[R-pkg-devel] CartogRaflow submission

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

Hi, I've put an update version of the package cartogRaflow 1.0.4 in CRAN today. 
There are 2 errors 
Last released version's CRAN status: OK: 11, ERROR: 2
See: 


The version 1.0.3 was archived today. 
I would like to know if these errors are due to the version 1.0.3 was archived. 
If yes, is it possible to fix these errors? Thanks in advance Sylvain 
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

[R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: Suppressing long-running vignette code in CRAN submission

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

Hi, thanks to reply. I know that the version 1.0.3 of cartogRaflow use rgeos 
maptools. Now the version cartogRaflow was archived on 16th October. I've 
uploaded cartogRaflow version 1.0.4 with sf package. 
I've submitted yesterday the version 1.0.4 in CRAN and received 2 two error 
message because cartogRaflow is archived and use rgeos maptools in version 
1.0.3 
My question is : how can put the version 1.0.4 in CRAN? 
Thanks in advance Sylvain 

Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android 
 
  Le mar., oct. 17, 2023 à 10:03, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit:   
On 16 October 2023 at 10:42, Kevin R Coombes wrote:
| Produce a PDF file yourself, then use the "as.is" feature of the R.rsp 
| package.

For completeness, that approach also works directly with Sweave. Described in
a blog post by Mark van der Loo in 2019, and used in a number of packages
including a few of mine.

That said, I also used the approach described by John Harrold and cached
results myself.

Dirk

-- 
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
  

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

[R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: Re :Re: Suppressing long-running vignette code in CRAN submission

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

You will find the full R CMD check that I received 
Status: 2 NOTEs
Debian: 
<https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_1.0.4_20231016_225129/Debian/00check.log>


Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android 
 
  Le mar., oct. 17, 2023 à 11:49, Ivan Krylov a écrit:   
Dear Sylvain,

В Tue, 17 Oct 2023 09:45:25 + (UTC)
"cartograf...@gmail.com"  пишет:

> I've uploaded cartogRaflow version 1.0.4 with sf package. 
> I've submitted yesterday the version 1.0.4 in CRAN and received 2 two
> error message because cartogRaflow is archived and use rgeos maptools
> in version 1.0.3 

Could you please show us the full R CMD check report e-mailed to you in
response to the CRAN submission?

A NOTE saying that the previous version had been archived is to be
expected. If it's all your package got, it will be manually reviewed
later and published.

-- 
Best regards,
Ivan
  

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

[R-pkg-devel] package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

Hello, 
I've submitted my package cartograflow and I received an email from your teeam 
that it does not pass the incoming checks automatically.Debian: 

Status: 1 ERROR, 2 WARNINGs, 1 NOTE

So, I've made the new check on my plateform (linux ubuntu) and the check is 
OK.I used : ==> devtools::check(args = c('--no-manual','--as-cran'))Status is : 
── R CMD check results  cartograflow 0.0.0.9000 
Duration: 54.6s
0 errors ✔ | 0 warnings ✔ | 0 notes ✔
R CMD check succeeded
Can you  help me to fix the problem? 
Thanks in advance to your replySylvain
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

[R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

Hi,  l've made R CMD check --as-cran on rstudio 3.5.2Why I have to use r-devel?
I confirm that I didn't received à error message when I've made 
dev_tool::check. 
How can I solve my problem ?
Thanks in advance Sylvain 


nvoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android 
 
  Le lun., mars 25, 2019 à 23:38, Uwe Ligges a 
écrit :   I cannot beloeve it. But this is certainly not R-devel?

Not sure about devtools which we do not use on CRAN, but simply

R CMD check --as-cran

with a recent R-devel  version on the package tarball should reproduce 
the findings.

Best,
Uwe Ligges


On 25.03.2019 23:12, cartograf...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
> I've submitted my package cartograflow and I received an email from your 
> teeam that it does not pass the incoming checks automatically.Debian: 
> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Debian/00check.log>
> Status: 1 ERROR, 2 WARNINGs, 1 NOTE
> 
> So, I've made the new check on my plateform (linux ubuntu) and the check is 
> OK.I used : ==> devtools::check(args = c('--no-manual','--as-cran'))Status is 
> :
> ── R CMD check results  cartograflow 0.0.0.9000 
> 
> Duration: 54.6s
> 0 errors ✔ | 0 warnings ✔ | 0 notes ✔
> R CMD check succeeded
> Can you  help me to fix the problem?
> Thanks in advance to your replySylvain
>     [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> 
> __
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> 
  

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

[R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: Re :Re: package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

Hi, thanks to your propositions and I will take into account.I make 
dev_tools::check directly in rstudio.
I would like to know if I can do R CMD directly in R interface with the command 
: #bash R-devel CMD check --as-cran cartograflow.tar.gzIt will be better 
Thanks Sylvain 

Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android 
 
  Le mar., mars 26, 2019 à 22:42, Henrik Bengtsson 
a écrit :   FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the following NOTEs
with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran:

* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ‘cartogRaflow ’

New submission

Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000)

Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
  flowmapping (7:41)

Author field should be Authors@R.  Current value is:
  c(person("Françoise", "Bahoken", email =
"francoise.baho...@ifsttar.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
            person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
"blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr", role = c("aut"))

The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:
‘thematic cartography of flows and movements’
In title case that is:
‘Thematic Cartography of Flows and Movements’

Those are all classical mistakes ("we've all been there").  The
vignette errors may or may not be specific to R devel.

/Henrik

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:29 PM cartograf...@gmail.com
 wrote:
>
> Hi,  l've made R CMD check --as-cran on rstudio 3.5.2Why I have to use 
> r-devel?
> I confirm that I didn't received à error message when I've made 
> dev_tool::check.
> How can I solve my problem ?
> Thanks in advance Sylvain
>
>
> nvoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
>
>  Le lun., mars 25, 2019 à 23:38, Uwe Ligges 
>a écrit :  I cannot beloeve it. But this is certainly not R-devel?
>
> Not sure about devtools which we do not use on CRAN, but simply
>
> R CMD check --as-cran
>
> with a recent R-devel  version on the package tarball should reproduce
> the findings.
>
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
>
> On 25.03.2019 23:12, cartograf...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I've submitted my package cartograflow and I received an email from your 
> > teeam that it does not pass the incoming checks automatically.Debian: 
> > <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Debian/00check.log>
> > Status: 1 ERROR, 2 WARNINGs, 1 NOTE
> >
> > So, I've made the new check on my plateform (linux ubuntu) and the check is 
> > OK.I used : ==> devtools::check(args = c('--no-manual','--as-cran'))Status 
> > is :
> > ── R CMD check results  cartograflow 0.0.0.9000 
> > 
> > Duration: 54.6s
> > 0 errors ✔ | 0 warnings ✔ | 0 notes ✔
> > R CMD check succeeded
> > Can you  help me to fix the problem?
> > Thanks in advance to your replySylvain
> >    [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > __
> > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> >
>
>
>        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> __
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel  

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

 Hi, 

I come back to you  because I have always the problem with devtools::check of 
my package. 

I used the command to check my package with R-devel : 
sylvain@sylvain:~/svn$ bash R-devel.sh CMD check --as-cran 
/home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz

When I start the rmd file there is a warning due to package dplyr : 
Attaching package: 'dplyr'
The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
    filter, lag
The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
    intersect, setdiff, setequal, union

The solve this issue I added in rmd file, description file and the namespace 
the package conflicted. 
So, the package conflicted avoid to have this warning. 

But when I run R-devel CMD check I have a new issue that is Error in 
loadNamespace...no package called ‘conflicted’ (see below)

Can you help me to solve this issue if tit's possible? 
Thanks in advance to your help ! 
Sylvain
-
Below extract of 00check.log 
* checking whether package ‘cartograflow’ can be installed ... ERROR
Installation failed.
See ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/00install.out’ for details.
* DONE
Status: 1 ERROR, 1 NOTE

Below 00install.out 
* installing *source* package ‘cartograflow’ ...
** using staged installation
** R
** inst
** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading
Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = vI[[i]]) : 
  there is no package called ‘conflicted’
Calls:  ... loadNamespace -> withRestarts -> withOneRestart -> 
doWithOneRestart
Exécution arrêtée
ERROR: lazy loading failed for package ‘cartograflow’
* removing ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/cartograflow’







Le mardi 26 mars 2019 à 22:42:21 UTC+1, Henrik Bengtsson 
 a écrit :  
 
 FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the following NOTEs
with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran:

* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ‘cartogRaflow ’

New submission

Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000)

Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
  flowmapping (7:41)

Author field should be Authors@R.  Current value is:
  c(person("Françoise", "Bahoken", email =
"francoise.baho...@ifsttar.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
            person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
"blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr", role = c("aut"))

The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:
‘thematic cartography of flows and movements’
In title case that is:
‘Thematic Cartography of Flows and Movements’

Those are all classical mistakes ("we've all been there").  The
vignette errors may or may not be specific to R devel.

