fieldNorm seems to be killing my score
Hi, I've been trying to debug why one of my test cases doesn't work. I have an index with two documents in, one talking mostly about apples and one talking mostly about oranges (for the sake of this test case) both of which have 'test_site' in their site field. If I run the query +(apple^4 orange) +(site:"test_site") I would expect the document which talks about apples to always apear first but it does not. Looking at the debug output (below) it looks like fieldNorm is killing the first part of the query. Why is this and how can I stop it? 0 4 10 0 on +(apple^4 orange) +(site:"test_site") on 2.2 test_index-test_site-integration:124 test_index /oranges test_site orange orange orange orange test_index-test_site-integration:123 test_index /me test_site apple apple apple apple +(apple^4 orange) +(site:"test_site") +(apple^4 orange) +(site:"test_site") +(text:appl^4.0 text:orang) +site:test_site +(text:appl^4.0 text:orang) +site:test_site 0.14332592 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.0 = (MATCH) product of: 0.0 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.0 = (MATCH) weight(text:orang in 13), product of: 0.24034579 = queryWeight(text:orang), product of: 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) 0.1254224 = queryNorm 0.0 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(text:orang in 13), product of: 2.236068 = tf(termFreq(text:orang)=5) 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) 0.0 = fieldNorm(field=text, doc=13) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.14332592 = (MATCH) weight(site:test_site in 13), product of: 0.13407566 = queryWeight(site:test_site), product of: 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) 0.1254224 = queryNorm 1.0689929 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(site:test_site in 13), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(site:test_site)=1) 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) 1.0 = fieldNorm(field=site, doc=13) 0.14332592 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.0 = (MATCH) product of: 0.0 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.0 = (MATCH) weight(text:appl^4.0 in 14), product of: 0.96138316 = queryWeight(text:appl^4.0), product of: 4.0 = boost 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) 0.1254224 = queryNorm 0.0 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(text:appl in 14), product of: 2.236068 = tf(termFreq(text:appl)=5) 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) 0.0 = fieldNorm(field=text, doc=14) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.14332592 = (MATCH) weight(site:test_site in 14), product of: 0.13407566 = queryWeight(site:test_site), product of: 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) 0.1254224 = queryNorm 1.0689929 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(site:test_site in 14), product of: 1.0 = tf(termFreq(site:test_site)=1) 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) 1.0 = fieldNorm(field=site, doc=14)
how to create a filter factory in solr
Hello there, I want to create an Arabic filter and Arabic filter factory to add in solr jar to use in my application, could u give me any guides on how to do that ?? Thanks in advance
unsubscribe
Re: fieldNorm seems to be killing my score
Hmmm, a norm of 0.0??? That implies that the boost for that field (text) was set to zero when it was indexed. How did you index the data (straight HTTP, SolrJ, etc)? What does your schema for this field (and copyFields) look like? -Yonik On 11/1/07, Robert Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've been trying to debug why one of my test cases doesn't work. I > have an index with two documents in, one talking mostly about apples > and one talking mostly about oranges (for the sake of this test case) > both of which have 'test_site' in their site field. If I run the query > +(apple^4 orange) +(site:"test_site") I would expect the document > which talks about apples to always apear first but it does not. > Looking at the debug output (below) it looks like fieldNorm is killing > the first part of the query. Why is this and how can I stop it? > > > > > > 0 > 4 > > 10 > 0 > > on > +(apple^4 orange) +(site:"test_site") > on > 2.2 > > > > > > test_index-test_site-integration:124 > test_index > /oranges > test_site > orange orange orange > orange > > > > test_index-test_site-integration:123 > test_index > /me > test_site > apple apple apple > > apple > > > > +(apple^4 orange) +(site:"test_site") > +(apple^4 orange) +(site:"test_site") > +(text:appl^4.0 text:orang) +site:test_site > +(text:appl^4.0 text:orang) > +site:test_site > > > > 0.14332592 = (MATCH) sum of: > 0.0 = (MATCH) product of: > 0.0 = (MATCH) sum of: > 0.0 = (MATCH) weight(text:orang in 13), product of: > 0.24034579 = queryWeight(text:orang), product of: > 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) > 0.1254224 = queryNorm > 0.0 