Re: multiple solr home directories
I have a related question on this topic. I have a web application which I would like to create indexes for individual users on the fly, is it possible to do JNDI configuration without restarting Tomcat? Here is some more detail on what I am trying to do: Our search application has a web based administration page in which administrators can select set of documents and make them available for search on different URLs or with different user privileges. I know we could use the same index and filter results based on a indexname field, but having separate indexes would make it easy for us to migrate an index to a different machine easier. Thank you for your help. Ozgur On 8/31/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Just to make sure. you mean we can create a directory containing the shared > > jars, and each solr home/lib will symlink to the jar files in that > > directory. Right? > > correct. > > > -Hoss >
RE: performance questions
Only if you think the rest of Solr would be better written in JRuby too! > -Original Message- > From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 31 August 2007 02:57 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: performance questions > > > On Aug 30, 2007, at 6:31 PM, Mike Klaas wrote: > > Another reason why people use stored procs is to prevent multiple > > round-trips in a multi-stage query operation. This is exactly what > > complex RequestHandlers do (and the equivalent to a custom > stored proc > > would be writing your own handler). > > And we should be writing those handlers in JRuby ;) Who's with me? > > Erik > > > >
Solrsharp now supports debugQuery
Solrsharp now supports query debugging. This is enabled through the debugQuery and explainOther parameters. A DebugResults object is referenced by a SearchResults instance and provides all the debugging information that is available through these parameters, such as: - QueryString and ParsedQuery string values - Array of ExplanationRecord objects - OtherQuery value (if provided) - Array of ExplanationRecord objects supporting the OtherQuery value The ExplanationRecord object provides the details of the debug results, specifically including the ExplainInfo string (the debug analysis payload) and a reference to the UniqueRecordKey of the evaluated record. The UniqueRecordKey, though returned as a string, could then be cast appropriately to reference the matching SearchRecord referenced by the same SearchResults instance. The example program with the source code has been updated to show how to make use of these properties. If any issues are found, please log them to JIRA and associate them with the "C# client" component. cheers, jeff r.
Distribution Information?
Hello! /solr/admin/distributiondump.jsp This server is set up as a master server, and other servers use the replication scripts to pull updates from it every few minutes. My distribution information screen is blank.. and I couldn't find any information on fixing this in the wiki. Any chance someone would be able to explain how to get this page working, or what I'm doing wrong? ++ | Matthew Runo | Zappos Development | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 702-943-7833 ++
RE: Re: multiple solr home directories
You can use a combination of the Tomcat Manager app: http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/manager-howto.html and this patch: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-336 to create instances on the fly. My three types of instances have separate home directories, but each running instance uses a different data directory. Thanks, Stu -Original Message- From: Ozgur Yilmazel Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 4:48am To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: multiple solr home directories I have a related question on this topic. I have a web application which I would like to create indexes for individual users on the fly, is it possible to do JNDI configuration without restarting Tomcat? Here is some more detail on what I am trying to do: Our search application has a web based administration page in which administrators can select set of documents and make them available for search on different URLs or with different user privileges. I know we could use the same index and filter results based on a indexname field, but having separate indexes would make it easy for us to migrate an index to a different machine easier. Thank you for your help. Ozgur On 8/31/07, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > > Just to make sure. you mean we can create a directory containing the shared > > jars, and each solr home/lib will symlink to the jar files in that > > directory. Right? > > correct. > > > -Hoss >
Replication broken.. no helpful errors?
Hello! On a somewhat related note, our replication seems very much broken. I've added -v to all my cron jobs, and I think I've seen the error (below). As you can see, it's rsyncing an updated index, but then doesn't seem to know to install it. I'm not sure why though.. no errors are reported anywhere via the -v. Any help would be most appreciated, I'm sure I'm just missing something. You can see the cronjob command in the subject of the forwarded message. ++ | Matthew Runo | Zappos Development | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 702-943-7833 ++ Begin forwarded message: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon) Date: August 31, 2007 1:02:36 PM PDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /opt/solr/bin/snappuller -M search1 -P 18080 -D /opt/solr/data -S /opt/solr/logs -d /opt/solr/data -v;/ opt/solr/bin/snapinstaller -M search1 -S /opt/solr/logs -d /opt/ solr/data -v started by tomcat5 command: /opt/solr/bin/snappuller -M search1 -P 18080 -D /opt/solr/ data -S /opt/solr/logs -d /opt/solr/data -v pulling snapshot snapshot.20070831130005 receiving file list ... done deleting segments_19zm deleting _10bg.tis deleting _10bg.tii deleting _10bg.prx deleting _10bg.nrm deleting _10bg.frq deleting _10bg.fnm deleting _10bg.fdx deleting _10bg.fdt ./ _14ff.fdt _14ff.fdx _14ff.fnm _14ff.frq _14ff.nrm _14ff.prx _14ff.tii _14ff.tis _14ff_9.del _14fq.fdt _14fq.fdx _14fq.fnm _14fq.frq _14fq.nrm _14fq.prx _14fq.tii _14fq.tis _14fq_3.del _14fr.fdt _14fr.fdx _14fr.fnm _14fr.frq _14fr.nrm _14fr.prx _14fr.tii _14fr.tis _14fr_2.del _14fs.fdt _14fs.fdx _14fs.fnm _14fs.frq _14fs.nrm _14fs.prx _14fs.tii _14fs.tis _14fs_1.del segments.gen segments_1fza write.lock sent 871 bytes received 843185604 bytes 24440187.68 bytes/sec total size is 843080453 speedup is 1.00 started by tomcat5 command: /opt/solr/bin/snapinstaller -M search1 -S /opt/solr/logs - d /opt/solr/data -v latest snapshot /opt/solr/data/temp-snapshot.20070816120113 already installed
Re: Replication broken.. no helpful errors?
> latest snapshot /opt/solr/data/temp-snapshot.20070816120113 already > installed It looks like you have a directory named temp-snapshot.20070816120113 in your data directory. You should remove it. One of the other script might have left that behind somehow. I will update the snapinstaller script to ignore non-snapshot when looking for the latest snapshot to install. Bill On 8/31/07, Matthew Runo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello! > > On a somewhat related note, our replication seems very much broken. > I've added -v to all my cron jobs, and I think I've seen the error > (below). > > As you can see, it's rsyncing an updated index, but then doesn't seem > to know to install it. I'm not sure why though.. no errors are > reported anywhere via the -v. Any help would be most appreciated, I'm > sure I'm just missing something. You can see the cronjob command in > the subject of the forwarded message. > > ++ > | Matthew Runo > | Zappos Development > | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | 702-943-7833 > ++ > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon) > > Date: August 31, 2007 1:02:36 PM PDT > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Cron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /opt/solr/bin/snappuller -M search1 > > -P 18080 -D /opt/solr/data -S /opt/solr/logs -d /opt/solr/data -v;/ > > opt/solr/bin/snapinstaller -M search1 -S /opt/solr/logs -d /opt/ > > solr/data -v > > > > started by tomcat5 > > command: /opt/solr/bin/snappuller -M search1 -P 18080 -D /opt/solr/ > > data -S /opt/solr/logs -d /opt/solr/data -v > > pulling snapshot snapshot.20070831130005 > > receiving file list ... done > > deleting segments_19zm > > deleting _10bg.tis > > deleting _10bg.tii > > deleting _10bg.prx > > deleting _10bg.nrm > > deleting _10bg.frq > > deleting _10bg.fnm > > deleting _10bg.fdx > > deleting _10bg.fdt > > ./ > > _14ff.fdt > > _14ff.fdx > > _14ff.fnm > > _14ff.frq > > _14ff.nrm > > _14ff.prx > > _14ff.tii > > _14ff.tis > > _14ff_9.del > > _14fq.fdt > > _14fq.fdx > > _14fq.fnm > > _14fq.frq > > _14fq.nrm > > _14fq.prx > > _14fq.tii > > _14fq.tis > > _14fq_3.del > > _14fr.fdt > > _14fr.fdx > > _14fr.fnm > > _14fr.frq > > _14fr.nrm > > _14fr.prx > > _14fr.tii > > _14fr.tis > > _14fr_2.del > > _14fs.fdt > > _14fs.fdx > > _14fs.fnm > > _14fs.frq > > _14fs.nrm > > _14fs.prx > > _14fs.tii > > _14fs.tis > > _14fs_1.del > > segments.gen > > segments_1fza > > write.lock > > > > sent 871 bytes received 843185604 bytes 24440187.68 bytes/sec > > total size is 843080453 speedup is 1.00 > > started by tomcat5 > > command: /opt/solr/bin/snapinstaller -M search1 -S /opt/solr/logs - > > d /opt/solr/data -v > > latest snapshot /opt/solr/data/temp-snapshot.20070816120113 already > > installed > > > >
Re: Distribution Information?
