then loading the rules with "/etc/init.d/uif start". If you wish me to produce a debdiff patch specifically for the ubuntu package I will see what I can do. Regrads Alex Owen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1023860 Title: Wish uif had ipv6 support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uif/+bug/1023860/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 617328] Re: space is a bad choice for seperator for Unattended-Upgrade::Allowed-Origins
For a "fix" for 10.04 try the lenny patch from the debian bug report. Specifically: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=27;filename=u-u-lenny.patch;att=1;bug=536754 >From debian bug: http://bugs.debian.org/536754 Alex Owen On 13 July 2011 19:54, Petar Maric <617...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Any chance of backporting this fix to 10.04? > > Thanks > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/617328 > > Title: > space is a bad choice for seperator for Unattended-Upgrade::Allowed- > Origins > > Status in “unattended-upgrades” package in Ubuntu: > Fix Released > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: unattended-upgrades > > http://bugs.debian.org/536754 > > I know ubuntu is not debian but for unattended-upgrades it appears > that ubuntu is upstream. > > Some well known and well used repos have spaces in either of both of their > "origin" and "archive" > debian-multimedisa has the string "Unofficial Multimedia Packages" > backports.org also has a space in it's origin. > > Perhaps the simplest solution is to change to using a ":" as the separator. > The origin strings come from Releases files which by inspection have the > format: > : > And so presumably ":" cannot be in the . > > Would you accept patches to do this? > > I guess you will want a patch that falls back to using a space > separator (for backwards compatibility) if there is no ":" seperator. > > > I am about to send a similar bug update to the debian bug #536754, I will > then work on a backwards compatible debian patch then a backwards compatible > ubuntu patch. > > Please comment if you think this is a bad plan? > > Alex Owen > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/617328/+subscriptions > ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #536754 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536754 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/617328 Title: space is a bad choice for seperator for Unattended-Upgrade::Allowed- Origins To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/617328/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 617328] [NEW] space is a bad choice for seperator for Unattended-Upgrade::Allowed-Origins
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: unattended-upgrades http://bugs.debian.org/536754 I know ubuntu is not debian but for unattended-upgrades it appears that ubuntu is upstream. Some well known and well used repos have spaces in either of both of their "origin" and "archive" debian-multimedisa has the string "Unofficial Multimedia Packages" backports.org also has a space in it's origin. Perhaps the simplest solution is to change to using a ":" as the separator. The origin strings come from Releases files which by inspection have the format: : And so presumably ":" cannot be in the . Would you accept patches to do this? I guess you will want a patch that falls back to using a space separator (for backwards compatibility) if there is no ":" seperator. I am about to send a similar bug update to the debian bug #536754, I will then work on a backwards compatible debian patch then a backwards compatible ubuntu patch. Please comment if you think this is a bad plan? Alex Owen ** Affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- space is a bad choice for seperator for Unattended-Upgrade::Allowed-Origins https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/617328 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 617328] Re: space is a bad choice for seperator for Unattended-Upgrade::Allowed-Origins
This is a simple patch to unattended-upgrade (revision 138) Which I downloaded from: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/unattended-upgrades/ubuntu/annotate/head%3A/unattended-upgrade I hope this is sufficient. Alex Owen ** Patch added: "u-u.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/617328/+attachment/1488039/+files/u-u.patch -- space is a bad choice for seperator for Unattended-Upgrade::Allowed-Origins https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/617328 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 617328] Re: space is a bad choice for seperator for Unattended-Upgrade::Allowed-Origins
Oops, Correct patch now attached. Sorry about that! ** Patch added: "u-u.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/617328/+attachment/1488117/+files/u-u.patch -- space is a bad choice for seperator for Unattended-Upgrade::Allowed-Origins https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/617328 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
