[SM-USERS] problems logging on
Okay. I had the login page bookmarked for some time. Never had a problem accessing the site. Recently (maybe about 3 weeks or so) when I click onto my bookmark, a page comes up stating that the page cannot be found (cannot find the server). Occasionally, maybe about once or twice a day if I am lucky, I can access the page via the normal routine. But, for some reason, most of the time I encounter the unable to find server message. The version that I have is 1.4.2. Not that that should really make a difference. Any suggestions?
[SM-USERS] [FWD: Password Change Required]
Greeting: I just though you should know that someone appears to be sending out scam emails from you email service trying to steal people's internet banking password and account information. I would like a reply from you on what you will be doing about this problem. Below please find a copy of the scam email with full header information as well as the forwarded email its self below that. Please be advised that I have already talked to Chase Banking and have sent them the email and copy with the full header information. They told me that they have talked to a number of other people this week about this same problem. So they know about it and will be working toward catching the person or persons responsible for the fraudulent emails. Using this part of the email address ( mail.mauwing.com ) I came up with your SquirrelMail login page. Doing a search on line for 'SquirrelMail" I found you main site page and got this email address from your site. Thank You John === Received: (qmail 4169 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2005 14:10:37 -Received: from unknown (HELO pre-smtp02-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) ([64.202.166.25]) (envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) by smtp08-02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 30 Sep 2005 14:10:37 -Received: (qmail 5804 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2005 14:10:37 -Received: from unknown (HELO mail.mauwing.com) ([202.64.115.210]) (envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) by pre-smtp02-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 30 Sep 2005 14:10:36 -Received: (qmail 1704 invoked by uid 573); 30 Sep 2005 14:06:33 -Date: 30 Sep 2005 14:06:33 -Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Password Change RequiredFrom: Chase Online Banking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Content-Type: text/htmlX-Spam: Statistical 65% Password change required! Dear sir, We recently have determined that different computers have logged onto your Chase user profile account, and multiple password failures were present before the logons. We strongly advice CHANGE YOUR PASSWORD. If this is not completed by September 31, 2005, we will be forced to suspend your account indefinitely, as it may have been used for fraudulent purposes. Thank you for your cooperation. Click here to Change Your Password Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. We apologize for any inconvenience. Thank you for using Chase! Please do not reply to this e-mail. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered. === Original Message Subject: Password Change RequiredFrom: Chase Online Banking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Fri, September 30, 2005 10:06 amTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Password change required! Dear sir, We recently have determined that different computers have logged onto your Chase user profile account, and multiple password failures were present before the logons. We strongly advice CHANGE YOUR PASSWORD. If this is not completed by September 31, 2005, we will be forced to suspend your account indefinitely, as it may have been used for fraudulent purposes. Thank you for your cooperation. Click here to Change Your Password Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. We apologize for any inconvenience.Thank you for using Chase! Please do not reply to this e-mail. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] shared folders with courier-imap?
I note that there is already a thread with this subject and I wish to link this post to it. My first question is, simply, how? reference: Denis Jacobi Re: shared folders with courier-imap? 2006-03-07 17:04 In this post, a solution in the form of a new imap-mailbox.php file is proposed and the comment 'Don't know if it works with file permission based shared folders' is made. Having set my courier-imap up for just this technique and incorporated the modified file, I can say that it does not work and seek guidance on the necessary steps to rectify this, since both my Nokia mobile and Mozilla Thunderbird (albeit unreliably) both do work with this configuration. Many thanks in advance John SuSe Linux 10.0 Apache 2.0.54 Courier-IMAP 4.0.4 SquirrelMail 1.4.5 PHP 4.4.0 --- All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] shared folders with courier-imap?
Fredrik Jervfors wrote: I note that there is already a thread with this subject and I wish to link this post to it. My first question is, simply, how? Reply to a mail in that thread. Sincerely, Fredrik. Seems simple on the face of it but at 'http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user/28000/match=courier+imap+shared+permission' in the archives, I could not find a reply button. (Hence my question) How do I now link onto that thread? John --- All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] reopening an archived thread
How can I attach new questions to what seems to be a closed archive thread from earlier this year? The last post on the thread is at 'http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user/28000/match=courier+imap+shared+permission' Many Thanks John --- All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] reopening an archived thread
Fredrik Jervfors wrote: How can I attach new questions to what seems to be a closed archive thread from earlier this year? The last post on the thread is at 'http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user/28000/match=courier +imap+shared+permission' You can't, unless you can get an unmodified copy of the mail you want to reply to and reply to it, or get the message ID for the mail you want to reply to and manipulate the "References" and "In-Reply-To" headers in your reply. Some mail archives allows you to download the archive as a mbox file, but I haven't found one with supports that and at the same time archives SquirrelMail lists. Sincerely, Fredrik. Thanks for clarifying that! --- All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] file permission based shared folders
I am in the process of configuring a new email system for a small outlet of three workstations, one server and two users. How can I persuade SquirrelMail to show my file permission based shared folders from my Courier-IMAP server? I've checked the posting archives and found Denis Jacobi's discussion re virtual folders but in his post at 'http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user/28000/match=courier+imap+shared+permission' he make the comment 'Don't know if it works with file permission based shared folders'. Having tried his amended imap-mailbox.php in my configuration, I find that it does not and now seek guidance on the necessary steps to rectify this, since both my Nokia mobile and Mozilla Thunderbird (albeit unreliably) both do work with this configuration. Many Thanks, in advance John --- All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] SOLVED - file permission based shared folders
Nobody from this list could seemingly be bothered to point out that simply by changing the $default_folder_prefix from 'INBOX.' (to which it defaulted on my installation) to '' would then open up the file permission based shared folders from my Courier-IMAP server. J John wrote: I am in the process of configuring a new email system for a small outlet of three workstations, one server and two users. How can I persuade SquirrelMail to show my file permission based shared folders from my Courier-IMAP server? I've checked the posting archives and found Denis Jacobi's discussion re virtual folders but in his post at 'http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user/28000/match=courier+imap+shared+permission' he make the comment 'Don't know if it works with file permission based shared folders'. Having tried his amended imap-mailbox.php in my configuration, I find that it does not and now seek guidance on the necessary steps to rectify this, since both my Nokia mobile and Mozilla Thunderbird (albeit unreliably) both do work with this configuration. Many Thanks, in advance John --- All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users --- All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Behavior upon deletion of message
Richard Klein wrote: > Is it possible to configure SquirrelMail to advance to the next message > when you delete the current message instead of returning to the message > list? > > -- Rich > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > -- > squirrelmail-users mailing list > Posting Guidelines: > http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines > List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List Archives: > http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user > List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 > List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users > Try the 'delete_move_next' plug-in! J Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Behavior upon deletion of message
Richard Klein wrote: > John wrote: >> Richard Klein wrote: >>> Is it possible to configure SquirrelMail to advance to the next >>> message when you delete the current message instead of returning to >>> the message list? >>> >> Try the 'delete_move_next' plug-in! > > That would do the job, but it's in the Obsolete category and says > "Added to SM 1.2 Core Plugins". I'm running SM 1.4.4. Any idea how > to find that functionality that has supposedly been integrated into SM? > > -- Rich If it's in the core plug-ins, it should list when you run conf.pl to configure squirrelmail. It's a while since I went down the route myself but try ./conf.pl from the squirrel config, select option 8 to select plugins and look in the list of availables for delete_move_next. HTH J Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] Address books
Can anyone point me to a method for exporting an address book from Thunderbird to Squirrelmail, please? Many Thanks John - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] SOLVED Re: Address books
Tomas Kuliavas wrote: >> Can anyone point me to a method for exporting an address book from >> Thunderbird to Squirrelmail, please? >> > > ThunderBird can export address books to .ldif, .csv or .tab. SquirrelMail > can import ldif (http://www.squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=18) or csv > (http://www.squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=29). Theoretically .tab > can be imported too, but abook_import_export plugin does not provide such > delimiter option. > > Thanks, Tomas. Having seen that an indirect approach might be the way (ldif or csv), I had hoped that I had missed a direct alternative. Seems not. Many Thanks J - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] Administrator 'Rights'
I run a small server system (had as many as three users once!) but I respect privacy. However, the situation has arisen whereby I need to read another's mail but without altering their password, which I do not know. My system is currently on SuSE10.0, but mail is handled by postfix + Courier IMAP + Squirrelmail + Thunderbird. Is there any way I can read someone else's mail within my system for their benefit whilst they are hospitalized? TIA John - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] Re: Sentmail doesn't arrive
> > Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:14:24 -0500 (CDT) > From: John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SM-USERS] Sentmail doesn't arrive > > Hi, > I'm running Mandrake 9.1 with Postfix and Imap (uw?) both came which both > came with the original distribution. I've installed Pine on the system and > CAN send and receive mail fine. > I've installed SquirrelMail 1.4.0 on this system but have not been able > to send out any mail using SquirrelMail, either to the same network or > outside. (I can read the inbox mail fine). There is no error but the mail > seems to have disappeared somewhere...it never arrives to destination > after being sent out. Where do you think I should look into as the cause > of the > problem? I just wanna say that I got this problem solved by installing php-ini-4.3.0-1mdk. Mandrake9.1 has the php.ini file provided by a seperate package and therefore no /etc/php.ini to be modified in the first place (a similar question in the FAQ but assumed that this file is there) if you installed PHP during Mandrake installation. Thanks to Robin Bowes for the help. John --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] Re: How to stay in https after logged in
Hi, The secure login plugin allows me to log on via https automatically. How/what do I need to configure to make it stay in https even after logging in? Thanks John --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] problem when emil is from outlock
Hello, i am new in this mailling list. I use squirremail stable version 1.4 and i have problem wiht recived email. When email is send from windows outlock the email is not to be seened to message body. Only blank is seen and email is attached in blank with name Untitled-1. Any body know how to fix this problem ? Regards, John --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] problem when emil is from outlock
> John said: >> Hello, >> i am new in this mailling list. I use squirremail stable version 1.4 >> and > i >> have problem wiht recived email. When email is send from windows >> outlock > the email is not to be seened to message body. Only blank is seen and > email is attached in blank with name Untitled-1. >> Any body know how to fix this problem ? > > Outlook sends HTML email by default, with a blank text section in the > message. You have to go into Options -> Display Preferences and set 'Show > HTML Version by Default' to 'Yes' to 'fix' this behavior. Either that, or > educate the Outlook users on the evil of HTML email. > >> >> >> Regards, >> John >> >> Thanks, i make this changes and now may be work fine, how i now turn this option to every user who use my webmail by default that turn on ? Btw now link: Show Full Header is work fine, when option: Show HTML Vers... is No and if you click in link show full header shi is empty (no header print). Regards, John --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] SquirrelMail 1.4.2 change login page
Hello, any body can say me what changes i must make to i can use squirrelmail with virtual domains. I don't want to use vlogin plugin. I want to use method like http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/UserContribs but files marked as Unlinked. Regards, John --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail 1.4.2 change login page
>> any body can say me what changes i must make to >> i can use squirrelmail with virtual domains. I don't want to use vlogin >> plugin. I want to use method like >> http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/UserContribs >> but files marked as Unlinked. > > A quick browse of that page didn't turn up any virtual domain > information. Please include it in your post next time. > > Vlogin is the best way to accomplish what you want; otherwise, please > state what "changes" you are actually wanting to make, since you give no > information at all > > - Paul > Unlinked -> http://www.squirrelmail.org/contrib/login.php.text - Currently .php.text files get parsed, so it's impossible to use this file and the one below :( -> http://www.squirrelmail.org/contrib/redirect.php.text http://www.squirrelmail.org/contrib/smcss-trim.tar.gz http://www.squirrelmail.org/contrib/smcss.tar.gz http://www.squirrelmail.org Two files that i need login.php.text and redirect.php.text I want to use this screen to log in http://www.squirrelmail.org/contrib/login.php.text i see and test vlogin but this is not that i need. I write email to autor Dan Caescu but no answer. I make changes in login.php but i don't know what chages i must make in redirect.php that when i write in login.php username john and select domain vcable.net automatic my email and domain say [EMAIL PROTECTED] and domain vcable.net from outgoings email. I have email server with some virtualdomains in sigle ip that i point to MX of my server. Now in login page i must write my full email to log in like: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] and so on I want to user select domain name from login page. Regards, John --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] Re: [SM-USERS] Re: [SM-USERS]В Re: В [SM-USERS]В SquirrelMailВ 1. =?windows-1251?Q? [SM-USE RS] SquirrelMail 1.4.2 =A0change=A0login=A0page?=
>>>Tomas Kuliavas wrote: >>> >>>>** redirect.php -- derived from webmail.php by Ralf Kraudelt >>>>** $Id: redirect.php,v 1.18 2001/05/15 19:11:58 fidian Exp $ >>> >>>Like I said, the file is likely to be out of date. It's almost 3 years >>>old. It most likely will not work for you. It also relies on >>>autoglobalization of POST variables, which should not be the case. I >>>suggest doing this 'the right way'. >> >> I know php and i added in my squirrelmail login page: >> http://email.ixip.net >> I just is not be sure where i must add line: >> $login_username = $login_username."@".$mailserv; >> but i see attached files and i added and work succesful. > > Those files are three years old. They might "work", but those files > have changed extensively in that time. You are surely missing important > code that might cause bugs that you'll find in the future possibly > having to do with sessions, javascript auto-detect, security, etc. And > by going that route instead of using a plugin, you at some point might > lose the ability to upgrade SM completely. But it's your choice... > > - Paul > > I will use these chages and wait to next release of SM to be ported in stable distribution. Regards, John --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] Bug found in SM 1.4.2
Hello all, Jonathan Angliss send me email and tell me that i have problem with email headers. Sorry that i write in mailing list, but i unable to send reply because: Apr 28 12:34:02 ns qmail: 1083144842.598904 delivery 876: deferral: 213.236.166.154_does_not_like_recipient./Remote_host_said :_450_<[EMAIL PROTECTED], removed by me>:_Recipient_address_rejected:_Greylisting_active._Please_try_again_in_60_seconds./Giving_up_on_21 3.236.166.154./ > Hi John, > > The mailing list has received several bounce messages regarding > invalid headers. On investigation, they were caused by your email and > a bad received line. Here is the line: > > Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by ns by uid 99 with qmail-scanner-1.21 > (clamdscan: 0.70. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. > Processed in 0.044786 secs); 27 ai? 2004 23:02:10 - > > Notice the odd characters after the 27... These are invalid characters > for the header according to the RFCs. Please correct the issue, or > contact whoever is responsible for your mail setup, and let them know > of the issue. > > -- > Jonathan Angliss > (xxx) > > This is bug of SQ web mail. I from Bulgaria and when i switch to english language now header is fine: Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by ns by uid 99 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (clamdscan: 0.70. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.047303 secs); 28 Apr 2004 09:30:55 - when i switch to use my born language header is: Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by ns by uid 99 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (clamdscan: 0.70. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.044786 secs); 27 ai? 2004 23:02:10 - Regards, Condor --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Bug found in SM 1.4.2
>> Hello all, >> >> Jonathan Angliss send me email and tell me that i have problem with >> email >> headers. Sorry that i write in mailing list, but i unable to send reply >> because: > >> This is bug of SQ web mail. >> I from Bulgaria and when i switch to english language now header is >> fine: > > I think this is not SquirrelMail or SQWebmail bug. This header is inserted > by email scanning software of your smtp server. Your server's system > default locale is not English and qmail-scanner inserts date in different > language. If you take a look at my email headers, you will see dates in > English and not in my native language. > > You should contact qmail-scanner developers. http://qmail-scanner.sf.net. > > Please don't confuse SquirrelMail with SQWebmail. You can see a difference > between tractor and vw beetle, right? :) > > P.S. http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html > When You Ask > * Choose your forum carefully > * Don't claim that you have found a bug > > -- > Tomas > My server, scanner .. all services in my server are configure to english! No any different language, only SM is in Bulgarian language, and when i switch to english my SM web mail header is fine, but when my SM mail is in Bu;garian language, have a problem with header, so i think that the problem is in SM web mail. Regards, Condor --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Bug found in SM 1.4.2
>> My server, scanner .. all services in my server are configure to
>> english!
