sort multiple fields using solr not working
Hi
Can anybody help me to sort multiple fields using solr
Here is the query
$additionalParameters = array(
'facet'=>'true',
'facet.field'=>array('category','subcategory','district'),
'fl'=>'name,category,package,district,score,city,description,id',
'fq'=>array('category:'.$_GET['searchCategory'],'district:'.$_GET['location']),
'sort'=>array('packageId desc', 'id desc')
);
Above code returns only sorted result based on packageId, but its not
sorting with id
My requirement is I need to get last inserted post first and same time
I want to group the packages based on some priority
Regds
dhanesh s.r
Re: sort multiple fields using solr not working
On 12/27/2010 5:09 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
Here is the query
$additionalParameters
= array(
'facet'=>'true',
'facet.field'=>array('category','subcategory','district'),
'fl'=>'name,category,package,district,score,city,description,id',
'fq'=>array('category:'.$_GET['searchCategory'],'district:'.$_GET['location']),
'sort'=>array('packageId
desc', 'id desc')
);
Above code returns only sorted result based on packageId,
but its not sorting with id
What is the type of id field? Is it one the sortable (trie-based) ones? tint,
tdouble, etc.
id field is the unique field ( id)
Re: sort multiple fields using solr not working
On 12/27/2010 5:15 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote: id field is the unique field ( id) Okey, but what is its type? There should be something like
Re: sort multiple fields using solr not working
On 12/27/2010 5:22 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
Its an intiger like 1293452485. I changed the solr schema as you specified
required="true"/>
Restarted the solr server.
First sort field sortId desc is working but the second sort field
packageId desc is not working
Here is the query
$additionalParameters = array(
'facet'=>'true',
'facet.field'=>array('category1','subcategory','district'),
'fl'=>'name1,category1,package,district,score,city,description1,sortId',
'fq'=>array('category1:'.$_GET['searchCategory'],'district:'.$_GET['location']),
'sort'=>array('sortId desc','packageId desc')
);
$results = $solr->search($queries, $start,
MAX_ROWS,$additionalParameters );
I appreciate you for the effort that you are spending for me.
regds
dhanesh
Re: sort multiple fields using solr not working
On 12/27/2010 6:19 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote: Its an intiger like 1293452485. I changed the solr schema as you specified Restarted the solr server. First sort field sortId desc is working but the second sort field packageId desc is not working Then make packageId tint too, like sortId. By the way did you re-index? Yes it was sint and now i changed to tint Restarted the solr server Remove the data from the solr server Added fresh data for testing. But not working the sorting.
Re: sort multiple fields using solr not working
On 12/27/2010 7:03 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
f d
Yes exactly you said it.
It worked
Thanks Ahmet
Here is the working code 'sort'=>array('packageId desc, sortId desc')
Thanks
dhanesh s.r
forward slash not working in my solr search
Hi, Can anybody help me to sort out an issue of forward slash in solr search . I've a category combo box and I'm searching based on the category. Everything working fine except forward slash My category is "Computer / IT" and its not showing the result. But when I removed the leading and trialing space from the slashes it worked (like 'Computer/IT') The field that I specified for category is type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" /> Any clue??? dhanesh s.r
Re: forward slash not working in my solr search
On 1/6/2011 1:37 PM, Grijesh.singh wrote: First you have to check that your indexing process can cause of removing the whitespace - Grijesh While indexing to server I added the category as 'Computer / IT', but when I search with same keyword I am not getting any result. But when I changed the category 'Computer/IT' (note that I removed the space from the both sides of forward slash). and again I indexed to solar.This time I got the result. But my requirement is to index the category as 'Computer / IT' (with space in both side of /) dhanesh
Re: forward slash not working in my solr search
On 1/6/2011 2:06 PM, Grijesh.singh wrote: check with debugQuery=on and also with analysis.jsp ,what happening with your query term and indexed terms. - Grijesh When I debug the query, I got the parsedquery as category:Computer Here is debugged output category:Computer / IT category:Computer / IT category:Computer category:Computer
Re: forward slash not working in my solr search
On 1/6/2011 2:45 PM, Grijesh.singh wrote: use as pharase it will work like "Computer / IT" for you Here IT is a stopword when you are trying query as category:Computer / IT parsed as category:Computer:IT but IT is a stopword for default search field what you have selected so second query removed and only category:Computer is showing use your query as category:"Computer / IT" - Grijesh Hi Grijesh.singh It worked... :) You helped me to fix this issue. Thanks a lot cheers dhanesh s.r
facet result issue
Hi, I've a trouble in facet search.Here is the scenario I've 2 districts say A and B Under the district A, there are two cities say, x and y and under district B, there is another two cities, say j and k When I try to search lists under the district A, search result works fine. Facet also worked.. But along with the facet result I got the other cities under the district B too with its count 0. What I need in my facet result is the cities(x and y only) under district A. No need to show the cities under the district B. Anybody have any suggestions??? Regds dhanesh
Re: facet result issue
Hi...
Wow..very nice..:-) :-)
It worked..
Thanks a lot.
On 1/14/2011 4:10 PM, david.dankwe...@ubs.com wrote:
Try facet.mincount=1 , this will ensure you get only values bigger than
0
So example :
Serach to be q=district:A&facet.field=city&facet.mincount=1
Or via the Java api
SolrQuery solrQuery = new
SolrQuery("district:A").addFacetField("city").setFacetMinCount(1)
-Original Message-
From: dhanesh [mailto:dhan...@hifx.net]
Sent: 14 January 2011 10:17
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: facet result issue
Hi,
I've a trouble in facet search.Here is the scenario I've 2 districts say
A and B Under the district A, there are two cities say, x and y and
under district B, there is another two cities, say j and k
When I try to search lists under the district A, search result works
fine.
