Re: Debug Solr in Netbeans..
Yes Mark Miller, I changed the Connector specification in attach-debugger dialog, from SocketAttach TO socketListen. Now i got the netbeans debugger-console output as, Listening on 5005 But, nothing will be display after that, but the progress shows, attaching debugger What is the problem thanks and regards, Noor noor wrote: Addition to my previous reply:: I am running solr by start.jar file. It has my custom class jar file in its lib folder. Also in netbeans, custom class source has the checkpoint to debug.; and in the project folder, i created the build.properties. So i set the AttachDebugger settings; but it gives the connection refused error: I don't know, i am doing correctly Please anyone help me to solve this ... thanks and regards Noorulla noor wrote: Now, i put that build.properties file in the solr location tooo. But still i am getting. Attaching to localhost:5005 Connection refused Note: Solr lib folder contains, my custom class's jar file. But in netbeans, i am doing the attach-debugger processing. And in browser, i am accessing that class setting as, http://localhost:8983/solr/custom?q=searchText&debugQuery=true Browser page also gives Null error. Is this way correct. For your information, pls see about my custom handler settings on the following page: http://markmail.org/message/uvm5xp3ld5mmd5or?q=custom+solr+handler+error: Mark Miller wrote: If you don't see that, you may have build.properties in the wrong place. When you run 'solr-example' in debug mode, Listening for transport dt_socket at address: 5005 will be printed to STD out. Once you have that working correctly, you want to attach to port 5005, not 8983. Solr runs on 8983, but the debugger is listening on 5005. - Mark noor wrote: No. In netbeans, debugger-console output shows, Attaching to localhost:8983 handshake failed - connection prematurally closed i dont know where the problem is ? Mark Miller wrote: Do you see the following printed to std out when you start solr (using 'run-example')? Listening for transport dt_socket at address: 5005 noor wrote: Addition to the previous reply: I built my custom project and put into solr webapps lib folder. And starts running solr. In netbeans, i made the changes as i said before. But it shows connection refused error. anybody please give me the solution... noor wrote: Solr starts running in the port 8983, i created build.properties in the project folder, where the build.xml is. And in that empty build.properties file, i added, example.debug=true only. And in Netbeans, Debug -> Attach Debugger, - Debugger is JavaDebugger(JPDA); - Connector is SocketAttach(Attaches by socket to other VMs) - HOST is localhost; - Port as 5005; and Timeout is empty. During solr running, i set this, but in the output screen shows "Connection is refused." Is my changes are correct ??? or i need to change anything else... thanks and regards, Noor Mark Miller wrote: noor wrote: hi, i am new to apache solr. i got the solr source code, and i created my own (custom) classes. Also, i make the request reference to that newly created classes in solr-config.xml. now i need to debug my code, when the solr search calls my class.. So, for this, i dont know how to debug my code? Please anybody help me to achieve this. thanks and regards, Noor Make a file next to build.xml called build.properties. Add to the empty file: example.debug=true Run the ant target 'run-example' in build.xml. Solr will run with the ability to connect with a remote debugger on port 5005. In Netbeans, from the main menu, select Debug > Attach Debugger... (In NetBeans 6.1 and older select Run > Attach Debugger...). Follow the dialogue box prompts to connect to the running Solr example.
Re: Custom Request handler Error:
how to create a custom update handler, to update my fields... ?
Also, how to make the update, through url, i mean,
http://localhost:8983/solr/update/../ like that... ???
noor wrote:
Yes, i changed "custom" into "/custom", now it calls my class.
But, in browser, It shows
Null RequestHandler null.
So, i need to accept my changes by solr. For that, what i need to do,
pls guide me to acheive this.
Noble Paul wrote:
register is as follows
class="org.apache.solr.my.MyCustomHandler">
the request must be made to the uri "/custom" only then the requests
would come to your handler
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 5:49 PM, noor wrote:
Yes, i changed requestHandler name as,
class="org.apache.solr.my.MyCustomHandler">
.
Then also,
In statistics page, my custom handler under QueryHandler's request
count
remains 0. It shows that, the webrequest is not coming to my class
Noble Paul wrote:
register your handler in some other name and fire a request to that
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 8:07 PM, noor wrote:
I solved this NullPointerException, by the following changes.
In java code:
public void handleRequestBody(SolrQueryRequest request,
SolrQueryResponse
response) throws Exception {
SolrCore coreToRequest =
request.getCore();//coreContainer.getCore("core2");
.
}
and in solr-config.xml:
explicit
tandem
true
Now, my webapp runs fine by,
http://localhost:8983/mysearch
searching also working fine.
But, these are not run through my custom handler. So i felt, it
wrongly
doing searching.
Because, in solr admin statistics page,
my custom handler under QueryHandler's request count remains 0, it
doesn't
get incremented, when i search something. Rather,
statndardReqHandler's
request count is incremented.
And another thing, how do we debug solr. ???
Please anybody help me to solve this ...
Thanks in advance.
Noble Paul ??? ?? wrote:
is there any error on the console?
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Noor
wrote:
hi,
i am new to apache solr.
I need to create a custom request handler class. So i create a
new one
and
changed the solr-config.xml file as,
explicit
tandem
true
And in my java class, the code is,
public class MyCustomHandler extends RequestHandlerBase{
public CoreContainer coreContainer;
public void handleRequestBody(SolrQueryRequest request,
SolrQueryResponse
response) throws Exception {
SolrCore coreToRequest = coreContainer.getCore("core2");
ModifiableSolrParams params = new ModifiableSolrParams();
params.set("echoParams", "explicit");
params.set("q", "text");
params.set("debugQuery", "true");
request = new LocalSolrQueryRequest(coreToRequest, params);
// SolrRequestHandler reqHandler =
coreToRequest.getRequestHandler("/select");
coreToRequest.execute(reqHandler, request, response);
coreToRequest.close();
request.close();
}
// the abstract methods - getDescription(), getSourceId(),
getSource(),
getVersion() are //overrided... but these methods doesn't have any
implementations.
}
But, if i search any text in my webapp from browser, gots the
HTTP 500
error.
i dont know how SolrContainer is intialized
Pls anyone give me the solution...
thanks and regards,
Mohamed
Re: fq vs. q
>Fergus McMenemie schrieb:
>
>> The article could explain the difference between fq= and
>> facet.query= and when you should use one in preference to
>> the other.
>
>My understanding is that while these query modifiers rely on the
>same implementation (cached filters) to boost performance, they
>simply and obviously differ in that "fq" limits the result set to
>your filter criterion whereas "facet.query" does not restrict the
>result but instead enhances it with statistical information gained
>from applying set intersection of result and facet query filters.
>
>It looks like "facet.query" is just a more flexible means of
>defining a filter than possible using a mere "facet.field".
>
>Would that be approximately correct?
Yes. While q= and fq= affect the "results" portion of a search
response. The facet.query only affects the "facets" portion of a
response. facet.query(s) are only used where you want a facet
summary of your query based on some kind of complex expression
rather than the terms within a single field.
I added the comment in that I think that a wiki page discussing
fs vs q should also mention facet.query.
>It appears to me that each "facet.query" invariably leads to one
>boolean filter, so if you wanted to do range faceting for a given
>field and obtain, say, results reduced from their actual continuum
>of values to three ranges {A,B,C}, you'd have to define three
>"facet.query" parameters accordingly. A mere "facet.field", on the
>other hand, creates as many filters as there are unique values in
>the field. Is that correct?
Yes, A single facet.query on its own is probably useless. You would
need many of them. And as they have to be re-calculated after each
query I would imagine they are expensive. Also, given that facets
are used to help drive GUI options which turn drive the contents of
subsequent fq= filters, I am wondering fq= queries are not
analyzed before the search is made but I get the impression that
facet.querys are! This could be a big pitfall.
>Michael Ludwig
Fergus.
--
===
Fergus McMenemie Email:fer...@twig.me.uk
Techmore Ltd Phone:(UK) 07721 376021
Unix/Mac/Intranets Analyst Programmer
===
How to allow case insensitive in Solr
Hi everyone,How can I allow Solr to search for all cases like upper case or lower case in Solr? Best regards, Leakhina
Re: How to allow case insensitive in Solr
hi, You can create a field with class="Solr.TextField" which needs a LowerCaseFilterFactory in the index and query analyzers e.g. This will allow for case insensitive searches. regards, - Markus Jelsma Buyways B.V. Tel. 050-3118123 Technisch ArchitectFriesestraatweg 215c Fax. 050-3118124 http://www.buyways.nl 9743 AD GroningenKvK 01074105 On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 15:18 +0700, chem leakhina wrote: > Hi everyone,How can I allow Solr to search for all cases like upper case or > lower case in Solr? > Best regards, > Leakhina
Re: How to allow case insensitive in Solr
So when I use LowerCaseFilterFactory, I can search with upper case and lower case right? On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Markus Jelsma - Buyways B.V. < mar...@buyways.nl> wrote: > hi, > > > You can create a field with class="Solr.TextField" which needs a > LowerCaseFilterFactory in the index and query analyzers e.g. > > > > class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/> > class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> > > > > class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/> > class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> > > > > This will allow for case insensitive searches. > > regards, > > - > Markus Jelsma Buyways B.V. Tel. 050-3118123 > Technisch ArchitectFriesestraatweg 215c Fax. 050-3118124 > http://www.buyways.nl 9743 AD GroningenKvK 01074105 > > > On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 15:18 +0700, chem leakhina wrote: > > > Hi everyone,How can I allow Solr to search for all cases like upper case > or > > lower case in Solr? > > Best regards, > > Leakhina >
Re: How to allow case insensitive in Solr
Indeed, as it will LowerCase all tokens during indextime and querytime so the term LowerCaseFilterFactory will (aside from some tokenizer) enter the index as lowercasefilterfactory. Then, any searchterm will also be lowercased so the searchterm LOWERCASEFILTERFACTORY will match because on querytime it will also pass through the filter. - Markus Jelsma Buyways B.V. Tel. 050-3118123 Technisch ArchitectFriesestraatweg 215c Fax. 050-3118124 http://www.buyways.nl 9743 AD GroningenKvK 01074105 On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 15:46 +0700, chem leakhina wrote: > So when I use LowerCaseFilterFactory, I can search with upper case and > lower > case right?
Re: Custom Request handler Error:
please take a look at one of the updatehandlers which are already there
XmlUpdateRequestHandler
CSVRequestHandler
BinaryUpdateRequestHandler
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:34 PM, noor wrote:
> how to create a custom update handler, to update my fields... ?
> Also, how to make the update, through url, i mean,
>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/update/../ like that... ???
>
>
>
>
> noor wrote:
>>
>> Yes, i changed "custom" into "/custom", now it calls my class.
>> But, in browser, It shows
>> Null RequestHandler null.
>>
>> So, i need to accept my changes by solr. For that, what i need to do,
>> pls guide me to acheive this.
>>
>>
>> Noble Paul wrote:
>>>
>>> register is as follows
>>> >> class="org.apache.solr.my.MyCustomHandler">
>>>
>>> the request must be made to the uri "/custom" only then the requests
>>> would come to your handler
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 5:49 PM, noor wrote:
>>>
Yes, i changed requestHandler name as,
>>> class="org.apache.solr.my.MyCustomHandler">
.
Then also,
In statistics page, my custom handler under QueryHandler's request count
remains 0. It shows that, the webrequest is not coming to my class
Noble Paul wrote:
>
> register your handler in some other name and fire a request to that
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 8:07 PM, noor wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I solved this NullPointerException, by the following changes.
>>
>> In java code:
>> public void handleRequestBody(SolrQueryRequest request,
>> SolrQueryResponse
>> response) throws Exception {
>> SolrCore coreToRequest =
>> request.getCore();//coreContainer.getCore("core2");
>> .
>> }
>>
>> and in solr-config.xml:
>>
>>
>> explicit
>> tandem
>> true
>>
>>
>>
>> Now, my webapp runs fine by,
>> http://localhost:8983/mysearch
>> searching also working fine.
>> But, these are not run through my custom handler. So i felt, it
>> wrongly
>> doing searching.
>> Because, in solr admin statistics page,
>> my custom handler under QueryHandler's request count remains 0, it
>> doesn't
>> get incremented, when i search something. Rather,
>> statndardReqHandler's
>> request count is incremented.
>>
>> And another thing, how do we debug solr. ???
>> Please anybody help me to solve this ...
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Noble Paul ??? ?? wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> is there any error on the console?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Noor
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
hi,
i am new to apache solr.
I need to create a custom request handler class. So i create a new
one
and
changed the solr-config.xml file as,
explicit
tandem
true
And in my java class, the code is,
public class MyCustomHandler extends RequestHandlerBase{
public CoreContainer coreContainer;
public void handleRequestBody(SolrQueryRequest request,
SolrQueryResponse
response) throws Exception {
SolrCore coreToRequest = coreContainer.getCore("core2");
ModifiableSolrParams params = new ModifiableSolrParams();
params.set("echoParams", "explicit");
params.set("q", "text");
params.set("debugQuery", "true");
request = new LocalSolrQueryRequest(coreToRequest, params);
// SolrRequestHandler reqHandler =
coreToRequest.getRequestHandler("/select");
coreToRequest.execute(reqHandler, request, response);
coreToRequest.close();
request.close();
}
// the abstract methods - getDescription(), getSourceId(),
getSource(),
getVersion() are //overrided... but these methods doesn't have any
implementations.
}
But, if i search any text in my webapp from browser, gots the HTTP
500
error.
i dont know how SolrContainer is intialized
Pls anyone give me the solution...
thanks and regards,
Mohamed
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
-
Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com
Re: Count of facet count
Hi,
Some questions about an integer with numFacetFound for facets in solr:
Our application "tecfinder" has a faceted browsing with paging for each
facet
(see "Fachgebiete" in
http://tecfinder.fiz-technik.de/tecfinder/faces/facelets/search/search.jsp?query=Laser
).
Currently I am integrating solr in "tecfinder". So I need the number of
terms that have a non zero count.
e.g. if I search with
facet=true&facet.field=LG&f.LG.facet.limit=4
we need something like numFacetFound=19 for field LG (see example below).
To program an addition for SimpleFacets should be easy,
because I only have to change three methods:
- getFacetTermEnumCounts (with respect to the line "if (--lim<0) break;")
- getFieldCacheCounts (count non zero values of "int[] counts")
- UnInvertedField.getCounts (again "int[] counts")
It will not be easy to change DistribFieldFacet, but I hope this can wait
("This API is experimental and subject to change").
So my questions:
Is there already an "numFacetFound" addition programed for solr?
Did I miss something? Is there more to change then this three methods?
What is an accurate place to expand the response with "numFacetFound"?
(Should I derive a subclass "SubList" or "OffsetList" of NamedList with an
attribute "totalAmount").
Any advice is welcome
Karsten
p.s. the example for
facet=true&facet.field=LG&f.LG.facet.limit=4
19
592
191
82
32
hossman wrote:
>
>
> : > : how I can get count of distinct facet_fields ?
> : > :
> : > : like numFacetFound in this example:
> : >
> : > There's currently no way to do that.
>
> : I need to do the same thing. Any pointers on how one would go about
> : implementing that? (in Java) Thanks.
>
> The change would be in the SimpleFacets class, and there are a couple of
> differnet code paths to worry about (because two different hueristics are
> used depending on the field type) but the first step would be to define
> what the count represents: is it just the number of terms being returned?
> the number of terms that have a non zero count? or all of the terms in the
> field?
>
> the first and the last are pretty trivial, the middle one requires
> maintaining a new count as the terms are scanned (and if i'm not mistaken,
> there's an optimization in there to stop once we know we won't find any
> terms better then theones we already have, and in order to return that
> count you'd need to prevent that optimization)
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Count-of-facet-count-tp16678811p24052214.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Few Queries regarding indexes in Solr
Hello, Answers inlined. - Original Message > 1. Is it possible to query from another index folder (say index1) in > solr? You don't really query *from* an index, so I'm not sure what exactly you mean. However, you can query Solr remotely, if that's what you mean, for example using SolrJ if your application is written in Java. > 2. Is it possible to query 2 indexes(folders index1 and index2) stored > in the same machine using the same port on a single solr instance? Yes, please look for "DistributedSearch" on the Wiki. > 3. consider a case: >i have indexes in 2 shards, and i merge the indexes (present in 2 > shards) onto the 3rd shard >now i add more documents into shard1 and delete some documents > from shard 2 and update the indexes. >is it possible to send the differences only into shard 3 and then > merge it at shard 3? If I understood you correctly, then no, sending only the newly added/deleted documents in 2 indices to the 3rd index after the fact is not doable. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
Integration of Solr with Terracotta
Hi, I am looking for some way to integrate Solr with Terracotta. There is already an issue logged in Solr JIRA: http://jira.terracotta.org/jira/browse/CDV-399 But it is logged almost 2 years back. Is the integration with Terracotta possible in the latest release (1.3.0)? Thanks - Bhushan DISCLAIMER == This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the property of Persistent Systems Ltd. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. Persistent Systems Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus infected mails.
Re: Problem with Query Parser?
Can someone explain this? +myField:"\*" +city:Mumbai gives me all results for +city:Mumbai myField is a regular text field and "*" is not a stopword. Cheers Avlesh On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Avlesh Singh wrote: > >> > >> Probably the analyzer removed the "$", leaving an empty term and causing > >> the clause to be removed altogether. > >> > > > > I predicted this behavior while writing the mail yesterday, Yonik. > > Does it sound logical and intuitive? > > It's intuitive in some circumstances, and not in others. It's > certainly not intuitive in this particular case. I think there's > another JIRA issue already open for this somewhere. > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com >
Re: Few Queries regarding indexes in Solr
Rakhi Khatwani schrieb: 1. Is it possible to query from another index folder (say index1) in solr? I think you're looking for the multi-core feature. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultipleIndexes http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin 2. Is it possible to query 2 indexes(folders index1 and index2) stored in the same machine using the same port on a single solr instance? Sounds like multi-core. 3. consider a case: i have indexes in 2 shards, and i merge the indexes (present in 2 shards) onto the 3rd shard now i add more documents into shard1 and delete some documents from shard 2 and update the indexes. is it possible to send the differences only into shard 3 and then merge it at shard 3? My (very limited) understanding of shards is that you repartition your documents among shards and send each document to only one shard. (Not sure this is correct.) Michael Ludwig
Re: Integration of Solr with Terracotta
Solr (1.4) now has a DirectoryFactory, so it would be much easier to try this out. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:29 AM, bhushan_mahale wrote: > Hi, > > I am looking for some way to integrate Solr with Terracotta. > > There is already an issue logged in Solr JIRA: > http://jira.terracotta.org/jira/browse/CDV-399 > > But it is logged almost 2 years back. > > Is the integration with Terracotta possible in the latest release (1.3.0)? > > Thanks > - Bhushan > > DISCLAIMER > == > This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the > property of Persistent Systems Ltd. It is intended only for the use of the > individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended > recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, distribute or > use this message. If you have received this communication in error, please > notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. Persistent Systems > Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus infected mails. >
Re: Problem with Query Parser?
