Ant build question
Hello, I would like to play with patch SOLR-69 and am trying to rebuild solr using ant with some difficulties. When I try to run ant, I get an error saying that it can't find junit, but junit is in the ant lib directory. I had a file called ant-junit.jar in the lib directory and copied it to junit.jar, but it still gave me the error. Any ideas as to what is causing this? Thanks Andrew # ant example Buildfile: build.xml checkJunitPresence: BUILD FAILED /office/src/apache-solr-nightly/build.xml:240: ## JUnit not found. Please make sure junit.jar is in ANT_HOME/lib, or made available to Ant using other mechanisms like -lib or CLASSPATH. ## Total time: 0 seconds # echo $ANT_HOME /usr/local/ant # ls /usr/local/ant/lib/ ant-antlr.jar ant-apache-oro.jar ant-commons-net.jar ant-javamail.jar ant-junit.jar ant-starteam.jar ant-vaj.jar junit.jar ant-apache-bcel.jar ant-apache-regexp.jarant-icontract.jar ant-jdepend.jar ant-launcher.jar ant-stylebook.jar ant-weblogic.jar README ant-apache-bsf.jarant-apache-resolver.jar ant-jai.jar ant-jmf.jar ant-netrexx.jar ant-swing.jar ant-xalan1.jar xercesImpl.jar ant-apache-log4j.jar ant-commons-logging.jar ant.jar ant-jsch.jar ant-nodeps.jarant-trax.jar ant-xslp.jar xml-apis.jar
limiting the rows returned for a query
Hello, I have a question that I couldn't really find the answer to and dont really know if its possible currently within solr. I want to do a simple query to the solr index. something like q=stateid:1 countryid:1 but i'm really only concerned with getting the record above and below a certain (dynamic) recordid in the search results. Is there a way to do this through a query or is my only option to return all the search results and parse them to find the record id I want, and then get the one above and below that. I'd also have to take into account pagination and whatnot which makes it also a little bit harder to do this way. anyways hope that makes sense, let me know! -Mike
Re: Ant build question
On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Andrew Nagy wrote: Hello, I would like to play with patch SOLR-69 and am trying to rebuild solr using ant with some difficulties. When I try to run ant, I get an error saying that it can't find junit, but junit is in the ant lib directory. I had a file called ant-junit.jar in the lib directory and copied it to junit.jar, but it still gave me the error. Any ideas as to what is causing this? ant-junit.jar != junit.jar rename it back, and grab junit.jar from junit.org Erik
Re: Ant build question
to clarify this a bit... ant-junit.jar is the task in Ant, but JUnit's library itself (i.e. TestCase, etc) is not there, only in junit.jar from junit.org. Erik On Apr 18, 2007, at 1:49 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote: On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Andrew Nagy wrote: Hello, I would like to play with patch SOLR-69 and am trying to rebuild solr using ant with some difficulties. When I try to run ant, I get an error saying that it can't find junit, but junit is in the ant lib directory. I had a file called ant-junit.jar in the lib directory and copied it to junit.jar, but it still gave me the error. Any ideas as to what is causing this? ant-junit.jar != junit.jar rename it back, and grab junit.jar from junit.org Erik
Re: Ant build question
Erik Hatcher wrote: ant-junit.jar != junit.jar rename it back, and grab junit.jar from junit.org Easy enough. Thanks! Andrew
RE: strange results from lucene
Thanks to all that responded! This did the trick. I used admin/analysis.jsp to determine how solr indexed my data and how solr parses my query. I used a QueryParser and applied the same filters to my query, and now my results match exactly. Thanks again! > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Bertrand Delacretaz > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 3:00 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: strange results from lucene > > On 4/17/07, Bill Tantzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ...However, when I search with 'q=ethics' in solr, I get > almost 10,000 matches. > > With my client, I get 0 > > What kind of analyzer do you use when indexing that field? If > you have a stemmer, for example, "ethics" might be indexed > without the ending "s". > > The best way to debug such problems is with the analyzer admin tool: > http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/analysis.jsp - that page > will show you how your field is processed while indexing. > > HTH, > -Bertrand >
