Re: MorphlineSolrSink
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Rajesh Jain wrote: > Newbie question: > > I have a Flume server, where I am writing to sink which is a RollingFile > Sink. > > I have to take this files from the sink and send it to Solr which can index > and provide search. > > Do I need to configure MorphineSolrSink? > Yes > > What is the mechanism's to do this or send this data over to Solr. > More details here http://flume.apache.org/FlumeUserGuide.html#morphlinesolrsink As suggested, please move further related question to Flume User ML. > > Thanks, > Rajesh > -- thanks ashish Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
Question about Stemmer
Hello, I am using Stemmer on a Ngram field. I am getting better results with Stemmer factory after Ngram, but I was wondering what is the recommended practice when using Stemmer on Ngram field? Regards, Ashish
Multiple concurrent queries to Solr
Hello, I want to run few Solr queries in parallel, which are being done in a multi-threaded model now. I was wondering if there are any client libraries to query Solr through a non-blocking I/O mechanism instead of a threaded model. Has anyone attempted something like this? Regards, Ashish
Re: Multiple concurrent queries to Solr
Thanks, everyone. Arcadius, that ticket is interesting. I was wondering if an implementation of SolrClient could be based on HttpAsyncClient instead of HttpSolrClient. Just a thought right now, which needs to be explored deeper. - Ashish On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Arcadius Ahouansou wrote: > Hello Ashish. > > Therse is an unfinished work about this at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3383 > > Maybe you want to have a look and contribute? > > Arcadius. > > On 23 August 2015 at 17:02, Walter Underwood > wrote: > > > The last time that I used the HTTPClient library, it was non-blocking. It > > doesn’t try to read from the socket until you ask for data from the > > response object. That allows parallel requests without threads. > > > > Underneath, it has a pool of connections that can be reused. If the pool > > is exhausted, it can block. > > > > wunder > > Walter Underwood > > wun...@wunderwood.org > > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > > > > > > On Aug 23, 2015, at 8:49 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > > > > > On 8/23/2015 7:46 AM, Ashish Mukherjee wrote: > > >> I want to run few Solr queries in parallel, which are being done in a > > >> multi-threaded model now. I was wondering if there are any client > > libraries > > >> to query Solr through a non-blocking I/O mechanism instead of a > > threaded > > >> model. Has anyone attempted something like this? > > > > > > The only client library that the Solr project makes is SolrJ -- the > > > client for Java. If you are not using the SolrJ client, then the Solr > > > project did not write it, and you should contact the authors of the > > > library directly. > > > > > > SolrJ and Solr are both completely thread-safe, and multiple threads > are > > > recommended for highly concurrent usage. SolrJ uses HttpClient for > > > communication with Solr. > > > > > > I was not able to determine whether the default httpclient settings > will > > > result in non-blocking I/O or not. As far as I am aware, nothing in > > > SolrJ sets any explicit configuration for blocking or non-blocking I/O. > > > You can create your own HttpClient object in a SolrJ program and have > > > the SolrClient object use it. > > > > > > HttpClient uses HttpCore. Here is the main web page for these > > components: > > > > > > https://hc.apache.org/ > > > > > > On this webpage, it says "HttpCore supports two I/O models: blocking > I/O > > > model based on the classic Java I/O and non-blocking, event driven I/O > > > model based on Java NIO." There is no information here about which > > > model is chosen by default. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Shawn > > > > > > > > > > -- > Arcadius Ahouansou > Menelic Ltd | Information is Power > M: 07908761999 > W: www.menelic.com > --- >
Solr score distribution usage
Hello, I would like to use the Solr score distribution to pick up most relevant documents from the search result. Rather than top n results, I am interested only in picking up the most relevant based on statistical distribution of the scores. A brief study of some sample searches (the most frequently searched terms) on my data-set shows that the mode and median scores seem to coincide or be very close together. Is this the kind of trend which is generally observed in Solr (though I understand variations on specific searches)? Hence, I was considering using statistical mode as the threshold above which I use the documents from the result. Has anyone done something like this before or would like to critique my approach? Regards, Ashish
SpellCheck component query
Hello, I have enabled the Spellcheck component in Solr, which gives me spelling suggestions. However, I would like those suggestions to be applied in the same select request handler to retrieve additional results based on the suggestions. How can this be achieved with Solr? Regards, Ashish
Re: SpellCheck component query
Hi Aman, Thanks for your response. Taking your example further to elaborate what I am looking to do - if user types 'chai' and suggestion is 'chat' , then I would like to see all the values which 'chat' in them as suggestions, such as 'text chat', 'video chat', 'audio chat' etc. without making another search request for 'chat'. Can this be accomplished? Regards, Ashish On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Aman Tandon wrote: > Hi, > > AFAIK solr currently not providing this feature. > > Suppose a scenario, the user is trying to search for "chai" (hindi meaning > of tea). And in your index you have more documents containing the keyword > "chat" as compared to the the keyword "chai". > > chat => 501 > chai => 29 > > and the maxQueryFrequency is 25. > > So solr will suggest you chat as this term is present in more documents and > if you want from solr to search internally for the suggestion then you will > be displaying he results of chat to the user when the user intended to > search for chai. > > So I suppose it is good to show wrong suggestion instead of providing the > inappropriate results to the user. > > In this case you could the show the chat and chai as suggestion to the user > and then he could select the appropriate suggestion. > > With Regards > Aman Tandon > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Ashish Mukherjee < > ashish.mukher...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I have enabled the Spellcheck component in Solr, which gives me spelling > > suggestions. However, I would like those suggestions to be applied in the > > same select request handler to retrieve additional results based on the > > suggestions. How can this be achieved with Solr? > > > > Regards, > > Ashish > > >
Solr phonetics with spelling
Hello, Couple of questions related to phonetics - 1. If I enable the phonetic filter in managed-schema file for a particular field, how does it affect the spell handler? 2. What is the meaning of the inject attribute within in managed-schema? The documentation is not very clear about it. Regards, Ashish
Chaining components in request handler
Hello, I would like to create a request handler which chains components in a particular sequence to return the result, similar to a Unix pipe. eg. Component 1 -> result1 -> Component 2 -> result2 result2 is final result returned. Component 1 may be a standard component, Component 2 may be out of the box. Is there any tutorial which describes how to wire together components like this in a single handler? Regards, Ashish
Re: Chaining components in request handler
Would like to do it during querying. Thanks, Ashish On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > Is that during indexing or during query phase? > > Indexing has UpdateRequestProcessors (e.g. > http://www.solr-start.com/info/update-request-processors/ ) > Query has Components (e.g. Faceting, MoreLIkeThis, etc) > > Or something different? > > Regards, >Alex. > > Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter: > http://www.solr-start.com/ > > > On 10 March 2015 at 13:34, Ashish Mukherjee > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I would like to create a request handler which chains components in a > > particular sequence to return the result, similar to a Unix pipe. > > > > eg. Component 1 -> result1 -> Component 2 -> result2 > > > > result2 is final result returned. > > > > Component 1 may be a standard component, Component 2 may be out of the > box. > > > > Is there any tutorial which describes how to wire together components > like > > this in a single handler? > > > > Regards, > > Ashish >
