Re: [tcpdump-workers] Proposed update to DLT_BLUETOOTH_LE_LL_WITH_PHDR
--- Begin Message --- On Jul 10, 2020, at 2:57 PM, Sultan Khan wrote: > Link to the updated version of the spec with the latest changes: > https://gistcdn.githack.com/sultanqasim/8b6561309f5934f084a0d938ae733b7a/raw/199fb1867642c927f768fe7d67dae2a639acb48e/LINKTYPE_BLUETOOTH_LE_LL_WITH_PHDR.html So https://www.tcpdump.org/linktypes.html currently links to http://www.whiterocker.com/bt/LINKTYPE_BLUETOOTH_LE_LL_WITH_PHDR.html for LINKTYPE_BLUETOOTH_LE_LL_WITH_PHDR. What should it link to now? --- End Message --- ___ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Re: [tcpdump-workers] Proposed update to DLT_BLUETOOTH_LE_LL_WITH_PHDR
--- Begin Message --- Hmm. Chris Kilgour (whiterocker) originally created the spec, and the version on tcpdump.org was just a backup copy. Now, Chris has said that he is no longer active in the Bluetooth LE sniffing space, and he doesn’t want to be in charge of the spec any more. Perhaps the spec on tcpdump.org can be the definitive spec now? Do you think we should link to the old spec on whiterocker.com, noting it’s the previous version? Chris - do you have an opinion on this? Thanks, Sultan > On Jul 13, 2020, at 3:53 AM, Guy Harris wrote: > > On Jul 10, 2020, at 2:57 PM, Sultan Khan wrote: > >> Link to the updated version of the spec with the latest changes: >> https://gistcdn.githack.com/sultanqasim/8b6561309f5934f084a0d938ae733b7a/raw/199fb1867642c927f768fe7d67dae2a639acb48e/LINKTYPE_BLUETOOTH_LE_LL_WITH_PHDR.html > > So > >https://www.tcpdump.org/linktypes.html > > currently links to > >http://www.whiterocker.com/bt/LINKTYPE_BLUETOOTH_LE_LL_WITH_PHDR.html > > for LINKTYPE_BLUETOOTH_LE_LL_WITH_PHDR. What should it link to now? > > > > > --- End Message --- ___ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Re: [tcpdump-workers] Proposed update to DLT_BLUETOOTH_LE_LL_WITH_PHDR
--- Begin Message --- Thanks Chris. I’ll make a pull request to tcpdump-htdocs later today, and I’ll include a link to the previous version of the spec as an archive.org link to the old one on whiterocker.com. Cheers, Sultan >>> On Jul 13, 2020, at 11:54 AM, Chris Kilgour wrote: >> On 2020-07-13 8:09 a.m., Sultan Khan wrote: >> Hmm. Chris Kilgour (whiterocker) originally created the spec, and the >> version on tcpdump.org was just a backup copy. Now, Chris has said that he >> is no longer active in the Bluetooth LE sniffing space, and he doesn’t want >> to be in charge of the spec any more. >> Perhaps the spec on tcpdump.org can be the definitive spec now? >> Do you think we should link to the old spec on whiterocker.com, noting it’s >> the previous version? >> Chris - do you have an opinion on this? > > Since my interest has faded over the past several years, I'm okay with > anything the group decides. > >> Thanks, >> Sultan --- End Message --- ___ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Re: [tcpdump-workers] Proposed update to DLT_BLUETOOTH_LE_LL_WITH_PHDR
--- Begin Message --- On Jul 13, 2020, at 9:02 AM, Sultan Khan wrote: > Thanks Chris. I’ll make a pull request to tcpdump-htdocs later today, and > I’ll include a link to the previous version of the spec as an archive.org > link to the old one on whiterocker.com. The new version is a superset of the old version, so that any header that conforms to the old version also conforms to the new version, right? If so, I don't see any need for an archive.org link to the old version.--- End Message --- ___ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Re: [tcpdump-workers] Proposed update to DLT_BLUETOOTH_LE_LL_WITH_PHDR
--- Begin Message --- Correct, it's a superset of the old version. OK, I'll omit the link then. On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:11 PM Guy Harris wrote: > On Jul 13, 2020, at 9:02 AM, Sultan Khan wrote: > > > Thanks Chris. I’ll make a pull request to tcpdump-htdocs later today, > and I’ll include a link to the previous version of the spec as an > archive.org link to the old one on whiterocker.com. > > The new version is a superset of the old version, so that any header that > conforms to the old version also conforms to the new version, right? > > If so, I don't see any need for an archive.org link to the old version. --- End Message --- ___ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Re: [tcpdump-workers] Proposed update to DLT_BLUETOOTH_LE_LL_WITH_PHDR
--- Begin Message --- Pull request submitted: https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group/tcpdump-htdocs/pull/17 On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:49 PM Sultan Khan via tcpdump-workers < tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org> wrote: > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Sultan Khan > To: Guy Harris > Cc: Chris Kilgour , tcpdump-workers < > tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org>, Joakim Andersson < > joakim.anders...@nordicsemi.no>, virtual...@gmail.com > Bcc: > Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 13:51:48 -0400 > Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] Proposed update to > DLT_BLUETOOTH_LE_LL_WITH_PHDR > Correct, it's a superset of the old version. OK, I'll omit the link then. > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:11 PM Guy Harris wrote: > > > On Jul 13, 2020, at 9:02 AM, Sultan Khan wrote: > > > > > Thanks Chris. I’ll make a pull request to tcpdump-htdocs later today, > > and I’ll include a link to the previous version of the spec as an > > archive.org link to the old one on whiterocker.com. > > > > The new version is a superset of the old version, so that any header that > > conforms to the old version also conforms to the new version, right? > > > > If so, I don't see any need for an archive.org link to the old version. > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Sultan Khan via tcpdump-workers > To: Guy Harris > Cc: Chris Kilgour , virtual...@gmail.com, Joakim > Andersson , tcpdump-workers < > tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org> > Bcc: > Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 13:51:48 -0400 > Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] Proposed update to > DLT_BLUETOOTH_LE_LL_WITH_PHDR > ___ > tcpdump-workers mailing list > tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org > https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers > --- End Message --- ___ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Re: [tcpdump-workers] Proposed update to DLT_BLUETOOTH_LE_LL_WITH_PHDR
--- Begin Message --- On Jul 13, 2020, at 8:09 AM, Sultan Khan wrote: > Hmm. Chris Kilgour (whiterocker) originally created the spec, and the version > on tcpdump.org was just a backup copy. Now, Chris has said that he is no > longer active in the Bluetooth LE sniffing space, and he doesn’t want to be > in charge of the spec any more. Does this also apply to the LINKTYPE_BLUETOOTH_BREDR_BB specification?--- End Message --- ___ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Re: [tcpdump-workers] Proposed update to DLT_BLUETOOTH_LE_LL_WITH_PHDR
--- Begin Message --- I think so, based on what Chris said previously about those BT related spec pages hosted on his site. The link type list page should probably be updated to point to the tcpdump.org version of the LINKTYPE_BLUETOOTH_BREDR_BB spec. Sultan >> On Jul 13, 2020, at 3:20 PM, Guy Harris wrote: > On Jul 13, 2020, at 8:09 AM, Sultan Khan wrote: > >> Hmm. Chris Kilgour (whiterocker) originally created the spec, and the >> version on tcpdump.org was just a backup copy. Now, Chris has said that he >> is no longer active in the Bluetooth LE sniffing space, and he doesn’t want >> to be in charge of the spec any more. > > Does this also apply to the LINKTYPE_BLUETOOTH_BREDR_BB specification? --- End Message --- ___ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