/Henrik

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:29 PM cartograf...@gmail.com
 wrote:
>
> Hi,  l've made R CMD check --as-cran on rstudio 3.5.2Why I have to use 
> r-devel?
> I confirm that I didn't received à error message when I've made 
> dev_tool::check.
> How can I solve my problem ?
> Thanks in advance Sylvain
>
>
> nvoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
>
>  Le lun., mars 25, 2019 à 23:38, Uwe Ligges 
>a écrit :  I cannot beloeve it. But this is certainly not R-devel?
>
> Not sure about devtools which we do not use on CRAN, but simply
>
> R CMD check --as-cran
>
> with a recent R-devel  version on the package tarball should reproduce
> the findings.
>
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
>
> On 25.03.2019 23:12, cartograf...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I've submitted my package cartograflow and I received an email from your 
> > teeam that it does not pass the incoming checks automatically.Debian: 
> > <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Debian/00check.log>
> > Status: 1 ERROR, 2 WARNINGs, 1 NOTE
> >
> > So, I've made the new check on my plateform (linux ubuntu) and the check is 
> > OK.I used : ==> devtools::check(args = c('--no-manual','--as-cran'))Status 
> > is :
> > ── R CMD check results  cartograflow 0.0.0.9000 
> > 
> > Duration: 54.6s
> > 0 errors ✔ | 0 warnings ✔ | 0 notes ✔
> > R CMD check succeeded
> > Can you  help me to fix the problem?
> > Thanks in advance to your replySylvain
> >    [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > __
> > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> >
>
>
>        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> __
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel  
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

 Yes!

Le mercredi 3 avril 2019 à 20:21:59 UTC+2, Ben Bolker  a 
écrit :  
 
 
 Have you installed the 'conflicted' package on your local machine
(i.e., the machine you're running the checks on)?

On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com wrote:
>  Hi, 
> 
> I come back to you  because I have always the problem with devtools::check of 
> my package. 
> 
> I used the command to check my package with R-devel : 
> sylvain@sylvain:~/svn$ bash R-devel.sh CMD check --as-cran 
> /home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz
> 
> When I start the rmd file there is a warning due to package dplyr : 
> Attaching package: 'dplyr'
> The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
>     filter, lag
> The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
>     intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
> 
> The solve this issue I added in rmd file, description file and the namespace 
> the package conflicted. 
> So, the package conflicted avoid to have this warning. 
> 
> But when I run R-devel CMD check I have a new issue that is Error in 
> loadNamespace...no package called ‘conflicted’ (see below)
> 
> Can you help me to solve this issue if tit's possible? 
> Thanks in advance to your help ! 
> Sylvain
> -
> Below extract of 00check.log 
> * checking whether package ‘cartograflow’ can be installed ... ERROR
> Installation failed.
> See ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/00install.out’ for details.
> * DONE
> Status: 1 ERROR, 1 NOTE
> 
> Below 00install.out 
> * installing *source* package ‘cartograflow’ ...
> ** using staged installation
> ** R
> ** inst
> ** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading
> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = vI[[i]]) : 
>   there is no package called ‘conflicted’
> Calls:  ... loadNamespace -> withRestarts -> withOneRestart -> 
> doWithOneRestart
> Exécution arrêtée
> ERROR: lazy loading failed for package ‘cartograflow’
> * removing ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/cartograflow’
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>    Le mardi 26 mars 2019 à 22:42:21 UTC+1, Henrik Bengtsson 
> a écrit :  
>  
>  FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the following NOTEs
> with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran:
> 
> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
> Maintainer: ‘cartogRaflow ’
> 
> New submission
> 
> Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000)
> 
> Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
>   flowmapping (7:41)
> 
> Author field should be Authors@R.  Current value is:
>   c(person("Françoise", "Bahoken", email =
> "francoise.baho...@ifsttar.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
>             person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
> "blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr", role = c("aut"))
> 
> The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:
> ‘thematic cartography of flows and movements’
> In title case that is:
> ‘Thematic Cartography of Flows and Movements’
> 
> Those are all classical mistakes ("we've all been there").  The
> vignette errors may or may not be specific to R devel.
> 
> /Henrik
> 
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:29 PM cartograf...@gmail.com
>  wrote:
>>
>> Hi,  l've made R CMD check --as-cran on rstudio 3.5.2Why I have to use 
>> r-devel?
>> I confirm that I didn't received à error message when I've made 
>> dev_tool::check.
>> How can I solve my problem ?
>> Thanks in advance Sylvain
>>
>>
>> nvoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
>>
>>   Le lun., mars 25, 2019 à 23:38, Uwe 
>> Ligges a écrit :  I cannot beloeve it. But 
>> this is certainly not R-devel?
>>
>> Not sure about devtools which we do not use on CRAN, but simply
>>
>> R CMD check --as-cran
>>
>> with a recent R-devel  version on the package tarball should reproduce
>> the findings.
>>
>> Best,
>> Uwe Ligges
>>
>>
>> On 25.03.2019 23:12, cartograf...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> I've submitted my package cartograflow and I received an email from your 
>>> teeam that it does not pass the incoming checks automatically.Debian: 
>>> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Debian/00check.log>
>>> Status: 1 ERROR, 2 WARNINGs, 1 NOTE
>>>
>>> So, I've made the new check on my plateform (linux ubuntu) and the check is 
>>> OK.I used : ==&

[R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

Hi,I don't know if my explanations are clear.I tried several way to solve this 
problem w/o success. Someone have an idea ?Thanks in advance 

On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com wrote:
>  Hi, 
> 
> I come back to you  because I have always the problem with devtools::check of 
> my package. 
> 
> I used the command to check my package with R-devel : 
> sylvain@sylvain:~/svn$ bash R-devel.sh CMD check --as-cran 
> /home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz
> 
> When I start the rmd file there is a warning due to package dplyr : 
> Attaching package: 'dplyr'
> The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
>     filter, lag
> The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
>     intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
> 
> The solve this issue I added in rmd file, description file and the namespace 
> the package conflicted. 
> So, the package conflicted avoid to have this warning. 
> 
> But when I run R-devel CMD check I have a new issue that is Error in 
> loadNamespace...no package called ‘conflicted’ (see below)
> 
> Can you help me to solve this issue if tit's possible? 
> Thanks in advance to your help ! 
> Sylvain
> -
> Below extract of 00check.log 
> * checking whether package ‘cartograflow’ can be installed ... ERROR
> Installation failed.
> See ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/00install.out’ for details.
> * DONE
> Status: 1 ERROR, 1 NOTE
> 
> Below 00install.out 
> * installing *source* package ‘cartograflow’ ...
> ** using staged installation
> ** R
> ** inst
> ** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading
> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = vI[[i]]) : 
>   there is no package called ‘conflicted’
> Calls:  ... loadNamespace -> withRestarts -> withOneRestart -> 
> doWithOneRestart
> Exécution arrêtée
> ERROR: lazy loading failed for package ‘cartograflow’
> * removing ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/cartograflow’
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>    Le mardi 26 mars 2019 à 22:42:21 UTC+1, Henrik Bengtsson 
> a écrit :  
>  
>  FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the following NOTEs
> with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran:
> 
> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
> Maintainer: ‘cartogRaflow ’
> 
> New submission
> 
> Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000)
> 
> Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
>   flowmapping (7:41)
> 
> Author field should be Authors@R.  Current value is:
>   c(person("Françoise", "Bahoken", email =
> "francoise.baho...@ifsttar.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
>             person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
> "blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr", role = c("aut"))
> 
> The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:
> ‘thematic cartography of flows and movements’
> In title case that is:
> ‘Thematic Cartography of Flows and Movements’
> 
> Those are all classical mistakes ("we've all been there").  The
> vignette errors may or may not be specific to R devel.
> 
> /Henrik
> 
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:29 PM cartograf...@gmail.com
>  wrote:
>>
>> Hi,  l've made R CMD check --as-cran on rstudio 3.5.2Why I have to use 
>> r-devel?
>> I confirm that I didn't received à error message when I've made 
>> dev_tool::check.
>> How can I solve my problem ?
>> Thanks in advance Sylvain
>>
>>
>> nvoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
>>
>>   Le lun., mars 25, 2019 à 23:38, Uwe 
>> Ligges a écrit :  I cannot beloeve it. But 
>> this is certainly not R-devel?
>>
>> Not sure about devtools which we do not use on CRAN, but simply
>>
>> R CMD check --as-cran
>>
>> with a recent R-devel  version on the package tarball should reproduce
>> the findings.
>>
>> Best,
>> Uwe Ligges
>>
>>
>> On 25.03.2019 23:12, cartograf...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> I've submitted my package cartograflow and I received an email from your 
>>> teeam that it does not pass the incoming checks automatically.Debian: 
>>> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Debian/00check.log>
>>> Status: 1 ERROR, 2 WARNINGs, 1 NOTE
>>>
>>> So, I've made the new check on my plateform (linux ubuntu) and the check is 
>>> OK.I used : ==> devtools::check(args = c('--no-manual','--as-cra