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Avlesh Singh wrote: > Can someone explain this? > +myField:"\*" +city:Mumbai gives me all results for +city:Mumbai > > myField is a regular text field and "*" is not a stopword. * and other non alphanumerics are probably being dropped by WordDelimiterFilter. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: Problem with Query Parser?
Thanks Yonik! Cheers Avlesh On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Avlesh Singh wrote: > > Can someone explain this? > > +myField:"\*" +city:Mumbai gives me all results for +city:Mumbai > > > > myField is a regular text field and "*" is not a stopword. > > * and other non alphanumerics are probably being dropped by > WordDelimiterFilter. > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com >
RE: Integration of Solr with Terracotta
Hey Yonik, Thanks for the reply. Can I use something like Compass for the integration? (http://www.terracotta.org/web/display/orgsite/Lucene+Integration) The idea is to change Solr code at the places where it uses lucene.store.directory. Use the TerracottaDirectory (provided by Compass) instead. Do you suggest that there is some additional directory defined in Solr 1.4 DirectoryFactory for the smooth integration with Terracotta? Can you elaborate more on the required steps? BTW When is the Solr 1.4 expected to release? Thanks a ton, - Bhushan -Original Message- From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 7:06 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Integration of Solr with Terracotta Solr (1.4) now has a DirectoryFactory, so it would be much easier to try this out. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:29 AM, bhushan_mahale wrote: > Hi, > > I am looking for some way to integrate Solr with Terracotta. > > There is already an issue logged in Solr JIRA: > http://jira.terracotta.org/jira/browse/CDV-399 > > But it is logged almost 2 years back. > > Is the integration with Terracotta possible in the latest release (1.3.0)? > > Thanks > - Bhushan > > DISCLAIMER > == > This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the > property of Persistent Systems Ltd. It is intended only for the use of the > individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended > recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, distribute or > use this message. If you have received this communication in error, please > notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. Persistent Systems > Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus infected mails. > DISCLAIMER == This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the property of Persistent Systems Ltd. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. Persistent Systems Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus infected mails.
Re: Integration of Solr with Terracotta
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:17 AM, bhushan_mahale wrote: > The idea is to change Solr code at the places where it uses > lucene.store.directory. > Use the TerracottaDirectory (provided by Compass) instead. I thought Teracotta could work directly on RAMDirectory somehow... but trying out the implementation from Compass seems reasonable. I don't know much about Teracotta - but I've been skeptical in the past that it can automatically provide good replication at scale. I'd love to be proven wrong though! > Do you suggest that there is some additional directory defined in Solr 1.4 > DirectoryFactory for the smooth integration with Terracotta? > Can you elaborate more on the required steps? > > BTW When is the Solr 1.4 expected to release? It was supposed to have been about now - but now Lucene 2.9 looks like it's wrapping things up too, and this particular Lucene release has had so many changes, it may be wise to wait until we can use a non-trunk version. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
Query parameter encode issue
Hello list, I am having the following query, q=+text:test +site_id:(4 ) +publishDate:[2008-05-01T00\:00\:00Z TO 2009-06-30T00\:00\:00Z] If I try this query in the browser directly , it is working fine and the url is encoded automatically in the browser when I enter as follows http://localhost:8983/solr/TeamSite/select?q=+text:test%20+site_id:(4%20)%20 +publishDate:[2008-05-01T00\:00\:00Z%20TO%202009-06-30T00\:00\:00Z] In my developed solr client, I am using the following code to encode, qryString = "+text:test +site_id:(4 ) +publishDate:[2008-05-01T00\:00\:00Z TO 2009-06-30T00\:00\:00Z]"; URLEncoder.encode(qryString, "UTF-8"); and the encoded url is like this, http://localhost:8983/solr/TeamSite/select?q=%2Btext%3Atest+%2Bsite_id%3A%28 4+%29+%2BpublishDate%3A%5B2008-05-01T00%5C%3A00%5C%3A00Z+TO+2009-06-30T00%5C %3A00%5C%3A00Z%5D I am just encoding the parameter value ( +text:test +site_id:(4 ) +publishDate:[2008-05-01T00\:00\:00Z TO 2009-06-30T00\:00\:00Z] ) and not parameter name ( q=). Can anyone please tell me what mistake I have done here?
Searching across multivalued fields
I'm trying to prevent a search from going across multiple values in a multivalued field and am running into an issue. From what I've read, the standard way to do this is with a positionIncrementGap that is larger than the ps value. However, I can't make this a phrase query because there is another field that has to be searched against. To be more specific, I'm indexing a collection of music albums that have multiple tracks and an album artist. So, some searches will contain both the artist name and the track name. I can't make this a single phrase query as it is indexed across two separate fields. So a small ps with a large posIncGap doesn't do anything. Is there any way to get past this? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Searching-across-multivalued-fields-tp24056297p24056297.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
moreLikeThis fl
I'd like to have a MLT query return similar docs, but the fl for those mlt docs should be different from the main fl. For example, the main fl is "*, score" -- but I only want the title and id in my MLT results. Is this possible? Matt
Re: Query parameter encode issue
>
> qryString = "+text:test +site_id:(4 ) +publishDate:[2008-05-01T00\:00\:00Z
> TO 2009-06-30T00\:00\:00Z]";
> URLEncoder.encode(qryString, "UTF-8");
>
You don't have to encode the complete query string parameter. You just need
encode the values for individual query paramters.
So it should be more like qryString = "+text:" + URLEncoder.encode("test",
"UTF-8") ... and so on.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Radha C. wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I am having the following query,
> q=+text:test +site_id:(4 ) +publishDate:[2008-05-01T00\:00\:00Z TO
> 2009-06-30T00\:00\:00Z]
>
> If I try this query in the browser directly , it is working fine and the
> url
> is encoded automatically in the browser when I enter as follows
>
>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/TeamSite/select?q=+text:test%20+site_id:(4%20)%20
> +publishDate:[2008-05-01T00
> \:00\:00Z%20TO%202009-06-30T00\:00\:00Z]
>
> In my developed solr client, I am using the following code to encode,
>
> qryString = "+text:test +site_id:(4 ) +publishDate:[2008-05-01T00\:00\:00Z
> TO 2009-06-30T00\:00\:00Z]";
> URLEncoder.encode(qryString, "UTF-8");
>
> and the encoded url is like this,
>
>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/TeamSite/select?q=%2Btext%3Atest+%2Bsite_id%3A%28
>
> 4+%29+%2BpublishDate%3A%5B2008-05-01T00%5C%3A00%5C%3A00Z+TO+2009-06-30T00%5C
> %3A00%5C%3A00Z%5D
>
> I am just encoding the parameter value ( +text:test +site_id:(4 )
> +publishDate:[2008-05-01T00\:00\:00Z TO 2009-06-30T00\:00\:00Z] ) and not
> parameter name ( q=).
>
> Can anyone please tell me what mistake I have done here?
>
>
Range queries
Hi,
When doing range queries it seems the query is either x:[5 TO 8] which
means 5 <= x <= 8 or x:{5 TO 8} which means 5 < x < 8. But how do you
get one half exclusive, the other inclusive for double fields the
following: 5 <= x < 8? Is this possible?
Regards,
gwk
RE: Query parameter encode issue
Thanks for your reply..
If that is the case, I need to do as follows,
"+text:" + URLEncoder.encode("test", "UTF-8") +URLEncoder.encode(" ",
"UTF-8")+"+site_id"+URLEncoder.encode(xx, "UTF-8")
Do I need to encode the space between two search field also? It is difficult
for me to do like this because I am having many search fields and forming
the query string dynamically.
Is there any other way I can do this? or else I will follow this then.
_
From: Avlesh Singh [mailto:avl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 8:38 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; cra...@ceiindia.com
Subject: Re: Query parameter encode issue
qryString = "+text:test +site_id:(4 ) +publishDate:[2008-05-01T00\:00\:00Z
TO 2009-06-30T00\:00\:00Z]";
URLEncoder.encode(qryString, "UTF-8");
You don't have to encode the complete query string parameter. You just need
encode the values for individual query paramters.
So it should be more like qryString = "+text:" + URLEncoder.encode("test",
"UTF-8") ... and so on.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Radha C. wrote:
Hello list,
I am having the following query,
q=+text:test +site_id:(4 ) +publishDate:[2008-05-01T00\:00\:00Z TO
2009-06-30T00\:00\:00Z]
If I try this query in the browser directly , it is working fine and the url
is encoded automatically in the browser when I enter as follows
http://localhost:8983/solr/TeamSite/select?q=+text:test%20+site_id:(4%20)%20
+publishDate:[2008-05-01T00\:00\:00Z%20TO%202009-06-30T00\:00\:00Z]
In my developed solr client, I am using the following code to encode,
qryString = "+text:test +site_id:(4 ) +publishDate:[2008-05-01T00\:00\:00Z
TO 2009-06-30T00\:00\:00Z]";
URLEncoder.encode(qryString, "UTF-8");
and the encoded url is like this,
http://localhost:8983/solr/TeamSite/select?q=%2Btext%3Atest+%2Bsite_id%3A%28
4+%29+%2BpublishDate%3A%5B2008-05-01T00%5C%3A00%5C%3A00Z+TO+2009-06-30T00%5C
%3A00%5C%3A00Z%5D
I am just encoding the parameter value ( +text:test +site_id:(4 )
+publishDate:[2008-05-01T00\:00\:00Z TO 2009-06-30T00\:00\:00Z] ) and not
parameter name ( q=).
Can anyone please tell me what mistake I have done here?
MoreLikeThis and TermVectors
Hey there, As I understood documentation, to have TermVectors will help to MoreLikeThis in performance side but the similitude of the results will be the same. Am I correct? Thanks in advance -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/MoreLikeThis-and-TermVectors-tp24057914p24057914.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Uncommitted documents coutn with autocommit enabled?
Hi all, is there a way to find out how many documents are "pending" when having autocommit enabled? best Ingo -- Ingo Renner TYPO3 Core Developer, Release Manager TYPO3 4.2
Re: MoreLikeThis and TermVectors
They should be, assuming the Analysis process creates the same tokens with the same frequency as was created when the Term Vectors were created. On Jun 16, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Marc Sturlese wrote: Hey there, As I understood documentation, to have TermVectors will help to MoreLikeThis in performance side but the similitude of the results will be the same. Am I correct? Thanks in advance -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/MoreLikeThis-and-TermVectors-tp24057914p24057914.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Grant Ingersoll http://www.lucidimagination.com/ Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika/Droids) using Solr/Lucene: http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
Re: Joins or subselects in solr
Thanks for the advice. Glad you like the site! Yes, we are using the new multi-select support to do this. At first, we wrote our own client- side solution to allow for multi-select which was super complex but moved to the built-in solr support as soon as we found it. Excellent feature! -Nasseam Solr-powered Ajax search+nav: http://factbook.bodukai.com/ Powered by Boutique: http://bodukai.com/boutique/ On Jun 14, 2009, at 8:16 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Nasseam Elkarra wrote: I am storing items in an index. Each item has a comma separated list of related items. Is it possible to bring back an item and all of its related items in one query? If so how and how would you distinguish between which one is the main item and which are the related. You would currently need a custom query component to do this... not sure if it's worth it vs two requests. Solr-powered Ajax search+nav: http://factbook.bodukai.com/ Cool, nice multi-select! Are you using Solr's new multi-select support to do this? -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: Range queries
Hi,
I think the square brackets/curly braces need to be balanced, so this is
currently not doable with existing query parsers.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: gwk
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 11:52:12 AM
> Subject: Range queries
>
> Hi,
>
> When doing range queries it seems the query is either x:[5 TO 8] which means
> 5
> <= x <= 8 or x:{5 TO 8} which means 5 < x < 8. But how do you get one half
> exclusive, the other inclusive for double fields the following: 5 <= x < 8?
