Alpha numeric sort problem
Hello, I have following entry in my title list: Content1 Content2 Content3 Content4 Content5 If I try to Sort it in ascending or descending order, I am getting same order. I am using following alphaOnlySort field and text. Please let me know if I miss anything here. Thanks in advance for looking into this issue. -Thanks and Regards, kmu
SolrQuery.add
Hi,
I'm having problems using SolrQuery.add(String, String).
My Sample code is:
SolrQuery anotherQuery = new SolrQuery();
anotherQuery.add("city", cmd.getCity());
I get the following error:
null java.lang.NullPointerException at
org.apache.solr.common.util.StrUtils.splitSmart(StrUtils.java:36) at
org.apache.solr.search.OldLuceneQParser.parse(LuceneQParserPlugin.java:104)
at org.apache.solr.search.QParser.getQuery(QParser.java:80) at
org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.prepare(QueryComponent.java:66)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(SearchHandler.java:143)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:117)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:902) at
org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.execute(SolrDispatchFilter.java:280)
at
org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:237)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:202)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:173)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:213)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:178)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:126)
at
org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:105)
at
org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:541)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:107)
at
org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:148)
at
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:869)
at
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11BaseProtocol.java:664)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
request:
http://localhost.local:8080/solr/select?city=Berlin&wt=xml&version=2.2
If I do it like that:
SolrQuery query = new SolrQuery();
query.setQuery("city:" + cmd.getCity() + " AND age:24");
Everything works fine.
It's not a real problem because the second version does the job, but the
code is quite ugly.
Thanks for your help,
Matthias
Re: Filter Query and query score
Hi, I also have the same problem. My case is similar like this, but the user can select their preferences. I´ll use climbingrose´s example but add it a little bit. Doc1: [Title=Java; Location=Parramatta, NSW; latitude=x1; longitude=x2] Doc2: [Title=Java; Location=North Ryde, NSW; latitude=x3; longitude=x4] Doc3: [Title=Java; Location=Parramatta] Doc4: [Title=Java; Location=NS, NSW; latitude=x1; longitude=x2] Doc5: [Title=Java; Location=NS, NSW; latitude=x3; longitude=x4] Doc6: [Title=Java; Location=Parramatta] For example the user query is Java and their preferences are Paramatta and NS, so I would like to boost the documents with location Paramatta or NS. But still I want to show the result from another location. How do I use it in bq? Can I use it like this: bq=location:Parramatta^1.4 || location:NS^1.4 is that correct? I tried but it seems it didn´t work. So the final result I want that NS and Paramatta get a little boost to the top and NOrth Ryde goes to the bottom. Is that possible? Thanx - Ted - Mike Klaas wrote: > > On 1-Jan-08, at 11:54 PM, climbingrose wrote: >> >> Doc1: [Title=Java; Location=Parramatta, NSW; latitude=x1; >> longitude=x2] >> Doc2: [Title=Java; Location=North Ryde, NSW; latitude=x3; >> longitude=x4] >> Doc3: [Title=Java; Location=Parramatta] >> >> My filter query looks like this: >> >> fq= (+latitude[lat1 TO lat2] +longitude[lng1 TO lng2]) >> location:Parramatta >> location:NSW >> >> Now assuming that my query matches those three documents, I need to >> make >> sure that documents with "Parramatta" in their locations have some >> kind of >> boost to the final score. For example, I'd like to have Doc3 listed >> before >> Doc2 because it has "Parramatta" in location field. >> >> Is this possible? Thanks in advance! > > Sure, just also add a boost parameter: > > fq= (+latitude[lat1 TO lat2] +longitude[lng1 TO lng2]) > location:Parramatta location:NSW > bq=location:Parramatta^1.4 > > -Mike > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Filter-Query-and-query-score-tp14574793p15480679.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Facing problem with the FieldType of UniqueField
Hi, Initially, in my schema, I had my uniqueField's field type as "string" and everything was working fine. But, then the users of my application wanted to search on the unique field and entered values which were in a different case than what was indexed. They never got proper results, at times, no results. I noticed this happened because the field type was "string". I then changed it to a custom text type and had specified only the whitespace tokenizer and lowercase filter. It worked. The users were able to search on the uniqueField irrespective of the case the values were entered in. But now, another problem has risen. If I update a document, it really does not update, but it is added as a separate document with the same uniqueField value and the contents of the old document is merged with the new one. So, now what I want to achieve is that the users should be able to search on the uniqueField, irrespective of the case the values are entered in; and on updation of a document, not to have duplicate documents (documents with the same uniqueField value) in the index. Can anyone help me in as to how this can be done? Regards, Rishabh
Re: DisMaxHandler and plone advanced searches
On 14/02/2008, at 00:58, Mike Klaas wrote: On 13-Feb-08, at 6:11 PM, Leonardo Santagada wrote: On 13/02/2008, at 23:03, Mike Klaas wrote: Try using standardrequesthandler with the dismax query parser. How can I say to standardrequesthandler to apply each query string to a diferent field, and how can I conbine the two on the config xml? A little example would be cool. I don't see how you could pre-configure this in solrconfig.xml: how do you specific which querystring gets sent to which field? Just send the query to stdreq handler as follows: q=field1: field2: see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax Yes, that is what we are doing now, but and use the full lucene sintax and not the one from dismax query parser. I would like to be able to do a search like the one above but with the dismax query parser for ans . Is that possible in any way? -- Leonardo Santagada
Re: Alpha numeric sort problem
I admit I know little about SOLR, but wouldn't an AlphaOnlySorter ignore the digits? Erick On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Mahesh Udupa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I have following entry in my title list: > > Content1 > Content2 > Content3 > Content4 > Content5 > > If I try to Sort it in ascending or descending order, I am getting same > order. > > I am using following alphaOnlySort field and text. > Please let me know if I miss anything here. > > Thanks in advance for looking into this issue. > > -Thanks and Regards, > kmu > > > sortMissingLast="true" omitNorms="true"> > > > > > > > > >pattern="([^a-z])" replacement="" replace="all" >/> > > > > > > > > > > splitOnCaseChange="1" generateWordParts="1" generateNumberParts="0" > catenateWords="1" catenateNumbers="0" catenateAll="1"/> > > > > > > > ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/> > > splitOnCaseChange="1" generateWordParts="1" generateNumberParts="0" > catenateWords="1" catenateNumbers="0" catenateAll="1"/> > > > > > > > > > positionIncrementGap="100" > > > > ignoreCase="true" expand="false"/> > > generateWordParts="0" generateNumberParts="0" catenateWords="1" > catenateNumbers="1" catenateAll="0"/> > > > > > >
Re: Facing problem with the FieldType of UniqueField
I noticed this happened because the field type was "string". I then changed it to a custom text type and had specified only the whitespace tokenizer and lowercase filter. It worked. The users were able to search on the are there spaces in your unique key? Try using the KeywordTokenizer -- the main concern with the field type for uniqueKey is to make sure it only has one token. ryan
How to search multiphrase or a middle term in a word???
