Additionally, I don't think this gets us what we want with multiValued
fields. It tells if a multiValued field matched, but not which value
out of the multiple values matched. I am beginning to suspect that
this information can't be returned and we may have to restructure our
schema.
-Tim
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Sascha Szott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure if debugQuery=on is a feasible solution in a productive
> environment, as generating such extra information requires a reasonable
> amount of computation.
>
> -Sascha
>
> Jon Baer wrote:
>>
>> Does the standard debug component (?debugQuery=on) give you what you need?
>>
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#Why_does_id:archangel_come_before_id:hawkgirl_when_querying_for_.22wings.22
>>
>> - Jon
>>
>> On May 14, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Tim Garton wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>> I've searched around for help with something we are trying to do
>>> and haven't come across much. We are running solr 1.4. Here is a
>>> summary of the issue we are facing:
>>>
>>> A simplified example of our schema is something like this:
>>>
>>> >> required="true" />
>>> >> required="true" />
>>>
>>> >> stored="true" multiValued="true" />
>>> >> stored="true" multiValued="true" />
>>> >> stored="true" multiValued="true" />
>>>
>>> When someone does a search we search across the title,
>>> supplement_title, and supplement_pdf_text fields. When we get our
>>> results, we would like to be able to tell which field the search
>>> matched and if it's a multiValued field, which of the multiple values
>>> matched. This is so that we can display results similar to:
>>>
>>> Example Title
>>> Example Supplement Title
>>> Example Supplement Title 2 (your search matched this document)
>>> Example Supplement Title 3
>>>
>>> Example Title 2
>>> Example Supplement Title 4
>>> Example Supplement Title 5
>>> Example Supplement Title 6 (your search matched this document)
>>>
>>> etc.
>>>
>>> How would you recommend doing this? Is there some way to get solr to
>>> tell us which field matched, including multiValued fields? As a
>>> workaround we have been using highlighting to tell which field
>>> matched, but it doesn't get us what we want for multiValued fields and
>>> there is a significant cost to enabling the highlighting. Should we
>>> design our schema in some other fashion to achieve these results?
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> -Tim
>>
>
>