[SM-USERS] Reply/Reply All address incorrect after svn update on 1/6/12 (version 14257:14264M)

2012-01-09 Thread David C. Rankin
Paul,all

  I have encountered a strange problem in 1.5 after an svn update to svn version
14257:14264M on Friday 1/6/12. When a user sends an e-mail that originates in
squirrelmail, any recipient that attempts to reply (or reply-all) to that
e-mail, gets an incorrect e-mail address for the original sender inserted into
the 'To:' field of the reply. (basically '@domain')  It appears that
squirrelmail is somehow incorrectly inserting  '@domain' into the header instead
of either (1) the senders e-mail or (2) the specific 'reply-to:' address the
sender has set in the 'Options/Personal Information' setting.

  When a reply is attempted to a e-mail sent from squirrelmail, it appears that
the information from:

./conf.pl -> (2) Server Settings -> (1) Domain

with an '@' prepended is what the person trying to reply to the message sees in
the 'To:' field after hitting reply?? Basically, when someone hits reply, they
see '@domain' as the address going back to the original squirrelmail sender. In
order to successfully reply to messages sent from squirrelmail, those trying to
reply must manually copy and paste the original senders e-mail into the 'To:'
field of the reply replacing the '@domain' address.

  This is new behavior in 1.5 as we have used squirrelmail for years and have
never has this issue before. The squirrelmail configuration on this server had
not changed since 4/1/2010, so it is something brought about by the 'svn up' on
last Friday. Moreover, this does not seem to effect every user. I have been back
though the ./conf.pl settings and I have walked users through setting the
squirrelmail 'Options', and I cannot explain why some users are experiencing
this problem.

  I do have multiple CNAMEs that resolve to the original domain, but that has
never been a problem before. This issue seems to effect users that send/receive
mail under a CNAME domain name. Although I also use a CNAME domain and I have
not personally had this issue.

  What can I send you that would help sort this out? What else can I check? I'm
working on getting a copy of one of the emails that is exhibiting this behavior,
but I haven't gotten one yet this morning. I welcome all thoughts on this
matter. Is anybody else seeing this?

-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

--
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
-
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines
List address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users


Re: [SM-USERS] access from intranet

2012-01-09 Thread David C. Rankin
On 01/07/2012 06:24 AM, squirrelma...@fuckaround.org wrote:
> Hi folks! Using squirrelmail from internet everything is ok.
> 
> Using it from intranet, I can't access because my server redirect ip of
> server on dsl ip.
> 
> How can I resolve the problem?
> 
> thanks
> 
> Pol

Pol,

  That sounds like an internal DNS issue rather than a squirrelmail issue. If
you user that access squirrelmail from the internet are able to reach it, but
those on the LAN can't, then you have problems with internal name resolution. It
sounds like your squirrelmail server doesn't know its own fqdn. What does the
/etc/hosts file on the squirrelmail server look like? For internal resolution,
you will want something like this on the squirrelmail server:

127.0.0.1   yourhostname.yourdomain.com localhost yourhostname
::1 yourhostname.yourdomain.com localhost yourhostname
192.168.1.15yourhostname.yourdomain.com yourhostname www mail

  Where yourhostname is the name of the host running squirrelmail. You will need
to change the 192 address to whatever your squirrelmail server address is.

  If you are running BIND as your DNS, then of course you will need both forward
and reverse zone entries for the squirrelmail server.

  Bottom line, your boxes on the LAN can't find your squirrelmail server, but
that has nothing to do with squirrelmail...

P.S. the domain portion of your e-mail address may be offensive to some.