Hi All, I am facing a problem when search for multiphrases in a word. My index data is : srinivasan,sweetheart,thomasmaster,thomasMaster.(totally 4 words) Scenario : 1 Search data : vasan If i search for "vasan", its return nothing. But the result should be "srinivasan". Like that, if i search for "hear", its return nothing. The result should be "sweetheart". The indexing data is correct while indexig. Scenario : 2 Search data : Master or master if i search for "master" or "Master" (Please note the word cases), its returning only "thosmasMaster". But it has to return both "thomasmaster" and "thomasMaster". But mainly, i am unable to search a middle term in a word. I have attached my schema.xml with this mail. Please help me out. Thanks in advance. http://www.nabble.com/file/p15484754/schema.xml schema.xml with Regards, Nithya. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-search-multiphrase-or-a-middle-term-in-a-wordtp15484754p15484754.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: solr to work for my web application
It should be easy to configure SOLR Schema, & use SOLRJ client; does not matter jetty/tomcat etc.; stick with simple SOLRJ java client: access database, generate SOLR document, update SOLR, execute query, parse (SOLRJ->SolrDocument), generate content, etc... Much easier, scalable, and more effective than XSLT (initial version of my website was Cocoon&SAXON powered; it was ugly...). www.tokenizer.org > > Hey hi... > > Ya the content is generated dynamically from a database...but > all data in > the xml docs(parameters in it) will have same structure as > specified in the > schema..e.g all will have uniquekey parameter set as "csid". > > I am adding particular case studies in my database with all > information like > name, address...also tags. Then I want to search those case > studies on the > basis of tags added. I have set up solr for that but I am > starting it using > jetty server. I think I will have to start it thru tomcat itself. > > Any quotes? > > Funtick wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > As I understood, you need a search for your web application. > > > > - How many pages it has? > > - Is content generated dynamically from a database (for instance)? > > > > Another problem: after updating solrschema.xml you need > > - restart SOLR > > - reindex SOLR > > > > With changing unique ID in schema... I don't remember, but > it should be of > > specific type. You probably need to reindex SOLR. > > > > If your application generates dynamic content, it would be > better to index > > database directly adding 'URL' field to SOLR schema. > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/solr-to-work-for-my-web-application-tp15 450968p15474490.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Filter Query and query score
On 14-Feb-08, at 6:51 AM, tedonk03 wrote: Hi, I also have the same problem. My case is similar like this, but the user can select their preferences. I´ll use climbingrose´s example but add it a little bit. Doc1: [Title=Java; Location=Parramatta, NSW; latitude=x1; longitude=x2] Doc2: [Title=Java; Location=North Ryde, NSW; latitude=x3; longitude=x4] Doc3: [Title=Java; Location=Parramatta] Doc4: [Title=Java; Location=NS, NSW; latitude=x1; longitude=x2] Doc5: [Title=Java; Location=NS, NSW; latitude=x3; longitude=x4] Doc6: [Title=Java; Location=Parramatta] For example the user query is Java and their preferences are Paramatta and NS, so I would like to boost the documents with location Paramatta or NS. But still I want to show the result from another location. How do I use it in bq? Can I use it like this: bq=location:Parramatta^1.4 || location:NS^1.4 "or" is implied: bq=location:Parramatta^1.4 location:NS^1.4 alternatively, you can use multiple bq's bq=location:Parramatta^1.4 bq=location:NS^1.4 see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax -Mike
Re: Alpha numeric sort problem
Thanks Erick for your quick response. Even I tried with *text* Field type. But no use. As splitOnCaseChange="1", do we have splitOnLetterToNumberChange or something like that? Thanks in advance kmu On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Erick Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I admit I know little about SOLR, but wouldn't an AlphaOnlySorter ignore > the digits? > > Erick > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Mahesh Udupa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I have following entry in my title list: > > > > Content1 > > Content2 > > Content3 > > Content4 > > Content5 > > > > If I try to Sort it in ascending or descending order, I am getting same > > order. > > > > I am using following alphaOnlySort field and text. > > Please let me know if I miss anything here. > > > > Thanks in advance for looking into this issue. > > > > -Thanks and Regards, > > kmu > > > > > > > sortMissingLast="true" omitNorms="true"> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >pattern="([^a-z])" replacement="" replace="all" > >/> > > > > > > > > > > > positionIncrementGap="100"> > > > > > > > > > > > splitOnCaseChange="1" generateWordParts="1" generateNumberParts="0" > > catenateWords="1" catenateNumbers="0" catenateAll="1"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/> > > > > > splitOnCaseChange="1" generateWordParts="1" generateNumberParts="0" > > catenateWords="1" catenateNumbers="0" catenateAll="1"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > positionIncrementGap="100" > > > > > > > > ignoreCase="true" expand="false"/> > > > > > generateWordParts="0" generateNumberParts="0" catenateWords="1" > > catenateNumbers="1" catenateAll="0"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: Alpha numeric sort problem
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Mahesh Udupa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Even I tried with *text* Field type. But no use. > As splitOnCaseChange="1", do we have splitOnLetterToNumberChange or > something like that? Sorting requires a single token in the field (you want to sort on the whole value). Try type "string". -Yonik
Re: Facing problem with the FieldType of UniqueField
Ryan, Using the KeywordTokenizer does not help. And there are not any spaces in the unique keys. the keys are alpha numeric. E.g.: AA-23-E1 Regards, Rishabh On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I noticed this happened because the field type was "string". I then > changed > > it to a custom text type and had specified only the whitespace tokenizer > and > > lowercase filter. It worked. The users were able to search on the > > are there spaces in your unique key? Try using the KeywordTokenizer -- > the main concern with the field type for uniqueKey is to make sure it > only has one token. > > ryan >
Re: Facing problem with the FieldType of UniqueField
Bottomline: it's very hard to get everything right with having a uniqueKey field that uses TextField. if your goal is to let your users do case insnsitive or "single word" queries on your uniqueKey field, just just copyFiled to clone it into something more search friendly. -Hoss
Re: SolrJ and Unique Doc ID
: > How do I generate URLs to retrieve a document against any given Solr : > instance that I happen to be pointing at without knowing which field is the : > document id? : : One cool technique, not instead of your change to Luke RH (a needed change : IMO) but another way to go about it - we have a DocumentRequestHandler that : takes a uniqueKey parameter that would retrieve and return that single : document without having to specify the field name explicitly. Erik's idea eliminates the need to know what the "name" of the uniqueKey field is when formulating the query to "fetch one", but it doesn't solve the crux of grants question: when looking at a list of results (with a partial "fl" for example) how can you know which value to use to later query on and get back just thta document (with the full "fl" for example) My point was that while knowing the uniqueKey field solves the problem, the person setting up the index may not want clients to know this ... the clinet has to have *some* pre-existing knowledge about the structure of the index ... grant's Luke patch solves this by letting the client get this information from Luke, but in a general case a Solr Admin may not want to expose that info to his clients (ie: the customerId vs SSN example from my previous mail) ... so a general purpose client should probably have a more general way to configure the "what field do i treat as unique" info without requirng that the LukeHandler be available. -Hoss
Re: Highlighting the search results
: I have created a Index of some xml files (xml's was created from mysql : database) with solr. In xml's I have one text field. (more than 1000 : characters). Its searches fine, but solr result page is too long. I have : tried highlight (&hl=on&hl.fl=fname), its shows highlighting results at end : of xml in new tag, but I want an original result tag highlighted. the main docset allways shows you the full stored value of any field. if you only want the "fragmented" highlight info, just leave the big field out of your "fl". merging the data from the main result set and the hight data is something that can be done fairly easily by the client (or a stylesheet, etc) so it is not handled internally in Solr. (that's one of the guiding principles of Solr features: "do things in the server that would be harder or more expensive to do in the client, don't do things that the client can do just as cheaply/easily.") -Hoss
