[R-pkg-devel] Change package name

2023-06-20 Thread William Becker
Dear All,
 
I am the maintainer of a package which is unfortunately involved in a 
complicated dispute regarding its intellectual property (since the package was 
partly built under a contract with an organisation), but also the "branding" of 
the package, i.e. the name.
 
The story is long and complicated, but suffice to say that the name of the 
package is apparently creating a misleading connection with the organisation, 
and this is causing difficulties on both sides.
 
I am aware that changing the name of a package is very disruptive, and I am not 
considering it lightly. However just for information at this stage, I wonder if 
anyone could tell me whether packages have ever changed names on CRAN, what the 
rules are in these cases, and if there is any advice for minimising the 
disruption.
 
To reiterate, I am not (yet) planning to do this, but exploring options and 
looking for advice.
 
Thanks for any help,
William
 
William Becker PhD
willbecker.me https://www.willbecker.me/
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


Re: [R-pkg-devel] Change package name

2023-06-20 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel


Hi William,

On 20 June 2023 at 16:06, William Becker wrote:
| I am the maintainer of a package which is unfortunately involved in a 
complicated dispute regarding its intellectual property (since the package was 
partly built under a contract with an organisation), but also the "branding" of 
the package, i.e. the name.
|  
| The story is long and complicated, but suffice to say that the name of the 
package is apparently creating a misleading connection with the organisation, 
and this is causing difficulties on both sides.
|  
| I am aware that changing the name of a package is very disruptive, and I am 
not considering it lightly. However just for information at this stage, I 
wonder if anyone could tell me whether packages have ever changed names on 
CRAN, what the rules are in these cases, and if there is any advice for 
minimising the disruption.
|  
| To reiterate, I am not (yet) planning to do this, but exploring options and 
looking for advice.

You presented the reasoning convincingly and are aware of the general "we
would rather not do this" sentiment. Ultimately, this (as so often) is CRAN's
call so you have to do that (directly and not via this list).  My sense is
that you have a case but only CRAN can tell.

Good luck,  Dirk

-- 
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


Re: [R-pkg-devel] Change package name

2023-06-20 Thread Tim Salabim
I second Dirk's suggestion to address this issue directly to CRAN. I had
one of my packages changed once from "Reot" to "remote" (which enables
calculation of empirical orthogonal teleconnections as introduced by van
den Dool 2000) and had to present some convincing arguments to do so (in
quite a long email conversation). The point that finally convinced CRAN in
my case was that a reviewer of the complementing publication about the
package in jss requested that name change as Reot could easily be
misinterpreted as rotated eot, analogous to EOF and rotated EOF. And jss
apparently has the policy to only publish papers about packages available
from CRAN.

So, as Dirk said, it is possible to convince CRAN, but you need good
arguments.

Best
Tim

On Tue, Jun 20, 2023, 18:00 Dirk Eddelbuettel  wrote:

>
> Hi William,
>
> On 20 June 2023 at 16:06, William Becker wrote:
> | I am the maintainer of a package which is unfortunately involved in a
> complicated dispute regarding its intellectual property (since the package
> was partly built under a contract with an organisation), but also the
> "branding" of the package, i.e. the name.
> |
> | The story is long and complicated, but suffice to say that the name of
> the package is apparently creating a misleading connection with the
> organisation, and this is causing difficulties on both sides.
> |
> | I am aware that changing the name of a package is very disruptive, and I
> am not considering it lightly. However just for information at this stage,
> I wonder if anyone could tell me whether packages have ever changed names
> on CRAN, what the rules are in these cases, and if there is any advice for
> minimising the disruption.
> |
> | To reiterate, I am not (yet) planning to do this, but exploring options
> and looking for advice.
>
> You presented the reasoning convincingly and are aware of the general "we
> would rather not do this" sentiment. Ultimately, this (as so often) is
> CRAN's
> call so you have to do that (directly and not via this list).  My sense is
> that you have a case but only CRAN can tell.
>
> Good luck,  Dirk
>
> --
> dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
>
> __
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


Re: [R-pkg-devel] Change package name

2023-06-20 Thread Uwe Ligges




On 20.06.2023 18:00, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:


Hi William,

On 20 June 2023 at 16:06, William Becker wrote:
| I am the maintainer of a package which is unfortunately involved in a complicated 
dispute regarding its intellectual property (since the package was partly built under a 
contract with an organisation), but also the "branding" of the package, i.e. 
the name.
|
| The story is long and complicated, but suffice to say that the name of the 
package is apparently creating a misleading connection with the organisation, 
and this is causing difficulties on both sides.
|
| I am aware that changing the name of a package is very disruptive, and I am 
not considering it lightly. However just for information at this stage, I 
wonder if anyone could tell me whether packages have ever changed names on 
CRAN, what the rules are in these cases, and if there is any advice for 
minimising the disruption.
|
| To reiterate, I am not (yet) planning to do this, but exploring options and 
looking for advice.

You presented the reasoning convincingly and are aware of the general "we
would rather not do this" sentiment. Ultimately, this (as so often) is CRAN's
call so you have to do that (directly and not via this list).  My sense is
that you have a case but only CRAN can tell.


Yes, CRAN will accept this case.

Best,
Uwe Ligges






Good luck,  Dirk



__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


Re: [R-pkg-devel] Change package name

2023-06-20 Thread avi.e.gross
If you really need a new package name, is there an accepted way to update
the old name to at least provide a message for a while as to the new name to
use and perhaps have the load otherwise fail?


-Original Message-
From: R-package-devel  On Behalf Of
Dirk Eddelbuettel
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 12:00 PM
To: William Becker 
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Change package name


Hi William,

On 20 June 2023 at 16:06, William Becker wrote:
| I am the maintainer of a package which is unfortunately involved in a
complicated dispute regarding its intellectual property (since the package
was partly built under a contract with an organisation), but also the
"branding" of the package, i.e. the name.
|  
| The story is long and complicated, but suffice to say that the name of the
package is apparently creating a misleading connection with the
organisation, and this is causing difficulties on both sides.
|  
| I am aware that changing the name of a package is very disruptive, and I
am not considering it lightly. However just for information at this stage, I
wonder if anyone could tell me whether packages have ever changed names on
CRAN, what the rules are in these cases, and if there is any advice for
minimising the disruption.
|  
| To reiterate, I am not (yet) planning to do this, but exploring options
and looking for advice.

You presented the reasoning convincingly and are aware of the general "we
would rather not do this" sentiment. Ultimately, this (as so often) is
CRAN's
call so you have to do that (directly and not via this list).  My sense is
that you have a case but only CRAN can tell.

Good luck,  Dirk

-- 
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


Re: [R-pkg-devel] Change package name

2023-06-20 Thread William Becker
Dear All, 
Thanks very much for the positive and helpful replies here.
All the best,
William 

> On 20/06/2023 19:36 CEST Uwe Ligges  wrote:
> 
>  
> On 20.06.2023 18:00, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > 
> > Hi William,
> > 
> > On 20 June 2023 at 16:06, William Becker wrote:
> > | I am the maintainer of a package which is unfortunately involved in a 
> > complicated dispute regarding its intellectual property (since the package 
> > was partly built under a contract with an organisation), but also the 
> > "branding" of the package, i.e. the name.
> > |
> > | The story is long and complicated, but suffice to say that the name of 
> > the package is apparently creating a misleading connection with the 
> > organisation, and this is causing difficulties on both sides.
> > |
> > | I am aware that changing the name of a package is very disruptive, and I 
> > am not considering it lightly. However just for information at this stage, 
> > I wonder if anyone could tell me whether packages have ever changed names 
> > on CRAN, what the rules are in these cases, and if there is any advice for 
> > minimising the disruption.
> > |
> > | To reiterate, I am not (yet) planning to do this, but exploring options 
> > and looking for advice.
> > 
> > You presented the reasoning convincingly and are aware of the general "we
> > would rather not do this" sentiment. Ultimately, this (as so often) is 
> > CRAN's
> > call so you have to do that (directly and not via this list).  My sense is
> > that you have a case but only CRAN can tell.
> 
> Yes, CRAN will accept this case.
> 
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Good luck,  Dirk
> >

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel