Hi Markus,
SPDY does provide lower latency in the case when I have multiple requests to
the same server/domain. It compresses the header and reduces the number of
connections. But since it uses tls I am not sure if it will be faster than http
1.1. That is why I wanted to test SPDY with solr for inter shard communication.
Currently, using http for communication to solr is slow.
Harsh
> On 17-May-2014, at 9:44 am, "Markus Jelsma-2 [via Lucene]"
> wrote:
>
> Hi Harsh,
>
>
> Does SPDY provide lower latency than HTTP/1.1 with KeepAlive or is it
> encryption that you're after?
>
>
> Markus
>
>
>
> -Original message-
> From:harspras <[hidden email]>
> Sent:Tue 13-05-2014 05:38
> Subject:Re: Solr + SPDY
> To:[hidden email];
> Hi Vinay,
>
> I have been trying to setup a similar environment with SPDY being enabled
> for Solr inter shard communication. Did you happen to have been able to do
> it? I somehow cannot use SolrCloud with SPDY enabled in jetty.
>
> Regards,
> Harsh Prasad
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-SPDY-tp4097771p4135377.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-SPDY-tp4097771p4136507.html
> To unsubscribe from Solr + SPDY, click here.
> NAML
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-SPDY-tp4097771p4136544.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