Facet also worked..
But along with the facet result I got the other cities under the
district B too with its count 0.
What I need in my facet result is the cities(x and y only) under
district A.
No need to show the cities under the district B.
Anybody have any suggestions???
Regds
dhanesh
Visit our website at http://www.ubs.com
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mails are not encrypted and cannot be guaranteed to be secure or
error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender
therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the
contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities
or related financial instruments.
UBS Limited is a company limited by shares incorporated in the United
Kingdom registered in England and Wales with number 2035362.
Registered office: 1 Finsbury Avenue, London EC2M 2PP. UBS Limited
is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.
UBS AG is a public company incorporated with limited liability in
Switzerland domiciled in the Canton of Basel-City and the Canton of
Zurich respectively registered at the Commercial Registry offices in
those Cantons with Identification No: CH-270.3.004.646-4 and having
respective head offices at Aeschenvorstadt 1, 4051 Basel and
Bahnhofstrasse 45, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland. Registered in the
United Kingdom as a foreign company with No: FC021146 and having a
UK Establishment registered at Companies House, Cardiff, with No:
BR 004507. The principal office of UK Establishment: 1 Finsbury Avenue,
London EC2M 2PP. In the United Kingdom, UBS AG is authorised and
regulated by the Financial Services Authority.
UBS reserves the right to retain all messages. Messages are protected
and accessed only in legally justified cases.
How data is replicating from Master to Slave?
Hi, I'm currently facing an issue with SOLR (exactly with the slaves replication) and after having spent quite a few time reading online I find myself having to ask for some enlightenment. To be more factual, here is the context that led me to this question. If the website administrator edited an existing category name, then I need to re-index all the documents with the newly edited category. Suppose the category is linked with more than 10 million records.I need to re-index all the 10 million documents in SOLR In the case of MySQL it should be like master server writes updates to its binary log files and maintains an index of those files.These binary log files serve as a record of updates to be sent to slave servers. My doubt is in SOLR how the data is replicating from Master to Slave? I'd like to know the internal process of data replication. Is that huge amount of data(10 million records) is copying from Master to slave? This is my first work with Solr. So I'm not sure how to tackle this issue. Regds dhanesh s.r
Re: fq field with facets
Hi
I have faced the same problem and I solved it by adding double quotes
dhanesh s.r
On 2/23/2011 7:47 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Try -
fq={!field f=category}
You can also try surrounding with quotes, but that gets tricky and you'll need
to escape things possibly. Or you could simply backslash escape the whitespace
(and colon, etc) characters.
Erik
On Feb 23, 2011, at 08:25 , Rosa (Anuncios) wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to reduce results from facets. (by category with my schema)
My category field is String type in my schema.xml.
The problem i've got is when the category value has space or special caracter
it doen't work?
Example:
?q=home&fq=category:Appartement ---> works fine
?q=home&fq=category:Appartement for rent--> doesn't work?
?q=home&fq=category:Appartement> Sale--> doesn't work?
I guess there is a workaround this? Sorry if it's obvious... i'm a newbie with
Solr
thanks for your help
rosa
solr search relevancy
Hi, Can anybody help me to resolve an issues with solr search relevancy. Problem is that when somebody search "Bank", it displays some other business related to this phrase. For Eg it shows "Blood bank" and "Power bank" as the first results. To resolve this, we implemented the proximity search at the end of the phrase for getting the relevancy and boost the field.This eliminate the issue in search, and irrelevant results goes down to the last sections For Eg : When a user search "Bank" he gets banks on the top results, not the "Blood banks".This resolved with proximity in phrases and boosting. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12070016/solr-how-to-boost-score-for-early-matches http://localhost:8983/solr/localbusiness/select?q=((name :"bank")^300+OR+((categoryPrefixed:"_CATEGORY_PREFIXED_+bank"~1)^300+AND+(categoryPrefixed:"_CATEGORY_PREFIXED_+bank"~2)^200+AND+(categoryPrefixed:"_CATEGORY_PREFIXED_+bank"~3)^100)+OR+ (tag:"bank")^30+OR+(address:"bank")^5) &start=0&rows=10&wt=json&indent=true But the actual problem occurred when we sort the search result. There is a specific requirement from client that the "Premium" listings should display as top results.For that we have field packageWeight in solr schema with values like 10, 20, 30 for free, basic and premium consecutively. And now when we perform this sorting, we get some irrelevant results to top, but its Premium listing. How this happened is that In solr schema, there is a field "tag". A tag is a small summary or words that used related to the business and can be implemented to provide a quick overview of the business. When a search perform based on "Tag" which is comparatively very low boost. In solr doc, there is a premium business named "Mobile Store" and which is tagged with a keyword "Power Bank". When we search "Bank" without sorting we are getting relevant results first. But when we sort result with field packageWeight, this doc comes first. Is there any way to resolve this issue?? Or at least is there any way to remove certain fields from the sort, but not from search. Regards dhanesh s r -- -- IMPORTANT: This is an e-mail from HiFX IT Media Services Pvt. Ltd. Its content are confidential to the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. It may not be disclosed to or used by anyone other than its intended recipient, nor may it be copied in any way. If received in error, please email a reply to the sender, then delete it from your system. Although this e-mail has been scanned for viruses, HiFX cannot ultimately accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Before you print this email or attachments, please consider the negative environmental impacts associated with printing.
How to identify field names from the suggested values in multiple fields
Hi Anyone help me to build a suggester auto complete based on multiple fields? There are two fields in my schema. Category and Subcategory and I'm trying to build suggester based on these 2 fields. When the suggestions result, how can I distinguish from which filed it come from? I used a copyfields to combine multiple fields into single field and use that field in suggester But this will return the combined result of category and subcategory. I can't differentiate the results that fetch from which field These are the copyfields for autocomplete Suggestions should know from which field its from. For Eg my suggester returns 5 results for the keyword "schools". In that result 2 from the category field and 3 from the subcategory field. Schools (Category) Primary Schools (Subcategory) Driving Schools (Subcategory) Day care and play school (Subcategory) Day Care/Play School (Category) Is there any way to build like this ?? -- [image: hifx_logo] <http://hifx.in/> *dhanesh s.R * Team Lead t: (+91) 484 4011750 (ext. 712) | m: (+91) 99 4 703 e: dhan...@hifx.in | w: www.hifx.in <https://www.facebook.com/HiFXIT> <https://twitter.com/HiFXTweets> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/2889649> <https://plus.google.com/104259935226993895226/about> -- -- IMPORTANT: This is an e-mail from HiFX IT Media Services Pvt. Ltd. Its content are confidential to the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. It may not be disclosed to or used by anyone other than its intended recipient, nor may it be copied in any way. If received in error, please email a reply to the sender, then delete it from your system. Although this e-mail has been scanned for viruses, HiFX cannot ultimately accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Before you print this email or attachments, please consider the negative environmental impacts associated with printing.
Re: How to identify field names from the suggested values in multiple fields
Thank you for the quick response. If I use 2 suggesters, can I get the result in a single request? http://192.17.80.99:8983/solr/core1/suggest?suggest=true&suggest.dictionary=mySuggester&wt=xml&suggest.q=school Is there any helping document to build multiple suggesters?? On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: > Configure two suggesters, one based on each field. Use both of them and > you’ll get separate suggestions from each. > > wunder > Walter Underwood > wun...@wunderwood.org > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > > > On Jun 3, 2015, at 10:03 PM, Dhanesh Radhakrishnan > wrote: > > > Hi > > Anyone help me to build a suggester auto complete based on multiple > fields? > > There are two fields in my schema. Category and Subcategory and I'm > trying > > to build suggester based on these 2 fields. When the suggestions result, > > how can I distinguish from which filed it come from? > > > > I used a copyfields to combine multiple fields into single field and use > > that field in suggester > > But this will return the combined result of category and subcategory. I > > can't differentiate the results that fetch from which field > > > > These are the copyfields for autocomplete > > > > > > > > Suggestions should know from which field its from. > > For Eg my suggester returns 5 results for the keyword "schools". In that > > result 2 from the category field and 3 from the subcategory field. > > > > Schools (Category) > > Primary Schools (Subcategory) > > Driving Schools (Subcategory) > > Day care and play school (Subcategory) > > Day Care/Play School (Category) > > > > > > Is there any way to build like this ?? > > > > > > -- > > [image: hifx_logo] <http://hifx.in/> > > *dhanesh s.R * > > Team Lead > > t: (+91) 484 4011750 (ext. 712) | m: (+91) 99 4 703 > > e: dhan...@hifx.in | w: www.hifx.in > > <https://www.facebook.com/HiFXIT> <https://twitter.com/HiFXTweets> > > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/2889649> > > <https://plus.google.com/104259935226993895226/about> > > > > -- > > > > -- > > IMPORTANT: This is an e-mail from HiFX IT Media Services Pvt. Ltd. Its > > content are confidential to the intended recipient. If you are not the > > intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in > error > > and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this > > e-mail is strictly prohibited. It may not be disclosed to or used by > anyone > > other than its intended recipient, nor may it be copied in any way. If > > received in error, please email a reply to the sender, then delete it > from > > your system. > > > > Although this e-mail has been scanned for viruses, HiFX cannot ultimately > > accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to > scan > > attachments (if any). > > > > > > Before you print this email or attachments, please consider the negative > > environmental impacts associated with printing. > > -- [image: hifx_logo] <http://hifx.in/> *dhanesh s.R * Team Lead t: (+91) 484 4011750 (ext. 712) | m: (+91) 99 4 703 e: dhan...@hifx.in | w: www.hifx.in <https://www.facebook.com/HiFXIT> <https://twitter.com/HiFXTweets> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/2889649> <https://plus.google.com/104259935226993895226/about> -- -- IMPORTANT: This is an e-mail from HiFX IT Media Services Pvt. Ltd. Its content are confidential to the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. It may not be disclosed to or used by anyone other than its intended recipient, nor may it be copied in any way. If received in error, please email a reply to the sender, then delete it from your system. Although this e-mail has been scanned for viruses, HiFX cannot ultimately accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Before you print this email or attachments, please consider the negative environmental impacts associated with printing.