>> No any different language, only SM is in Bulgarian language, and when i
>> switch to english my SM web mail header is fine, but when my SM mail is
>> in
>> Bu;garian language, have a problem with header, so i think that the
>> problem is in SM web mail.
>
> any details about your setup?
>
> you are using SMTP or /usr/sbin/sendmail to send emails?
>
> If you use /usr/sbin/sendmail or /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject to send
> emails, do you have QMAILQUEUE variable set in your system environment?
>
> If you use SMTP to send emails, provide smtp server startup script and
> printout of environment variables used by smtp server and qmail-scanner.
>
> what language is set in qmail-scanner's configure script?
>
> your os, webserver, php version?
>
> output of if possible.
>
> output of 'locale' command.
>
> It is not squirrelmail problem, if you don't prove that header
>
> Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by ns by uid 99 with qmail-scanner-1.21
> (clamdscan: 0.70. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):.
> Processed in 0.044786 secs); 27 апр 2004 23:02:10 -
>
> is added by SquirrelMail. It is very hard to prove such thing, because
> header is added by qmail-scanner.
>
> --
> Tomas
>
>
1. Domain : vcable.net
2. Invert Time: false
3. Sendmail or SMTP : Sendmail
->locale
LANG=C
LC_CTYPE="C"
LC_NUMERIC="C"
LC_TIME="C"
LC_COLLATE="C"
LC_MONETARY="C"
LC_MESSAGES="C"
LC_PAPER="C"
LC_NAME="C"
LC_ADDRESS="C"
LC_TELEPHONE="C"
LC_MEASUREMENT="C"
LC_IDENTIFICATION="C"
LC_ALL="C"
header send by console:
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by ns by uid 0 with qmail-scanner-1.22
(clamdscan: 0.70. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):.
Processed in 0.020194 secs); 28 Apr 2004 18:01:56 -
header send by SM web mail:
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by ns by uid 99 with qmail-scanner-1.22
(clamdscan: 0.70. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):.
Processed in 0.023569 secs); 28 апр 2004 17:51:11 -
->more /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue
--- cut ---
my $orig_locale='C';
$ENV{'LC_ALL'} = 'C';
--- cut ---
i use direct replace of qmail-queue to qmail-queue.real
and use qmail-scanner.pl to qmail-queue. I don't use QMAILQUEUE
because i don't want, with this configuration i not need QMAILQUEUE env
patch.
-> Why i don't have problem when my SM webmail is in english language,
only when is in Bulgarian language ?
OS = Slackware 9.0
Server = Apache 1.3.29
PHP = 4.3.6
phpinfo output -> http://email.ixip.net/is.php
I never, never configure my server to use for default locale or default
program language Bulgarian and any another languages, only english!
I think that may be, may be SM send date with cyrillic charset and
qmail-scanner give this date and just added to header, but i not sure.
Regards,
John
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Bug found in SM 1.4.2
> John said:
>>> Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by ns by uid 99 with qmail-scanner-1.21
>>> (clamdscan: 0.70. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):.
>>> Processed in 0.044786 secs); 27 апр 2004 23:02:10 -
>>>
>
>
> This is how the date is created in our added Received line:
>
>/* This creates an RFC 822 date */
>$date = date('D, j M Y H:i:s ', mktime()) . $this->timezone();
>
> And this is how the Received header is build:
>
>$header[] = "Received: from $received_from" . $rn;
>$header[] = "(SquirrelMail authenticated user $username);" .
>$header[] = "by $SERVER_NAME with HTTP;" . $rn;
>$header[] = "$date" . $rn;
>
> As you see we do not create int date formats so the problem isn't
> SquirrelMail.
>
> A date in a local format is creatd with setlocale and strftime and we do
> not use them.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Marc Groot Koerkamp.
>
>
>
>
See ->
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by ns by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22
(clamdscan: 0.70. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:0(206.190.38.70):.
Processed in 0.122493 secs); 28 Apr 2004 19:02:26 -
This email is recived from yahoo, send by me and data is normal, email has
been scanned from qmail-scanner and does not contain any cyrillyc symbols.
I will repeat my question:
Why when i change my langage to english email header format is fine, but
when i chage my language in SquirrelMail to Bulgarian header contain
cyrillyc symbols. I not change anything in server configuration only in
SquirrelMail.
.. Nevermind, i don't care, emails are accepted from all servers so the
problem is not big.
Don't discus this problem any more.
Regards,
John
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] Problem when replay in SM 1.4.2
I have problem when i click in Replay or Replay to All. I bottom page i see: Warning: session_register(): Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /path/data/functions/page_header.php:29) in /path/data/functions/global.php on line 129 Warning: session_register(): Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /path/data/functions/page_header.php:29) in /path/data/functions/global.php on line 129 How i fix this problem ? Regards, John --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] Want to change login page
Hello all,
after a long time i write to mailling list that i want to change my own
login page.
I see that i need to add 3-4 lines in login.php but every time when i
added it i recive error.
What i trying to make:
First define array $domains
$domains = ("first.net","second.net","other.com");
After this i add these lines:
html_tag( 'tr',
html_tag( 'td',
addSelect( "mailserv",$domains, "-1", TRUE))) . "\n" .
html_tag( 'tr',
without last line etc.
in file redirect.php i added line:
$login_username = $login_username."@".$mailserv;
Every time i recive error, i see sorce code of sq for help how to use
AddSelect but unable to understad.
Do any body can help me to add this in lofin.php to user can select in
what domain to logging in.
Regards,
Condor
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Want to change login page
>> Hello all,
>> after a long time i write to mailling list that i want to change my own
>> login page.
>> I see that i need to add 3-4 lines in login.php but every time when i
>> added it i recive error.
>> What i trying to make:
>>
>> First define array $domains
>> $domains = ("first.net","second.net","other.com");
>> After this i add these lines:
>> html_tag( 'tr',
>>html_tag( 'td',
>> addSelect( "mailserv",$domains, "-1", TRUE))) . "\n" .
>>html_tag( 'tr',
>> without last line etc.
>> in file redirect.php i added line:
>> $login_username = $login_username."@".$mailserv;
>>
>> Every time i recive error, i see sorce code of sq for help how to use
>> AddSelect but unable to understad.
>> Do any body can help me to add this in lofin.php to user can select in
>> what domain to logging in.
>
> If you have added only one line into redirect.php, $mailserv variable is
> not extracted from POST variables.
>
> addSelect function is part of squirrelmail functions/forms.php. It is
> included only in 1.4.3cvs and 1.5.1cvs. Some comments that explain usage
> of this function are included in that file. Why are you using negative
> number in order to set default value? Your array data does not have such
> key.
>
> arrays are created with $name=array(some..array..data). without it your
> code can't be parsed.
>
> --
> Tomas
>
>
I change $domains to $domains = array .. and now it's show in index page
but have i litte problem :(
The value in variable $mailserv is in numerc etc. first.com value="0"
but i need value in page to be domain name etc first.com value="fisrt.com"
How i change this ?
Regards,
Condor
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] SquirrelMail 1.4.3 bug when replay and replay to all
Hello, i download new version from www.squirrelmail.org and installed. But when trying to replay i see error: Unable to allocate memory... Any body have idea how to fix this ? Regards, Condor --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] Suggestion about www.squirrelmail.org
Hello, i think that is a good idea to have in official site link after download menu -> Patches that is release patches on stable version only. Because most people does not want to use CVS version (like me, i don't trust in current version, because is not marked as stable and every day have updates, i don't have time to update every day and if new cvs does not work ? back reverse) Regards, Condor --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. >From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] SM not keeping password
I get "Unknown user or password incorrect." when I try to logon. What I am seeing in my log files is that squirrelmail is not remembering the password. Here's part of my log file. -- 20:45:19.640: Connection from 127.0.0.1, Thu Jun 24 20:45:19 2004 20:45:19.656: << * OK thetethered.com IMAP4rev1 Mercury/32 v4.01a server ready. 20:45:19.671: >> A001 LOGIN "test" "*" 20:45:19.703: << A001 OK LOGIN completed. 20:45:19.703: >> A002 CAPABILITY 20:45:19.718: << * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 X-MERCURY 20:45:19.734: << A002 OK CAPABILITY complete. 20:45:19.734: >> . LIST "INBOX" "" 20:45:19.750: << * LIST (\Noselect) "/" "" 20:45:19.765: << . OK LIST completed. 20:45:19.765: >> A003 LOGOUT 20:45:19.796: << * BYE IMAP4rev1 server terminating connection. 20:45:19.812: << A003 OK LOGOUT completed. 20:45:19.828: --- Connection closed normally at Thu Jun 24 20:45:19 2004. --- 20:45:19.843: 20:45:21.343: Connection from 127.0.0.1, Thu Jun 24 20:45:21 2004 20:45:21.359: << * OK thetethered.com IMAP4rev1 Mercury/32 v4.01a server ready. 20:45:21.375: >> A001 LOGIN "test" "" 20:45:21.406: << A001 NO Username or password incorrect. 20:45:21.468: --- Connection closed normally at Thu Jun 24 20:45:21 2004. --- 20:45:21.484: 20:45:21.718: Connection from 127.0.0.1, Thu Jun 24 20:45:21 2004 20:45:21.734: << * OK thetethered.com IMAP4rev1 Mercury/32 v4.01a server ready. 20:45:21.750: >> A001 LOGIN "test" "" 20:45:21.765: << A001 NO Username or password incorrect. 20:45:21.843: --- Connection closed normally at Thu Jun 24 20:45:21 2004. --- 20:45:21.859: -- I'm trying to setup SM version 1.4.3a. Any ideas on what is going wrong? Thanks --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
RE: [SM-USERS] SM not keeping password
Thanks, I've been looking at that. I am using Firefox and it does show a single cookie being sent with the content being the session ID. If I delete the cookie and try to log on I get "You must be logged in to access this page." If I try a second time without deleting the cookie I get "Unknown user or password incorrect." In Firefox I have my site under the exceptions list to allow. I have three different versions of SM (1.4.2, 1.4.3a, and 1.5.0) running and they all have the same results. 1.5.0 has a config test page and it reports "Congratulations, your SquirrelMail setup looks fine to me!" I think it is a problem in the session or cookies but I don't know where. This is my PHP.ini session settings [Session] session.save_handler = files session.save_path = C:\PHP\session session.use_cookies = 1 session.use_only_cookies = 0 ;session.name = PHPSESSID session.auto_start = 0 session.cookie_lifetime = 1800 ; 30 minutes session.cookie_path = / ;session.cookie_domain = session.serialize_handler = php session.gc_probability = 1 session.gc_divisor = 1000 session.gc_maxlifetime = 1440 session.bug_compat_42 = 0 session.bug_compat_warn = 1 session.referer_check = session.entropy_length = 0 session.entropy_file = ;session.entropy_length = 16 ;session.entropy_file = /dev/urandom ;session.cache_limiter = nocache session.cache_expire = 180 session.use_trans_sid = 0 url_rewriter.tags = "a=href,area=href,frame=src,input=src,form=fakeentry" I have this running on IIS 5.0 (W2K SP4), PHP 4.3.3, Mercury/32 4.01a Any known issues? I have this tried on PHP 4.2.2 and 4.2.3 with the same results. Any help with what I have wrong? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonathan Angliss Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 2:34 AM To: John Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] SM not keeping password Hello John, On Saturday, June 26, 2004, John wrote... > I get "Unknown user or password incorrect." when I try to logon. > What I am seeing in my log files is that squirrelmail is not > remembering the password. Here's part of my log file. > -- > 20:45:19.640: Connection from 127.0.0.1, Thu Jun 24 20:45:19 2004 > 20:45:19.656: << * OK thetethered.com IMAP4rev1 Mercury/32 v4.01a server > ready. 20:45:19.671: >>> A001 LOGIN "test" "*" > 20:45:19.703: << A001 OK LOGIN completed. 20:45:19.703: >>> A002 CAPABILITY > 20:45:19.718: << * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 X-MERCURY > 20:45:19.734: << A002 OK CAPABILITY complete. 20:45:19.734: >>> . LIST "INBOX" "" > 20:45:19.750: << * LIST (\Noselect) "/" "" > 20:45:19.765: << . OK LIST completed. 20:45:19.765: >>> A003 LOGOUT > 20:45:19.796: << * BYE IMAP4rev1 server terminating connection. > 20:45:19.812: << A003 OK LOGOUT completed. > 20:45:19.828: --- Connection closed normally at Thu Jun 24 20:45:19 > 2004. --- > 20:45:19.843: > 20:45:21.343: Connection from 127.0.0.1, Thu Jun 24 20:45:21 2004 > 20:45:21.359: << * OK thetethered.com IMAP4rev1 Mercury/32 v4.01a server > ready. 20:45:21.375: >>> A001 LOGIN "test" "" > 20:45:21.406: << A001 NO Username or password incorrect. This is usually caused by cookies not being set for the password. I suggest checking to make sure your browser is accepting cookies correctly. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Posting Hints: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/en_US/MailingListPostingGuidelines --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
RE: [SM-USERS] SM not keeping password
HI,
Yes the path does exist and I can see the sessions as files.
I am using PHP.exe and the dll's are getting loaded.
Can you help me with this?
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=542724&group_id=311
&atid=100311
Fix:
src/redirect.php
< header("Location: $redirect_url");
>
echo "<html><head><META HTTP-EQUIV=\"Refresh\"
CONTENT=\"0;
URL=$redirect_url\"></head><body><a
href=$redirect_url>Enter</a></body></html>";
Am I replacing something? Or just adding this bit in? If so, where?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Jonathan Angliss
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 12:52 PM
To: John
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] SM not keeping password
Hello John,
On Sunday, June 27, 2004, John wrote...
> Thanks,
> I've been looking at that. I am using Firefox and it does show a single
> cookie being sent with the content being the session ID.
> If I delete the cookie and try to log on I get "You must be logged in to
> access this page." If I try a second time without deleting the cookie
> I get "Unknown user or password incorrect."
> In Firefox I have my site under the exceptions list to allow. I have three
> different versions of SM (1.4.2, 1.4.3a, and 1.5.0) running and they all
> have the same results. 1.5.0 has a config test page and it reports
> "Congratulations, your SquirrelMail setup looks fine to me!" I think it
> is a problem in the session or cookies but I don't know where.
> This is my PHP.ini session settings
> [Session]
> session.save_handler = files
> session.save_path = C:\PHP\session
[..]
Does this directory exist? Have you tried using / instead of \? As a
note, did you read the document on IIS on the SM website?
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/en_US/InstallingSquirrelMailWindowsIIS
Search for the word refresh, and read the docs around that section,
though it wouldn't hurt to read the whole page ;)
--
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Posting Hints:
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/en_US/MailingListPostingGuidelines
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
RE: [SM-USERS] SM not keeping password
Jonathan,
Thank you for your help.
I seen the patch I needed after I sent the email.
I just needed this bit
"I also replaced the 'header("Location: $redirect_url");' in
src/redirect.php with the line 'echo "Enter";'."
FYI
I am using IIS 5.0, PHP 4.3.3, and SM 1.5.0.
Everything seems to be working great.
The calendar function that doesn't work for me in 1.4.2 now works.
One more thing, are there any PHP.ini settings that I should worry about?
Security, Stability? etc..
Thanks again
John
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Angliss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 5:18 PM
To: John
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] SM not keeping password
Hello John,
On Sunday, June 27, 2004, John wrote...
> HI,
> Yes the path does exist and I can see the sessions as files.
> I am using PHP.exe and the dll's are getting loaded.
> Can you help me with this?
>
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=542724&group_id=311
> &atid=100311
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/en_US/InstallingSquirrelMailWindowsIIS
Did you read this link I'd pasted? It tells you the right way.
Unfortunately SF.net screwed up at one point with filtering text, and
it broke a lot of the stuff. Read the above link, and follow the
instructions.
--
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Posting Hints:
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/en_US/MailingListPostingGuidelines
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] Could not create hashed directory structure error message
Hello, We recently moved our web site over to an IIS6 setup. One of my jobs was to set up squirrelmail on the new system. All seemed to go well with the install until we started to use SM. After the initial logon screen I get the message Error creating directory \prefs/3.Could not create hashed directory structure!Please contact your system administrator and report this error. In my config.php file the area that talks about the prefs and data directory is as follows $data_dir = "\prefs"; $attachment_dir = "\attach"; I have read through some of the similar topic found on the web page and have tried some of the solutions but none of them seemed to work in this case. I have given the IUSR_ user full access to the directories just in case but this also seemed to have little affect. As mentioned earlier, the sendmail has been setup on an IIS6 machine and attaches to an AIX machine which runs sendmail. One thing that I am a little uncertain about is where the SM is trying to look for the directorys, on IIS or the AIX box. Any help that can be supplied would be much appreciated. John.
[SM-USERS] Squirrel mail works, but I don't understand why...
I have a little FC2 server. on that server are sendmail+dovecot+squirrelmail. somehow I got them running from behind a dsl modem + router with dyndns. I know that I configured sendmail and dovecot to run as daemons so I'm not totally surprised they actually work. I don't understand how http:///webmail fires up squirrel mail. There is no webmail directory under /var/www/html/. There is no change to httpd.conf, and I didn't restart the webserver. I ran conf.pl for squirrelmail but for some reason, my input was not echoed to the kconsole terminal, so I didn't complete the configuration. I was assuming it was not working and idly tried http:///webmail and was flabbergasted to see it working. How? Can somebody tell me how the above url gets routed to src/login.php? thanks. I'm feeling a little twilight-zoned. I am a programmer with long unix experience, although new to administration of my own personal little linux server, so straightforward technical explanation will be fine. --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almosthttp://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] Squirrelmail on perdition
I have to login twice after each logout using squirrelmail located on the
same server as perdition. The mail stores are on two other servers.
I am left with this on squirrelmail after first aatempt:
SquirrelMail version 1.4.8-5.el5.centos.10
By the SquirrelMail Project Team
ERROR
Your session has expired, but will be resumed after logging in again.
Go to the login page
Here is my logfile:
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: version=1.18, add_domain="",
authenticate_in=off, authenticate_timeout=1800, bind_address="",
capability="IMAP4 IMAP4REV1", client_server_specification=off,
config_file="/usr/local/etc/perdition/perdition.imap4.conf",
connection_limit=0, connection_logging=on, connect_relog=300, debug=on,
domain_delimiter="@", explicit_domain="", group="users", inetd_mode=on,
listen_port="143", log_facility="mail", log_passwd="always",
login_disabled=off, lower_case="",
map_library="/usr/local/lib/libperditiondb_mysql.so.0",
map_library_opt="localhost:3306:dbPerdition:tblPerdition:perdition:mypasswd",
no_bind_banner=off, no_daemon=off, no_lookup=off,
nodename="perdi.server.com", ok_line="You are so in", outgoing_port="143",
outgoing_server="", pid_file="/usr/local/var/run/perdition.imap4",
protocol="IMAP4", server_resp_line=on, strip_domain="", timeout=1800,
username="nobody", username_from_database=off, query_key="", quiet=off,
ssl_mode="", ssl_ca_file="", ssl_ca_path="/usr/local/etc
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: vanessa_socket_daemon_setid: uid=99
euid=99 gid=100 egid=100
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: Connect: 127.0.0.1->127.0.0.1
inetd_pid=3515
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: SELF: "* OK IMAP4 Ready
perdi.mydomain.com 0001f9c7\r\n"
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: CLIENT: "A001 LOGIN \"john\"
\"myPass\"\r\n"
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: username_add_domain:
username_add_domain 0 1
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: username_add_domain:
username_add_domain 0 4
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: REAL: "* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4REV1
I18NLEVEL=1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS STARTTLS] thor.tconl.com
IMAP4rev1 2007e.404 at Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:31:34 -0600 (CST)\r\n"
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: SELF: "flim07 CAPABILITY\r\n"
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: REAL: "* CAPABILITY IMAP4REV1
I18NLEVEL=1 LITERAL+ IDLE UIDPLUS NAMESPACE CHILDREN MAILBOX-REFERRALS
BINARY UNSELECT ESEARCH WITHIN SCAN SORT THREAD=REFERENCES
THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS
STARTTLS\r\nflim07 OK CAPABILITY completed\r\n"
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: SELF: "flim08 LOGIN {4}\r\n"
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: REAL: "+ Ready for argument\r\n"
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: SELF: "john {8}\r\n"
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: REAL: "+ Ready for argument\r\n"
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: SELF: "myPass\r\n"
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: REAL: "flim08 OK [CAPABILITY
IMAP4REV1 I18NLEVEL=1 LITERAL+ IDLE UIDPLUS NAMESPACE CHILDREN
MAILBOX-REFERRALS BINARY UNSELECT ESEARCH WITHIN SCAN SORT
THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND] User john
authenticated\r\n"
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: SELF: "A001 OK [CAPABILITY
IMAP4REV1 I18NLEVEL=1 LITERAL+ IDLE UIDPLUS NAMESPACE CHILDREN
MAILBOX-REFERRALS BINARY UNSELECT ESEARCH WITHIN SCAN SORT
THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND] User john
authenticated\r\n"
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: Auth: 127.0.0.1->127.0.0.1
user="john" passwd="myPass" server="perdi.mydomain.com" port="143"
status="ok"
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: CLIENT: "A002 CAPABILITY\r\n"
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: REAL: "* CAPABILITY IMAP4REV1
I18NLEVEL=1 LITERAL+ IDLE UIDPLUS NAMESPACE CHILDREN MAILBOX-REFERRALS
BINARY UNSELECT ESEARCH WITHIN SCAN SORT THREAD=REFERENCES
THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS STARTTLS\r\nA002
OK CAPABILITY completed\r\n"
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: CLIENT: "A003 NAMESPACE\r\n"
Nov 12 12:31:22 perdi perdition[3994]: REAL: "* NAMESPACE ((\"\"
\"/\")(\"#mhinbox\" NIL)(\"#mh/\" \"/\")) ((\"~\" \"/\")) ((\"#shared/\"
\"/\")(\"#ftp/\" \"/\")(\"#news.\" \".\")(\"#public/\" \"/\"))\r\nA003 OK
NAMESPACE completed\r\n"
Nov 12 12:31:22 per
Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail on perdition
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:23 AM, wrote: >> I have to login twice after each logout using squirrelmail located on >> the > > What does this mean? Please explain yourself better. Explain *each* > click and input and each reaction from the server for those actions. > I logout of squirrelmail...and return to the login (or it is a new day and I attempt to login). I pass my credentials and receive this: "ERROR Your session has expired, but will be resumed after logging in again. Go to the login page" Every first attempt at login. My second attempt is always successful. >> same server as perdition. The mail stores are on two other servers. > > So then have you inquired with the Perdition community? I'm not sure > you included enough log info. You should also be watching the web > server log, etc. > I have also passed this to the perdition community. Below are http access logs on the proxy/squirrelmail server and the imap server split IAW login failure then success: Proxy http Fail-- 10.2.0.12 - - [16/Nov/2010:08:45:41 -0600] "GET /webmail/ HTTP/1.1" 302 - "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100908 CentOS/3.6-2.el5.centos Firefox/3.6.9" 10.2.0.12 - - [16/Nov/2010:08:45:41 -0600] "GET /webmail/src/login.php HTTP/1.1" 200 2370 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100908 CentOS/3.6-2.el5.centos Firefox/3.6.9" 10.2.0.12 - - [16/Nov/2010:08:45:47 -0600] "POST /webmail/src/redirect.php HTTP/1.1" 302 - "http://10.3.0.13/webmail/src/login.php"; "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100908 CentOS/3.6-2.el5.centos Firefox/3.6.9" 10.2.0.12 - - [16/Nov/2010:08:45:47 -0600] "GET /webmail/src/webmail.php HTTP/1.1" 200 1271 "http://10.3.0.13/webmail/src/login.php"; "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100908 CentOS/3.6-2.el5.centos Firefox/3.6.9" Proxy http Success-- 10.2.0.12 - - [16/Nov/2010:08:46:34 -0600] "GET /webmail/src/login.php HTTP/1.1" 200 2370 "http://10.3.0.13/webmail/src/webmail.php"; "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100908 CentOS/3.6-2.el5.centos Firefox/3.6.9" 10.2.0.12 - - [16/Nov/2010:08:46:38 -0600] "POST /webmail/src/redirect.php HTTP/1.1" 302 - "http://10.3.0.13/webmail/src/login.php"; "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100908 CentOS/3.6-2.el5.centos Firefox/3.6.9" 10.2.0.12 - - [16/Nov/2010:08:46:38 -0600] "GET /webmail/src/webmail.php HTTP/1.1" 200 343 "http://10.3.0.13/webmail/src/login.php"; "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100908 CentOS/3.6-2.el5.centos Firefox/3.6.9" 10.2.0.12 - - [16/Nov/2010:08:46:39 -0600] "GET /webmail/src/left_main.php HTTP/1.1" 200 2838 "http://10.3.0.13/webmail/src/webmail.php"; "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100908 CentOS/3.6-2.el5.centos Firefox/3.6.9" 10.2.0.12 - - [16/Nov/2010:08:46:39 -0600] "GET /webmail/src/right_main.php HTTP/1.1" 200 17146 "http://10.3.0.13/webmail/src/webmail.php"; "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100908 CentOS/3.6-2.el5.centos Firefox/3.6.9" IMAP fail-- Nov 16 08:46:00 thor imapd[7950]: imap service init from 10.3.0.13 Nov 16 08:46:00 thor imapd[7950]: Login user=john host=[10.3.0.13] Nov 16 08:46:00 thor imapd[7950]: Logout user=john host=[10.3.0.13] IMAP success-- Nov 16 08:46:52 thor imapd[7959]: imap service init from 10.3.0.13 Nov 16 08:46:52 thor imapd[7959]: Login user=john host=[10.3.0.13] Nov 16 08:46:52 thor imapd[7959]: Logout user=john host=[10.3.0.13] Nov 16 08:46:52 thor imapd[7960]: imap service init from 10.3.0.13 Nov 16 08:46:52 thor imapd[7960]: Login user=john host=[10.3.0.13] Nov 16 08:46:52 thor imapd[7961]: imap service init from 10.3.0.13 Nov 16 08:46:52 thor imapd[7961]: Login user=john host=[10.3.0.13] Nov 16 08:46:52 thor imapd[7961]: Logout user=john host=[10.3.0.13] Nov 16 08:46:52 thor imapd[7960]: Logout user=john host=[10.3.0.13] Nov 16 08:46:52 thor imapd[7962]: imap service init from 10.3.0.13 Nov 16 08:46:52 thor imapd[7962]: Login user=john host=[10.3.0.13] Nov 16 08:46:52 thor imapd[7962]: Logout user=john host=[10.3.0.13] >> I am left with this on squirrelmail after first aatempt: >> >> SquirrelMail version 1.4.8-5.el5.centos.10 > > This version is not maintained by us. Unless the issue is clearly a > problem in our newest release, you'll need to contact CentOS/RedHat. > > The issue to me sounds suspiciously like a proxy (Perdition) issue. > Have you tried logging in from the command line to see whether or not > SquirrelM
Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail on perdition
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:58 AM, wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:23 AM, wrote: >>>> I have to login twice after each logout using squirrelmail located on >>>> the >>> >>> What does this mean? Please explain yourself better. Explain *each* >>> click and input and each reaction from the server for those actions. >>> >> I logout of squirrelmail...and return to the login (or it is a new day >> and >> I attempt to login). > > When I ask you to explain EVERY step, I really mean it. HOW did you > log out? What page were you on when you logged out? Did you close > the browser between sessions? How did you arrive back at the login > page, etc.? What plugins are installed? Have you patched the source > at all? EVERY detail, please. > >> I pass my credentials and receive this: >> >> "ERROR >> Your session has expired, but will be resumed after logging in again. >> Go to the login page" > > The message is only generated when you had been trying to access the > compose page on an expired session. Please explain how the compose > page is part of your process. > >> Every first attempt at login. My second attempt is always successful. > > More details. More details. What does the FULL address in the > browser say when the error occurs? When login is successful? > >>>> same server as perdition. The mail stores are on two other servers. >>> >>> So then have you inquired with the Perdition community? I'm not sure >>> you included enough log info. You should also be watching the web >>> server log, etc. >>> >> I have also passed this to the perdition community. >> >> Below are http access logs on the proxy/squirrelmail server and the imap >> server split IAW login failure then success: >> Proxy http Fail-- > > What do you mean "proxy" http? Are you using a proxy server for your > web server too? Please give full details about this. Please test > without it as well. > >> 10.2.0.12 - - [16/Nov/2010:08:45:41 -0600] "GET /webmail/ HTTP/1.1" 302 >> - >> "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100908 >> CentOS/3.6-2.el5.centos Firefox/3.6.9" >> 10.2.0.12 - - [16/Nov/2010:08:45:41 -0600] "GET /webmail/src/login.php >> HTTP/1.1" 200 2370 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; >> rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100908 CentOS/3.6-2.el5.centos Firefox/3.6.9" >> 10.2.0.12 - - [16/Nov/2010:08:45:47 -0600] "POST >> /webmail/src/redirect.php >> HTTP/1.1" 302 - "http://10.3.0.13/webmail/src/login.php"; "Mozilla/5.0 >> (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100908 >> CentOS/3.6-2.el5.centos Firefox/3.6.9" >> 10.2.0.12 - - [16/Nov/2010:08:45:47 -0600] "GET /webmail/src/webmail.php >> HTTP/1.1" 200 1271 "http://10.3.0.13/webmail/src/login.php"; "Mozilla/5.0 >> (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100908 >> CentOS/3.6-2.el5.centos Firefox/3.6.9" > > Looks like you might have some weird session issue. The > src/redirect.php script should populate some things in the session, > and src/webmail.php is not finding them. The IP address of the > referrer and the host serving the pages does not match, which might > indicate a lack of shared session information between more than one > web server. > >> Proxy http Success-- >> 10.2.0.12 - - [16/Nov/2010:08:46:34 -0600] "GET /webmail/src/login.php >> HTTP/1.1" 200 2370 "http://10.3.0.13/webmail/src/webmail.php"; >> "Mozilla/5.0 >> (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100908 >> CentOS/3.6-2.el5.centos Firefox/3.6.9" >> 10.2.0.12 - - [16/Nov/2010:08:46:38 -0600] "POST >> /webmail/src/redirect.php >> HTTP/1.1" 302 - "http://10.3.0.13/webmail/src/login.php"; "Mozilla/5.0 >> (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100908 >> CentOS/3.6-2.el5.centos Firefox/3.6.9" >> 10.2.0.12 - - [16/Nov/2010:08:46:38 -0600] "GET /webmail/src/webmail.php >> HTTP/1.1" 200 343 "http://10.3.0.13/webmail/src/login.php"; "Mozilla/5.0 >> (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100908 >> CentOS/3.6-2.el5.centos Firefox/3.6.9" >> 10.2.0.12 - - [16/Nov/2010:08:46:39 -0600] "GET >> /webmail/src/left_main.php >> HTTP/1.1" 200 2838 "http://10.3.0.13/webmail/src/webmail.php"; >> "Mozilla/5.0 >> (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.
[SM-USERS] Write Only Shared Folder
I'm using Red Hat 4.0 AS / dovecot / Squirrelmail Has anyone had any luck creating a write only(rw--w--w-) shared folder? I would like the users to drop mail in this folder, but not read from it. I created a mbox file named 'spam' in a shared directory with read/write (rw-rw-rw-) permissions, and the user can move items into the folder, but with write only (rw--w--w-) the maillog has a 'permission denied' error and the user gets an error in squirrelmail: Mar 31 15:26:23 ldap imap(jt): open() failed with mbox file /home/jt/Mail//Spam: Permission denied I'm I missing something? Thanks for any help, JT --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] Write Only Shared Mail Folder
I'm using Red Hat 4.0 AS / dovecot-0.99-14 / Squirrelmail-1.4.3a-7.EL4 Has anyone had any luck creating a write only(rw--w--w-) shared folder? I would like the users to drop mail in this folder, but not read from it. I created a mbox file named 'spam' in a shared directory with read/write (rw-rw-rw-) permissions, and the user can move items into the folder, but with write only (rw--w--w-) the user gets an error in squirrelmail, and the maillog has a 'Permission denied' error: Mar 31 15:26:23 ldap imap(jt): open() failed with mbox file /home/jt/Mail/Spam: Permission denied I'm I missing something? Thanks for any help, JT --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect
> No, why? Since I've moved sessions to an NFS shared point that > should be fine. No? You WILL get goofy behaviour with this due to NFS's lack of flock() support. SQM will work, but strange things will happen (messages being deleted from the wrong folder, for example) when sessions start getting clobbered. At the very least, establish persistence to your web servers on your load balancer so the one-web-server-at-a-time can serialize requests to the PHP session as the user makes simultaneous requests. If you go to storing the sessions in the database, I don't know if load balancing will work at all without modifications being made to SQM (i.e., adding explicit row locks at appropriate places). John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect
>> At the very least, >> establish persistence to your web servers on your load balancer so the >> one-web-server-at-a-time can serialize requests to the PHP session as the >> user >> makes simultaneous requests. > > Do you have any pointers of where to go read about this? I'm about to > start down this road and surely this problem has already been solved > thousands of times All *I* did was enable the built-in persistence in LVS with a 15-second timeout. Read up on that in the docs at linuxvirtualserver.org, I guess. I've found that to be enough to avoid the clobbering, although I suppose it'd still be possible to encounter it. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect
> I was going to say "that should never happen", but if one web server > clobbers another's session file with a new user, it is slightly > possible, however you will never get the issue of you deleting a > message in one of your folders, and it deleting a message in another. > The code uses post variables to delete, so it's just not possible for > that to happen, but as I said, if the session gets clobbered by > another user, and it loads somebody elses user information, then that > is possible... though I'm not sure how PHP keeps a handle on sessions > to stop this happening in a non-load balanced situation. I'm pretty sure I've seen that happen first-hand, although it's been awhile, so perhaps not. Another example: Delete/Move Next would jumble and end up deleting the wrong message and/or moving to the incorrect "next" message and/or displaying the body of the correct message with the headers of the incorrect one (that one's documented in the archives). Many times did I have to resort to digging through my Trash folder to recover a lost message... I thought I had read that PHP will flock() the session handles, but going back to read up on it now, I can't confirm that. However, it's easy to see that on a single web server, multiple clicks inside SQM (in separate frames) will not execute simultaneously, so some server-side serialization must be going on. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect
> We use LVS to access the webservers so we have full > failover/redundancy/load balancing at webserver level. The database is > working perfect but we need to do something with it if we want to have > an automatic failover/redundancy at this level too. Do you use LVS's persistence? John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect
> I don't think this has been raised before. You are looking for a > database replacement for the attachments directory? I suppose there > could be an option to upload files straight to the db as blobs or > something, but thus far there has never been a need seen for this that I > am aware of. Keep in mind that some plugins (and maybe the core too) > will use the attachments directory for their own purposes too. That > could be fixed if we defined a save-file-in-attachments-dir function for > use by any code that wants to put a file there, but I'm not convinced > this is not overkill. It might be just as fruitful to determine if your > synch problems can be fixed at the source instead. GFS would probably be more efficient for something like this -- simplicity of NFS, but actually designed for multi-read/multi-write. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect
> - User 1 logs in to webserver 1, gets session id abc123 > > - User 2 logs in to webserver 2, gets session id abc123 and trashes > current contents of abc123 session file If using NFS as the session store, you don't even have to get this specific -- one user using "his" session from two servers simultaneously will eventually see problems. Oh, here's another example that just came to mind. It didn't happen under SQM 1.2.x, but under 1.4.x with NFS-shared userprefs files, I observed the entire file being lost and started from scratch. I was able to cause this to happen a couple dozen times without finding out exactly what was causing it, but it seems consistent with what we've been discussing. That prompted a quick switch to SQL-based prefs. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect
> No, not at all. Three consecutive request can be served by three > different webservers. So is there something in your SQL session handler (locking?) that prevents multiple servers from clashing? John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect
> Is this possible even with plain NFS if both servers point to the same > session store over NFS? I thought NFS was designed to avoid that. Is > the only solution to run NFS on top of something like GFS? What a hassle. Yes. However it is that PHP prevents multiple scripts from accessing the same session at the same time, it doesn't make the state available through the filesystem, or at least not through means supported by NFS. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect
> We do not want to use NFS for saving session data and there is anything > better than a database to keep data consistent. NFS should be fine with persistence, GFS should be fine all around, as long as PHP uses something that's NFS-safe for locking the files. For that matter though, if its locking isn't filesystem-based at all, even GFS won't solve the problem. > Another reason is that we want full/instantaneous automatic feilover. If > we use persistence with a 15-second timeout, many users will get > problems if the server they are using stops working. Doesn't LVS handle this automagically anyway? John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect
> Why would the database see it as any different from a single > server? The database doesn't. The multiple clients will get inconsistent views of the data stored within it, though. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect
> I'm still not sure WHY they will see problems. What is the difference > of 2 servers using a common store compared to 1 server with multiple accesses > to a single store? One server "knows what it's doing." One server has no idea what anyone else is doing. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect
> So your saying that between children of a webserver PHP can handle it, > but if, for example, you set up 2 webserver instances on the same machine > with different IPs to the same physical filesystem then it too would be an > issue? Is there some other directory that php uses, or is it semaphores to > talk to its own instance? It may or may not be an issue on the same physical filesystem, depending on how the locking/serialization is implemented. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect
>> If using NFS as the session store, you don't even have to get this specific >> -- >> one >> user using "his" session from two servers simultaneously will eventually see >> problems. > > Isn't that an argument not to use LVS persistence? Using persistence is a shield against this sort of problem. It allows changes to be sync'd NFS-wise and to ensure that "the previous web server" isn't doing anything else with the session file. All user activity within the persistence timeout is bound to "the previous web server" unless that server goes away. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect
> Although John's example of a single user hitting the same legitimate > session file just by doing multiple simultaneous requests from different > tabs/windows for a single login does seem like a potential problem... > again, unless PHP's locking mechanism is file system-based. (...And as long as your filesystem supports the locking mechanism -- hence the problem with NFS, hence the LVS persistence workaround.) John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect
>> Using persistence is a shield against this sort of problem. It allows >> changes >> to >> be sync'd NFS-wise and to ensure that "the previous web server" isn't doing >> anything else with the session file. All user activity within the >> persistence >> timeout is bound to "the previous web server" unless that server goes away. > > Then how would our mystery user be accessing two different web servers > in the first place per the example above? If she somehow did get two > requests to go thru two different servers as is suggested, it seems like > we are back to talking about how PHP achieves its locking (without more > information or hacks, seems like the SQL backend might be the safest > choice). With persistence, our mystery user *wouldn't* be munging things up, that's the whole point here. And don't assume ACID compliance to be a silver bullet here -- you can still have transactions walking all over each other if your session management isn't coded properly -- it's really no better in this scenario than NFS-stored PHP sessions. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect
> Looking at the php session code in the ext/session/mod_files.c file > which is what I believe is used to handle the file based sessions, > flock() is called on the session file itself, using an exclusive lock. > Maybe I missed a bit of the thread somewhere on this bit... what is > the problem with the file system-based locking? flock() doesn't work on/across/under NFS. Thus, PHP sessions aren't NFS-safe, thus, lots of us are screwed. LVS allows us to work around this problem anyway, yada yada. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] Shared Calendar plug-in status?
Hi, It's been quite a while since I've read this list, and so I'm thrilled to find the discussions about the iCal-compliant Shared Calendar plug-in. This is huge. Read and write support for iCalendar, public, private and shared groups, database back end? Awesome! I've been using SM for years, alongside Evolution and Thunderbird. I have a number of clients extremely interested in a good alternative to Exchange--and this plug-in, combined with all the iCal clients out there, sounds like a vast improvement over Exchange. So... I also see that the version of the plug-in posted to the web site is out of date. If I'm upgrading SM next week, will there be an updated plug-in posted? I'm a bit confused about the bugs people have found in the current stable version--are they (aside from the Outlook integration) resolved with the updated back ends? If not, can someone send me a copy of the latest beta? Thanks, -- John Locke "Open Source Solutions for Small Business Problems" published by Charles River Media, June 2004 http://www.freelock.com --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Shared Calendar plug-in status?
Got it... Thanks! Will check it out next week. On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 10:41 -0700, Paul Lesneiwski wrote: > Sending it to you offlist. I think most bugs have been tackled, but > people only tend to give me feedback when things are broken. :-p > > Cheers, > > Paul > > -- John Locke "Open Source Solutions for Small Business Problems" published by Charles River Media, June 2004 http://www.freelock.com --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Re: Large squirrelmail install
> Yes, I have been following that thread closely. Some very good points > have been made. I've been using SQL based prefs for a while, so that > will not be an issue. My concerns now (from a squirrelmail standpoint) > are getting the sessions stored in a DB and what to do about the > temporary attachment directories. I'd stick with NFS or give GFS a shot. Got a SAN? GFS would be sweet... John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Load Balancing and session side effect
> b) Two different servers (or the same server) trying to access the > session data for the same SID at the same time. How can a user of SM > generate two accesses to session data at the same time?. And how do you > use SM to generate two pararell accesses from two different webservers > in the cluster? Let's assume you've got two LB'd web servers balanced by rr. One click in left_main, say, "check mail," generates one session hit on the first server. The second click, say, selecting a message, generates a second session hit on the second server. If they're happening at the same time and your session store isn't lock-safe, you can end up in trouble. Is that now clear? > PS.- I do not use locking in my SQL session handler (only normal > transactions). I have never had (or got reports from other users) about > this problem, but I am interested in this discusion to find out if in > theory this can happen in a webcluster running PHP. I am not convinced, > ... yet ;) With SQL, you're a little more protected because you do at least have transactional isolation, but database locks are there for a reason. Just imagine a scenario where two instances of the same session write to the it the same variable based on two different values of some other session variable. I haven't looked at these SQL-based session handler functions in awhile, but I assume all you'd have to do to make them "balancesafe" would be to change the SELECT's to SELECT FOR UPDATE's. That brings up another point though: if PHP's session locking is based on flock(), what do you do to serialize multiple accesses even from the same web server? John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Re: Large squirrelmail install
> We've already got NFS setup and in use for our Maildirs > (qmail/vpopmail). We'll be load-balancing with an F5 BigIP, so I can > turn persistence on and maybe make the sessions work satisfactorily > over NFS. I just don't want to beat my NFS server to death, because > it's pretty busy already. I'll keep the DB prefs just because I've > been using them with no issues on a much smaller setup. FWIW, I haven't seen any impact whatsoever on the NFS box. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Re: Load Balancing and session side effect
> We are a small biz that wants to start implementing clustering of our > services, but not sure if LVS is necessary just yet. We are starting with > just two boxes with both HTTPD/SquirrelMail and MTA/IMAP on both boxes with > NFS-based backend on a 3rd machine. We'll put all mail spools and SM data > dirs and PHP sessions (file-based) on the NFS machine. > > Our question is if there will be any problems to consider starting out with > a DNS round-robin load balancing instead of more complex LVS stuff? I suggest that you not store your mail spools on NFS. Do IMAP over the network to a load-balanced imapd if you want (with GFS on shared scsi/san storage), but for heaven's sake, don't point your imapd at an NFS export. Your IMAP server shouldn't need to be load balanced anyway, so you could take that complication out of the picture if you want. Load balancing an MTA via DNS (not using MX records) seems to be asking for trouble too, although I can't put my finger on why. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ids93&alloc_id281&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
RE: [SM-USERS] Re: Load Balancing and session side effect
> What is your technical reason for this suggestion and admonition? I've > been storing mail on NFS servers successfully for almost 10 years now > with tens of thousands of active users. I've not experienced any > problems yet and I don't expect to. We tried it over a weekend; NFS performance with load-balanced courier IMAP daemons performed much worse than native storage and single imapd's. > I'm guessing you haven't had the need for active or passive redundancy > and near 100% uptime. What if he has more users than one machine can > support? That doesn't appear to be the case. And redundancy can be achieved without NFS. > If a server is down the DNS RR will still redirect users to it. Yeah, and the RR will redirect users to the down server too. Better to leave it to the MX, where remote MTA's will stop using downed servers automatically. Sorry, DNS isn't the proper way to do load balancing. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ids93&alloc_id281&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Re: Load Balancing and session side effect
> If I have more than one IMAP server (at least on different machines), then > how else do I point all IMAP servers to the mail spool beside > NFS/GFS/AFS/etc? The connection from clients (SM, etc) to IMAP will of > course be regular IMAP connections/protocol. Eventually, we have our eye on > Perdition to help load balance IMAP connections. It depends what you're doing for IMAP. Switch to cyrus, where you can support thousands of simultaneous IMAP connections on just reasonably modern hardware. Once there, implement murder to "balance" the IMAP load across multiple servers, doing it all without any shared storage. >> Your IMAP server shouldn't need to be load balanced anyway, so you could >> take that > > Why? Sorry, you said something about small company/budget. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ids93&alloc_id281&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
RE: [SM-USERS] Re: Load Balancing and session side effect
> I have not experienced any performance problems with that exact setup. I would say having 36942 email accounts is a pretty good pool to gather data from. I've used a similar setup with >50,000 accounts as well. It sounds to me that you may have had some configuration or hardware issue that you didn't discover. As far as using a single imapd, you're awfully trusting that you won't have any problems IMHO. Lack of redundancy can become very obvious when you have a failure. Could be our NFS settings. nfsd maxed out the 100mbit link regularly and of course, NFS over UDP doesn't like such environments. It was a nasty experience. >> to the MX, where remote MTA's will stop using downed servers >> automatically. > > He wasn't asking about MTA's but about imap/http load balancing via DNS RR. It will work just fine given the caveat above. I believe he was talking about SMTP as well. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ids93&alloc_id281&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] cyrus with unix hierarchy
> I am running Squirrelmail with Cyrus-IMAP, with the unixhierarchysep > and altnamespace options turned on with a prefix of mail/, for > compatibility with a previous UW-IMAP installation. Things work great > except for hierarchical folders in Squirrelmail's folder list. Only > folders with contents show up in the subscribe list, and therefore the > top-level folders do not show up in the folder list in Squirrelmail, > and the folders are therefore not collapsable. I'm currently wrestling with this as well, although with unixhierarchysep turned off. On my setup at least, the folders actually appear to cyrus to not be real folders, and don't show up when a 'reconstruct' is done for the mailbox. Is this the case for you? As far as I can tell so far, this appears to be a cyrus issue, not SQM... John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt12&alloc_id344&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] cyrus with unix hierarchy
> I will check out the reconstruct response tomorrow morning. So you're > saying that the problem is that Cyrus isn't reporting these as > mailboxes? Thunderbird and OSX Mail handle things just fine, so I > don't see why Squirrelmail shouldn't. Oh, then perhaps that's not the issue. Basically, I found that when SQM creates the sent sub-folders, for example, in the Sent.2005.05 sense, the 2005 folder doesn't show up. Checking on the filesystem, there are no cyrus.* files as there are with normal folders. Copying in a junk set and running `reconstruct -frx` fixes the problem and everything's fine in SQM. I didn't try any other IMAP clients, though. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt12&alloc_id344&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] PHP not working
Hi Guy's, I'm trying to get SquirrelMail up on IIS5 (win2K SP4). I had this part working but foolish me decided to start again and now I can't even get the basics up. ARRRGH... OK. Standard stuff I have a file info.php which contains the code "" When I go to http://localhost/info.php, it works When I go to http://localhost/mail/info.php, it doesn't I've been right through the settings again and again and I can't for the life of me think of what I did to solve it last time. please help ...(whimper) John --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] SquirrelMail not getting mail from Mercury
Hi All, I have finally got SQ working but whenever I log in I told that I must be logged on in oreder to access the page. When I compare the Mercy IMPA logs there seems to be a different set of commands issued depending on whether I login through PMail or Squirrel, e.g. This one works through PMail 11:08:11.203: << A1 OK LOGIN completed. 11:08:11.203: >> A2 LIST "" "" 11:08:11.203: << * LIST (\Noselect) "/" "" 11:08:11.203: << A2 OK LIST completed. 11:08:11.203: >> A3 LIST "" "*" 11:08:11.203: << * LIST (\NoInferiors) "/" INBOX 11:08:11.203: << * LIST (\NoInferiors) "/" INBOX.Drafts 11:08:11.203: << * LIST (\NoInferiors) "/" INBOX.Sent 11:08:11.203: << * LIST (\NoInferiors) "/" INBOX.Trash 11:08:11.203: << A3 OK LIST completed. 11:08:11.203: >> A4 STATUS "INBOX" (MESSAGES UNSEEN) 11:08:11.218: << * STATUS INBOX (MESSAGES 1 UNSEEN 0) 11:08:11.218: << A4 OK STATUS completed. 11:08:11.218: >> A8 LOGOUT This one does not work through Squirrel 19:57:53.250: << A001 OK LOGIN completed. 19:57:53.250: >> A002 CAPABILITY 19:57:53.250: << * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 X-MERCURY 19:57:53.265: << A002 OK CAPABILITY complete. 19:57:53.265: >> . LIST "INBOX" "" 19:57:53.265: << * LIST (\Noselect) "/" "" 19:57:53.265: << . OK LIST completed. 19:57:53.265: >> A003 LOGOUT The difference seems to be the LIST commands. Does anyone know how I would configure Squirrel to be able to LIST properly?? Also worth noting that this only works on Localhost. When I try to log in remotely I just get the error: PHP Warning: main(../config/config.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in D:\Website\WEBDATA\mail\functions\global.php on line 18 PHP Fatal error: main(): Failed opening required '../config/config.php' (include_path='.;c:\php4\pear') in D:\Website\WEBDATA\mail\functions\global.php on line 18 Many thanks John
[SM-USERS] Attachment download problem
Hi, I just upgraded Apache/PHP and now the 'download attachment' box does not display in the message view window. Current configuration: FreeBSD: 4.7 Apache: 2.0.54 PHP: 4.3.11 UW IMAP: IMAP4rev1 2003.338 SM: 1.4.2 Details: 1) Other non-web based mail clients handle the attachments fine. 2) The message list windows shows that there is an attachment(s). 3) The 'message details' plugin shows all message parts including the attachment. 4) I tried downgrading PHP to version 4.3.3 - no joy 5) I upgraded IMAP to version IMAP4rev1 2004.357 - no joy 6) I upgraded Squirrelmail to 1.4.4 - no joy 7) If I connect SM to another IMAP server (Courier/Qmail) download attachments works correctly. 8) I've checked my php.ini file and see no obvious config errors I thought the error might be with the PHP imap module until I realized that SM doesn't use it. I am at a loss as to what to try next. Thanks for any help, John John Sydnor Network Administrator Sensaria Natural Bodycare [EMAIL PROTECTED] support: 360.432.4000 direct: 360-432-4040 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
RE: [SM-USERS] Attachment download problem
Hi, >Hello John Sydnor, >On Tuesday, May 31, 2005, you wrote: >> Hi, >> I just upgraded Apache/PHP and now the 'download attachment' box does >> not display in the message view window. > Can you be more specific? "download attachment" box doesn't mean too > much, does it prompt you to save? Or does it just tick along until the > page times out when you click on the link? 'Download Attachment box' refers to the HTML generated by the src/download.php file in the message view window WHEN the message has an attachment. I list the messages in my INBOX. I choose one that has an attachment and click on it. The message view window loads correctly BUT does not Display the dialog necessary for me to download the Attachment. In other words it displays the message as If there is no attachment. >> Current configuration: >> FreeBSD: 4.7 >> Apache: 2.0.54 >> PHP: 4.3.11 >> UW IMAP: IMAP4rev1 2003.338 >> SM: 1.4.2 >> Details: >> 1) Other non-web based mail clients handle the attachments fine. >> 2) The message list windows shows that there is an >> attachment(s). >> 3) The 'message details' plugin shows all message parts >> including >> the attachment. >> 4) I tried downgrading PHP to version 4.3.3 - no joy >> 5) I upgraded IMAP to version IMAP4rev1 2004.357 - no joy >> 6) I upgraded Squirrelmail to 1.4.4 - no joy >Did you downgrade again? Actually, I just created another instance of SquirrelMail in a different directory. So both versions are installed and operational. >> 7) If I connect SM to another IMAP server (Courier/Qmail) >> download attachments works correctly. >> 8) I've checked my php.ini file and see no obvious config errors >> I thought the error might be with the PHP imap module until I realized >> that SM doesn't use it. > Did you check the web log files? Yes - No errors. Thanks, John -- Jonathan Angliss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
RE: [SM-USERS] using qmail + vpopmail, how to config sqwebmail
Hello Winanjaya - PBXSoftwares, The only difference in setting up SM for Qmail + Vpopmail is that The login requires the mail domain as well as the username: Login: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Password: Take care, John John Sydnor Network Administrator Sensaria Natural Bodycare [EMAIL PROTECTED] support: 360.432.4000 direct: 360-432-4040 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:squirrelmail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Angliss > Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 6:21 PM > To: Winanjaya - PBXSoftwares > Cc: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] using qmail + vpopmail, how to config sqwebmail > > Hello Winanjaya - PBXSoftwares, > On Monday, June 06, 2005, you wrote: > > > Sorry I already mistyped .. what I need is to get help for configuring > > squirrelmail works together with qmail + vpopmail.. > > any suggestion? > > A quick google, and I found: > > http://www.qmailrocks.org > > While it may be a little overkill for what you're after, it certainly > providers information on installing SquirrelMail with qmail. There is > of course the INSTALL file, the wiki (http://www.squirrelmail.org > click on documentation), and the list archives. > > -- > Jonathan Angliss > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > --- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. How far can you > shotput > a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge > track? > If you want to score the big prize, get to know the little guy. > Play to win an NEC 61" plasma display: http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 > -- > squirrelmail-users mailing list > Posting Guidelines: > http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines > List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List Archives: > http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user > List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 > List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. How far can you shotput a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge track? If you want to score the big prize, get to know the little guy. Play to win an NEC 61" plasma display: http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
RE: [SM-USERS] Squirrellmail/Webmail Page
Thanks for you quick response. At first I was little bit intimidated. As matter of facts what I am trying to do is, to replace that big bold underlined label "WEBMAIL" user sees when first log on to my squirrelmail server: http://mail.mycompany.com with my company's logo and label without messing up anything. I hope that explains a bit. Thanks again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Donker Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 12:04 PM To: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrellmail/Webmail Page Kathy Kingsford wrote: > Folks -- > The first time I asked this question I got shout at, probably cursed > at and may be kicked into recycle bin. I am sure the question is very > basic to most of you gurus, but I am a newbie and I am doing the best > I can to become a guru as well. My question is, I am searching for > documentation(s) that will help me customize the default web page of > my Webmail with my company logo and some other good suff. Please I > know this is just a "walk in the park" for most of you, but consider > me as a newbie in Linux struggling to become a guru. Would you help me > PLEASE? Ok, no problem, but can you tell us a little bit more what exactly you are having problems with? I'm sure you've searched the archive, or looked at the SM pages and found http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/en_US/EmbeddedSquirrelMailLogin So...which part are you having troubles with again? No need to be a linux guru for this, just put some effort in it...this would be totally os independent ;) -Patrick --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] mangled cc when using auto_cc plugin
Hi. We've discovered that auto_cc fails to parse nicely with squirrelmail when doing a reply all. It get's thrown off while parsing. Does anyone have a fix for this? Thanks. -John How to reproduce the error... Running the auto_cc plugin - try setting a name and yourself address for auto cc. Here's I'll use [EMAIL PROTECTED] as "my" address. compose. from: joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to: buddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> auto_cc builds: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] send and receive it gets: from "joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to: "buddy" [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] so now reply all. it builds: from: joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to: "joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> auto_cc plugin makes a mess, with buddy moved to be by itself. cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], buddy, [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've reproduced this with sq 1.4.4 and auto_cc v2.0 http://www.squirrelmail.org/plugin_download.php?id=28&rev=926 --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] Deleting emails
Title: Message
Dear Squirrelmail
Team
I often check my
email sent to my home pc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from here at my
(part time) work ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), by going into
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. I notice that
when I delete from my ("home'') inbox while here at work( usually where some
spam mail has managed to get in), then, when I get home, the emails I deleted
successfully while at work, are still in my inbox at home!
Is there a way you
can make sure that whenever I delete mail from wherever, it stays
deleted!?