Solr Start-Up Error
ader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:362) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:361) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:357) at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:760) at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:142) at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:467) at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$100(URLClassLoader.java:73) at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:368) at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:362) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:361) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:357) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.Loader.loadClass(Loader.java:86) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$JettyXmlConfiguration.nodeClass(XmlConfiguration.java:368) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$JettyXmlConfiguration.configure(XmlConfiguration.java:306) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.configure(XmlConfiguration.java:259) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:1498) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:1435) ... 7 more Usage: java -jar start.jar [options] [properties] [configs] java -jar start.jar --help # for more information [root@sys-77402 bin]# Thanks Ashish
Facing Issue in SOLR 6.6 Indexing - solr unexpected eof in prolog
Hello Everyone, I am trying the new Solr 6.6 and using SolrPhpClient to create index having info in an array. $parts = array( '0' => array( 'id' => '0060248025', 'name' => 'Falling Up', 'author' => 'Shel Silverstein', 'inStock' => true, ), '1' => array( 'id' => '0679805273', 'name' => 'Oh, The Places You will Go', 'author' => 'Dr. Seuss', 'inStock' => false, ) ); But I am facing an error "solr unexpected eof in prolog". The final XML formed and going for indexing is ... 0060248025Falling UpShel Silverstein10679805273Oh, The Places You will GoDr. Seuss I am not getting what the issue is & how to resolve. Can anyone help? Also, I have tried picking one node and added the same in the example xml and tried indexing using command and that is working fine. So seems there is no issue with the info I am providing. Please help! ThanksAshish
search on date field
I want to search on single date field e.g. q=creationDate:2009-01-24T15:00:00.000Z&rows=10 But I think the query gets terminated after T15 as ':' ( COLON ) is taken as termination character. Any ideas on how to search on single date or for that matter if query data contains COLON then how to search. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/search-on-date-field-tp22364587p22364587.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
index multi valued field into multiple fields
I have a multi valued field as follows: I want to index the data from this field into following fields How can this be done?? Any ideas... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/index-multi-valued-field-into-multiple-fields-tp22364915p22364915.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
supported document types
What are the types of documents types ( Mime types ) supported for indexing and searching in solr. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/supported-document-types-tp22366114p22366114.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: search on date field
It works thanks Ashish Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Ashish P wrote: > >> >> I want to search on single date field >> e.g. q=creationDate:2009-01-24T15:00:00.000Z&rows=10 >> >> But I think the query gets terminated after T15 as ':' ( COLON ) is taken >> as >> termination character. >> >> Any ideas on how to search on single date or for that matter if query >> data >> contains COLON then how to search. > > > You can escape the ':' character by preceding it with a back slash '\'. > e,g, > > q=creationDate:2009-01-24T15\:00\:00.000Z > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-search-on-date-field-tp22365586p22366358.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: index multi valued field into multiple fields
OK. so basically what you are saying is when you use copyField, it will copy the whole data from one field to other many fields but it can not copy part of data to other field. Because within same tokenizing ( when I am tokenizing "condition" field ) I want part of data to go into content field and part of data to go into tsdatetime field. But that looks like not possible. The field "condition" is actually mix of multiple data values. Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Ashish P wrote: > >> >> I have a multi valued field as follows: >> > >> name="condition"> >> >> I want to index the data from this field into following fields >> >> >> >> How can this be done?? Any ideas... > > > Use a copyField (look at the schema shipped with solr for an example). > > However, you can copy individual values from a multi-valued field into two > different fields. The copyField of a multi-valued field should also be > multi-valued otherwise it will retain only the last value. > > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/index-multi-valued-field-into-multiple-fields-tp22364915p22366393.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: index multi valued field into multiple fields
hmm. I think I will just do that. Thanks for clearing my doubt... -Ashish Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Ashish P > wrote: > >> >> OK. so basically what you are saying is when you use copyField, it will >> copy >> the whole data from one field to other many fields but it can not copy >> part >> of data to other field. > > > Yes, it will try to copy all the data. > > >> >> Because within same tokenizing ( when I am tokenizing "condition" field ) >> I >> want part of data to go into content field and part of data to go into >> tsdatetime field. But that looks like not possible. >> The field "condition" is actually mix of multiple data values. >> > > Why not send both values to different fields at index time explicitly? > > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/index-multi-valued-field-into-multiple-fields-tp22364915p22366918.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
problem using dataimporthandler
I am getting following exception on configuring dataImporthandler in
SolrConfig.xml
INFO: Processing configuration from solrconfig.xml: {config=data-config.xml}
[Fatal Error] :1:1: Content is not allowed in prolog.
Mar 9, 2009 12:01:37 PM org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandler
inf
orm
SEVERE: Exception while loading DataImporter
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException: Exception
occurre
d while initializing context Processing Document #
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter.loadDataConfig(DataIm
porter.java:176)
Please let me know if any clues..
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/problem-using-dataimporthandler-tp22406450p22406450.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: problem using dataimporthandler
Hi
Following is the data-config.xml
Not sure what is the error here, really stuck...
Thanks,
Ashish
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
>
> can u paste the data-config.xml
> looks like there are some errors in the xml.
> --Noble
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Ashish P wrote:
>>
>> I am getting following exception on configuring dataImporthandler in
>> SolrConfig.xml
>>
>> INFO: Processing configuration from solrconfig.xml:
>> {config=data-config.xml}
>> [Fatal Error] :1:1: Content is not allowed in prolog.
>> Mar 9, 2009 12:01:37 PM
>> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandler
>> inf
>> orm
>> SEVERE: Exception while loading DataImporter
>> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException: Exception
>> occurre
>> d while initializing context Processing Document #
>> at
>> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter.loadDataConfig(DataIm
>> porter.java:176)
>>
>> Please let me know if any clues..
>> Thanks
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/problem-using-dataimporthandler-tp22406450p22406450.html
>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --Noble Paul
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/problem-using-dataimporthandler-tp22406450p22407391.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Querying DB indexed data
Hi, I performed steps given in http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler to index data from database. the data-config.xml is now I am able to view data that is indexed using URL http://localhost:8080/solr/admin/dataimport.jsp to see the data as - user1 - 0 - CN=user1,OU=R&D But when I search user_name:user1 then the result is not returned at all. Am I missing something here??? Please help. Thanks, Ashish -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Querying-DB-indexed-data-tp22428120p22428120.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Querying DB indexed data
In schema xml, I have defined following... Thanks, Ashish Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Ashish P > wrote: > >> now I am able to view data that is indexed using URL >> http://localhost:8080/solr/admin/dataimport.jsp to see the data as >> >> - >> user1 >> >> - >> 0 >> >> - >> CN=user1,OU=R&D >> >> >> >> But when I search user_name:user1 then the result is not returned at all. >> > > What is the type of the user_name field as defined in schema.xml? > > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Querying-DB-indexed-data-tp22428120p22428239.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Querying DB indexed data
Oh looks like some other big problem, Now I am not able to see other text data I indexed before adding DB data to index... Can not search any data...But I am sure I was able to search before adding DB to index Any pointers??? Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Ashish P > wrote: > >> >> >> In schema xml, I have defined following... >> >>> stored="true" /> >>> stored="true" /> >> Thanks, >> Ashish >> >> > If you search for *:* from the admin, do you see documents with user_name > name1 present? > > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Querying-DB-indexed-data-tp22428120p22428364.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Querying DB indexed data
yes I did full import. so previous docs are gone as you said. But when I do http://localhost:8080/solr/dataimport I get following response - 0 0 - - my-dataConfig.xml idle - 1 119 0 2009-03-10 14:49:58 Indexing completed. Added/Updated: 0 documents. Deleted 0 documents. 2009-03-10 14:49:58 2009-03-10 14:49:58 0:0:0.141 This response format is experimental. It is likely to change in the future. I shows imported row numbers, indexing complete buts adds 0 documents. Does that suggest anything.. Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Ashish P > wrote: > >> >> Oh looks like some other big problem, Now I am not able to see other text >> data I indexed before adding DB data to index... >> Can not search any data...But I am sure I was able to search before >> adding >> DB to index >> Any pointers??? >> >> > So you added some documents before running a full-import with > DataImportHandler? When you do a full-import, all previous documents are > deleted. That may be a reason. > > However, there should be some documents which DataImportHandler created. > > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Querying-DB-indexed-data-tp22428120p22428518.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Querying DB indexed data
Hi Shalin, Got the answer. I had uniquekey defined in schema.xml but that was not present in any columns hence problem for indexing. Thanks a lot for your help buddy. Cheers, Ashish Ashish P wrote: > > yes I did full import. so previous docs are gone as you said. > But when I do http://localhost:8080/solr/dataimport I get following > response > > > - > 0 > 0 > > - > - > my-dataConfig.xml > > > idle > > - > 1 > 119 > 0 > 2009-03-10 14:49:58 > Indexing completed. Added/Updated: 0 documents. Deleted 0 > documents. > 2009-03-10 14:49:58 > 2009-03-10 14:49:58 > 0:0:0.141 > > This response format is experimental. It is likely > to change in the future. > > > I shows imported row numbers, indexing complete buts adds 0 documents. > Does that suggest anything.. > > > Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Ashish P >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Oh looks like some other big problem, Now I am not able to see other >>> text >>> data I indexed before adding DB data to index... >>> Can not search any data...But I am sure I was able to search before >>> adding >>> DB to index >>> Any pointers??? >>> >>> >> So you added some documents before running a full-import with >> DataImportHandler? When you do a full-import, all previous documents are >> deleted. That may be a reason. >> >> However, there should be some documents which DataImportHandler created. >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Shalin Shekhar Mangar. >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Querying-DB-indexed-data-tp22428120p22428615.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
SolrJ XML indexing
I have an XML file with structure : ... ... . . It is present on disk on some location let's say C:\\documents.xml Q.1. Using solrJ can I index all docs in this file directly?? or do I have to convert each document to solrInputDocument by parsing XML Q.2 How to use DirectXmlRequest?? any example Thanks in advance... Ashish -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SolrJ-XML-indexing-tp22450845p22450845.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SolrJ XML indexing
Thanks man. I just tried what u suggested but I am getting following error when performing request Mar 11, 2009 6:00:28 PM org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexWriter getDirectory WARNING: No lockType configured for C:\dw-solr\solr\./data/index/ assuming 'simple' Mar 11, 2009 6:00:29 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log SEVERE: org.apache.lucene.store.LockObtainFailedException: Lock obtain timed out: simplefsl...@c:\dw-solr\solr\.\data\index\lucene-1d6c0059ac2f9f2c83acf749af7e0906-write.lock at org.apache.lucene.store.Lock.obtain(Lock.java:85) at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.init(IndexWriter.java:1140) at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.(IndexWriter.java:938) at org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexWriter.(SolrIndexWriter.java:116) Any ideas??? -Ashish Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote: > > String xml = null;//load the file to the xml string > DirectXmlRequest up = new DirectXmlRequest( "/update", xml ); > solrServer.request( up ); > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Ashish P > wrote: >> >> I have an XML file with structure : >> >> ... >> ... >> . >> . >> >> >> It is present on disk on some location let's say C:\\documents.xml >> >> Q.1. Using solrJ can I index all docs in this file directly?? or do I >> have >> to convert each document to solrInputDocument by parsing XML >> >> Q.2 How to use DirectXmlRequest?? any example >> >> Thanks in advance... >> Ashish >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/SolrJ-XML-indexing-tp22450845p22450845.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > > -- > --Noble Paul > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SolrJ-XML-indexing-tp22450845p22451049.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SolrJ XML indexing
I added single in indexDefaults that made the error before go away but now I am getting following error : Mar 11, 2009 6:12:56 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log SEVERE: java.io.IOException: Cannot overwrite: C:\dw-solr\solr\data\index\_1o.fdt at org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectory.createOutput(FSDirectory.java:440) at org.apache.lucene.index.FieldsWriter.(FieldsWriter.java:62) at org.apache.lucene.index.StoredFieldsWriter.initFieldsWriter(StoredFieldsWriter.java:65) Please help.. Ashish P wrote: > > Thanks man. > I just tried what u suggested but I am getting following error when > performing request > Mar 11, 2009 6:00:28 PM org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexWriter > getDirectory > WARNING: No lockType configured for C:\dw-solr\solr\./data/index/ assuming > 'simple' > Mar 11, 2009 6:00:29 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log > SEVERE: org.apache.lucene.store.LockObtainFailedException: Lock obtain > timed out: > simplefsl...@c:\dw-solr\solr\.\data\index\lucene-1d6c0059ac2f9f2c83acf749af7e0906-write.lock > at org.apache.lucene.store.Lock.obtain(Lock.java:85) > at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.init(IndexWriter.java:1140) > at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.(IndexWriter.java:938) > at > org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexWriter.(SolrIndexWriter.java:116) > > Any ideas??? > > -Ashish > > > Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote: >> >> String xml = null;//load the file to the xml string >> DirectXmlRequest up = new DirectXmlRequest( "/update", xml ); >> solrServer.request( up ); >> >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Ashish P >> wrote: >>> >>> I have an XML file with structure : >>> >>> ... >>> ... >>> . >>> . >>> >>> >>> It is present on disk on some location let's say C:\\documents.xml >>> >>> Q.1. Using solrJ can I index all docs in this file directly?? or do I >>> have >>> to convert each document to solrInputDocument by parsing XML >>> >>> Q.2 How to use DirectXmlRequest?? any example >>> >>> Thanks in advance... >>> Ashish >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/SolrJ-XML-indexing-tp22450845p22450845.html >>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> --Noble Paul >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SolrJ-XML-indexing-tp22450845p22451235.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SolrJ XML indexing
Yes cleaning up works... But not sure how to avoid this happening again?? -Ashish jonbaer wrote: > > Id suggest what someone else mentioned to just do a full clean up of > the index. Sounds like you might have kill -9 or stopped the process > manually while indexing (would be only reason for a left over lock). > > - Jon > > On Mar 11, 2009, at 5:16 AM, Ashish P wrote: > >> >> I added single in indexDefaults that made the >> error >> before go away but now I am getting following error : >> >> Mar 11, 2009 6:12:56 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log >> SEVERE: java.io.IOException: Cannot overwrite: >> C:\dw-solr\solr\data\index\_1o.fdt >> at >> org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectory.createOutput(FSDirectory.java:440) >> at org.apache.lucene.index.FieldsWriter.(FieldsWriter.java:62) >> at >> org >> .apache >> .lucene >> .index.StoredFieldsWriter.initFieldsWriter(StoredFieldsWriter.java:65) >> >> Please help.. >> >> >> Ashish P wrote: >>> >>> Thanks man. >>> I just tried what u suggested but I am getting following error when >>> performing request >>> Mar 11, 2009 6:00:28 PM org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexWriter >>> getDirectory >>> WARNING: No lockType configured for C:\dw-solr\solr\./data/index/ >>> assuming >>> 'simple' >>> Mar 11, 2009 6:00:29 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log >>> SEVERE: org.apache.lucene.store.LockObtainFailedException: Lock >>> obtain >>> timed out: >>> simplefsl...@c:\dw-solr\solr\.\data\index >>> \lucene-1d6c0059ac2f9f2c83acf749af7e0906-write.lock >>> at org.apache.lucene.store.Lock.obtain(Lock.java:85) >>> at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.init(IndexWriter.java:1140) >>> at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.(IndexWriter.java:938) >>> at >>> org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexWriter.(SolrIndexWriter.java: >>> 116) >>> >>> Any ideas??? >>> >>> -Ashish >>> >>> >>> Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote: >>>> >>>> String xml = null;//load the file to the xml string >>>> DirectXmlRequest up = new DirectXmlRequest( "/update", xml ); >>>> solrServer.request( up ); >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Ashish P >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I have an XML file with structure : >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>> ... >>>>> . >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It is present on disk on some location let's say C:\\documents.xml >>>>> >>>>> Q.1. Using solrJ can I index all docs in this file directly?? or >>>>> do I >>>>> have >>>>> to convert each document to solrInputDocument by parsing XML >>>>> >>>>> Q.2 How to use DirectXmlRequest?? any example >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance... >>>>> Ashish >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> View this message in context: >>>>> http://www.nabble.com/SolrJ-XML-indexing-tp22450845p22450845.html >>>>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> --Noble Paul >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/SolrJ-XML-indexing-tp22450845p22451235.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SolrJ-XML-indexing-tp22450845p22468203.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
SolrJ : EmbeddedSolrServer and database data indexing
Is it possible to index DB data directly to solr using EmbeddedSolrServer. I tried using data-Config File and Full-import commad, it works. So assuming using CommonsHttpServer will also work. But can I do it with EmbeddedSolrServer?? Thanks in advance... Ashish -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SolrJ-%3A-EmbeddedSolrServer-and-database-data-indexing-tp22488697p22488697.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SolrJ : EmbeddedSolrServer and database data indexing
Is there any api in SolrJ that calls the dataImportHandler to execute commands like full-import and delta-import. Please help.. Ashish P wrote: > > Is it possible to index DB data directly to solr using EmbeddedSolrServer. > I tried using data-Config File and Full-import commad, it works. So > assuming using CommonsHttpServer will also work. But can I do it with > EmbeddedSolrServer?? > > Thanks in advance... > Ashish > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SolrJ-%3A-EmbeddedSolrServer-and-database-data-indexing-tp22488697p22489420.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Field tokenizer question
I have created a field, The pattern is "_" (Underscore) When I do field analysis using solr admin, it shows it correctly. Have a look at attached image. e.g. cric_info http://www.nabble.com/file/p22594575/field%2Banalysis.jpeg But when I search the field, like searchbam:cric, it returns zero results. I am expecting that I should be able to search on cric and info both individually. But the response is : - 0 47 - on 0 searchbam:cric 10 2.2 The index is properly committed. Am I missing something here? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Field-tokenizer-question-tp22594575p22594575.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Field tokenizer question
Hey it works. Can you please tell me the reason?? Thanks, Ashish Koji Sekiguchi-2 wrote: > > Ashish P wrote: >> I have created a field, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Set class="solr.TextField" instead of class="solr.StrField" in your > fieldType definition. > Then reindex and commit. > > Koji > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Field-tokenizer-question-tp22594575p22653356.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Dynamic range Facets
my documents (products) have a price field, and I want to have a "dynamically" calculated range facet for that in the response. E.g. I want to have this in the response price:[* TO 20] -> 23 price:[20 TO 40] -> 42 price:[40 TO *] -> 33 if prices are between 0 and 60 but price:[* TO 100] -> 23 price:[100 TO 200] -> 42 price:[200 TO *] -> 33 if prices are between 0 and 300 So the question is how to get the dynamic facets response from solr. This is same question as previously posted back in 2007. But still waits an answer?? Is there any solution on this?? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Dynamic-range-Facets-tp22675413p22675413.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
search individual words but facet on delimiter
I want following output from solr: I index a field with value -> A B;C D;E F I have applied a pattern tokenizer on this field because I know the value will contain ";" So it indexes A B, C D, E F properly... So I get facets A B (1) C D (1) E F (1) This is the exact output of facets I want. But I also want to search this document when I just search individual word 'A' or 'D' etc. So I want facets exactly same as above but at the same time to be able to search on individual words also. Is there a way to achieve this??? Thanks in advance, Ashish -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/search-individual-words-but-facet-on-delimiter-tp22676007p22676007.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
get all facets
Can I get all the facets in QueryResponse?? Thanks, Ashish -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/get-all-facets-tp22693809p22693809.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
numeric range facets
Similar to getting range facets for date where we specify start, end and gap. Can we do the same thing for numeric facets where we specify start, end and gap. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/numeric-range-facets-tp22698330p22698330.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: get all facets
Actually what I meant was if there are 100 indexed fields. So there are 100
facet fields right..
So whenever I create solrQuery, I have to do addFacetField("fieldName")
can I avoid this and just get all facet fields.
Sorry for the confusion.
Thanks again,
Ashish
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Ashish P
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Can I get all the facets in QueryResponse??
>
>
> You can get all the facets that are returned by the server. Set
> facet.limit
> to the number of facets you want to retrieve.
>
> See
> http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/solrj/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/SolrQuery.html#setFacetLimit(int)
> --
> Regards,
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/get-all-facets-tp22693809p22714256.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
filter query question
Consider, I have following 3 fields I want to query all documents where name:somevalue and actionuser value is not equal to creationuser value. Can we do this??? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/filter-query-question-tp22863789p22863789.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: filter query question
Thanks Shalin. Another question what is the meaning of this syntax [* TO *] Thanks, Ashish Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Ashish P wrote: > >> >> I want to query all documents where name:somevalue and actionuser value >> is >> not equal to creationuser value. >> >> Can we do this??? > > > Nope. But you can create a new field which holds true if actionuser != > creationuser and filter on that. > > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/filter-query-question-tp22863789p22864255.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
multiple tokenizers needed
I want to analyze a text based on pattern ";" and separate on whitespace and it is a Japanese text so use CJKAnalyzer + tokenizer also. in short I want to do: Can anyone please tell me how to achieve this?? Because the above syntax is not at all possible. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/multiple-tokenizers-needed-tp22982382p22982382.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
How to index the contents from SVN repository
Is there any way to index contents of SVN rep in Solr ?? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-index-the-contents-from-SVN-repository-tp23240110p23240110.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: How to index the contents from SVN repository
Right. But is there a way to track file updates and diffs. Thanks, Ashish Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote: > > If you can check it out into a directory using SVN command then you > may use DIH to index the content. > > a combination of FileListEntityProcessor and PlainTextEntityProcessor may > help > > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Ashish P > wrote: >> >> Is there any way to index contents of SVN rep in Solr ?? >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/How-to-index-the-contents-from-SVN-repository-tp23240110p23240110.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > > -- > --Noble Paul > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-index-the-contents-from-SVN-repository-tp23240110p23250220.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
half width katakana
I want to convert half width katakana to full width katakana. I tried using cjk analyzer but not working. Does cjkAnalyzer do it or is there any other way?? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/half-width-katakana-tp23270186p23270186.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: half width katakana
After this should I be using same cjkAnalyzer or use charFilter?? Thanks, Ashish Koji Sekiguchi-2 wrote: > > Ashish P wrote: >> I want to convert half width katakana to full width katakana. I tried >> using >> cjk analyzer but not working. >> Does cjkAnalyzer do it or is there any other way?? >> > > CharFilter which comes with trunk/Solr 1.4 just covers this type of > problem. > If you are using Solr 1.3, try the patch attached below: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-822 > > Koji > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/half-width-katakana-tp23270186p23270453.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: half width katakana
Koji san, Using CharStreamAwareCJKTokenizerFactory is giving me following error, SEVERE: java.lang.ClassCastException: java.io.StringReader cannot be cast to org.apache.solr.analysis.CharStream May be you are typecasting Reader to subclass. Thanks, Ashish Koji Sekiguchi-2 wrote: > > If you use CharFilter, you should use "CharStream aware" Tokenizer to > correct terms offsets. > There are two CharStreamAware*Tokenizer in trunk/Solr 1.4. > Probably you want to use CharStreamAwareCJKTokenizer(Factory). > > Koji > > > Ashish P wrote: >> After this should I be using same cjkAnalyzer or use charFilter?? >> Thanks, >> Ashish >> >> >> Koji Sekiguchi-2 wrote: >> >>> Ashish P wrote: >>> >>>> I want to convert half width katakana to full width katakana. I tried >>>> using >>>> cjk analyzer but not working. >>>> Does cjkAnalyzer do it or is there any other way?? >>>> >>>> >>> CharFilter which comes with trunk/Solr 1.4 just covers this type of >>> problem. >>> If you are using Solr 1.3, try the patch attached below: >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-822 >>> >>> Koji >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/half-width-katakana-tp23270186p23272475.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
query clause and filter query
what is the difference between query clause and filter query?? Thanks, Ashish -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/query-clause-and-filter-query-tp23629715p23629715.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
lock problem
Hi, The scenario is I have 2 different solr instances running at different locations concurrently. The data location for both instances is same: \\hostname\FileServer\CoreTeam\Research\data. Both instances use EmbeddedSolrServer and locktype at both instances is 'single'. I am getting following exception : Cannot overwrite: \\hostname\FileServer\CoreTeam\Research\data\index\_1.fdt at org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectory.createOutput(FSDirectory.java:440) at org.apache.lucene.index.FieldsWriter.(FieldsWriter.java:64) at org.apache.lucene.index.StoredFieldsWriter.initFieldsWriter(StoredFieldsWriter.java:73) I tried simple locktype also but it shows timeout exception when writing to index. Please help me out.. Thanks, Ashish -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/lock-problem-tp23663558p23663558.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
solr replication 1.3
I want to add master slave configuration for solr. I have following solr configuration: I am using solr 1.3 on windows. I am also using EmbeddedSolrServer. In this case is it possible to perform master slave configuration?? My second question is if I user solr 1.4 which has solr replication using java.. Still is it possible to do solr replication using EmbeddedSolrServer on windows?? Thanks, Ashish -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/solr-replication-1.3-tp23667360p23667360.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: solr replication 1.3
OK. And the replication available with solr 1.3 is only for unix right?? Thanks, Ashish Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्-2 wrote: > > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Ashish P > wrote: >> >> I want to add master slave configuration for solr. I have following solr >> configuration: >> I am using solr 1.3 on windows. I am also using EmbeddedSolrServer. >> In this case is it possible to perform master slave configuration?? >> >> My second question is if I user solr 1.4 which has solr replication using >> java.. >> Still is it possible to do solr replication using EmbeddedSolrServer on >> windows?? > no . The replication in 1.4 relies on http transport. for an > EmbeddedSolrServer there is no http end point >> >> Thanks, >> Ashish >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/solr-replication-1.3-tp23667360p23667360.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > > -- > - > Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/solr-replication-1.3-tp23667360p23690116.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
commit question
If I add 10 document to solrServer as in solrServer.addIndex(docs) ( Using Embedded ) and then I commit and commit fails for for some reason. Then can I retry this commit lets say after some time or the added documents are lost?? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/commit-question-tp23717415p23717415.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: commit question
Hi, Any idea if documents from solr server are cleared even if commit fails or I can still again try commit after some time?? Thanks, Ashish Ashish P wrote: > > If I add 10 document to solrServer as in solrServer.addIndex(docs) ( Using > Embedded ) and then I commit and commit fails for for some reason. Then > can I retry this commit lets say after some time or the added documents > are lost?? > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/commit-question-tp23717415p23735301.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Index replication without HTTP
Hi, I have two instances of embedded server (no http) running on a network with two separate indexes.. I want to replicate changes from one index to other. Is there any way?? Thanks, Ashish -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Index-replication-without-HTTP-tp23739156p23739156.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
lock issue
Hi, I am committing to same index from two different embedded servers. My locktype is simple and writelocktimeout is commitLockTimeout is 10. I read in a post "Update from multiple JVMs" where Hoss said this case is supported but I am getting following error. I tried single lock also but again same error. Is there anything I can do.. SEVERE: java.io.IOException: Cannot overwrite: Z:\index\_2.fdt at org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectory.createOutput(FSDirectory.java:440) at org.apache.lucene.index.FieldsWriter.(FieldsWriter.java:64) at org.apache.lucene.index.StoredFieldsWriter.initFieldsWriter(StoredFieldsWriter.java:73) at org.apache.lucene.index.StoredFieldsWriter.finishDocument(StoredFieldsWriter.java:147) at org.apache.lucene.index.StoredFieldsWriter$PerDoc.finish(StoredFieldsWriter.java:196) at org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter$WaitQueue.writeDocument(DocumentsWriter.java:1405) at org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter$WaitQueue.add(DocumentsWriter.java:1424) at org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.finishDocument(DocumentsWriter.java:1052) at org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.updateDocument(DocumentsWriter.java:750) at org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.updateDocument(DocumentsWriter.java:730) at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.updateDocument(IndexWriter.java:1898) at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.updateDocument(IndexWriter.java:1875) at org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandler2.addDoc(DirectUpdateHandler2.java:232) at org.apache.solr.update.processor.RunUpdateProcessor.processAdd(RunUpdateProcessorFactory.java:59) at org.apache.solr.handler.XmlUpdateRequestHandler.processUpdate(XmlUpdateRequestHandler.java:196) at org.apache.solr.handler.XmlUpdateRequestHandler.handleRequestBody(XmlUpdateRequestHandler.java:123) at org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:131) at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:1204) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.EmbeddedSolrServer.request(EmbeddedSolrServer.java:147) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.UpdateRequest.process(UpdateRequest.java:217) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServer.add(SolrServer.java:48) at jp.co.spectrum.insight.core.kcengine.KCIndexHandlerImpl.addIndex(KCIndexHandlerImpl.java:70) at jp.co.spectrum.insight.adapter.solr.SearchAdapter4Solr.add(SearchAdapter4Solr.java:175) at jp.co.spectrum.insight.core.searchmanager.SearchManagerImpl.appendDocuments(SearchManagerImpl.java:462) at jp.co.spectrum.insight.knowledgecenter.KnowledgeCenterManagerImpl$DataAssigner.run(KnowledgeCenterManagerImpl.java:418) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:885) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/lock-issue-tp23758268p23758268.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: lock issue
Hi Shalin, I am trying to do the same point again. You suggested to use HTTP for replication. But for performance reasons I want to use embedded. And because replication is not available with embedded approach, I am trying this i.e. from two different web applications (same network) using embedded solr giving same data dir. just trying to index. Thanks, Ashish Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Ashish P > wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> I am committing to same index from two different embedded servers. >> My locktype is simple and writelocktimeout is commitLockTimeout is >> 10. >> >> I read in a post "Update from multiple JVMs" where Hoss said this case is >> supported but I am getting following error. I tried single lock also but >> again same error. Is there anything I can do.. >> >> > One of us has definitely mis-understood Hoss. I don't think you can > simultaneously write to the same index from two different embedded solr. > You > can certainly read from both and you can write from one of them. > > The first email from Hoss said that you can update from two JVMs by > posting > requests through http. If you try to write directly to the same index, > only > one can do at one time. Simultaneous requests may fail. > > What is the use-case behind this? > > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/lock-issue-tp23758268p23758544.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
change data dir location
I want to change data dir location and not use solrConfig.xml. So on windows I removed dataDir xonfiguration from solrConfig.xml and tried setting 'solr.data.dir' system property to my location. But it looks like solr is not picking up this property on windows. Anybody experienced the same??? Please share... Thanks, Ashish -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/change-data-dir-location-tp23992946p23992946.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: change data dir location
I don't want to set in solrConfig.xml. I want solr to take from my config file or from system property. Thanks, Ashish Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्-2 wrote: > > set the value in solrconfig.xml to what you like > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Ashish P > wrote: >> >> I want to change data dir location and not use solrConfig.xml. >> So on windows I removed dataDir xonfiguration from solrConfig.xml and >> tried >> setting 'solr.data.dir' system property to my location. >> But it looks like solr is not picking up this property on windows. >> Anybody experienced the same??? >> Please share... >> Thanks, >> Ashish >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/change-data-dir-location-tp23992946p23992946.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > > -- > - > Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/change-data-dir-location-tp23992946p23993210.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
complex OR query not working
I want to execute the following query: (spacegroupID:g*) OR (!userID:g*). What I want to do here is select all docs where spacegroupID is starts with 'g' or selects docs where userId not start with 'g'. In above syntax (!userID:g*) gives results correctly. Also (spacegroupID:g*) gives results correctly. But after adding OR the results are not correct, they seem to be like from result of (spacegroupID:g*) remove the results of userID:g*. Any idea on how to achieve the goal. Thanks, Ashish -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/complex-OR-query-not-working-tp24269684p24269684.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Solr relevancy score different on replicated nodes
Hi Erick, I have updated that I am not facing this problem in a new collection. As per 3) I can try deleting a replica and adding it again, but the confusion is which one out of two should I delete.(wondering which replica is giving correct score for query) Both replicas give same number of docs while doing all query.Its strange that in query explain docCount and docFreq is differing. Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Re: Solr relevancy score different on replicated nodes
Hi Erick, Thank you for the details,but doesn't look like a time difference in autocommit caused this issue.As I said if I do retrieve all query/keyword query on both server,they returned correct number of docs,its just relevancy score is taking diff values. I waited for brief period,still discrepancy was coming(no indexing also).So I went ahead deleting the follower node(thinking leader replica should be in correct state).After adding the new replica again,the issue is not appearing. We will monitor same if it appears in future. Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Re: Solr relevancy score different on replicated nodes
Thank you Erick for explaining. In my senario, I stopped indexing and updates too and waited for 1 day. Restarted solr too.Shouldn't both replica and leader come to same state after this much long period. As you said this gets corrected by segment merging, hope it is internal process itself and no manual activity required. For us score matters as we are using it to display some scenarios on search and it gave changing values.As of now we are dependent of single shard-replica but in future we might need more replicas Will planning indexing and updates outside peak query hour help? I have tried the exact cache while debugging score difference during sharding.Didn't help much.Anyhow that's a different topic. Thanks again, Regards Ashish Bisht -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Re: Solr relevancy score different on replicated nodes
Hi Erick, Your statement "*At best, I've seen UIs where they display, say, 1 to 5 stars that are just showing the percentile that the particular doc had _relative to the max score*" is something we are trying to achieve,but we are dealing in percentages rather stars(ratings) Change in MaxScore per node is messing it. I was thinking if it possible to make one complete request(for a term) go though one replica,i.e if to the client we could tell which replica hit the first request and subsequently further paginated requests should go though that replica until keyword is changed.Do you think it is possible or a good idea?If yes is there a way in solr to know which replica served request? Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Re: Solr relevancy score different on replicated nodes
Hi Erick, To test this scenario I added replica again and from few days have been monitoring metrics like Num Docs, Max Doc, Deleted Docs from *Overview* section of core.Checked *Segments Info* section too.Everything looks in sync. http://:8983/solr/#/MyTestCollection_*shard1_replica_n7*/ http://:8983/solr/#/MyTestCollection_*4_shard1_replica_n7*/ If in future they go out of sync,just wanted to confirm if this is a bug although you mentioned as *bq. Shouldn't both replica and leader come to same state after this much long period. No. After that long, the docs will be the same, all the docs present on one replica will be present and searchable on the other. However, they will be in different segments so the "stats skew" will remain. * We need these score,so as a temporary solution if we monitor these metrics for any issues and take action (either optimize or delete-add replica) accordingly.Does it make sense? -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Re: Solr relevancy score different on replicated nodes
Hi Erick, Our business wanted score not to be totally based on default relevancy algo. Instead a mix of solr relevancy+usermetrics(80%+20%). Each result doc is calculated against max score as a fraction of 80.Remaining 20 is from user metrics. Finally sort happens on new score. But say we got first page correctly, and for the second page if the request goes to other replica where max score is different. UI may result give wrong sort as compared to first page. For e.g last value of page 1 is 70 and first value of second page can be 72 I. e distorted sorting. On top of it we are not using pagination but a infinite scroll which makes it more noticeable. Please suggest. Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Re: Solr relevancy score different on replicated nodes
Thanks Erick and everyone.We are checking on stats cache. I noticed stats skew again and optimized the index to correct the same.As per the documents. https://lucidworks.com/2017/10/13/segment-merging-deleted-documents-optimize-may-bad/ and https://lucidworks.com/2018/06/20/solr-and-optimizing-your-index-take-ii/ wanted to check on below points considering we want stats skew to be corrected. 1.When optimized single segment won't be natural merged easily.As we might be doing manual optimize every time,what I visualize is at a certain point in future we might be having a single large segment.What impact this large segment is going to have? Our index ~30k documents i.e files with content(Segment size <1Gb as of now) 1.Do you recommend going for optimize in these situations?Probably it will be done only when stats skew.Is it safe? Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Relevancy Score Calculation
Hi, Currently score is calculated based on "Max Doc" instead of "Num Docs".Is it possible to change it to "Num Docs"(i.e without deleted docs).Will it require a code change or some config change. Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Re: Relevancy Score Calculation
Thanks.I Agree. Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Spellchecker -File based vs Index based
Hi,
I am seeing difference in file based spellcheck and index based spellcheck
implementations.
Using index based
http://:8983/solr/SCSpell/spell?q=*intnet of
things*&defType=edismax&qf=spellcontent&wt=json&rows=0&spellcheck=true&spellcheck.dictionary=*default*&q.op=AND
"suggestions":[
"intnet",{
"numFound":10,
"startOffset":0,
"endOffset":6,
"origFreq
Suggestion get build up only for wrong word.
But while suing file based,they get build up for right words too which
messes collations
http://:8983/solr/SCSpell/spell?q=intnet%20of%20things&defType=edismax&qf=spellcontent&wt=json&rows=0&&spellcheck=true&spellcheck.dictionary=*file*&q.op=AND
"suggestion":["*internet*",
"contnet",
"intel",
"intent",
"intert",
"intelect",
"intended",
"intented",
"interest",
"botnets"]},
"*of*",{
"numFound":8,
"startOffset":7,
"endOffset":9,
"suggestion":["ofc",
"off",
"ohf",
.
"soft"]},
"*things*",{
"numFound":10,
"startOffset":10,
"endOffset":16,
"suggestion":["thing",
"brings",
"think",
"thinkers",
.
Is there any property in file based which I use to fix this
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Different behavior when using function queries
Can someone please explain the below behavior.For different q parameter
function query response differs although function queries are same
http://:8983/solr/SCSpell/select?q="*market
place*"&defType=edismax&qf=spellcontent&wt=json&rows=1&fl=internet_of_things:if(exists(query({!edismax
v='"internet of
things"'})),true,false),instant_of_things:if(exists(query({!edismax
v='"instant of things"'})),true,false)
Response contains function query results
"response":{"numFound":80,"start":0,"docs":[
{
"internet_of_things":false,
"instant_of_things":false}]
}}
wheras for different q
http://:8983/solr/SCSpell/select?q="*intent of
things*"&defType=edismax&qf=spellcontent&wt=json&rows=1&fl=internet_of_things:if(exists(query({!edismax
v='"internet of
things"'})),true,false),instant_of_things:if(exists(query({!edismax
v='"instant of things"'})),true,false)
Response doesnot contain function query results
"response":{"numFound":0,"start":0,"docs":[]
}}
>From the results it looks like if the results of q doesn't yield result
function queries don't work.
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Behavior of Function Query
Please see the below requests and response
http://Sol:8983/solr/SCSpell/select?q="*internet of
things*"&defType=edismax&qf=spellcontent&wt=json&rows=1&fl=score,internet_of_things:query({!edismax
v='"*internet of things*"'}),instant_of_things:query({!edismax v='"instant
of things"'})
Response contains score from function query
"fl":"score,internet_of_things:query({!edismax v='\"internet of
things\"'}),instant_of_things:query({!edismax v='\"instant of things\"'})",
"rows":"1",
"wt":"json"}},
"response":{"numFound":851,"start":0,"maxScore":7.6176834,"docs":[
{
"score":7.6176834,
* "internet_of_things":7.6176834*}]
}}
But if in the same request q is changed,it doesn't give score
http://Sol-1:8983/solr/SCSpell/select?q="*wall
street*"&defType=edismax&qf=spellcontent&wt=json&rows=1&fl=score,internet_of_things:query({!edismax
v='"*internet of things*"'}),instant_of_things:query({!edismax v='"instant
of things"'})
"q":"\"wall street\"",
"defType":"edismax",
"qf":"spellcontent",
"fl":"score,internet_of_things:query({!edismax v='\"internet of
things\"'}),instant_of_things:query({!edismax v='\"instant of things\"'})",
"rows":"1",
"wt":"json"}},
"response":{"numFound":46,"start":0,"maxScore":15.670144,"docs":[
{
"score":15.670144}]
}}
Why score of function query is getting applied when q is a different.
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Re: Spellchecker -File based vs Index based
Spellcheck configuration is default one.. solr.FileBasedSpellChecker file spellings.txt UTF-8 ./spellcheckerFile default jkdefault file on true 10 5 5 true 10 true 10 5 Also the words are present in the file..For e.g things word which is corrected is present inside file.Also the suggestions related to it are present. *I don't want suggestions for right word (of,things)..Any problem with request .Tried two combinations.* 1./spell?spellcheck.q=intnet of things&spellcheck=true&spellcheck.collateParam.q.op=AND&df=spellcontent&spellcheck.dictionary=file 2./spell?q=intnet of things&defType=edismax&qf=spellcontent&wt=json&rows=0&&spellcheck=true&spellcheck.dictionary=file&q.op=AND Please suggest -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Re: Spellchecker -File based vs Index based
Spellcheck configuration is default one.. solr.FileBasedSpellChecker file spellings.txt UTF-8 ./spellcheckerFile default jkdefault file on true 10 5 5 true 10 true 10 5 Also the words are present in the file..For e.g things word which is corrected is present inside file.Also the suggestions related to it are present. I don't want suggestions for right word (of,things)..Any problem with request .Tried two combinations. 1./spell?spellcheck.q=intnet of things&spellcheck=true&spellcheck.collateParam.q.op=AND&df=spellcontent&spellcheck.dictionary=file 2.spell?q=intnet of things&defType=edismax&qf=spellcontent&wt=json&rows=0&&spellcheck=true&spellcheck.dictionary=file&q.op=AND Please suggest -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Stopwords param of edismax parser not working
Hi, We are trying to remove stopwords from analysis using edismax parser parameter.The documentation says *stopwords A Boolean parameter indicating if the StopFilterFactory configured in the query analyzer should be respected when parsing the query. If this is set to false, then the StopFilterFactory in the query analyzer is ignored.* https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_3/the-extended-dismax-query-parser.html But seems like its not working. http://Box-1:8983/solr/SalesCentralDev_4/select?q=internet of things&rows=0&defType=edismax&qf=search_field content*&stopwords=false*&debug=true "parsedquery":"+(DisjunctionMaxQuery((content:internet | search_field:internet)) DisjunctionMaxQuery((content:thing | search_field:thing)))", * "parsedquery_toString":"+((content:internet | search_field:internet) (content:thing | search_field:thing))",* Are we missing something here? -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Spellcheck Collations Phrase based instead of AND
Hi,
For a sample collation during spellcheck.
"collation",{
"collationQuery":"smart connected factory",
"hits":109,
"misspellingsAndCorrections":[
"smart","smart",
"connected","connected",
"fator","factory"]},
"collation",{
"collationQuery":"smart connected faster",
"hits":325,
"misspellingsAndCorrections":[
"smart","smart",
"connected","connected",
"fator","faster"]},
"collation",{
"collationQuery":"sparc connected factory",
"hits":14,
"misspellingsAndCorrections":[
"smart","sparc",
"connected","connected",
"fator","factory"]},
The hits in the collationQuery are based on AND between the keyword .
Is it possible to get the collations sorted based on phrase instead of AND
Regards
Ashish
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
StopWords behavior with phrases
Hi, We make query to solr as below *q="market and cloud" OR (market and cloud)&q.op=AND&deftype=edismax* Our intent to look for results with both phrase match and AND query together where solr itself takes care of relevancy. But due to presence of stopword in phrase query a gap is left which gives different results as against a keyword "market cloud". "parsedquery_toString":"+(+(content:\"market ? cloud\" | search_field:\"market ? cloud\"))", There are suggestion that for phrase query create a separate field with no stopword,But then we'll not be able to achieve both phrase and AND in a single request. Is there anyway ? can be removed from phrase or any suggestion for our requirement. Please suggest Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Exception while adding data in multiple threads
Hi, I am getting below exception while adding data into solr. I am adding data concurrently in 20 threads, 100 documents in a batch per thread. Each documents contains 40 fields and all are indexed. This issue occurs only when I add in multi threads. Can you please help out here? Caused by: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException: Error from server at http://10.88.66.154:8983/solr: Invalid version (expected 2, but 95) or the data in not in 'javabin' format at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.executeMethod(HttpSolrClient.java:643) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:255) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:244) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:194) at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrClient.add(SolrClient.java:106) at org.springframework.data.solr.core.SolrTemplate.lambda$saveBeans$3(SolrTemplate.java:227) at org.springframework.data.solr.core.SolrTemplate$$Lambda$649/753427667.doInSolr(Unknown Source) at org.springframework.data.solr.core.SolrTemplate.execute(SolrTemplate.java:167) Regards Ashish Athavale | Architect ashish_athav...@persistent.com<mailto:ashish_athav...@persistent.com>| Cell: +91-9881137580| Tel: +91-02067034708 Persistent Systems Ltd. | www.persistent.com<http://www.persistent.com> DISCLAIMER == This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the property of Persistent Systems Ltd. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. Persistent Systems Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus infected mails.
Indexing a Multivalued field using ContentStreamUpdateRequest in Solr
Hello,
I use below code snippet to index data from a text file into solr. My text data
is a tsv file with 3 fields - id,title and types. The field "types" is a
multivalued field and these values are available as comma separated in the text
file itself.
Here is an example: 123 building house,skyscraper,hut
id is 123 title is building types is house,skyscraper,hut
How do I modify my code to store types as a multivalued field in Solr?
HttpSolrServer server = new HttpSolrServer("/my/solr/home");
ModifiableSolrParams solrparams = new ModifiableSolrParams(new
ModifiableSolrParams());
solrparams.set("fieldnames", "id,title,types");
ContentStreamUpdateRequest request = new
ContentStreamUpdateRequest("/update");
request.setParams(params);
ContentStream readFile = new ContentStreamBase.FileStream(new
File("myFile.txt"));
request.addContentStream(readFile);
SolrResponseBase response = null;
try {
response = (SolrResponseBase) request.process(server);
}catch(Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
}
Regards,
Ashish
CAUTION - Disclaimer *
This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely
for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are
not
to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other
person and
any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has
taken
every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any
damage
you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out
your
own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the
right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this
e-mail
address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the
Infosys e-mail system.
***INFOSYS End of Disclaimer INFOSYS***
Delete solr data from disk space
I am facing a problem in deleting solr data form disk space. I had 80Gb of of solr data. I deleted 30% of these data by using query in solr-php client and committed. Now deleted data is not visible from the solr UI but used disk space is still 80Gb for solr data. Please reply if you have any solution to free the disk space after deleting some solr data. Thanks in advance. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Delete-solr-data-from-disk-space-tp24808676p24808676.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Delete solr data from disk space
Sorry!! But this solution will not work because I deleted data by certain query. Then how can i know which files should be deleted. I cant delete whole data. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Delete-solr-data-from-disk-space-tp24808676p24808868.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Delete solr data from disk space
Hi , Sorry!! But this solution will not work because I deleted data by certain query. Then how can i know which files should be deleted. I cant delete whole data. Markus Jelsma - Buyways B.V. wrote: > > Hello, > > > A rigorous but quite effective method is manually deleting the files in > your SOLR_HOME/data directory and reindex the documents you want. This > will surely free some diskspace. > > > Cheers, > > - > Markus Jelsma Buyways B.V. Tel. 050-3118123 > Technisch ArchitectFriesestraatweg 215c Fax. 050-3118124 > http://www.buyways.nl 9743 AD GroningenKvK 01074105 > > > On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 06:26 -0700, Ashish Kumar Srivastava wrote: > >> I am facing a problem in deleting solr data form disk space. >> I had 80Gb of of solr data. I deleted 30% of these data by using query in >> solr-php client and committed. >> Now deleted data is not visible from the solr UI but used disk space is >> still 80Gb for solr data. >> Please reply if you have any solution to free the disk space after >> deleting >> some solr data. >> >> Thanks in advance. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Delete-solr-data-from-disk-space-tp24808676p24808883.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Delete solr data from disk space
Hi Toby, Thanks but i have tried this solution earlier but the problem with this solution is that it is taking too much disk space for optimization(more than two times of originally index data size) Do you have any better solution or any other option by which we can use optimize without using too much space. Thanks Ashish Toby Cole-2 wrote: > > Hi Anish, > Have you optimized your index? > When you delete documents in lucene they are simply marked as > 'deleted', they aren't physically removed from the disk. > To get the disk space back you must run an optimize, which re-writes > the index out to disk without the deleted documents, then deletes the > original. > > Toby > > On 4 Aug 2009, at 14:41, Ashish Kumar Srivastava wrote: > >> >> Hi , >> >> >> Sorry!! But this solution will not work because I deleted data by >> certain >> query. >> Then how can i know which files should be deleted. I cant delete >> whole data. >> >> >> >> Markus Jelsma - Buyways B.V. wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> >>> A rigorous but quite effective method is manually deleting the >>> files in >>> your SOLR_HOME/data directory and reindex the documents you want. >>> This >>> will surely free some diskspace. >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> - >>> Markus Jelsma Buyways B.V. Tel. >>> 050-3118123 >>> Technisch ArchitectFriesestraatweg 215c Fax. >>> 050-3118124 >>> http://www.buyways.nl 9743 AD GroningenKvK 01074105 >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 06:26 -0700, Ashish Kumar Srivastava wrote: >>> >>>> I am facing a problem in deleting solr data form disk space. >>>> I had 80Gb of of solr data. I deleted 30% of these data by using >>>> query in >>>> solr-php client and committed. >>>> Now deleted data is not visible from the solr UI but used disk >>>> space is >>>> still 80Gb for solr data. >>>> Please reply if you have any solution to free the disk space after >>>> deleting >>>> some solr data. >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance. >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Delete-solr-data-from-disk-space-tp24808676p24808883.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > -- > Toby Cole > Software Engineer, Semantico Limited > Registered in England and Wales no. 03841410, VAT no. GB-744614334. > Registered office Lees House, 21-23 Dyke Road, Brighton BN1 3FE, UK. > > Check out all our latest news and thinking on the Discovery blog > http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/ > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Delete-solr-data-from-disk-space-tp24808676p24821241.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Delete solr data from disk space
Hi Toby, Thanks for the reply, But i have tried this solution earlier but the problem with this solution is that it is taking too much disk space for optimization(more than two times of originally index data size) Do you have any better solution or any other option by which we can use optimize without using too much space. Thanks Ashish Toby Cole-2 wrote: > > Hi Anish, > Have you optimized your index? > When you delete documents in lucene they are simply marked as > 'deleted', they aren't physically removed from the disk. > To get the disk space back you must run an optimize, which re-writes > the index out to disk without the deleted documents, then deletes the > original. > > Toby > > On 4 Aug 2009, at 14:41, Ashish Kumar Srivastava wrote: > >> >> Hi , >> >> >> Sorry!! But this solution will not work because I deleted data by >> certain >> query. >> Then how can i know which files should be deleted. I cant delete >> whole data. >> >> >> >> Markus Jelsma - Buyways B.V. wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> >>> A rigorous but quite effective method is manually deleting the >>> files in >>> your SOLR_HOME/data directory and reindex the documents you want. >>> This >>> will surely free some diskspace. >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> - >>> Markus Jelsma Buyways B.V. Tel. >>> 050-3118123 >>> Technisch ArchitectFriesestraatweg 215c Fax. >>> 050-3118124 >>> http://www.buyways.nl 9743 AD GroningenKvK 01074105 >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 06:26 -0700, Ashish Kumar Srivastava wrote: >>> >>>> I am facing a problem in deleting solr data form disk space. >>>> I had 80Gb of of solr data. I deleted 30% of these data by using >>>> query in >>>> solr-php client and committed. >>>> Now deleted data is not visible from the solr UI but used disk >>>> space is >>>> still 80Gb for solr data. >>>> Please reply if you have any solution to free the disk space after >>>> deleting >>>> some solr data. >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance. >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Delete-solr-data-from-disk-space-tp24808676p24808883.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > -- > Toby Cole > Software Engineer, Semantico Limited > Registered in England and Wales no. 03841410, VAT no. GB-744614334. > Registered office Lees House, 21-23 Dyke Road, Brighton BN1 3FE, UK. > > Check out all our latest news and thinking on the Discovery blog > http://blogs.semantico.com/discovery-blog/ > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Delete-solr-data-from-disk-space-tp24808676p24821271.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