-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

--
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
-
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines
List address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users


Re: [SM-USERS] Reply/Reply All address incorrect after svn update on 1/6/12 (version 14257:14264M)

2012-01-09 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:58 AM, David C. Rankin
 wrote:
> Paul,all
>
>  I have encountered a strange problem in 1.5 after an svn update to svn 
> version
> 14257:14264M on Friday 1/6/12. When a user sends an e-mail that originates in
> squirrelmail, any recipient that attempts to reply (or reply-all) to that
> e-mail, gets an incorrect e-mail address for the original sender inserted into
> the 'To:' field of the reply. (basically '@domain')  It appears that
> squirrelmail is somehow incorrectly inserting  '@domain' into the header 
> instead
> of either (1) the senders e-mail or (2) the specific 'reply-to:' address the
> sender has set in the 'Options/Personal Information' setting.
>
>  When a reply is attempted to a e-mail sent from squirrelmail, it appears that
> the information from:
>
> ./conf.pl -> (2) Server Settings -> (1) Domain
>
> with an '@' prepended is what the person trying to reply to the message sees 
> in
> the 'To:' field after hitting reply?? Basically, when someone hits reply, they
> see '@domain' as the address going back to the original squirrelmail sender. 
> In
> order to successfully reply to messages sent from squirrelmail, those trying 
> to
> reply must manually copy and paste the original senders e-mail into the 'To:'
> field of the reply replacing the '@domain' address.
>
>  This is new behavior in 1.5 as we have used squirrelmail for years and have
> never has this issue before. The squirrelmail configuration on this server had
> not changed since 4/1/2010, so it is something brought about by the 'svn up' 
> on
> last Friday. Moreover, this does not seem to effect every user. I have been 
> back
> though the ./conf.pl settings and I have walked users through setting the
> squirrelmail 'Options', and I cannot explain why some users are 
> experiencing
> this problem.
>
>  I do have multiple CNAMEs that resolve to the original domain, but that has
> never been a problem before. This issue seems to effect users that 
> send/receive
> mail under a CNAME domain name. Although I also use a CNAME domain and I have
> not personally had this issue.
>
>  What can I send you that would help sort this out? What else can I check? I'm
> working on getting a copy of one of the emails that is exhibiting this 
> behavior,
> but I haven't gotten one yet this morning. I welcome all thoughts on this
> matter. Is anybody else seeing this?

Found and fixed.  It will be in the next nightly snapshot or is
available now if you pull from SVN directly.

-- 
Paul Lesniewski
SquirrelMail Team
Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail!
http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php

--
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
-
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines
List address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users


Re: [SM-USERS] Reply/Reply All address incorrect after svn update on 1/6/12 (version 14257:14264M)

2012-01-09 Thread David C. Rankin
On 01/09/2012 02:42 PM, Paul Lesniewski wrote:
> Found and fixed.  It will be in the next nightly snapshot or is
> available now if you pull from SVN directly.

[15:50 phoenix:/srv/http/htdocs/squirrelmail] # svn up
Updating '.':
Usrc/compose.php
Updated to revision 14265.

   Thank you Paul!

-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

--
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
-
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines
List address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users


Re: [SM-USERS] access from intranet

2012-01-09 Thread Noel Butler
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 10:09 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:

> On 01/07/2012 06:24 AM, squirrelma...@fuckaround.org wrote:
> > Hi folks! Using squirrelmail from internet everything is ok.
> > 
> > Using it from intranet, I can't access because my server redirect ip of
> > server on dsl ip.
> > 
> > How can I resolve the problem?



Set up local copy of bind, and use a  "view"




> 127.0.0.1   yourhostname.yourdomain.com localhost yourhostname
> ::1 yourhostname.yourdomain.com localhost yourhostname


Ummm, wrong, you should never use anything but  " localhost.localdomain
localhost"  on loopback addresses



>   If you are running BIND as your DNS, then of course you will need both 
> forward
> and reverse zone entries for the squirrelmail server.
> 


hostname A record is all that is needed in a local view


>   Bottom line, your boxes on the LAN can't find your squirrelmail server, but
> that has nothing to do with squirrelmail...
> 


yep :)


> P.S. the domain portion of your e-mail address may be offensive to some.



Heh, that's likely how I missed his post, not offensive to me, but my
anti spam rules must have nuked his original



<>

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox-
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines
List address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users