[R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

First of all, I used the conflicted package because there had a problem with 
the package dplyr: Attaching package dplyr Vs stats. 
Maybe I've to put the conflicted package in line depends of the description 
file. 
Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android 
 
  Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 à 8:01, David Hugh-Jones a 
écrit :   Is “conflicted” in your DESCRIPTION file? Btw, can we see the package 
source somewhere?
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 19:24, cartograf...@gmail.com  
wrote:

 Yes!

    Le mercredi 3 avril 2019 à 20:21:59 UTC+2, Ben Bolker  a 
écrit :  


 Have you installed the 'conflicted' package on your local machine
(i.e., the machine you're running the checks on)?

On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com wrote:
>  Hi, 
> 
> I come back to you  because I have always the problem with devtools::check of 
> my package. 
> 
> I used the command to check my package with R-devel : 
> sylvain@sylvain:~/svn$ bash R-devel.sh CMD check --as-cran 
> /home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz
> 
> When I start the rmd file there is a warning due to package dplyr : 
> Attaching package: 'dplyr'
> The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
>     filter, lag
> The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
>     intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
> 
> The solve this issue I added in rmd file, description file and the namespace 
> the package conflicted. 
> So, the package conflicted avoid to have this warning. 
> 
> But when I run R-devel CMD check I have a new issue that is Error in 
> loadNamespace...no package called ‘conflicted’ (see below)
> 
> Can you help me to solve this issue if tit's possible? 
> Thanks in advance to your help ! 
> Sylvain
> -
> Below extract of 00check.log 
> * checking whether package ‘cartograflow’ can be installed ... ERROR
> Installation failed.
> See ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/00install.out’ for details.
> * DONE
> Status: 1 ERROR, 1 NOTE
> 
> Below 00install.out 
> * installing *source* package ‘cartograflow’ ...
> ** using staged installation
> ** R
> ** inst
> ** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading
> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = vI[[i]]) : 
>   there is no package called ‘conflicted’
> Calls:  ... loadNamespace -> withRestarts -> withOneRestart -> 
> doWithOneRestart
> Exécution arrêtée
> ERROR: lazy loading failed for package ‘cartograflow’
> * removing ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/cartograflow’
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>    Le mardi 26 mars 2019 à 22:42:21 UTC+1, Henrik Bengtsson 
> a écrit :  
>  
>  FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the following NOTEs
> with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran:
> 
> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
> Maintainer: ‘cartogRaflow ’
> 
> New submission
> 
> Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000)
> 
> Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
>   flowmapping (7:41)
> 
> Author field should be Authors@R.  Current value is:
>   c(person("Françoise", "Bahoken", email =
> "francoise.baho...@ifsttar.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
>             person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
> "blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr", role = c("aut"))
> 
> The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:
> ‘thematic cartography of flows and movements’
> In title case that is:
> ‘Thematic Cartography of Flows and Movements’
> 
> Those are all classical mistakes ("we've all been there").  The
> vignette errors may or may not be specific to R devel.
> 
> /Henrik
> 
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:29 PM cartograf...@gmail.com
>  wrote:
>>
>> Hi,  l've made R CMD check --as-cran on rstudio 3.5.2Why I have to use 
>> r-devel?
>> I confirm that I didn't received à error message when I've made 
>> dev_tool::check.
>> How can I solve my problem ?
>> Thanks in advance Sylvain
>>
>>
>> nvoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
>>
>>   Le lun., mars 25, 2019 à 23:38, Uwe 
>> Ligges a écrit :  I cannot beloeve it. But 
>> this is certainly not R-devel?
>>
>> Not sure about devtools which we do not use on CRAN, but simply
>>
>> R CMD check --as-cran
>>
>> with a recent R-devel  version on the package tarball should reproduce
>> the findings.
>>
>> Best,
>> Uwe Ligges
>>
>>
>> On 25.03.2019 23:12, cartograf...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> I'v

[R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: Re :Re: package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

Thanks to your reply. I've made the modification for week ago. As you can see 
when I submitted I was 1 ERROR 2WARNINGs 1NOTE 
After that I take into account some correction that one person proposed. I've 
made R-devel check and I've now 1 ERROR 1NOTE 
Right now I 'm in platform linux.
Have you an idea to solve  Warning in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : NAs 
introduced by coercion.

I will check the other point 

Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android 
 
  Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 à 8:22, Sebastian Meyer a écrit :   
Note that output concerning masked objects are just messages which do
not cause your vignette to fail. So it is not stricly necessary to start
working on these conflicts now.

However, looking closely at the win-builder check results
(https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Windows/00check.log),
I see the following output below these messages

> Warning in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : NAs introduced by coercion
> Quitting from lines 529-573 (cartograflow.Rmd) 
> Error: processing vignette 'cartograflow.Rmd' failed with diagnostics:
> argument is of length zero

So the problem actually is in lines 529-573 of the cartograflow.Rmd
vignette (at least in the version submitted to win-builder a few weeks ago).

Running tools::buildVignette("cartograflow.Rmd") locally, I see

> Error in if (horiz) { : argument is of length zero

and the subsequent traceback() shows that the error originates from

> layoutLayer(title = "Professional mobility in Greater Paris", 
>        coltitle = "black", author = "Cartograflow, 2019", sources = "Sources 
>: data : INSEE, RP, MOBPRO, 2017 ; basemap : IGN, APUR, UMS 2414 RIATE, 
>2018.", 
>        scale = 0.2, tabtitle = TRUE, frame = TRUE, north(pos = "topright"), 
>        col = "grey")

So it seems to me that the unnamed argument 'north(pos = "topright")' is
wrongly matched to the "horiz" argument of layoutLayer().

Cheers,

    Sebastian


Am 04.04.19 um 07:20 schrieb cartograf...@gmail.com:
> 
> Hi,I don't know if my explanations are clear.I tried several way to solve 
> this problem w/o success. Someone have an idea ?Thanks in advance 
> 
> On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com wrote:
>>   Hi, 
>>
>> I come back to you  because I have always the problem with devtools::check 
>> of my package. 
>>
>> I used the command to check my package with R-devel : 
>> sylvain@sylvain:~/svn$ bash R-devel.sh CMD check --as-cran 
>> /home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz
>>
>> When I start the rmd file there is a warning due to package dplyr : 
>> Attaching package: 'dplyr'
>> The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
>>     filter, lag
>> The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
>>     intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
>>
>> The solve this issue I added in rmd file, description file and the namespace 
>> the package conflicted. 
>> So, the package conflicted avoid to have this warning. 
>>
>> But when I run R-devel CMD check I have a new issue that is Error in 
>> loadNamespace...no package called ‘conflicted’ (see below)
>>
>> Can you help me to solve this issue if tit's possible? 
>> Thanks in advance to your help ! 
>> Sylvain
>> -
>> Below extract of 00check.log 
>> * checking whether package ‘cartograflow’ can be installed ... ERROR
>> Installation failed.
>> See ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/00install.out’ for details.
>> * DONE
>> Status: 1 ERROR, 1 NOTE
>>
>> Below 00install.out 
>> * installing *source* package ‘cartograflow’ ...
>> ** using staged installation
>> ** R
>> ** inst
>> ** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading
>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = vI[[i]]) : 
>>   there is no package called ‘conflicted’
>> Calls:  ... loadNamespace -> withRestarts -> withOneRestart -> 
>> doWithOneRestart
>> Exécution arrêtée
>> ERROR: lazy loading failed for package ‘cartograflow’
>> * removing ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/cartograflow’
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     Le mardi 26 mars 2019 à 22:42:21 UTC+1, Henrik Bengtsson 
>>  a écrit :  
>>   
>>   FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the following NOTEs
>> with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran:
>>
>> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
>> Maintainer: ‘cartogRa

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

 I follow up your recommendation and for the moment I didn't used "conflicted". 