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(text:orang in 13), product of: > 2.236068 = tf(termFreq(text:orang)=5) > 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) > 0.0 = fieldNorm(field=text, doc=13) > 0.5 = coord(1/2) > 0.14332592 = (MATCH) weight(site:test_site in 13), product of: > 0.13407566 = queryWeight(site:test_site), product of: > 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) > 0.1254224 = queryNorm > 1.0689929 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(site:test_site in 13), product of: > 1.0 = tf(termFreq(site:test_site)=1) > 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) > 1.0 = fieldNorm(field=site, doc=13) > > > 0.14332592 = (MATCH) sum of: > 0.0 = (MATCH) product of: > 0.0 = (MATCH) sum of: > 0.0 = (MATCH) weight(text:appl^4.0 in 14), product of: > 0.96138316 = queryWeight(text:appl^4.0), product of: > 4.0 = boost > 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) > 0.1254224 = queryNorm > 0.0 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(text:appl in 14), product of: > 2.236068 = tf(termFreq(text:appl)=5) > 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) > 0.0 = fieldNorm(field=text, doc=14) > 0.5 = coord(1/2) > 0.14332592 = (MATCH) weight(site:test_site in 14), product of: > 0.13407566 = queryWeight(site:test_site), product of: > 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) > 0.1254224 = queryNorm > 1.0689929 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(site:test_site in 14), product of: > 1.0 = tf(termFreq(site:test_site)=1) > 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) > 1.0 = fieldNorm(field=site, doc=14) > > > > >
SOLR 1.3: defaultOperator always defaults to OR although AND is specifed.
experimenting with SOLR 1.3 and discovered that although I specified in schema.xml q=a+b behaves as q=a OR B instead of q=a AND b Obviously this is not correct. I used the nightly of 29 oct. Cheers, Geert-Jan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SOLR-1.3%3A-defaultOperator-always-defaults-to-OR-although-AND-is-specifed.-tf4731773.html#a13529997 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SOLR 1.3: defaultOperator always defaults to OR although AND is specifed.
Try the latest... I just fixed this. -Yonik On 11/1/07, Britske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > experimenting with SOLR 1.3 and discovered that although I specified > in schema.xml > > q=a+b behaves as q=a OR B instead of q=a AND b > > Obviously this is not correct. > I used the nightly of 29 oct. > > Cheers, > Geert-Jan > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/SOLR-1.3%3A-defaultOperator-always-defaults-to-OR-although-AND-is-specifed.-tf4731773.html#a13529997 > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
Re: fieldNorm seems to be killing my score
Oooh! I think I'll just get my coat... My indexer was defaulting to zero for document boosts rather than 1. On 11/1/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmmm, a norm of 0.0??? That implies that the boost for that field > (text) was set to zero when it was indexed. > How did you index the data (straight HTTP, SolrJ, etc)? What does > your schema for this field (and copyFields) look like? > > -Yonik > > On 11/1/07, Robert Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been trying to debug why one of my test cases doesn't work. I > > have an index with two documents in, one talking mostly about apples > > and one talking mostly about oranges (for the sake of this test case) > > both of which have 'test_site' in their site field. If I run the query > > +(apple^4 orange) +(site:"test_site") I would expect the document > > which talks about apples to always apear first but it does not. > > Looking at the debug output (below) it looks like fieldNorm is killing > > the first part of the query. Why is this and how can I stop it? > > > > > > > > > > > > 0 > > 4 > > > > 10 > > 0 > > > > on > > +(apple^4 orange) +(site:"test_site") > > on > > 2.2 > > > > > > > > > > > > test_index-test_site-integration:124 > > test_index > > /oranges > > test_site > > orange orange orange > > orange > > > > > > > > test_index-test_site-integration:123 > > test_index > > /me > > test_site > > apple apple apple > > > > apple > > > > > > > > +(apple^4 orange) +(site:"test_site") > > +(apple^4 orange) +(site:"test_site") > > +(text:appl^4.0 text:orang) +site:test_site > > +(text:appl^4.0 text:orang) > > +site:test_site > > > > > > > > 0.14332592 = (MATCH) sum of: > > 0.0 = (MATCH) product of: > > 0.0 = (MATCH) sum of: > > 0.0 = (MATCH) weight(text:orang in 13), product of: > > 0.24034579 = queryWeight(text:orang), product of: > > 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) > > 0.1254224 = queryNorm > > 0.0 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(text:orang in 13), product of: > > 2.236068 = tf(termFreq(text:orang)=5) > > 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) > > 0.0 = fieldNorm(field=text, doc=13) > > 0.5 = coord(1/2) > > 0.14332592 = (MATCH) weight(site:test_site in 13), product of: > > 0.13407566 = queryWeight(site:test_site), product of: > > 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) > > 0.1254224 = queryNorm > > 1.0689929 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(site:test_site in 13), product of: > > 1.0 = tf(termFreq(site:test_site)=1) > > 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) > > 1.0 = fieldNorm(field=site, doc=13) > > > > > > 0.14332592 = (MATCH) sum of: > > 0.0 = (MATCH) product of: > > 0.0 = (MATCH) sum of: > > 0.0 = (MATCH) weight(text:appl^4.0 in 14), product of: > > 0.96138316 = queryWeight(text:appl^4.0), product of: > > 4.0 = boost > > 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) > > 0.1254224 = queryNorm > > 0.0 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(text:appl in 14), product of: > > 2.236068 = tf(termFreq(text:appl)=5) > > 1.9162908 = idf(docFreq=5) > > 0.0 = fieldNorm(field=text, doc=14) > > 0.5 = coord(1/2) > > 0.14332592 = (MATCH) weight(site:test_site in 14), product of: > > 0.13407566 = queryWeight(site:test_site), product of: > > 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) > > 0.1254224 = queryNorm > > 1.0689929 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(site:test_site in 14), product of: > > 1.0 = tf(termFreq(site:test_site)=1) > > 1.0689929 = idf(docFreq=13) > > 1.0 = fieldNorm(field=site, doc=14) > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: SOLR 1.3: defaultOperator always defaults to OR although AND is specifed.
thanks 2007/11/1, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Try the latest... I just fixed this. > -Yonik > > On 11/1/07, Britske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > experimenting with SOLR 1.3 and discovered that although I specified > > in schema.xml > > > > q=a+b behaves as q=a OR B instead of q=a AND b > > > > Obviously this is not correct. > > I used the nightly of 29 oct. > > > > Cheers, > > Geert-Jan > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/SOLR-1.3%3A-defaultOperator-always-defaults-to-OR-although-AND-is-specifed.-tf4731773.html#a13529997 > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > >
sorting results
sorry to be a numptie but can someone tell me how I change my results sort mechanism? It currently gives back the results ordered by highest ID first, which relates to last item entered or edited. I'd like it to sort alpha on the Title field instead. I'm using solr 1.1 and the example solr install from the download. I've made some adjustments to the config file, but I don't really know whats going on in there. Any help would be greatly appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/sorting-results-tf4732442.html#a13532142 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Alphabetical Facets
Will there be a way to do reverse alphabetical ordering in addition to alphabetical? a->z and z->a ? Thanks in advance. ryantxu wrote: > > Chris Hostetter wrote: >> : Has anyone given any thought to alphabetical faceting? >> >> if by alphabetical you mean the natural unicode ordering of terms for >> facet.field type facets -- that's already supported. >> >> It's the default sort if there is no facet limit (ie: facet.limit=-1) >> but >> even with a limit it can be explicitly turned on with facet.sort=false >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#head-569f93fb24ec41b061e37c702203c99d8853d5f1 >> http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*%3A*&facet=true&facet.field=cat&rows=0&facet.limit=5&facet.sort=false >> > > perfect! > > I read that, but did not realize "natural index order" is alphabetical > in the ascii range. > > thanks > ryan > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Alphabetical-Facets-tf3728353.html#a13533000 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Getting only size of getFacetCounts , to simulate count(group by( a field) ) using facets
Hi, Not sure what the resolution on this has been. But, I also have this need and I am using 1.2 release of solr. If there is a workaround so I can get this functionality, please advise. It will be very helpful. Thanks. Laurent Hoss wrote: > > Hi > > We want to (mis)use facet search to get the number of (unique) field > values appearing in a document resultset. > I thought facet search perfect for this, because it already gives me > all the (unique) field values. > But for us to be used for this special problem, we don't want all the > values listed in response as there might be over 1 and we don't need > the values at all, just the count of how many! > > I looked at > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters > and hoped to find a parameter like > facet.sizeOnly = true > (or facet.showSize=true , combined with facet.limit=1 or other small > value) > > Would you accept a patch with such a feature ? > > It should probably be relatively easy, though not sure if fits into the > concept of facets.. > > I looked at the code, maybe add an extra Value to returned NamedList of > getFacetCounts() in SimpleFacets ?! > > ps: Other user having same request AFAIU : > http://www.nabble.com/showing--range-facet-example-%3D-by-Range-%28-1-to-1000-%29-t3660704.html#a10229069 > > thanks, > > Laurent Hoss > > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Getting-only-size-of-getFacetCounts-%2C-to-simulate-count%28group-by%28-a-field%29-%29-using-facets-tf4482430.html#a13532933 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Phrase Query Performance Question
On 31-Oct-07, at 11:54 PM, Haishan Chen wrote: Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:54:53 -0700> Subject: Re: Phrase Query Performance Question> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr- [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "hurricane katrina" is a very expensive query against a collection> focused on Hurricane Katrina. There will be many matches in many> documents. If you want to measure worst-case, this is fine.> > I'd try other things, like:> > * ninth ward> * Ray Nagin> * Audubon Park> * Canal Street> * French Quarter> * FEMA mistakes> * storm surge> * Jackson Square> > Of course, real query logs are the only real test.> > wunder These terms are not frequent in my index. I believe they are going to be fast. The thing is that I feel 2 million documents is a small index. 100,000 or 200,000 hits is a small set and should always have sub second query performance. Now I am only querying one field and the response is almost one second. I feel I can't achieve sub second performance if I add a bit more complexity to the query. Many of the category terms in my index will appear in more than 5% of the documents and those category terms are very popular search terms. So the example I gave were not extreme cases for my index I think that you are somewhat misguided about what constitutes a small set. A query term that appears in 5-10% of the index in a natural language corpus is _extremely_ frequent. Not quite on the order of stopwords, but getting there. As a comparison, on an extremely large corpus that I have handy, documents containing both the word 'auto' and 'repair' (not necessarily adjacent) constitute 0.1% of the index. The frequency of the phrase "auto repair" is 0.025%. @200k docs would be the response rate from an 800million-doc corpus. What data are you indexing, what what is the intended effect of the phrase queries you are performing? Perhaps getting at the issue from this end would be more productive than hammering at the phrasequery performance question. When I start tomcat I saw this message: The Apache Tomcat Native library which allows optimal performance in production environments was not found on the java.library.path Is that mean if I use Apache Tomcat Native library the query performance will be better. Anyone has experience on that? Unlikely, though it might help you slightly at a high query rate with high cache hit ratios. -Mike
Solr-J: automatic url-escaping gives invalid uri exception. How to workaround?
I have a custom requesthandler which does some very basic dynamic parameter
substitution.
dynamic params are params which are enclosed in braces ({}).
So this means i can do something like this:
q={order}...
where {order} is substituted by the name of an existing order-column.
Now this all works well when i supply such a query directly as un url in
firefox / IE.
However when i supply a query through SOLR-J I get an "invalid URI"
exception as SOLR-J automatically URLEncodes the braces and then passes this
onto Apache-HttpClient, which chokes on the URLEncoded URI.
Is there any way around passing things as braces trough SOLR-J such that the
resulting URL is correctly interprested by HttpClient?
Geert-Jan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-J%3A-automatic-url-escaping-gives-invalid-uri-exception.-How-to-workaround--tf4733909.html#a13536871
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Solr-J: automatic url-escaping gives invalid uri exception. How to workaround?
I replaced { and } by (( resp. )). Not ideal (I like braces...) but it
suffices for now.
Still, if someone knows a general solution to the UrlEscaping-issue with
Solr-J i'd love to hear it.
Cheers,
Geert-Jan
Britske wrote:
>
> I have a custom requesthandler which does some very basic dynamic
> parameter substitution.
> dynamic params are params which are enclosed in braces ({}).
>
> So this means i can do something like this:
> q={order}...
>
> where {order} is substituted by the name of an existing order-column.
> Now this all works well when i supply such a query directly as un url in
> firefox / IE.
>
> However when i supply a query through SOLR-J I get an "invalid URI"
> exception as SOLR-J automatically URLEncodes the braces and then passes
> this onto Apache-HttpClient, which chokes on the URLEncoded URI.
>
> Is there any way around passing things as braces trough SOLR-J such that
> the resulting URL is correctly interprested by HttpClient?
