Highlighting priority

2014-06-04 Thread Erwin Gunadi
Hi,

 

We are currently using Solr 4.3 and have highlighting activated on three
different fields using FVH.

 

Is it possible with Solr to prioritize highlighting for these fields ?

I mean, how to configure Solr, when it's possible highlight the keywords
from the first field, and highlight the rest of the keywords on the second
field and so on.

   

Is there any "Way Of Solr" for doing this ?

 

Thank you and Best Regards

Erwin



Highlighting priority

2014-06-04 Thread Erwin Gunadi
Hi,


We are currently using Solr 4.3 and have highlighting activated on three
different fields using FVH.



Is it possible with Solr to prioritize highlighting for these fields ?

I mean, how to configure Solr, when it’s possible highlight the keywords
from the first field, and highlight the rest of the keywords on the second
field and so on.



Is there any “Way Of Solr” for doing this ?



Thank you and Best Regards
Erwin


Solr Highlighting Best Practices Guideline

2013-10-29 Thread Erwin Gunadi
Hi,

After having done the official Solr-Tutorial 
(https://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_5_1/) and read the Solr-Reference-Guide 
(https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/lucene/solr/ref-guide/), I would like to 
ask whether someone can point me to best practices and/or tutorial on how to 
setup the highlighting function in Solr the right way ? 
I have googled but cannot find any relevant results.  

Could someone share her/his experience in using standard highlighther, fast 
vector highlighter and posting highlighter ?

Thanks for every hints.



RE: Solr Highlighting Best Practices Guideline

2013-10-29 Thread Erwin Gunadi
Hi Furkan,

thanks for the reply. 
I was trying to get some guidelines on how to apply highlighter types correctly 
and maybe some comparison results between the three highlighter types (standard 
highlighter, fast vector highlighter and posting highlighter)

Best Regards
Erwin

-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI [mailto:furkankam...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 12:56 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr Highlighting Best Practices Guideline

This is a too broad question. If you have specific questions or want to see 
other users' problems about highlighting feature at Solr you can check
here:
http://search-lucene.com/?q=highlighting&fc_project=Solr&fc_type=mail+_hash_+user
On the other hand you can read Using Additional Solr Functionalities section at 
Apache Solr Cookbook.

29 Ekim 2013 Salı tarihinde Erwin Gunadi  adlı 
kullanıcı şöyle yazdı:
> Hi,
>
> After having done the official Solr-Tutorial (
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_5_1/) and read the Solr-Reference-Guide ( 
https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/lucene/solr/ref-guide/), I would like to 
ask whether someone can point me to best practices and/or tutorial on how to 
setup the highlighting function in Solr the right way ?
> I have googled but cannot find any relevant results.
>
> Could someone share her/his experience in using standard highlighther,
fast vector highlighter and posting highlighter ?
>
> Thanks for every hints.
>
>


RE: Solr Highlighting Best Practices Guideline

2013-10-29 Thread Erwin Gunadi
Hi Jack,

thank you for the hint.

Best Regards
Erwin

-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 4:14 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr Highlighting Best Practices Guideline

There are some detailed examples in my e-book as well.

-- Jack Krupansky

-Original Message-
From: Erwin Gunadi
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 8:21 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr Highlighting Best Practices Guideline

Hi Furkan,

thanks for the reply.
I was trying to get some guidelines on how to apply highlighter types correctly 
and maybe some comparison results between the three highlighter types (standard 
highlighter, fast vector highlighter and posting
highlighter)

Best Regards
Erwin

-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI [mailto:furkankam...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 12:56 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr Highlighting Best Practices Guideline

This is a too broad question. If you have specific questions or want to see 
other users' problems about highlighting feature at Solr you can check
here:
http://search-lucene.com/?q=highlighting&fc_project=Solr&fc_type=mail+_hash_+user
On the other hand you can read Using Additional Solr Functionalities section at 
Apache Solr Cookbook.

29 Ekim 2013 Salı tarihinde Erwin Gunadi  adlı 
kullanıcı şöyle yazdı:
> Hi,
>
> After having done the official Solr-Tutorial (
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_5_1/) and read the Solr-Reference-Guide ( 
https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/lucene/solr/ref-guide/), I would like to 
ask whether someone can point me to best practices and/or tutorial on how to 
setup the highlighting function in Solr the right way ?
> I have googled but cannot find any relevant results.
>
> Could someone share her/his experience in using standard highlighther,
fast vector highlighter and posting highlighter ?
>
> Thanks for every hints.
>
> 



Performance problem on Solr query on stemmed values

2014-02-25 Thread Erwin Gunadi
Hi,

 

I would like to know whether anyone have experienced this kind of phenomena.

 

We are having performance problem regarding query on stemmed value.

I've documented the symptoms which I'm currently facing:

 


Search on field content

Search on field spell

Highlighting (on content field)

Processing speed


active

active

Active

Slow


active

not active

Active

Fast


active

active

not active

Fast


not active

active

Active

Slow


not active

active

not active

Fast

 

*Fast means 1000x faster than "slow".

 

Field Content is our index field, which holds original text, and spell is
the field with stemmed value.

According to my measurement result, search on both fields (stemmed and not
stemmed) is really fast.

But when I start to take highlighting into our query it takes too long to
process.

 

Best Regards

Erwin



RE: Performance problem on Solr query on stemmed values

2014-02-26 Thread Erwin Gunadi
Hi Erick,

thank you for the reply.
Yes, I'm using the fast vector highlighter (Solr 4.3). Every request should
only deliver 10 results.

Here is my schema configuration on both field:





































 



Field content contains in average around 5000 - 6000 words (only rough
estimation).

Best regards
Erwin




-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 3:27 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance problem on Solr query on stemmed values

Right, highlighting may have to re-analyze the input in order to return the
highlighted data. This will be significantly slower than the search,
especially if you have a large number of rows you're returning.

You can get better performance in highlighting by using
FastVectorHighlighter. See:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/FastVector+Highlighter

1000x is unusual, though, unless your fields are very large or you're
returning a lot of documents.

Best,
Erick


On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Erwin Gunadi wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> I would like to know whether anyone have experienced this kind of 
> phenomena.
>
>
>
> We are having performance problem regarding query on stemmed value.
>
> I've documented the symptoms which I'm currently facing:
>
>
>
>
> Search on field content
>
> Search on field spell
>
> Highlighting (on content field)
>
> Processing speed
>
>
> active
>
> active
>
> Active
>
> Slow
>
>
> active
>
> not active
>
> Active
>
> Fast
>
>
> active
>
> active
>
> not active
>
> Fast
>
>
> not active
>
> active
>
> Active
>
> Slow
>
>
> not active
>
> active
>
> not active
>
> Fast
>
>
>
> *Fast means 1000x faster than "slow".
>
>
>
> Field Content is our index field, which holds original text, and spell 
> is the field with stemmed value.
>
> According to my measurement result, search on both fields (stemmed and 
> not
> stemmed) is really fast.
>
> But when I start to take highlighting into our query it takes too long 
> to process.
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Erwin
>
>