So, I've made the nex R CMD check and I have the problem 
Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = vI[[i]]) : 
  there is no package called ‘dplyr’
How I can  solve this issue? 

Thanks in advance

Le jeudi 4 avril 2019 à 08:22:26 UTC+2, Sebastian Meyer  
a écrit :  
 
 Note that output concerning masked objects are just messages which do
not cause your vignette to fail. So it is not stricly necessary to start
working on these conflicts now.

However, looking closely at the win-builder check results
(https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Windows/00check.log),
I see the following output below these messages

> Warning in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : NAs introduced by coercion
> Quitting from lines 529-573 (cartograflow.Rmd) 
> Error: processing vignette 'cartograflow.Rmd' failed with diagnostics:
> argument is of length zero

So the problem actually is in lines 529-573 of the cartograflow.Rmd
vignette (at least in the version submitted to win-builder a few weeks ago).

Running tools::buildVignette("cartograflow.Rmd") locally, I see

> Error in if (horiz) { : argument is of length zero

and the subsequent traceback() shows that the error originates from

> layoutLayer(title = "Professional mobility in Greater Paris", 
>        coltitle = "black", author = "Cartograflow, 2019", sources = "Sources 
>: data : INSEE, RP, MOBPRO, 2017 ; basemap : IGN, APUR, UMS 2414 RIATE, 
>2018.", 
>        scale = 0.2, tabtitle = TRUE, frame = TRUE, north(pos = "topright"), 
>        col = "grey")

So it seems to me that the unnamed argument 'north(pos = "topright")' is
wrongly matched to the "horiz" argument of layoutLayer().

Cheers,

    Sebastian


Am 04.04.19 um 07:20 schrieb cartograf...@gmail.com:
> 
> Hi,I don't know if my explanations are clear.I tried several way to solve 
> this problem w/o success. Someone have an idea ?Thanks in advance 
> 
> On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com wrote:
>>   Hi, 
>>
>> I come back to you  because I have always the problem with devtools::check 
>> of my package. 
>>
>> I used the command to check my package with R-devel : 
>> sylvain@sylvain:~/svn$ bash R-devel.sh CMD check --as-cran 
>> /home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz
>>
>> When I start the rmd file there is a warning due to package dplyr : 
>> Attaching package: 'dplyr'
>> The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
>>     filter, lag
>> The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
>>     intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
>>
>> The solve this issue I added in rmd file, description file and the namespace 
>> the package conflicted. 
>> So, the package conflicted avoid to have this warning. 
>>
>> But when I run R-devel CMD check I have a new issue that is Error in 
>> loadNamespace...no package called ‘conflicted’ (see below)
>>
>> Can you help me to solve this issue if tit's possible? 
>> Thanks in advance to your help ! 
>> Sylvain
>> -
>> Below extract of 00check.log 
>> * checking whether package ‘cartograflow’ can be installed ... ERROR
>> Installation failed.
>> See ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/00install.out’ for details.
>> * DONE
>> Status: 1 ERROR, 1 NOTE
>>
>> Below 00install.out 
>> * installing *source* package ‘cartograflow’ ...
>> ** using staged installation
>> ** R
>> ** inst
>> ** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading
>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = vI[[i]]) : 
>>   there is no package called ‘conflicted’
>> Calls:  ... loadNamespace -> withRestarts -> withOneRestart -> 
>> doWithOneRestart
>> Exécution arrêtée
>> ERROR: lazy loading failed for package ‘cartograflow’
>> * removing ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/cartograflow’
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     Le mardi 26 mars 2019 à 22:42:21 UTC+1, Henrik Bengtsson 
>>  a écrit :  
>>   
>>   FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the following NOTEs
>> with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran:
>>
>> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
>> Maintainer: ‘cartogRaflow ’
>>
>> New submission
>>
>> Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000)
>>
>> Possibly 

[R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: Re :Re: package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

How I can declare the dependencies in DESCRIPTION file?
 depends: library(dplyr,dependencies =TRUE)
Thanks 
Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android 
 
  Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 à 14:42, Uwe Ligges a 
écrit :    or forgot to declare a dependency on that package in the 
DESCRIPTION file...

Best,
Uwe Ligges

On 04.04.2019 13:34, Sebastian Meyer wrote:
> There are probably no clairvoyants around here. So, again, without
> access to the up-to-date source code of your package, nobody will be
> able to help.
> 
> "there is no package called ..." means that the given package is not
> installed in any of the libraries currently in use by R (see .libPaths()
> for the relevant paths). Maybe you have installed "dplyr" in a library
> used by your standard R installation, but not in any library used by
> your R-devel installation (which you seem to use for checking the
> package)? Just a wild guess.
> 
> 
> Am 04.04.19 um 13:14 schrieb cartograf...@gmail.com:
>> I follow up your recommendation and for the moment I didn't used
>> "conflicted".
>>
>> So, I've made the nex R CMD check and I have the problem
>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck =
>> vI[[i]]) :
>>    there is no package called ‘dplyr’
>>
>> How I can  solve this issue?
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Le jeudi 4 avril 2019 à 08:22:26 UTC+2, Sebastian Meyer
>>  a écrit :
>>
>>
>> Note that output concerning masked objects are just messages which do
>> not cause your vignette to fail. So it is not stricly necessary to start
>> working on these conflicts now.
>>
>> However, looking closely at the win-builder check results
>> (https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Windows/00check.log),
>> I see the following output below these messages
>>
>>> Warning in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : NAs introduced by coercion
>>> Quitting from lines 529-573 (cartograflow.Rmd)
>>> Error: processing vignette 'cartograflow.Rmd' failed with diagnostics:
>>> argument is of length zero
>>
>> So the problem actually is in lines 529-573 of the cartograflow.Rmd
>> vignette (at least in the version submitted to win-builder a few weeks ago).
>>
>> Running tools::buildVignette("cartograflow.Rmd") locally, I see
>>
>>> Error in if (horiz) { : argument is of length zero
>>
>> and the subsequent traceback() shows that the error originates from
>>
>>> layoutLayer(title = "Professional mobility in Greater Paris",
>>>          coltitle = "black", author = "Cartograflow, 2019", sources =
>> "Sources : data : INSEE, RP, MOBPRO, 2017 ; basemap : IGN, APUR, UMS
>> 2414 RIATE, 2018.",
>>>          scale = 0.2, tabtitle = TRUE, frame = TRUE, north(pos =
>> "topright"),
>>>          col = "grey")
>>
>> So it seems to me that the unnamed argument 'north(pos = "topright")' is
>> wrongly matched to the "horiz" argument of layoutLayer().
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>      Sebastian
>>
>>
>> Am 04.04.19 um 07:20 schrieb cartograf...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Hi,I don't know if my explanations are clear.I tried several way to
>> solve this problem w/o success. Someone have an idea ?Thanks in advance
>>>
>>> On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>    Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I come back to you  because I have always the problem with
>> devtools::check of my package.
>>>>
>>>> I used the command to check my package with R-devel :
>>>> sylvain@sylvain <mailto:sylvain@sylvain>:~/svn$ bash R-devel.sh CMD
>> check --as-cran
>> /home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz
>>>>
>>>> When I start the rmd file there is a warning due to package dplyr :
>>>>  Attaching package: 'dplyr'
>>>>  The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
>>>>      filter, lag
>>>>  The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
>>>>      intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
>>>>
>>>> The solve this issue I added in rmd file, description file and the
>> namespace the package conflicted.
>>>> So, the package conflicted avoid to have this warning.
>

[R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: Re :Re: package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

I've put dplyr in import item of description file 

Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android 
 
  Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 à 17:04, cartograf...@gmail.com 
a écrit :   How I can declare the dependencies in DESCRIPTION file?
 depends: library(dplyr,dependencies =TRUE)
Thanks 
Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android 
 
  Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 à 14:42, Uwe Ligges a 
écrit :    or forgot to declare a dependency on that package in the 
DESCRIPTION file...

