i think it is time to release new solr version

[j . L]

because lucene 2.3.0 today released..



-- 
regards
j.L

Re: question about fl=score

[j . L]

2008/3/20 李银松 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> 1、When I set fl=score ,solr returns just as fl=*,score ,not just scores
> Is it a bug or just do it on purpose?


u can set fl=id,score, solr not support the style like fl=score


> My customer want to get the 1th-10010th added docs
> So I have to sort by timestamp, to get top10010 docs' timestamp ……


 limit 1, 10010 order by timestamp?


-- 
regards
j.L

Re: Chinese Language + Solr

[j . L]

u can try je-analyzer,,,i  building 17m docs search site by solr and
je-analyzer

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> N-gram works pretty well for Chinese, there are even studies to
> back that up.
>
> Do not use the N-gram matches for highlighting. They look really
> stupid to native speakers.
>
> wunder
>
> On 5/14/08 2:03 PM, "Otis Gospodnetic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There are no free morphological analyzers for Chinese (are there for any
> > language?) that I know.  People tend to use one of the n-gram analyzers
> from
> > Lucene contrib.  I've used them before and they do OK.
> >
> >
> > Otis
> > --
> > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
> >
> >
> > - Original Message 
> >> From: Francisco Sanmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 4:54:05 PM
> >> Subject: Chinese Language + Solr
> >>
> >> I have had successful experiences using Sorl with an English website,
> >> and now I am going to deploy Solr in a chinese site. I've been looking
> >> in the mailing list and there are some useful information in the old
> posts.
> >> But, we would like some kind of feedback of the people who already have
> >> deployed Solr in any CJK Language.
> >>
> >> Is there any free and good analyzer? (Preferible morphological)
> >> Among all the commercial analyzers, what would you recommend? Is there
> >> any of them that works ok out-of-the-box with Solr?
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance.
> >>
> >> Pako
> >
>
>


-- 
regards
j.L

Re: Chinese Language + Solr

[j . L]

if commercial analyzers， i recommend http://www.hylanda.com/(it is the best
analyzer in chinese word)

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 8:32 AM, j. L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> u can try je-analyzer,,,i  building 17m docs search site by solr and
> je-analyzer
>
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> N-gram works pretty well for Chinese, there are even studies to
>> back that up.
>>
>> Do not use the N-gram matches for highlighting. They look really
>> stupid to native speakers.
>>
>> wunder
>>
>> On 5/14/08 2:03 PM, "Otis Gospodnetic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > There are no free morphological analyzers for Chinese (are there for any
>> > language?) that I know.  People tend to use one of the n-gram analyzers
>> from
>> > Lucene contrib.  I've used them before and they do OK.
>> >
>> >
>> > Otis
>> > --
>> > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>> >
>> >
>> > - Original Message 
>> >> From: Francisco Sanmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 4:54:05 PM
>> >> Subject: Chinese Language + Solr
>> >>
>> >> I have had successful experiences using Sorl with an English website,
>> >> and now I am going to deploy Solr in a chinese site. I've been looking
>> >> in the mailing list and there are some useful information in the old
>> posts.
>> >> But, we would like some kind of feedback of the people who already have
>> >> deployed Solr in any CJK Language.
>> >>
>> >> Is there any free and good analyzer? (Preferible morphological)
>> >> Among all the commercial analyzers, what would you recommend? Is there
>> >> any of them that works ok out-of-the-box with Solr?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks in advance.
>> >>
>> >> Pako
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> regards
> j.L




-- 
regards
j.L

Re: Chinese Language + Solr

[j . L]

if u can read chinese and wanna write ur chinese-analyzer,,, maybe u can see
it http://www.googlechinablog.com/2006/04/blog-post_10.html



2008/5/15 j. L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> if commercial analyzers， i recommend 
> http://www.hylanda.com/(it<http://www.hylanda.com/%28it>is the best analyzer 
> in chinese word)
>
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 8:32 AM, j. L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> u can try je-analyzer,,,i  building 17m docs search site by solr and
>> je-analyzer
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> N-gram works pretty well for Chinese, there are even studies to
>>> back that up.
>>>
>>> Do not use the N-gram matches for highlighting. They look really
>>> stupid to native speakers.
>>>
>>> wunder
>>>
>>> On 5/14/08 2:03 PM, "Otis Gospodnetic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > There are no free morphological analyzers for Chinese (are there for
>>> any
>>> > language?) that I know.  People tend to use one of the n-gram analyzers
>>> from
>>> > Lucene contrib.  I've used them before and they do OK.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Otis
>>> > --
>>> > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > - Original Message 
>>> >> From: Francisco Sanmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>>> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 4:54:05 PM
>>> >> Subject: Chinese Language + Solr
>>> >>
>>> >> I have had successful experiences using Sorl with an English website,
>>> >> and now I am going to deploy Solr in a chinese site. I've been looking
>>> >> in the mailing list and there are some useful information in the old
>>> posts.
>>> >> But, we would like some kind of feedback of the people who already
>>> have
>>> >> deployed Solr in any CJK Language.
>>> >>
>>> >> Is there any free and good analyzer? (Preferible morphological)
>>> >> Among all the commercial analyzers, what would you recommend? Is there
>>> >> any of them that works ok out-of-the-box with Solr?
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks in advance.
>>> >>
>>> >> Pako
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> regards
>> j.L
>
>
>
>
> --
> regards
> j.L




-- 
regards
j.L

Re: Chinese Language + Solr

[j . L]

I don't know the cost.

I know the bigger chinese search use it.

More chinese people who study and use full-text search think it is the best
chinese analyzer  which u can buy.

Baidu(www.baidu.com), is the biggest chinese search, and googlechina is the
No 2.

Baidu not use it (http://www.hylanda.com/ ),
they use theirself chinese analyzer.




On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Out of curiosity, what's the cost (the site is in Chinese, so I can't tell
> :( )?
> BasisTech are the main people for this type of stuff.  Expensive, though, I
> believe.
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>


-- 
regards
j.L

anyone use hadoop+solr?

[j . L]

can u talk about it ?

maybe i will use hadoop + solr.

thks for ur advice.



-- 
regards
j.L

Re: Chinese Language + Solr

[j . L]

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> I've worked with the Basis products. Solid, good support.
> Last time I talked to them, they were working on hooking
> them into Lucene.
>

i don't know basis product. but i know google use it and in china,
google.cnnot better that baidu.
we always use baidu.com to search chinese information.


>
> For really good quality results from any of these, you need
> to add terms to the user dictionary of the segmenter. These
> may be local jargon, product names, personal names, place
> names, etc.
>

yes, i agree your point.

baidu's analyzer use this way which i learn from Internet.


>
> Baidu has different problems than the rest of us, because
> their code has to be scary fast. They might even trade
> lower quality for more speed.
>

Can u say it more?
I think baidu use more cache server and have effective cache strategy.


>
> wunder
>
>


-- 
regards
j.L

Re: Deleting Solr index

[j . L]

just rm -r SOLR_DIR/data/index.


2008/6/18 Mihails Agafonovs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> How can I clear the whole Solr index?
>  Ar cieņu, Mihails




-- 
regards
j.L