[SM-USERS] (no subject)

2003-09-21 Thread navi
We are using squirrelmail on a Red Hat 8 server (pre-installed). We are
facing a problem. The no. of httpd processes (Apache)running on the server
keeps on increasing and when the maximum limit  (set to 250) reaches, the
server stops responding to any new http connection request. If we restart
httpd, the problem disappears and repeats again. Usually we have to
restart httpd once or twice a day.

Please help.






---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users


Re: [SM-USERS] (no subject)

2003-09-21 Thread David Chait
This is definitly an apache issue, not SM. If I were you I would verify you
are using a current version, and consider moving to RH 9, 8 was never very
stable for me.


- Original Message - 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 12:35 AM
Subject: [SM-USERS] (no subject)


> We are using squirrelmail on a Red Hat 8 server (pre-installed). We are
> facing a problem. The no. of httpd processes (Apache)running on the server
> keeps on increasing and when the maximum limit  (set to 250) reaches, the
> server stops responding to any new http connection request. If we restart
> httpd, the problem disappears and repeats again. Usually we have to
> restart httpd once or twice a day.
>
> Please help.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> --
> squirrelmail-users mailing list
> List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
> List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
>
>



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users


RE: [SM-USERS] Can SM Do w/o Frames

2003-09-21 Thread p dont think
> What is the approximate date of availability for 1.5?

no date yet.  no time soon  meaning many many months...



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users


RE: [SM-USERS] disappearing options

2003-09-21 Thread p dont think
> > It is not clear if you are talking about the main options page or
some
> > of the items on the display preferences page...?
> 
> Main options page.  The one that contains display prefs, personal
info,
> spam cop, etc.  The "disappearing options" are "new mail options" and
> "spell checker options".  I can recreate this very easily.  Wipe a
user's
> userpref entries from sql.  Log in as that user.  Edit something in
> "display preferences", refresh the page, and boom, no more spellcheck
or
> newmail options.
> 
> > Those two plugins are coded to check your browser version when they
are
> > inserting themselves into the main options page... if you are using
a
> > browser with questionable javascript conformance, they will not
insert
> > themselves into that page.
> 
> spellcheck and newmail?  But why would they show up at all to start
with?

Not sure.  I agree that this is very odd, but the only code that would
disable the plugin is where it checks for those "broken" browsers.
at least that I can see.  And since those two are some of the only ones
that do that check and they are exactly the ones that are disappearing
for you, this is probably where the problem is located.

You can do a little more investigating by opening the file
functions/plugin.php

Find the soupNazi function:

/**
 * This function checks whether the user's USER_AGENT is known to
 * be broken. If so, returns true and the plugin is invisible to the
 * offending browser.
 */
function soupNazi(){

$soup_menu = array('Mozilla/3','Mozilla/2','Mozilla/1', 'Opera 4',
   'Opera/4', 'OmniWeb', 'Lynx');
sqgetGlobalVar('HTTP_USER_AGENT', $user_agent, SQ_SERVER);
foreach($soup_menu as $browser) {
if(stristr($user_agent, $browser)) {
return 1;
}
}
return 0;
}


You can just put "return 0;" at the top of the function so it always
displays the plugin (disables this functionality).  Or before the
"return 1;" you can insert something like 

echo "soup nazi!!";

and see if it is telling you that it actually did find the 'bad
browser'...

  - paul




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users


Re: [SM-USERS] Original msg format distorted in Reply

2003-09-21 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:12:54AM +0800, Michael Lai wrote:
> Not trying to be an a** or anything but how am I suppose to show the 
> distorted format of my "html" message if I don't send it in html? 

Easily.  An html message is a text file,  You can open the html in a
text editor and then paste the relevant part into a text message.  You
seem not to have understood the point so I'll make it easier: if you
send your message to this list in html format, how can we tell the
difference between the html formatting your mail client is applying now
and the html formatting that SquirrelMail applied in the original
message?  How do you know that your mail client hasn't further formatted
(and so obscured) the original message?  If you had simply pasted the
html from the original message into a text message, we'd have an
unambigious record to look at.

> Does
> that not defeat the purpose of the posting if I send it in plain text?  

No. 

> I'd really urge you to get an email client that can show html message.

I can view html messages any time I want but I choose not to view them
by default.  Many people do this for reasons of security or personal
preference.  Your original e-mail didn't even have a plain text
component - any e-mail client that is going to generate html or rich
text e-mail should also generate a plain text version (out of courtesy
to those who can't or don't read html mail and because failing to do so
will often mean your mail is treated as spam).

Sending html-only e-mail to technical mailing lists is especially likely
to draw a negative reaction.

-- 
Bruce


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[SM-USERS] Can't create folder in INBOX

2003-09-21 Thread Simon Bryan
Hi all,
I have had the habit of using INBOX as my base mail directory and creating all the
sub-folders in there. However I have just found that I can't do this anymore - when
I go to FOLDERS and Creat a New folder - the drop down list for 'create as a
subfolder of' just contains the [none].

I have no idea when this started as  I haven't created a folder in a long time

Config File Version  1.4.0
Squirrelmail Version 1.4.1
PHP Version  4.2.2

The administrator plugin reports the above as version nmbers.

Cheers

Simon Bryan
IT Manager
OLMC Parramatta


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users


RE: [SM-USERS] Can SM Do w/o Frames

2003-09-21 Thread Jonathan Angliss
>> What is the approximate date of availability for 1.5?
>
> no date yet.  no time soon  meaning many many months...

Also meaning that 1.5 is development releases, chances of an actual
release are slim as most changes in development 1.5 are tested for a
period, and ported back to the 1.4 releases.

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users


Re: [SM-USERS] Can't create folder in INBOX

2003-09-21 Thread Jonathan Angliss
> Hi all,
> I have had the habit of using INBOX as my base mail directory and creating
> all the sub-folders in there. However I have just found that I can't do
this
> anymore - when I go to FOLDERS and Creat a New folder - the drop down list
> for 'create as a subfolder of' just contains the [none].
>
> I have no idea when this started as  I haven't created a folder in a long
> time

Any chance of more details? Such as any errors? What IMAP server etc etc? 
All I can guess is that you can see is [none] in the list, and cannot
create folders, you haven't told use what happens when you try.

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users