[SM-USERS] frequent error upon signout
I frequently receive the following error upon signout: "Warning: Session object destruction failed in /usr/share/squirrelmail/src/signout.php on line 47" Platform: Debian Woody, Quad PPro 200 Compaq Squirrelmail: Debian package v 1.2.6 Apache:Debian package v 1.3.26 Browser: win32 Mozilla 1.5 IMAP server: Exchange 5.5, NT4 dual P166 My apologies if this has been discussed/solved previously on the list, as my brief search of the faq and archive turned up nothing for this error. I looked in signout.php, but I can't seem to understand the source of the error. Do I have a permissions or cookie issue? Or something else entirely? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Stan --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] sasal plugin
Hello I having a problem with the sasql plugin can't seem to figure it out, not sure if its Squirrelmail or the plug in I have wrong. The plugin give this error: "Options - Spam Filter Configuration Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in /var/www/html/squirrelmail-1.4.2/plugins/sasql/sasql_db.php on line 25" All the database is set up right I'm sure. Thank for any help Daniel --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] frequent error upon signout
> > I frequently receive the following error upon signout: > > "Warning: Session object destruction failed in > /usr/share/squirrelmail/src/signout.php on line 47" > Platform: Debian Woody, Quad PPro 200 Compaq > Squirrelmail: Debian package v 1.2.6 1.2.6 is pretty darn old. Get the 1.4.2 debian package at http://squirrelmail.org/download.php and we'll be much more inclined to help debug a more recent SM version. - paul --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Changing default for nicknames mailing
> Thanks for the advice. Any idea of how to reach one of these > administrators? not too hard to find... http://help.riseup.net/ > I thought that was what I might accomplish by sending > this email originally. Also, when you say "search google/squirrelmail" do > you mean for that plugin you recommended? I mean for ideas on how to export your hotmail address book. MS probably does their best to make it difficult so you will be stuck with their service reading their ads and buying their products. :( Cheers, Paul > Thanks, > >> Ezra, >> >>> I want to change the default so that when I mail things to people for >>> whom >>> I do not have nicknames set up in my address book (although I may think >>> I >>> do) they do no go out. Right now, if I type in a name and it does not >>> find an address, it simply defaults to sending the mail to >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] For example, say I think that a friend of mine >>> named >>> John is set up in my address book, but actually isn't. I send him a >>> letter and type only "john" in the "to" form. Rather than going to the >>> right address (say, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) or telling me "sorry, 'john' is not >>> a >>> viable nickname" it simply sends the letter along to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> whoever that may be. This is BAD. It means that I send emails to >>> strangers and think that information has been conveyed to friends that >>> hasn't. How do I make this stop (aside from making sure I have >>> everyone's >>> email in my address book- >> >> Sounds like you are not an administrator at riseup.net. The solution >> to >> your problem would have to involve administrative access and changing >> some code, so you should talk to someone at riseup and refer them to >> this list if needed. >> >>> which brings me to another point- how do I take >>> all of my addresses from my evil hotmail account and put them here - my >>> new account- without cutting and pasting them all by hand?). >> >> Not sure if riseup has installed the abook_import_export plugin, but >> that would be a start, although you'll have to see if Hotmail has any >> means that would allow you to export your addressbook. Browse the >> SquirrelMail web site and/or Google, and you might turn something up >> too. >> >> - paul >> > > --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Memory Issue?
> I have a RedHat linux 8.0 install using UW imap, on a AMD 1600 w/ 256MB of > RAM. I notice by using the TOP command and watching memory, I will have > about 60MB of free Mem. If i login to squirrelmail (1.4.0), and just > click around on folders and emails, the available mem will drop withing a > few minutes from the 60MB free to about 5MB, and I can see the slowness. > If i restart the http service it will be back up to 60MB free again. Can > anyone tell me what might be causing this? How can i fix? Well I have a familiar problem, but I`m not sure if it is related to squirrelmail or apache itself. We have a pentium4 with 512 MB RAM.Using SuSE 9.0 with cyrus-imapd. I know you can limit the memoryuasge in apache, but how much memory does apache need to run the application proper? The system has about 1900 users in Mysql. The purpose is to have a usage of 256 or 512 users constant. Is it possible to tweak squirrelmail? Some hints are appreciated. Thanx in advance. Robert > Thanks > > -- > Tim > > > --- > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > -- > squirrelmail-users mailing list > List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 > List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users > --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] Memory Issue?
