Re: highlight and wildcards ?
I fixed this problem by returning this"return super.getPrefixQuery(field, termStr);" in solr.search.SolrQueryParser and it worked for me. -Kamran Mike Klaas wrote: > > On 7-Jun-07, at 5:27 PM, Frédéric Glorieux wrote: > >> Hoss, >> >> Thanks for all your information and pointers. I know that my >> problems are not mainstream. > > Have you tried commenting out getPrefixQuery in > solr.search.SolrQueryParser? It should then revert to a "regular" > lucene prefix query. > > -Mike > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/highlight-and-wildcards---tf3883191.html#a13632571 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Making stemming dynamic at query time
Stemming both at indexing and query time will be controled by solrconfig.xml, but I think it would be great if we could dynamiclly control this during search if we want to search with stemming or not. any thought? feasibilty? ... Thanks, -Kamran -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Making-stemming-dynamic-at-query-time-tp14405260p14405260.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Making stemming dynamic at query time
The easiest is probably to have two copies of your field, using , one stemmed and one not, and search in one or the other. -Bertrand Yes, I knew this, but it costs me too much, in my case having more than 65M records and saving most of the fields inside the index for highlighting purpose does not work. I am looking for making it as option. it is good to have index everything stemmed but at query time make it optional to filter query stemmed or not Thanks, -Kamran -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Making-stemming-dynamic-at-query-time-tp14405260p14418260.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Making stemming dynamic at query time
Kamran, I think Bertrand's suggestion is the only possible solution. I can't think of a way you can not stem at index time and make it an option at search time. If you look at and understand low-level/basic indexing and term matching process, I think you'll see why this seems impossible. But maybe somebody will come up with a clever suggestion. :) Otis Hi Otis, Thanks for your response, I think there is a misunderstanding, my question is just making stemming as option by passing a value to request handler for a database already been indexed with stemming. if you are familiar with fast search engine they provide this feature. I think making this happen should not be a big deal as we do alot of filtering and alteration to query during query time, we could do the same for stemming in the same way. Thanks again, -Kamran -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Making-stemming-dynamic-at-query-time-tp14405260p14440871.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Enhancing the query language
The kind usage we have in our seaching the contents "news" we need a more sofisticated query language. currently the solr query language is not enough for our needs. I understand it is possible to add our own customized query parse to the system, but I was wondering if anybody have done that and if there is any idea to share how and from where to start. for example we need to have : paragraphs proximity i.e. (termsgroup1) near/n (termgroup2) termsgroup1 n paragraph apart from termgroup2 finding terms for number of times i.e. atleast/n abcd in text abcd should show up atleast n times Thanks, Kamran shadkhast -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Enhancing-the-query-language-tp16824860p16824860.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
