[tcpdump-workers] autoconf 2.61 versus 2.68

2013-04-13 Thread François-Xavier Le Bail
Hello,

Tha last configure file is "Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.61.".

The previous was "Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68.".

Is there any risks of regression ?

Francois-Xavier

___
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers


Re: [tcpdump-workers] autoconf 2.61 versus 2.68

2013-04-13 Thread Michael Richardson

> "ois-Xavier" == ois-Xavier Le Bail  writes:
ois-Xavier> Tha last configure file is "Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.61.".

ois-Xavier> The previous was "Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68.".

ois-Xavier> Is there any risks of regression ?

oh, I thought it was updating the other way when I was reading the diff.
hmm.

___
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers


Re: [tcpdump-workers] autoconf 2.61 versus 2.68

2013-04-13 Thread Guy Harris

On Apr 13, 2013, at 3:01 AM, François-Xavier Le Bail  
wrote:

> Tha last configure file is "Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.61.".
> 
> The previous was "Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68.".
> 
> Is there any risks of regression ?

If we want to ensure that the configuration scripts we ship are generated by a 
particular version of autoconf, we should remove configure from the repository, 
add an autogen.sh script to re-generate the configure file, and ensure that 
it's run as part of the release-tarball building process.
___
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers