[R-pkg-devel] What version does "CRAN check list" refer to ?
Hi, I am working on my first package and I released a new version (1.0.11). The CRAN checks link shows the last updated for today although the check details section refers to version 1.0.1. So, I’m confused about it. Are those check results from my old version or the current version just released? Package : https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/geneHummus/index.html CRAN checks : https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_geneHummus.html Best, Jose Jose V. Die, Ph.D. Departamento de Genética Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos Campus de Rabanales Universidad de Córdoba https://jdieramon.github.io __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
[R-pkg-devel] attempt to re-insert old removed package
Hi, I've been searching for some procedures to try an get an old package back into CRAN. It's package that has the re exclamation mark on cran github and is not available via install.packages() for modern version of R. However some small changes to the source were enough to get it installed via R CMD INSTALL, so I thought I might how difficult it would be to get it back into the CRAN repo, but I have been able to find procedures for that process. Any body who has managed this already? Helpful links appreciated, many thanks. [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] attempt to re-insert old removed package
For most packages[*], I assume that you can just take on the role as maintainer, bump the version number and resubmit. If you don't actually maintain it, then of course it might fall of CRAN again after a while. -pd [*] Actually, I expect that CRAN policy implies "all" here; I just can't be bothered to check... > On 5 Apr 2019, at 10:24 , Ramón Fallon wrote: > > Hi, > > I've been searching for some procedures to try an get an old package back > into CRAN. > > It's package that has the re exclamation mark on cran github and is not > available via install.packages() for modern version of R. > > However some small changes to the source were enough to get it installed > via R CMD INSTALL, so I thought I might how difficult it would be to get it > back into the CRAN repo, but I have been able to find procedures for that > process. > > Any body who has managed this already? Helpful links appreciated, many > thanks. > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > __ > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel -- Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Office: A 4.23 Email: pd@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] What version does "CRAN check list" refer to ?
On 5 April 2019 at 11:29, Jose V. Die wrote: | I am working on my first package and I released a new version (1.0.11). The CRAN checks link shows the last updated for today although the check details section refers to version 1.0.1. | | So, I’m confused about it. Are those check results from my old version or the current version just released? | | | Package : https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/geneHummus/index.html | CRAN checks : https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_geneHummus.html If you look at the package page you see that - your new version is the current one _in source form_ - the binary builds provided are currently _all behind at the previous version_ - the results page has a version column and is currently mixed It simply takes 24 to 48 hours for the builds jobs to catch up. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] attempt to re-insert old removed package
On 5 April 2019 at 13:30, peter dalgaard wrote: | For most packages[*], I assume that you can just take on the role as maintainer, bump the version number and resubmit. If you don't actually maintain it, then of course it might fall of CRAN again after a while. | | -pd | | [*] Actually, I expect that CRAN policy implies "all" here; I just can't be bothered to check... One important aspect, though, is that | > However some small changes to the source were enough to get it installed | > via R CMD INSTALL, so I thought I might how difficult it would be to get it may not be enough. Re-admitting a dead package is closer to admitting a new package so it is expected to be free and clear of WARNING, NOTE and ERROR too. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] attempt to re-insert old removed package
It depends on the specific case but attempting to check with the previous maintainer/author looks like a courteous first step before taking over. Georgi Boshnakov -Original Message- From: R-package-devel [mailto:r-package-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Dirk Eddelbuettel Sent: 05 April 2019 12:53 To: peter dalgaard Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] attempt to re-insert old removed package On 5 April 2019 at 13:30, peter dalgaard wrote: | For most packages[*], I assume that you can just take on the role as maintainer, bump the version number and resubmit. If you don't actually maintain it, then of course it might fall of CRAN again after a while. | | -pd | | [*] Actually, I expect that CRAN policy implies "all" here; I just can't be bothered to check... One important aspect, though, is that | > However some small changes to the source were enough to get it installed | > via R CMD INSTALL, so I thought I might how difficult it would be to get it may not be enough. Re-admitting a dead package is closer to admitting a new package so it is expected to be free and clear of WARNING, NOTE and ERROR too. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
