Ok
Pada Sel, 19 Nov 2024, 05.29, Gerald Combs menulis:
> On 11/18/24 9:08 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> >
> > The message about the spam was in fact spam.
> > But, it forged a valid From: so it got through.
> >
> > I'd like to fix the SPF/DKIM/spam-filter such that it more aggressively
> kills
> > this kind of forgery, assuming that wireshark.org has the right
> policies set.
> > This kind of thing is fraught with false-positives, but there are some
> > reasonable howtos.
>
> wireshark.org should have valid SPF and DKIM records. If the problem is
> limited to my address, I can subscribe from another one and you can just
> block my wireshark.org address if that's easier.
> ___
> tcpdump-workers mailing list -- tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to tcpdump-workers-le...@lists.tcpdump.org
> %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
>
___
tcpdump-workers mailing list -- tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tcpdump-workers-le...@lists.tcpdump.org
%(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
