[SM-USERS] s/mime - signing possible?

[Friedemann Schorer]

Hi,
I skimmed through the website and didn't find any information if and how
SQ is  capable of _signing_ my messages with S/MIME certs. Did I overlook
something, or is this feature planned for a new release?

Thanks!

Friedemann



---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines: 
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List Archives: 
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

Re: [SM-USERS] s/mime - signing possible?

[Fredrik Jervfors]

> I skimmed through the website and didn't find any information if and how
> SQ is  capable of _signing_ my messages with S/MIME certs. Did I overlook
> something, or is this feature planned for a new release?


See: .

Sincerely,
Fredrik.



---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines: 
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List Archives: 
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

Re: [SM-USERS] s/mime - signing possible?

[Friedemann Schorer]

Hi,

>> I skimmed through the website and didn't find any information if and how
>> SQ is  capable of _signing_ my messages with S/MIME certs. Did I
>> overlook
>> something, or is this feature planned for a new release?
>
>
> See: .

thx.


Friedemann



---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines: 
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List Archives: 
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

Re: [SM-USERS] Charset problem in icelandic? Text is scrambled - not HTML

[Arnór Heiðar]

Ahhh.. beautiful, it's actually partly my fault, I had noticed that 
mambo was forming the headers incorrectly but I didn't know that this 
customer was receiving the e-mail through mambo.


// Btw. asking mambo developers to follow standars is like asking an 
contractor to be on time.


Thanks for all the help, I'll take care of mambo.
Best regards, Arnor

Tomas Kuliavas wrote:


Hi, I'm sorry about following up so late, but the problem is that it is
one of our customers that is having these problems (and propably more of
them, but nobody lets me know (and most are using POP3)).

I've gotten him to give me the complete set of headers (and this is not
easy, giving that he is a normal user).
This is what he got (I've put the whole output through filters to make
sure all the characters don't change):

http://netvistun.is/mail_encoding_problem.php

He says that when he presses the reply button, the characters turn from
questionmarks to the actuall characters.

Any ideas ?
   



http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2045.html
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2047.html

Contact Mambo developers and ask them to follow mime and header encoding
standards.

1. 8bit header information MUST be encoded. RFC 2047.

2. Message MUST have Content-Type header with character set information.
If character set information is missing, interface can't determine which
character set is used. Format is defined in RFC2045.

3. Message MUST have MIME-Version header, because rfc2045 requires this
header.

4. Message MUST have Content-Transfer-Encoding header. Format is defined
in rfc 2045. Default header value is 7bit and your email contains 8bit
text.

We live in a world based on standards. SquirrelMail and your IMAP server
are not the ones that violate message formating standards.

Question marks are added by SquirrelMail US-ASCII decoding function.
functions/decode/us_ascii.php file. I suspect that removal of this script
will fix your issue. Please note that correct solution is to fix Mambo
scripts.

 



--
Arnór Heiðar
Netvistun ehf.
Tæknideild
*ATHUGIÐ AÐ NÚMERIÐ HEFUR BREYST*
Beinn sími: 414-5512
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines: 
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List Archives: 
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

Re: [SM-USERS] Charset problem in icelandic? Text is scrambled - not HTML

[Arnór Heiðar]

Ok, now this is freaking me out.

I've modified the code so it corrects the headers, but it's still the 
same way.


I've got two questions:
1. Why does squirrelmail print it out with ? marks, when e-mail clients 
I've tested (thunderbird & outlook)
2. Why does the text print out incorrectly when viewing e-mails, but 
when you press reply, the text is displayed correctly?


This is the new header information:

|Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:42 +
Received: from nobody by virtual.netvistun.is with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1FbIOC-0004MH-PK
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:41 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Addco ehf Fyrirspurn
From: awreaserrsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Low
Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Mambo Open Source 4.5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:40 +
X-Netvistun-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more 
information

X-Netvistun-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-Netvistun-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=2.465,
required 5, BAYES_00 -2.60, HTML_00_10 0.80, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00,
HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 1.08, HTML_SHORT_LENGTH 1.57,
MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.00, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.61, NO_RELAYS -0.00)
X-Netvistun-MailScanner-SpamScore: ss
X-Netvistun-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Best wishes,
Arnor Heidar
|
Arnór Heiðar wrote:

Ahhh.. beautiful, it's actually partly my fault, I had noticed that 
mambo was forming the headers incorrectly but I didn't know that this 
customer was receiving the e-mail through mambo.


// Btw. asking mambo developers to follow standars is like asking an 
contractor to be on time.


Thanks for all the help, I'll take care of mambo.
Best regards, Arnor

Tomas Kuliavas wrote:


Hi, I'm sorry about following up so late, but the problem is that it is
one of our customers that is having these problems (and propably 
more of

them, but nobody lets me know (and most are using POP3)).

I've gotten him to give me the complete set of headers (and this is not
easy, giving that he is a normal user).
This is what he got (I've put the whole output through filters to make
sure all the characters don't change):

http://netvistun.is/mail_encoding_problem.php

He says that when he presses the reply button, the characters turn from
questionmarks to the actuall characters.

Any ideas ?
  



http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2045.html
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2047.html

Contact Mambo developers and ask them to follow mime and header encoding
standards.

1. 8bit header information MUST be encoded. RFC 2047.

2. Message MUST have Content-Type header with character set information.
If character set information is missing, interface can't determine which
character set is used. Format is defined in RFC2045.

3. Message MUST have MIME-Version header, because rfc2045 requires this
header.

4. Message MUST have Content-Transfer-Encoding header. Format is defined
in rfc 2045. Default header value is 7bit and your email contains 8bit
text.

We live in a world based on standards. SquirrelMail and your IMAP server
are not the ones that violate message formating standards.

Question marks are added by SquirrelMail US-ASCII decoding function.
functions/decode/us_ascii.php file. I suspect that removal of this 
script

will fix your issue. Please note that correct solution is to fix Mambo
scripts.

 





--
Arnór Heiðar
Netvistun ehf.
Tæknideild
*ATHUGIÐ AÐ NÚMERIÐ HEFUR BREYST*
Beinn sími: 414-5512
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines: 
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List Archives: 
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

Re: [SM-USERS] Charset problem in icelandic? Text is scrambled - not HTML

[Arnór Heiðar]

That was supposed to be:
1. Why does squirrelmail print it out with ? marks, when e-mail clients 
I've tested (thunderbird & outlook) output the e-mails with correct letters


Arnór Heiðar wrote:


Ok, now this is freaking me out.

I've modified the code so it corrects the headers, but it's still the 
same way.


I've got two questions:

2. Why does the text print out incorrectly when viewing e-mails, but 
when you press reply, the text is displayed correctly?


This is the new header information:

|Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:42 +
Received: from nobody by virtual.netvistun.is with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1FbIOC-0004MH-PK
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:41 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Addco ehf Fyrirspurn
From: awreaserrsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Low
Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Mambo Open Source 4.5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:40 +
X-Netvistun-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more 
information

X-Netvistun-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-Netvistun-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=2.465,
required 5, BAYES_00 -2.60, HTML_00_10 0.80, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00,
HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 1.08, HTML_SHORT_LENGTH 1.57,
MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.00, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.61, NO_RELAYS -0.00)
X-Netvistun-MailScanner-SpamScore: ss
X-Netvistun-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Best wishes,
Arnor Heidar
|
Arnór Heiðar wrote:

Ahhh.. beautiful, it's actually partly my fault, I had noticed that 
mambo was forming the headers incorrectly but I didn't know that this 
customer was receiving the e-mail through mambo.


// Btw. asking mambo developers to follow standars is like asking an 
contractor to be on time.


Thanks for all the help, I'll take care of mambo.
Best regards, Arnor

Tomas Kuliavas wrote:

Hi, I'm sorry about following up so late, but the problem is that 
it is
one of our customers that is having these problems (and propably 
more of

them, but nobody lets me know (and most are using POP3)).

I've gotten him to give me the complete set of headers (and this is 
not

easy, giving that he is a normal user).
This is what he got (I've put the whole output through filters to make
sure all the characters don't change):

http://netvistun.is/mail_encoding_problem.php

He says that when he presses the reply button, the characters turn 
from

questionmarks to the actuall characters.

Any ideas ?
  




http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2045.html
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2047.html

Contact Mambo developers and ask them to follow mime and header 
encoding

standards.

1. 8bit header information MUST be encoded. RFC 2047.

2. Message MUST have Content-Type header with character set 
information.
If character set information is missing, interface can't determine 
which

character set is used. Format is defined in RFC2045.

3. Message MUST have MIME-Version header, because rfc2045 requires this
header.

4. Message MUST have Content-Transfer-Encoding header. Format is 
defined

in rfc 2045. Default header value is 7bit and your email contains 8bit
text.

We live in a world based on standards. SquirrelMail and your IMAP 
server

are not the ones that violate message formating standards.

Question marks are added by SquirrelMail US-ASCII decoding function.
functions/decode/us_ascii.php file. I suspect that removal of this 
script

will fix your issue. Please note that correct solution is to fix Mambo
scripts.

 







--
Arnór Heiðar
Netvistun ehf.
Tæknideild
*ATHUGIÐ AÐ NÚMERIÐ HEFUR BREYST*
Beinn sími: 414-5512
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines: 
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List Archives: 
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

[SM-USERS] Attach filesize still a problem...

[maillists]

Hi,

I am still having a problem setting the filesize on attachments. Right
now it is fixed a 2MB, I would like to increase it to 5MB. My php.ini is
fine (I use gallery and people can upload 10MB files!) I must be missing
something. Does anybody know how to set this?

Thanks
Rick


---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines: 
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List Archives: 
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

[SM-USERS] Strange behavior with an attachment.

[J Adams]

A user attaches a file in SquirrelMail. It shows up in the compose
window and it seems to attach correctly but, after sending, the
attachment is no longer there. It appears in the sent fold as
"untitled-[1]  0 k   [ multipart/alternative ]"



I have several reports of this behavior from users, but I haven't been able to reproduce it.

My first thought was that this is not a squirrelmail issue (and I'm still skeptical), but I need to rule it out. 
I don't see any other common denominators among these users. 




SquirrelMail 1.4.2

php 4.3.6

FreeBSD 5.x

Apache 1.3

courier-imap



Thanks. 

Re: [SM-USERS] Attach filesize still a problem...

[Arnór Heiðar]

Hi Rick

Do you know if the file-upload itself was a success?

Br, Arnor

maillists wrote:


Hi,

I am still having a problem setting the filesize on attachments. Right
now it is fixed a 2MB, I would like to increase it to 5MB. My php.ini is
fine (I use gallery and people can upload 10MB files!) I must be missing
something. Does anybody know how to set this?

Thanks
Rick


---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines: 
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List Archives: 
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users



 



--
Arnór Heiðar
Netvistun ehf.
Tæknideild
*ATHUGIÐ AÐ NÚMERIÐ HEFUR BREYST*
Beinn sími: 414-5512
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines: 
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List Archives: 
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

Re: [SM-USERS] Strange behavior with an attachment.

[Matt Ruzicka]

Hmm.. That's really interesting because we have had similar reports.

Here are our specs:

SquirrelMail 1.4.6
FreeBSD 4.x
Apache 2.2.x
PHP 5.1.x
Courier-IMAP

It has been a while since I looked into this, but I seem to remember my 
testing indicated it was the result of certain mailer scripts or clients 
not adding a name or filename label to the Content-Type or 
Content-Disposition headers. Although other clients such as OE and 
Thunderbird handled them properly I sort of assumed they were just 
"fixing" the broken formatting, where as SM was maybe truer to RFC.  I 
could be off base on that assumption though. I seem to remember that if I 
manually edited the mail file and added those labels I believe the 
attachments would be handled as expected.  This lead me to believe it was 
how the original message was being broken apart then re-attached that 
might be the problem.  We discovered that if the user just forwarded as 
attachment (which I understand other web clients like yahoo and hotmail do 
by default) everything forwarded fine.


Either way it was primarily affecting one user that was receiving mail 
from a FAX service that was adding a 'X-Mailer: Mabry' header so we told 
them to just forward as attachment.


If this could be "fixed" that would be great as well, but unless someone 
who understands mail RFC better than I do indicates otherwise, I'm not 
sure SM is actually going anything "wrong".


Matthew Ruzicka - Systems Administrator
Front Range Internet, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (970) 212-0728

Got SPAM?  Take back your email with MailArmory.  http://www.MailArmory.com

On Wed, 3 May 2006, J Adams wrote:


A user attaches a file in SquirrelMail. It shows up in the compose window
and it seems to attach correctly but, after sending, the attachment is no
longer there. It appears in the sent fold as "untitled-[1]  0 k   [
multipart/alternative ]"

I have several reports of this behavior from users, but I haven't been able
to reproduce it.
My first thought was that this is not a squirrelmail issue (and I'm still
skeptical), but I need to rule it out. I don't see any other common
denominators among these users.

SquirrelMail 1.4.2
php 4.3.6
FreeBSD 5.x
Apache 1.3
courier-imap

Thanks.




---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines: 
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List Archives: 
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

Re: [SM-USERS] Charset problem in icelandic? Text is scrambled - not HTML

[Tomas Kuliavas]

"3. Message MUST have MIME-Version header, because rfc2045 requires this
header."

RFC 2045 chapter 4.

> Ok, now this is freaking me out.
>
> I've modified the code so it corrects the headers, but it's still the
> same way.
>
> I've got two questions:
> 1. Why does squirrelmail print it out with ? marks, when e-mail clients
> I've tested (thunderbird & outlook)
> 2. Why does the text print out incorrectly when viewing e-mails, but
> when you press reply, the text is displayed correctly?
>
> This is the new header information:
>
> |Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Delivery-date: Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:42 +
> Received: from nobody by virtual.netvistun.is with local (Exim 4.52)
> id 1FbIOC-0004MH-PK
> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:41 +
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Addco ehf Fyrirspurn
> From: awreaserrsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Low
> Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-Mailer: Mambo Open Source 4.5
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:40 +
> X-Netvistun-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
> information
> X-Netvistun-MailScanner: Found to be clean
> X-Netvistun-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=2.465,
> required 5, BAYES_00 -2.60, HTML_00_10 0.80, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00,
> HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 1.08, HTML_SHORT_LENGTH 1.57,
> MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.00, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.61, NO_RELAYS -0.00)
> X-Netvistun-MailScanner-SpamScore: ss
> X-Netvistun-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Best wishes,
> Arnor Heidar
> |
> Arnór Heiðar wrote:
>
>> Ahhh.. beautiful, it's actually partly my fault, I had noticed that
>> mambo was forming the headers incorrectly but I didn't know that this
>> customer was receiving the e-mail through mambo.
>>
>> // Btw. asking mambo developers to follow standars is like asking an
>> contractor to be on time.
>>
>> Thanks for all the help, I'll take care of mambo.
>> Best regards, Arnor
>>
>> Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
>>
 Hi, I'm sorry about following up so late, but the problem is that it
 is
 one of our customers that is having these problems (and propably
 more of
 them, but nobody lets me know (and most are using POP3)).

 I've gotten him to give me the complete set of headers (and this is
 not
 easy, giving that he is a normal user).
 This is what he got (I've put the whole output through filters to make
 sure all the characters don't change):

 http://netvistun.is/mail_encoding_problem.php

 He says that when he presses the reply button, the characters turn
 from
 questionmarks to the actuall characters.

 Any ideas ?

>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2045.html
>>> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2047.html
>>>
>>> Contact Mambo developers and ask them to follow mime and header
>>> encoding
>>> standards.
>>>
>>> 1. 8bit header information MUST be encoded. RFC 2047.
>>>
>>> 2. Message MUST have Content-Type header with character set
>>> information.
>>> If character set information is missing, interface can't determine
>>> which
>>> character set is used. Format is defined in RFC2045.
>>>
>>> 3. Message MUST have MIME-Version header, because rfc2045 requires this
>>> header.
>>>
>>> 4. Message MUST have Content-Transfer-Encoding header. Format is
>>> defined
>>> in rfc 2045. Default header value is 7bit and your email contains 8bit
>>> text.
>>>
>>> We live in a world based on standards. SquirrelMail and your IMAP
>>> server
>>> are not the ones that violate message formating standards.
>>>
>>> Question marks are added by SquirrelMail US-ASCII decoding function.
>>> functions/decode/us_ascii.php file. I suspect that removal of this
>>> script
>>> will fix your issue. Please note that correct solution is to fix Mambo
>>> scripts.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Arnór Heiðar
> Netvistun ehf.
> Tæknideild
> *ATHUGIÐ AÐ NÚMERIÐ HEFUR BREYST*
> Beinn sími: 414-5512
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> ---
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
> --
> squirrelmail-users mailing list
> Posting Guidelines:
> http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines
> List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> List Archives:
> http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
> List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95
> List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
>



---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, sec

Re: [SM-USERS] Charset problem in icelandic? Text is scrambled - not HTML

[Tomas Kuliavas]

In thunderbird and outlook default character set is set in configuration.
In SquirrelMail and any other imap program, that depends on information
provided by IMAP server, default email character set is always US-ASCII.