It's important to fully understand what the Linux free command means. Linux uses as much memory as it can as disk cache, should a program need that memory Linux will immediately drop that disk cache and free the memory for the running program so when you look at the output of free, subtract "cached" from "used" to get a better idea of the available ram for programs. "free" is only that part that is completely unused (i.e. wasted). So it's a good thing that it's only 5 megs as long as cache is high and there's plenty of available memory. What's likely happening here is Linux is caching your folder files which is a good thing as it's likely you'll be reading from that file again. UW-IMAP has some performance problems of it's own though. Be sure to look at the SM documentation on speeding up UW: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/en_US/SpeedWithUW My suggestion though is to look at moving to a more effecient and powerful IMAP server like Courier or Cyrus. ~ Jay Lee Network / Systems Administrator Information Technology Dept. Philadelphia Biblical University Langhorne, PA ~~ Robert Bovens said: >> I have a RedHat linux 8.0 install using UW imap, on a AMD 1600 w/ 256MB >> of >> RAM. I notice by using the TOP command and watching memory, I will have >> about 60MB of free Mem. If i login to squirrelmail (1.4.0), and just >> click around on folders and emails, the available mem will drop withing >> a >> few minutes from the 60MB free to about 5MB, and I can see the slowness. >> If i restart the http service it will be back up to 60MB free again. >> Can >> anyone tell me what might be causing this? How can i fix? > > Well I have a familiar problem, but I`m not sure if it is related to > squirrelmail or apache itself. > We have a pentium4 with 512 MB RAM.Using SuSE 9.0 with cyrus-imapd. > I know you can limit the memoryuasge in apache, but how much memory does > apache need to run the application proper? > The system has about 1900 users in Mysql. The purpose is to have a usage > of > 256 or 512 users constant. > Is it possible to tweak squirrelmail? > > Some hints are appreciated. > > Thanx in advance. > > Robert > >> Thanks >> >> -- >> Tim >> >> >> --- >> SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. >> Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with >> a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! >> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click >> -- >> squirrelmail-users mailing list >> List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> List Archives: >> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 >> List Info: >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users >> > > > > --- > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > -- > squirrelmail-users mailing list > List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 > List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users > --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] frequent error upon signout
p dont think said: > 1.2.6 is pretty darn old. > > Get the 1.4.2 debian package at > > http://squirrelmail.org/download.php > > and we'll be much more inclined to help debug a more recent SM version. Thx for the suggestion. 1.4.2 appears to run much faster than 1.2.6 did, and I don't see the signout error now. Stan --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] compose works ok, reply/forward does nothing?
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 20:45:39 -0800 (PST) "p dont think" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We've been using Squirrelmail for over a year (recently upgraded to > > 1.4.2), and just a very few users who are having problems. > > This is likely a bug that has been reported in a few rare instances > before. A tag is unexplicably broken up, which disrupts the > and IE doesn't respond to the send button. The telltale sign here is the > presence of the closing bracket for that tag at the bottom of the compose > screen. None of the developers has been able to reproduce this, and it > seems like it might be a server configuration problem. If you can help us > reproduce it, maybe a solution can be offered. Otherwise, you're on your > own... Hmm...the main problem is that I (or the help desk staff) *can't* reproduce the problem. They all seem to be remote users--people within our local network don't have the problem. I've never had the problem myself, either with Mozilla-based browsers(which are my preference), or the few times I've tried to reproduce the problem with IE. How do you mean broken up? Is there supposed to be a space in there? (it's been a while since I've been a html monkey, and I don't recognize that tag. It's showing up for me as . Or do you mean with a line break in there somewhere? > > Specifically, they can compose new mail and send it just fine, but when > > they try to reply or forward an existing message, nothing happens. Most of > > the users are using Internet Explorer of some kind (usually v6), and are > > accepting cookies as far as I can tell--most of them are remote users and > > I can't easily check on their configuration. -- Dan Bongert [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSCC Unix System Administrator --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] intergrating lbdb into the address book
> Hey guys 'n' gals, > > Any one ever tried to intergrate lbdb into the address book of > squirrelmail? > I'm crrently using it for mutt et al and would love to have it in SM. > > Any ideas! ldbd backend is not supported by squirrelmail. Only lbdb m_ldap address book can be integrated into squirrelmail as global LDAP address book. squirrelmail can use it only if php pear db module supports it (nope, no support) or if somebody writes lbdb backend functions. -- Tomas --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
[SM-USERS] Question about v1.5 - UID and speed problems?
Hello: I just tried a simple installation of v1.5 SquirrelMail (we have been using v1.4.2). I have discovered that the initial inbox display for an IMAP folder with about 1100 messages is several times longer in v1.5. In v1.4.2 it only takes a couple of seconds to display the first 15 messages, and in v1.5 it takes more than 30 seconds. In v1.4.2 with our EIMS server, we resolved this problem (and an incompatibility problem) by setting "Enable UID Support" to FALSE in the Squirremail config. I don't see a UID setting in v1.5. Anything else I can do to speed this up? Thanks, James --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
Re: [SM-USERS] compose works ok, reply/forward does nothing?
Hello Dan, On Monday, February 23, 2004, Dan Bongert wrote... >>> We've been using Squirrelmail for over a year (recently upgraded >>> to 1.4.2), and just a very few users who are having problems. >> >> This is likely a bug that has been reported in a few rare instances >> before. A tag is unexplicably broken up, which disrupts the >> and IE doesn't respond to the send button. [..] > How do you mean broken up? Is there supposed to be a space in there? > (it's been a while since I've been a html monkey, and I don't > recognize that tag. It's showing up for me as . Or do you mean > with a line break in there somewhere? is XML specific, or XHTML. XML requires an opening and closing tag. As doesn't have a closing tag (such as for example), you close it using . There have been a couple of (non-reproducable by developers) issues where the /> part has appeared AFTER the section, which makes the submit button not work (as it doesn't have a form element to match). As was suggested, the usual tell-tale sign of this issue is actually under the body box. You'll see a rogue > sitting in the middle of nowhere. This is how you tell :) You might want to see if it can *always* reproduce it from their workstation. If yes, try a windows update, if still reproducible, kill user, and hide under carpet. :) -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