>
> Geert-Jan
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-J%3A-automatic-url-escaping-gives-invalid-uri-exception.-How-to-workaround--tf4733909.html#a13537284
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: sorting results
: sorry to be a numptie but can someone tell me how I change my results sort : mechanism? : I'm using solr 1.1 and the example solr install from the download. I've check the copy of hte tutorial that is included with your version of Solr ... it describes how to do sorting with teh standard request handler (quick answer: put "; title asc" at the end of your q param) if you are using dismax (that was in Solr 1.1 right?) then it's a seperate "sort" param just like StandardREquestHandler uses right now (ie: q=bob+dole&sort=title+asc in either case, you need a field named "title" which is indexed and can't have multi-values ... which means if you use a TextField it needs to use KeywordTokenizer. fields you search on don't typically work well as sort fields for this reason, but using in your schema can give you one version for searching and one version forsorting. -Hoss
Re: how to create a filter factory in solr
: I want to create an Arabic filter and Arabic filter factory to add in : solr jar to use in my application, could u give me any guides on how to : do that ?? Step one is to create your Filter, this is completley independent of Solr, you can develop directly against the Lucene jar. ... write some unit tests that verify it does what you wnat it to do. Creating a Factory for your Filter is then trivial ... assuming your Filters don't have a lot of constructor options, they can be just a few lines of java code. for info on using them in Solr check out this wiki... http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins -Hoss
Re: How to get number of indexed documents?
/solr/admin/stats.jps is XML with a stylesheet. It contains stuff like this: 266687 wunder On 11/1/07 7:39 PM, "Papalagi Pakeha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Is there any way to get XML version of statistics like how many > documents are indexed etc? > > I have found http://.../solr/admin/properties which is cool but > doesn't give me the number of indexed documents. > > Thanks > > PaPa
Exception starting filter SolrRequestFilter in ubuntu 7.04,tomcat5.5
2007-11-2 10:27:58 org.apache.solr.core.Config getInstanceDir 信息: Using JNDI solr.home: /data/www/tomcat/webapps/solr 2007-11-2 10:27:58 org.apache.solr.core.Config setInstanceDir 信息: Solr home set to '/data/www/tomcat/webapps/solr/' 2007-11-2 10:27:58 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext filterStart 严重: Exception starting filter SolrRequestFilter java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class org.apache.solr.core.SolrConfig at org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.init( SolrDispatchFilter.java:74) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.getFilter( ApplicationFilterConfig.java:223) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.setFilterDef ( ApplicationFilterConfig.java:304) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.( ApplicationFilterConfig.java:77) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.filterStart( StandardContext.java :3634) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start( StandardContext.java:4217) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal( ContainerBase.java:759) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.access$0 ( ContainerBase.java:743) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase$PrivilegedAddChild.run( ContainerBase.java:143) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild ( ContainerBase.java:737) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild(StandardHost.java :524) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDescriptor( HostConfig.java:608) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDescriptors ( HostConfig.java:535) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployApps(HostConfig.java :470) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.start(HostConfig.java :1122) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.lifecycleEvent ( HostConfig.java:310) at org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleSupport.fireLifecycleEvent( LifecycleSupport.java:119) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java :1021) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.start(StandardHost.java :718) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java :1013) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine.start(StandardEngine.java:442) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService.start( StandardService.java:450) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.start(StandardServer.java :709) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start (Catalina.java:551) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke ( DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.start(Bootstrap.java:294) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0 (Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.commons.daemon.support.DaemonLoader.start( DaemonLoader.java:177) 2007-11-2 10:27:58 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start 严重: Error filterStart
How to get number of indexed documents?
Hello, Is there any way to get XML version of statistics like how many documents are indexed etc? I have found http://.../solr/admin/properties which is cool but doesn't give me the number of indexed documents. Thanks PaPa
Re: How to get number of indexed documents?
does http://.../solr/admin/luke work for you? 601818 ... On Nov 1, 2007, at 10:39 PM, Papalagi Pakeha wrote: Hello, Is there any way to get XML version of statistics like how many documents are indexed etc? I have found http://.../solr/admin/properties which is cool but doesn't give me the number of indexed documents. Thanks PaPa -- http://variogr.am/
Re: How to get number of indexed documents?
Thanks, that's what I wanted :-) PaPa On 11/2/07, Brian Whitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > does http://.../solr/admin/luke work for you? > > > 601818 > > ... > > > On Nov 1, 2007, at 10:39 PM, Papalagi Pakeha wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Is there any way to get XML version of statistics like how many > > documents are indexed etc? > > > > I have found http://.../solr/admin/properties which is cool but > > doesn't give me the number of indexed documents. > > > > Thanks > > > > PaPa > > -- > http://variogr.am/ > > > >