Best,
Uwe Ligges

On 04.04.2019 13:34, Sebastian Meyer wrote:
> There are probably no clairvoyants around here. So, again, without
> access to the up-to-date source code of your package, nobody will be
> able to help.
> 
> "there is no package called ..." means that the given package is not
> installed in any of the libraries currently in use by R (see .libPaths()
> for the relevant paths). Maybe you have installed "dplyr" in a library
> used by your standard R installation, but not in any library used by
> your R-devel installation (which you seem to use for checking the
> package)? Just a wild guess.
> 
> 
> Am 04.04.19 um 13:14 schrieb cartograf...@gmail.com:
>> I follow up your recommendation and for the moment I didn't used
>> "conflicted".
>>
>> So, I've made the nex R CMD check and I have the problem
>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck =
>> vI[[i]]) :
>>    there is no package called ‘dplyr’
>>
>> How I can  solve this issue?
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Le jeudi 4 avril 2019 à 08:22:26 UTC+2, Sebastian Meyer
>>  a écrit :
>>
>>
>> Note that output concerning masked objects are just messages which do
>> not cause your vignette to fail. So it is not stricly necessary to start
>> working on these conflicts now.
>>
>> However, looking closely at the win-builder check results
>> (https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Windows/00check.log),
>> I see the following output below these messages
>>
>>> Warning in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : NAs introduced by coercion
>>> Quitting from lines 529-573 (cartograflow.Rmd)
>>> Error: processing vignette 'cartograflow.Rmd' failed with diagnostics:
>>> argument is of length zero
>>
>> So the problem actually is in lines 529-573 of the cartograflow.Rmd
>> vignette (at least in the version submitted to win-builder a few weeks ago).
>>
>> Running tools::buildVignette("cartograflow.Rmd") locally, I see
>>
>>> Error in if (horiz) { : argument is of length zero
>>
>> and the subsequent traceback() shows that the error originates from
>>
>>> layoutLayer(title = "Professional mobility in Greater Paris",
>>>          coltitle = "black", author = "Cartograflow, 2019", sources =
>> "Sources : data : INSEE, RP, MOBPRO, 2017 ; basemap : IGN, APUR, UMS
>> 2414 RIATE, 2018.",
>>>          scale = 0.2, tabtitle = TRUE, frame = TRUE, north(pos =
>> "topright"),
>>>          col = "grey")
>>
>> So it seems to me that the unnamed argument 'north(pos = "topright")' is
>> wrongly matched to the "horiz" argument of layoutLayer().
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>      Sebastian
>>
>>
>> Am 04.04.19 um 07:20 schrieb cartograf...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Hi,I don't know if my explanations are clear.I tried several way to
>> solve this problem w/o success. Someone have an idea ?Thanks in advance
>>>
>>> On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>    Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I come back to you  because I have always the problem with
>> devtools::check of my package.
>>>>
>>>> I used the command to check my package with R-devel :
>>>> sylvain@sylvain <mailto:sylvain@sylvain>:~/svn$ bash R-devel.sh CMD
>> check --as-cran
>> /home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz
>>>>
>>>> When I start the rmd file there is a warning due to package dplyr :
>>>>  Attaching package: 'dplyr'
>>>>  The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
>>>>      filter, lag
>>>>  The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
>>>>      intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
>>>>
>>>> The solve this issue I a

[R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: Re :Re: Re :Re: package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

Hi,Thanks to your reply and your information. Right now it stays only one note 
when I've made R-devel CMD CHECK --as-cran. So, I didn't identified this note 
in repertory R.check. What's file I've to check?I'd like to know if I can new 
submission in CRAN with one note. Sylvain 



Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android 
 
  Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 à 17:09, Maëlle SALMON a écrit 
:I'd recommend reading https://r-pkgs.org/description.html#dependencies 
(and the rest of the book is very good as well), it'll help you understand why 
and how to declare dependencies.




Den torsdag 4 april 2019 17:05:02 CEST, cartograf...@gmail.com 
 skrev:  
 
 How I can declare the dependencies in DESCRIPTION file?
 depends: library(dplyr,dependencies =TRUE)
Thanks 
Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android 
 
  Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 à 14:42, Uwe Ligges a 
écrit :   or forgot to declare a dependency on that package in the 
DESCRIPTION file...

Best,
Uwe Ligges

On 04.04.2019 13:34, Sebastian Meyer wrote:
> There are probably no clairvoyants around here. So, again, without
> access to the up-to-date source code of your package, nobody will be
> able to help.
> 
> "there is no package called ..." means that the given package is not
> installed in any of the libraries currently in use by R (see .libPaths()
> for the relevant paths). Maybe you have installed "dplyr" in a library
> used by your standard R installation, but not in any library used by
> your R-devel installation (which you seem to use for checking the
> package)? Just a wild guess.
> 
> 
> Am 04.04.19 um 13:14 schrieb cartograf...@gmail.com:
>> I follow up your recommendation and for the moment I didn't used
>> "conflicted".
>>
>> So, I've made the nex R CMD check and I have the problem
>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck =
>> vI[[i]]) :
>>    there is no package called ‘dplyr’
>>
>> How I can  solve this issue?
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Le jeudi 4 avril 2019 à 08:22:26 UTC+2, Sebastian Meyer
>>  a écrit :
>>
>>
>> Note that output concerning masked objects are just messages which do
>> not cause your vignette to fail. So it is not stricly necessary to start
>> working on these conflicts now.
>>
>> However, looking closely at the win-builder check results
>> (https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Windows/00check.log),
>> I see the following output below these messages
>>
>>> Warning in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : NAs introduced by coercion
>>> Quitting from lines 529-573 (cartograflow.Rmd)
>>> Error: processing vignette 'cartograflow.Rmd' failed with diagnostics:
>>> argument is of length zero
>>
>> So the problem actually is in lines 529-573 of the cartograflow.Rmd
>> vignette (at least in the version submitted to win-builder a few weeks ago).
>>
>> Running tools::buildVignette("cartograflow.Rmd") locally, I see
>>
>>> Error in if (horiz) { : argument is of length zero
>>
>> and the subsequent traceback() shows that the error originates from
>>
>>> layoutLayer(title = "Professional mobility in Greater Paris",
>>>          coltitle = "black", author = "Cartograflow, 2019", sources =
>> "Sources : data : INSEE, RP, MOBPRO, 2017 ; basemap : IGN, APUR, UMS
>> 2414 RIATE, 2018.",
>>>          scale = 0.2, tabtitle = TRUE, frame = TRUE, north(pos =
>> "topright"),
>>>          col = "grey")
>>
>> So it seems to me that the unnamed argument 'north(pos = "topright")' is
>> wrongly matched to the "horiz" argument of layoutLayer().
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>      Sebastian
>>
>>
>> Am 04.04.19 um 07:20 schrieb cartograf...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Hi,I don't know if my explanations are clear.I tried several way to
>> solve this problem w/o success. Someone have an idea ?Thanks in advance
>>>
>>> On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>    Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I come back to you  because I have always the problem with
>> devtools::check of my package.
>>>>
>>>> I used the command to check my package with R-devel :
>>>> sylvain@sylvain <mailto:sylvain@sylvain>:~/svn$ bash R-devel.sh CMD
>> check --as-cran
>> /home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz
&g

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: Re :Re: Re :Re: package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

 Thanks!So, I've already check and I didn't see the descrption of the note in 
00check.log.The only thing I can say is that there's a problem with Author.
I tried to put Authors@R and it also generates notes.
Do you have any idea? 