Are there any error message in your appserver log files? Bill On 8/31/07, Matthew Runo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello! > > /solr/admin/distributiondump.jsp > > This server is set up as a master server, and other servers use the > replication scripts to pull updates from it every few minutes. My > distribution information screen is blank.. and I couldn't find any > information on fixing this in the wiki. > > Any chance someone would be able to explain how to get this page > working, or what I'm doing wrong? > > ++ > | Matthew Runo > | Zappos Development > | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | 702-943-7833 > ++ > > >
Re: Sort basics
Yes, when I upgraded to version 1.2 of Solr, sort works fine. Thank you for your reply and help. Yonik Seeley wrote: > > The separate sort parameter for the standard handler is relatively new > (as of Solr 1.2) > Is that the version of Solr you are using? If so, can you also supply > the output Solr gives you as the result of your query? > > -Yonik > > On 8/23/07, mel2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I am new to Solr and trying to understand how the sort functionality is >> working. Thanks in advance for your help on the following questions. >> >> I have taken the default download, started Solr and posted the mem.xml. I >> updated the mem.xml by copying each of the items and changing ONLY the id >> and price fields. The xml file is shown below. Now when I sort by price >> it >> does not seem to work. Simply shows me the documents in the order I have >> inserted. I was expecting the results that matched the term to be sorted >> by >> price despite the 'score'. >> >> 1. What am I doing wrong? >> 2. Does the 'score' overwrite any sort parameter? Or how do I get the >> list >> that match 'sdram' in name field sorted by price? >> >> >> Query: >> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=name%3A%28sdram%29&sort=price%20asc&version=2.1&start=0&rows=100&fl=name+price+score&qt=standard >> >> Results: >> >> >> − >> >> 0 >> 0 >> − >> >> price asc >> name price score >> 0 >> name:(sdram) >> standard >> 2.1 >> 100 >> >> >> − >> > maxScore="0.30217415"> >> − >> >> 0.30217415 >> − >> >> CORSAIR ValueSelect 1GB 184-Pin DDR SDRAM Unbuffered DDR 400 (PC 3200) >> System Memory - Retail >> >> 374.99 >> >> − >> >> 0.30217415 >> − >> >> A-DATA V-Series 1GB 184-Pin DDR SDRAM Unbuffered DDR 400 (PC 3200) System >> Memory - OEM >> >> >> − >> >> 0.30217415 >> − >> >> CORSAIR ValueSelect 1GB 184-Pin DDR SDRAM Unbuffered DDR 400 (PC 3200) >> System Memory - Retail >> >> 274.99 >> >> − >> >> 0.30217415 >> − >> >> A-DATA V-Series 1GB 184-Pin DDR SDRAM Unbuffered DDR 400 (PC 3200) System >> Memory - OEM >> >> >> − >> >> 0.2590064 >> − >> >> CORSAIR XMS 2GB (2 x 1GB) 184-Pin DDR SDRAM Unbuffered DDR 400 (PC 3200) >> Dual Channel Kit System Memory - Retail >> >> 3185.0 >> >> − >> >> 0.2590064 >> − >> >> CORSAIR XMS 2GB (2 x 1GB) 184-Pin DDR SDRAM Unbuffered DDR 400 (PC 3200) >> Dual Channel Kit System Memory - Retail >> >> 2185.0 >> >> >> >> >> Data file posted: >> >> >> >> >> TWINX2048-3200PRO >> CORSAIR XMS 2GB (2 x 1GB) 184-Pin DDR SDRAM >> Unbuffered >> DDR 400 (PC 3200) Dual Channel Kit System Memory - Retail >> Corsair Microsystems Inc. >> electronics >> memory >> CAS latency 2, 2-3-3-6 timing, 2.75v, >> unbuffered, >> heat-spreader >> 3185 >> 5 >> true >> >> >> >> VS1GB400C3 >> CORSAIR ValueSelect 1GB 184-Pin DDR SDRAM Unbuffered >> DDR 400 (PC 3200) System Memory - Retail >> Corsair Microsystems Inc. >> electronics >> memory >> 374.99 >> 7 >> true >> >> >> >> VDBDB1A16 >> A-DATA V-Series 1GB 184-Pin DDR SDRAM Unbuffered DDR >> 400 (PC 3200) System Memory - OEM >> A-DATA Technology Inc. >> electronics >> memory >> CAS latency 3, 2.7v >> >> 5 >> true >> >> >> >> 2TWINX2048-3200PRO >> CORSAIR XMS 2GB (2 x 1GB) 184-Pin DDR SDRAM >> Unbuffered >> DDR 400 (PC 3200) Dual Channel Kit System Memory - Retail >> 2Corsair Microsystems Inc. >> electronics >> memory >> CAS latency 2, 2-3-3-6 timing, 2.75v, >> unbuffered, >> heat-spreader >> 2185 >> 5 >> true >> >> >> >> 2VS1GB400C3 >> CORSAIR ValueSelect 1GB 184-Pin DDR SDRAM Unbuffered >> DDR 400 (PC 3200) System Memory - Retail >> 2Corsair Microsystems Inc. >> electronics >> memory >> 274.99 >> 7 >> true >> >> >> >> 2VDBDB1A16 >> A-DATA V-Series 1GB 184-Pin DDR SDRAM Unbuffered DDR >> 400 (PC 3200) System Memory - OEM >> 2A-DATA Technology Inc. >> electronics >> memory >> CAS latency 3, 2.7v >> >> 5 >> true >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Sort-basics-tf4317085.html#a12292143 >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Sort-basics-tf4317085.html#a12437380 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