Re: Derive suggestions across multiple fields
es, I've read the guide. I've found out that there is a need to do > > >>> > re-indexing if I'm creating a new copyField. It works when I used > the > > >>> > copyField that's created before the indexing is done. > > >>> > > > >>> > As I'm using the spellcheck dictionary as my suggester, so does > that > > >>> mean I > > >>> > just need to build the spellcheck dictionary? > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > Regards, > > >>> > Edwin > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > On 3 June 2015 at 17:36, Alessandro Benedetti < > > >>> benedetti.ale...@gmail.com> > > >>> > wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> > > Can you share you suggester configurations ? > > >>> > > Have you read the guide I linked ? > > >>> > > Has the suggestion index/fst has been built ? ( you need to build > > the > > >>> > > suggester) > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Cheers > > >>> > > > > >>> > > 2015-06-03 4:07 GMT+01:00 Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo < > > edwinye...@gmail.com>: > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Thank you for your explanation. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > I'll not need to care where the suggestions are coming from. > All > > the > > >>> > > > suggestions from different fields can be consolidate and > display > > >>> > > together. > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > I've tried to put those field into a new Suggestion copy field, > > but > > >>> no > > >>> > > > suggestion is shown when I set: > > >>> > > > Suggestion > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Is there a need to re-index the documents in order for this to > > work? > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > Regards, > > >>> > > > Edwin > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > On 2 June 2015 at 17:25, Alessandro Benedetti < > > >>> > > benedetti.ale...@gmail.com> > > >>> > > > wrote: > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > Hi Edwin, > > >>> > > > > I have worked extensively recently in Suggester and the blog > I > > >>> feel > > >>> > to > > >>> > > > > suggest is Erick's one. > > >>> > > > > It's really detailed and good for a beginner and expert as > > well. > > >>> [1] > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > Apart that let's see you particular use case : > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > 1) Do you want to be able to get also where the suggestions > are > > >>> > coming > > >>> > > > from > > >>> > > > > ? > > >>> > > > > e.g. > > >>> > > > > suggestion1 from field1 > > >>> > > > > suggestion2 from field2 ? > > >>> > > > > In this case I would try with multiple dictionaries but I am > > not > > >>> sure > > >>> > > > Solr > > >>> > > > > allows you to use them concurrently. > > >>> > > > > But can be a really nice extension to develop. > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > 2) If you don't care where the suggestions are coming from, > > just > > >>> use > > >>> > a > > >>> > > > copy > > >>> > > > > field, where you copy the content of the interesting fields. > > >>> > > > > The suggestions will come from the fields you have copied in > > the > > >>> copy > > >>> > > > > field, without distinction. > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > Hope this helps you > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > Cheers > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > >
Re: How to identify field names from the suggested values in multiple fields
Dear Erick, That document help me to build multiple suggesters But still there is one problem that I faced. When I used both suggesters with same lookupImpl as AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory solr throws an error Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException at org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.fst.AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory.create(AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory.java:138) at org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SolrSuggester.init(SolrSuggester.java:107) at org.apache.solr.handler.component.SuggestComponent.inform(SuggestComponent.java:119) at org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader.inform(SolrResourceLoader.java:620) at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.(SolrCore.java:868) ... 8 more So that I changed the Lookup with FuzzyLookupFactory suggester worked for both fields. Is there any limitation using AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory for multiple suggesters I'm using SOLR 5.1 Regards dhanesh s.r On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Yes, this might help: http://lucidworks.com/blog/solr-suggester/ > > Best, > Erick > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Dhanesh Radhakrishnan > wrote: > > Thank you for the quick response. > > If I use 2 suggesters, can I get the result in a single request? > > > http://192.17.80.99:8983/solr/core1/suggest?suggest=true&suggest.dictionary=mySuggester&wt=xml&suggest.q=school > > Is there any helping document to build multiple suggesters?? > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Walter Underwood > > > wrote: > > > >> Configure two suggesters, one based on each field. Use both of them and > >> you’ll get separate suggestions from each. > >> > >> wunder > >> Walter Underwood > >> wun...@wunderwood.org > >> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > >> > >> > >> On Jun 3, 2015, at 10:03 PM, Dhanesh Radhakrishnan > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi > >> > Anyone help me to build a suggester auto complete based on multiple > >> fields? > >> > There are two fields in my schema. Category and Subcategory and I'm > >> trying > >> > to build suggester based on these 2 fields. When the suggestions > result, > >> > how can I distinguish from which filed it come from? > >> > > >> > I used a copyfields to combine multiple fields into single field and > use > >> > that field in suggester > >> > But this will return the combined result of category and > subcategory. I > >> > can't differentiate the results that fetch from which field > >> > > >> > These are the copyfields for autocomplete > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Suggestions should know from which field its from. > >> > For Eg my suggester returns 5 results for the keyword "schools". In > that > >> > result 2 from the category field and 3 from the subcategory field. > >> > > >> > Schools (Category) > >> > Primary Schools (Subcategory) > >> > Driving Schools (Subcategory) > >> > Day care and play school (Subcategory) > >> > Day Care/Play School (Category) > >> > > >> > > >> > Is there any way to build like this ?? > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > [image: hifx_logo] <http://hifx.in/> > >> > *dhanesh s.R * > >> > Team Lead > >> > t: (+91) 484 4011750 (ext. 712) | m: (+91) 99 4 703 > >> > e: dhan...@hifx.in | w: www.hifx.in > >> > <https://www.facebook.com/HiFXIT> <https://twitter.com/HiFXTweets> > >> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/2889649> > >> > <https://plus.google.com/104259935226993895226/about> > >> > > >> > -- > >> > > >> > -- > >> > IMPORTANT: This is an e-mail from HiFX IT Media Services Pvt. Ltd. Its > >> > content are confidential to the intended recipient. If you are not the > >> > intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in > >> error > >> > and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of > this > >> > e-mail is strictly prohibited. It may not be disclosed to or used by > >> anyone > >> > other than its intended recipient, nor may it be copied in any way. If > >> > received in error, please email a reply to the sender, then delete it > >> from > >> > your system. > >> >
Re: Derive suggestions across multiple fields
; > >> > > > > > > > > >> >> I think I'm confused with the old spellcheck approach > that > > > came > > > > > out > > > > > > > >> more > > > > > > > >> >> frequently during my research. > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> Just to confirm, do I need to re-index the data in order > > for > > > > this > > > > > > new > > > > > > > >> >> approach to work if I'm using an existing field? > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> Regards, > > > > > > > >> >> Edwin > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> On 4 June 2015 at 16:58, Alessandro Benedetti < > > > > > > > >> benedetti.ale...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> wrote: > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > Let me try to clarify the things… > > > > > > > >> >> > Because you are using solr 5.1 I can not see any reason > > to > > > > try > > > > > to > > > > > > > use > > > > > > > >> >> the > > > > > > > >> >> > old spellcheck approach. > > > > > > > >> >> > If you take a look to the page me and Erick quoted > there > > > is a > > > > > > > simple > > > > > > > >> >> config > > > > > > > >> >> > example : > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > class="solr.SuggestComponent"> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > mySuggester > > > > > > > >> >> > > FuzzyLookupFactory > > > > > > > >> >> > > suggester_fuzzy_dir > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > name="dictionaryImpl">DocumentDictionaryFactory > > > > > > > >> >> > > title > > > > > > > >> >> > > name="suggestAnalyzerFieldType">suggestType > > > > > > > >> >> > > false > > > > > > > >> >> > > false > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > class="solr.SearchHandler" > > > > > > > >> >> > > startup="lazy" > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > true > > > > > > > >> >> > > 10 > > > > > > > >> >> > > mySuggester > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > suggest > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > You should use this approach. > > > > > > > >> >> > After you build the Suggestion Dictionary ( after your > > > first > > > > > > commit > > > > > > > >> or > > > > > > > >> >> > manually) you are going to be able to see the > > suggestions. > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > Your config appears to be very confused ( why an > edismax > > > > query > > > > > >
Solr spatial search within the polygon
Hi,
I'm experimenting with solr spatial search, with plotting points in the map
(Latitude and longitude) and based on the value I need to get the result.
As the first step I've defined the filed type as
And then added the field *location* as type *location_rpt*
Indexed the location filed as $latitude, $longitude So that data in the
*location* will be like
"location":["9.445890,76.540970"]
Next I draw a polygon in google map and collected the lat and lng
coordinates of the polygon.
It will be like
9.472992 76.540817, 9.441328 76.523651 , 9.433708 76.555065 , 9.458092
76.572403, 9.472992 76.540817
Based on this coordinates I performed a query in solr like this
localhost:8983/solr/ha_poc/select?fl=id,name,district,locality&wt=json&
json.nl=map&q=*:*&fq=location:"IsWithin(POLYGON((9.472992 76.540817,
9.441328 76.523651 , 9.433708 76.555065 , 9.458092 76.572403, 9.472992
76.540817))) distErrPct=0"
But I didn't get the result from the solr as I expected.
{
- "responseHeader": {
- "status": 0,
- "QTime": 2
},
- "response": {
- "numFound": 0,
- "start": 0,
- "docs": [ ]
}
}
Is there anything that I missed ???
Can anybody help me in solving this issue with solr spatial search.
I'm using Solr 4.4.0
Added an additional dependency JTS jar file for the support of polygon
/lib/ext/jts-1.13.jar
--
*dhanesh s.r*
Re: Solr spatial search within the polygon
Hi David,
Thank you so much for the detailed reply. I've checked each and every lat
lng coordinates and its a purely polygon.
After some time I did one change in the lat lng indexing.
Changed the indexing format.
Initially I indexed the latitude and longitude separated by comma Eg:-
"location":["9.445890,76.540970"]
Instead I indexed with space.
"location":["9.445890 76.540970"]
and it worked
Also from your observation on IsWithIn predicate I tested with Intersects
and I found there is a difference in the QTime.
For IsWithin
"QTime": 9
ResponseHeader": {
"status": 0,
"QTime": 9
},
When I used "Intersects"
responseHeader": {
"status": 0,
"QTime": 26
}
Thank you so much
Regards
dhanesh s.r
Re: Solr spatial search within the polygon
Hi David,
Thank you for your reply
This is my current schema and field type "location_rpt" is a
SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType and
Field "location" is a type "location_rpt" and its multiValued
Whenever add a document to solr, I'll collect the current latitude and
longitude of particular business and index in the field "location"
It's like
$doc->setField('location', $business['latitude']."
".$business['longitude']);
This should looks like "location":["9.445890 76.540970"] in solr
What I'm doing is that in Map view of search result , there is one
provision to draw polygon in map and fetch the result based on the drawing.
http://localhost:8983/solr/poc/select?fl=id,name,locality&wt=json&json.nl=map&q=*:*&fq=state:Kerala&fq=location:"IsWithin(POLYGON((9.471920923238988
76.5496015548706,9.464174399734185 76.53947353363037,9.457232011740006
76.55457973480225,9.471920923238988 76.5496015548706)))
distErrPct=0"&debugQuery=true
I'm pretty sure that the coordinates are in the right position.
"9.445890,76.540970" is in India, precisely in Kerala state :)
It is highly appreciated that you kindly correct me if I'm in wrong way
This is response from solr
"responseHeader": {
"status": 0,
"QTime": 5
},
"response": {
"numFound": 3,
"start": 0,
"docs": [
{
"id": "192",
"name": "50 cents of ideal plot",
"locality": "Changanassery"
},
{
"id": "189",
"name": "new independent house for sale",
"locality": "Changanassery"
},
{
"id": "188",
"name": "Renovated Resort style home with 21 cent",
"locality": "Changanassery"
}
]
}
Here is the debug mode output of the query
"debug": {
"rawquerystring": "*:*",
"querystring": "*:*",
"parsedquery": "MatchAllDocsQuery(*:*)",
"parsedquery_toString": "*:*",
"explain": {
"188": "\n1.0 = (MATCH) MatchAllDocsQuery, product of:\n 1.0 =
queryNorm\n",
"189": "\n1.0 = (MATCH) MatchAllDocsQuery, product of:\n 1.0 =
queryNorm\n",
"192": "\n1.0 = (MATCH) MatchAllDocsQuery, product of:\n 1.0 =
queryNorm\n"
},
"QParser": "LuceneQParser",
"filter_queries": [
"state:Kerala",
"location:\"IsWithin(POLYGON((9.471920923238988
76.5496015548706,9.464174399734185 76.53947353363037,9.457232011740006
76.55457973480225,9.471920923238988 76.5496015548706))) distErrPct=0\""
],
"parsed_filter_queries": [
"state:Kerala",
"ConstantScore(org.apache.lucene.spatial.prefix.WithinPrefixTreeFilter@1ed6c279
)"
],
"timing": {
"time": 5,
"prepare": {
"time": 1,
"query": {
"time": 1
},
"facet": {
"time": 0
},
"mlt": {
"time": 0
},
"highlight": {
"time": 0
},
"stats": {
"time": 0
},
"debug": {
"time": 0
}
},
"process": {
"time": 4,
"query": {
"time": 3
},
"facet": {
"time": 0
},
"mlt": {
"time": 0
},
"highlight": {
"time": 0
},
"stats": {
"time": 0
},
"debug": {
"time": 1
}
}
}
}
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Smiley, David W. wrote:
>
>
> On 11/19/13 4:06 AM, "Dhanesh Radhakrishnan" wrote:
>
> >Hi David,
> >Thank you so much for the detailed reply. I've checked each and every lat
> >lng coordinates and its a purely polygon.
> >After some time I did one change in the lat lng indexing.
> >Changed the indexing form
Occasionally getting error in solr suggester component.
Hi all,
I am experiencing a problem in Solr SuggestComponent
Occasionally solr suggester component throws an error like
Solr failed:
{"responseHeader":{"status":500,"QTime":1},"error":{"msg":"suggester was
not built","trace":"java.lang.IllegalStateException: suggester was not
built\n\tat
org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.analyzing.AnalyzingInfixSuggester.lookup(AnalyzingInfixSuggester.java:368)\n\tat
org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.analyzing.AnalyzingInfixSuggester.lookup(AnalyzingInfixSuggester.java:342)\n\tat
org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.Lookup.lookup(Lookup.java:240)\n\tat
org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SolrSuggester.getSuggestions(SolrSuggester.java:199)\n\tat
org.apache.solr.handler.component.SuggestComponent.process(SuggestComponent.java:234)\n\tat
org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(SearchHandler.java:218)\n\tat
org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:135)\n\tat
org.apache.solr.core.RequestHandlers$LazyRequestHandlerWrapper.handleRequest(RequestHandlers.java:246)\n\tat
org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:1967)\n\tat
org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.execute(SolrDispatchFilter.java:777)\n\tat
org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:418)\n\tat
org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:207)\n\tat
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:243)\n\tat
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:210)\n\tat
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:225)\n\tat
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:123)\n\tat
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:168)\n\tat
org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:98)\n\tat
org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:927)\n\tat
org.apache.catalina.valves.RemoteIpValve.invoke(RemoteIpValve.java:680)\n\tat
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:118)\n\tat
org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:407)\n\tat
org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.process(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:1002)\n\tat
org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$AbstractConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:579)\n\tat
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:312)\n\tat
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)\n\tat
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)\n\tat
java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)\n","code":500}}
This is not freequently happening, but idexing and suggestor component
working togethere this error will occur.
In solr config
haSuggester
AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory
textSpell
DocumentDictionaryFactory
name
packageWeight
true
true
10
suggest
Can any one suggest where to look to figure out this error and why these
errors are occurring?
Thanks,
dhanesh s.r
--
--
--
IMPORTANT: This is an e-mail from HiFX IT Media Services Pvt. Ltd. Its
content are confidential to the intended recipient. If you are not the
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error
and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this
e-mail is strictly prohibited. It may not be disclosed to or used by anyone
other than its intended recipient, nor may it be copied in any way. If
received in error, please email a reply to the sender, then delete it from
your system.
Although this e-mail has been scanned for viruses, HiFX cannot ultimately
accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan
attachments (if any).
Before you print this email or attachments, please consider the negative
environmental impacts associated with printing.
Re: Occasionally getting error in solr suggester component.
Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
As you mentioned in the previous mail I changed buildOnCommit=false in
solrConfig.
After that change, suggestions are not working.
In Solr 4.7 introduced a new approach based on a dedicated SuggestComponent
I'm using that component to build suggestions and lookup implementation is
"AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory"
Is there any work around ??
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Michael Sokolov <
msoko...@safaribooksonline.com> wrote:
> I think you are probably getting bitten by one of the issues addressed in
> LUCENE-5889
>
> I would recommend against using buildOnCommit=true - with a large index
> this can be a performance-killer. Instead, build the index yourself using
> the Solr spellchecker support (spellcheck.build=true)
>
> -Mike
>
>
> On 01/13/2015 10:41 AM, Dhanesh Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am experiencing a problem in Solr SuggestComponent
>> Occasionally solr suggester component throws an error like
>>
>> Solr failed:
>> {"responseHeader":{"status":500,"QTime":1},"error":{"msg":"suggester was
>> not built","trace":"java.lang.IllegalStateException: suggester was not
>> built\n\tat
>> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.analyzing.AnalyzingInfixSuggester.
>> lookup(AnalyzingInfixSuggester.java:368)\n\tat
>> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.analyzing.AnalyzingInfixSuggester.
>> lookup(AnalyzingInfixSuggester.java:342)\n\tat
>> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.Lookup.lookup(Lookup.java:240)\n\tat
>> org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SolrSuggester.
>> getSuggestions(SolrSuggester.java:199)\n\tat
>> org.apache.solr.handler.component.SuggestComponent.
>> process(SuggestComponent.java:234)\n\tat
>> org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(
>> SearchHandler.java:218)\n\tat
>> org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(
>> RequestHandlerBase.java:135)\n\tat
>> org.apache.solr.core.RequestHandlers$LazyRequestHandlerWrapper.
>> handleRequest(RequestHandlers.java:246)\n\tat
>> org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:1967)\n\tat
>> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.execute(
>> SolrDispatchFilter.java:777)\n\tat
>> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(
>> SolrDispatchFilter.java:418)\n\tat
>> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(
>> SolrDispatchFilter.java:207)\n\tat
>> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(
>> ApplicationFilterChain.java:243)\n\tat
>> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(
>> ApplicationFilterChain.java:210)\n\tat
>> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(
>> StandardWrapperValve.java:225)\n\tat
>> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(
>> StandardContextValve.java:123)\n\tat
>> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(
>> StandardHostValve.java:168)\n\tat
>> org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(
>> ErrorReportValve.java:98)\n\tat
>> org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(
>> AccessLogValve.java:927)\n\tat
>> org.apache.catalina.valves.RemoteIpValve.invoke(
>> RemoteIpValve.java:680)\n\tat
>> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(
>> StandardEngineValve.java:118)\n\tat
>> org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(
>> CoyoteAdapter.java:407)\n\tat
>> org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.process(
>> AbstractHttp11Processor.java:1002)\n\tat
>> org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$AbstractConnectionHandler.
>> process(AbstractProtocol.java:579)\n\tat
>> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.
>> run(JIoEndpoint.java:312)\n\tat
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(
>> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)\n\tat
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(
>> ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)\n\tat
>> java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)\n","code":500}}
>>
>> This is not freequently happening, but idexing and suggestor component
>> working togethere this error will occur.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> In solr config
>>
>>
>>
>>haSuggester
>>AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory
>>textSpell
>>DocumentDictionaryFactory
>>
>>name
>>packageWeight
>>true
>>
>>
>>
>>> startup="lazy">
>>
>>true
>>10
>>
>>
>>sugges
Re: Occasionally getting error in solr suggester component.
Hi,
>From Solr 4.7 onwards, the implementation of this Suggester is changed. The
old SpellChecker based search component is replaced with a new suggester
that utilizes Lucene suggester module. The latest Solr download is
preconfigured with this new suggester
I;m using Solr 4.10 and suggestion are based on query /suggest instead of
/spell.
So what I did is that in changed to false
Its not good that each time rebuild the index on commit , however, I
would like to build
the index on certain time period, say 1 hour.
The lookup data will be built only when requested by URL parameter
suggest.build=true
"http://localhost:8983/solr/ha/suggest?suggest.build=true";
So this will rebuild the index again and the changes will reflect in the
suggester.
There are certain pros and cons for this.
Issue is that the change will reflect only on certain time interval, here 1
hour. Advantage is that we can avoid the rebuilt index on every commit or
optimize.
Is this the right way ?? or any that I missed ???
Regards
dhanesh s.r
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Michael Sokolov <
msoko...@safaribooksonline.com> wrote:
> did you build the spellcheck index using spellcheck.build as described
> here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Spell+Checking ?
>
> -Mike
>
>
> On 01/14/2015 07:19 AM, Dhanesh Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Thanks for the reply.
>> As you mentioned in the previous mail I changed buildOnCommit=false in
>> solrConfig.
>> After that change, suggestions are not working.
>> In Solr 4.7 introduced a new approach based on a dedicated
>> SuggestComponent
>> I'm using that component to build suggestions and lookup implementation is
>> "AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory"
>> Is there any work around ??
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Michael Sokolov <
>> msoko...@safaribooksonline.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think you are probably getting bitten by one of the issues addressed in
>>> LUCENE-5889
>>>
>>> I would recommend against using buildOnCommit=true - with a large index
>>> this can be a performance-killer. Instead, build the index yourself
>>> using
>>> the Solr spellchecker support (spellcheck.build=true)
>>>
>>> -Mike
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/13/2015 10:41 AM, Dhanesh Radhakrishnan wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I am experiencing a problem in Solr SuggestComponent
>>>> Occasionally solr suggester component throws an error like
>>>>
>>>> Solr failed:
>>>> {"responseHeader":{"status":500,"QTime":1},"error":{"msg":"suggester
>>>> was
>>>> not built","trace":"java.lang.IllegalStateException: suggester was not
>>>> built\n\tat
>>>> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.analyzing.AnalyzingInfixSuggester.
>>>> lookup(AnalyzingInfixSuggester.java:368)\n\tat
>>>> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.analyzing.AnalyzingInfixSuggester.
>>>> lookup(AnalyzingInfixSuggester.java:342)\n\tat
>>>> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.Lookup.lookup(Lookup.java:240)\n\tat
>>>> org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SolrSuggester.
>>>> getSuggestions(SolrSuggester.java:199)\n\tat
>>>> org.apache.solr.handler.component.SuggestComponent.
>>>> process(SuggestComponent.java:234)\n\tat
>>>> org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(
>>>> SearchHandler.java:218)\n\tat
>>>> org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(
>>>> RequestHandlerBase.java:135)\n\tat
>>>> org.apache.solr.core.RequestHandlers$LazyRequestHandlerWrapper.
>>>> handleRequest(RequestHandlers.java:246)\n\tat
>>>> org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:1967)\n\tat
>>>> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.execute(
>>>> SolrDispatchFilter.java:777)\n\tat
>>>> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(
>>>> SolrDispatchFilter.java:418)\n\tat
>>>> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(
>>>> SolrDispatchFilter.java:207)\n\tat
>>>> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(
>>>> ApplicationFilterChain.java:243)\n\tat
>>>> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(
>>>> ApplicationFilterChain.java:210)\n\tat
>>>> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(
>>>> StandardWrapperValve.java:225)\n\tat
>>>> org.apache.catalina.core.