You will find hereafter the copy of the file 00check.log.Thanks in advance 
* using log directory ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck’
* using R Under development (unstable) (2019-04-04 r76316)
* using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
* using session charset: UTF-8
* using option ‘--as-cran’
* checking for file ‘cartograflow/DESCRIPTION’ ... OK
* this is package ‘cartograflow’ version ‘1.0.0.0’
* package encoding: UTF-8
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ‘Sylvain Blondeau ’

New submission

Author field should be Authors@R.  Current value is:
  c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = "blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr", role = 
c("cre","aut")),
    person("other", "other", email = "other.ot...@gmail.com", role = 
c("aut")))
* checking package namespace information ... OK
* checking package dependencies ... OK
* checking if this is a source package ... OK
* checking if there is a namespace ... OK
* checking for executable files ... OK
* checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
* checking for portable file names ... OK
* checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK
* checking serialization versions ... OK
* checking whether package ‘cartograflow’ can be installed ... OK
* checking installed package size ... OK
* checking package directory ... OK
* checking for future file timestamps ... OK
* checking ‘build’ directory ... OK
* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
* checking top-level files ... OK
* checking for left-over files ... OK
* checking index information ... OK
* checking package subdirectories ... OK
* checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK
* checking R files for syntax errors ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking use of S3 registration ... OK
* checking dependencies in R code ... OK
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK
* checking replacement functions ... OK
* checking foreign function calls ... OK
* checking R code for possible problems ... OK
* checking Rd files ... OK
* checking Rd metadata ... OK
* checking Rd line widths ... OK
* checking Rd cross-references ... OK
* checking for missing documentation entries ... OK
* checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK
* checking Rd \usage sections ... OK
* checking Rd contents ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK
* checking installed files from ‘inst/doc’ ... OK
* checking files in ‘vignettes’ ... OK
* checking examples ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in ‘tests’ ... OK
* checking tests ... OK
  Running ‘testthat.R’
* checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK
* checking package vignettes in ‘inst/doc’ ... OK
* checking re-building of vignette outputs ... OK
* checking PDF version of manual ... OK
* DONE
Status: 1 NOTE


Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 à 18:22:32 UTC+2, Duncan Murdoch 
 a écrit :  
 
 On 07/04/2019 12:16 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,Thanks to your reply and your information. Right now it stays only one 
> note when I've made R-devel CMD CHECK --as-cran. So, I didn't identified this 
> note in repertory R.check. What's file I've to check?I'd like to know if I 
> can new submission in CRAN with one note. Sylvain

It will be in cartograflow.Rcheck/00check.log.

Duncan Murdoch

> 
> 
> 
> Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
>  
>    Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 à 17:09, Maëlle SALMON a 
>écrit :    I'd recommend reading 
>https://r-pkgs.org/description.html#dependencies (and the rest of the book is 
>very good as well), it'll help you understand why and how to declare 
>dependencies.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>      Den torsdag 4 april 2019 17:05:02 CEST, cartograf...@gmail.com 
> skrev:
>  
>  How I can declare the dependencies in DESCRIPTION file?
>   depends: library(dplyr,dependencies =TRUE)
> Thanks
> Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
>  
>    Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 à 14:42, Uwe Ligges 
>a écrit :   or forgot to declare a dependency on that package in the
> DESCRIPTION file...
> 
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
> 
> On 04.04.2019 13:34, Sebastian Meyer wrote:
>> There are probably no clairvoyants around here. So, again, without
>> access to the up-to-date source code of your package, nobody will be
>> abl

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: Re :Re: Re :Re: package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

 The file is Rdlatex;

Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 à 21:08:39 UTC+2, cartograf...@gmail.com 
 a écrit :  
 
  I've seen in file  the message below:
Package hyperref Warning: Option `pagebackref' has already been used,
(hyperref)    setting the option has no effect on input line 377.

Can this generate a note?

Sylvain

Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 à 21:01:59 UTC+2, cartograf...@gmail.com 
 a écrit :  
 
  Thanks!So, I've already check and I didn't see the descrption of the note in 
00check.log.The only thing I can say is that there's a problem with Author.
I tried to put Authors@R and it also generates notes.
Do you have any idea? 

You will find hereafter the copy of the file 00check.log.Thanks in advance 
* using log directory ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck’
* using R Under development (unstable) (2019-04-04 r76316)
* using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
* using session charset: UTF-8
* using option ‘--as-cran’
* checking for file ‘cartograflow/DESCRIPTION’ ... OK
* this is package ‘cartograflow’ version ‘1.0.0.0’
* package encoding: UTF-8
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ‘Sylvain Blondeau ’

New submission

Author field should be Authors@R.  Current value is:
  c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = "blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr", role = 
c("cre","aut")),
    person("other", "other", email = "other.ot...@gmail.com", role = 
c("aut")))
* checking package namespace information ... OK
* checking package dependencies ... OK
* checking if this is a source package ... OK
* checking if there is a namespace ... OK
* checking for executable files ... OK
* checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
* checking for portable file names ... OK
* checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK
* checking serialization versions ... OK
* checking whether package ‘cartograflow’ can be installed ... OK
* checking installed package size ... OK
* checking package directory ... OK
* checking for future file timestamps ... OK
* checking ‘build’ directory ... OK
* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
* checking top-level files ... OK
* checking for left-over files ... OK
* checking index information ... OK
* checking package subdirectories ... OK
* checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK
* checking R files for syntax errors ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking use of S3 registration ... OK
* checking dependencies in R code ... OK
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK
* checking replacement functions ... OK
* checking foreign function calls ... OK
* checking R code for possible problems ... OK
* checking Rd files ... OK
* checking Rd metadata ... OK
* checking Rd line widths ... OK
* checking Rd cross-references ... OK
* checking for missing documentation entries ... OK
* checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK
* checking Rd \usage sections ... OK
* checking Rd contents ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK
* checking installed files from ‘inst/doc’ ... OK
* checking files in ‘vignettes’ ... OK
* checking examples ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in ‘tests’ ... OK
* checking tests ... OK
  Running ‘testthat.R’
* checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK
* checking package vignettes in ‘inst/doc’ ... OK
* checking re-building of vignette outputs ... OK
* checking PDF version of manual ... OK
* DONE
Status: 1 NOTE


    Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 à 18:22:32 UTC+2, Duncan Murdoch 
 a écrit :  
 
 On 07/04/2019 12:16 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,Thanks to your reply and your information. Right now it stays only one 
> note when I've made R-devel CMD CHECK --as-cran. So, I didn't identified this 
> note in repertory R.check. What's file I've to check?I'd like to know if I 
> can new submission in CRAN with one note. Sylvain

It will be in cartograflow.Rcheck/00check.log.

Duncan Murdoch

> 
> 
> 
> Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
>  
>    Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 à 17:09, Maëlle SALMON a 
>écrit :    I'd recommend reading 
>https://r-pkgs.org/description.html#dependencies (and the rest of the book is 
>very good as well), it'll help you understand why and how to declare 
>dependencies.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>      Den torsdag 4 april 2019 17:05:02 CEST, cartograf...@gmail.com 
> skrev:
>  
>  How I can declare the dependencies in DESCRIPTION file?
>   depends: library(dplyr,dependencies =TRUE)
> Thanks
> Envoyé de

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: Re :Re: Re :Re: package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

 I've seen in file  the message below:
Package hyperref Warning: Option `pagebackref' has already been used,
(hyperref)    setting the option has no effect on input line 377.

Can this generate a note?

Sylvain

Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 à 21:01:59 UTC+2, cartograf...@gmail.com 
 a écrit :  
 
  Thanks!So, I've already check and I didn't see the descrption of the note in 
00check.log.The only thing I can say is that there's a problem with Author.
I tried to put Authors@R and it also generates notes.
Do you have any idea? 

You will find hereafter the copy of the file 00check.log.Thanks in advance 
* using log directory ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck’
* using R Under development (unstable) (2019-04-04 r76316)
* using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
* using session charset: UTF-8
* using option ‘--as-cran’
* checking for file ‘cartograflow/DESCRIPTION’ ... OK
* this is package ‘cartograflow’ version ‘1.0.0.0’
* package encoding: UTF-8
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ‘Sylvain Blondeau ’

New submission

Author field should be Authors@R.  Current value is:
  c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = "blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr", role = 
c("cre","aut")),
    person("other", "other", email = "other.ot...@gmail.com", role = 
c("aut")))
* checking package namespace information ... OK
* checking package dependencies ... OK
* checking if this is a source package ... OK
* checking if there is a namespace ... OK
* checking for executable files ... OK
* checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
* checking for portable file names ... OK
* checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK
* checking serialization versions ... OK
* checking whether package ‘cartograflow’ can be installed ... OK
* checking installed package size ... OK
* checking package directory ... OK
* checking for future file timestamps ... OK
* checking ‘build’ directory ... OK
* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
* checking top-level files ... OK
* checking for left-over files ... OK
* checking index information ... OK
* checking package subdirectories ... OK
* checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK
* checking R files for syntax errors ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking use of S3 registration ... OK
* checking dependencies in R code ... OK
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK
* checking replacement functions ... OK
* checking foreign function calls ... OK
* checking R code for possible problems ... OK
* checking Rd files ... OK
* checking Rd metadata ... OK
* checking Rd line widths ... OK
* checking Rd cross-references ... OK
* checking for missing documentation entries ... OK
* checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK
* checking Rd \usage sections ... OK
* checking Rd contents ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK
* checking installed files from ‘inst/doc’ ... OK
* checking files in ‘vignettes’ ... OK
* checking examples ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in ‘tests’ ... OK
* checking tests ... OK
  Running ‘testthat.R’
* checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK
* checking package vignettes in ‘inst/doc’ ... OK
* checking re-building of vignette outputs ... OK
* checking PDF version of manual ... OK
* DONE
Status: 1 NOTE


    Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 à 18:22:32 UTC+2, Duncan Murdoch 
 a écrit :  
 
 On 07/04/2019 12:16 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,Thanks to your reply and your information. Right now it stays only one 
> note when I've made R-devel CMD CHECK --as-cran. So, I didn't identified this 
> note in repertory R.check. What's file I've to check?I'd like to know if I 
> can new submission in CRAN with one note. Sylvain

It will be in cartograflow.Rcheck/00check.log.

Duncan Murdoch

> 
> 
> 
> Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
>  
>    Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 à 17:09, Maëlle SALMON a 
>écrit :    I'd recommend reading 
>https://r-pkgs.org/description.html#dependencies (and the rest of the book is 
>very good as well), it'll help you understand why and how to declare 
>dependencies.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>      Den torsdag 4 april 2019 17:05:02 CEST, cartograf...@gmail.com 
> skrev:
>  
>  How I can declare the dependencies in DESCRIPTION file?
>   depends: library(dplyr,dependencies =TRUE)
> Thanks
> Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
>  
>    Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 à 14:42, Uwe Ligges 
>a écrit :   or forgot 

[R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: Re :Re: Re :Re: Re :Re: package cartog

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

I put other.ot...@gmail.com because I don't show the name of the person. But 
when I've made the check I've put the good name. 

Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android 
 
  Le dim., avr. 7, 2019 à 21:10, Jeff Newmiller a 
écrit :   don't you think  is inappropriate?

On April 7, 2019 12:01:59 PM PDT, "cartograf...@gmail.com" 
 wrote:
>Thanks!So, I've already check and I didn't see the descrption of the
>note in 00check.log.The only thing I can say is that there's a problem
>with Author.
>I tried to put Authors@R and it also generates notes.
>Do you have any idea? 
>
>You will find hereafter the copy of the file 00check.log.Thanks in
>advance 
>* using log directory
>‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck’
>* using R Under development (unstable) (2019-04-04 r76316)
>* using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
>* using session charset: UTF-8
>* using option ‘--as-cran’
>* checking for file ‘cartograflow/DESCRIPTION’ ... OK
>* this is package ‘cartograflow’ version ‘1.0.0.0’
>* package encoding: UTF-8
>* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
>Maintainer: ‘Sylvain Blondeau ’
>
>New submission
>
>Author field should be Authors@R.  Current value is:
>  c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = "blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr",
>role = c("cre","aut")),
>    person("other", "other", email = "other.ot...@gmail.com",
>role = c("aut")))
>* checking package namespace information ... OK
>* checking package dependencies ... OK
>* checking if this is a source package ... OK
>* checking if there is a namespace ... OK
>* checking for executable files ... OK
>* checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
>* checking for portable file names ... OK
>* checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK
>* checking serialization versions ... OK
>* checking whether package ‘cartograflow’ can be installed ... OK
>* checking installed package size ... OK
>* checking package directory ... OK
>* checking for future file timestamps ... OK
>* checking ‘build’ directory ... OK
>* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
>* checking top-level files ... OK
>* checking for left-over files ... OK
>* checking index information ... OK
>* checking package subdirectories ... OK
>* checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK
>* checking R files for syntax errors ... OK
>* checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK
>* checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies
>... OK
>* checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
>* checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies
>... OK
>* checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
>* checking use of S3 registration ... OK
>* checking dependencies in R code ... OK
>* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK
>* checking replacement functions ... OK
>* checking foreign function calls ... OK
>* checking R code for possible problems ... OK
>* checking Rd files ... OK
>* checking Rd metadata ... OK
>* checking Rd line widths ... OK
>* checking Rd cross-references ... OK
>* checking for missing documentation entries ... OK
>* checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK
>* checking Rd \usage sections ... OK
>* checking Rd contents ... OK
>* checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK
>* checking installed files from ‘inst/doc’ ... OK
>* checking files in ‘vignettes’ ... OK
>* checking examples ... OK
>* checking for unstated dependencies in ‘tests’ ... OK
>* checking tests ... OK
>  Running ‘testthat.R’
>* checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK
>* checking package vignettes in ‘inst/doc’ ... OK
>* checking re-building of vignette outputs ... OK
>* checking PDF version of manual ... OK
>* DONE
>Status: 1 NOTE
>
>
>Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 à 18:22:32 UTC+2, Duncan Murdoch
> a écrit :  
> 
> On 07/04/2019 12:16 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hi,Thanks to your reply and your information. Right now it stays only
>one note when I've made R-devel CMD CHECK --as-cran. So, I didn't
>identified this note in repertory R.check. What's file I've to
>check?I'd like to know if I can new submission in CRAN with one
>note. Sylvain
>
>It will be in cartograflow.Rcheck/00check.log.
>
>Duncan Murdoch
>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
>>  
>>    Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 à 17:09, Maëlle
>SALMON a écrit :    I'd recommend reading
>https://r-pkgs.org/description.html#dependencies (and the rest of the
>book is very good as well), it'll help you u

[R-pkg-devel] package cartograflow_1.0.0.tar.gz

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

 Hi, 
After I submitted my package I received some remarks e.g add the exmple that 
I've taken into account. 
So, I used R-devel CMD check, I've always one 1 note about maintener which it's 
not a problem to submit and another note due to package size. 
...
* checking installed package size ... NOTE  installed size is  5.0Mb
  sub-directories of 1Mb or more:
    doc   4.4Mb...
I would like to know if I can submit in CRAN with this note if not, do you hnow 
how I can solve this issue? 
In vignette directories the html file size is of 4.3MB. I don't know how I can 
reduce the size. There are a lot of picture (cartography). 
Thanks in advance to your replySylvain

Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 à 21:32:07 UTC+2, Duncan Murdoch 
 a écrit :  
 
 On 07/04/2019 3:01 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks!
> So, I've already check and I didn't see the descrption of the note in 
> 00check.log.
> The only thing I can say is that there's a problem with Author.
> I tried to put Authors@R and it also generates notes.
> Do you have any idea?
> 
> You will find hereafter the copy of the file 00check.log.
> Thanks in advance
> 
> * using log directory ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck’
> * using R Under development (unstable) (2019-04-04 r76316)
> * using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
> * using session charset: UTF-8
> * using option ‘--as-cran’
> * checking for file ‘cartograflow/DESCRIPTION’ ... OK
> * this is package ‘cartograflow’ version ‘1.0.0.0’
> * package encoding: UTF-8
> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
> Maintainer: ‘Sylvain Blondeau ’
> 
> New submission
> 
> Author field should be Authors@R.  Current value is:
>    c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = "blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr", 
> role = c("cre","aut")),
>      person("other", "other", email = "other.ot...@gmail.com", 
> role = c("aut")))

That second author doesn't look right, but I don't think the note is 
complaining about that.  I think you probably have put something like 
this in your DESCRIPTION file:

Author:  c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = 
"blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
            person("other", "other", email = "other.ot...@gmail.com",
role = c("aut")))

and what it is saying is that you should instead use

Authors@R:  c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = 
"blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
            person("other", "other", email = "other.ot...@gmail.com",
role = c("aut")))

If my guess is right and you fix it, you may still get a NOTE.  To make 
it easier for the CRAN maintainers to know who to contact in case of an 
issue with the package, they display information about the package 
maintainer in a NOTE.  Since most NOTEs indicate likely problems, it 
would probably make sense for them to use some other formatting for the 
message, but that's how it is.

