Solr caches and document deletes
I asked this question on Friday evening (US timezone), but nobody's responded. Could be just that it's Easter weekend, but my question was a little convoluted, so I'll re-ask it in a simpler way. If all I'm doing in an index update is deleting documents, it seems that it should be possible to keep the existing caches around, and just remove references to deleted documents from them, rather than throwing them out the window and doing a rewarm. Is this something that has been brought up before, or had an issue filed in Jira? A slightly related question: If you make a commit with waitSearcher set to false, is there a way to then check the status of that commit and know when it's completely done? Another slightly related question: Is there any way, without changing the config file and restarting Solr or reloading the core, to completely turn autoCommit off for initial DIH import, then turn it back on for updates? The autoCommit seems to cause issues for my initial import, at least on the 1.5-dev that I'm using. Thinking back to when I was trying it with 1.4, the build then worked the same as it does now with maxTime and maxDocs both set to 0 - it creates only one .fdt file and multiples of all the other files. Without the explicit settings, it creates lots of .fdt files and doesn't delete all the old files when the final optimize is done. I haven't yet tried to look at the source to see if I can get the delete behavior I'm after on my own. I've never been a software developer and have very little experience with Java, so jumping into a large work like Solr is intimidating. I'm a system and network administrator, and Perl is my drug of choice when I write something, unless it's simple enough for shell scripting. I'm using Perl to write my Solr maintenance system right now, which is how I'm coming across issues to discuss here. I'm not using any Solr API in my scripts, just doing GET/POST on the URLs with LWP. If anyone has some pointers about where to start poking around in the source, I can take a look. I'm sure I can get past my unfamiliarity with Java's syntax pretty quickly, I just don't really have time to figure out the entire program flow on my own. Thanks, Shawn
an OR filter query
Is there anyway to use a filter query as an OR clause? For example I have product listings and I want to be able to filter out mature items by default. To do this I added: mature:false But then I can never return any mature items because appending fq=mature:true will obviously return 0 results because no item can both be mature and non-mature. I can get around this using defaults: mature:false But this is a little hacky because anytime I want to include mature items with non-mature items I need to explicitly set fq as a blank string. So is there any better way to do this? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/an-OR-filter-query-tp696579p696579.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: an OR filter query
Why not just make the your "mature:false" filter query a default value instead of always appended? I.e.: -snip- mature:false -snip- That way if someone wants mature items in their results the search client explicitly sets "fq=mature:*" or whatever. Would that work? On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Blargy wrote: > > Is there anyway to use a filter query as an OR clause? > > For example I have product listings and I want to be able to filter out > mature items by default. To do this I added: > > > mature:false > > > But then I can never return any mature items because appending > fq=mature:true will obviously return 0 results because no item can both be > mature and non-mature. > > I can get around this using defaults: > > > mature:false > > > But this is a little hacky because anytime I want to include mature items > with non-mature items I need to explicitly set fq as a blank string. > > So is there any better way to do this? Thanks > -- > View this message in context: > http://n3.nabble.com/an-OR-filter-query-tp696579p696579.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
What does it mean when you see a plus sign in between two words inside synonyms.txt?
Hi I'm new to this group, I would like to ask a question: What does it mean when you see a plus sign in between two words inside synonyms.txt? e.g. macbookair => macbook+air Thanks, Paulo -- View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/What-does-it-mean-when-you-see-a-plus-sign-in-between-two-words-inside-synonyms-txt-tp697235p697235.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