Solr suggester : duplicate suggestions
Dear all,
I'm facing two issues with solr suggester component.
*First *
If I typed "Fire and safety", I'll get the result. But If I type "Fire &
safety" suggester is not showing
*Second*
I'm getting duplicate suggestions in suggester
"suggest": {
"categorySuggester": {
"software": {
"numFound": 100,
"suggestions": [
{
"term": "Software And Web Development||6070",
"weight": 0,
"payload": ""
},
{
"term": "Software And Web Development||6070",
"weight": 0,
"payload": ""
},
{
"term": "Software And Web Development||6070",
"weight": 0,
"payload": ""
}
]
}
}
}
Here is my configuration
In solrconfig.xml
categorySuggester
AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory
text_suggest
DocumentDictionaryFactory
categoryAutoComplete
categoryRank
false
false
/dictionary/category
true
false
In schema.xml
http://localhost:8983/solr/core-name/suggest?suggest=true&suggest.q=software&suggest.build=false&suggest.dictionary=categorySuggester&wt=json
Please help
Thanks & Regards,
dhanesh s r
Dhanesh S.RSenior Technical Leade : dhan...@hifx.co.in | w : www.hifx.in712
t : (+91) 484 4011750
m : (+91) 994 666 6703
--
IMPORTANT: This is an e-mail from HiFX IT Media Services Pvt. Ltd. Its
content are confidential to the intended recipient. If you are not the
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error
and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this
e-mail is strictly prohibited. It may not be disclosed to or used by anyone
other than its intended recipient, nor may it be copied in any way. If
received in error, please email a reply to the sender, then delete it from
your system.
Although this e-mail has been scanned for viruses, HiFX
cannot ultimately accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your
responsibility to scan attachments (if any).
Before you print this email
or attachments, please consider the negative environmental impacts
associated with printing.
Re: Solr suggester : duplicate suggestions
@Paras Lehana.. Thanks for the reply
Yes "and" is present in the stop words list.
Dhanesh S.RSenior Technical Leade : dhan...@hifx.co.in | w : www.hifx.in712
t : (+91) 484 4011750
m : (+91) 994 666 6703
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:07 PM Paras Lehana
wrote:
> Hi Dhanesh,
>
> Although I handle Auto-Suggest, I have worked a little with Suggester
> component. Suggester provides results as you type. Do you really need it?
>
> Also, I don't know if I'm correct, but where have you described '&' to be
> replaced with 'and'? Is 'and' present in your stopwords list?
>
> I think posting the query and results for both cases of first problem will
> help us more.
>
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 20:50, Dhanesh Radhakrishnan
> wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> > I'm facing two issues with solr suggester component.
> >
> > *First *
> > If I typed "Fire and safety", I'll get the result. But If I type "Fire &
> > safety" suggester is not showing
> >
> > *Second*
> > I'm getting duplicate suggestions in suggester
> >
> > "suggest": {
> > "categorySuggester": {
> > "software": {
> > "numFound": 100,
> > "suggestions": [
> > {
> > "term": "Software And Web Development||6070",
> > "weight": 0,
> > "payload": ""
> > },
> > {
> > "term": "Software And Web Development||6070",
> > "weight": 0,
> > "payload": ""
> > },
> > {
> > "term": "Software And Web Development||6070",
> > "weight": 0,
> > "payload": ""
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ]
> > }
> > }
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> > Here is my configuration
> >
> > In solrconfig.xml
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > categorySuggester
> > AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory
> > text_suggest
> > DocumentDictionaryFactory
> > categoryAutoComplete
> >categoryRank
> > false
> > false
> > /dictionary/category
> > true
> > false
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In schema.xml
> >
> > > stored="true" multiValued="true" />
> >
> >
> > > positionIncrementGap="100">
> >
> >
> > > generateWordParts="1" generateNumberParts="1" catenateWords="1"
> > catenateNumbers="1" catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="1"/>
> >
> >
> > > words="stopwords.txt"/>
> > > ignoreCase="true" expand="true"
> > tokenizerFactory="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> http://localhost:8983/solr/core-name/suggest?suggest=true&suggest.q=software&suggest.build=false&suggest.dictionary=categorySuggester&wt=json
> >
> > Please help
> >
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > dhanesh s r
> >
> >
> > Dhanesh S.RSenior Technical Leade : dhan...@hifx.co.in | w :
> > www.hifx.in712
> > t : (+91) 484 4011750
> > m : (+91) 994 666 6703
> >
> > --
> > IMPORTANT: This is an e-mail from HiFX IT Media Services Pvt. Ltd. Its
> > content are confidential to the intended recipient. If you are not the
> > intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in
> error
> > and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this
> > e-mail is strictly prohibited. It may not be disclosed to or used by
> > anyone
> > other than its intended recipient, nor may it be copied in any way. If
> > received in error, please email a reply to the sender, then delete it
> from
>
Is it possible to add stemming in a text_exact field
Hello, I'm facing an issue with stemming. My search query is "restaurant dubai" and returns results. If I search "restaurants dubai" it returns no data. How to stem this keyword "restaurant dubai" with "restaurants dubai" ? I'm using a text exact field for search. Here is the field definition Is there any solutions without changing the tokenizer class. Dhanesh S.R -- IMPORTANT: This is an e-mail from HiFX IT Media Services Pvt. Ltd. Its content are confidential to the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. It may not be disclosed to or used by anyone other than its intended recipient, nor may it be copied in any way. If received in error, please email a reply to the sender, then delete it from your system. Although this e-mail has been scanned for viruses, HiFX cannot ultimately accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). Before you print this email or attachments, please consider the negative environmental impacts associated with printing.