Duncan Murdoch



> * checking package namespace information ... OK
> * checking package dependencies ... OK
> * checking if this is a source package ... OK
> * checking if there is a namespace ... OK
> * checking for executable files ... OK
> * checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
> * checking for portable file names ... OK
> * checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK
> * checking serialization versions ... OK
> * checking whether package ‘cartograflow’ can be installed ... OK
> * checking installed package size ... OK
> * checking package directory ... OK
> * checking for future file timestamps ... OK
> * checking ‘build’ directory ... OK
> * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
> * checking top-level files ... OK
> * checking for left-over files ... OK
> * checking index information ... OK
> * checking package subdirectories ... OK
> * checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK
> * checking R files for syntax errors ... OK
> * checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK
> * checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
> * checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
> * checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies 
> ... OK
> * checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
> * checking use of S3 registration ... OK
> * checking dependencies in R code ... OK
> * checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK
> * checking replacement functions ... OK
> * checking foreign function calls ... OK
> * checking R code for possible problems ... OK
> * c

Re: [R-pkg-devel] package cartograflow_1.0.0.tar.gz

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

 Hi, 
I've made a new submission. 
There is no note about checking installed package size.Thanks. 
Sylvain

Le dimanche 5 mai 2019 à 14:44:24 UTC+2, cartograf...@gmail.com 
 a écrit :  
 
  Hi, 
After I submitted my package I received some remarks e.g add the exmple that 
I've taken into account. 
So, I used R-devel CMD check, I've always one 1 note about maintener which it's 
not a problem to submit and another note due to package size. 
...
* checking installed package size ... NOTE  installed size is  5.0Mb
  sub-directories of 1Mb or more:
    doc   4.4Mb...
I would like to know if I can submit in CRAN with this note if not, do you hnow 
how I can solve this issue? 
In vignette directories the html file size is of 4.3MB. I don't know how I can 
reduce the size. There are a lot of picture (cartography). 
Thanks in advance to your replySylvain

Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 à 21:32:07 UTC+2, Duncan Murdoch 
 a écrit :  
 
 On 07/04/2019 3:01 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks!
> So, I've already check and I didn't see the descrption of the note in 
> 00check.log.
> The only thing I can say is that there's a problem with Author.
> I tried to put Authors@R and it also generates notes.
> Do you have any idea?
> 
> You will find hereafter the copy of the file 00check.log.
> Thanks in advance
> 
> * using log directory ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck’
> * using R Under development (unstable) (2019-04-04 r76316)
> * using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
> * using session charset: UTF-8
> * using option ‘--as-cran’
> * checking for file ‘cartograflow/DESCRIPTION’ ... OK
> * this is package ‘cartograflow’ version ‘1.0.0.0’
> * package encoding: UTF-8
> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
> Maintainer: ‘Sylvain Blondeau ’
> 
> New submission
> 
> Author field should be Authors@R.  Current value is:
>    c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = "blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr", 
> role = c("cre","aut")),
>      person("other", "other", email = "other.ot...@gmail.com", 
> role = c("aut")))

That second author doesn't look right, but I don't think the note is 
complaining about that.  I think you probably have put something like 
this in your DESCRIPTION file:

Author:  c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = 
"blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
            person("other", "other", email = "other.ot...@gmail.com",
role = c("aut")))

and what it is saying is that you should instead use

Authors@R:  c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = 
"blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
            person("other", "other", email = "other.ot...@gmail.com",
role = c("aut")))

If my guess is right and you fix it, you may still get a NOTE.  To make 
it easier for the CRAN maintainers to know who to contact in case of an 
issue with the package, they display information about the package 
maintainer in a NOTE.  Since most NOTEs indicate likely problems, it 
would probably make sense for them to use some other formatting for the 
message, but that's how it is.

Duncan Murdoch



> * checking package namespace information ... OK
> * checking package dependencies ... OK
> * checking if this is a source package ... OK
> * checking if there is a namespace ... OK
> * checking for executable files ... OK
> * checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
> * checking for portable file names ... OK
> * checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK
> * checking serialization versions ... OK
> * checking whether package ‘cartograflow’ can be installed ... OK
> * checking installed package size ... OK
> * checking package directory ... OK
> * checking for future file timestamps ... OK
> * checking ‘build’ directory ... OK
> * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
> * checking top-level files ... OK
> * checking for left-over files ... OK
> * checking index information ... OK
> * checking package subdirectories ... OK
> * checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK
> * checking R files for syntax errors ... OK
> * checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK
> * checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
> * checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
> * checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies 
> ... OK
> * checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
> * checking use of S3 registration ... OK
> * checking dependencies in R code ... OK
&g

[R-pkg-devel] Re : Advice on setAs - issue of "in method for 'coe

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

Hi, I can give you an advise: try to use (ISO) official code for the geometries 
and put it as characters.
Sylvain 
Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android 
 
  Le sam., mai 25, 2019 à 0:41, Emmanuel Blondel 
(GMAIL) a écrit :   Dear all, I write here as i'm 
in process to submit a revision of 
/geometa/ package to CRAN in which i've enabled some coercing methods 
between main metadata object ISOMetadata from geometa, and foreign 
metadata objects (from emld / ncdf4 packages)

I've received a "pre-test archived" notification, because of the 
folllowing warnings dealing with the coercing:

  Warning: in method for 'coerce' with signature '"ISOMetadata","emld"': no 
definition for classes "ISOMetadata", "emld"
  Warning: in method for 'coerce' with signature '"emld","ISOMetadata"': no 
definition for classes "emld", "ISOMetadata"
  Warning: in method for 'coerce' with signature '"ncdf4","ISOMetadata"': no 
definition for classes "ncdf4", "ISOMetadata"

Detail at: 
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/geometa_0.5-0_20190524_153346/Windows/00check.log

I've found this thread that seems to discuss the same matter: 
https://github.com/r-spatial/sf/issues/129 . I'm facing the same 
situation where there is no good reason enough to add emld, ncdf4 as 
Imports, but rather to keep them as Suggests, as they are only used in 
these specific converters. In the doubt, i prefer asking here if there 
is some good practice to deal with these warnings, eventually to avoid 
it, or if this is considered by CRAN team as false positive.

Thanks a lot for your advice,

Best,
Emmanuel



    [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
  
Dear all, I write here as i'm in process to submit a revision of 
/geometa/ package to CRAN in which i've enabled some coercing methods 
between main metadata object ISOMetadata from geometa, and foreign 
metadata objects (from emld / ncdf4 packages)

I've received a "pre-test archived" notification, because of the 
folllowing warnings dealing with the coercing:

   Warning: in method for 'coerce' with signature '"ISOMetadata","emld"': no 
definition for classes "ISOMetadata", "emld"
   Warning: in method for 'coerce' with signature '"emld","ISOMetadata"': no 
definition for classes "emld", "ISOMetadata"
   Warning: in method for 'coerce' with signature '"ncdf4","ISOMetadata"': no 
definition for classes "ncdf4", "ISOMetadata"

Detail at: 
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/geometa_0.5-0_20190524_153346/Windows/00check.log

I've found this thread that seems to discuss the same matter: 
https://github.com/r-spatial/sf/issues/129 . I'm facing the same 
situation where there is no good reason enough to add emld, ncdf4 as 
Imports, but rather to keep them as Suggests, as they are only used in 
these specific converters. In the doubt, i prefer asking here if there 
is some good practice to deal with these warnings, eventually to avoid 
it, or if this is considered by CRAN team as false positive.

Thanks a lot for your advice,

Best,
Emmanuel



[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

[R-pkg-devel] Cartograflow package

[cartograf...@gmail.com]

HelloYesterday a new version of cartograflow v1.0.3 was updated on the crank.  
Everything seems to be OK.
However, when I write in help cartograflow I don't see the thumbnail with the 
different possibilities of visualization: pdf, HTML ...
Is this normal?
Thank you in advance for your answer
Sylvain
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel