How solr text search finding work
For instance,When we searched for “Kredit” and received hits containing the words “Kredit”, “Kredite” and “Kredit-“. However, entries containing the word “Kreditgeber” are not coming up in the results list. Would you know why? Regards Viresh Modi
Re: How solr text search finding work
Declaration: My Field Type Defination as below: On 28 November 2013 19:31, Ahmet Arslan wrote: > Hi Viresh, > > It all about analysis (field type) of the text you are indexing searching. > http://localhost:8983/solr/#/collection1/analysis page is very helpful to > obverse/debug how your text is indexed analyzed. It is probably because of > your stemmer. Can you paste your field type definition? > > > > > On Thursday, November 28, 2013 3:47 PM, Viresh Modi > wrote: > For instance,When we searched for “Kredit” and received hits containing the > words “Kredit”, “Kredite” and “Kredit-“. However, entries containing the > word “Kreditgeber” are not coming up in the results list. Would you know > why? > > > Regards > Viresh Modi > -- Regards, Viresh Modi Software Engineer (Publisher) Email: viresh.m...@highq.com Mobile: +919714567430
dismax request handler will give wrong result in solr 4.3
When i use dismax query type handler in *SOLR 1.4 *and then same for *SOLR
4.3 *then both give different numFound record both have same index profile
as well.
means Solr 1.4 gives 9 records
and Solr 4.3 gives 99 records.
*My Query is:*
start=0&rows=10&hl=true&hl.fl=content&qt=dismax
&q=system admin
&fl=id,application,timestamp,name,score,metaData,metaDataDate
&fq=application:PunitR3_8
&fq= NOT ( id:OnlineR3_8_page_410_0 OR id:OnlineR3_8_page_411_0 OR
id:OnlineR3_8_page_628_0 )
&fq=(metaData:channelId/100 OR metaData:channelId/10 OR
metaData:channelId/160 OR metaData:channelId/12)&sort=score desc
*and In Solr Config.xml has handler::*
dismax
explicit
content name
1000
true
content
150
name
regex
--
Regards,
Viresh Modi
support for and Why remove dismax handler remove in solr 4.3
i checked solrconfig.xml in solr 4.3 and solr 1.4 In both i have checked *Solr 1.4::* *Solr 4.3::* so how to handle dismax query type(qt) in solr 4.3 in solr 1.4.1 we have used qt=dismax but solr 4.3 there is no such configuration. so both give different result. -- Regards, Viresh Modi
How can i search maximum number of word in particular docs
Mu Query Looks Like: start=0&rows=10&hl=true&hl.fl=content&qt=dismax &q=pookan &fl=id,application,timestamp,name,score,metaData,metaDataDate &fq=application:OnlineR3_6_4 &fq=(metaData:channelId/101 OR metaData:channelId/104) &sort=score desc but not getting result as per desired OnlineR3_6_4_101_7 pookan pookan pookan OnlineR3_6_4_101_20 pookan pookan pookan pookan pookan OnlineR3_6_4_101_19 pookan pookan pookan pookan OnlineR3_6_4_101_21 pookan pookan Acutually i want particular word for that match max in content tag that come first (relevancy based)
Exact Word Match Search comes in first come In Solr4.3
I want to get ORDER As Per Exact Search match: Search with "EMIR" comes First exact match “Emir” not “United Arab Emirates”. For example, when you search for “EMIR” the first result has nothing to do with that and is all about “United Arab Emirates”, which obviously contains “Emir” as part of “Emirates”. This is obviously less relevant than an exact match on “EMIR”. *MY SOLR INDEX RESULT:* Weight United Arab Emirates Emir My Search Content *Debug for Query :* 0.4016216 = (MATCH) weight(text:emir in 0) [DefaultSimilarity], result of: 0.4016216 = fieldWeight in 0, product of: 1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 3.2129729 = idf(docFreq=48, maxDocs=448) 0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=0) 0.4016216 = (MATCH) weight(text:emir in 0) [DefaultSimilarity], result of: 0.4016216 = fieldWeight in 0, product of: 1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of: 1.0 = termFreq=1.0 3.2129729 = idf(docFreq=48, maxDocs=448) 0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=0) *MY Schema.xml Looks like :*
Solr 3.5 Optimization takes index file size almost double
Hi, I have solr server 1.4.1 with index file size 428GB.Now When I upgrade solr Server 1.4.1 to Solr 3.5.0 by replication method. Size remains same. But when optimize index for Solr 3.5.0 instance its size reaches 791GB.so what is solutions for size remains same or lesser. I optimize Solr 3.5 with Query: /update?optimize=true&commit=true Thanks & regards Viresh Modi -- -- This email and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this email and highlight the error.
Re: Solr 3.5 Optimization takes index file size almost double
Thanks Rafal for reply... I agree with you. But Actually After optimization , it does not reduce size and it remains double. so is there any thing we missed or need to do for achieving index size reduction ? Is there any special setting we need to configure for replication? On 13 June 2013 16:53, Rafał Kuć wrote: > Hello! > > Optimize command needs to rewrite the segments, so while it is > still working you may see the index size to be doubled. However after > it is finished the index size will be usually lowered comparing to the > index size before optimize. > > -- > Regards, > Rafał Kuć > Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - ElasticSearch > > > Hi, > > I have solr server 1.4.1 with index file size 428GB.Now When I upgrade > solr > > Server 1.4.1 to Solr 3.5.0 by replication method. Size remains same. > > But when optimize index for Solr 3.5.0 instance its size reaches 791GB.so > > what is solutions for size remains same or lesser. > > I optimize Solr 3.5 with Query: > > /update?optimize=true&commit=true > > > Thanks & regards > > Viresh Modi > > -- -- This email and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this email and highlight the error.
Re: Solr 3.5 Optimization takes index file size almost double
Hi pravin I have nearly 2 TB Disk space for optimization.And after optimization get response of Qtime nearly 7hours (Obvious which in milisecond).So i think not issue of disk space. Thanks& Regards, Viresh modi Mobile: 91 (0) 9714567430 On 14 June 2013 20:10, Pravin Bhutada wrote: > Hi Viresh, > > How much free disc space do you have? if you have dont have enough space > on disc, optimization process stops and rollsback to some intermediate > state. > > > Pravin > > > > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:50 AM, Viresh Modi < > viresh.m...@highqsolutions.com > > wrote: > > > Hi Rafal > > > > Here i attached solr index file snapshot as well .. > > So can you look into this and any another information required regarding > > it then let me know. > > > > > > Thanks& Regards, > > Viresh modi > > Mobile: 91 (0) 9714567430 > > > > > > On 13 June 2013 17:41, Rafał Kuć wrote: > > > >> Hello! > >> > >> Do you have some backup after commit in your configuration? It would > >> also be good to see how your index directory looks like, can you list > >> that ? > >> > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> Rafał Kuć > >> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - ElasticSearch > >> > >> > Thanks Rafal for reply... > >> > >> > I agree with you. But Actually After optimization , it does not reduce > >> size > >> > and it remains double. so is there any thing we missed or need to do > for > >> > achieving index size reduction ? > >> > >> > Is there any special setting we need to configure for replication? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On 13 June 2013 16:53, Rafał Kuć wrote: > >> > >> >> Hello! > >> >> > >> >> Optimize command needs to rewrite the segments, so while it is > >> >> still working you may see the index size to be doubled. However after > >> >> it is finished the index size will be usually lowered comparing to > the > >> >> index size before optimize. > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Regards, > >> >> Rafał Kuć > >> >> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - ElasticSearch > >> >> > >> >> > Hi, > >> >> > I have solr server 1.4.1 with index file size 428GB.Now When I > >> upgrade > >> >> solr > >> >> > Server 1.4.1 to Solr 3.5.0 by replication method. Size remains > same. > >> >> > But when optimize index for Solr 3.5.0 instance its size reaches > >> 791GB.so > >> >> > what is solutions for size remains same or lesser. > >> >> > I optimize Solr 3.5 with Query: > >> >> > /update?optimize=true&commit=true > >> >> > >> >> > Thanks & regards > >> >> > Viresh Modi > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > > This email and its attachments are intended for the above named only and > > may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no > > action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please > > reply to this email and highlight the error. > > > -- -- This email and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this email and highlight the error.