Error when try to find_by_solr
Hi everyone,
Below is the error the I received when I tried to query the solr using
find_by_solr. below bold shows where I output the response header from the
solr server
>> Post.find_by_solr("amit")
query "(amit) AND type_t:Post"
response
"{'responseHeader'=>{'status'=>0,'QTime'=>0,'params'=>{'fl'=>'pk_i','q'=>'(amit)
AND
type_t:Post','wt'=>'ruby'}},'response'=>{'numFound'=>1,'start'=>0,'docs'=>[{'pk_i'=>ae5a8W7DOr25GRabmcoL7T}]}}"
./script/../config/../config/../vendor/plugins/acts_as_solr/lib/class_methods.rb:181:in
`process_query'
(eval):1:in `process_query'
./script/../config/../config/../vendor/plugins/acts_as_solr/lib/class_methods.rb:38:in
`eval'
./script/../config/../config/../vendor/plugins/acts_as_solr/lib/class_methods.rb:181:in
`process_query'
./script/../config/../config/../vendor/plugins/acts_as_solr/lib/class_methods.rb:38:in
`find_by_solr'
(irb):6:in `irb_binding'
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.8/irb/workspace.rb:52:in `irb_binding'
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.8/irb/workspace.rb:52
RuntimeError: There was a problem executing your search: undefined local
variable or method `ae5a8W7DOr25GRabmcoL7T' for Post:Class
from
./script/../config/../config/../vendor/plugins/acts_as_solr/lib/class_methods.rb:186:in
`process_query'
from
./script/../config/../config/../vendor/plugins/acts_as_solr/lib/class_methods.rb:38:in
`find_by_solr'
from (irb):6On Apr 12, 5:00 pm, "amit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can someone help me why is this an issue.
TIA
amit
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Error-when-try-to-find_by_solr-tf3602498.html#a10063747
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Error when try to find_by_solr
On 4/18/07, solruser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Below is the error the I received when I tried to query the solr using
find_by_solr. below bold shows where I output the response header from the
solr server
>> Post.find_by_solr("amit")
query "(amit) AND type_t:Post"
response
"{'responseHeader'=>{'status'=>0,'QTime'=>0,'params'=>{'fl'=>'pk_i','q'=>'(amit)
AND
type_t:Post','wt'=>'ruby'}},'response'=>{'numFound'=>1,'start'=>0,'docs'=>[{'pk_i'=>ae5a8W7DOr25GRabmcoL7T}]}}"
It possibly looks like you might have hit a bug in the ruby response writer?
What is the fieldType of field pk_i? Could you post the field
definition of *_i and it's corresponding fieldType?
You could also verify the problem with the following direct query (and
look for a correct value of pk_i):
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=(amit) AND
type_t:Post&wt=ruby&fl=pk_i&indent=on
-Yonik
Requests per second/minute monitor?
Is there a good spot to track request rate in Solr? Has anyone built a monitor? wunder -- Search Guru Netflix
Facet Browsing
Does anyone have any sample code (php, perl, etc) how to setup facet browsing with paging? I can't seem to get things like facet.mincount to work. Thank you. Jennifer Seaman
Re: Error when try to find_by_solr
Hi Yonik,
I verified the url that mentioned in the mail and I got the right result on
the uri.
The field type for the primary key field is string. And below is the
definition for *_i in the schema.xml file
-Amit
Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> On 4/18/07, solruser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Below is the error the I received when I tried to query the solr using
>> find_by_solr. below bold shows where I output the response header from
>> the
>> solr server
>>
>> >> Post.find_by_solr("amit")
>> query "(amit) AND type_t:Post"
>> response
>> "{'responseHeader'=>{'status'=>0,'QTime'=>0,'params'=>{'fl'=>'pk_i','q'=>'(amit)
>> AND
>> type_t:Post','wt'=>'ruby'}},'response'=>{'numFound'=>1,'start'=>0,'docs'=>[{'pk_i'=>ae5a8W7DOr25GRabmcoL7T}]}}"
>
> It possibly looks like you might have hit a bug in the ruby response
> writer?
> What is the fieldType of field pk_i? Could you post the field
> definition of *_i and it's corresponding fieldType?