> Is
> this possible?
>
> Regards,
>
> gwk
Re: Uncommitted documents coutn with autocommit enabled?
Ingo, I believe that's still visible on the Statistics page of the Solr Admin UI. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: Ingo Renner > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 12:33:05 PM > Subject: Uncommitted documents coutn with autocommit enabled? > > Hi all, > > is there a way to find out how many documents are "pending" when having > autocommit enabled? > > > best > Ingo > > --Ingo Renner > TYPO3 Core Developer, Release Manager TYPO3 4.2
Re: moreLikeThis fl
Matt, Maybe I'm missing something, but can't you use mlt.fl in the URL? Please see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MoreLikeThis#head-6460069f297626f2a982f1e22ec5d1519c456b2c Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: Matt Mitchell > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 11:08:00 AM > Subject: moreLikeThis fl > > I'd like to have a MLT query return similar docs, but the fl for those mlt > docs should be different from the main fl. For example, the main fl is "*, > score" -- but I only want the title and id in my MLT results. Is this > possible? > > Matt
Re: Replication problems on 1.4
Phil Hagelberg writes: > Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् writes: > >> if you removed the files while the slave is running , then the slave >> will not know that you removed the files (assuming it is a *nix box) >> and it will serve the search requests. But if you restart the slave , >> it should have automatically picked up the current index. >> >> if it doesn't it is a bug > > I did restart the slave server in my case. If I can confirm this with > the latest build from trunk, I will submit an issue. Hmm... can't reproduce with a fresh checkout and recreating my indices from that. Maybe it was something specifically misconfigured in my last setup. -Phil
Re: Query Filter fq with OR operator
This feature is very important to me .. should I post something on the dev forum? Not sure what the proper protocol is for adding a feature to the roadmap Thanks, Brian. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Query-Filter-fq-with-OR-operator-tp23895837p24059181.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Few Queries regarding indexes in Solr
Regarding that 3rd answer below: Yes, that's what most people do, though nothing prevents the indexing client from sending the same doc to multiple shards. In some scenarios that's exactly what you want to do. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: Michael Ludwig > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 8:36:25 AM > Subject: Re: Few Queries regarding indexes in Solr > > Rakhi Khatwani schrieb: > > > 1. Is it possible to query from another index folder (say > > index1) in solr? > > I think you're looking for the multi-core feature. > > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultipleIndexes > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin > > > 2. Is it possible to query 2 indexes(folders index1 and index2) > > stored in the same machine using the same port on a single solr > > instance? > > Sounds like multi-core. > > > 3. consider a case: i have indexes in 2 shards, and i merge the > > indexes (present in 2 shards) onto the 3rd shard now i add more > > documents into shard1 and delete some documents from shard 2 and > > update the indexes. is it possible to send the differences only > > into shard 3 and then merge it at shard 3? > > My (very limited) understanding of shards is that you repartition > your documents among shards and send each document to only one > shard. (Not sure this is correct.) > > Michael Ludwig
Luke / get doc count for each term
Hi-
I'm trying to use the LukeRequestHandler with an index of ~9 million
docs. I know that counting the top / distinct terms for each field is
expensive and can take a LONG time to return.
Is there a faster way to check the number of documents for each field?
Currently this gets the doc count for each term:
if( sfield != null && sfield.indexed() ) {
Query q = qp.parse( fieldName+":[* TO *]" );
int docCount = searcher.numDocs( q, matchAllDocs );
...
Looking at it again, that could be replaced with:
if( sfield != null && sfield.indexed() ) {
Query q = qp.parse( fieldName+":[* TO *]" );
int docCount = searcher.getDocSet( q ).size();
...
Is there any faster option then running a query for each field?
thanks
ryan
Re: Query Filter fq with OR operator
Brian, Opening a JIRA issue if it doesn't already exist is the best way. If you can provide a patch, even better! Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: brian519 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 1:32:41 PM > Subject: Re: Query Filter fq with OR operator > > > This feature is very important to me .. should I post something on the dev > forum? Not sure what the proper protocol is for adding a feature to the > roadmap > > Thanks, > Brian. > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Query-Filter-fq-with-OR-operator-tp23895837p24059181.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Query Filter fq with OR operator
Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > > Brian, > > Opening a JIRA issue if it doesn't already exist is the best way. If you > can provide a patch, even better! > > Otis > -- > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > Thanks Otis! I've created a JIRA > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1223 issue here > > - Original Message >> From: brian519 >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 1:32:41 PM >> Subject: Re: Query Filter fq with OR operator >> >> >> This feature is very important to me .. should I post something on the >> dev >> forum? Not sure what the proper protocol is for adding a feature to the >> roadmap >> >> Thanks, >> Brian. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Query-Filter-fq-with-OR-operator-tp23895837p24059181.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Query-Filter-fq-with-OR-operator-tp23895837p24060300.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Problem getting Solr statistics
Hi all,
I am stumped trying to get statistics from the Solr server. It seems
that every time I get the correct SolrInfoMBean, when I look up the proper
value (by name) in the NamedList, I get the exact same number back each
time. For example, upon start-up the server reports that "2" queries have
been performed, and any time I pull the value out of the MBean after that it
says "2" even though the stats.jsp reports an increasing number of queries
over time. What am I doing wrong?
Here is my sample code:
public class SolrUtil {
protected static final CoreContainer coreContainer;
protected static final String DEFAULT_CORE_NAME = "";
static {
CoreContainer.Initializer initializer = new CoreContainer.Initializer();
try {
coreContainer = initializer.initialize();
}
catch (Exception e) {
throw new ExceptionInInitializerError("Can't initialize core
container: " + e.getMessage());
}
initialize();
}
private static SolrCore getCore() {
return getCore(DEFAULT_CORE_NAME);
}
private static SolrCore getCore(String name) {
try {
return coreContainer.getCore(name);
}
catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
return null;
}
public static String getSolrInfoMBeanValue(SolrInfoMBean.Category
category, String entryName, String statName) {
Map registry = getCore().getInfoRegistry();
for (Map.Entry entry : registry.entrySet()) {
String key = entry.getKey();
SolrInfoMBean solrInfoMBean = entry.getValue();
if ((solrInfoMBean.getCategory() != category) ||
(!entryName.equals(key.trim( {
continue;
}
NamedList nl = solrInfoMBean.getStatistics();
if ((nl != null) && (nl.size() > 0)) {
for (int i = 0; i < nl.size(); i++) {
if (nl.getName(i).equals(statName)) {
return nl.getVal(i).toString();
}
}
}
}
return null;
}
[...I have other methods, that also get the value as a long, etc]
}
This code is modeled after the SolrDispatchFilter.java, _info.jsp and
stats.jsp.
I'd appreciate any help. (And yes, my core is named "".)
Sincerely,
Daryl.
Using Lucene Filter with SolrIndexSearcher
Hi all, Any ideas on how to use custom Lucene Filter (lucene.search.Filter) in conjuction with SolrIndexSearcher ? The case is writing custom Filter performing arbitrary records selection and AND-ing it to the existing filters passed in the query. However, the ResponseBuilder filters are Query objects, and there is no visible means of mixing those with Filter's in the standard QueryCommand object. (There is a search(Query query, Filter filter, Sort sort) method that allow passing of Filter but no way of mixing it with existing query. Also, using this means immediate loss of all caching benefits etc.). Any other idea on how to pass a custom filter applying arbitrary user- defined logic (for example "random drop of 30% records from result set"), to standard query would be useful as well. Thanks, .Alek
Re: Using Lucene Filter with SolrIndexSearcher
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Aleksandar Bradic wrote: > Any ideas on how to use custom Lucene Filter (lucene.search.Filter) in > conjuction with SolrIndexSearcher ? You can wrap the original query with a FilteredQuery class, or create a DocSet from the Filter via SolrIndexSearcher.convertFilter() -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com > The case is writing custom Filter performing arbitrary records selection and > AND-ing it to the existing filters passed in the query. > > However, the ResponseBuilder filters are Query objects, and there is no > visible means of mixing those with Filter's in the standard QueryCommand > object. > > (There is a search(Query query, Filter filter, Sort sort) method that allow > passing of Filter but no way of mixing it with existing query. Also, using > this means immediate loss of all caching benefits etc.). > > Any other idea on how to pass a custom filter applying arbitrary > user-defined logic (for example "random drop of 30% records from result > set"), to standard query would be useful as well. > > Thanks, > .Alek >
Re: Range queries
How about this: x:[5 TO 8] AND x:{0 TO 8}
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think the square brackets/curly braces need to be balanced, so this is
> currently not doable with existing query parsers.
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: gwk
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 11:52:12 AM
> > Subject: Range queries
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > When doing range queries it seems the query is either x:[5 TO 8] which
> means 5
> > <= x <= 8 or x:{5 TO 8} which means 5 < x < 8. But how do you get one
> half
> > exclusive, the other inclusive for double fields the following: 5 <= x <
> 8? Is
> > this possible?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > gwk
>
>
Re: Luke / get doc count for each term
doc count for each term is stored directly in the index - with the big
caveat that it doesn't take deleted docs into account. That addresses
the "get doc count for each term".
"get doc count for each field" is a different question... see below.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
> Hi-
>
> I'm trying to use the LukeRequestHandler with an index of ~9 million
> docs. I know that counting the top / distinct terms for each field is
> expensive and can take a LONG time to return.
>
> Is there a faster way to check the number of documents for each field?
> Currently this gets the doc count for each term:
>
> if( sfield != null && sfield.indexed() ) {
> Query q = qp.parse( fieldName+":[* TO *]" );
> int docCount = searcher.numDocs( q, matchAllDocs );
That looks like it gets the doc count for each field, as opposed to each term.
> Looking at it again, that could be replaced with:
>
> if( sfield != null && sfield.indexed() ) {
> Query q = qp.parse( fieldName+":[* TO *]" );
> int docCount = searcher.getDocSet( q ).size();
Correct. Unfortunately it probably won't save you much (one set intersection).
I don't (currently) know of a way to get this info quicker.
In a specific application, the fastest way would be to index a boolean
or another single token for each document that had the field you were
interested in then count the number of docs for the single token
rather than all tokens in the field.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
> Is there any faster option then running a query for each field?
>
> thanks
> ryan
>
Re: Luke / get doc count for each term
On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote: Is there a faster way to check the number of documents for each field? Currently this gets the doc count for each term: In the past, I've created a field that contains the names of the Fields present on the document. Then, simply facet on the new Field. I think that gets you what you want and the mechanism is all built in to Solr and is quite speedy.
DisMaxRequestHandler usage
Hi, I have this standard query: q=(field1:hello OR field2:hello) AND (field3:world) Can I use dismax handler for this (applying the same search term on field1 and field2, but keep field3 with something separate)? If it can be done, what's the advantage of doing it this way over using the standard query? thanks. _ Microsoft brings you a new way to search the web. Try Bing™ now http://www.bing.com?form=MFEHPG&publ=WLHMTAG&crea=TEXT_MFEHPG_Core_tagline_try bing_1x1
Re: Using Lucene Filter with SolrIndexSearcher
Ah, right. FilteredQuery works just great Thanks, Yonik Best, .Alek On Jun 16, 2009, at 9:45 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Aleksandar Bradic wrote: Any ideas on how to use custom Lucene Filter (lucene.search.Filter) in conjuction with SolrIndexSearcher ? You can wrap the original query with a FilteredQuery class, or create a DocSet from the Filter via SolrIndexSearcher.convertFilter() -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com The case is writing custom Filter performing arbitrary records selection and AND-ing it to the existing filters passed in the query. However, the ResponseBuilder filters are Query objects, and there is no visible means of mixing those with Filter's in the standard QueryCommand object. (There is a search(Query query, Filter filter, Sort sort) method that allow passing of Filter but no way of mixing it with existing query. Also, using this means immediate loss of all caching benefits etc.). Any other idea on how to pass a custom filter applying arbitrary user-defined logic (for example "random drop of 30% records from result set"), to standard query would be useful as well. Thanks, .Alek
NPE while sorting
Hi, Solr is throwing Null pointer exception when soring on a field. http://localhost:9080/solr/select?version=2.2&q=*:*&qt=geo&lat=41.883784 &long=-87.637668&radius=25&rows=100&sort=geo_distance%20top Using 16-June build. Any pointers ?? HTTP Status 500 - null java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.lucene.search.SortField.getComparator(SortField.java:483) at org.apache.lucene.search.FieldValueHitQueue$OneComparatorFieldValueHitQu eue.(FieldValueHitQueue.java:80) at org.apache.lucene.search.FieldValueHitQueue.create(FieldValueHitQueue.ja va:190) at org.apache.lucene.search.TopFieldCollector.create(TopFieldCollector.java :851) at org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher.getDocListNC(SolrIndexSearcher. java:972) at org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher.getDocListC(SolrIndexSearcher.j ava:880) at org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher.search(SolrIndexSearcher.java:3 37) at org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher.getDocList(SolrIndexSearcher.ja va:1149) at com.pjaol.search.solr.component.LocalSolrQueryComponent.process(LocalSol rQueryComponent.java:286) at org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(Search Handler.java:195) at org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerB ase.java:131) at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:1328) at org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.execute(SolrDispatchFilter.ja va:341) at org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.j ava:244) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(Applica tionFilterChain.java:215) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilt erChain.java:188) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValv e.java:213) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValv e.java:174) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java :127) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java :117) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve. java:108) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:1 51) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:87 4) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.proc essConnection(Http11BaseProtocol.java:665) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint .java:528) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollow erWorkerThread.java:81) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool .java:689) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
Re: NPE while sorting
Looks like this is the local-solr patch, which isn't part of Solr yet? -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Nirkhe, Chandra wrote: > Hi, > Solr is throwing Null pointer exception when soring on a field. > > > http://localhost:9080/solr/select?version=2.2&q=*:*&qt=geo&lat=41.883784 > &long=-87.637668&radius=25&rows=100&sort=geo_distance%20top > > > Using 16-June build. Any pointers ?? > > > HTTP Status 500 - null java.lang.NullPointerException at > org.apache.lucene.search.SortField.getComparator(SortField.java:483) at > org.apache.lucene.search.FieldValueHitQueue$OneComparatorFieldValueHitQu > eue.(FieldValueHitQueue.java:80) at > org.apache.lucene.search.FieldValueHitQueue.create(FieldValueHitQueue.ja > va:190) at > org.apache.lucene.search.TopFieldCollector.create(TopFieldCollector.java > :851) at > org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher.getDocListNC(SolrIndexSearcher. > java:972) at > org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher.getDocListC(SolrIndexSearcher.j > ava:880) at > org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher.search(SolrIndexSearcher.java:3 > 37) at > org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher.getDocList(SolrIndexSearcher.ja > va:1149) at > com.pjaol.search.solr.component.LocalSolrQueryComponent.process(LocalSol > rQueryComponent.java:286) at > org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(Search > Handler.java:195) at > org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerB > ase.java:131) at > org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:1328) at > org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.execute(SolrDispatchFilter.ja > va:341) at > org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.j > ava:244) at > org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(Applica > tionFilterChain.java:215) at > org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilt > erChain.java:188) at > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValv > e.java:213) at > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValv > e.java:174) at > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java > :127) at > org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java > :117) at > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve. > java:108) at > org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:1 > 51) at > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:87 > 4) at > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.proc > essConnection(Http11BaseProtocol.java:665) at > org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint > .java:528) at > org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollow > erWorkerThread.java:81) at > org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool > .java:689) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) >
Re: Luke / get doc count for each term
On Jun 16, 2009, at 5:21 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote: Is there a faster way to check the number of documents for each field? Currently this gets the doc count for each term: In the past, I've created a field that contains the names of the Fields present on the document. Then, simply facet on the new Field. I think that gets you what you want and the mechanism is all built in to Solr and is quite speedy. makes sense -- i like this idea. ryan
Re: localsolr sort
Haven't tried the 14th build, but the latest stable version is available on http://www.nsshutdown.com/solr-example.tgz Built last week -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/localsolr-sort-tp24040799p24065745.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
what date format to pass for search in Solr?
Hi Does anyone know what date format pass to search in Solr? Could you give me any examples for search with Date in solr? Regards, Leahina
Re: Range queries
And how about this - x:{5 TO 8} AND x:5
Cheers
Avlesh
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Peter Keegan wrote:
> How about this: x:[5 TO 8] AND x:{0 TO 8}
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
> otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think the square brackets/curly braces need to be balanced, so this is
> > currently not doable with existing query parsers.
> >
> > Otis
> > --
> > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
> >
> >
> >
> > - Original Message
> > > From: gwk
> > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 11:52:12 AM
> > > Subject: Range queries
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > When doing range queries it seems the query is either x:[5 TO 8] which
> > means 5
> > > <= x <= 8 or x:{5 TO 8} which means 5 < x < 8. But how do you get one
> > half
> > > exclusive, the other inclusive for double fields the following: 5 <= x
> <
> > 8? Is
> > > this possible?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > gwk
> >
> >
>
Re: Range queries
Really sorry, this is what I meant: x:{5 TO 8} OR x:5
Cheers
Avlesh
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> And how about this - x:{5 TO 8} AND x:5
>
> Cheers
> Avlesh
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Peter Keegan wrote:
>
>> How about this: x:[5 TO 8] AND x:{0 TO 8}
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
>> otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I think the square brackets/curly braces need to be balanced, so this is
>> > currently not doable with existing query parsers.
>> >
>> > Otis
>> > --
>> > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > - Original Message
>> > > From: gwk
>> > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 11:52:12 AM
>> > > Subject: Range queries
>> > >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > When doing range queries it seems the query is either x:[5 TO 8] which
>> > means 5
>> > > <= x <= 8 or x:{5 TO 8} which means 5 < x < 8. But how do you get one
>> > half
>> > > exclusive, the other inclusive for double fields the following: 5 <= x
>> <
>> > 8? Is
>> > > this possible?
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > >
>> > > gwk
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