RE: solr to work for my web application
My eclipse IDE still gives me suggestion that JNDI is not set properly...How to set JNDI for solr? I am using tomcat5.5.23 and added solr.xml with context fragments inside the tomact5.5/../catalina/localhost. Is it the correct way of doing it? Or do i need to add context fragment in the server.xml file in conf dir of tomcat? It is easy to start server using jetty externally, however I want solr to be up and running through tomcat, is it possible? If yes please tell me the helpful resources or any suggestions from your side... Thanks in advance... Funtick wrote: > > It should be easy to configure SOLR Schema, & use SOLRJ client; does not > matter jetty/tomcat etc.; stick with simple SOLRJ java client: access > database, generate SOLR document, update SOLR, execute query, parse > (SOLRJ->SolrDocument), generate content, etc... Much easier, scalable, and > more effective than XSLT (initial version of my website was Cocoon&SAXON > powered; it was ugly...). > www.tokenizer.org > >> >> Hey hi... >> >> Ya the content is generated dynamically from a database...but >> all data in >> the xml docs(parameters in it) will have same structure as >> specified in the >> schema..e.g all will have uniquekey parameter set as "csid". >> >> I am adding particular case studies in my database with all >> information like >> name, address...also tags. Then I want to search those case >> studies on the >> basis of tags added. I have set up solr for that but I am >> starting it using >> jetty server. I think I will have to start it thru tomcat itself. >> >> Any quotes? >> >> Funtick wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > As I understood, you need a search for your web application. >> > >> > - How many pages it has? >> > - Is content generated dynamically from a database (for instance)? >> > >> > Another problem: after updating solrschema.xml you need >> > - restart SOLR >> > - reindex SOLR >> > >> > With changing unique ID in schema... I don't remember, but >> it should be of >> > specific type. You probably need to reindex SOLR. >> > >> > If your application generates dynamic content, it would be >> better to index >> > database directly adding 'URL' field to SOLR schema. >> > >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/solr-to-work-for-my-web-application-tp15 > 450968p15474490.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/solr-to-work-for-my-web-application-tp15450968p15495846.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Highlighting the search results
Ok, Thanks.. On 2/15/08, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > : I have created a Index of some xml files (xml's was created from mysql > : database) with solr. In xml's I have one text field. (more than 1000 > : characters). Its searches fine, but solr result page is too long. I have > : tried highlight (&hl=on&hl.fl=fname), its shows highlighting results at > end > : of xml in new tag, but I want an original result tag highlighted. > > > the main docset allways shows you the full stored value of any field. if > you only want the "fragmented" highlight info, just leave the big field > out of your "fl". merging the data from the main result set and the hight > data is something that can be done fairly easily by the client (or a > stylesheet, etc) so it is not handled internally in Solr. > > (that's one of the guiding principles of Solr features: "do things in the > server that would be harder or more expensive to do in the client, > don't do things that the client can do just as cheaply/easily.") > > > -Hoss > > -- Thanks, Laxmilal menaria http://www.chambal.com/ http://www.minalyzer.com/ http://www.bucketexplorer.com/
Re: FunctionQuery step function
: We'd like to restrict older modified documents with a step function, rather : bf="map(map(modified,0,0,today),0,12monthago,0.2) : map(map(modified,0,0,today),12monthago,6monthago,0.3) : map(map(modified,0,0,today),6monthsago,today,1)" : : is this inefficient? For something like this, i would just use bq instead of bf ... i don't know that it's more efficient per se, but i'm guessing it would be, and it's certinaly easier to understand (to me anyway)... bq=modified:[NOW/DAY-6MONTHS TO *]^1 modified:[NOW/DAY-1YEAR TO NOW/DAY-6MONTHS TO *]^0.3 modified:[* TO NOW/DAY-1YEAR]^0.3 (the score values may not work out to exactly the same because of hte way FUnctionQuery works, but that's just a matter of twiddling the boosts untill you get what you want) -Hoss
Re: solr to work for my web application
Hi Thorsten... SOrry for giving u much trouble but I need some answer regarding solr...plz help... Question1 I am using tomcat 5.5.23 so for JNDI setup of solr, adding solr.xml with context fragment as below in the tomcat5.5/...catalina/localhost. Is it the correct way of doing it? Or do I need to add context fragment in the server.xml of tomcat5.5? Question2 I am starting solr server using start.jar from another location on C: drive...whereas my home location indicated on D: drive. Is it the root coz I am not getting the search result? Question3 I have added parameter as C:\solr\data in solrconfig.xml...but the indexes are not getting stored there...indexes for search are getting stored in the default dir of solr...any suggestions Thanks in advance... Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 05:04 -0800, newBea wrote: >> I havnt used luke.xsl. Ya but the link provided by u gives me "Solr Luke >> Request Handler Response"... >> >> is simple string as: csid > > So you have: > csid > > and > required="true" /> > > >> >> till now I am updating docs thru command prompt as : post.jar *.xml >> http://localhost:8983/update > > how do the docs look like? I mean since you changed the sample config > you send changed documents as well, right? How do they look? > >> >> I am not clear on how do I post xml docs > > Well like you said, with the post.jar and then you will send your > modified docs but there are many ways to trigger an add command to solr. > >> or wud xml docs be posted while I >> request solr thru tomcat at the time of searching text... > > To search text from tomcat you will need to have a servlet or something > similar that contacts the solr server for the search result and the > handle the response (e.g. apply custom xsl to the results). > > > >> >> This manually procedure when I update the xml docs on exampledocs folder >> inside distribution package restrict it to exampledocs itself > > No, either copy the jar to the folder where you have your documents or > add it to the PATH. > >> ...I am not >> getting a way where my sites text get searched by solr...Do I need to >> copy >> start.jar and relevant folders in my working directory for web >> application. > > Hmm, it seems that you not have understood the second paragraph of > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/mySolr > > "Typically it's not recommended to have your front end users/clients > hitting Solr directly as part of an HTML form submit ... the more > conventional way to think of it is that Solr is a backend service, which > your application can talk to over HTTP ..." > > Meaning you have two different server running. Alternatively you can run > solr in the same tomcat as you application. If you follow SolrTomcat > from the wiki it will be install as "solr" servlet. Your application > will then communicate with this serlvet. > > salu2 > >> >> any help? >> >> Thorsten Scherler-3 wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 03:42 -0800, newBea wrote: >> >> Hi Thorsten, >> >> >> >> I have my application running on 8080 port with tomcat 5.5.23I am >> >> starting solr on port 8983 with jetty server using command "java -jar >> >> start.jar". >> >> >> >> Both the server gets started...now any search I make on tomcat >> >> application >> >> is interacting with solr very well. The problem is "schema.xml" and >> >> "solrconfig.xml" in the conf directory are default one. But after >> adding >> >> customized schema name parameter and required fields, solr is not >> working >> >> as >> >> required. >> > >> > Can you post the modification you made to both files? >> > >> >> >> >> Customized code for parsing the xml generated from solr is working >> >> fine...but it is unable to find the uniquekey field which we set for >> all >> >> the >> >> documents in the schema documentand thus result is 0 means >> nothing. >> >> >> > >> > Hmm, what is your update command and your unique key? >> > >> > We would need to see this modification to tell you what may be wrong. >> > >> > Did you try http://YOUR_HOST:8983/solr/admin/luke?wt=xslt&tr=luke.xsl >> > >> > What does this gives? >> > >> > salu2 >> > >> >> I am not able to find the solution for this one... any suggestions wud >> be >> >> appreciated...thanks in advance. >> >> >> >> Thorsten Scherler-3 wrote: >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 00:06 -0800, newBea wrote: >> >> >> hi >> >> >> >> >> >> I am new to solr/lucene...I have installed solr nightly >> version..its >> >> >> working >> >> >> very fine. >> >> >> >> >> >> But it is working for the exampledocs present in the example folder >> of >> >> >> the >> >> >> nightly version of solr. I need solr to work for my current web >> >> >> application...I am using tomcat5.5.23 for the >> >> >> application(Windows)...using >> >> >> jetty to start solr from outside of the webapps folder. >> >> >> >> >> >> Is there any way to start the jetty using tomcat? >> >> >> >> >> >> Help would be appreciated.