Many thanks for your
help
J.K.E.Ryan
email
addresses as above (see
Cc)
041 581 0917
082 761
2625
[SM-USERS] Multiple images become unavailable after viewing first image
Greetings, I am going to try my luck here before posting a bug, hopefully someone will have some information on this..I have read bug report descriptions but havent yet found a match. I am running SM 1.4.5, PHP 4.4.0, Apache 1.3.33, on Gentoo linux. I had e-accelerator running but disabled it to eliminate it as a cause. When I receive an email with multiple images attached to it, I can click on the filename of one of the images and view it in the main frame. However, if I hit "Back" to go back to the email, I get an empty main frame. If I click on Inbox again, I can see the list of messages in my inbox again, but any attempt to view the message that had the images attached results in an empty frame. Exiting out of SM and then logging back in seems to make the email viewable again, but I can repeat this process and the email will become empty again. It doesnt seem to matter what image is viewed first, as soon as the first image is displayed in the main frame, I cannot get back to the content of the email without logging out and logging back in. There are not any errors in my apache error log. Any help is appreciated, Regards, -John --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Multiple images become unavailable after viewing first image
>> >>When I receive an email with multiple images attached to it, I can click >>on the filename of one of the images and view it in the main frame. >>However, if I hit "Back" to go back to the email, I get an empty main >>frame. If I click on Inbox again, I can see the list of messages in my >>inbox again, but any attempt to view the message that had the images >>attached results in an empty frame. >> >>Exiting out of SM and then logging back in seems to make the email >>viewable again, but I can repeat this process and the email will become >>empty again. It doesnt seem to matter what image is viewed first, as >>soon as the first image is displayed in the main frame, I cannot get >>back to the content of the email without logging out and logging back >>in. There are not any errors in my apache error log. > > > Sounds like buggy IE behavior. You need to tell what browser you are > using and if you can reproduce in another browser. Also show more info > about IMAP server, etc, per posting guidelines that I'm sure you've > read, right? > > http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines > Sorry, here's more info: The problem exists using both Internet Explorer version 6 and Mozilla Firefox version 1.0.7 * I am using courier IMAP server version 4.0.1 compiled from the gentoo ebuild * PHP version 4.4.0 compiled by hand * Apache version 1.3.33 compiled by hand * Gentoo linux * Squirrelmail installed by hand * Plugins I have installed: vlogin-3.6-1.2.7, unsafe_image_rules.0.7-1.4, sasql-3.1.1, address_add.2.0-1.2.8, compatibility (1.3?) Thanks again for any help, I am going to continue looking through bug reports, but no match yet Thanks, -John -- John Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Multiple images become unavailable after viewing first image
> Empty frame (not "cannot be found" kind of things) is usually indicative > of PHP errors. Show your error_reporting and display_errors settings > from php.ini or any .htaccess in SM directories (or apache conf file). > Try using debugger plugin to see if you can ge I had: error_reporting = E_ALL display_errors = Off log_errors = On Despite having log_errors set to on, there was nothing in the logs. I changed display_errors to On, and now when I click on the link for the image I get: The image https://mail.xxx.net/src/download.php?startMessage=1&passed_id=185497&mailbox=INBOX&ent_id=2&passed_ent_id=0” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. And then when I click on the back button, I get: Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in /usr/local/apache/htdocs/squirrelmail-1.4.5/src/read_body.php on line 431 And then every subsequent attempt to access this email gives that last error message. There are no other additional errors in my logs -John --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Multiple images become unavailable after viewing first image - SOLVED
Just wanted to let everyone interested know that the problem was caused by register_globals. I have always had it enabled for compatibility purposes with older software, but I guess 1.4.5 was more upset about it than previous versions. I turned it off, and all is good. Thanks again to everyone for helping solve this issue. -John Tomas Kuliavas wrote: Greetings, I am going to try my luck here before posting a bug, hopefully someone will have some information on this..I have read bug report descriptions but havent yet found a match. I am running SM 1.4.5, PHP 4.4.0, Apache 1.3.33, on Gentoo linux. I had e-accelerator running but disabled it to eliminate it as a cause. When I receive an email with multiple images attached to it, I can click on the filename of one of the images and view it in the main frame. However, if I hit "Back" to go back to the email, I get an empty main frame. If I click on Inbox again, I can see the list of messages in my inbox again, but any attempt to view the message that had the images attached results in an empty frame. Exiting out of SM and then logging back in seems to make the email viewable again, but I can repeat this process and the email will become empty again. It doesnt seem to matter what image is viewed first, as soon as the first image is displayed in the main frame, I cannot get back to the content of the email without logging out and logging back in. There are not any errors in my apache error log. In php 4.4.0 register_globals value is set to off by default. Somebody turned register_globals on. Please turn them off. http://www.php.net/manual/en/security.registerglobals.php If you search for 'register_globals' or 'read_body.php on line 431' or 'Call to a member function on a non-object' in mailing list archives, you will find numerous replies with same answer. Turn off register_globals. Fixed in 1.4.6cvs. See fix at http://cvs.sf.net/viewcvs.py/squirrelmail/squirrelmail/src/download.php?r1=1.107.2.8&r2=1.107.2.10 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] Bug Report
WARNINGS WERE REPORTED WITH YOUR SETUP -- SEE BELOW I subscribe to the squirrelmail-users mailing list. [ ] True - No need to CC me when replying [ ] False - Please CC me when replying This bug occurs when I ... ... view a particular message ... use a specific plugin/function ... try to do/view/use The description of the bug: will not load ldap address directory, saying that the php ldap module is not loaded, but it is. I can reproduce the bug by: (Optional) I got bored and found the bug occurs in: (Optional) I got really bored and here's a fix: -- My browser information: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050720 Fedora/1.0.6-1.1.fc3 Firefox/1.0.6 My web server information: PHP Version 4.3.9 PHP Extensions (List) * 0 = yp * 1 = xml * 2 = wddx * 3 = tokenizer * 4 = sysvshm * 5 = sysvsem * 6 = standard * 7 = sockets * 8 = shmop * 9 = session * 10 = pspell * 11 = posix * 12 = pcre * 13 = overload * 14 = mime_magic * 15 = iconv * 16 = gmp * 17 = gettext * 18 = ftp * 19 = exif * 20 = dio * 21 = dbx * 22 = dba * 23 = curl * 24 = ctype * 25 = calendar * 26 = bz2 * 27 = bcmath * 28 = zlib * 29 = openssl * 30 = apache2handler * 31 = pgsql SquirrelMail-specific information: Version: 1.4.5 Plugins (List) * 0 = calendar * 1 = filters * 2 = listcommands * 3 = squirrelspell * 4 = administrator * 5 = bug_report * 6 = abook_take * 7 = address_add WARNINGS WERE REPORTED WITH YOUR SETUP: LDAP server defined in SquirrelMail config, but the module is not loaded in PHP * Reconfigure PHP with the option '--with-ldap' * Then recompile PHP and reinstall * -- OR -- * Reconfigure SquirrelMail to not use LDAP 1 warning(s) reported. -- My IMAP server information: Server type: courier Server info: * OK [HIDDEN] IMAP4rev1 NAMESPACE AUTH=CRAM-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-SHA1 AUTH=CRAM-SHA256 CHILDREN IDLE QUOTA SORT THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES UIDPLUS ACL ACL2=UNION STARTTLS] Courier-IMAP ready. Copyright 1998-2005 Double Precision, Inc. See COPYING for distribution information. Capabilities: IMAP4rev1 NAMESPACE AUTH=CRAM-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-SHA1 AUTH=CRAM-SHA256 CHILDREN IDLE QUOTA SORT THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES UIDPLUS ACL ACL2=UNION STARTTLS --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] .pref file corrupted by other user data
Hi. Yesterday we apparently had a user contaminate another user's pref file with contents much like that of the contaminating user. diff'ing the two, the sort value was different (one =1, one =0) otherwise identical. The pref file which had the correct name/addresses had a recent modification date, which predated the time the bogus information was used in an email by the effected user. I lost the modification date information on the corrupted pref file when I edit corrected the user name/email contents. Anyway, I've reviewed the list activity and bug tracker and see lots of posting on similar observations, most from several years ago, with no excellent solution apparent. (bug track 751989 being open). Today these two users didn't share a common machine to the best of my knowledge which makes it somewhat different than the usual description. Users preferences being overwritten by other users: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=311&atid=100311&func=detail&aid=751989 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=311&atid=100311&func=detail&aid=647612 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user/17050/match=pref http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.suse.general/41452/match=pref http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user/7489 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user/2495 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user/21592 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user/3563/match=pref http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user/25366 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user/7869/match=pref I'm running 1.4.5 on a freebsd machine. php4-4.3.11_1 register_globals off apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22 plugins 1. squirrelspell 2. delete_move_next 3. message_details 4. abook_import_export 5. address_add 6. archive_mail 7. askuserinfo 8. autocomplete 9. msg_flags 10. select_range 11. show_headers 12. password_forget 13. compatibility 14. check_quota 15. filters 16. avelsieve 17. auto_cc 18. secure_login I've just upgraded compatibility to 2.0.2 and address_add to 2.1-1.4.0 since experiencing the pref contamination. When this corruption occurs, and I don't know the exact mechanism, a user doesn't know their preferences are wrong as they send a message. They are silently misidentified in the header. Helpful thoughts sought. Thanks John --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] .pref file corrupted by other user data
At 03:34 AM 10/26/2005, Jonathan Angliss wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, October 26, 2005 01:28, john crawford wrote: > Hi. > Yesterday we apparently had a user contaminate another user's pref > file with contents much like that of the contaminating user. diff'ing the > two, the sort value was different (one =1, one =0) otherwise identical. > The pref file which had the correct name/addresses had a > recent modification date, which predated the time the bogus information was > used in an email by the effected user. I lost the modification date > information on the corrupted pref file when I edit corrected the user > name/email contents. > > Anyway, I've reviewed the list activity and bug tracker and see lots of > posting on similar observations, most from several years ago, with no > excellent solution apparent. (bug track 751989 being open). Today these > two users didn't share a common machine to the best of my knowledge which > makes it somewhat different than the usual description. There is a PHP bug reported a few times on the php bug tracker that reports that in some rare cases, the session cookie is not being deleted, but replaced with the text 'deleted'. When another computer gets the same cookie, and they both attempt to start a session, they both end up seeing the same session files, and various preferences and what not get corrupted. This is the only explanation I can think of that would result in two sessions, on physically seperate machines, being corrupted. Can you check where PHP is saving your session files, and see if you have sess_deleted files? Hi. Thanks for your help Jonathan, My php session files are all recent, and none appear with the file name sess_deleted, rather all are uniformly recent and of the form sess_3768815a66a940232 (etc). To correct your summary thought above, I'm seeing known corruption in this incident in one account pref file. Both user "a" and user "d" were on yesterday, no overlap on computers station use. User a had updated sorting preferences during the last days, perhaps yesterday too. User a apparently updated the pref file at (about) 1:40pm yesterday. About 20 minutes later, user d was sending messages with a pref file that looked like user a's pref (with the difference being sort options). So I'm thinking user a's preference change went to user d or user a's old pref file went to user d then user a's was updated correctly. More information... We've seen this happen once before without having the opportunity to fully study it, 2 months ago. And oddly enough it was the same user "a" name/address that showed up in another (not user d) user's preferences. A bit odd it was the same user information injected into another pref file twice now. I just sat with user A at a windows 2000 desktop and there were no exceptional messages with the session experience. We modified the preferences by hand and saved it with success (and no corruption of other user preferences). For whatever it's worth, she was using an older mac at home yesterday when things went wrong. "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.17; Mac_PowerPC). Thank you, John - -- Jonathan Angliss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkNfMXMACgkQK4PoFPj9H3OZhgCdGPsABOi3DK8wrRwUpl6wRcDj SBQAoMwn1uW9Ck3foLMQjTQqpeHFrsvO =d0TK -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] .pref file corrupted by other user data
At 05:12 PM 10/27/2005, Rafael Martinez wrote: On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 14:16 -0500, Jonathan Angliss wrote: [] > > Would it be possible to perform a few tests? Open a browser on user A, go > to the login page, login, see what cookies you have been assigned and find > out the session id... make a note... restart the browser... rinse, repeat.. > Hello Jonathan I really think this has something to do with a problem we had in our system some months ago. More information here: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=12715881 We patched our code so it does not use a SID with a value like 'deleted' or not a 32 long char string and the problem is gone. Tak Rafael, Thanks Jonathan, I like the odds of this being our problem. It's hard to believe two session keys in a large space of random nature would map identically very often (and if it would, I'd expect the possibility to be caught by the code in some way). I was about to add the entropy settings for php.ini when I read Rafael's message. Could you share your patch bits Rafael? I didn't see a sess_deleted file in the php file cache, but it could have been deleted by the time I looked. As for checking out the session ID from the user A client to see if the session is surviving browser life cycles, I've not done that yet. (It's someone's home machine, and I'm fighting with IE). While pre-testing the procedure of viewing the cookies with another client with IE 5.x, I'm afraid I can't see the cookies in the "Temporary Internet Files" directory. The cookie manager in Mozilla makes inspection much easier. Any ideas why the IE cookies are elusive? My zones look open and I can accept cookies if I enforce the query (and view content at that point), but I don't see any cookies appear (just graphic files) in the windows TIF directory. I thought it was interesting that http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=33526 mentions the "deleted" setting bug to be related to client computer dates being in the distant past. I wonder if you had a feel, Rafael, for what common points there were to clients that had exhibited the flaw. I'm still working to understand this. thanks again to you both for your assistance. John -- Rafael Martinez, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo, Norway PGP Public Key: http://folk.uio.no/rafael/ --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] .pref file corrupted by other user data
Hello.
As I've now seen sess_deleted files show up in the php
cache, it seems to be an issue with the sess_deleted php / IE bug.
If I run from cron pretty aggressively
find /var/spool/php -name '*deleted*' -print | xargs -I {} sh -c "ls
-lT {} | /var/qmail/bin/mailsubj "sess_deleted" [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I detect the file. Maybe some IE users have the date badly set in
their hardware and IE doesn't do
the fall-back aged session deletion.
Can someone help me with the php workaround for squirrelmail to avoid this
and/or
recommend a solid version of php that does a better job of closing
out sessions?
As a quick ugly patch, if I just delete the sess_deleted file from
cron, the effective user would have to
log in again. Wouldn't they get a valid session token the second time around?
thanks.
John
At 05:12 PM 10/27/2005, Rafael Martinez wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 14:16 -0500, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
[]
>
> Would it be possible to perform a few tests? Open a browser on user A, go
> to the login page, login, see what cookies you have been assigned and find
> out the session id... make a note... restart the browser... rinse, repeat..
>
Hello Jonathan
I really think this has something to do with a problem we had in our
system some months ago. More information here:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=12715881
We patched our code so it does not use a SID with a value like 'deleted'
or not a 32 long char string and the problem is gone.
--
Rafael Martinez, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Center for Information Technology Services
University of Oslo, Norway
PGP Public Key: http://folk.uio.no/rafael/
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course
Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005
Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines:
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List Archives:
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] .pref file corrupted by other user data
At 07:27 AM 10/31/2005, Rafael Martinez Guerrero wrote: On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 23:33, john crawford wrote: Hello > > As I've now seen sess_deleted files show up in the php > cache, it seems to be an issue with the sess_deleted php / IE bug. > This is not an IE bug. I have seen users with this problem using firefox,IE,mozilla,safari and Opera with Windows and Mac Oh, Okay. I though it was mainly IE that didn't get the cookies deleted and relied on expiration to crush it. > If I run from cron pretty aggressively > [] You can not run a job from cron more than one time every min. This is not enougth, specially in a busy system. You have 1 min. where everything can happen. Yes. A quick hack at the time. But I did sleep for a few seconds iteratively and so ran it several times during each minute run. > As a quick ugly patch, if I just delete the sess_deleted file from > cron, the effective user would have to > log in again. Wouldn't they get a valid session token the second time around? > I am not 100% sure about this . but what I can see in the logs is that the same users have the same problem again and again so they don't get a valid session token the second time. Okay, well I did put into effect the modifications that Jonathan recommended and so I believe I'm regenerating cookies if the "deleted" cookie is stored by the client. Rafael, I'm wondering why you combined a test for a 32 char string with your "deleted" test. From Aug 26: >We patched our code so it does not use a SID with a value like 'deleted' >or not a 32 long char string and the problem is gone. Why the 32 char string test? I'm not sure why you included that. By the way, one of the user's who was involved in the pref mixup incident (user "a") has checked and did find the system date of the client was off by much more than 1 year and one day. So maybe that explains the cookie expiration not taking effect. (Though I would hope that timeout values would have some other reference than client-set-time). Thanks. John -- Rafael Martinez, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo, Norway PGP Public Key: http://folk.uio.no/rafael/ --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] problem with some messages not being displayed
Hi I seem to have a problem with some messages not being displayed in squirrelmail. I see the message in the list of messages without any problems and it shows that it has an attachment. However when I click on the message the message displays: Subject:All the Info you need for the UTSC Social Forum From: "W.A.R. U of T" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, October 30, 2005 3:37 am To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (more) Priority: Normal But nothing appears in the body. I can view this message fine if I look at in sylpheed over IMAP and I can also view the message fine if I look at in openxchange's webmail interface so the problem appears specific to squirrelmail. The problem doesn't appear to be restricted to messages from a particular server ie they are not all from gmail addresses. I think that it might be restricted to messages with attachments but most messages with attachments don't have this problem. Anyone have any ideas? Will keep trying to track down the cases where it is happening. cheers John -- John Habermann The Wilderness Society www.wilderness.org.au --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] problem with some messages not being displayed
On 11/6/05, Jonathan Angliss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Please try to CC the list on replies so they too can get the benefit of > the information. Sorry about that. > > On Sat, November 5, 2005 21:49, john habermann wrote: > >>> I seem to have a problem with some messages not being displayed in > >>> squirrelmail. I see the message in the list of messages without any > >>> problems and it shows that it has an attachment. However when I click > >>> on the message the message displays: > >> > >> [..] > > >>> But nothing appears in the body. I can view this message fine if I > >>> look at in sylpheed over IMAP and I can also view the message fine if > >>> I look at in openxchange's webmail interface so the problem appears > >>> specific to squirrelmail. The problem doesn't appear to be restricted > >>> to messages from a particular server ie they are not all from gmail > >>> addresses. I think that it might be restricted to messages with > >>> attachments but most messages with attachments don't have this > >>> problem. Anyone have any ideas? > > >> http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines > > >> You've not really provided too much about your setup for us to be of > >> any help. > > [..] > > > My apologies I had done a quick search of the archives but hadn't come > > up with anything that appeared similar to my problem and fired off a quick > > email. > > > The server is debian sarge and the squirrelmail version is Version: > > 2:1.4.5-1 > > which I pulled in from testing. > > > Php is the default debian sarge version 4.3.10-16 > > Apache is the default 1.3 debian sarge version. > > > The imap server is courier-imap and I am using the > > courier-imap-4.0.3.20050716 version built from source and this is running > > in conjunction with qmail compiled according to the instructions from the > > qmail rocks site with pataches as per the qmailrocks default install. > > > Installed plugins are: > > Installed Plugins > > 1. translate > > 2. squirrelspell > > 3. administrator > > 4. newmail > > 5. sent_subfolders > > 6. listcommands > > 7. message_details > > 8. address_add > > 9. compatibility > > 10. autocomplete > > 11. calendar > > 12. calendar_file_backend > > 13. todo > > 14. gpg > > Try disabling this one and see if it helps Beautiful it works fine now, I can see the body of the message is now displayed. I wonder why the gpg plugin could be causing this the message doesn't appear to be signed and is in plain text. These are the attachments to the message: untitled-[1.1] 1.6 k [ text/plain ] Download | View utsc_interior_colour.pdf1.7 M [ application/pdf ] Download mq-mapgend.websys.aol.gif 106 k [ image/gif ]Download UTSC Social Forum Official Schedule.pdf 304 k [ application/pdf ] Download > > > 15. html_mail > > 16. folder_synch > > 17. timeout_user > > 18. msg_flags > > 19. spamcop > > 20. forced_prefs > > > The probem is that the some messages bodies are simply not displayed. > > When you say "not displayed" do you mean the page comes up blank > completely, or do you mean that the page loads, but the actual email > contents are missing? The page loads but the actual email body is not displayed. So I would see the following: Subject:All the Info you need for the UTSC Social Forum From: "W.A.R. U of T" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, October 30, 2005 3:37 am To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (more) Priority: Normal Options:View Full Header | View Printable Version | View Message details | Add to Addressbook but there would be nothing in the body. Thank you very much for your help Jonathan > > - -- > Jonathan Angliss > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkNtifgACgkQK4PoFPj9H3NEzgCfQ5DiTUfQ83uiKaQY95T55Wi0 > 7bYAoIguh/nzA3nWqGJKFubqt4es4DZ5 > =iRRr > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > -- John Habermann The Wilderness Society www.wilderness.org.au --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] session size and performance?
I've noticed that over time, a SQM session will gradually slow down to the point I think there's something wrong with the mail server. A logout/login fixes the issue. Checking into the session files (shared between nodes over NFS), I found that while the initial session file is quite small, it grows over time and quickly becomes ridiculously large, like 2-4MB. I assume this is the reason for the performance degredation. Is there any explanation for this and is it normal? Is there setting to put a cap on session size? Thanks, John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] session size and performance?
>On my server (OpenBSD 3.6-STABLE, PHP 4.4.0), once the session > files get to about 1MB Apache starts eating RAM like candy. I can > easily let it go until I have httpd processes eating 50-65MB of RAM > each. When this happens, the web interface slows to a crawl for > all users. I'm not seeing this behavior at all. You might try playing with apache's maxrequestsperchild to keep the children fresh. >In my case, logging out and back in isn't sufficient, unless I > let the children httpd processes all die. If I log out, bounce > Apache, and log back it everything returns to normal, with the httpd > processes eating about 20MB per child (normal). Yeah, that's about where they are on my cluster at the moment and the freshest apache restart was Sept 08. I'd say you've got other issues. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] session size and performance?
> Yes, if you do not use server side sorting and deal with large mailboxes > then the session can become pretty big in 1.4.5 because it fetches the > headers of each message in a mailbox in order to do the sort. I'm already on server-side sorting. Soon to be 750k mailboxes here, not going to do that sorting in PHP. ;) John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] session size and performance?
> Please list your plugins (and any other relevant versioning and > configuration info - PLEASE see posting guidelines). The only plugin > Benny listed that may be at issue is the (shared) calendar, although it > doesn't put *that* much into the session, unless you have some big > calendars. Ya, my bad. Didn't think the plugins were relevant. Here you go: $plugins[0] = 'translate'; $plugins[1] = 'squirrelspell'; $plugins[2] = 'sent_subfolders'; $plugins[3] = 'mail_fetch'; $plugins[4] = 'listcommands'; $plugins[5] = 'message_details'; $plugins[6] = 'preview_pane'; $plugins[7] = 'delete_move_next'; $plugins[8] = 'attachment_tnef'; $plugins[9] = 'abook_take'; $plugins[10] = 'avelsieve'; $plugins[11] = 'useracl'; $plugins[12] = 'check_quota'; $plugins[13] = 'compatibility'; $plugins[14] = 'html_mail'; -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] session size and performance?
> I didn't say for sure that they WERE relevant. :) And they do not > appear to be to me. However, you might try deactivating them all just > for kicks, which would be very helpful. Otherwise, you still have not > complied with the posting guidelines and posted any version info > whatsoever, etc. Always assume the current -- 1.4.5. I don't imagine it's anything related to plugins, I've seen this behavior for years. I'm not in a position to go turning them off at the moment and it takes too long to figure out which changes work. What I'm looking for is a general "yeah, look over here" sort of response. Surely others have seen large session files in this or any other PHP app... John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] session size and performance?
>> What I'm looking for is a general "yeah, look over here" sort of >> response. Surely others have seen large session files in this or any >> other PHP app... > > could you check contents of session file? Next time I get a big one, I'll gzip it and post it here. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: Re[2]: [SM-USERS] session size and performance?
> I'm trying to work out what "750k mailboxes" is exactly. Do you have > 750k users on your server? Do you [personally] have 750k emails in > your mailboxes? Do you [personally] have 750k "folders"? Or the last > possible combination I can think of is that your mailbox /size/ is > 750k? ;) Oh, no, sorry, 750k *users*. And that's what we expect to reach over the next year or so, not what we have at the moment. The folder count will be well into the millions. > We don't know > anything about your PHP, your IMAP server, etc etc. Did you read the > list guidelines? Not that it exempts me from them, but I've been here longer than the list guidelines. :) Nonetheless, I'm reading them, so here are the details which will likely not provide you with anything useful in this case: * IMAP Server: Cyrus 2.2.12 * PHP: Debian's PHP4, v4.3.10-15 * Web server: Debian's apache-ssl, v1.3.33-6 * Platform: Debian 3.1 * How your software was installed: Deb's, except for the SQM 1.4.4 tarball, patched for the vulns. * SquirrelMail: 1.4.4+, 1.4.5ish. * Plugins you've installed: see previous post. * Any notes that might make your install different: I've patched up the preview pane plugin to be a little more sane, made some changes to page_header.php to make it more preview-pane friendly, other misc wording changes. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] session size and performance?
> This is a user-configurable option in the plugin. I'm running v1.2, I see no such option. > Need details. Changes to the message header to not bother with the menu_line if the pane is turned on. I think I changed a couple other things there. > I'm willing to hear other ideas, but sounds like there is something > funny on your end...? Could be. But we're way off-topic already. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] session size and performance?
>> I'm running v1.2, I see no such option.
>
> Options->Display Prefs->"Always Refresh Message List When Using Preview
> Pane"
Oh, I see what you're saying. Yeah, that causes a refresh, but there's a race
condition there -- sometimes the message is flagged as read, sometimes left as
unseen, depending on which came first, the view or the refresh. I changed it
to
reload the top frame with javascript on load of the preview. i.e.:
function ivt_hacks()
{
if(parent.top)
{
parent.right.location.reload();
}
}
>> Changes to the message header to not bother with the menu_line if the pane is
>> turned on. I think I changed a couple other things there.
>
> The menu line is not shown in the preview pane if you apply the patch
> that comes with the plugin.
Ah.
John
--
John Madden
UNIX Systems Engineer
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines:
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List Archives:
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Mail Server Performance Problem.
> Courrier- Imap > > Everything ran fine untill we got less than 2000 mails per folder. At this > time I > began by trying to optimize the system. Investigate a switch to Cyrus. I was up against the same things with Courier (a few thousand users, about 2 million emails) and I believe it comes down to the architecture of the software. Don't get me wrong, I love courier and still run it in smaller installations, but nothing beats Cyrus' indexing for high-volume IMAP servers. > This increased a bit the performance but not in such a miracle way. The > problem is > we are now 10 users to use this system > and we got more than 30 folders with more 20.000 mails ( !!! for each folder > !!! Check your filesystem too. Consider something more modern like reiserfs. > - 1.300.000 mails > - 10 users *10* users?! > - It seems RAID-5 is not the best solution for a mail system and the solution > sould be to use a RAID-0 ??? 0+1 or 10, don't ever use 0. :) > - It seems that it would be nice to take the average mail size and to adapt > the > block filesystem factor with this value ... > so is UFS the right system for this ??? It's the FreeBSD version, so UFS might be sufficient. (For a second there, I was worried you were talking Solaris' UFS, which is terrible.) > So, before changing anything on our mail system, could you please give me all > kind > of information to optimize/install mail > servers on Unix's ( Linux, FreeBSD, ... ), filesystems, PHP Values for mail > servers. PHP's not the problem here, it's your IMAP server (or *maybe* filesystem/disks). I'd setup cyrus and migrate a couple mailboxes over to see if you notice any improved performance metrics. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Any large scale, >50,000 user, installations of SquirrelMail?
> We currently have 15K users on our SquirrelMail service. Has anyone scaled > this to > 50,000 - 100,000 subscibers? We're trying to decide whether to stay with > SquirrelMail and one of the criteria is scalability. We're about to go live (first of the year) here with ~70,000 users (staff, faculty, students). The number of accounts is expected to grow over the semesters into the ~750k range, but the number of active users is what you've really go to be concerned with. Fortunately, SQM is written in PHP, so it scales horizontally very well (we run on LVS with an NFS PHP and session store). It's definitely capable of supporting that number of users if you can throw enough web servers at the problem. What about your IMAP server though? Is it capable of handling several thousand simultaneous sessions? John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] PLEASE HELP
My yahoo address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please take this off of your list as I am not an subscriber and do not want to be. John Paden__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: [SM-USERS] The best IMAP4 server for SM 1.4.x
> What is the disadvantages of both cyrus and courier > from your experience? > > What about Dovecot, is it an option too or not? I'd place Dovecot on about the same level as courier (although it's perhaps a bit less mature). (I have no personal experience with a Dovecot installation.) Courier is great for smaller sites, it's very reliable and very easy to maintain, but it doesn't scale well due to its Maildir storage. For large sites, I believe cyrus is the only way to go. John -- John Madden Sr. UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
