Re: SolrCore has a large number of SolrIndexSearchers retained in "infoRegistry"
Hi, I was wondering if anyone has found any resolution to this email thread? Thank you, Siva Kommuri -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCore-has-a-large-number-of-SolrIndexSearchers-retained-in-infoRegistry-tp483900p982700.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SolrCore has a large number of SolrIndexSearchers retained in "infoRegistry"
Thank you very much Hoss for the reply. I am using the embedded mode (SolrServer). I am not explicitly accessing SolrIndexSearcher. I am explicitly closing the SolrCore after the request has been processed. Although I did notice that I am using SolrQueryRequest object and is not explicitly getting closed. I will test that one out and will let you know. Thanks again! -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCore-has-a-large-number-of-SolrIndexSearchers-retained-in-infoRegistry-tp483900p1000472.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SolrCore has a large number of SolrIndexSearchers retained in "infoRegistry"
Hi, It didn't seem like it improved the situation. The same exception stack traces are found. I have explicitly defined the index readers to be reopened by specifying in the solrconfig.xml The exception occurs when the remote cores are being searched. I am attaching the exceptions in a text file for reference. http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n1002926/solrexceptions.txt solrexceptions.txt Couple of notes: 1. QueryComponent#process Is requesting for a SolrIndexSearcher twice by calling SolrQueryRequest#getSearcher() but is never being closed. I see several instances where getSearcher is being called but is never being properly closed - performing a quick call heirarchy of SolrQueryRequest#getSearcher() and SolrQueryRequest#close() will illustrate this point. 2. It may be the case that this exception was never encountered because typical deployments are not heavily using Distributed Search across multiple Solr Cores and/or it's a small memory leak and so never noticed? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCore-has-a-large-number-of-SolrIndexSearchers-retained-in-infoRegistry-tp483900p1002926.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.