> That was supposed to be:
> 1. Why does squirrelmail print it out with ? marks, when e-mail clients
> I've tested (thunderbird & outlook) output the e-mails with correct
> letters
>
> Arnór Heiðar wrote:
>
>> Ok, now this is freaking me out.
>>
>> I've modified the code so it corrects the headers, but it's still the
>> same way.
>>
>> I've got two questions:
>>
>> 2. Why does the text print out incorrectly when viewing e-mails, but
>> when you press reply, the text is displayed correctly?
>>
>> This is the new header information:
>>
>> |Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Delivery-date: Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:42 +
>> Received: from nobody by virtual.netvistun.is with local (Exim 4.52)
>> id 1FbIOC-0004MH-PK
>> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:41 +
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Addco ehf Fyrirspurn
>> From: awreaserrsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> X-Priority: 3
>> X-MSMail-Priority: Low
>> Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>> X-Mailer: Mambo Open Source 4.5
>> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:40 +
>> X-Netvistun-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
>> information
>> X-Netvistun-MailScanner: Found to be clean
>> X-Netvistun-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=2.465,
>> required 5, BAYES_00 -2.60, HTML_00_10 0.80, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00,
>> HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 1.08, HTML_SHORT_LENGTH 1.57,
>> MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.00, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.61, NO_RELAYS -0.00)
>> X-Netvistun-MailScanner-SpamScore: ss
>> X-Netvistun-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Arnor Heidar
>> |
>> Arnór Heiðar wrote:
>>
>>> Ahhh.. beautiful, it's actually partly my fault, I had noticed that
>>> mambo was forming the headers incorrectly but I didn't know that this
>>> customer was receiving the e-mail through mambo.
>>>
>>> // Btw. asking mambo developers to follow standars is like asking an
>>> contractor to be on time.
>>>
>>> Thanks for all the help, I'll take care of mambo.
>>> Best regards, Arnor
>>>
>>> Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
>>>
> Hi, I'm sorry about following up so late, but the problem is that
> it is
> one of our customers that is having these problems (and propably
> more of
> them, but nobody lets me know (and most are using POP3)).
>
> I've gotten him to give me the complete set of headers (and this is
> not
> easy, giving that he is a normal user).
> This is what he got (I've put the whole output through filters to
> make
> sure all the characters don't change):
>
> http://netvistun.is/mail_encoding_problem.php
>
> He says that when he presses the reply button, the characters turn
> from
> questionmarks to the actuall characters.
>
> Any ideas ?
>



 http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2045.html
 http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2047.html

 Contact Mambo developers and ask them to follow mime and header
 encoding
 standards.

 1. 8bit header information MUST be encoded. RFC 2047.

 2. Message MUST have Content-Type header with character set
 information.
 If character set information is missing, interface can't determine
 which
 character set is used. Format is defined in RFC2045.

 3. Message MUST have MIME-Version header, because rfc2045 requires
 this
 header.

 4. Message MUST have Content-Transfer-Encoding header. Format is
 defined
 in rfc 2045. Default header value is 7bit and your email contains 8bit
 text.

 We live in a world based on standards. SquirrelMail and your IMAP
 server
 are not the ones that violate message formating standards.

 Question marks are added by SquirrelMail US-ASCII decoding function.
 functions/decode/us_ascii.php file. I suspect that removal of this
 script
 will fix your issue. Please note that correct solution is to fix Mambo
 scripts.



>>>
>>
>
> --
> Arnór Heiðar
> Netvistun ehf.
> Tæknideild
> *ATHUGIÐ AÐ NÚMERIÐ HEFUR BREYST*
> Beinn sími: 414-5512
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> ---
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
> --
> squirrelmail-users mailing list
> Posting Guidelines:
> http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines
> List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> List Archives:
> ht

Re: [SM-USERS] Attach filesize still a problem...

[maillists]

On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 15:13 +, Arnór Heiðar wrote:
> Hi Rick
> 
> Do you know if the file-upload itself was a success?
> 
> Br, Arnor
> 
> maillists wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >I am still having a problem setting the filesize on attachments. Right
> >now it is fixed a 2MB, I would like to increase it to 5MB. My php.ini is
> >fine (I use gallery and people can upload 10MB files!) I must be missing
> >something. Does anybody know how to set this?
> >
> >Thanks
> >Rick
> >

Yes, attachments do work fine under 2MB. and when I use gallery (a php
program) file uploads work fine up to 10MB. But for some reason,
squirrelmail limits attachments to 2MB... When I attach files larger
than 2MB, the email goes through but without the attachment.

I'm not sure where to fix this.
(Sorry for the reply to you Arnór , I ment to reply to this list...)

Thanks
Rick


---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines: 
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List Archives: 
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

Re: [SM-USERS] Charset problem in icelandic? Text is scrambled - not HTML

[Arnór Heiðar]

And that's a feature not a bug, right ?
:)

Tomas Kuliavas wrote:


In thunderbird and outlook default character set is set in configuration.
In SquirrelMail and any other imap program, that depends on information
provided by IMAP server, default email character set is always US-ASCII.

 


That was supposed to be:
1. Why does squirrelmail print it out with ? marks, when e-mail clients
I've tested (thunderbird & outlook) output the e-mails with correct
letters

Arnór Heiðar wrote:

   


Ok, now this is freaking me out.

I've modified the code so it corrects the headers, but it's still the
same way.

I've got two questions:

2. Why does the text print out incorrectly when viewing e-mails, but
when you press reply, the text is displayed correctly?

This is the new header information:

|Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:42 +
Received: from nobody by virtual.netvistun.is with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1FbIOC-0004MH-PK
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:41 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Addco ehf Fyrirspurn
From: awreaserrsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Low
Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Mambo Open Source 4.5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:40 +
X-Netvistun-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
information
X-Netvistun-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-Netvistun-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=2.465,
required 5, BAYES_00 -2.60, HTML_00_10 0.80, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00,
HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 1.08, HTML_SHORT_LENGTH 1.57,
MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.00, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.61, NO_RELAYS -0.00)
X-Netvistun-MailScanner-SpamScore: ss
X-Netvistun-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Best wishes,
Arnor Heidar
|
Arnór Heiðar wrote:

 


Ahhh.. beautiful, it's actually partly my fault, I had noticed that
mambo was forming the headers incorrectly but I didn't know that this
customer was receiving the e-mail through mambo.

// Btw. asking mambo developers to follow standars is like asking an
contractor to be on time.

Thanks for all the help, I'll take care of mambo.
Best regards, Arnor

Tomas Kuliavas wrote:

   


Hi, I'm sorry about following up so late, but the problem is that
it is
one of our customers that is having these problems (and propably
more of
them, but nobody lets me know (and most are using POP3)).

I've gotten him to give me the complete set of headers (and this is
not
easy, giving that he is a normal user).
This is what he got (I've put the whole output through filters to
make
sure all the characters don't change):

http://netvistun.is/mail_encoding_problem.php

He says that when he presses the reply button, the characters turn
from
questionmarks to the actuall characters.

Any ideas ?

   



http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2045.html
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2047.html

Contact Mambo developers and ask them to follow mime and header
encoding
standards.

1. 8bit header information MUST be encoded. RFC 2047.

2. Message MUST have Content-Type header with character set
information.
If character set information is missing, interface can't determine
which
character set is used. Format is defined in RFC2045.

3. Message MUST have MIME-Version header, because rfc2045 requires
this
header.

4. Message MUST have Content-Transfer-Encoding header. Format is
defined
in rfc 2045. Default header value is 7bit and your email contains 8bit
text.

We live in a world based on standards. SquirrelMail and your IMAP
server
are not the ones that violate message formating standards.

Question marks are added by SquirrelMail US-ASCII decoding function.
functions/decode/us_ascii.php file. I suspect that removal of this
script
will fix your issue. Please note that correct solution is to fix Mambo
scripts.



 


--
Arnór Heiðar
Netvistun ehf.
Tæknideild
*ATHUGIÐ AÐ NÚMERIÐ HEFUR BREYST*
Beinn sími: 414-5512
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines:
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List Archives:
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

   





---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make

Re: [SM-USERS] Charset problem in icelandic? Text is scrambled - not HTML

[Arnór Heiðar]

You know what Tomas, you're a genius... That WORKED!
:)

Thank you very much

Tomas Kuliavas wrote:


"3. Message MUST have MIME-Version header, because rfc2045 requires this
header."

RFC 2045 chapter 4.

 


Ok, now this is freaking me out.

I've modified the code so it corrects the headers, but it's still the
same way.

I've got two questions:
1. Why does squirrelmail print it out with ? marks, when e-mail clients
I've tested (thunderbird & outlook)
2. Why does the text print out incorrectly when viewing e-mails, but
when you press reply, the text is displayed correctly?

This is the new header information:

|Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:42 +
Received: from nobody by virtual.netvistun.is with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1FbIOC-0004MH-PK
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:41 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Addco ehf Fyrirspurn
From: awreaserrsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Low
Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Mambo Open Source 4.5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:40 +
X-Netvistun-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
information
X-Netvistun-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-Netvistun-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=2.465,
required 5, BAYES_00 -2.60, HTML_00_10 0.80, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00,
HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 1.08, HTML_SHORT_LENGTH 1.57,
MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.00, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.61, NO_RELAYS -0.00)
X-Netvistun-MailScanner-SpamScore: ss
X-Netvistun-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Best wishes,
Arnor Heidar
|
Arnór Heiðar wrote:

   


Ahhh.. beautiful, it's actually partly my fault, I had noticed that
mambo was forming the headers incorrectly but I didn't know that this
customer was receiving the e-mail through mambo.

// Btw. asking mambo developers to follow standars is like asking an
contractor to be on time.

Thanks for all the help, I'll take care of mambo.
Best regards, Arnor

Tomas Kuliavas wrote:

 


Hi, I'm sorry about following up so late, but the problem is that it
is
one of our customers that is having these problems (and propably
more of
them, but nobody lets me know (and most are using POP3)).

I've gotten him to give me the complete set of headers (and this is
not
easy, giving that he is a normal user).
This is what he got (I've put the whole output through filters to make
sure all the characters don't change):

http://netvistun.is/mail_encoding_problem.php

He says that when he presses the reply button, the characters turn
from
questionmarks to the actuall characters.

Any ideas ?

 


http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2045.html
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2047.html

Contact Mambo developers and ask them to follow mime and header
encoding
standards.

1. 8bit header information MUST be encoded. RFC 2047.

2. Message MUST have Content-Type header with character set
information.
If character set information is missing, interface can't determine
which
character set is used. Format is defined in RFC2045.

3. Message MUST have MIME-Version header, because rfc2045 requires this
header.

4. Message MUST have Content-Transfer-Encoding header. Format is
defined
in rfc 2045. Default header value is 7bit and your email contains 8bit
text.

We live in a world based on standards. SquirrelMail and your IMAP
server
are not the ones that violate message formating standards.

Question marks are added by SquirrelMail US-ASCII decoding function.
functions/decode/us_ascii.php file. I suspect that removal of this
script
will fix your issue. Please note that correct solution is to fix Mambo
scripts.



   


--
Arnór Heiðar
Netvistun ehf.
Tæknideild
*ATHUGIÐ AÐ NÚMERIÐ HEFUR BREYST*
Beinn sími: 414-5512
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines:
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List Archives:
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

   





---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
--
squirrelmail-user

Re: [SM-USERS] Strange behavior with an attachment.

[Alex Ng]

SquirrelMail 1.4.2
Courier-IMAP FreeBSD 6.xPHP 5.1.xApache 1.3
I had this issue a while back, but was unable to resolve it.  Problem still persists for my users.What I noticed is that some Content-type that comes into our system is interpretted (correctly), by SM and I am able to view/download the attachment.  However, if I try to forward this message (BOTH as regular forward and forward as attachment)... the message is sent with the "untitled-[1]  0 k   [ multipart/alternative ]" attachment.  I can see this in my Sent folder, as well as on the recepient's mailbox (on the same system).  
The recepient is unable to view/download the attachment, nor am I able to view/download the attachment from my Sent folder.  However, as noted by Matthew Ruzicka, is viewable/downloadable in a standard client such as Mozilla Thunderbird or MS Outlook.
A particular instance, adding to what Matthew said, is when one of my users sent a PDF file from another system.  SM recognized the attachment, and showed me it as "[ application/octet-stream ]".  I am able to download this file correctly.  If I compose a new message and attach the same file, SM will note it as being "[ application/pdf ]", which is more appropriate.
The problem in this situation lies when I try to forward the "[ application/octet-stream ]".  When I forward it, my Sent folder will show the untitled 0k and the recepient of the message (on the same system) will see the untitled 0k as well in SM.
This may have something to do with how SM handles the converting of the octet-stream content type.Is there something I can modify to the SM code to alieviate the issue?Thank you.-Alex
On 5/3/06, Matt Ruzicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm.. That's really interesting because we have had similar reports.Here are our specs:SquirrelMail 1.4.6FreeBSD 4.xApache 2.2.xPHP 5.1.xCourier-IMAPIt has been a while since I looked into this, but I seem to remember my
testing indicated it was the result of certain mailer scripts or clientsnot adding a name or filename label to the Content-Type orContent-Disposition headers. Although other clients such as OE andThunderbird handled them properly I sort of assumed they were just
"fixing" the broken formatting, where as SM was maybe truer to RFC.  Icould be off base on that assumption though. I seem to remember that if Imanually edited the mail file and added those labels I believe the
attachments would be handled as expected.  This lead me to believe it washow the original message was being broken apart then re-attached thatmight be the problem.  We discovered that if the user just forwarded as
attachment (which I understand other web clients like yahoo and hotmail doby default) everything forwarded fine.Either way it was primarily affecting one user that was receiving mailfrom a FAX service that was adding a 'X-Mailer: Mabry' header so we told
them to just forward as attachment.If this could be "fixed" that would be great as well, but unless someonewho understands mail RFC better than I do indicates otherwise, I'm notsure SM is actually going anything "wrong".
Matthew Ruzicka - Systems AdministratorFront Range Internet, Inc.[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (970) 212-0728Got SPAM?  Take back your email with MailArmory.  
http://www.MailArmory.comOn Wed, 3 May 2006, J Adams wrote:> A user attaches a file in SquirrelMail. It shows up in the compose window> and it seems to attach correctly but, after sending, the attachment is no
> longer there. It appears in the sent fold as "untitled-[1]  0 k   [> multipart/alternative ]">> I have several reports of this behavior from users, but I haven't been able> to reproduce it.
> My first thought was that this is not a squirrelmail issue (and I'm still> skeptical), but I need to rule it out. I don't see any other common> denominators among these users.>> SquirrelMail 
1.4.2> php 4.3.6> FreeBSD 5.x> Apache 1.3> courier-imap>> Thanks.>---Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easierDownload IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642--squirrelmail-users mailing listPosting Guidelines: 
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelinesList Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.netList Archives: 
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.userList Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

Re: [SM-USERS] Strange behavior with an attachment.

[J Adams]

SquirrelMail 1.4.2

Courier-IMAP 
FreeBSD 6.x
PHP 5.1.x
Apache 1.3


I had this issue a while back, but was unable to resolve it.  Problem still persists for my users.

What
I noticed is that some Content-type that comes into our system is
interpretted (correctly), by SM and I am able to view/download the
attachment.  However, if I try to forward this message (BOTH as regular
forward and forward as attachment)... the message is sent with the
"untitled-[1]  0 k   [ multipart/alternative ]" attachment.  I can see
this in my Sent folder, as well as on the recepient's mailbox (on the
same system).  

The recepient is unable to view/download the attachment, nor
am I able to view/download the attachment from my Sent folder. 
However, as noted by Matthew Ruzicka, is viewable/downloadable in a
standard client such as Mozilla Thunderbird or MS Outlook.


A particular instance, adding to what Matthew said, is when
one of my users sent a PDF file from another system.  SM recognized the
attachment, and showed me it as "[ application/octet-stream ]".  I am
able to download this file correctly.  If I compose a new message and
attach the same file, SM will note it as being "[ application/pdf ]",
which is more appropriate.


The problem in this situation lies when I try to forward the
"[ application/octet-stream ]".  When I forward it, my Sent folder will
show the untitled 0k and the recepient of the message (on the same
system) will see the untitled 0k as well in SM.


This may have something to do with how SM handles the converting of the octet-stream content type.

Is there something I can modify to the SM code to alieviate the issue?

Thank you.
-Alex


On 5/3/06, Matt Ruzicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm.. That's really interesting because we have had similar reports.

Here are our specs:

SquirrelMail 1.4.6
FreeBSD 4.x
Apache 2.2.x
PHP 5.1.x
Courier-IMAP

It has been a while since I looked into this, but I seem to remember my

testing indicated it was the result of certain mailer scripts or clients
not adding a name or filename label to the Content-Type or
Content-Disposition headers. Although other clients such as OE and
Thunderbird handled them properly I sort of assumed they were just

"fixing" the broken formatting, where as SM was maybe truer to RFC.  I
could be off base on that assumption though. I seem to remember that if I
manually edited the mail file and added those labels I believe the

attachments would be handled as expected.  This lead me to believe it was
how the original message was being broken apart then re-attached that
might be the problem.  We discovered that if the user just forwarded as

attachment (which I understand other web clients like yahoo and hotmail do
by default) everything forwarded fine.

Either way it was primarily affecting one user that was receiving mail
from a FAX service that was adding a 'X-Mailer: Mabry' header so we told

them to just forward as attachment.

If this could be "fixed" that would be great as well, but unless someone
who understands mail RFC better than I do indicates otherwise, I'm not
sure SM is actually going anything "wrong".


Matthew Ruzicka - Systems Administrator
Front Range Internet, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - (970) 212-0728

Got SPAM?  Take back your email with MailArmory.  
http://www.MailArmory.com

On Wed, 3 May 2006, J Adams wrote:

> A user attaches a file in SquirrelMail. It shows up in the compose window
> and it seems to attach correctly but, after sending, the attachment is no

> longer there. It appears in the sent fold as "untitled-[1]  0 k   [
> multipart/alternative ]"
>
> I have several reports of this behavior from users, but I haven't been able
> to reproduce it.

> My first thought was that this is not a squirrelmail issue (and I'm still
> skeptical), but I need to rule it out. I don't see any other common
> denominators among these users.
>
> SquirrelMail 
1.4.2
> php 4.3.6
> FreeBSD 5.x
> Apache 1.3
> courier-imap
>
> Thanks.
>

I can reproduce this behavior by setting the "default email composition
format" to HTML in Options -> Display Preferences. Changing that
setting to "plain text" clears it up. 

Is this a known issue? Is there something we can do about this?

Re: [SM-USERS] Charset problem in icelandic? Text is scrambled - not HTML

[Tomas Kuliavas]

Same rfc2045

5.2.  Content-Type Defaults

   Default RFC 822 messages without a MIME Content-Type header are taken
   by this protocol to be plain text in the US-ASCII character set,
   which can be explicitly specified as:

 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

   This default is assumed if no Content-Type header field is specified.
   It is also recommend that this default be assumed when a
   syntactically invalid Content-Type header field is encountered. In
   the presence of a MIME-Version header field and the absence of any
   Content-Type header field, a receiving User Agent can also assume
   that plain US-ASCII text was the sender's intent.  Plain US-ASCII
   text may still be assumed in the absence of a MIME-Version or the
   presence of an syntactically invalid Content-Type header field, but
   the sender's intent might have been otherwise.


It is the standard.

Some IMAP servers will fails to parse messages, if sender violates MIME
formating standards. Some SMTP servers will corrupt broken messages. Any
sane MIME parser will follow rfc, because standard offers optimal message
structure parsing way.

> And that's a feature not a bug, right ?
> :)
>
> Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
>
>>In thunderbird and outlook default character set is set in configuration.
>>In SquirrelMail and any other imap program, that depends on information
>>provided by IMAP server, default email character set is always US-ASCII.
>>
>>
>>
>>>That was supposed to be:
>>>1. Why does squirrelmail print it out with ? marks, when e-mail clients
>>>I've tested (thunderbird & outlook) output the e-mails with correct
>>>letters
>>>
>>>Arnór Heiðar wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Ok, now this is freaking me out.

I've modified the code so it corrects the headers, but it's still the
same way.

I've got two questions:

2. Why does the text print out incorrectly when viewing e-mails, but
when you press reply, the text is displayed correctly?

This is the new header information:

|Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:42 +
Received: from nobody by virtual.netvistun.is with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1FbIOC-0004MH-PK
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:41 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Addco ehf Fyrirspurn
From: awreaserrsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Low
Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Mambo Open Source 4.5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 14:31:40 +
X-Netvistun-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
information
X-Netvistun-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-Netvistun-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=2.465,
required 5, BAYES_00 -2.60, HTML_00_10 0.80, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00,
HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 1.08, HTML_SHORT_LENGTH 1.57,
MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.00, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.61, NO_RELAYS -0.00)
X-Netvistun-MailScanner-SpamScore: ss
X-Netvistun-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Best wishes,
Arnor Heidar
|
Arnór Heiðar wrote:



>Ahhh.. beautiful, it's actually partly my fault, I had noticed that
>mambo was forming the headers incorrectly but I didn't know that this
>customer was receiving the e-mail through mambo.
>
>// Btw. asking mambo developers to follow standars is like asking an
>contractor to be on time.
>
>Thanks for all the help, I'll take care of mambo.
>Best regards, Arnor
>
>Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
>
>
>
>>>Hi, I'm sorry about following up so late, but the problem is that
>>>it is
>>>one of our customers that is having these problems (and propably
>>>more of
>>>them, but nobody lets me know (and most are using POP3)).
>>>
>>>I've gotten him to give me the complete set of headers (and this is
>>>not
>>>easy, giving that he is a normal user).
>>>This is what he got (I've put the whole output through filters to
>>>make
>>>sure all the characters don't change):
>>>
>>>http://netvistun.is/mail_encoding_problem.php
>>>
>>>He says that when he presses the reply button, the characters turn
>>>from
>>>questionmarks to the actuall characters.
>>>
>>>Any ideas ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2045.html
>>http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2047.html
>>
>>Contact Mambo developers and ask them to follow mime and header
>>encoding
>>standards.
>>
>>1. 8bit header information MUST be encoded. RFC 2047.
>>
>>2. Message MUST have Content-Type header with character set
>>information.
>>If character set information is missing, interface can't determine
>>which
>>character set is used. Format is defined in RFC2045.
>>
>

Re: [SM-USERS] Attach filesize still a problem...

[Fredrik Jervfors]

>>> I am still having a problem setting the filesize on attachments.
>>> Right now it is fixed a 2MB, I would like to increase it to 5MB. My
>>> php.ini is fine (I use gallery and people can upload 10MB files!) I
>>> must be missing something. Does anybody know how to set this?
>>
>> Do you know if the file-upload itself was a success?
>
> Yes, attachments do work fine under 2MB. and when I use gallery (a php
> program) file uploads work fine up to 10MB. But for some reason,
> squirrelmail limits attachments to 2MB... When I attach files larger than
> 2MB, the email goes through but without the attachment.
>
> I'm not sure where to fix this.

Did you read the FAQ and tried the suggestions in it?

Sincerely,
Fredrik.



---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines: 
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List Archives: 
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

Re: [SM-USERS] Attach filesize still a problem...

[Fredrik Jervfors]

 I am still having a problem setting the filesize on attachments.
 Right now it is fixed a 2MB, I would like to increase it to 5MB. My
 php.ini is fine (I use gallery and people can upload 10MB files!) I
 must be missing something. Does anybody know how to set this?
>>>
>>> Do you know if the file-upload itself was a success?
>>
>> Yes, attachments do work fine under 2MB. and when I use gallery (a php
>> program) file uploads work fine up to 10MB. But for some reason,
>> squirrelmail limits attachments to 2MB... When I attach files larger
>> than 2MB, the email goes through but without the attachment.
>>
>> I'm not sure where to fix this.
>
> Did you read the FAQ and tried the suggestions in it?

Sorry, I forgot the link: .

Sincerely,
Fredrik.



---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines: 
http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List Archives: 
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

[SM-USERS] Re: Read Messages Not Unread After Back

[Keefe John]

Sorry about that, there was a slight typo in that statement.

After viewing an UNREAD message and hitting the back button the message
STILL appears as UNREAD.

Keefe

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 10:14 AM
To: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: squirrelmail-users digest, Vol 1 #3366 - 14 msgs

Send squirrelmail-users mailing list submissions to
squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of squirrelmail-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Read Messages Not Unread After Back (Keefe John)
   2. Re: Read Messages Not Unread After Back (Fredrik Jervfors)
   3. s/mime - signing possible? (Friedemann Schorer)
   4. Re: s/mime - signing possible? (Fredrik Jervfors)
   5. Re: s/mime - signing possible? (Friedemann Schorer)
   6. Re: Charset problem in icelandic? Text is scrambled -
   not HTML (=?UTF-8?B?QXJuw7NyIEhlacOwYXI=?=)
   7. Re: Charset problem in icelandic? Text is scrambled -
   not HTML (=?UTF-8?B?QXJuw7NyIEhlacOwYXI=?=)
   8. Re: Charset problem in icelandic? Text is scrambled -
   not HTML (=?UTF-8?B?QXJuw7NyIEhlacOwYXI=?=)
   9. Attach filesize still a problem... (maillists)
  10. Strange behavior with an attachment. (J Adams)
  11. Re: Attach filesize still a problem...
(=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Arn=F3r_Hei=F0ar?=)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: "Keefe John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 23:36:31 -0500
Subject: [SM-USERS] Read Messages Not Unread After Back

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--=_NextPart_000_0173_01C66E41.3E7FF2A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I've noticed a few odd things happending in squirrelmail with dovecot. These
aren't major issues, but its annoying enough to be fixed.

1) After viewing an unread message and hitting "back" the message won't show
as unread.

or sometimes

2) After viewing an unread message and hitting "back" the wrong message is
changed from unread to read. Generally this happens to one message before
it.

Note: I *think* this only happens on pages greater than 1 in squrrelmail.
 
I'm running sqmail 1.6.4, exim, apache 1.x, and dovecot.

Has anyone else experienced this?

Keefe

--=_NextPart_000_0173_01C66E41.3E7FF2A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 

 
I've noticed a few odd things =
happending in=20 squirrelmail with
dovecot. These = aren't=20 major issues, but its annoying enough to
be fixed.1) After = viewing an=20 unread message and hitting "back"
the message won't show as = unread.or=20
sometimes2) After viewing an unread message and hitting "back" = the
wrong=20 message is changed from unread to read. Generally this happens to
one = message=20 before it.Note: I *think* this only happens on
pages greater = than 1 in=20 squrrelmail.   I'm running=20
sqmail 1.6.4, exim, apache 1.x, and dovecot.Has anyone else experienced=20
this?Keefe

--=_NextPart_000_0173_01C66E41.3E7FF2A0--



--__--__--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 06:53:50 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Read Messages Not Unread After Back
From: "Fredrik Jervfors" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: squirrelmail-users@lists.sourceforge.net

> I've noticed a few odd things happending in squirrelmail with dovecot.
> These aren't major issues, but its annoying enough to be fixed.
>
> 1) After viewing an unread message and hitting "back" the message 
> won't show as unread.
>
> or sometimes
>
> 2) After viewing an unread message and hitting "back" the wrong 
> message is changed from unread to read. Generally this happens to one 
> message before it.
>
> Note: I *think* this only happens on pages greater than 1 in squrrelmail.
>
> I'm running sqmail 1.6.4, exim, apache 1.x, and dovecot.


If you read a paper when walking and then suddenly walk backwards, you won't
forget what you read. When you read a mail using SquirrelMail, SquirrelMail
tells the IMAP server to change the flag at the server from unread to read.
Next time you look at the message list, the mail will show up as read. As
far as I can tell, that's the expected behaviour.

If the wrong mail is marked as read, something is fishy. Which versions are
you using. I assume that you mean SquirrelMail 1.4.6 (sqmail is another
client, so if you really use sqmail you're at the wrong mailing list), but
what's Dovecot's version number?

Sincerely,
Fredrik.



--__--__--

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 12:23:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Friedemann Schorer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: squirrelmail-use