Using lucene .net & Solr at the same time

2013-01-01 Thread dafna
hi everyone,

I have a system written in .net that I'm using lucene .net.
I'm thinking of changing that system to be based on solr instead of lucene.
My situation is that I have a lot of code that was written in .net, that I
don't want to waste because moving to solr makes me to change code to java.
I have an idea, but I want to make sure is OK to do that:
I want to keep the .net code as it is. The only change will be the write to
the index and the read from the index.
I want to translate (by object serialize or hard coded serialize) the Query
in search side & document in index side to text, and then call the http
interface from the .net code.

Is that idea can work ? what am I losing with that solution ?
My concern is about the analyzers. Is it ok to call the .net analyzers (in
search & index), and then let solr get the data without any data handling ?

thanks,



--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-lucene-net-Solr-at-the-same-time-tp4029953.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Using lucene .net & Solr at the same time

2013-01-01 Thread dafna
thanks shawn for your answer.

I know that all of the analyzers, tokenizers, filters usally are on server
side.
That is exactly my question, if I will take them outside the engine, and do
it outside, is it still work the same ?



--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-lucene-net-Solr-at-the-same-time-tp4029953p4029957.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Using lucene .net & Solr at the same time

2013-01-01 Thread dafna
The code that I don't want to rewrite is the analyzers.
I have written many analyzers.
I know the benefits of solr, I just want to spend as less time as I can to
see the system in solr.

I don't think you understood my idea:
1. The data handling will be just in lucene .net.
2. The index itself will be in solr.
3. The solr schema contains all fields, but in primitive form.
I agree that managing the schema in two different places can be dangerous.





--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-lucene-net-Solr-at-the-same-time-tp4029953p4029960.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.