>
> You could also verify the problem with the following direct query (and
> look for a correct value of pk_i):
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=(amit) AND
> type_t:Post&wt=ruby&fl=pk_i&indent=on
>
> -Yonik
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Error-when-try-to-find_by_solr-tf3602498.html#a10066458
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Requests per second/minute monitor?
Not yet from us, but I'm thinking about a nagios plugin for Solr. It would be tomcat-based for the http stuff, however. On 4/18/07, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there a good spot to track request rate in Solr? Has anyone built a monitor? wunder -- Search Guru Netflix
Re: Requests per second/minute monitor?
I noticed that admin/stats.jsp gives the total requests since startup. If the monitor keeps the previous value, it can calculate the rate at the client. wunder On 4/18/07 2:03 PM, "Jeff Rodenburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not yet from us, but I'm thinking about a nagios plugin for Solr. It would > be tomcat-based for the http stuff, however. > > On 4/18/07, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Is there a good spot to track request rate in Solr? Has anyone >> built a monitor? >> >> wunder >> -- >> Search Guru >> Netflix
Re: Error when try to find_by_solr
On 4/18/07, solruser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The root of the problem is that your "integer" field did not have an integer in it. Did you change the type of the schema after you indexed the data? If so, start over. The other possibility is that when you added the data, you put in a non integer value for pk_i. -Yonik
Re: Requests per second/minute monitor?
On 4/18/07, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I noticed that admin/stats.jsp gives the total requests since startup. If the monitor keeps the previous value, it can calculate the rate at the client. Something based off of access logs is more universal since it works across many different types of applications. -Yonik
Re: Facet Browsing
Hi Jennifer, > I can't seem to get things like facet.mincount to work. We had same issue when we used Solr incubator version. Now we are using trunk version of Solr and the issue was gone. Hope this helps, Koji
Re: Facet Browsing
On 4/18/07, Koji Sekiguchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't seem to get things like facet.mincount to work. We had same issue when we used Solr incubator version. Now we are using trunk version of Solr and the issue was gone. Hmmm, good point. The wiki is often updated at the same time as the most recent development version of Solr. -Yonik
resin faile to start with solr.
It work well when i use tomcat with solr now i wanna test resin,,,i use resin-3.1.0 now it show me [03:47:34.047] WebApp[http://localhost:8080] starting [03:47:34.691] WebApp[http://localhost:8080/resin-doc] starting [03:47:34.927] WebApp[http://localhost:8080/solr1] starting [03:47:35.051] SolrServlet.init() [03:47:35.077] Solr home set to '/usr/solrapp/solr1/' [03:47:35.077] user.dir=/tmp/resin-3.1.0/bin [03:47:35.231] Loaded SolrConfig: solrconfig.xml [03:47:35.522] adding requestHandler standard=solr.StandardRequestHandler [03:47:35.621] adding requestHandler dismax=solr.DisMaxRequestHandler [03:47:35.692] adding requestHandler partitioned=solr.DisMaxRequestHandler [03:47:35.721] adding requestHandler instock=solr.DisMaxRequestHandler [03:47:35.819] Opening new SolrCore at /usr/solrapp/solr1/, dataDir=/usr/solrapp/solr1/data [03:47:35.884] Reading Solr Schema [03:47:35.916] Schema name=example [03:47:35.929] org.apache.solr.core.SolrException: Schema Parsing Failed [03:47:35.929] at org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchema.readConfig( IndexSchema.java:441) [03:47:35.929] at org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchema.( IndexSchema.java:69) [03:47:35.929] at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.(SolrCore.java:191) -- regards jl
help need on words with special characters
Hi, I am new to solr(and 0 in lucene), my doubt is how can i protect words with special characters from tokenizing, sat for example A+, A1+ etc. because when i searched for "group A" i am getting results with A+ aswell as A1+ and so on, is there any special way to index these type of words? Thanks, Doss.
Leading wildcards
hi, we have been trying to get the leading wildcards to work. we have been looking around the Solr website, the Lucene website, wiki's and the mailing lists etc ... but we found a lot of contradictory information. so we have a few question : - is the latest version of lucene capable of handling leading wildcards ? - is the latest version of solr capable of handling leading wildcards ? - do we need to make adjustments to the solr source code ? - if we need to adjust the solr source, what do we need to change ? thanks in advance ! Maarten
